Importancia de la interacción hombre-animal durante el presacrificio bovino: Revisión
Titulo:

Importancia de la interacción hombre-animal durante el presacrificio bovino: Revisión
.

Sumario:

Colombia ha adoptado en su legislación sanitaria los lineamientos de bienestar animal recomendados por la Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal (OIE) en la cadena logística bovina. Sin embargo, la interacción hombre-animal en las plantas de beneficio suele ser deficiente, porque es frecuente el uso de métodos cruentos para manejar los bovinos. Este tipo de interacción tiene consecuencias negativas para la industria, como aumento de la mortalidad del ganado por distrés, decomisos por contusiones, presentación de carne de menor calidad, mayores costos del proceso y riesgos laborales para los manejadores, entre otras. El objetivo de la presente revisión consistió en describir las características de la relación entre los manejadores y los anim... Ver más

Guardado en:

Biosalud

1657-9550

2462-960X

Cobo A., Claudia G.

Romero P., Marlyn H.

UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS

11

2022-03-17

79

91

Colombia

interacción hombre-animal

presacrificio

comportamiento

bienestar animal

ganado bovino

Revista Biosalud - 2012

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article_4718
record_format ojs
spelling Importancia de la interacción hombre-animal durante el presacrificio bovino: Revisión
Importance of man-animal interaction during cattle pre-slaughter: Review
Colombia ha adoptado en su legislación sanitaria los lineamientos de bienestar animal recomendados por la Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal (OIE) en la cadena logística bovina. Sin embargo, la interacción hombre-animal en las plantas de beneficio suele ser deficiente, porque es frecuente el uso de métodos cruentos para manejar los bovinos. Este tipo de interacción tiene consecuencias negativas para la industria, como aumento de la mortalidad del ganado por distrés, decomisos por contusiones, presentación de carne de menor calidad, mayores costos del proceso y riesgos laborales para los manejadores, entre otras. El objetivo de la presente revisión consistió en describir las características de la relación entre los manejadores y los animales durante el presacrificio bovino, analizar sus implicaciones en la cadena logística bovina, conocer la metodología utilizada para evaluar la interacción hombre-animal y presentar estrategias que permitan su mejoramiento.
Colombia has adopted in the sanitary legislation the animal welfare guidelines recommended by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), in the bovine logistics chain. However, it usually happens that the man-animal interaction in the slaughterhouses is poor, because of the use of cruel methods to handle cattle is frequent. This type of interaction has negative consequences for the industry, such as the increase of livestock mortality due to distress, confiscation because of contusions, presentation of lower meat quality, increased processing costs and occupational risks for the handlers, among others. The objective of this review was to describe the characteristics of the relationship between the handlers and the animals during cattle pre-slaughter, to analyze its implications in the bovine logistic chain, to know the methodology used to assess man-animal interaction, and to present strategies that allow its improvement.
Cobo A., Claudia G.
Romero P., Marlyn H.
interacción hombre-animal
presacrificio
comportamiento
bienestar animal
ganado bovino
man-animal interaction
pre-slaughter
behavior
animal welfare
cattle
11
2
Núm. 2 , Año 2012 : Julio - Diciembre
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2022-03-17T00:36:43Z
2022-03-17T00:36:43Z
2022-03-17
application/pdf
Universidad de Caldas
Biosalud
1657-9550
2462-960X
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/biosalud/article/view/4718
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/biosalud/article/view/4718
spa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Revista Biosalud - 2012
79
91
Romero MH, Sánchez JA. Implicaciones de la inclusión del bienestar animal en la legislación sanitaria colombiana. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2011; 24:93-101.
Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural [Internet]. Documento Conpes 3376 de 2010. Disponible en: http://www.minagricultura.gov.co/archivos/conpes_3676_politica_sanitaria.pdf Consultado Agosto de 2011.
