Titulo:
Intención y experiencia: retos para una teoría de la atención conjunta
.
Sumario:
Este artículo defiende que la teorización sobre la capacidad para atención conjunta debe esclarecer los conceptos de intención y experiencia: una tarea eminentemente filosófica. Se exponen los aspectos psicológicos relevantes, las posiciones teóricas más destacadas y se analiza filosóficamente el estado de la cuestión. Se concluye que no hay consenso interteórico sobre los aspectos operacionales ni sobre los funcionales que definen la capacidad, y que la inmadurez de la teoría se debe a una elaboración todavía precaria de sus conceptos centrales, intención y experiencia, tarea en la que la filosofía realizaría un aporte decisivo.
Guardado en:
0124-6127
2462-9596
19
2018-01-01
97
115
Discusiones Filosóficas - 2018
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article_2845 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Intención y experiencia: retos para una teoría de la atención conjunta Intention and experience: challenges for a theory of joint attention Este artículo defiende que la teorización sobre la capacidad para atención conjunta debe esclarecer los conceptos de intención y experiencia: una tarea eminentemente filosófica. Se exponen los aspectos psicológicos relevantes, las posiciones teóricas más destacadas y se analiza filosóficamente el estado de la cuestión. Se concluye que no hay consenso interteórico sobre los aspectos operacionales ni sobre los funcionales que definen la capacidad, y que la inmadurez de la teoría se debe a una elaboración todavía precaria de sus conceptos centrales, intención y experiencia, tarea en la que la filosofía realizaría un aporte decisivo. This paper defends that the theorization on the capacity for joint attention must clarify the concepts of experience and intention: a purely philosophical enterprise. The text exposes the main psychological aspects of the capacity, the most relevant theories on it and philosophically analyses the subject. It is concluded that there is no mature consensus among theories about the operational and functional role of joint attention, and that the immaturity of the theory rests on a deficient elaboration of the main concepts of intention and experience, a task in hich philosophy makes a significant contribution. Pérez-Jimén, Miguel Ángel Suárez-Acevedo, Camila Atención conjunta experiencia intención filosofía de la psicología Joint attention experience intention philosophy of psychology 19 32 Núm. 32 , Año 2018 : Enero - Junio Artículo de revista Journal article 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z 2018-01-01 application/pdf Universidad de Caldas Discusiones Filosóficas 0124-6127 2462-9596 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2845 10.17151/difil.2018.19.32.7 https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2018.19.32.7 spa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Discusiones Filosóficas - 2018 97 115 Acero, Juan José. “Intención y aserción”. Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 26 (2). 2007:19-39. Web. Baron-Cohen, Simon. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 1995. Print. ---. “The Eye Detection Detector (EDD) and the Shared Attention Mechanism (SAM): Two Cases for Evolutionary Psychology”. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 41-59. Print. Bruner, Jerome. Child’s talk. Learning to Use Language. New York: Oxford University Press. 1983. Print. ---.“From Joint Attention to the Meeting of Minds: An Introduction”. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 1-14. Print. Butterworth, George. “Origins of Mind in Perception and Action”. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. Nueva York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 29-40. Print. Carpenter, Melinda, et al. “Social Cognition, Joint Attention, and Communicative Competence from 9 to 15 Months of Age” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63 (4). 1998: 1-174. Web. Casasanto, Daniel. “Linguistic Relativity” Routledge handbook of semantics. New York: Routledge, 2016, 158-174. Print. Corkum, Valerie and Chris Moore. “Development of Joint Visual Attention in Infants” Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 61-83. Print. Davidson, Donald. Mente, mundo y acción. Barcelona: Paidós. 1992. Impreso. Escudero-Sanz, Alfonso, et al. “Aparición y desarrollo de la atención conjunta en la infancia” Anales de psicología, 29 (2). 2013: 402-412. Web. Gopnik, Alison and Henry Wellman. “Why the child’s Theory of Mind really is a Theory?” Folk psychology. Cambridge: Wiley Blackwell. 1995. 233-258. Print. Grice, Paul. “Logic and Conversation” Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts Nueva York: Academic Press. 1975: 41-58. Web. Gunther, York. Essays on Nonconceptual Content. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 2003. Print. Hobson, Peter. “On Sharing Experiences” Development and psychopathology, 1. 1989: 197-203. Web. ---.“What Puts the Jointness in Joint Attention?” Joint Attention, Communication and Other Minds. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005. 