Titulo:

John Rawls: a liberdade dos antigos e a liberdade dos modernos – pressupostos da justificação coerentista
.

Sumario:

-

Guardado en:

0124-6127

2462-9596

11

2010-07-01

151

165

Discusiones Filosóficas - 2010

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article_566
record_format ojs
spelling John Rawls: a liberdade dos antigos e a liberdade dos modernos – pressupostos da justificação coerentista
John Rawls: the liberty of ancients and the liberty of moderns-presuppositions of coherentist justification
-
The emphasis in the individual freedom and the equality of all citizens as it appears in the two Rawlsian principles of justice causes that justice as fairness be part of an articulation between the individual freedom and the collective one as explicitly seen in the two moral faculties contained in the conception of person of the Rawlsian theory, that is, in the idea of rationality and in the conception of reasonableness. Therefore, Rawls elaborates an articulation between the public and the private inserting justice as fairness in such a way that he is able to integrate the old tradition of freedom as well as the modern one. In justice as fairness, the use of the method of reflective equilibrium, autonomy, freedom, the normative concept of person, pure procedimentalism, the lexicographical order attributed to the first principle, the political conception of justice and the public base of justification, show that Rawls considers the freedom of the ancients in the view of the freedom of the moderns and, on the basis of this argument, provides strong conceptual support for his model of justification: a coherentist one.
Gondim, Elnora
-
freedom
ancients
moderns
coherentism
liberdade
antigos
modernos
coerentismo
11
17
Núm. 17 , Año 2010 : Julio - Diciembre
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2010-07-01T00:00:00Z
2010-07-01T00:00:00Z
2010-07-01
application/pdf
Universidad de Caldas
Discusiones Filosóficas
0124-6127
2462-9596
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/566
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/566
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2010
151
165
BONELLA, Alcino E. (2000). Justiça como imparcialidade e contratualismo. Campinas, IFCH- Unicamp (Tese de Doutorado).
BORON, Atilio A. Filosofia política moderna: de Hobbes a Marx. [on line] http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/ar/libros/secret/filopolmpt/filopolmpt.html
BRINK, David O. (1989). Moral Realism and The Foundations of Ethics.New York: Cambridge University Press.
CONSTANT, Benjamin. (1985). “Da liberdade dos antigos comparada à liberdade dos modernos”. In: Filosofia Política. Porto Alegre: LPM Editores.
DANIELS, Norman. (1996). Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice, New York: Cambridge University Press.
GETTIER, Edmund. (1963). “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” In: Analysis No. 23.
GONDIM, Elnora & MARRA, Osvaldino. (2008). “Rawls e a herança de Hobbes: convergências e divergências – um esboço”. In: Revista Intuitio, vol. I, no. 1, Porto Alegre.
KYMLICKA, Will. (2006). Filosofia Política Contemporânea. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
LOCKE, John. (1994). “Segundo Tratado Sobre o Governo Civil: e outros escritos”. In: Clássicos do Pensamento Político. Petrópolis: Vozes
OLIVEIRA, Manfredo. (1993). Ética e Sociabilidade. São Paulo: Loyola.
OLIVEIRA, Nythamar Fernandes. (1999). “Hobbes, Liberalismo e Contratualismo”. In: id. Tractatus ethico-politicus. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs.
________. (2003). Rawls. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
O’NEIL, Onora. (2006). Em direção à Justiça e à Virtude: uma exposição construtiva do raciocínio prático. São Leopoldo: Unisinos.
RAWLS, John. (1997). Uma Teoria da Justiça. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
________. (2003). Justiça como Equidade: uma reformulação. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
________. (1998). Justiça e Democracia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
________. (2000). O Liberalismo Político. São Paulo: Ática.
________. (1999). Collected Papers.(org. Samuel Freeman). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
RICOEUR, Paul. (1997). O Justo ou a Essência da Justiça. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget.
ROUSSEAU. (1978). “Do contrato social”. In: Coleção Os Pensadores. São Paulo: Abril Cultural.
SILVEIRA, Denis Coitinho. (2007). “Teoria da justiça de John Rawls: entre o liberalismo e o comunitarismo”. In: Trans/Form/Ação, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 169-190.
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/566/491
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Discusiones Filosóficas
title John Rawls: a liberdade dos antigos e a liberdade dos modernos – pressupostos da justificação coerentista
spellingShingle John Rawls: a liberdade dos antigos e a liberdade dos modernos – pressupostos da justificação coerentista
Gondim, Elnora
freedom
ancients
moderns
coherentism
liberdade
antigos
modernos
coerentismo
title_short John Rawls: a liberdade dos antigos e a liberdade dos modernos – pressupostos da justificação coerentista
title_full John Rawls: a liberdade dos antigos e a liberdade dos modernos – pressupostos da justificação coerentista
title_fullStr John Rawls: a liberdade dos antigos e a liberdade dos modernos – pressupostos da justificação coerentista
title_full_unstemmed John Rawls: a liberdade dos antigos e a liberdade dos modernos – pressupostos da justificação coerentista
title_sort john rawls: a liberdade dos antigos e a liberdade dos modernos – pressupostos da justificação coerentista
title_eng John Rawls: the liberty of ancients and the liberty of moderns-presuppositions of coherentist justification
description -
description_eng The emphasis in the individual freedom and the equality of all citizens as it appears in the two Rawlsian principles of justice causes that justice as fairness be part of an articulation between the individual freedom and the collective one as explicitly seen in the two moral faculties contained in the conception of person of the Rawlsian theory, that is, in the idea of rationality and in the conception of reasonableness. Therefore, Rawls elaborates an articulation between the public and the private inserting justice as fairness in such a way that he is able to integrate the old tradition of freedom as well as the modern one. In justice as fairness, the use of the method of reflective equilibrium, autonomy, freedom, the normative concept of person, pure procedimentalism, the lexicographical order attributed to the first principle, the political conception of justice and the public base of justification, show that Rawls considers the freedom of the ancients in the view of the freedom of the moderns and, on the basis of this argument, provides strong conceptual support for his model of justification: a coherentist one.
author Gondim, Elnora
author_facet Gondim, Elnora
topic freedom
ancients
moderns
coherentism
liberdade
antigos
modernos
coerentismo
topic_facet freedom
ancients
moderns
coherentism
liberdade
antigos
modernos
coerentismo
citationvolume 11
citationissue 17
citationedition Núm. 17 , Año 2010 : Julio - Diciembre
publisher Universidad de Caldas
ispartofjournal Discusiones Filosóficas
source https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/566
language
format Article
rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2010
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2010-07-01
date_accessioned 2010-07-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2010-07-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/566
url_doi https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/566
issn 0124-6127
eissn 2462-9596
citationstartpage 151
citationendpage 165
url2_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/566/491
_version_ 1811199574729031680