Titulo:

Nothing Special? (Activist) Design Skills for the 21st Century
.

Guardado en:

1794-7111

2462-8115

9

2011-01-01

101

119

Revista Kepes - 2015

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article_465
record_format ojs
spelling Nothing Special? (Activist) Design Skills for the 21st Century
Nothing Special? (Activist) Design Skills for the 21st Century
Abstract This isn’t just a challenge for designers, but also for policy, design research and the representation of design through its exhibition or publication. Design is embracing new sets of skills that require extended thinking. In terms of design education, which plays a role in defining the skills necessary to designers, this dynamic is particularly challenging. In this article, rather than pursue traditional disciplinary fields – either to be found in the design profession or in its educational institutions – I move toward four conceptual frameworks that might help structure a way into considering where design skills for the 21st century might be directed. I do this in the context of increasing global resource constraints, the need to address climate change more thoughtfully and issues of social inequality and injustice that have become greater and more widespread over the past 30 years. These years have seen the growth of design in the context of the neoliberal economic and social system. Building away from this, we may see design as an active agent in forging post-neoliberal ways of living, acting and being. 
Julier, Guy .
challenge
con- text
design education
design research
challenge
context
design education
design research
9
8
Núm. 8 , Año 2012 : Enero - Diciembre 2012
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
2011-01-01
application/pdf
Universidad de Caldas
Kepes
1794-7111
2462-8115
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/465
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/465
eng
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Revista Kepes - 2015
101
119
References Bourdieu, Pierre. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Christensen, Poul Rind, Anne Flemmert Jensen & MetteMikkelsen. (2010). Lost in Translation?: Between User Driven and Design Driven Innovation. Paper presented at Cumulus Conference, Shanghai.
Design Industry Voices. (2011). Design Industry Voices 2011: How it feels to work in British digital and design agencies right now. report available at www. designindustryvoices.com (last accessed 27 August 2012).
Dorland, Anne Marie. (2009). Routinized Labour in the Design Studio. In: G. Julier & L. Moor (eds.), Design and Creativity: Policy, Management and Practice. Oxford: Berg.
Escobar, Arturo. (2010). Latin America at a Crossroads: Alternative modernizations, post-liberalism, or post-development? Cultural Studies, 24(1), 1-65.
Fallan, Kjetil. (2008). De-scribing Design: Appropriating Script Analysis to Design History. Design Issues, 24(4), 61-75.
Horn, Maxine J. et al. (2006). The British Design Industry Valuation Survey, 2005 to 2006. (Report). Brighton: British Design Innovation.
Julier, Guy. (2008). The Culture of Design. 2nd Edition. London: Sage.
Kennedy, Marie & Tilly, Chris. (2008). Making sense of Latin America’s “third left”. New Politics, 11(4), 11-16.
Klein, Naomi. (2007). The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Knopf:Canada.
Lash, Scott. (2010). Intensive Culture: Social Theory, Religion and Contemporary Capitalism. London: Sage.
Lury, Celia. (2004). Brands: The Logos of the Global Economy. Abingdon: Routledge.
Manzini, Ezio. (1998). Products in a Period of Transition: Products, Services and Interactions for a Sustainable Society. In: Tevfik Balcioglu (ed.), The Role of Product Design in Post-Industrial Society (pp. 43-58). Ankara: Middle East Technical University
Markussen, Thomas. (2011). The Disruptive Aesthetics of Design Activism: Enacting design between art and politics. Paper given at NORDES 2011: Making Design Matter conference, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland. Available online at http:// ocs.sfu.ca/nordes.
Marres, Noortje. (2011). The costs of public involvement: everyday devices of carbon accounting and the materialization of participation. Economy and Society, 40(4), 510-533.
Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Jørgen Randers & William W. Behrens III. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.
Mollison, Bill & Holmgren, David (1978) Permaculture One: A Perennial Agriculture for Human Settlements. Ealing: Trasworld Publishers.
Myers, Simon. (2007). Just have the balls to say ‘no’. DesignWeek. 04/10/07.
Papanek, Victor. (1972). Design for the Real World. London: Thames & Hudson.
Rittel, Horst & Webber, Melvin. (1973). Dilemmas in General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
Schumacher, E.F. (1973). Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London: Blond & Briggs.
Scothron, David. (2007). Product designer, Product First. Intervention at ‘Counting Creativity: the Organisation and Valorisation of Design Practices’, workshop, Design Council, London, Wednesday 17 January, 2007.
Solnit, Rebecca. (2007). Storming the Gates of Paradise: Landscapes for Politics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Smith, Marquard. (2005). Visual Studies, or the ossification of thought. Journal of Visual Culture, 4(2), 237-56.
Times of India. (2012). Standard & Poor’s cuts GDP growth forecast to 5.5%. 25 September 2012.
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/465/390
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Kepes
title Nothing Special? (Activist) Design Skills for the 21st Century
spellingShingle Nothing Special? (Activist) Design Skills for the 21st Century
Julier, Guy .
challenge
con- text
design education
design research
challenge
context
design education
design research
title_short Nothing Special? (Activist) Design Skills for the 21st Century
title_full Nothing Special? (Activist) Design Skills for the 21st Century