Hemsworth PH, Rice M, Karlen MG, Calleja L, Barnett JL, Nash J, et al. Human-animal interactions at abattoirs: Relationships between handling and animal stress in sheep and cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011; 135:24-33.
Romero MH, Sánchez JA, Gutiérrez, C. Evaluación de prácticas de bienestar animal durante el transporte de bovinos para sacrificio. Rev. salud pública 2011b; 13(4):684-690.
Miranda-de la Lama GC, Leyva IG, Barreras-Serrano A, Pérez-Linares C, Sánchez-López E, María G.A, et al. Assessment of cattle welfare at a commercial slaughter plant in the northwest of Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod 2012; 44(3):497-504.
Hemsworth PH, Rice M, Karlen MG, Calleja L, Barnett, JL. Science and its application in assessing the welfare of laying hens. Aust. Vet. J. 2003; 81:615-624.
Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, van der Werf JTN, Schilder MBH, Knaap JH, Barneveld A, et al. Heart rate and heart rate variability during a novel object test and handling test in young horses. Physiol Behav 2002; 76:289-296.
Waiblinger S, Menke C, Folsch DW. Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy cows towards humans on 35 farms. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003; 84:23-39.
Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedesen V, Tosi MV, Janczak A, Visser K, et al. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2006; 101(1):85-242.
Hemsworth PH, Coleman G, Barnett JL, Borg S. Relationships between human–animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 2000; 8:2821-2831.
Breuer K, Hemsworth P, Coleman GJ. The effect of positive or negative handling on the behavioural and physiological responses of non lactating heifers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003; 84:3-22.
Boivin X, Tournadre H, Le Neindre P. Hand-feeding and gentling influence early-weaned lambs’ attachment responses to their stockperson. J. Anim. Sci. 2000; 78:879-884.
Waiblinger S, Menke C, Korff J, Bucher A. Previous handling and gentle interactions affect behavior and heart rate of dairy cows during a veterinary procedure. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004; 85:31-42.
Romero M, Sánchez J. Bienestar animal durante el transporte y su relación con la calidad de la carne bovina. Rev. MVZ Córdoba 2012; 17(1):2936-2944.
Coleman G, McGregor M, Hemsworth PH, Boyce J, Dowling S. The relationship between beliefs, attitudes and observed behaviours of abattoir personnel in the pig industry. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003; 82:189-200.
Seabrook MF. The effect of the operational environment and operating protocols on the attitudes and behaviour of employees stockpersons. Human–animal relationship: stockmanship and housing in organic livestock systems. In: Hovi M, Bouilhol M, editors. Proceedings of the Third NAHWOA Workshop, University of Reading, Clermont-Ferrand, 21-24 October 2000. p. 23-32.
Romero MH, Sánchez J. Bienestar animal durante el transporte y su relación con la calidad de la carne bovina. Animal welfare during transport and its relationship with meat quality. Rev MVZ Córd. 2012; 17(1):2936-2944.
Romero MH, Sánchez JA, Gutiérrez C. Evaluación de prácticas de bienestar animal durante el transporte de bovinos para sacrificio. Rev. Salud Pública 2011; 13(4):684-690.
Romero MH, Uribe LF, Sánchez JA. Biomarcadores de estrés como indicadores de bienestar animal en ganado de carne. Biosalud 2011; 10(1):71-87.
Kaltas, GA, Chrousos GP. 2007. The neuroendorinology of stress. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG, editors. Handbook of Psychophysiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 303-318.
Amtmann VA, Gallo C, van Schaik G, Tadich N. Relaciones entre el manejo ante-mortem, variables sanguíneas indicadoras de estrés y pH de la canal en novillos. Arch Med Vet 2006; 38(3):259-264.
Romero MH, Paranhos da Costa MJR, Sánchez JA. Bienestar animal: un compromiso de la cadena cárnica bovina. Biosalud 2011; 10(2):71-86.
Strappini AC, Frankena K, Metz, JHM, Gallo C, Kemp B. Characteristics of bruises in carcasses of cows sourced from farms or from livestock markets. Animal journal 2012; 6(3):502-509.
Strappini AC, Frankena K, Metz JHM, Gallo B, Kemp B. Prevalence and risk factors for bruises in Chilean bovine carcasses. Meat Sci 2010; 86:859-864.
Nanni Costa L, Lo Fiego DP, Tassone F, Russo V. The relationship between carcass bruising in bulls and behaviour observed during pre-slaughter phases. Veterinary Research Communications 200; 30:379-381.
Romero MH, Gutiérrez C, Sánchez J. Evaluation of bruises as an animal welfare indicator during preslaughter of beef cattle. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2012; 25:267-275.