185-204. Print. Hobson, Peter and Jessica Hobson. “Joint Attention or Joint Engagement? Insights from Autism” Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. 115-135. Print. Kim, Jaegwon. Philosophy of Mind. Boulder: Westview Press. 2006. Print. Kita, Sotaro. Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2003. Print. Moore, Chris and Philip Dunham. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. Print Pérez Jiménez, Miguel Ángel. La aparición del pensamiento. Una enmienda emotiva a la tesis de Donald Davidson. Granada: Universidad de Granada. 2009. Impreso. Racine, Timothy. The Role of Shared Practice in the Origins of Joint Attention and Pointing. Simon Fraser University. 2005. Web. ---.Getting beyond rich and lean views of joint attention” Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. 21-42. Print. Reddy, Vasudevi. “A Gaze at Grips with Me” Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. 137-157. Print. Scaife, Michael and Jerome Bruner. “The capacity of joint visual attention in the infant”. Nature, 253. 1975: 265-266. Web. Seeman, Axel. Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. Print. Sigman, Marian and Connie Kasari. “Joint Attention across Contexts in Normal and Autistic Children” Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 189-203. Print. Solomon, Robert. Ética emocional: Una teoría de los sentimientos. Barcelona: Paidós. 2007. Impreso. Tomasello, Michael and Jodie Todd. “Joint Attention and Early Lexical Acquisition Style” First language, 4. 1983: 197-212. Web. Tomasello, Michael and Anne Cale Kruger. “Joint Attention on Actions. Acquiring Verbs in Ostensive and Non-Ostensive Contexts” Journal of Child Language, 19. 1992: 311-333. Web. Tomasello, Michael et al. “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Social Cognition”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28. 2005: 675-735. Web. Tomasello, Michael. “The Role of Joint Attention in Early Language Development” Language Sciences, 11. 1988: 69-88. Web. ---. “Joint Attention as Social Cognition”. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 103-130. Print. ---. Los orígenes culturales de la cognición humana. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores. 2007. Impreso. Trevarthen, Colwyn. “Los motivos primordiales para entenderse y cooperar” La comunicación preverbal, Barcelona: Ediciones Avesta. 1982. Impreso. ---. “The Generation of Human Meaning: How Shared Experience Grows in Infancy”. Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. 73-113. Print. Wellman, Henry. The Child’s Theory of Mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 1990. Print. Werner, Heinz and Bernard Kaplan. Symbol formation. New York: Psychology Press. 1963. Print. Wilde, Janet and Jodie Baird. Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. 2005. Print. https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/2845/2629 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Discusiones Filosóficas |
| title |
Intención y experiencia: retos para una teoría de la atención conjunta |
| spellingShingle |
Intención y experiencia: retos para una teoría de la atención conjunta Pérez-Jimén, Miguel Ángel Suárez-Acevedo, Camila Atención conjunta experiencia intención filosofía de la psicología Joint attention experience intention philosophy of psychology |
| title_short |
Intención y experiencia: retos para una teoría de la atención conjunta |
| title_full |
Intención y experiencia: retos para una teoría de la atención conjunta |
| title_fullStr |
Intención y experiencia: retos para una teoría de la atención conjunta |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Intención y experiencia: retos para una teoría de la atención conjunta |
| title_sort |
intención y experiencia: retos para una teoría de la atención conjunta |
| title_eng |
Intention and experience: challenges for a theory of joint attention |
| description |
Este artículo defiende que la teorización sobre la capacidad para atención conjunta debe esclarecer los conceptos de intención y experiencia: una tarea eminentemente filosófica. Se exponen los aspectos psicológicos relevantes, las posiciones teóricas más destacadas y se analiza filosóficamente el estado de la cuestión. Se concluye que no hay consenso interteórico sobre los aspectos operacionales ni sobre los funcionales que definen la capacidad, y que la inmadurez de la teoría se debe a una elaboración todavía precaria de sus conceptos centrales, intención y experiencia, tarea en la que la filosofía realizaría un aporte decisivo.
|
| description_eng |
This paper defends that the theorization on the capacity for joint attention must clarify the concepts of experience and intention: a purely philosophical enterprise. The text exposes the main psychological aspects of the capacity, the most relevant theories on it and philosophically analyses the subject. It is concluded that there is no mature consensus among theories about the operational and functional role of joint attention, and that the immaturity of the theory rests on a deficient elaboration of the main concepts of intention and experience, a task in hich philosophy makes a significant contribution.
