¿Influyen las características del comportamiento, el cuerpo y el hábitat en el rendimiento cognitivo de Sicalis flaveola?

Barreiro Padilla, Manuela; Torres, Wilmar Alexander; Montoya Lerma, James; Cruz Bernate, Lorena

doi:10.17151/bccm.2022.26.2.6

Titulo:

¿Influyen las características del comportamiento, el cuerpo y el hábitat en el rendimiento cognitivo de Sicalis flaveola?
.

Sumario:

En las últimas décadas se ha documentado la demostración de habilidades cognitivas en las aves y se han diseñado diversas pruebas para evaluar adecuadamente sus capacidades. Sin embargo, los resultados de estas pruebas también pueden verse influidos por aspectos distintos de la capacidadcognitiva, como las características de comportamiento, cuerpo y hábitat. Las especies que se enfrentan a cambios ambientales rápidos y nuevos deben expresar un rendimiento cognitivo que les permita superar los obstáculos mediante el aprendizaje y la actuación, a pesar del miedo a la novedad. Aunque Sicalis flaveola se desenvuelve con gran éxito en entornos perturbados, al igual que la mayoría de las especies tropicales, se desconoce en gran medida su flexibi... Ver más

Guardado en:

Revista:

Boletín Científico Centro de Museos Museo de Historia Natural

ISSN:

0123-3068

EISSN:

2462-8190

Autores:

Barreiro Padilla, Manuela

Torres, Wilmar Alexander

Montoya Lerma, James

Cruz Bernate, Lorena

Editor:

UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS

DOI:

10.17151/bccm.2022.26.2.6

Volumen:

Año de publicación:

2022-07-01

Pagina inicial:

123

Pagina final:

141

Pais:

Palabras claves:

Licencia:

