Titulo:
Quine y el pragmatismo clásico
.
Sumario:
A menudo se asocia a Quine con los filósofos pragmatistas o al menos se le atribuye una posición consonante con el pragmatismo. En el presente ensayo examino la relación entre la obra de Quine y la de los pragmatistas clásicos: Peirce, James y Dewey. El recorrido por los escritos de Quine mostrará varias similitudes con la doctrina de los límites de la experiencia propuesta por James, y al mismo tiempo diferencias significativas con el naturalismo de Dewey y el pragmatismo de Peirce. El balance de este recorrido es que aunque existen algunos elementos en común entre los pragmatistas clásicos y Quine, es imposible afirmar que haya existido un interés de parte de Quine de asumir como propias las tesis pragmatistas para desarrollarlas en direc... Ver más
Guardado en:
0124-6127
2462-9596
11
2009-01-01
59
79
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2010
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article_546 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Quine y el pragmatismo clásico Quine and classic pragmatism A menudo se asocia a Quine con los filósofos pragmatistas o al menos se le atribuye una posición consonante con el pragmatismo. En el presente ensayo examino la relación entre la obra de Quine y la de los pragmatistas clásicos: Peirce, James y Dewey. El recorrido por los escritos de Quine mostrará varias similitudes con la doctrina de los límites de la experiencia propuesta por James, y al mismo tiempo diferencias significativas con el naturalismo de Dewey y el pragmatismo de Peirce. El balance de este recorrido es que aunque existen algunos elementos en común entre los pragmatistas clásicos y Quine, es imposible afirmar que haya existido un interés de parte de Quine de asumir como propias las tesis pragmatistas para desarrollarlas en direcciones novedosas. Quine has often been associated with the Pragmatists or at the very least his work has been found to be consonant with Pragmatism. In this essay I examine the relation between Quine's work and that of the classical pragmatists: Peirce, James, and Dewey. My study of Quine's writings will reveal several similarities with James' doctrine of the limits of experience, and at the same time it will bring to light significant differences with Dewey's naturalism and Peirce's Pragmatism. On balance, although there are some elements in common between the classical Pragmatists and Quine, it is not possible to assert that there ever was any interest on Quine's part to adopt the theses of the Pragmatists in order to develop them in novel directions. Páez, Andrés Quine Pragmatismo Carnap Naturalismo Quine Pragmatism Carnap Naturalism - 11 16 Núm. 16 , Año 2010 : Enero - Junio Artículo de revista Journal article 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z 2009-01-01 application/pdf Universidad de Caldas Discusiones Filosóficas 0124-6127 2462-9596 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/546 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/546 spa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Discusiones Filosóficas - 2010 59 79 BERGSTRÖM, L. & FØLLESDAL, D. (2001). Interview with Willard Van Orman Quine in November 1993. En: FØLLESDAL, D. (Ed.). Philosophy of Quine, Volume 1: General, Reviews, and Analytic/Synthetic. New York: Garland. CARNAP, R. (1950/1956). Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology. En: Meaning and Necessity. 2nd enlarged edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DEWEY, J. (1929). Experience and Nature. Chicago: Open Court. HAACK, Susan. (2004). Pragmatism, Old and New. En: Contemporary Pragmatism. vol.1, no.1, p. 3-41. HARRIS, J. F. (1992). Against Relativism: A Philosophical Defense of Method. La Salle: Open Court. HAY, W. H. (1968). Lewis’ Relation to Logical Empiricism. En: SCHILPP, P. A. (Ed.). The Philosophy of C.I. Lewis. Chicago: Open Court HOOKWAY, Christopher. (1988). Quine: Lenguage, Experience and Reality. Stanford: Stanford University Press. JAMES, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt. ________. (1897/1956). The Will to Believe. En: The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. New York: Dover. ________. (1907). Pragmatism. New York: Longmans, Green and Co. KOSKINEN, H. J. & PIHLSTRÖM, S. (2006). Quine and Pragmatism. En: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. vol.42, no. 6, p. 309-346. LEPORE, E. (2004). An Interview with Donald Davidson. En: DAVIDSON, D. Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. LEWIS, C. I. (1929). Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. New York: Charles Scribners. ________. (1946). An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. La Salle: Open Court. MORRIS, C. (1963). Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism. En: SCHILPP, P. A. (Ed.). The Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap. Chicago: Open Court, 1963. PEIRCE, C. S. (1878/1998). How to Make Our Ideas Clear. En: The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 1. Edited by The Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ________. (1903/1998). What Pragmatism Is. En: The Essential Peirce, Vol. 2. Edited by The Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. PUTNAM, H. (1994). “A Comparison of Something with Something Else”. En: Words and Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1995). Pragmatism, An Open Question. Oxford: Blackwell. QUINE, W. V. (1933). “Review of Peirce’s Collected Papers, Volume 2”. En: Isis 19. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 220-229. ________. (1935a). Review of Peirce’s Collected Papers, Volume 3. En: Isis. vol. 22, p. 285-297. ________. (1935b). Review of Peirce’s Collected Papers, Volume 4. En: Isis. vol. 22, p. 551-553. ________. (1953a). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. En: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1953b). Reference and Modality. En: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1953c). Identity, Ostension, and Hypostasis. En: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1969a). Natural Kinds. En: Ontological Relativity & Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press. ________. (1969b). Preface to Ontological Relativity & Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press. ________. (1976). Homage to Rudolph Carnap. En: Ways of Paradox. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1981). Things and Their Place in Theories. En: Theories and Things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1991). Two Dogmas in Retrospect. En: Canadian Journal of Philosophy. vol. 21, p. 265-274. ________. (1995). Peirce’s Logic. En: Selected Logic Papers. Enlarged edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1998). Autobiography of W. V. Quine. En: HAHN, E. y SCHILPP, P. A. (Eds.). The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. 2a. ed. Perú: Open Court. TOMIDA, Y. (1993). Interview Between W. V. Quine and Yasuhiko Tomida. En: Willard Van Orman Quine home page by Douglas Quine. [Disponible en]: http://www.wvquine.org/quine-tomida.html. https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/546/471 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Discusiones Filosóficas |
| title |
Quine y el pragmatismo clásico |
| spellingShingle |
Quine y el pragmatismo clásico Páez, Andrés Quine Pragmatismo Carnap Naturalismo Quine Pragmatism Carnap Naturalism |
| title_short |
Quine y el pragmatismo clásico |
| title_full |
Quine y el pragmatismo clásico |
| title_fullStr |
Quine y el pragmatismo clásico |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Quine y el pragmatismo clásico |
| title_sort |
quine y el pragmatismo clásico |
| title_eng |
Quine and classic pragmatism |
| description |
A menudo se asocia a Quine con los filósofos pragmatistas o al menos se le atribuye una posición consonante con el pragmatismo. En el presente ensayo examino la relación entre la obra de Quine y la de los pragmatistas clásicos: Peirce, James y Dewey. El recorrido por los escritos de Quine mostrará varias similitudes con la doctrina de los límites de la experiencia propuesta por James, y al mismo tiempo diferencias significativas con el naturalismo de Dewey y el pragmatismo de Peirce. El balance de este recorrido es que aunque existen algunos elementos en común entre los pragmatistas clásicos y Quine, es imposible afirmar que haya existido un interés de parte de Quine de asumir como propias las tesis pragmatistas para desarrollarlas en direcciones novedosas.
|
| description_eng |
Quine has often been associated with the Pragmatists or at the very least his work has been found to be consonant with Pragmatism. In this essay I examine the relation between Quine's work and that of the classical pragmatists: Peirce, James, and Dewey. My study of Quine's writings will reveal several similarities with James' doctrine of the limits of experience, and at the same time it will bring to light significant differences with Dewey's naturalism and Peirce's Pragmatism. On balance, although there are some elements in common between the classical Pragmatists and Quine, it is not possible to assert that there ever was any interest on Quine's part to adopt the theses of the Pragmatists in order to develop them in novel directions.