|
| author |
Pérez-Jimén, Miguel Ángel Suárez-Acevedo, Camila |
| author_facet |
Pérez-Jimén, Miguel Ángel Suárez-Acevedo, Camila |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Atención conjunta experiencia intención filosofía de la psicología |
| topic |
Atención conjunta experiencia intención filosofía de la psicología Joint attention experience intention philosophy of psychology |
| topic_facet |
Atención conjunta experiencia intención filosofía de la psicología Joint attention experience intention philosophy of psychology |
| citationvolume |
19 |
| citationissue |
32 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 32 , Año 2018 : Enero - Junio |
| publisher |
Universidad de Caldas |
| ispartofjournal |
Discusiones Filosóficas |
| source |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2845 |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Discusiones Filosóficas - 2018 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references |
Acero, Juan José. “Intención y aserción”. Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 26 (2). 2007:19-39. Web. Baron-Cohen, Simon. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 1995. Print. ---. “The Eye Detection Detector (EDD) and the Shared Attention Mechanism (SAM): Two Cases for Evolutionary Psychology”. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 41-59. Print. Bruner, Jerome. Child’s talk. Learning to Use Language. New York: Oxford University Press. 1983. Print. ---.“From Joint Attention to the Meeting of Minds: An Introduction”. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 1-14. Print. Butterworth, George. “Origins of Mind in Perception and Action”. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. Nueva York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 29-40. Print. Carpenter, Melinda, et al. “Social Cognition, Joint Attention, and Communicative Competence from 9 to 15 Months of Age” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63 (4). 1998: 1-174. Web. Casasanto, Daniel. “Linguistic Relativity” Routledge handbook of semantics. New York: Routledge, 2016, 158-174. Print. Corkum, Valerie and Chris Moore. “Development of Joint Visual Attention in Infants” Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 61-83. Print. Davidson, Donald. Mente, mundo y acción. Barcelona: Paidós. 1992. Impreso. Escudero-Sanz, Alfonso, et al. “Aparición y desarrollo de la atención conjunta en la infancia” Anales de psicología, 29 (2). 2013: 402-412. Web. Gopnik, Alison and Henry Wellman. “Why the child’s Theory of Mind really is a Theory?” Folk psychology. Cambridge: Wiley Blackwell. 1995. 233-258. Print. Grice, Paul. “Logic and Conversation” Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts Nueva York: Academic Press. 1975: 41-58. Web. Gunther, York. Essays on Nonconceptual Content. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 2003. Print. Hobson, Peter. “On Sharing Experiences” Development and psychopathology, 1. 1989: 197-203. Web. ---.“What Puts the Jointness in Joint Attention?” Joint Attention, Communication and Other Minds. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005. 185-204. Print. Hobson, Peter and Jessica Hobson. “Joint Attention or Joint Engagement? Insights from Autism” Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. 115-135. Print. Kim, Jaegwon. Philosophy of Mind. Boulder: Westview Press. 2006. Print. Kita, Sotaro. Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2003. Print. Moore, Chris and Philip Dunham. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. Print Pérez Jiménez, Miguel Ángel. La aparición del pensamiento. Una enmienda emotiva a la tesis de Donald Davidson. Granada: Universidad de Granada. 2009. Impreso. Racine, Timothy. The Role of Shared Practice in the Origins of Joint Attention and Pointing. Simon Fraser University. 2005. Web. ---.Getting beyond rich and lean views of joint attention” Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. 21-42. Print. Reddy, Vasudevi. “A Gaze at Grips with Me” Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. 137-157. Print. Scaife, Michael and Jerome Bruner. “The capacity of joint visual attention in the infant”. Nature, 253. 1975: 265-266. Web. Seeman, Axel. Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. Print. Sigman, Marian and Connie Kasari. “Joint Attention across Contexts in Normal and Autistic Children” Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 189-203. Print. Solomon, Robert. Ética emocional: Una teoría de los sentimientos. Barcelona: Paidós. 2007. Impreso. Tomasello, Michael and Jodie Todd. “Joint Attention and Early Lexical Acquisition Style” First language, 4. 1983: 197-212. Web. Tomasello, Michael and Anne Cale Kruger. “Joint Attention on Actions. Acquiring Verbs in Ostensive and Non-Ostensive Contexts” Journal of Child Language, 19. 1992: 311-333. Web. Tomasello, Michael et al. “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Social Cognition”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28. 2005: 675-735. Web. Tomasello, Michael. “The Role of Joint Attention in Early Language Development” Language Sciences, 11. 1988: 69-88. Web. ---. “Joint Attention as Social Cognition”. Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1995. 103-130. Print. ---. Los orígenes culturales de la cognición humana. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores. 2007. Impreso. Trevarthen, Colwyn. “Los motivos primordiales para entenderse y cooperar” La comunicación preverbal, Barcelona: Ediciones Avesta. 1982. Impreso. ---. “The Generation of Human Meaning: How Shared Experience Grows in Infancy”. Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience. London: The MIT Press. 2011. 73-113. Print. Wellman, Henry. The Child’s Theory of Mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 1990. Print. Werner, Heinz and Bernard Kaplan. Symbol formation. New York: Psychology Press. 1963. Print. Wilde, Janet and Jodie Baird. Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. 2005. Print. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
| date_accessioned |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2845 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2018.19.32.7 |
| issn |
0124-6127 |
| eissn |
2462-9596 |
| doi |
10.17151/difil.2018.19.32.7 |
| citationstartpage |
97 |
| citationendpage |
115 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/2845/2629 |
| _version_ |
1811199605135638528 |