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id	oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article_7520
record_format	ojs
spelling	¿Influyen las características del comportamiento, el cuerpo y el hábitat en el rendimiento cognitivo de Sicalis flaveola? ¿Do behavioral, body and habitat features influence the cognitive performance of Sicalis flaveola? En las últimas décadas se ha documentado la demostración de habilidades cognitivas en las aves y se han diseñado diversas pruebas para evaluar adecuadamente sus capacidades. Sin embargo, los resultados de estas pruebas también pueden verse influidos por aspectos distintos de la capacidadcognitiva, como las características de comportamiento, cuerpo y hábitat. Las especies que se enfrentan a cambios ambientales rápidos y nuevos deben expresar un rendimiento cognitivo que les permita superar los obstáculos mediante el aprendizaje y la actuación, a pesar del miedo a la novedad. Aunque Sicalis flaveola se desenvuelve con gran éxito en entornos perturbados, al igual que la mayoría de las especies tropicales, se desconoce en gran medida su flexibilidad conductual y su capacidad de aprendizaje. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la capacidad cognitiva de S. flaveola y determinar si la cognición se ve afectada por la timidez, la neofobia y la condición corporal en individuos de dos poblaciones con diferentes grados de urbanizaciónen Colombia. Se aplicaron pruebas de eliminación de obstáculos y de discriminación de colores a 28 individuos en cautiverio. La timidez y la neofobia no se vieron influenciadas por el lugar de origen, la condición corporal o el sexo. Para la prueba de eliminación de obstáculos, la timidez y la neofobia afectaron a la velocidad de aprendizaje, pero no a la discriminación. La capacidad de discriminación se vio afectada, a su vez, por la velocidad de aprendizaje de las aves en la eliminación de obstáculos, el nivel de dificultad y el número de intentos necesarios para resolver la prueba. Se confirma la capacidad de aprendizaje en esta especie.&nbsp; In recent decades, the demonstration of cognitive abilities in birds has been documented and various tests have been designed to adequately evaluate their capacities. However, the results of these tests can also be influenced by aspects other than cognitive ability, such as behavioral, body and habitat characteristics. Species facing rapid and new environmental changes must express a cognitive performance that allows them to overcome obstacles through learning and acting, despite the fear of novelty. Even though Sicalis flaveola is extremely successful in disturbed environments, as with most tropical species, its behavioral flexibility and learning capacity are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cognitive abilityof S. flaveola and to determine whether cognition is affected by shyness, neophobia and body condition in individuals from two populations with different degrees of urbanization in Colombia. Obstacle removal and color discrimination tests were applied to 28 individuals in captivity. Shyness and neophobia were not found to be influenced by the place of origin, body condition or sex. For obstacle removal test, shyness and neophobia affected S. flaveolalearning speed of learning, but not discrimination. The ability to discriminate was in turn affected by the speed at which the birds learned to remove obstacles, level of difficulty, and the number of attempts required to solve the test. Learning capacity in this species is confirmed.&nbsp; Barreiro Padilla, Manuela Torres, Wilmar Alexander Montoya Lerma, James Cruz Bernate, Lorena Cognición neofobia timidez urbanización aprendizaje Cognition neophobia shyness urbanization learning 26 2 Núm. 2 , Año 2022 : Julio - Diciembre Artículo de revista Journal article 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z 2022-07-01 application/pdf Boletín Científico Boletín Científico Centro de Museos Museo de Historia Natural 0123-3068 2462-8190 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/view/7520 10.17151/bccm.2022.26.2.6 https://doi.org/10.17151/bccm.2022.26.2.6 eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ 123 141 Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 Alcaldía de Jamundi. (2021). https://www.jamundi.gov.co/Paginas/default.aspx Alcaldía Santiago de Cali. (2018). Demografía de Santiago de Cali. https://www.cali.gov.co/planeacion/publicaciones/144497/demografia-de-santiago-de-cali/ Alvarado-Solano, D. P., & Ospina, J. T. O. (2015). Distribución espacial del Bosque Seco Tropical en el Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 20(3), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v20n3.46703 Ardila, R. (2011). Inteligencia, ¿qué sabemos y qué nos falta por investigar? Academia Colombiana de Ciencias, 35(134), 97–103. Bates, D., Maechler Martin, Bolker Ben, Walker Steven, & Christensen Rune. (2021). Package “lme4” Linear Mixed-Effects Models using “Eigen” and S4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Matrix Biondi, L. M., Fuentes, G. M., Córdoba, R. S., Bó, M. S., Cavalli, M., Paterlini, C. A., Castano, M. v, & García, G. O. (2020). Variation in boldness and novelty response between rural and urban predatory birds: The Chimango Caracara, Milvago chimango as study case. Behavioural Processes, 173, 104064. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104064 Biondi, L. M., Fuentes, G., & Susana, M. (2021). Behavioural factors underlying innovative problem-solving differences in an avian predator from two contrasting habitats. Animal Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01569-2 Bókony, V., Kulcsár, A., Tóth, Z., & Liker, A. (2012). Personality Traits and Behavioral Syndromes in Differently Urbanized Populations of House Sparrows (Passer domesticus). PLOS ONE, 7(5), e36639. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0036639 Boogert, N. J., Monceau, K., & Lefebvre, L. (2019). A field test of behavioral flexibility in Zenaida doves (Zenaida aurita). Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.020 Boogert, N. J., Reader, S. M., Hoppitt, W., & Laland, K. N. (2008). The origin and spread of innovations in starlings. Animal Behaviour, 75(4), 1509–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.033 Burkart, J. M., Schubiger, M. N., & van Schaik, C. P. (2017). The evolution of general intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000959 Cauchoix, M., Chow, P. K. Y., van Horik, J. O., Atance, C. M., Barbeau, E. J., Barragan-Jason, G., Bize, P., Boussard, A., Buechel, S. D., Cabirol, A., Cauchard, L., Claidière, N., Dalesman, S., Devaud, J. M., Didic, M., Doligez, B., Fagot, J., Fichtel, C., Henkevon der Malsburg, J., … Morand-Ferron, J. (2018). The repeatability of cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1756), 20170281. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0281 Chittka, L., Dyer, A. G., & Dornhaus, A. (2003). Bees trade-off foraging speed for accuracy. Nature, 424(388). Chittka, L., Skorupski, P., & Raine, N. E. (2009). Speed–accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(7), 400-407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.010 Dally, J. M., Emery, N. J., & Clayton, N. S. (2006). Food-caching western scrub-jays keep track of who was watching when. Science, 312(5780), 1662-1665. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1126539 DANE. (2020). Resultados y proyecciones censo DANE. (Consulted: 2021-11-18) http://www.dane.gov.co/files/censo2005/resultados_am_municipios.pdf Ducatez, S., Audet, J. N., & Lefebvre, L. (2015). Problem-solving and learning in Carib grackles: individuals show a consistent speed–accuracy trade-off. Animal Cognition, 18(2), 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0817-1 Ducatez, S., Audet, J. N., & Lefebvre, L. (2019). Speed–accuracy trade-off, detour reaching and response to PHA in Carib grackles. Animal Cognition, 22(5), 625–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01258-1 Dugatkin, L. A., & Alfieri, M. S. (2003). Boldness, behavioral inhibition and learning. Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 15(1), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2003.9522689 Dyer, A. G., & Chittka, L. (2004). Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) sacrifice foraging speed to solve difficult colour discrimination tasks. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 190(9), 759-763. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00359-004-0547-Y Espinal, L. S. (1967). Visión ecológica del departamento del Valle del Cauca. Universidad del Valle. Espinosa, C., Castro, I., & Cruz-Bernate, L. (2021). Cryptic sexual dimorphism in saffron finch (Sicalis flaveola, Aves: Thraupidae) in the tropic. Boletin Cientifico Del Centro de Museos, 25(1), 55-70. Federspiel, I. G., Garland, A., Guez, D., Bugnyar, T., Healy, S. D., Güntürkün, O., & Griffin, A. S. (2017). Adjusting foraging strategies: a comparison of rural and urban common mynas (Acridotheres tristis). Animal Cognition, 20(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1045-7 Goumas, M., Lee, V. E., Boogert, N. J., Kelley, L. A., & Thornton, A. (2020). The Role of Animal Cognition in Human-Wildlife Interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3019. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589978 Greenberg, R. (1990). Feeding neophobia and ecological plasticity: a test of the hypothesis with captive sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 39(2), 375-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80884-X Griffin, A. S., & Boyce, H. M. (2009). Indian mynahs, Acridotheres tristis, learn about dangerous places by observing the fate of others. Animal Behaviour, 78(1), 79-84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.03.012 Griffin, A. S., Tebbich, S., & Bugnyar, T. (2017). Animal cognition in a human-dominated world. Animal Cognition, 20(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1051-9 Gross J. & Ligges, U. (2015). Nortest Tests for Normality. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nortest/nortest.pdf Guillette, L. M., Reddon, A. R., Hoeschele, M., & Sturdy, C. B. (2011). Sometimes slower is better: Slow-exploring birds are more sensitive to changes in a vocal discrimination task. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1706), 767-773. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1669 Hackett, P. M. W. (2020). The Complexity of Bird Behaviour. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12192-1 Hilty, S. L., Brown, W. H., Álvarez López, H. & Tudor, G. (2001). Guia de las aves de Colombia. Universidad del Valle. IDEAM. (2015). Instituto de Hidrología, Metereología y Estudios Ambientales-IDEAM, Estación 26055140 Jamundi y 26055120-Univ. del Valle (Consulted: 2021-11-18) http://www.ideam.gov.co/solicitud-de-informacion Jakob, E. M., Marshall, S. D., & Uetz, G. W. (1996). Estimating Fitness: A Comparison of Body Condition Indices. Oikos,77(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545585 Kamil, A. (1988). A Synthetic Approach to the Study of Animal Intelligence. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1013&context=bioscibehavior Lambert, C. T., Balasubramanian, G., Camacho-Alpízar, A., & Guillette, L. M. (2021). Do sex differences in construction behavior relate to differences in physical cognitive abilities? Animal Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01577-2 Lee, V. E., & Thornton, A. (2021). Animal Cognition in an Urbanised World. In Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (Vol. 9). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.633947 Lefebvre, L., Ducatez, S., & Audet, J. N. (2016). Feeding innovations in a nested phylogeny of Neotropical passerines. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1690). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0188 Liebl, A. L., & Martin, L. B. (2014). Living on the edge: Range edge birds consume novel foods sooner than established ones. Behavioral Ecology, 25(5), 1089-1096. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru089 Madden, J. R., Langley, E. J. G., Whiteside, M. A., Beardsworth, C. E., & van Horik, J. O. (2018). The quick are the dead: pheasants that are slow to reverse a learned association survive for longer in the wild. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1756), 20170297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0297 Magory Cohen, T., Kumar, R. S., Nair, M., Hauber, M. E., & Dor, R. (2020). Innovation and decreased neophobia drive invasion success in a widespread avian invader. Animal Behaviour, 163, 61-72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.02.012 Medina-García, A., Jawor, J. M., & Wright, T. F. (2017). Cognition, personality, and stress in budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulatus. Behavioral Ecology, 28(6), 1504-1516. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx116 Møller, A. P., Diaz, M., Flensted-Jensen, E., Grim, T., Ibáñez-Álamo, J. D., Jokimäki, J., Mänd, R., Markó, G., & Tryjanowski, P. (2012). High urban population density of birds reflects their timing of urbanization. Oecologia, 170(3), 867-875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2355-3 Oswald, I. (1964). Learning and Instinct in Animals. By W. H. Thorpe. British Journal of Psychiatry, 110(464), 141-142. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.110.464.141 Overington, S. E., Cauchard, L., Côté, K. A., & Lefebvre, L. (2011). Innovative foraging behaviour in birds: What characterizes an innovator? Behavioural Processes, 87(3), 274-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2011.06.002 Patten, M. A., & Kelly, J. F. (2010). Habitat selection and the perceptual trap. Ecological Applications, 20(8), 2148-2156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1890/09-2370.1 Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., & Sarkar D. (2021). Package “NLME” Title Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. https://svn.r-project.org/R-packages/trunk/nlme/ Preiszner, B., Papp, S., Pipoly, I., Seress, G., Vincze, E., Liker, A., & Bókony, V. (2017). Problem-solving performance and reproductive success of great tits in urban and forest habitats. Animal Cognition, 20(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1008-z Pritchard, D. J., Hurly, T. A., Tello-Ramos, M. C., & Healy, S. D. (2016). Why study cognition in the wild (and how to test it)? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 105(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.195 Remsen, J. V. Jr., Areta, J. I., Bonaccorso, E., Claramunt, S., Jaramillo, A., Lane, D.F., Pacheco, J.F., Robbins, M.B., Stiles, F.G. & Zimmer, K.J. (2021). A Classification of the Bird Species of South America. https://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm Ruiz-Gomez, M. de L., Huntingford, F. A., Øverli, Ø., Thörnqvist, P.-O., & Höglund, E. (2011). Response to environmental change in rainbow trout selected for divergent stress coping styles. Physiology & Behavior, 102(3), 317–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.11.023 Salkind, N. (2012). Encyclopedia of Research Design. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288 Schönpflug, W. (2001). Experimental Laboratories: Biobehavioral. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 5109-5113). Pergamon. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00016-4 Schubiger, M. N., Fichtel, C., & Burkart, J. M. (2020). Validity of Cognitive Tests for Non-human Animals: Pitfalls and Prospects. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01835 Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the Dimension of a Model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461-464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136 Seaman, S. C., Waran, N. K., Mason, G., & D’Eath, R. B. (2008). Animal economics: assessing the motivation of female laboratory rabbits to reach a platform, social contact and food. Animal Behaviour, 75(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.031 Seymour, C. L., Simmons, R. E., Morling, F., George, S. T., Peters, K., & O’Riain, M. J. (2020). Caught on camera: The impacts of urban domestic cats on wild prey in an African city and neighbouring protected areas. Global Ecology and Conservation, 23, e01198. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GECCO.2020.E01198 Shapiro, S. S. (1990). How to test normality and other distributional assumptions. ASQC. Shaw, R. C. (2017). Testing cognition in the wild: factors affecting performance and individual consistency in two measures of avian cognition. Behavioural Processes, 134, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.004 Shochat, E., Lerman, S. B., Anderies, J. M., Warren, P. S., Faeth, S. H., & Nilon, C. H. (2010). Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems. BioScience, 60(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6 Sih, A., & Giudice, M. del. (2012a). Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: A behavioural ecology perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1603), 2762-2772. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0216 Sih, A., & Giudice, M. del. (2012b). Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367(1603), 2762–2772. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0216 Sol, D., Griffin, A. S., Bartomeus, I., & Boyce, H. (2011). Exploring or Avoiding Novel Food Resources? The Novelty Conflict in an Invasive Bird. PLOS ONE, 6(5), e19535-. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019535 Sol, D., Timmermans, S., & Lefebvre, L. (2002). Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Animal Behaviour, 63(3), 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1006/ANBE.2001.1953 Solaro, C., & Sarasola, J. H. (2019). Urban living predicts behavioural response in a neotropical raptor. Behavioural Processes, 169, 103995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103995 Szabo, B., Damas-Moreira, I., & Whiting, M. J. (2020). Can Cognitive Ability Give Invasive Species the Means to Succeed? A Review of the Evidence. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 187. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2020.00187 Team Core R. (2021). R: a language and environment for statistical computing (4.1.1). Thorpe, W. (1956). Learning and instinct in animals. Harvard University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1957-02494-000 Tryjanowski, P., Møller, A. P., Morelli, F., Biaduń, W., Brauze, T., Ciach, M., Czechowski, P., Czyz, S., Dulisz, B., Golawski, A., Hetmański, T., Indykiewicz, P., Mitrus, C., Myczko, L., Nowakowski, J. J., Polakowski, M., Takacs, V., Wysocki, D., & Zduniak, P. (2016). Urbanization affects neophilia and risk-taking at bird-feeders. Scientific Reports, 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28575 Uttara, S., Bhuvandas, Nishi., & Aggarwal, Vanita. (2012). Impacts of urbanization on environment. International Journal of Research in Engineering & Applied Sciences, 2(2),1637-1645. Valcarcel, A., & Fernández-Juricic, E. (2009). Antipredator strategies of house finches: are urban habitats safe spots from predators even when humans are around? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63(5), 673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0701-6 Van Horik, J. O., Langley, E. J. G., Whiteside, M. A., & Madden, J. R. (2017). Differential participation in cognitive tests is driven by personality, sex, body condition and experience. Behavioural Processes, 134, 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.07.001 Van Horik, J. O., Langley, E. J. G., Whiteside, M. A., & Madden, J. R. (2019). A single factor explanation for associative learning performance on colour discrimination problems in common pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Intelligence, 74, 53-61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.07.001 Van Horik, J. O., & Madden, J. R. (2016). A problem with problem solving: Motivational traits, but not cognition, predict success on novel operant foraging tasks. Animal Behaviour, 114, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.02.006 Weaver, K. F., Morales, V., Dunn, S. L., Godde, K., & Weaver, P. F. (2017). Pearson’s and Spearman’s Correlation. An Introduction to Statistical Analysis in Research, 435-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119454205.CH10 Webster, S. J., & Lefebvre, L. (2001). Problem solving and neophobia in a columbiform–passeriform assemblage in Barbados. Animal Behaviour, 62(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.172. https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/download/7520/6604 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication
institution	UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS
thumbnail	https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png
country_str	Colombia
collection	Boletín Científico Centro de Museos Museo de Historia Natural
title	¿Influyen las características del comportamiento, el cuerpo y el hábitat en el rendimiento cognitivo de Sicalis flaveola?
spellingShingle	¿Influyen las características del comportamiento, el cuerpo y el hábitat en el rendimiento cognitivo de Sicalis flaveola? Barreiro Padilla, Manuela Torres, Wilmar Alexander Montoya Lerma, James Cruz Bernate, Lorena Cognición neofobia timidez urbanización aprendizaje Cognition neophobia shyness urbanization learning
title_short	¿Influyen las características del comportamiento, el cuerpo y el hábitat en el rendimiento cognitivo de Sicalis flaveola?
title_full	¿Influyen las características del comportamiento, el cuerpo y el hábitat en el rendimiento cognitivo de Sicalis flaveola?
title_fullStr	¿Influyen las características del comportamiento, el cuerpo y el hábitat en el rendimiento cognitivo de Sicalis flaveola?
title_full_unstemmed	¿Influyen las características del comportamiento, el cuerpo y el hábitat en el rendimiento cognitivo de Sicalis flaveola?
title_sort	¿influyen las características del comportamiento, el cuerpo y el hábitat en el rendimiento cognitivo de sicalis flaveola?
title_eng	¿Do behavioral, body and habitat features influence the cognitive performance of Sicalis flaveola?
description	En las últimas décadas se ha documentado la demostración de habilidades cognitivas en las aves y se han diseñado diversas pruebas para evaluar adecuadamente sus capacidades. Sin embargo, los resultados de estas pruebas también pueden verse influidos por aspectos distintos de la capacidadcognitiva, como las características de comportamiento, cuerpo y hábitat. Las especies que se enfrentan a cambios ambientales rápidos y nuevos deben expresar un rendimiento cognitivo que les permita superar los obstáculos mediante el aprendizaje y la actuación, a pesar del miedo a la novedad. Aunque Sicalis flaveola se desenvuelve con gran éxito en entornos perturbados, al igual que la mayoría de las especies tropicales, se desconoce en gran medida su flexibilidad conductual y su capacidad de aprendizaje. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la capacidad cognitiva de S. flaveola y determinar si la cognición se ve afectada por la timidez, la neofobia y la condición corporal en individuos de dos poblaciones con diferentes grados de urbanizaciónen Colombia. Se aplicaron pruebas de eliminación de obstáculos y de discriminación de colores a 28 individuos en cautiverio. La timidez y la neofobia no se vieron influenciadas por el lugar de origen, la condición corporal o el sexo. Para la prueba de eliminación de obstáculos, la timidez y la neofobia afectaron a la velocidad de aprendizaje, pero no a la discriminación. La capacidad de discriminación se vio afectada, a su vez, por la velocidad de aprendizaje de las aves en la eliminación de obstáculos, el nivel de dificultad y el número de intentos necesarios para resolver la prueba. Se confirma la capacidad de aprendizaje en esta especie.&nbsp;
description_eng	In recent decades, the demonstration of cognitive abilities in birds has been documented and various tests have been designed to adequately evaluate their capacities. However, the results of these tests can also be influenced by aspects other than cognitive ability, such as behavioral, body and habitat characteristics. Species facing rapid and new environmental changes must express a cognitive performance that allows them to overcome obstacles through learning and acting, despite the fear of novelty. Even though Sicalis flaveola is extremely successful in disturbed environments, as with most tropical species, its behavioral flexibility and learning capacity are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cognitive abilityof S. flaveola and to determine whether cognition is affected by shyness, neophobia and body condition in individuals from two populations with different degrees of urbanization in Colombia. Obstacle removal and color discrimination tests were applied to 28 individuals in captivity. Shyness and neophobia were not found to be influenced by the place of origin, body condition or sex. For obstacle removal test, shyness and neophobia affected S. flaveolalearning speed of learning, but not discrimination. The ability to discriminate was in turn affected by the speed at which the birds learned to remove obstacles, level of difficulty, and the number of attempts required to solve the test. Learning capacity in this species is confirmed.&nbsp;
