Titulo:
Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori
.
Sumario:
Lo que llamaré 'la objeción lógica irregular' es una línea de ataque en contra del principio común y convincente de que nuestra justificación de las verdades lógicas se fundamenta en la comprensión de sus conceptos constituyentes. Esta objeción busca socavar la posibilidad de cualquier conexión constitutiva profunda, en la epistemología de la lógica (y también más allá), entre la comprensión y la justificación. Mi tesis es que, si bien la objeción lógica irregular no llega a demostrar que este principio tradicional debe ser rechazado, no obstante, sirve para reforzar algunos refinamientos importantes.
Guardado en:
0124-6127
2462-9596
15
2014-01-01
67
85
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2014
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article_754 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori La irregularidad lógica y lo a priori constitutivo Lo que llamaré 'la objeción lógica irregular' es una línea de ataque en contra del principio común y convincente de que nuestra justificación de las verdades lógicas se fundamenta en la comprensión de sus conceptos constituyentes. Esta objeción busca socavar la posibilidad de cualquier conexión constitutiva profunda, en la epistemología de la lógica (y también más allá), entre la comprensión y la justificación. Mi tesis es que, si bien la objeción lógica irregular no llega a demostrar que este principio tradicional debe ser rechazado, no obstante, sirve para reforzar algunos refinamientos importantes. What I will call 'the deviant logician objection' is one line of attack against the common and compelling tenet that our justification for logical truths is grounded in our understanding of their constituent concepts. This objection seeks to undermine the possibility of any deep constitutive connection, in the epistemology of logic (and also beyond), between understanding and justification. My thesis is that while the deviant logician objection falls short of proving that this traditional tenet must be rejected, nonetheless it serves to bolster some important refinements. Sullivan, Arthur Conocimiento a priori epistemología de la lógica Timothy Williamson A priori knowledge epistemology of logic Timothy Williamson - 15 24 Núm. 24 , Año 2014 : Enero - Junio Artículo de revista Journal article 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z 2014-01-01 application/pdf Universidad de Caldas Discusiones Filosóficas 0124-6127 2462-9596 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/754 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/754 eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Discusiones Filosóficas - 2014 67 85 Beall, J.C. and Greg Restall. Logical Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print. Berger, Alan, ed. Kripke on the Incoherency of Adopting a Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Print. Boghossian, Paul. “Analyticity”. Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Eds. Hale, Bob and Crispin Wright. London: Blackwell Press, 1999. Print. ---. “Knowledge of Logic”. New Essays on the A Priori. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. “Williamson on the A Priori and the Analytic”. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 2010: 488-97. Print. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke, Eds. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. BonJour, Laurence. In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Print. Carnap, Rudolf. “Empiricism, Semantics, Ontology”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 1951: 20-40. Print. Devitt, Michael. “No Place for the a priori”. What Place for the A Priori? Eds. Schaffer, Michael and Michael Veber. Chicago: Open Court, 2011. Print. Flanagan, Brian. “Analyticity and the Deviant Logician”. Acta Analytica. 2013: 345-52. Print. Friedman, Michael. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998. Print. ---. “Transcendental Philosophy and A Priori Knowledge: A Neo-Kantian Perspective”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. “Einstein, Kant, and the A Priori”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements. Oct. 2008: 95-112. Print. Haack, Susan. Deviant Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974. Print. Horwich, Paul. “Stipulation, Meaning, and Apriority”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. Reflections on Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print. Pap, Arthur. The A Priori in Physical Theory. New York: King’s Crown Press, 1946. Print. Peacocke, Christopher. “The Programme of Moderate Rationalism”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. The Realm of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print. ---. “Understanding, Modality, Logical Operators”. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 2011: 472-80. Print. Quine, Willard van Orman. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. Philosophical Review. 1951: 20-43. Print. ---. Philosophy of Logic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970. Print. Railton, Peter. “Wittgenstein on the Normativity of Logic”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. Facts, Values, and Norms. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Print. Reichenbach, Hans. The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1965. Print. Russell, Gillian. “Metaphysical Analyticity and the Epistemology of Logic”. Philosophical Studies. Forthcoming. Schaffer, Michael and Michael Veber, Eds. What Place for the A Priori? Chicago: Open Court, 2011. Print. Stump. David. “Defending Conventions as Functionally A Priori Knowledge”. Philosophy of Science. Dec. 2003: 1149-60. Print. ---. “A Reconsideration of the Status of Newton’s Laws”. What Place for the A Priori? Eds. Schaffer, Michael and Michael Veber. Chicago: Open Court, 2011. Print. Williamson, Timothy. “Conceptual Truth”. The Aristotelian Society. 2006 (Sup.): 1-41. Print. ---. The Philosophy of Philosophy. London: Blackwell Press, 2008. Print. ---. “Reply to Kornblith”. Analysis. 2009: 123-6. Print. ---. “Reply to Boghossian”. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 2011: 498-506. Print. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge, 1921. Print. ---. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Oxford: Blackwell, 1953. Print. https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/754/677 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Discusiones Filosóficas |
| title |
Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori |
| spellingShingle |
Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori Sullivan, Arthur Conocimiento a priori epistemología de la lógica Timothy Williamson A priori knowledge epistemology of logic Timothy Williamson |
| title_short |
Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori |
| title_full |
Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori |
| title_fullStr |
Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori |
| title_sort |
logical deviance and the constitutive a priori |
| title_eng |
La irregularidad lógica y lo a priori constitutivo |
| description |
Lo que llamaré 'la objeción lógica irregular' es una línea de ataque en contra del principio común y convincente de que nuestra justificación de las verdades lógicas se fundamenta en la comprensión de sus conceptos constituyentes. Esta objeción busca socavar la posibilidad de cualquier conexión constitutiva profunda, en la epistemología de la lógica (y también más allá), entre la comprensión y la justificación. Mi tesis es que, si bien la objeción lógica irregular no llega a demostrar que este principio tradicional debe ser rechazado, no obstante, sirve para reforzar algunos refinamientos importantes.