|
| author |
Páez, Andrés |
| author_facet |
Páez, Andrés |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Quine Pragmatismo Carnap Naturalismo |
| topic |
Quine Pragmatismo Carnap Naturalismo Quine Pragmatism Carnap Naturalism |
| topic_facet |
Quine Pragmatismo Carnap Naturalismo Quine Pragmatism Carnap Naturalism |
| citationvolume |
11 |
| citationissue |
16 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 16 , Año 2010 : Enero - Junio |
| publisher |
Universidad de Caldas |
| ispartofjournal |
Discusiones Filosóficas |
| source |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/546 |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Discusiones Filosóficas - 2010 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references |
BERGSTRÖM, L. & FØLLESDAL, D. (2001). Interview with Willard Van Orman Quine in November 1993. En: FØLLESDAL, D. (Ed.). Philosophy of Quine, Volume 1: General, Reviews, and Analytic/Synthetic. New York: Garland. CARNAP, R. (1950/1956). Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology. En: Meaning and Necessity. 2nd enlarged edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DEWEY, J. (1929). Experience and Nature. Chicago: Open Court. HAACK, Susan. (2004). Pragmatism, Old and New. En: Contemporary Pragmatism. vol.1, no.1, p. 3-41. HARRIS, J. F. (1992). Against Relativism: A Philosophical Defense of Method. La Salle: Open Court. HAY, W. H. (1968). Lewis’ Relation to Logical Empiricism. En: SCHILPP, P. A. (Ed.). The Philosophy of C.I. Lewis. Chicago: Open Court HOOKWAY, Christopher. (1988). Quine: Lenguage, Experience and Reality. Stanford: Stanford University Press. JAMES, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt. ________. (1897/1956). The Will to Believe. En: The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. New York: Dover. ________. (1907). Pragmatism. New York: Longmans, Green and Co. KOSKINEN, H. J. & PIHLSTRÖM, S. (2006). Quine and Pragmatism. En: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. vol.42, no. 6, p. 309-346. LEPORE, E. (2004). An Interview with Donald Davidson. En: DAVIDSON, D. Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. LEWIS, C. I. (1929). Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. New York: Charles Scribners. ________. (1946). An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. La Salle: Open Court. MORRIS, C. (1963). Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism. En: SCHILPP, P. A. (Ed.). The Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap. Chicago: Open Court, 1963. PEIRCE, C. S. (1878/1998). How to Make Our Ideas Clear. En: The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 1. Edited by The Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ________. (1903/1998). What Pragmatism Is. En: The Essential Peirce, Vol. 2. Edited by The Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. PUTNAM, H. (1994). “A Comparison of Something with Something Else”. En: Words and Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1995). Pragmatism, An Open Question. Oxford: Blackwell. QUINE, W. V. (1933). “Review of Peirce’s Collected Papers, Volume 2”. En: Isis 19. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 220-229. ________. (1935a). Review of Peirce’s Collected Papers, Volume 3. En: Isis. vol. 22, p. 285-297. ________. (1935b). Review of Peirce’s Collected Papers, Volume 4. En: Isis. vol. 22, p. 551-553. ________. (1953a). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. En: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1953b). Reference and Modality. En: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1953c). Identity, Ostension, and Hypostasis. En: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1969a). Natural Kinds. En: Ontological Relativity & Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press. ________. (1969b). Preface to Ontological Relativity & Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press. ________. (1976). Homage to Rudolph Carnap. En: Ways of Paradox. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1981). Things and Their Place in Theories. En: Theories and Things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1991). Two Dogmas in Retrospect. En: Canadian Journal of Philosophy. vol. 21, p. 265-274. ________. (1995). Peirce’s Logic. En: Selected Logic Papers. Enlarged edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ________. (1998). Autobiography of W. V. Quine. En: HAHN, E. y SCHILPP, P. A. (Eds.). The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. 2a. ed. Perú: Open Court. TOMIDA, Y. (1993). Interview Between W. V. Quine and Yasuhiko Tomida. En: Willard Van Orman Quine home page by Douglas Quine. [Disponible en]: http://www.wvquine.org/quine-tomida.html. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2009-01-01 |
| date_accessioned |
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/546 |
| url_doi |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/546 |
| issn |
0124-6127 |
| eissn |
2462-9596 |
| citationstartpage |
59 |
| citationendpage |
79 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/546/471 |
| _version_ |
1811199572363444224 |