Titulo:
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn
.
Sumario:
En este artículo postulamos que el trabajo de Kuhn es una revolución filosófica para la filosofía de la ciencia. La búsqueda de revoluciones filosóficas es una extensión de las ideas de Kuhn acerca de las revoluciones científicas. Las revoluciones filosóficas se distinguen de las revoluciones científicas en algunos aspectos que discutimos en este trabajo. Defendemos que la revolución kuhniana consiste en la naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia que se desprende de sus trabajos y discutimos la analogía biológica que Kuhn empleó como un ejemplo ilustrativo.
Guardado en:
0124-6127
2462-9596
17
2015-01-01
47
66
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2016
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article_2952 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn Kuhn’s philosophical revolution En este artículo postulamos que el trabajo de Kuhn es una revolución filosófica para la filosofía de la ciencia. La búsqueda de revoluciones filosóficas es una extensión de las ideas de Kuhn acerca de las revoluciones científicas. Las revoluciones filosóficas se distinguen de las revoluciones científicas en algunos aspectos que discutimos en este trabajo. Defendemos que la revolución kuhniana consiste en la naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia que se desprende de sus trabajos y discutimos la analogía biológica que Kuhn empleó como un ejemplo ilustrativo. In this paper we propose that Kuhn's work constitutes a philosophical revolution in the Philosophy of Science. The search for philosophical revolutions is an extension of Kuhn's ideas about scientific revolutions severed from the scientific field. Revolutions in Philosophy are different from those in Science due to some relevant aspects which we briefly discuss in this work. We argue that the Kuhnian philosophical revolution consists in the naturalization of the Philosophy of Science which we find in his writings, finally we discuss Kuhn's biological analogy as an illustrative instance. G. Laguna, Humberto Miramontes, Pedro Cocho, Germinal Revolución filosófica naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia revolución kuhniana paradigma filosófico kuhniano Philosophical revolution aturalization of the philosophy of science Kuhnian revolution Kuhnian philosophical paradigm 17 28 Núm. 28 , Año 2016 : Enero - Junio Artículo de revista Journal article 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z 2015-01-01 application/pdf Universidad de Caldas Discusiones Filosóficas 0124-6127 2462-9596 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2952 10.17151/difil.2016.17.28.4 https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2016.17.28.4 spa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Discusiones Filosóficas - 2016 47 66 Alsina, José. “Modelos de cambio científico a partir de la selección natural: análisis y propuestas”. LLULL, Revista de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias y de las Técnicas. 29, 2006: 221-257. Impreso. Barlas, Yaman. “Comments on ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 43-47. Impreso. Bird, Alexander. “The Kuhn’s wrong turning”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 33, 2002: 443-463. Impreso. ___. “Naturalizing Kuhn”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Jun. 2005: 99-117. Impreso. ___. “La filosofía de la historia de la ciencia de Thomas Kuhn”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul. 13(21), 2012(a): 167-185. Impreso. ___. “Kuhn, Naturalism and the Social Study of Science”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012(b). Impreso. Bornholdt, S.; Jensen, M.H.; Sneppen, K. “Emergence and Decline of Scientific Paradigms”. Physical Review Letters. 106, 2011:058701. Impreso. Chae, Huiseung; Yook, Soon-Hyung; Kim, Yup. “Phase Transitions in Paradigm Shift Models”. PLoS ONE. 8, 2013: e70928. Impreso. Chang, Hasok. “Incommensurability: Revisiting the Chemical Revolution”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012: 153-177. Impreso. De Langhe, Rogier. “The Kuhnian Paradigm”. Topoi - An International Review of Philosophy. 32, 2013: 65- 73. Impreso. ___. “A comparison of two models of scientific progress”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 46, 2014: 94-99. Impreso. Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution”. Foundations of Chemistry. 10(2), 2008: 101-115. Impreso. Jogalekar, Ashutosh. “Chemistry and Biology: Kuhnian or Galisonian?” The curious wave function. Scientific American Blog Network. 2012. Consultado: Sep 18, 2015. Online. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curious-wavefunction/chemistry-galisonian-rather-than-kuhnian/Jones, Keith. “Is Kuhn a sociologist?”. The British Journal of Philosophy of Science. 37, 1986: 443-452. Impreso Kuhn, Thomas S. La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2013. Impreso. ___. The road since structure: philosophical essays, 1970-1993, with an autobiographical interview. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Impreso. Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. “Revolution as Evolution. The concept of evolution in Kuhn’s philosophy”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012: 134-152. Impreso. Mauskopf, Seymour H. “Thomas S. Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution”. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences. 42(5), 2012: 551-556. Impreso. Mayr, Ernst. “Do Thomas Kuhn’s scientific revolution take place”. What Makes Biology Unique? Considerations on the Autonomy of a Scientific Discipline. USA: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 159-170. Impreso. ___. “The Nature of the Darwinian Revolution”. Science. 176 (4038), 1972: 981-989. Impreso. Radzicki, Michael. “Reflections on ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 49-53. Impreso. Reichenbach, Hans. Experience and Prediction: An analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938. Impreso. Renzi, Barbara. “Kuhn’s Evolutionary Epistemology and Its Being Undermined by Inadequate Biological Concepts”. Philosophy of Science. 76 (2), 2009:143-159. Impreso. Reydon, Thomas; Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Discussion: Kuhn’s Evolutionary Analogy in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and The Road Since Structure”. Philosophy of Science. 77(3), 2010: 468-476. Impreso. Ruse, Michael. “Was there a Darwinian Revolution? Yes, no, and maybe!” Endeavour. 38(3-4), 2014: 159-168. Impreso. ___. “The Darwinian revolution: Rethinking its meaning and significance”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106, 2009: 10040-10047. Impreso. Sánchez Vázquez, Adolfo. “Las revoluciones filosóficas: de Kant a Marx”. Filosofía y circunstancias. Rubí (Barcelona): Anthropos; México: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM, 1997. Impreso. Sterman, John D. “The growth of knowledge: Testing a theory of scientific revolutions with a formal model”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 28(2), 1985: 93-122. Impreso. ___. “Response to ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 35-42. Impreso. Sterman, John D.; Wittenberg, Jason. “Competition and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolutions”. Proceedings of the International System Dynamics Conference. Cancun: Monterey Institute of Technology, 1993. Impreso. Wittenberg, Jason. “On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 21-33. Impreso. Wittenberg, Jason; Sterman, John D. “Path Dependence, Competition, and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolution”. Organization Science. May. 10(3), 1999: 322-341. Impreso. Wray, K. Brad. “Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?” Social Studies of Science. 33(1), 2003: 137-149. Impreso. ___. Kuhn’s evolutionary social epistemology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Impreso. ___. “Assessing the influence of Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions”. Metascience. 21, 2012: 1-10. Impreso. https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/2952/2730 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Discusiones Filosóficas |
| title |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn |
| spellingShingle |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn G. Laguna, Humberto Miramontes, Pedro Cocho, Germinal Revolución filosófica naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia revolución kuhniana paradigma filosófico kuhniano Philosophical revolution aturalization of the philosophy of science Kuhnian revolution Kuhnian philosophical paradigm |
| title_short |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn |
| title_full |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn |
| title_fullStr |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn |
| title_full_unstemmed |
La revolución filosófica de Kuhn |
| title_sort |
la revolución filosófica de kuhn |
| title_eng |
Kuhn’s philosophical revolution |
| description |
En este artículo postulamos que el trabajo de Kuhn es una revolución filosófica para la filosofía de la ciencia. La búsqueda de revoluciones filosóficas es una extensión de las ideas de Kuhn acerca de las revoluciones científicas. Las revoluciones filosóficas se distinguen de las revoluciones científicas en algunos aspectos que discutimos en este trabajo. Defendemos que la revolución kuhniana consiste en la naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia que se desprende de sus trabajos y discutimos la analogía biológica que Kuhn empleó como un ejemplo ilustrativo.
|
| description_eng |
In this paper we propose that Kuhn's work constitutes a philosophical revolution in the Philosophy of Science. The search for philosophical revolutions is an extension of Kuhn's ideas about scientific revolutions severed from the scientific field. Revolutions in Philosophy are different from those in Science due to some relevant aspects which we briefly discuss in this work. We argue that the Kuhnian philosophical revolution consists in the naturalization of the Philosophy of Science which we find in his writings, finally we discuss Kuhn's biological analogy as an illustrative instance.