|
| description_eng |
What I will call 'the deviant logician objection' is one line of attack against the common and compelling tenet that our justification for logical truths is grounded in our understanding of their constituent concepts. This objection seeks to undermine the possibility of any deep constitutive connection, in the epistemology of logic (and also beyond), between understanding and justification. My thesis is that while the deviant logician objection falls short of proving that this traditional tenet must be rejected, nonetheless it serves to bolster some important refinements.
|
| author |
Sullivan, Arthur |
| author_facet |
Sullivan, Arthur |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Conocimiento a priori epistemología de la lógica Timothy Williamson |
| topic |
Conocimiento a priori epistemología de la lógica Timothy Williamson A priori knowledge epistemology of logic Timothy Williamson |
| topic_facet |
Conocimiento a priori epistemología de la lógica Timothy Williamson A priori knowledge epistemology of logic Timothy Williamson |
| citationvolume |
15 |
| citationissue |
24 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 24 , Año 2014 : Enero - Junio |
| publisher |
Universidad de Caldas |
| ispartofjournal |
Discusiones Filosóficas |
| source |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/754 |
| language |
eng |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Discusiones Filosóficas - 2014 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references_eng |
Beall, J.C. and Greg Restall. Logical Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print. Berger, Alan, ed. Kripke on the Incoherency of Adopting a Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Print. Boghossian, Paul. “Analyticity”. Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Eds. Hale, Bob and Crispin Wright. London: Blackwell Press, 1999. Print. ---. “Knowledge of Logic”. New Essays on the A Priori. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. “Williamson on the A Priori and the Analytic”. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 2010: 488-97. Print. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke, Eds. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. BonJour, Laurence. In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Print. Carnap, Rudolf. “Empiricism, Semantics, Ontology”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 1951: 20-40. Print. Devitt, Michael. “No Place for the a priori”. What Place for the A Priori? Eds. Schaffer, Michael and Michael Veber. Chicago: Open Court, 2011. Print. Flanagan, Brian. “Analyticity and the Deviant Logician”. Acta Analytica. 2013: 345-52. Print. Friedman, Michael. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998. Print. ---. “Transcendental Philosophy and A Priori Knowledge: A Neo-Kantian Perspective”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. “Einstein, Kant, and the A Priori”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements. Oct. 2008: 95-112. Print. Haack, Susan. Deviant Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974. Print. Horwich, Paul. “Stipulation, Meaning, and Apriority”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. Reflections on Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print. Pap, Arthur. The A Priori in Physical Theory. New York: King’s Crown Press, 1946. Print. Peacocke, Christopher. “The Programme of Moderate Rationalism”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. The Realm of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print. ---. “Understanding, Modality, Logical Operators”. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 2011: 472-80. Print. Quine, Willard van Orman. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. Philosophical Review. 1951: 20-43. Print. ---. Philosophy of Logic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970. Print. Railton, Peter. “Wittgenstein on the Normativity of Logic”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. Facts, Values, and Norms. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Print. Reichenbach, Hans. The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1965. Print. Russell, Gillian. “Metaphysical Analyticity and the Epistemology of Logic”. Philosophical Studies. Forthcoming. Schaffer, Michael and Michael Veber, Eds. What Place for the A Priori? Chicago: Open Court, 2011. Print. Stump. David. “Defending Conventions as Functionally A Priori Knowledge”. Philosophy of Science. Dec. 2003: 1149-60. Print. ---. “A Reconsideration of the Status of Newton’s Laws”. What Place for the A Priori? Eds. Schaffer, Michael and Michael Veber. Chicago: Open Court, 2011. Print. Williamson, Timothy. “Conceptual Truth”. The Aristotelian Society. 2006 (Sup.): 1-41. Print. ---. The Philosophy of Philosophy. London: Blackwell Press, 2008. Print. ---. “Reply to Kornblith”. Analysis. 2009: 123-6. Print. ---. “Reply to Boghossian”. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 2011: 498-506. Print. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge, 1921. Print. ---. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Oxford: Blackwell, 1953. Print. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
| date_accessioned |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/754 |
| url_doi |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/754 |
| issn |
0124-6127 |
| eissn |
2462-9596 |
| citationstartpage |
67 |
| citationendpage |
85 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/754/677 |
| _version_ |
1811199602004590593 |