Titulo:

Verdades antiguas y modernas
.

Sumario:

Este artículo presenta una comparación de las teorías de verdad, y las soluciones a la paradoja del mentiroso, propuestas por Tomas Bradwardino (c. 1290–1349), Jean Buridan (c. 1295–1358), y Alfred Tarski (1901–1983). Además realiza una breve crítica a la posición expuesta por Read en su artículo: The liar and the new T-schema.

Guardado en:

0124-6127

2462-9596

12

2010-01-01

207

227

Discusiones Filosóficas - 2011

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article_715
record_format ojs
spelling Verdades antiguas y modernas
Ancient and modern truths
Este artículo presenta una comparación de las teorías de verdad, y las soluciones a la paradoja del mentiroso, propuestas por Tomas Bradwardino (c. 1290–1349), Jean Buridan (c. 1295–1358), y Alfred Tarski (1901–1983). Además realiza una breve crítica a la posición expuesta por Read en su artículo: The liar and the new T-schema.
This paper undertakes a comparison of theories of truth and the solutions to the paradox of the liar advanced by Thomas Bradwardine (c. 1290–1349), Jean Buridan (c. 1295–1358), and Alfred Tarski (1901–1983). In addition, it offers a brief criticism to Read's point of views as expounded in his paper: The liar and the new T-schema.
Miller, David
Autorreferencia
Bradwardino
Buridan
Tarski
paradoja del mentiroso
método de diagonalización
teoría de la significación
teorías de la verdad
Self-reference
Bradwardine
Buridan
Tarski
paradox of the Liar
diagonalization method
theory of meaning
theories of truth
-
12
18
Núm. 18 , Año 2011 : Enero - Junio
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
2010-01-01
application/pdf
Universidad de Caldas
Discusiones Filosóficas
0124-6127
2462-9596
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/715
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/715
spa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2011
207
227
Bellhouse, D. R. “De Vetula: A Medieval Manuscript Containing Probability Calculations”. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 68, 2000. 123-136. Print.
Black, M. Language and Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1949. Print.
Boyer, C. B. The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development. Nueva Iorque: Hafner Publishing Company, Inc. Reimprimido 1959. Nueva Iorque: Dover Publications, Inc, 1949. Print.
Goldstein, L. “Epimenides and Curry”. Analysis 46, 1986. 117-121. Print.
- - -. “Doubting Thomas: from Bradwardine back to Anon”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 65-85. Print.
Grant, E. “Bradwardine and Galileo: Equality of Velocities in the Void”. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 2, 1965. 344-364. Print.
Miller, D. W. Reseña de Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot. Philosophy 85, 3, 2008. 433-436. Print.
Mills, E. “Scheming and Lying”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 113–128. Print.
Mou, B. “The Enumerative Character of Tarski’s Definition of Truth and Its General Character in a Tarskian System”. Synthese 126, 2001. 91–122. Print.
Panaccio, C. “Restrictionism: A Medieval Approach Revisited”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 229–253. Print.
Quine, W. V. O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. The Philosophical Review 60, 1951. 20-43. Reprinted. From A Logical Point of View. W. V. O. Quine. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1953. 20-46. Print.
Rahman, S., Tulenheimo, T., and Genot, E. Unity, Truth and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2008. Print.
Read, S. L. “The Truth Schema and the Liar”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008a. 3-17. Print.
- - -. “Further Thoughts on Tarski’s T-scheme and the Liar”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008b. 205-225. Print.
- - -. Thomas Bradwardine, “Insolubilia”. Paris, Lovaina, Walpole MA: Peeters, 2010. Print.
Restall, G. “Models for Liars in Bradwardine’s Theory of Truth”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 135–147. Print.
Sandu, G. “Read on the Liar”. Approaching Truth. Essays in Honour of Ilkka Niiniluoto. Eds. Pihlström, S., Raatikainen, P. and Sintonen, M. Londres: College Publications. 2007. 129–140. Print.
Spade, P. V. “Insolubilia and Bradwardine’s Theory of Signification”. Medioevo: Revista di storia delle filosofia medievale 7, 1981. 115–134. Lies, Language and Logic in the Late Middle Ages. Reprinted as chapter IV of P. V. Spade, 1988. Londres: Variorum Reprints.
Tarski, A. “Grundzüge des Systemenkalkül”. Fundamenta Mathematicae 25, 1935–1936. 503–526, and 26. 2. 283–301. Las referencias son a la traducción inglesa. “Foundations of the Calculus of Systems”, capítulo XII, 1956. 342–383. Print.
________. “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 1944. 341-375. Print.
_________. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956. Print.
Wright, C.J. G. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1992. Print.
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/715/638
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Discusiones Filosóficas
title Verdades antiguas y modernas
spellingShingle Verdades antiguas y modernas
Miller, David
Autorreferencia
Bradwardino
Buridan
Tarski
paradoja del mentiroso
método de diagonalización
teoría de la significación
teorías de la verdad
Self-reference
Bradwardine
Buridan
Tarski
paradox of the Liar
diagonalization method
theory of meaning
theories of truth