Gallo, C. Using scientific evidence to inform public policy on the long distance transportation of animals in South America. Veterinaria Italiana 2008; 44(1):113-120.
Gallo C, Lizondo G, Knowles G. Effects of journey and lairage time on steers transported to slaughter in Chile. Vet Rec 2003; 152:361-364.
Leyva-García IA, Figueroa-Saavedra F, Sánchez-López E, Pérez-Linares C, Barreras-Serrano A. Impacto económico de la presencia de carne DFD en una planta de sacrificio Tipo Inspección Federal (TIF). Arch Med Vet 2012; 44:39-42.
Lensink J, Fernández X, Cozzi G, Florand L, Veissier I. The influence of farmers’ behavior on calves’ reactions to transport and quality of veal meat. J. Anim. Sci. 2001; 79:642-652.
Paranhos da Costa MJR. Ambiência na produção de bovinos de corte a pasto. Anais de Etologia 2000; 18:26-42.
Miranda-de la Lama GC, Mattiello S. The importance of social behaviour for goat welfare in livestock farming. Small Rumin Res 2009; 90:1-10.
Maria GA, Villarroel M, Chacon G, Gebresenet G. Scoring system for evaluating the stress to cattle of commercial loading and unloading. Vet Rec 2004; 154:818-821.
Bourguet C, Deiss V, Boissy A, Andanson S, Terlouw EMC. Effects of feed deprivation on behavioral reactivity and physiological status in Holstein cattle. J of Anim Sci 2011; 88:3272-3285.
Grandin T. Recommended Animal Handling Guidelines & Audit Guide: A Systematic Approach to Animal Welfare. AMI Foundation. Agosto de 2012. 121 p.
Dohoo I, Wayne M, Henrik S. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. 2a edition; 2009.
Szklo M, Nieto J. Epidemiología intermedia, conceptos y aplicaciones. Madrid: Díaz de Santos; 2003. p. 103-130.
Hemsworth PH. Human–animal interactions in livestock production. Appl. Anim. Beh. Sci. 2003; 81:185-198.
Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, Hopster H, Schilder MB, Knaap JH, Barneveld A, et al. Quantifying aspects of young horses’ temperament: consistency of behavioural variables. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001; 74:241-258.
Krohn C, Jago JG, Boivin X. The effect of early handling on the socialisation of young calves to humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001; 74:121-133.
Romero MH, Uribe LF, Sánchez JA. El transporte terrestre de bovinos y sus implicaciones en el bienestar animal: Revisión. Biosalud 2010; 9(2):67-82.
Boivin X, Garel JP, Durier C, Le Neindre P. Is gentling by people rewarding for beef calves? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998; 61:1-12.
Lensink J, Fernández X, Boivin X, Pradel P, LeNeindre P, Veissier I. The impact of gentle contacts on ease of handling, welfare, and growth of calves and on quality of veal meat. J Anim Sci 2000; 78:1219-1226.
Krohn C, Boivin X, Jago JG. The presence of the dam during handling prevents the socialization of young calves to humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003; 80:263-265.
Lensink J, Boivin X, Pradel P, LeNeindre, P Veissier I. Reducing veal calves’ reactivity to people by providing additional human contact. J. Anim. Sci. 2000; 78:1213-1218.
Lensink J, Raussi S, Boivin X, Pyykkonen M, Veissier I. Reactions of calves to handling depend on housing conditions and previous experience with humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001; 70:187-199.
Lensink J, Fernández X, Cozzi G, Florand L, Veissier I. The influence of farmers’ behavior on calves’ reactions to transport and quality of veal meat. J. Anim. Sci. 2001; 79:642-652.
Munksgaard L, De Passille´ AM, Rushen J, Herskin MS, Kristensen AM. Dairy cows’ fear of people: social learning, milk yield and behaviour at milking. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001; 73:15-26.
Ministerio de la Protección Social. Decreto 1500, mayo 4 de 2007.
Ministerio de la Protección Social. Resolución 2905, agosto 22 de 2007.
Gavinelli A, Ferrara M, Simonin D. Formulating policies for the welfare of animals during long distance transportation. Vet Ital 2008; 44(1):71-86.
Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Haley DB, Church S, Woods J, O´byrne T. An education and training programme for livestock transporters in Canada. Vet Ital 2008; 44(1):273-283.
Edge MK, Barnett JL. Development of animal welfare standards for the livestock transport industry: process, challenges, and implementation. J Vet Behav 2009; 4:187-192.
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/biosalud/article/download/4718/4306
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREV
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Biosalud
title Importancia de la interacción hombre-animal durante el presacrificio bovino: Revisión
