Titulo:

El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos.
.

Sumario:

En años recientes se han visto una proliferación de mesas musicales, partiendo del hecho que esto no es solo una moda de mesas. Este artículo discute las razones por las cuales las interfaces de mesa son interfaces musicales promisorias; luego, se presenta el reactable, un instrumento musical basado en una interfaz de mesa que ejemplifica varios de estos logros potenciales.

Guardado en:

1794-7111

2462-8115

6

2009-01-01

201

223

Revista Kepes - 2015

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article-429
record_format ojs
spelling El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos.
interpretación musical
Puckette, M. (2002). “Max at 17er Music Journal, 26(4): (2002), 31-43. ReacTIVision. httg.upf.edu/reactable/?software [. Referenced October 20, 2006]
Pressing, J. (1990). “Cybernetic Issues in Interactive Performance Systems”. Music Journal, 14(1): (1990), 12-25
Pressing, J. (1984). “Cognitive rocesses in Improvisation”. Iin Ray Crozier and Anthony Chapman (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in the Peczier and Anthony Chapmanand, Amsterdam (1984), 345-363.
Buxton, W., Patel, S., Reevs, W., and Baecker, R. (1982). “Object and the Design of Timbral Resources”. Computer Music Journal, 982), 32-44.
Bischoff, J., Gold, R. and Horton, J. (1978). “Music for an interactive Network of Computers”. Computer Music Journal, 2(3), 24-29.
Bencina, R., Kaltenbrunner, M. and Jordà, S. (2005). “Improved Topological Fiducial Tracking in the reacTIVision System”. Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Projector-Camera Syste5).
____. (2002). “Improvising with Computers: A personal Survey (1989-2001)” Journal of New Music R1(1): (2002), 1-10.
En años recientes se han visto una proliferación de mesas musicales, partiendo del hecho que esto no es solo una moda de mesas. Este artículo discute las razones por las cuales las interfaces de mesa son interfaces musicales promisorias; luego, se presenta el reactable, un instrumento musical basado en una interfaz de mesa que ejemplifica varios de estos logros potenciales.
Jordà, Sergi
reactable
interfaces tangibles
interfaces de mesa
instrumento musical
diseño
Turner, T. (2003). The Resonance of the Cubicle: Laptop Performance in Post-digital Musicporary Music Review, 22(4): (2003). 81-92.
técnicas de interacción
6
Núm. 5 , Año 2009 : Enero - Diciembre 2009
5
application/pdf
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/429
Bencina, R. and Kaltenbrunner, M. (2005). “The Design and Evolution of Fiducials for the reacTIVision System”. Proc. 3rd International Conference on Generative Systems in the Electronic Ar5).
Revista Kepes - 2015
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Español
Publication
Kepes
Universidad de Caldas
Shen, C., Lesh, N. and Vernier, F. (2003). “Personal Digital Historian: Story Sharing Around th In Interactions, 0(2): (2003), 15-22. SmallFish.: http/hosting. zkm.de/wmuench/small_fish, [Referenced October 20, 2006].
Artículo de revista
Ullmer B. and Ishii, H. (2001). “Emerging Frameworks for Tangible User Interfaces”. In John M. Carroll (Ed.), Human-Computer Interactio (pp. 579-601). rroll, Addison-Wesley (2001), 579-601.
Cutler, M., Robair, G. and Bean. (2000). “Outer Limits”. Electronic Musician Magazine, (2000, 49-72.
Mazalek, A. (2005). Media Tables: An extensible method for developing multi-user media interaction platforms for sharedspaces. PhD. Dissertation., Massachusetitute of Technology (2005).
Kaltenbrunner, M. http://ww.iua.upf.emtg/reactable/ ?related [.Referenced October 20, 2006].
Kaltenbrunner, M., Geiger, G. and Jordà, S. (2004). “Dynamic Patches for Live Musical Performance”. Proc. International Conference on New Interfaces for Musiression (NIME-04), (2004) 19-22.
Jordà, S. (2005). Digital Lutherie: Crafting musical computers for new musics performance and improvisatin. PhD. Dissertation., Universitat Pabra, Barcelona.
Jordà, S., Kaltenbrunner, M., Geiger, G. and Bencina, R. The reactable*. Proc.International Computer Music Conference (2005)
Ullmer, B. (2002). Tangible Interfaces for Manipulating Aggregates of Digtal Information. Ph.D. Dissertation., usetts Institute of Technology (2002).