title_fullStr Nothing Special? (Activist) Design Skills for the 21st Century
title_full_unstemmed Nothing Special? (Activist) Design Skills for the 21st Century
title_sort nothing special? (activist) design skills for the 21st century
title_eng Nothing Special? (Activist) Design Skills for the 21st Century
description_eng Abstract This isn’t just a challenge for designers, but also for policy, design research and the representation of design through its exhibition or publication. Design is embracing new sets of skills that require extended thinking. In terms of design education, which plays a role in defining the skills necessary to designers, this dynamic is particularly challenging. In this article, rather than pursue traditional disciplinary fields – either to be found in the design profession or in its educational institutions – I move toward four conceptual frameworks that might help structure a way into considering where design skills for the 21st century might be directed. I do this in the context of increasing global resource constraints, the need to address climate change more thoughtfully and issues of social inequality and injustice that have become greater and more widespread over the past 30 years. These years have seen the growth of design in the context of the neoliberal economic and social system. Building away from this, we may see design as an active agent in forging post-neoliberal ways of living, acting and being. 
author Julier, Guy .
author_facet Julier, Guy .
topicspa_str_mv challenge
con- text
design education
design research
topic challenge
con- text
design education
design research
challenge
context
design education
design research
topic_facet challenge
con- text
design education
design research
challenge
context
design education
design research
citationvolume 9
citationissue 8
citationedition Núm. 8 , Año 2012 : Enero - Diciembre 2012
publisher Universidad de Caldas
ispartofjournal Kepes
source https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/465
language eng
format Article
rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Revista Kepes - 2015
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references_eng References Bourdieu, Pierre. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Christensen, Poul Rind, Anne Flemmert Jensen & MetteMikkelsen. (2010). Lost in Translation?: Between User Driven and Design Driven Innovation. Paper presented at Cumulus Conference, Shanghai.
Design Industry Voices. (2011). Design Industry Voices 2011: How it feels to work in British digital and design agencies right now. report available at www. designindustryvoices.com (last accessed 27 August 2012).
Dorland, Anne Marie. (2009). Routinized Labour in the Design Studio. In: G. Julier & L. Moor (eds.), Design and Creativity: Policy, Management and Practice. Oxford: Berg.
Escobar, Arturo. (2010). Latin America at a Crossroads: Alternative modernizations, post-liberalism, or post-development? Cultural Studies, 24(1), 1-65.
Fallan, Kjetil. (2008). De-scribing Design: Appropriating Script Analysis to Design History. Design Issues, 24(4), 61-75.
Horn, Maxine J. et al. (2006). The British Design Industry Valuation Survey, 2005 to 2006. (Report). Brighton: British Design Innovation.
Julier, Guy. (2008). The Culture of Design. 2nd Edition. London: Sage.
Kennedy, Marie & Tilly, Chris. (2008). Making sense of Latin America’s “third left”. New Politics, 11(4), 11-16.
Klein, Naomi. (2007). The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Knopf:Canada.
Lash, Scott. (2010). Intensive Culture: Social Theory, Religion and Contemporary Capitalism. London: Sage.
Lury, Celia. (2004). Brands: The Logos of the Global Economy. Abingdon: Routledge.
Manzini, Ezio. (1998). Products in a Period of Transition: Products, Services and Interactions for a Sustainable Society. In: Tevfik Balcioglu (ed.), The Role of Product Design in Post-Industrial Society (pp. 43-58). Ankara: Middle East Technical University
Markussen, Thomas. (2011). The Disruptive Aesthetics of Design Activism: Enacting design between art and politics. Paper given at NORDES 2011: Making Design Matter conference, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland. Available online at http:// ocs.sfu.ca/nordes.
Marres, Noortje. (2011). The costs of public involvement: everyday devices of carbon accounting and the materialization of participation. Economy and Society, 40(4), 510-533.
Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Jørgen Randers & William W. Behrens III. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.
Mollison, Bill & Holmgren, David (1978) Permaculture One: A Perennial Agriculture for Human Settlements. Ealing: Trasworld Publishers.
Myers, Simon. (2007). Just have the balls to say ‘no’. DesignWeek. 04/10/07.
Papanek, Victor. (1972). Design for the Real World. London: Thames & Hudson.
Rittel, Horst & Webber, Melvin. (1973). Dilemmas in General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
Schumacher, E.F. (1973). Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London: Blond & Briggs.
Scothron, David. (2007). Product designer, Product First. Intervention at ‘Counting Creativity: the Organisation and Valorisation of Design Practices’, workshop, Design Council, London, Wednesday 17 January, 2007.
Solnit, Rebecca. (2007). Storming the Gates of Paradise: Landscapes for Politics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Smith, Marquard. (2005). Visual Studies, or the ossification of thought. Journal of Visual Culture, 4(2), 237-56.
Times of India. (2012). Standard & Poor’s cuts GDP growth forecast to 5.5%. 25 September 2012.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2011-01-01
date_accessioned 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/465
url_doi https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/465
issn 1794-7111
eissn 2462-8115
citationstartpage 101
citationendpage 119
url2_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/465/390
_version_ 1811199579445526528