¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)

Cruz Bernate, Lorena

doi:10.17151/bccm.2021.25.1.5

Titulo:

¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
.

Sumario:

Se investigó la relación entre la preferencia de selección de sitios de anidamiento, la posición jerárquica y el éxito reproductivo del Periquito de anteojos (Forpus conspicillatus) en la Universidad del Valle y en la Reserva Natural Pozo Verde, en el Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Los sitios de anidamiento se instalaron según las variables: altura sobre el suelo (1 m y 4 m) y distancia al árbol más próximo (0 m, 15 m y 50 m). Las parejas de adultos prefirieron las cajas nido ubicadas a 4 m de altura sobre el suelo. La posición jerárquica de las parejas no se correlacionó significativamente con la prioridad de elección de las cajas nido, pero sí con la escogencia de cajas en los sitios preferidos. Las parejas dominantes produjeron un mayor núme... Ver más

Guardado en:

Revista:

Boletín Científico Centro de Museos Museo de Historia Natural

ISSN:

0123-3068

EISSN:

2462-8190

Autores:

Cruz Bernate, Lorena

Editor:

UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS

DOI:

10.17151/bccm.2021.25.1.5

Volumen:

Año de publicación:

2020-01-01

Pagina inicial:

Pagina final:

Pais:

Palabras claves:

Forpus conspicillatus

Colombia

Licencia:

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id	oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article_4335
record_format	ojs
spelling	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae) Does being dominant bring advantages? Hierarchical position, nesting sites and reproductive success of Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae) Se investigó la relación entre la preferencia de selección de sitios de anidamiento, la posición jerárquica y el éxito reproductivo del Periquito de anteojos (Forpus conspicillatus) en la Universidad del Valle y en la Reserva Natural Pozo Verde, en el Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Los sitios de anidamiento se instalaron según las variables: altura sobre el suelo (1 m y 4 m) y distancia al árbol más próximo (0 m, 15 m y 50 m). Las parejas de adultos prefirieron las cajas nido ubicadas a 4 m de altura sobre el suelo. La posición jerárquica de las parejas no se correlacionó significativamente con la prioridad de elección de las cajas nido, pero sí con la escogencia de cajas en los sitios preferidos. Las parejas dominantes produjeron un mayor número de huevos que las subordinadas, pero no hubo correlación entre posición jerárquica y número de polluelos que alcanzaron el éxodo. Tampoco se encontró correlación entre productividad anual, medida como el número de polluelos que llegaron al éxodo y la ubicación de las cajas nido. La ausencia de correlación pudo deberse a que la depredación, la principal causa de mortalidad de polluelos, tuvo igual incidencia en todas las situaciones. El infanticidio por Troglodytes aëdon fue responsable del 30.30% de los fracasos de los nidos de F. conspicillatus, pero los daños por T. aëdon no fueron más frecuentes en los sitios preferidos por F. conspicillatus.&nbsp; The relationship between the preference of selection of nesting sites, the hierarchical position and the reproductive success of Spectacled parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus) were researched in Universidad del Valle and Pozo Verde Natural Reserve in Valle del Cauca, Colombia. The nesting sites were installed according to the variables height above the ground (1m and 4m) and distance to nearest tree (0m, 15m and50 m). The adult pairs preferred the nest boxes located 4 m above the ground. The hierarchical position of the pairs was not significantly correlated with the priority of choosing the nest boxes but with the selection of boxes in the preferred sites. The dominant pairs produced a greater number of eggs than the subordinate ones, but there was no correlation between hierarchical position and number of chicks that reached the exodus. Nor there was correlation between annual productivity, measured as the number of chicks that reached the exodus and the location of the nest boxes. The absence of correlation could be due to the fact that predation, the main cause of mortality of chicks, had the same incidence in all situations. Infanticide by Troglodytes aedon was responsible for 30.30% of the nest failures of F. conspicillatus but damage by T. aedon was not more frequent at sites preferred by F. conspicillatus.&nbsp; Cruz Bernate, Lorena dominancia reproducción cajas nido periquito Forpus conspicillatus Colombia dominance reproduction nest boxes parakeet Forpus conspicillatus Colombia 25 1 Núm. 1 , Año 2021 : Enero - Junio Artículo de revista Journal article 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z 2020-01-01 application/pdf Boletín Científico Boletín Científico Centro de Museos Museo de Historia Natural 0123-3068 2462-8190 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/view/4335 10.17151/bccm.2021.25.1.5 https://doi.org/10.17151/bccm.2021.25.1.5 spa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ 71 86 Agresti, A. (2015). Foundations of Linear and Generalized Linear Models. New York: Willey. Albano, D. J. (1992). Nesting mortality of Carolina Chickadees breeding in natural cavities. Condor 94, 371-382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369210 Alcock, J. (1989). Animal Behaviour. (4 ed.). Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc. Alonso, J. C., Bautista, L. M. y Alonso, J. A. (1997). Dominance and the dynamics of phenotype limited distribution in common cranes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 401-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050356 Beissinger, S. R. y Waltman, J. R. (1991). Extraordinary clutch size and hatching asynchrony of a Neotropical Parrot. Auk, 108, 863-871. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/108.4.863 Belles-Isles, J. C. y Picman, J. (1986a). Nesting losses and nest site preferences in House Wrens. Condor, 88, 483-486. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368275 Belles-Isles, J. C. y Picman, J. (1986b). House Wren nest-destroying behavior. Condor, 88, 190-193. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368914 Best, L. B. y Stauffer, D. F. (1980). Factors affecting success in riparian bird communities. Condor, 82, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367468 Brawn, J. D. (1988). Selectivity and ecological consequences of cavity nesters using natural vs. artificial nest sites. Auk, 105, 789-791. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4087398 Brawn, J. D. y Balda, R. P. (1988). Population biology of cavity nesters in Northern Arizona: do nest sites limit breeding densities? Condor, 90, 61-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368434 Brightsmith, D. J. (2005). Parrot nesting in southwastern Peru: seasonal patterns and keystone trees. Wilson Bulletin, 117, 296-305. https://doi.org/10.1676/03-087A.1 Davies, N. B., Krebs, J. R. y West, S. A. (2012). An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. (4 ed). Oxford: Willey Blackwell. Dobkin, D. S., Rich, A. C., Pretare, J. A. y Pyle, W. H. (1995). Nest site relationships among birds of riparian and snowpocket aspen woodlands in the northwestern Great Basin. Condor, 97, 694–707. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369178 Espinal, L. S. (1967). Apuntes sobre Ecología Colombiana. Cali: Universidad del Valle. Finch, D. M. (1989). Relationships of surrounding riparian habitat to nest-box use and reproductive outcome in House wrens. Condor, 91, 848-859. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368069 Freed, L. A. (1986). Usurpatory and opportunistic bigamy in tropical House Wrens. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1894-1896. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80277-9 Garnetzke-Stollmann, K. y Franck, D. (1988). Long-lasting sibling relationships as a mean to acquire reproductive ability in the Spectacled Parrotlet (Forpus conspicillatus). en R. van den Elzen, K-L. Schuchmann y K. Schmidt-Koenig (eds). Current topics in avian biology (pp. 293-298). Stuugart: Deutsche ornithologen-Gesellschaft. Garnetzke-Stollmann, K. y Franck, D. (1991). Socialisation tactics of the spectacled parrotlet (Forpus conspicillatus). Behaviour, 119, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853991X00346 Gill, F. B. (2007). Ornithology. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co. Gómez, N. (1991). Historia Natural de Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae) en el Valle del Cauca (Tesis de pregrado). Universidad del Valle, Cali. Colombia. Hahn, S. y Bauer, S. (2008). Dominance in feeding territories relates to foraging success and offpring grown skuas Catharacta antárctica lonnbergi. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 1149-1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0543-7 Hardy, J. W. (1965). Flock social behavior of the Orange-fronted Parakeet. Condor, 67, 140-156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1365258 Joy, J. B. (2000). Characteristics of nest cavities and nest trees of the Red-breasted Sapsucker in coastal montane forests. Journal of Field Ornithology, 71, 525–530. https://doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-71.3.525 Kattán, G. H. y Gómez, N. (1992). Body temperature of Spectacled Parrotlet nestlings in relation to body mass and brood size. Condor, 94, 280-282. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1368818 Krause, J. y Ruxton, G. D. (2002). Living in groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lanning, D. V. y Shiflett, J. T. (1983). Nesting ecology of Thick-billed Parrots. Condor, 85, 66-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367891 Levinson, S. T. (1980). The social behavior of the White-fronted Amazon (Amazona albifrons). Conservation of New World Parrots. En R. F. Pasquier (ed.). Proceedings of the JCBP Parrot Working Group Meeting (pp. 403-417). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. Li, P. y Martin, T. E. (1991). Nest-site selection and nesting success of cavity-nesting birds in high elevation forest drainages. Auk, 108, 405-418. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/108.2.405 Lindsey, G. D. (1992). Nest guarding from observation blinds: strategy for improving Puerto Rican Parrot nest success. Journal Field Ornithology, 63, 466-472. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4513745 Marsden, S. J. y Jones, M. J. (1997). The nesting requirements of the parrots and hornbill of suma, Indonesia. Biological Conservation, 82, 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00038-4 Martin, T. E. y Roper, J. L. (1988). Nest predation and nest-site selection of a western population of the Hermit Thrush. Condor, 90, 51-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368432 Martin, T. E. y Roper, J. L. (1992). Interaction of nest predation and food limitation in reproductive strategies. Current Ornithology, 9, 163-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9921-7_5 Martin, T. E., Roper, J. L. y Li, P. (1992). Life history traits of open vs. cavity-nesting birds. Ecology, 73, 579-592. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940764 Moller, A. P. (1989). Parasites, predators and nest boxes: facts and artefacts in nest box studies of birds? Oikos, 56, 421-423. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3565628 Nilsson, S. G. (1984). The evolution of nest site selection among hole-nesting birds: the importance of nest predation and competition. Ornis Scandinavica, 15, 165–175. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3675958 Nilsson, S. G. (1986). Evolution of hole-nesting in birds: on balancing selection pressures. Auk, 103, 432-435. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4087101 Peterson, B. y Gauthier, G. (1985). Nest site use by cavity-nesting birds of the Caribou Parkland, British Columbia. Wilson Bulletin, 97, 319-331. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4162105 Poisbleau, M., Guillenain, M., Demongin, L. y Carslake, D. (2009). Within-brood social status and consequences for Winter hierarchies amongst mallard Anas platyrhynchos ducklings. Journal of Ornithology, 150, 195-204. DOI 10.1007/s10336-008-0334-6 Power, D. M. (1966). Agonistic behavior and vocalizations of Orange-chinned Parakeets in captivity. Condor, 68, 562-581. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1366264 Pribil, S. y Picman, J. (1991). Why House Wrens destroy clutches of other birds: a support for the nest site competition hypothesis. Condor, 93, 184-185. https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/condor/.../p0184-p0185.pdf Pulliam, H. R. y Caraco, T. (1984). Living in groups: Is there an optimal group size? En J. R. Krebs y N. B. Davies (eds.). Behavioral ecology. (2 ed.) (pp. 122-147). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. Rendell, W. B. y Robertson, R. J. (1989). Nest-site characteristics, reproductive success and cavity availability for Tree Swallows breeding in natural cavities. Condor, 91, 875-885. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1368072 Renton, K. (2004). Agonistic interactions of nesting and nonbreeding macaws. Condor, 106, 354-362. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/106.2.354 Rodríguez-Castillo, A. M. y Eberhard, J. R. (2006). Reproductive behavior of the productive behavior of the Yellow-crowned Parrot (Amazona ochrocephala) in western Panama. Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 118, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1676/05-003.1 Rogers, L. J. y McCulloch, H. (1981). Pair-bonding in the Galah Cacatua roseicapilla. Bird Behaviour, 3, 80-92. https://doi.org/10.3727/015613881791560694 Sánchez–Martínez, T. C. y Renton, K. (2009). Availibility and selection of arboreal termitaria as nest-sites by Orange-fronted Parakeets Aratinga canicularis in conserved and modified landscapes in Mexico. Ibis, 151 (2), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.00911.x Skeate, S. T. (1984). Courtship and reproductive behaviour of captive White-fronted Amazon Parrots Amazona albifrons. Bird Behaviour, 5, 103-109. Snyder, N. F. R., Wiley, J. W. y Kepler, C. B. (1987). The Parrots of Luquillo: Natural History and Conservation of the Puerto Rican Parrot. Los Angeles: Western Foundation of Vertebrate Zoology. Stauffer, D. E. y Best, L. B. (1982). Nest site selection by cavity-nesting of riparian habitats in Iowa. Wilson Bulletin, 94, 329-337. http://www.jstor.com/stable/4161643 Strahl, S. D., Desenne, P. A., Jimenez, J. L. y Goldstein, I. R. (1991). Behavior and biology of the Hawk-Headed Parrot, Deroptyus accipitrinus, in Southern Venezuela. Condor, 93, 177-180. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1368622 Waltman, J. R. y Beissinger, S. T. (1992). Breeding behavior of the Green-Rumped Parrotlet. Wilson Bulletin, 104, 65-84. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4163117 Wanker, R. (1990). Beiträge zur Ökologie und Sperlingspapageis (Forpus conspicillatus) Diplomarbeit (Tesis de grado). Universität Hamburg. Wanker, R. (1999). Socialization in Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): how juveniles compensate for the lack of siblings. Acta Ethological, 2, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012228 Wanker, R. y Fischer, J. (2001). Intra-and interindividual variation in the contact calls of Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus). Behaviour, 138, 709-726. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853901752233361 Wanker, R., Apcin, J., Jennerjahn, B. y Waibel, B. (1998). Discrimination of different socialcompanions in Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): evidence for individual vocal recognition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 43, 197-202. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4601505 Wanker, R., Cruz Bernate, L. y Franck, D. (1996). Socialization of Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): The role of parents, creches and sibling groups in nature. Journal für Ornithologie, 137, 447-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01661101 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/download/4335/3985 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication
institution	UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS
thumbnail	https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png
country_str	Colombia
collection	Boletín Científico Centro de Museos Museo de Historia Natural
title	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
spellingShingle	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae) Cruz Bernate, Lorena dominancia reproducción cajas nido periquito Forpus conspicillatus Colombia dominance reproduction nest boxes parakeet Forpus conspicillatus Colombia
title_short	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
title_full	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
title_fullStr	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
title_full_unstemmed	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
title_sort	¿ser dominante trae ventajas? posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en forpus conspicillatus (aves: psittacidae)
title_eng	Does being dominant bring advantages? Hierarchical position, nesting sites and reproductive success of Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
description	Se investigó la relación entre la preferencia de selección de sitios de anidamiento, la posición jerárquica y el éxito reproductivo del Periquito de anteojos (Forpus conspicillatus) en la Universidad del Valle y en la Reserva Natural Pozo Verde, en el Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Los sitios de anidamiento se instalaron según las variables: altura sobre el suelo (1 m y 4 m) y distancia al árbol más próximo (0 m, 15 m y 50 m). Las parejas de adultos prefirieron las cajas nido ubicadas a 4 m de altura sobre el suelo. La posición jerárquica de las parejas no se correlacionó significativamente con la prioridad de elección de las cajas nido, pero sí con la escogencia de cajas en los sitios preferidos. Las parejas dominantes produjeron un mayor número de huevos que las subordinadas, pero no hubo correlación entre posición jerárquica y número de polluelos que alcanzaron el éxodo. Tampoco se encontró correlación entre productividad anual, medida como el número de polluelos que llegaron al éxodo y la ubicación de las cajas nido. La ausencia de correlación pudo deberse a que la depredación, la principal causa de mortalidad de polluelos, tuvo igual incidencia en todas las situaciones. El infanticidio por Troglodytes aëdon fue responsable del 30.30% de los fracasos de los nidos de F. conspicillatus, pero los daños por T. aëdon no fueron más frecuentes en los sitios preferidos por F. conspicillatus.&nbsp;
description_eng	The relationship between the preference of selection of nesting sites, the hierarchical position and the reproductive success of Spectacled parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus) were researched in Universidad del Valle and Pozo Verde Natural Reserve in Valle del Cauca, Colombia. The nesting sites were installed according to the variables height above the ground (1m and 4m) and distance to nearest tree (0m, 15m and50 m). The adult pairs preferred the nest boxes located 4 m above the ground. The hierarchical position of the pairs was not significantly correlated with the priority of choosing the nest boxes but with the selection of boxes in the preferred sites. The dominant pairs produced a greater number of eggs than the subordinate ones, but there was no correlation between hierarchical position and number of chicks that reached the exodus. Nor there was correlation between annual productivity, measured as the number of chicks that reached the exodus and the location of the nest boxes. The absence of correlation could be due to the fact that predation, the main cause of mortality of chicks, had the same incidence in all situations. Infanticide by Troglodytes aedon was responsible for 30.30% of the nest failures of F. conspicillatus but damage by T. aedon was not more frequent at sites preferred by F. conspicillatus.&nbsp;
author	Cruz Bernate, Lorena
author_facet	Cruz Bernate, Lorena
topicspa_str_mv	dominancia reproducción cajas nido periquito Forpus conspicillatus Colombia
topic	dominancia reproducción cajas nido periquito Forpus conspicillatus Colombia dominance reproduction nest boxes parakeet Forpus conspicillatus Colombia
topic_facet	dominancia reproducción cajas nido periquito Forpus conspicillatus Colombia dominance reproduction nest boxes parakeet Forpus conspicillatus Colombia
citationvolume	25
citationissue	1
citationedition	Núm. 1 , Año 2021 : Enero - Junio
publisher	Boletín Científico
ispartofjournal	Boletín Científico Centro de Museos Museo de Historia Natural
source	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/view/4335
language	spa
format	Article
rights	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references	Agresti, A. (2015). Foundations of Linear and Generalized Linear Models. New York: Willey. Albano, D. J. (1992). Nesting mortality of Carolina Chickadees breeding in natural cavities. Condor 94, 371-382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369210 Alcock, J. (1989). Animal Behaviour. (4 ed.). Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc. Alonso, J. C., Bautista, L. M. y Alonso, J. A. (1997). Dominance and the dynamics of phenotype limited distribution in common cranes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 401-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050356 Beissinger, S. R. y Waltman, J. R. (1991). Extraordinary clutch size and hatching asynchrony of a Neotropical Parrot. Auk, 108, 863-871. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/108.4.863 Belles-Isles, J. C. y Picman, J. (1986a). Nesting losses and nest site preferences in House Wrens. Condor, 88, 483-486. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368275 Belles-Isles, J. C. y Picman, J. (1986b). House Wren nest-destroying behavior. Condor, 88, 190-193. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368914 Best, L. B. y Stauffer, D. F. (1980). Factors affecting success in riparian bird communities. Condor, 82, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367468 Brawn, J. D. (1988). Selectivity and ecological consequences of cavity nesters using natural vs. artificial nest sites. Auk, 105, 789-791. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4087398 Brawn, J. D. y Balda, R. P. (1988). Population biology of cavity nesters in Northern Arizona: do nest sites limit breeding densities? Condor, 90, 61-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368434 Brightsmith, D. J. (2005). Parrot nesting in southwastern Peru: seasonal patterns and keystone trees. Wilson Bulletin, 117, 296-305. https://doi.org/10.1676/03-087A.1 Davies, N. B., Krebs, J. R. y West, S. A. (2012). An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. (4 ed). Oxford: Willey Blackwell. Dobkin, D. S., Rich, A. C., Pretare, J. A. y Pyle, W. H. (1995). Nest site relationships among birds of riparian and snowpocket aspen woodlands in the northwestern Great Basin. Condor, 97, 694–707. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369178 Espinal, L. S. (1967). Apuntes sobre Ecología Colombiana. Cali: Universidad del Valle. Finch, D. M. (1989). Relationships of surrounding riparian habitat to nest-box use and reproductive outcome in House wrens. Condor, 91, 848-859. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368069 Freed, L. A. (1986). Usurpatory and opportunistic bigamy in tropical House Wrens. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1894-1896. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80277-9 Garnetzke-Stollmann, K. y Franck, D. (1988). Long-lasting sibling relationships as a mean to acquire reproductive ability in the Spectacled Parrotlet (Forpus conspicillatus). en R. van den Elzen, K-L. Schuchmann y K. Schmidt-Koenig (eds). Current topics in avian biology (pp. 293-298). Stuugart: Deutsche ornithologen-Gesellschaft. Garnetzke-Stollmann, K. y Franck, D. (1991). Socialisation tactics of the spectacled parrotlet (Forpus conspicillatus). Behaviour, 119, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853991X00346 Gill, F. B. (2007). Ornithology. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co. Gómez, N. (1991). Historia Natural de Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae) en el Valle del Cauca (Tesis de pregrado). Universidad del Valle, Cali. Colombia. Hahn, S. y Bauer, S. (2008). Dominance in feeding territories relates to foraging success and offpring grown skuas Catharacta antárctica lonnbergi. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 1149-1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0543-7 Hardy, J. W. (1965). Flock social behavior of the Orange-fronted Parakeet. Condor, 67, 140-156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1365258 Joy, J. B. (2000). Characteristics of nest cavities and nest trees of the Red-breasted Sapsucker in coastal montane forests. Journal of Field Ornithology, 71, 525–530. https://doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-71.3.525 Kattán, G. H. y Gómez, N. (1992). Body temperature of Spectacled Parrotlet nestlings in relation to body mass and brood size. Condor, 94, 280-282. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1368818 Krause, J. y Ruxton, G. D. (2002). Living in groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lanning, D. V. y Shiflett, J. T. (1983). Nesting ecology of Thick-billed Parrots. Condor, 85, 66-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367891 Levinson, S. T. (1980). The social behavior of the White-fronted Amazon (Amazona albifrons). Conservation of New World Parrots. En R. F. Pasquier (ed.). Proceedings of the JCBP Parrot Working Group Meeting (pp. 403-417). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. Li, P. y Martin, T. E. (1991). Nest-site selection and nesting success of cavity-nesting birds in high elevation forest drainages. Auk, 108, 405-418. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/108.2.405 Lindsey, G. D. (1992). Nest guarding from observation blinds: strategy for improving Puerto Rican Parrot nest success. Journal Field Ornithology, 63, 466-472. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4513745 Marsden, S. J. y Jones, M. J. (1997). The nesting requirements of the parrots and hornbill of suma, Indonesia. Biological Conservation, 82, 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00038-4 Martin, T. E. y Roper, J. L. (1988). Nest predation and nest-site selection of a western population of the Hermit Thrush. Condor, 90, 51-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368432 Martin, T. E. y Roper, J. L. (1992). Interaction of nest predation and food limitation in reproductive strategies. Current Ornithology, 9, 163-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9921-7_5 Martin, T. E., Roper, J. L. y Li, P. (1992). Life history traits of open vs. cavity-nesting birds. Ecology, 73, 579-592. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940764 Moller, A. P. (1989). Parasites, predators and nest boxes: facts and artefacts in nest box studies of birds? Oikos, 56, 421-423. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3565628 Nilsson, S. G. (1984). The evolution of nest site selection among hole-nesting birds: the importance of nest predation and competition. Ornis Scandinavica, 15, 165–175. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3675958 Nilsson, S. G. (1986). Evolution of hole-nesting in birds: on balancing selection pressures. Auk, 103, 432-435. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4087101 Peterson, B. y Gauthier, G. (1985). Nest site use by cavity-nesting birds of the Caribou Parkland, British Columbia. Wilson Bulletin, 97, 319-331. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4162105 Poisbleau, M., Guillenain, M., Demongin, L. y Carslake, D. (2009). Within-brood social status and consequences for Winter hierarchies amongst mallard Anas platyrhynchos ducklings. Journal of Ornithology, 150, 195-204. DOI 10.1007/s10336-008-0334-6 Power, D. M. (1966). Agonistic behavior and vocalizations of Orange-chinned Parakeets in captivity. Condor, 68, 562-581. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1366264 Pribil, S. y Picman, J. (1991). Why House Wrens destroy clutches of other birds: a support for the nest site competition hypothesis. Condor, 93, 184-185. https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/condor/.../p0184-p0185.pdf Pulliam, H. R. y Caraco, T. (1984). Living in groups: Is there an optimal group size? En J. R. Krebs y N. B. Davies (eds.). Behavioral ecology. (2 ed.) (pp. 122-147). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. Rendell, W. B. y Robertson, R. J. (1989). Nest-site characteristics, reproductive success and cavity availability for Tree Swallows breeding in natural cavities. Condor, 91, 875-885. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1368072 Renton, K. (2004). Agonistic interactions of nesting and nonbreeding macaws. Condor, 106, 354-362. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/106.2.354 Rodríguez-Castillo, A. M. y Eberhard, J. R. (2006). Reproductive behavior of the productive behavior of the Yellow-crowned Parrot (Amazona ochrocephala) in western Panama. Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 118, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1676/05-003.1 Rogers, L. J. y McCulloch, H. (1981). Pair-bonding in the Galah Cacatua roseicapilla. Bird Behaviour, 3, 80-92. https://doi.org/10.3727/015613881791560694 Sánchez–Martínez, T. C. y Renton, K. (2009). Availibility and selection of arboreal termitaria as nest-sites by Orange-fronted Parakeets Aratinga canicularis in conserved and modified landscapes in Mexico. Ibis, 151 (2), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.00911.x Skeate, S. T. (1984). Courtship and reproductive behaviour of captive White-fronted Amazon Parrots Amazona albifrons. Bird Behaviour, 5, 103-109. Snyder, N. F. R., Wiley, J. W. y Kepler, C. B. (1987). The Parrots of Luquillo: Natural History and Conservation of the Puerto Rican Parrot. Los Angeles: Western Foundation of Vertebrate Zoology. Stauffer, D. E. y Best, L. B. (1982). Nest site selection by cavity-nesting of riparian habitats in Iowa. Wilson Bulletin, 94, 329-337. http://www.jstor.com/stable/4161643 Strahl, S. D., Desenne, P. A., Jimenez, J. L. y Goldstein, I. R. (1991). Behavior and biology of the Hawk-Headed Parrot, Deroptyus accipitrinus, in Southern Venezuela. Condor, 93, 177-180. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1368622 Waltman, J. R. y Beissinger, S. T. (1992). Breeding behavior of the Green-Rumped Parrotlet. Wilson Bulletin, 104, 65-84. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4163117 Wanker, R. (1990). Beiträge zur Ökologie und Sperlingspapageis (Forpus conspicillatus) Diplomarbeit (Tesis de grado). Universität Hamburg. Wanker, R. (1999). Socialization in Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): how juveniles compensate for the lack of siblings. Acta Ethological, 2, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012228 Wanker, R. y Fischer, J. (2001). Intra-and interindividual variation in the contact calls of Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus). Behaviour, 138, 709-726. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853901752233361 Wanker, R., Apcin, J., Jennerjahn, B. y Waibel, B. (1998). Discrimination of different socialcompanions in Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): evidence for individual vocal recognition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 43, 197-202. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4601505 Wanker, R., Cruz Bernate, L. y Franck, D. (1996). Socialization of Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): The role of parents, creches and sibling groups in nature. Journal für Ornithologie, 137, 447-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01661101
type_driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content	Text
publishDate	2020-01-01
date_accessioned	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
date_available	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
url	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/view/4335
url_doi	https://doi.org/10.17151/bccm.2021.25.1.5
issn	0123-3068
eissn	2462-8190
doi	10.17151/bccm.2021.25.1.5
citationstartpage	71
citationendpage	86
url2_str_mv	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/download/4335/3985
_version_	1811199568920969216

¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae) .

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares

¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
.