_____. (2002). “FMOL: Toward User-Friendly, Sophisticated New Musical Instruments”. Computer Musi, 26(3): (2002), 23-39.
Jordà, S. (1999). “Faust Music On Line (FMOL): An approach to Real-time Collective Composition on the Internet”. Leonardo Musl, 9: (1999). 5-12.
Patten, J., Ishii, H., Hnes, J., Pangaro, G. (2001)., “Sensetable: A Wireless Object Tracking Platform for Tangible User Ies”. Proc. ACM CHI ‘01 (2001), 253-260.
Hornecker, E. and Buur, J. (2006). “Getting a Grip on Tangible Interaction: A Framework on Physical Space and Social Interaction”. PI 2006 (2006), 437-446. Ishii, H and Ullmer, B. (1997). “Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bitsd Atoms”. InCHI 97 (1997), 22-27.
Gaver, W.W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellerson, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., Steed, A., Villars, N. and Walker, B. (2004). “The drift table: designing for ludic engagement”. Proc CHI ‘04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing syste Press(2004), 885-–900.
Fitts, P. M. and Posner, M. I. (1967). Human Performance. Belmont, CAs/ Cole (1967).
Fitts, P. M. (1951). “Engineering Psychology and Equipment Design”. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology (pp. 17-1340). i1287-1340.
_______. (2003) Sonigraphical Instruments: From FMOL to the reactable*. Proc. International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 70-76.
Chadabe, J. (1975). “The Voltage-controlled synthesizer”. In John Applton (Eed.), The development and practice of electronic music. New Jersey: Prentl (1975). Chomsky, N. (1956). “Three models for the description of lnguage””. IRE Transactions on Information hor(1956), 113-124.
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Buxton, W. (1997). “Artists and the art of the luthiers”. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 3997, 10-–11.
_______. (2006). “Interaction Techniques for Musical Performance with Tatop Tangible Interfaces”. In ACE 2006 Advances in Computer EntertaHollywood, California, (2006).
Vertegaal, R. and Eaglestone, B. (1996). “Comparison of input devices in an ISEE direct timbre manipulation tasacting with Computers, 8(1): (1996), 13-30. Wanderley, M. M. (2001). Performer-Instrument Interaction: Applications toGestural Control of Music. Ph.D thesis., Uni Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI (2001).
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Wilson, A.D. (2005). “PlayAnywhere: a compact interactive tbletop projectionvision system”. Proc. 18th annual ACM symposium on User inter software and ogy, ew York, NY, USA, ACM Press (2005), 83-–92.
Blaine, T. and Perkis, T. (2000). “Jam-O-Drum, A Study Interaction Design”. Proc. ACM DIS 2000 Conference. NY: ACM(2000).
Patten, J., Reht, B. and Ishii, H. (2002)., “Audiopad: A Tag-based Interface for Musical Performance”. Proc. Conference on New Intfor Musical Expression (2002), 24-26.
Moog, R. (2004). Keynote speech at the Conference on New Interor Musical Expression (2004).
musical performance
tangible interfaces
interaction techniques
design
Journal article
musical instrument
tabletop interfaces
The reactable: Tabletop tangible intrefaces for multihreaded musical performance.
Abstract In recent years we have seen a proliferation of musical tables. Believing that this is not just the result of a tabletop trend, in this paper I first discuss the reasons that make tabletop interfaces promising musical interfaces. After that, I present the reactable, a musical instrument based on a tabletop interface that exemplifies several of these potential achievements.
reactable
2009-01-01
2462-8115
1794-7111
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/429
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/429/354
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z
201
223
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Kepes
title El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos.
spellingShingle El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos.
Jordà, Sergi
interpretación musical
reactable
interfaces tangibles
interfaces de mesa
instrumento musical
diseño
técnicas de interacción
musical performance