|
| author |
G. Laguna, Humberto Miramontes, Pedro Cocho, Germinal |
| author_facet |
G. Laguna, Humberto Miramontes, Pedro Cocho, Germinal |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Revolución filosófica naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia revolución kuhniana paradigma filosófico kuhniano |
| topic |
Revolución filosófica naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia revolución kuhniana paradigma filosófico kuhniano Philosophical revolution aturalization of the philosophy of science Kuhnian revolution Kuhnian philosophical paradigm |
| topic_facet |
Revolución filosófica naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia revolución kuhniana paradigma filosófico kuhniano Philosophical revolution aturalization of the philosophy of science Kuhnian revolution Kuhnian philosophical paradigm |
| citationvolume |
17 |
| citationissue |
28 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 28 , Año 2016 : Enero - Junio |
| publisher |
Universidad de Caldas |
| ispartofjournal |
Discusiones Filosóficas |
| source |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2952 |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Discusiones Filosóficas - 2016 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references |
Alsina, José. “Modelos de cambio científico a partir de la selección natural: análisis y propuestas”. LLULL, Revista de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias y de las Técnicas. 29, 2006: 221-257. Impreso. Barlas, Yaman. “Comments on ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 43-47. Impreso. Bird, Alexander. “The Kuhn’s wrong turning”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 33, 2002: 443-463. Impreso. ___. “Naturalizing Kuhn”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Jun. 2005: 99-117. Impreso. ___. “La filosofía de la historia de la ciencia de Thomas Kuhn”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul. 13(21), 2012(a): 167-185. Impreso. ___. “Kuhn, Naturalism and the Social Study of Science”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012(b). Impreso. Bornholdt, S.; Jensen, M.H.; Sneppen, K. “Emergence and Decline of Scientific Paradigms”. Physical Review Letters. 106, 2011:058701. Impreso. Chae, Huiseung; Yook, Soon-Hyung; Kim, Yup. “Phase Transitions in Paradigm Shift Models”. PLoS ONE. 8, 2013: e70928. Impreso. Chang, Hasok. “Incommensurability: Revisiting the Chemical Revolution”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012: 153-177. Impreso. De Langhe, Rogier. “The Kuhnian Paradigm”. Topoi - An International Review of Philosophy. 32, 2013: 65- 73. Impreso. ___. “A comparison of two models of scientific progress”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 46, 2014: 94-99. Impreso. Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution”. Foundations of Chemistry. 10(2), 2008: 101-115. Impreso. Jogalekar, Ashutosh. “Chemistry and Biology: Kuhnian or Galisonian?” The curious wave function. Scientific American Blog Network. 2012. Consultado: Sep 18, 2015. Online. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curious-wavefunction/chemistry-galisonian-rather-than-kuhnian/Jones, Keith. “Is Kuhn a sociologist?”. The British Journal of Philosophy of Science. 37, 1986: 443-452. Impreso Kuhn, Thomas S. La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2013. Impreso. ___. The road since structure: philosophical essays, 1970-1993, with an autobiographical interview. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Impreso. Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. “Revolution as Evolution. The concept of evolution in Kuhn’s philosophy”. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2012: 134-152. Impreso. Mauskopf, Seymour H. “Thomas S. Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution”. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences. 42(5), 2012: 551-556. Impreso. Mayr, Ernst. “Do Thomas Kuhn’s scientific revolution take place”. What Makes Biology Unique? Considerations on the Autonomy of a Scientific Discipline. USA: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 159-170. Impreso. ___. “The Nature of the Darwinian Revolution”. Science. 176 (4038), 1972: 981-989. Impreso. Radzicki, Michael. “Reflections on ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 49-53. Impreso. Reichenbach, Hans. Experience and Prediction: An analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938. Impreso. Renzi, Barbara. “Kuhn’s Evolutionary Epistemology and Its Being Undermined by Inadequate Biological Concepts”. Philosophy of Science. 76 (2), 2009:143-159. Impreso. Reydon, Thomas; Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Discussion: Kuhn’s Evolutionary Analogy in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and The Road Since Structure”. Philosophy of Science. 77(3), 2010: 468-476. Impreso. Ruse, Michael. “Was there a Darwinian Revolution? Yes, no, and maybe!” Endeavour. 38(3-4), 2014: 159-168. Impreso. ___. “The Darwinian revolution: Rethinking its meaning and significance”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106, 2009: 10040-10047. Impreso. Sánchez Vázquez, Adolfo. “Las revoluciones filosóficas: de Kant a Marx”. Filosofía y circunstancias. Rubí (Barcelona): Anthropos; México: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM, 1997. Impreso. Sterman, John D. “The growth of knowledge: Testing a theory of scientific revolutions with a formal model”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 28(2), 1985: 93-122. Impreso. ___. “Response to ‘On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science’”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 35-42. Impreso. Sterman, John D.; Wittenberg, Jason. “Competition and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolutions”. Proceedings of the International System Dynamics Conference. Cancun: Monterey Institute of Technology, 1993. Impreso. Wittenberg, Jason. “On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science”. System Dynamics Review. Winter 8(1), 1992: 21-33. Impreso. Wittenberg, Jason; Sterman, John D. “Path Dependence, Competition, and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolution”. Organization Science. May. 10(3), 1999: 322-341. Impreso. Wray, K. Brad. “Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?” Social Studies of Science. 33(1), 2003: 137-149. Impreso. ___. Kuhn’s evolutionary social epistemology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Impreso. ___. “Assessing the influence of Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions”. Metascience. 21, 2012: 1-10. Impreso. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
| date_accessioned |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2952 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2016.17.28.4 |
| issn |
0124-6127 |
| eissn |
2462-9596 |
| doi |
10.17151/difil.2016.17.28.4 |
| citationstartpage |
47 |
| citationendpage |
66 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/2952/2730 |
| _version_ |
1811199610441433088 |