title_short Verdades antiguas y modernas
title_full Verdades antiguas y modernas
title_fullStr Verdades antiguas y modernas
title_full_unstemmed Verdades antiguas y modernas
title_sort verdades antiguas y modernas
title_eng Ancient and modern truths
description Este artículo presenta una comparación de las teorías de verdad, y las soluciones a la paradoja del mentiroso, propuestas por Tomas Bradwardino (c. 1290–1349), Jean Buridan (c. 1295–1358), y Alfred Tarski (1901–1983). Además realiza una breve crítica a la posición expuesta por Read en su artículo: The liar and the new T-schema.
description_eng This paper undertakes a comparison of theories of truth and the solutions to the paradox of the liar advanced by Thomas Bradwardine (c. 1290–1349), Jean Buridan (c. 1295–1358), and Alfred Tarski (1901–1983). In addition, it offers a brief criticism to Read's point of views as expounded in his paper: The liar and the new T-schema.
author Miller, David
author_facet Miller, David
topicspa_str_mv Autorreferencia
Bradwardino
Buridan
Tarski
paradoja del mentiroso
método de diagonalización
teoría de la significación
teorías de la verdad
topic Autorreferencia
Bradwardino
Buridan
Tarski
paradoja del mentiroso
método de diagonalización
teoría de la significación
teorías de la verdad
Self-reference
Bradwardine
Buridan
Tarski
paradox of the Liar
diagonalization method
theory of meaning
theories of truth
topic_facet Autorreferencia
Bradwardino
Buridan
Tarski
paradoja del mentiroso
método de diagonalización
teoría de la significación
teorías de la verdad
Self-reference
Bradwardine
Buridan
Tarski
paradox of the Liar
diagonalization method
theory of meaning
theories of truth
citationvolume 12
citationissue 18
citationedition Núm. 18 , Año 2011 : Enero - Junio
publisher Universidad de Caldas
ispartofjournal Discusiones Filosóficas
source https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/715
language spa
format Article
rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2011
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references Bellhouse, D. R. “De Vetula: A Medieval Manuscript Containing Probability Calculations”. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 68, 2000. 123-136. Print.
Black, M. Language and Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1949. Print.
Boyer, C. B. The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development. Nueva Iorque: Hafner Publishing Company, Inc. Reimprimido 1959. Nueva Iorque: Dover Publications, Inc, 1949. Print.
Goldstein, L. “Epimenides and Curry”. Analysis 46, 1986. 117-121. Print.
- - -. “Doubting Thomas: from Bradwardine back to Anon”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 65-85. Print.
Grant, E. “Bradwardine and Galileo: Equality of Velocities in the Void”. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 2, 1965. 344-364. Print.
Miller, D. W. Reseña de Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot. Philosophy 85, 3, 2008. 433-436. Print.
Mills, E. “Scheming and Lying”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 113–128. Print.
Mou, B. “The Enumerative Character of Tarski’s Definition of Truth and Its General Character in a Tarskian System”. Synthese 126, 2001. 91–122. Print.
Panaccio, C. “Restrictionism: A Medieval Approach Revisited”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 229–253. Print.
Quine, W. V. O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. The Philosophical Review 60, 1951. 20-43. Reprinted. From A Logical Point of View. W. V. O. Quine. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1953. 20-46. Print.
Rahman, S., Tulenheimo, T., and Genot, E. Unity, Truth and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2008. Print.
Read, S. L. “The Truth Schema and the Liar”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008a. 3-17. Print.
- - -. “Further Thoughts on Tarski’s T-scheme and the Liar”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008b. 205-225. Print.
- - -. Thomas Bradwardine, “Insolubilia”. Paris, Lovaina, Walpole MA: Peeters, 2010. Print.
Restall, G. “Models for Liars in Bradwardine’s Theory of Truth”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 135–147. Print.
Sandu, G. “Read on the Liar”. Approaching Truth. Essays in Honour of Ilkka Niiniluoto. Eds. Pihlström, S., Raatikainen, P. and Sintonen, M. Londres: College Publications. 2007. 129–140. Print.
Spade, P. V. “Insolubilia and Bradwardine’s Theory of Signification”. Medioevo: Revista di storia delle filosofia medievale 7, 1981. 115–134. Lies, Language and Logic in the Late Middle Ages. Reprinted as chapter IV of P. V. Spade, 1988. Londres: Variorum Reprints.
Tarski, A. “Grundzüge des Systemenkalkül”. Fundamenta Mathematicae 25, 1935–1936. 503–526, and 26. 2. 283–301. Las referencias son a la traducción inglesa. “Foundations of the Calculus of Systems”, capítulo XII, 1956. 342–383. Print.
________. “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 1944. 341-375. Print.
_________. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956. Print.
Wright, C.J. G. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1992. Print.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2010-01-01
date_accessioned 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/715
url_doi https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/715
issn 0124-6127
eissn 2462-9596
citationstartpage 207
citationendpage 227
url2_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/715/638
_version_ 1811199592951185408