spellingShingle Importancia de la interacción hombre-animal durante el presacrificio bovino: Revisión
Cobo A., Claudia G.
Romero P., Marlyn H.
interacción hombre-animal
presacrificio
comportamiento
bienestar animal
ganado bovino
man-animal interaction
pre-slaughter
behavior
animal welfare
cattle
title_short Importancia de la interacción hombre-animal durante el presacrificio bovino: Revisión
title_full Importancia de la interacción hombre-animal durante el presacrificio bovino: Revisión
title_fullStr Importancia de la interacción hombre-animal durante el presacrificio bovino: Revisión
title_full_unstemmed Importancia de la interacción hombre-animal durante el presacrificio bovino: Revisión
title_sort importancia de la interacción hombre-animal durante el presacrificio bovino: revisión
title_eng Importance of man-animal interaction during cattle pre-slaughter: Review
description Colombia ha adoptado en su legislación sanitaria los lineamientos de bienestar animal recomendados por la Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal (OIE) en la cadena logística bovina. Sin embargo, la interacción hombre-animal en las plantas de beneficio suele ser deficiente, porque es frecuente el uso de métodos cruentos para manejar los bovinos. Este tipo de interacción tiene consecuencias negativas para la industria, como aumento de la mortalidad del ganado por distrés, decomisos por contusiones, presentación de carne de menor calidad, mayores costos del proceso y riesgos laborales para los manejadores, entre otras. El objetivo de la presente revisión consistió en describir las características de la relación entre los manejadores y los animales durante el presacrificio bovino, analizar sus implicaciones en la cadena logística bovina, conocer la metodología utilizada para evaluar la interacción hombre-animal y presentar estrategias que permitan su mejoramiento.
description_eng Colombia has adopted in the sanitary legislation the animal welfare guidelines recommended by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), in the bovine logistics chain. However, it usually happens that the man-animal interaction in the slaughterhouses is poor, because of the use of cruel methods to handle cattle is frequent. This type of interaction has negative consequences for the industry, such as the increase of livestock mortality due to distress, confiscation because of contusions, presentation of lower meat quality, increased processing costs and occupational risks for the handlers, among others. The objective of this review was to describe the characteristics of the relationship between the handlers and the animals during cattle pre-slaughter, to analyze its implications in the bovine logistic chain, to know the methodology used to assess man-animal interaction, and to present strategies that allow its improvement.
author Cobo A., Claudia G.
Romero P., Marlyn H.
author_facet Cobo A., Claudia G.
Romero P., Marlyn H.
topicspa_str_mv interacción hombre-animal
presacrificio
comportamiento
bienestar animal
ganado bovino
topic interacción hombre-animal
presacrificio
comportamiento
bienestar animal
ganado bovino
man-animal interaction
pre-slaughter
behavior
animal welfare
cattle
topic_facet interacción hombre-animal
presacrificio
comportamiento
bienestar animal
ganado bovino
man-animal interaction
pre-slaughter
behavior
animal welfare
cattle
citationvolume 11
citationissue 2
citationedition Núm. 2 , Año 2012 : Julio - Diciembre
publisher Universidad de Caldas
ispartofjournal Biosalud
source https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/biosalud/article/view/4718
language spa
format Article
rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Revista Biosalud - 2012
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references Romero MH, Sánchez JA. Implicaciones de la inclusión del bienestar animal en la legislación sanitaria colombiana. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2011; 24:93-101.
Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural [Internet]. Documento Conpes 3376 de 2010. Disponible en: http://www.minagricultura.gov.co/archivos/conpes_3676_politica_sanitaria.pdf Consultado Agosto de 2011.
Hemsworth PH, Rice M, Karlen MG, Calleja L, Barnett JL, Nash J, et al. Human-animal interactions at abattoirs: Relationships between handling and animal stress in sheep and cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011; 135:24-33.
Romero MH, Sánchez JA, Gutiérrez, C. Evaluación de prácticas de bienestar animal durante el transporte de bovinos para sacrificio. Rev. salud pública 2011b; 13(4):684-690.