tangible interfaces
interaction techniques
design
musical instrument
tabletop interfaces
reactable
title_short El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos.
title_full El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos.
title_fullStr El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos.
title_full_unstemmed El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos.
title_sort el reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos.
title_eng The reactable: Tabletop tangible intrefaces for multihreaded musical performance.
description En años recientes se han visto una proliferación de mesas musicales, partiendo del hecho que esto no es solo una moda de mesas. Este artículo discute las razones por las cuales las interfaces de mesa son interfaces musicales promisorias; luego, se presenta el reactable, un instrumento musical basado en una interfaz de mesa que ejemplifica varios de estos logros potenciales.
description_eng Abstract In recent years we have seen a proliferation of musical tables. Believing that this is not just the result of a tabletop trend, in this paper I first discuss the reasons that make tabletop interfaces promising musical interfaces. After that, I present the reactable, a musical instrument based on a tabletop interface that exemplifies several of these potential achievements.
author Jordà, Sergi
author_facet Jordà, Sergi
topicspa_str_mv interpretación musical
reactable
interfaces tangibles
interfaces de mesa
instrumento musical
diseño
técnicas de interacción
topic interpretación musical
reactable
interfaces tangibles
interfaces de mesa
instrumento musical
diseño
técnicas de interacción
musical performance
tangible interfaces
interaction techniques
design
musical instrument
tabletop interfaces
reactable
topic_facet interpretación musical
reactable
interfaces tangibles
interfaces de mesa
instrumento musical
diseño
técnicas de interacción
musical performance
tangible interfaces
interaction techniques
design
musical instrument
tabletop interfaces
reactable
citationvolume 6
citationissue 5
citationedition Núm. 5 , Año 2009 : Enero - Diciembre 2009
publisher Universidad de Caldas
ispartofjournal Kepes
source https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/429
language Español
format Article
rights Revista Kepes - 2015
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references Puckette, M. (2002). “Max at 17er Music Journal, 26(4): (2002), 31-43. ReacTIVision. httg.upf.edu/reactable/?software [. Referenced October 20, 2006]
Pressing, J. (1990). “Cybernetic Issues in Interactive Performance Systems”. Music Journal, 14(1): (1990), 12-25
Pressing, J. (1984). “Cognitive rocesses in Improvisation”. Iin Ray Crozier and Anthony Chapman (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in the Peczier and Anthony Chapmanand, Amsterdam (1984), 345-363.
Buxton, W., Patel, S., Reevs, W., and Baecker, R. (1982). “Object and the Design of Timbral Resources”. Computer Music Journal, 982), 32-44.
Bischoff, J., Gold, R. and Horton, J. (1978). “Music for an interactive Network of Computers”. Computer Music Journal, 2(3), 24-29.
Bencina, R., Kaltenbrunner, M. and Jordà, S. (2005). “Improved Topological Fiducial Tracking in the reacTIVision System”. Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Projector-Camera Syste5).
____. (2002). “Improvising with Computers: A personal Survey (1989-2001)” Journal of New Music R1(1): (2002), 1-10.
Turner, T. (2003). The Resonance of the Cubicle: Laptop Performance in Post-digital Musicporary Music Review, 22(4): (2003). 81-92.
Bencina, R. and Kaltenbrunner, M. (2005). “The Design and Evolution of Fiducials for the reacTIVision System”. Proc. 3rd International Conference on Generative Systems in the Electronic Ar5).
Shen, C., Lesh, N. and Vernier, F. (2003). “Personal Digital Historian: Story Sharing Around th In Interactions, 0(2): (2003), 15-22. SmallFish.: http/hosting. zkm.de/wmuench/small_fish, [Referenced October 20, 2006].
Ullmer B. and Ishii, H. (2001). “Emerging Frameworks for Tangible User Interfaces”. In John M. Carroll (Ed.), Human-Computer Interactio (pp. 579-601). rroll, Addison-Wesley (2001), 579-601.
Cutler, M., Robair, G. and Bean. (2000). “Outer Limits”. Electronic Musician Magazine, (2000, 49-72.