author	Barreiro Padilla, Manuela Torres, Wilmar Alexander Montoya Lerma, James Cruz Bernate, Lorena
author_facet	Barreiro Padilla, Manuela Torres, Wilmar Alexander Montoya Lerma, James Cruz Bernate, Lorena
topicspa_str_mv	Cognición neofobia timidez urbanización aprendizaje
topic	Cognición neofobia timidez urbanización aprendizaje Cognition neophobia shyness urbanization learning
topic_facet	Cognición neofobia timidez urbanización aprendizaje Cognition neophobia shyness urbanization learning
citationvolume	26
citationissue	2
citationedition	Núm. 2 , Año 2022 : Julio - Diciembre
publisher	Boletín Científico
ispartofjournal	Boletín Científico Centro de Museos Museo de Historia Natural
source	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/view/7520
language	eng
format	Article
rights	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references_eng	Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 Alcaldía de Jamundi. (2021). https://www.jamundi.gov.co/Paginas/default.aspx Alcaldía Santiago de Cali. (2018). Demografía de Santiago de Cali. https://www.cali.gov.co/planeacion/publicaciones/144497/demografia-de-santiago-de-cali/ Alvarado-Solano, D. P., & Ospina, J. T. O. (2015). Distribución espacial del Bosque Seco Tropical en el Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 20(3), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v20n3.46703 Ardila, R. (2011). Inteligencia, ¿qué sabemos y qué nos falta por investigar? Academia Colombiana de Ciencias, 35(134), 97–103. Bates, D., Maechler Martin, Bolker Ben, Walker Steven, & Christensen Rune. (2021). Package “lme4” Linear Mixed-Effects Models using “Eigen” and S4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Matrix Biondi, L. M., Fuentes, G. M., Córdoba, R. S., Bó, M. S., Cavalli, M., Paterlini, C. A., Castano, M. v, & García, G. O. (2020). Variation in boldness and novelty response between rural and urban predatory birds: The Chimango Caracara, Milvago chimango as study case. Behavioural Processes, 173, 104064. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104064 Biondi, L. M., Fuentes, G., & Susana, M. (2021). Behavioural factors underlying innovative problem-solving differences in an avian predator from two contrasting habitats. Animal Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01569-2 Bókony, V., Kulcsár, A., Tóth, Z., & Liker, A. (2012). Personality Traits and Behavioral Syndromes in Differently Urbanized Populations of House Sparrows (Passer domesticus). PLOS ONE, 7(5), e36639. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0036639 Boogert, N. J., Monceau, K., & Lefebvre, L. (2019). A field test of behavioral flexibility in Zenaida doves (Zenaida aurita). Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.020 Boogert, N. J., Reader, S. M., Hoppitt, W., & Laland, K. N. (2008). The origin and spread of innovations in starlings. Animal Behaviour, 75(4), 1509–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.033 Burkart, J. M., Schubiger, M. N., & van Schaik, C. P. (2017). The evolution of general intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000959 Cauchoix, M., Chow, P. K. Y., van Horik, J. O., Atance, C. M., Barbeau, E. J., Barragan-Jason, G., Bize, P., Boussard, A., Buechel, S. D., Cabirol, A., Cauchard, L., Claidière, N., Dalesman, S., Devaud, J. M., Didic, M., Doligez, B., Fagot, J., Fichtel, C., Henkevon der Malsburg, J., … Morand-Ferron, J. (2018). The repeatability of cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1756), 20170281. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0281 Chittka, L., Dyer, A. G., & Dornhaus, A. (2003). Bees trade-off foraging speed for accuracy. Nature, 424(388). Chittka, L., Skorupski, P., & Raine, N. E. (2009). Speed–accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(7), 400-407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.010 Dally, J. M., Emery, N. J., & Clayton, N. S. (2006). Food-caching western scrub-jays keep track of who was watching when. Science, 312(5780), 1662-1665. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1126539 DANE. (2020). Resultados y proyecciones censo DANE. (Consulted: 2021-11-18) http://www.dane.gov.co/files/censo2005/resultados_am_municipios.pdf Ducatez, S., Audet, J. N., & Lefebvre, L. (2015). Problem-solving and learning in Carib grackles: individuals show a consistent speed–accuracy trade-off. Animal Cognition, 18(2), 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0817-1 Ducatez, S., Audet, J. N., & Lefebvre, L. (2019). Speed–accuracy trade-off, detour reaching and response to PHA in Carib grackles. Animal Cognition, 22(5), 625–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01258-1 Dugatkin, L. A., & Alfieri, M. S. (2003). Boldness, behavioral inhibition and learning. Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 15(1), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2003.9522689 Dyer, A. G., & Chittka, L. (2004). Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) sacrifice foraging speed to solve difficult colour discrimination tasks. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 190(9), 759-763. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00359-004-0547-Y Espinal, L. S. (1967). Visión ecológica del departamento del Valle del Cauca. Universidad del Valle. Espinosa, C., Castro, I., & Cruz-Bernate, L. (2021). Cryptic sexual dimorphism in saffron finch (Sicalis flaveola, Aves: Thraupidae) in the tropic. Boletin Cientifico Del Centro de Museos, 25(1), 55-70. Federspiel, I. G., Garland, A., Guez, D., Bugnyar, T., Healy, S. D., Güntürkün, O., & Griffin, A. S. (2017). Adjusting foraging strategies: a comparison of rural and urban common mynas (Acridotheres tristis). Animal Cognition, 20(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1045-7 Goumas, M., Lee, V. E., Boogert, N. J., Kelley, L. A., & Thornton, A. (2020). The Role of Animal Cognition in Human-Wildlife Interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3019. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589978 Greenberg, R. (1990). Feeding neophobia and ecological plasticity: a test of the hypothesis with captive sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 39(2), 375-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80884-X Griffin, A. S., & Boyce, H. M. (2009). Indian mynahs, Acridotheres tristis, learn about dangerous places by observing the fate of others. Animal Behaviour, 78(1), 79-84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.03.012 Griffin, A. S., Tebbich, S., & Bugnyar, T. (2017). Animal cognition in a human-dominated world. Animal Cognition, 20(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1051-9 Gross J. & Ligges, U. (2015). Nortest Tests for Normality. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nortest/nortest.pdf Guillette, L. M., Reddon, A. R., Hoeschele, M., & Sturdy, C. B. (2011). Sometimes slower is better: Slow-exploring birds are more sensitive to changes in a vocal discrimination task. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1706), 767-773. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1669 Hackett, P. M. W. (2020). The Complexity of Bird Behaviour. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12192-1 Hilty, S. L., Brown, W. H., Álvarez López, H. & Tudor, G. (2001). Guia de las aves de Colombia. Universidad del Valle. IDEAM. (2015). Instituto de Hidrología, Metereología y Estudios Ambientales-IDEAM, Estación 26055140 Jamundi y 26055120-Univ. del Valle (Consulted: 2021-11-18) http://www.ideam.gov.co/solicitud-de-informacion Jakob, E. M., Marshall, S. D., & Uetz, G. W. (1996). Estimating Fitness: A Comparison of Body Condition Indices. Oikos,77(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545585 Kamil, A. (1988). A Synthetic Approach to the Study of Animal Intelligence. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1013&context=bioscibehavior Lambert, C. T., Balasubramanian, G., Camacho-Alpízar, A., & Guillette, L. M. (2021). Do sex differences in construction behavior relate to differences in physical cognitive abilities? Animal Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01577-2 Lee, V. E., & Thornton, A. (2021). Animal Cognition in an Urbanised World. In Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (Vol. 9). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.633947 Lefebvre, L., Ducatez, S., & Audet, J. N. (2016). Feeding innovations in a nested phylogeny of Neotropical passerines. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1690). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0188 Liebl, A. L., & Martin, L. B. (2014). Living on the edge: Range edge birds consume novel foods sooner than established ones. Behavioral Ecology, 25(5), 1089-1096. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru089 Madden, J. R., Langley, E. J. G., Whiteside, M. A., Beardsworth, C. E., & van Horik, J. O. (2018). The quick are the dead: pheasants that are slow to reverse a learned association survive for longer in the wild. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1756), 20170297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0297 Magory Cohen, T., Kumar, R. S., Nair, M., Hauber, M. E., & Dor, R. (2020). Innovation and decreased neophobia drive invasion success in a widespread avian invader. Animal Behaviour, 163, 61-72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.02.012 Medina-García, A., Jawor, J. M., & Wright, T. F. (2017). Cognition, personality, and stress in budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulatus. Behavioral Ecology, 28(6), 1504-1516. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx116 Møller, A. P., Diaz, M., Flensted-Jensen, E., Grim, T., Ibáñez-Álamo, J. D., Jokimäki, J., Mänd, R., Markó, G., & Tryjanowski, P. (2012). High urban population density of birds reflects their timing of urbanization. Oecologia, 170(3), 867-875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2355-3 Oswald, I. (1964). Learning and Instinct in Animals. By W. H. Thorpe. British Journal of Psychiatry, 110(464), 141-142. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.110.464.141 Overington, S. E., Cauchard, L., Côté, K. A., & Lefebvre, L. (2011). Innovative foraging behaviour in birds: What characterizes an innovator? Behavioural Processes, 87(3), 274-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2011.06.002 Patten, M. A., & Kelly, J. F. (2010). Habitat selection and the perceptual trap. Ecological Applications, 20(8), 2148-2156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1890/09-2370.1 Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., & Sarkar D. (2021). Package “NLME” Title Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. https://svn.r-project.org/R-packages/trunk/nlme/ Preiszner, B., Papp, S., Pipoly, I., Seress, G., Vincze, E., Liker, A., & Bókony, V. (2017). Problem-solving performance and reproductive success of great tits in urban and forest habitats. Animal Cognition, 20(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1008-z Pritchard, D. J., Hurly, T. A., Tello-Ramos, M. C., & Healy, S. D. (2016). Why study cognition in the wild (and how to test it)? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 105(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.195 Remsen, J. V. Jr., Areta, J. I., Bonaccorso, E., Claramunt, S., Jaramillo, A., Lane, D.F., Pacheco, J.F., Robbins, M.B., Stiles, F.G. & Zimmer, K.J. (2021). A Classification of the Bird Species of South America. https://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm Ruiz-Gomez, M. de L., Huntingford, F. A., Øverli, Ø., Thörnqvist, P.-O., & Höglund, E. (2011). Response to environmental change in rainbow trout selected for divergent stress coping styles. Physiology & Behavior, 102(3), 317–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.11.023 Salkind, N. (2012). Encyclopedia of Research Design. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288 Schönpflug, W. (2001). Experimental Laboratories: Biobehavioral. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 5109-5113). Pergamon. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00016-4 Schubiger, M. N., Fichtel, C., & Burkart, J. M. (2020). Validity of Cognitive Tests for Non-human Animals: Pitfalls and Prospects. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01835 Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the Dimension of a Model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461-464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136 Seaman, S. C., Waran, N. K., Mason, G., & D’Eath, R. B. (2008). Animal economics: assessing the motivation of female laboratory rabbits to reach a platform, social contact and food. Animal Behaviour, 75(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.031 Seymour, C. L., Simmons, R. E., Morling, F., George, S. T., Peters, K., & O’Riain, M. J. (2020). Caught on camera: The impacts of urban domestic cats on wild prey in an African city and neighbouring protected areas. Global Ecology and Conservation, 23, e01198. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GECCO.2020.E01198 Shapiro, S. S. (1990). How to test normality and other distributional assumptions. ASQC. Shaw, R. C. (2017). Testing cognition in the wild: factors affecting performance and individual consistency in two measures of avian cognition. Behavioural Processes, 134, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.004 Shochat, E., Lerman, S. B., Anderies, J. M., Warren, P. S., Faeth, S. H., & Nilon, C. H. (2010). Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems. BioScience, 60(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6 Sih, A., & Giudice, M. del. (2012a). Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: A behavioural ecology perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1603), 2762-2772. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0216 Sih, A., & Giudice, M. del. (2012b). Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367(1603), 2762–2772. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0216 Sol, D., Griffin, A. S., Bartomeus, I., & Boyce, H. (2011). Exploring or Avoiding Novel Food Resources? The Novelty Conflict in an Invasive Bird. PLOS ONE, 6(5), e19535-. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019535 Sol, D., Timmermans, S., & Lefebvre, L. (2002). Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Animal Behaviour, 63(3), 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1006/ANBE.2001.1953 Solaro, C., & Sarasola, J. H. (2019). Urban living predicts behavioural response in a neotropical raptor. Behavioural Processes, 169, 103995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103995 Szabo, B., Damas-Moreira, I., & Whiting, M. J. (2020). Can Cognitive Ability Give Invasive Species the Means to Succeed? A Review of the Evidence. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 187. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2020.00187 Team Core R. (2021). R: a language and environment for statistical computing (4.1.1). Thorpe, W. (1956). Learning and instinct in animals. Harvard University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1957-02494-000 Tryjanowski, P., Møller, A. P., Morelli, F., Biaduń, W., Brauze, T., Ciach, M., Czechowski, P., Czyz, S., Dulisz, B., Golawski, A., Hetmański, T., Indykiewicz, P., Mitrus, C., Myczko, L., Nowakowski, J. J., Polakowski, M., Takacs, V., Wysocki, D., & Zduniak, P. (2016). Urbanization affects neophilia and risk-taking at bird-feeders. Scientific Reports, 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28575 Uttara, S., Bhuvandas, Nishi., & Aggarwal, Vanita. (2012). Impacts of urbanization on environment. International Journal of Research in Engineering & Applied Sciences, 2(2),1637-1645. Valcarcel, A., & Fernández-Juricic, E. (2009). Antipredator strategies of house finches: are urban habitats safe spots from predators even when humans are around? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63(5), 673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0701-6 Van Horik, J. O., Langley, E. J. G., Whiteside, M. A., & Madden, J. R. (2017). Differential participation in cognitive tests is driven by personality, sex, body condition and experience. Behavioural Processes, 134, 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.07.001 Van Horik, J. O., Langley, E. J. G., Whiteside, M. A., & Madden, J. R. (2019). A single factor explanation for associative learning performance on colour discrimination problems in common pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Intelligence, 74, 53-61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.07.001 Van Horik, J. O., & Madden, J. R. (2016). A problem with problem solving: Motivational traits, but not cognition, predict success on novel operant foraging tasks. Animal Behaviour, 114, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.02.006 Weaver, K. F., Morales, V., Dunn, S. L., Godde, K., & Weaver, P. F. (2017). Pearson’s and Spearman’s Correlation. An Introduction to Statistical Analysis in Research, 435-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119454205.CH10 Webster, S. J., & Lefebvre, L. (2001). Problem solving and neophobia in a columbiform–passeriform assemblage in Barbados. Animal Behaviour, 62(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.172.
type_driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content	Text
publishDate	2022-07-01
date_accessioned	2022-07-01T00:00:00Z
date_available	2022-07-01T00:00:00Z
url	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/view/7520
url_doi	https://doi.org/10.17151/bccm.2022.26.2.6
issn	0123-3068
eissn	2462-8190
doi	10.17151/bccm.2022.26.2.6
citationstartpage	123
citationendpage	141
url2_str_mv	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/download/7520/6604
_version_	1811199624331919360

¿Influyen las características del comportamiento, el cuerpo y el hábitat en el rendimiento cognitivo de Sicalis flaveola? .

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares

¿Influyen las características del comportamiento, el cuerpo y el hábitat en el rendimiento cognitivo de Sicalis flaveola?
.