Miranda-de la Lama GC, Leyva IG, Barreras-Serrano A, Pérez-Linares C, Sánchez-López E, María G.A, et al. Assessment of cattle welfare at a commercial slaughter plant in the northwest of Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod 2012; 44(3):497-504.
Hemsworth PH, Rice M, Karlen MG, Calleja L, Barnett, JL. Science and its application in assessing the welfare of laying hens. Aust. Vet. J. 2003; 81:615-624.
Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, van der Werf JTN, Schilder MBH, Knaap JH, Barneveld A, et al. Heart rate and heart rate variability during a novel object test and handling test in young horses. Physiol Behav 2002; 76:289-296.
Waiblinger S, Menke C, Folsch DW. Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy cows towards humans on 35 farms. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003; 84:23-39.
Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedesen V, Tosi MV, Janczak A, Visser K, et al. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2006; 101(1):85-242.
Hemsworth PH, Coleman G, Barnett JL, Borg S. Relationships between human–animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 2000; 8:2821-2831.
Breuer K, Hemsworth P, Coleman GJ. The effect of positive or negative handling on the behavioural and physiological responses of non lactating heifers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003; 84:3-22.
Boivin X, Tournadre H, Le Neindre P. Hand-feeding and gentling influence early-weaned lambs’ attachment responses to their stockperson. J. Anim. Sci. 2000; 78:879-884.
Waiblinger S, Menke C, Korff J, Bucher A. Previous handling and gentle interactions affect behavior and heart rate of dairy cows during a veterinary procedure. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004; 85:31-42.
Romero M, Sánchez J. Bienestar animal durante el transporte y su relación con la calidad de la carne bovina. Rev. MVZ Córdoba 2012; 17(1):2936-2944.
Coleman G, McGregor M, Hemsworth PH, Boyce J, Dowling S. The relationship between beliefs, attitudes and observed behaviours of abattoir personnel in the pig industry. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003; 82:189-200.
Seabrook MF. The effect of the operational environment and operating protocols on the attitudes and behaviour of employees stockpersons. Human–animal relationship: stockmanship and housing in organic livestock systems. In: Hovi M, Bouilhol M, editors. Proceedings of the Third NAHWOA Workshop, University of Reading, Clermont-Ferrand, 21-24 October 2000. p. 23-32.
Romero MH, Sánchez J. Bienestar animal durante el transporte y su relación con la calidad de la carne bovina. Animal welfare during transport and its relationship with meat quality. Rev MVZ Córd. 2012; 17(1):2936-2944.
Romero MH, Sánchez JA, Gutiérrez C. Evaluación de prácticas de bienestar animal durante el transporte de bovinos para sacrificio. Rev. Salud Pública 2011; 13(4):684-690.
Romero MH, Uribe LF, Sánchez JA. Biomarcadores de estrés como indicadores de bienestar animal en ganado de carne. Biosalud 2011; 10(1):71-87.
Kaltas, GA, Chrousos GP. 2007. The neuroendorinology of stress. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG, editors. Handbook of Psychophysiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 303-318.
Amtmann VA, Gallo C, van Schaik G, Tadich N. Relaciones entre el manejo ante-mortem, variables sanguíneas indicadoras de estrés y pH de la canal en novillos. Arch Med Vet 2006; 38(3):259-264.
Romero MH, Paranhos da Costa MJR, Sánchez JA. Bienestar animal: un compromiso de la cadena cárnica bovina. Biosalud 2011; 10(2):71-86.
Strappini AC, Frankena K, Metz, JHM, Gallo C, Kemp B. Characteristics of bruises in carcasses of cows sourced from farms or from livestock markets. Animal journal 2012; 6(3):502-509.
Strappini AC, Frankena K, Metz JHM, Gallo B, Kemp B. Prevalence and risk factors for bruises in Chilean bovine carcasses. Meat Sci 2010; 86:859-864.
Nanni Costa L, Lo Fiego DP, Tassone F, Russo V. The relationship between carcass bruising in bulls and behaviour observed during pre-slaughter phases. Veterinary Research Communications 200; 30:379-381.
Romero MH, Gutiérrez C, Sánchez J. Evaluation of bruises as an animal welfare indicator during preslaughter of beef cattle. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2012; 25:267-275.
Gallo, C. Using scientific evidence to inform public policy on the long distance transportation of animals in South America. Veterinaria Italiana 2008; 44(1):113-120.
Gallo C, Lizondo G, Knowles G. Effects of journey and lairage time on steers transported to slaughter in Chile. Vet Rec 2003; 152:361-364.