Mazalek, A. (2005). Media Tables: An extensible method for developing multi-user media interaction platforms for sharedspaces. PhD. Dissertation., Massachusetitute of Technology (2005).
Kaltenbrunner, M. http://ww.iua.upf.emtg/reactable/ ?related [.Referenced October 20, 2006].
Kaltenbrunner, M., Geiger, G. and Jordà, S. (2004). “Dynamic Patches for Live Musical Performance”. Proc. International Conference on New Interfaces for Musiression (NIME-04), (2004) 19-22.
Jordà, S. (2005). Digital Lutherie: Crafting musical computers for new musics performance and improvisatin. PhD. Dissertation., Universitat Pabra, Barcelona.
Jordà, S., Kaltenbrunner, M., Geiger, G. and Bencina, R. The reactable*. Proc.International Computer Music Conference (2005)
Ullmer, B. (2002). Tangible Interfaces for Manipulating Aggregates of Digtal Information. Ph.D. Dissertation., usetts Institute of Technology (2002).
_____. (2002). “FMOL: Toward User-Friendly, Sophisticated New Musical Instruments”. Computer Musi, 26(3): (2002), 23-39.
Jordà, S. (1999). “Faust Music On Line (FMOL): An approach to Real-time Collective Composition on the Internet”. Leonardo Musl, 9: (1999). 5-12.
Patten, J., Ishii, H., Hnes, J., Pangaro, G. (2001)., “Sensetable: A Wireless Object Tracking Platform for Tangible User Ies”. Proc. ACM CHI ‘01 (2001), 253-260.
Hornecker, E. and Buur, J. (2006). “Getting a Grip on Tangible Interaction: A Framework on Physical Space and Social Interaction”. PI 2006 (2006), 437-446. Ishii, H and Ullmer, B. (1997). “Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bitsd Atoms”. InCHI 97 (1997), 22-27.
Gaver, W.W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellerson, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., Steed, A., Villars, N. and Walker, B. (2004). “The drift table: designing for ludic engagement”. Proc CHI ‘04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing syste Press(2004), 885-–900.
Fitts, P. M. and Posner, M. I. (1967). Human Performance. Belmont, CAs/ Cole (1967).
Fitts, P. M. (1951). “Engineering Psychology and Equipment Design”. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology (pp. 17-1340). i1287-1340.
_______. (2003) Sonigraphical Instruments: From FMOL to the reactable*. Proc. International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 70-76.
Chadabe, J. (1975). “The Voltage-controlled synthesizer”. In John Applton (Eed.), The development and practice of electronic music. New Jersey: Prentl (1975). Chomsky, N. (1956). “Three models for the description of lnguage””. IRE Transactions on Information hor(1956), 113-124.
Buxton, W. (1997). “Artists and the art of the luthiers”. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 3997, 10-–11.
_______. (2006). “Interaction Techniques for Musical Performance with Tatop Tangible Interfaces”. In ACE 2006 Advances in Computer EntertaHollywood, California, (2006).
Vertegaal, R. and Eaglestone, B. (1996). “Comparison of input devices in an ISEE direct timbre manipulation tasacting with Computers, 8(1): (1996), 13-30. Wanderley, M. M. (2001). Performer-Instrument Interaction: Applications toGestural Control of Music. Ph.D thesis., Uni Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI (2001).
Wilson, A.D. (2005). “PlayAnywhere: a compact interactive tbletop projectionvision system”. Proc. 18th annual ACM symposium on User inter software and ogy, ew York, NY, USA, ACM Press (2005), 83-–92.
Blaine, T. and Perkis, T. (2000). “Jam-O-Drum, A Study Interaction Design”. Proc. ACM DIS 2000 Conference. NY: ACM(2000).
Patten, J., Reht, B. and Ishii, H. (2002)., “Audiopad: A Tag-based Interface for Musical Performance”. Proc. Conference on New Intfor Musical Expression (2002), 24-26.
Moog, R. (2004). Keynote speech at the Conference on New Interor Musical Expression (2004).
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2009-01-01
date_accessioned 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/429
url_doi https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/429
issn 1794-7111
eissn 2462-8115
citationstartpage 201
citationendpage 223
url2_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/429/354
_version_ 1823378331004829696