Leyva-García IA, Figueroa-Saavedra F, Sánchez-López E, Pérez-Linares C, Barreras-Serrano A. Impacto económico de la presencia de carne DFD en una planta de sacrificio Tipo Inspección Federal (TIF). Arch Med Vet 2012; 44:39-42.
Lensink J, Fernández X, Cozzi G, Florand L, Veissier I. The influence of farmers’ behavior on calves’ reactions to transport and quality of veal meat. J. Anim. Sci. 2001; 79:642-652.
Paranhos da Costa MJR. Ambiência na produção de bovinos de corte a pasto. Anais de Etologia 2000; 18:26-42.
Miranda-de la Lama GC, Mattiello S. The importance of social behaviour for goat welfare in livestock farming. Small Rumin Res 2009; 90:1-10.
Maria GA, Villarroel M, Chacon G, Gebresenet G. Scoring system for evaluating the stress to cattle of commercial loading and unloading. Vet Rec 2004; 154:818-821.
Bourguet C, Deiss V, Boissy A, Andanson S, Terlouw EMC. Effects of feed deprivation on behavioral reactivity and physiological status in Holstein cattle. J of Anim Sci 2011; 88:3272-3285.
Grandin T. Recommended Animal Handling Guidelines & Audit Guide: A Systematic Approach to Animal Welfare. AMI Foundation. Agosto de 2012. 121 p.
Dohoo I, Wayne M, Henrik S. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. 2a edition; 2009.
Szklo M, Nieto J. Epidemiología intermedia, conceptos y aplicaciones. Madrid: Díaz de Santos; 2003. p. 103-130.
Hemsworth PH. Human–animal interactions in livestock production. Appl. Anim. Beh. Sci. 2003; 81:185-198.
Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, Hopster H, Schilder MB, Knaap JH, Barneveld A, et al. Quantifying aspects of young horses’ temperament: consistency of behavioural variables. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001; 74:241-258.
Krohn C, Jago JG, Boivin X. The effect of early handling on the socialisation of young calves to humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001; 74:121-133.
Romero MH, Uribe LF, Sánchez JA. El transporte terrestre de bovinos y sus implicaciones en el bienestar animal: Revisión. Biosalud 2010; 9(2):67-82.
Boivin X, Garel JP, Durier C, Le Neindre P. Is gentling by people rewarding for beef calves? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998; 61:1-12.
Lensink J, Fernández X, Boivin X, Pradel P, LeNeindre P, Veissier I. The impact of gentle contacts on ease of handling, welfare, and growth of calves and on quality of veal meat. J Anim Sci 2000; 78:1219-1226.
Krohn C, Boivin X, Jago JG. The presence of the dam during handling prevents the socialization of young calves to humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003; 80:263-265.
Lensink J, Boivin X, Pradel P, LeNeindre, P Veissier I. Reducing veal calves’ reactivity to people by providing additional human contact. J. Anim. Sci. 2000; 78:1213-1218.
Lensink J, Raussi S, Boivin X, Pyykkonen M, Veissier I. Reactions of calves to handling depend on housing conditions and previous experience with humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001; 70:187-199.
Lensink J, Fernández X, Cozzi G, Florand L, Veissier I. The influence of farmers’ behavior on calves’ reactions to transport and quality of veal meat. J. Anim. Sci. 2001; 79:642-652.
Munksgaard L, De Passille´ AM, Rushen J, Herskin MS, Kristensen AM. Dairy cows’ fear of people: social learning, milk yield and behaviour at milking. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001; 73:15-26.
Ministerio de la Protección Social. Decreto 1500, mayo 4 de 2007.
Ministerio de la Protección Social. Resolución 2905, agosto 22 de 2007.
Gavinelli A, Ferrara M, Simonin D. Formulating policies for the welfare of animals during long distance transportation. Vet Ital 2008; 44(1):71-86.
Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Haley DB, Church S, Woods J, O´byrne T. An education and training programme for livestock transporters in Canada. Vet Ital 2008; 44(1):273-283.
Edge MK, Barnett JL. Development of animal welfare standards for the livestock transport industry: process, challenges, and implementation. J Vet Behav 2009; 4:187-192.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2022-03-17
date_accessioned 2022-03-17T00:36:43Z
date_available 2022-03-17T00:36:43Z
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/biosalud/article/view/4718
url_doi https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/biosalud/article/view/4718
issn 1657-9550
eissn 2462-960X
citationstartpage 79
citationendpage 91
url2_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/biosalud/article/download/4718/4306
_version_ 1811199444274642944

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares