Titulo:
El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos.
.
Sumario:
En años recientes se han visto una proliferación de mesas musicales, partiendo del hecho que esto no es solo una moda de mesas. Este artículo discute las razones por las cuales las interfaces de mesa son interfaces musicales promisorias; luego, se presenta el reactable, un instrumento musical basado en una interfaz de mesa que ejemplifica varios de estos logros potenciales.
Guardado en:
1794-7111
2462-8115
6
2009-01-01
201
223
Revista Kepes - 2015
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id |
oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article-429 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos. interpretación musical Puckette, M. (2002). “Max at 17er Music Journal, 26(4): (2002), 31-43. ReacTIVision. httg.upf.edu/reactable/?software [. Referenced October 20, 2006] Pressing, J. (1990). “Cybernetic Issues in Interactive Performance Systems”. Music Journal, 14(1): (1990), 12-25 Pressing, J. (1984). “Cognitive rocesses in Improvisation”. Iin Ray Crozier and Anthony Chapman (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in the Peczier and Anthony Chapmanand, Amsterdam (1984), 345-363. Buxton, W., Patel, S., Reevs, W., and Baecker, R. (1982). “Object and the Design of Timbral Resources”. Computer Music Journal, 982), 32-44. Bischoff, J., Gold, R. and Horton, J. (1978). “Music for an interactive Network of Computers”. Computer Music Journal, 2(3), 24-29. Bencina, R., Kaltenbrunner, M. and Jordà, S. (2005). “Improved Topological Fiducial Tracking in the reacTIVision System”. Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Projector-Camera Syste5). ____. (2002). “Improvising with Computers: A personal Survey (1989-2001)” Journal of New Music R1(1): (2002), 1-10. En años recientes se han visto una proliferación de mesas musicales, partiendo del hecho que esto no es solo una moda de mesas. Este artículo discute las razones por las cuales las interfaces de mesa son interfaces musicales promisorias; luego, se presenta el reactable, un instrumento musical basado en una interfaz de mesa que ejemplifica varios de estos logros potenciales. Jordà, Sergi reactable interfaces tangibles interfaces de mesa instrumento musical diseño Turner, T. (2003). The Resonance of the Cubicle: Laptop Performance in Post-digital Musicporary Music Review, 22(4): (2003). 81-92. técnicas de interacción 6 Núm. 5 , Año 2009 : Enero - Diciembre 2009 5 application/pdf https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/429 Bencina, R. and Kaltenbrunner, M. (2005). “The Design and Evolution of Fiducials for the reacTIVision System”. Proc. 3rd International Conference on Generative Systems in the Electronic Ar5). Revista Kepes - 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Español Publication Kepes Universidad de Caldas Shen, C., Lesh, N. and Vernier, F. (2003). “Personal Digital Historian: Story Sharing Around th In Interactions, 0(2): (2003), 15-22. SmallFish.: http/hosting. zkm.de/wmuench/small_fish, [Referenced October 20, 2006]. Artículo de revista Ullmer B. and Ishii, H. (2001). “Emerging Frameworks for Tangible User Interfaces”. In John M. Carroll (Ed.), Human-Computer Interactio (pp. 579-601). rroll, Addison-Wesley (2001), 579-601. Cutler, M., Robair, G. and Bean. (2000). “Outer Limits”. Electronic Musician Magazine, (2000, 49-72. Mazalek, A. (2005). Media Tables: An extensible method for developing multi-user media interaction platforms for sharedspaces. PhD. Dissertation., Massachusetitute of Technology (2005). Kaltenbrunner, M. http://ww.iua.upf.emtg/reactable/ ?related [.Referenced October 20, 2006]. Kaltenbrunner, M., Geiger, G. and Jordà, S. (2004). “Dynamic Patches for Live Musical Performance”. Proc. International Conference on New Interfaces for Musiression (NIME-04), (2004) 19-22. Jordà, S. (2005). Digital Lutherie: Crafting musical computers for new musics performance and improvisatin. PhD. Dissertation., Universitat Pabra, Barcelona. Jordà, S., Kaltenbrunner, M., Geiger, G. and Bencina, R. The reactable*. Proc.International Computer Music Conference (2005) Ullmer, B. (2002). Tangible Interfaces for Manipulating Aggregates of Digtal Information. Ph.D. Dissertation., usetts Institute of Technology (2002). _____. (2002). “FMOL: Toward User-Friendly, Sophisticated New Musical Instruments”. Computer Musi, 26(3): (2002), 23-39. Jordà, S. (1999). “Faust Music On Line (FMOL): An approach to Real-time Collective Composition on the Internet”. Leonardo Musl, 9: (1999). 5-12. Patten, J., Ishii, H., Hnes, J., Pangaro, G. (2001)., “Sensetable: A Wireless Object Tracking Platform for Tangible User Ies”. Proc. ACM CHI ‘01 (2001), 253-260. Hornecker, E. and Buur, J. (2006). “Getting a Grip on Tangible Interaction: A Framework on Physical Space and Social Interaction”. PI 2006 (2006), 437-446. Ishii, H and Ullmer, B. (1997). “Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bitsd Atoms”. InCHI 97 (1997), 22-27. Gaver, W.W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellerson, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., Steed, A., Villars, N. and Walker, B. (2004). “The drift table: designing for ludic engagement”. Proc CHI ‘04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing syste Press(2004), 885-–900. Fitts, P. M. and Posner, M. I. (1967). Human Performance. Belmont, CAs/ Cole (1967). Fitts, P. M. (1951). “Engineering Psychology and Equipment Design”. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology (pp. 17-1340). i1287-1340. _______. (2003) Sonigraphical Instruments: From FMOL to the reactable*. Proc. International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 70-76. Chadabe, J. (1975). “The Voltage-controlled synthesizer”. In John Applton (Eed.), The development and practice of electronic music. New Jersey: Prentl (1975). Chomsky, N. (1956). “Three models for the description of lnguage””. IRE Transactions on Information hor(1956), 113-124. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Buxton, W. (1997). “Artists and the art of the luthiers”. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 3997, 10-–11. _______. (2006). “Interaction Techniques for Musical Performance with Tatop Tangible Interfaces”. In ACE 2006 Advances in Computer EntertaHollywood, California, (2006). Vertegaal, R. and Eaglestone, B. (1996). “Comparison of input devices in an ISEE direct timbre manipulation tasacting with Computers, 8(1): (1996), 13-30. Wanderley, M. M. (2001). Performer-Instrument Interaction: Applications toGestural Control of Music. Ph.D thesis., Uni Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI (2001). info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Wilson, A.D. (2005). “PlayAnywhere: a compact interactive tbletop projectionvision system”. Proc. 18th annual ACM symposium on User inter software and ogy, ew York, NY, USA, ACM Press (2005), 83-–92. Blaine, T. and Perkis, T. (2000). “Jam-O-Drum, A Study Interaction Design”. Proc. ACM DIS 2000 Conference. NY: ACM(2000). Patten, J., Reht, B. and Ishii, H. (2002)., “Audiopad: A Tag-based Interface for Musical Performance”. Proc. Conference on New Intfor Musical Expression (2002), 24-26. Moog, R. (2004). Keynote speech at the Conference on New Interor Musical Expression (2004). musical performance tangible interfaces interaction techniques design Journal article musical instrument tabletop interfaces The reactable: Tabletop tangible intrefaces for multihreaded musical performance. Abstract In recent years we have seen a proliferation of musical tables. Believing that this is not just the result of a tabletop trend, in this paper I first discuss the reasons that make tabletop interfaces promising musical interfaces. After that, I present the reactable, a musical instrument based on a tabletop interface that exemplifies several of these potential achievements. reactable 2009-01-01 2462-8115 1794-7111 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/429 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/429/354 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z 201 223 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z |
institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS |
thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png |
country_str |
Colombia |
collection |
Kepes |
title |
El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos. |
spellingShingle |
El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos. Jordà, Sergi interpretación musical reactable interfaces tangibles interfaces de mesa instrumento musical diseño técnicas de interacción musical performance tangible interfaces interaction techniques design musical instrument tabletop interfaces reactable |
title_short |
El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos. |
title_full |
El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos. |
title_fullStr |
El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos. |
title_full_unstemmed |
El reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos. |
title_sort |
el reactable: interfaz tangible de mesa para interpretación musical multihilos. |
title_eng |
The reactable: Tabletop tangible intrefaces for multihreaded musical performance. |
description |
En años recientes se han visto una proliferación de mesas musicales, partiendo del hecho que esto no es solo una moda de mesas. Este artículo discute las razones por las cuales las interfaces de mesa son interfaces musicales promisorias; luego, se presenta el reactable, un instrumento musical basado en una interfaz de mesa que ejemplifica varios de estos logros potenciales.
|
description_eng |
Abstract
In recent years we have seen a proliferation of musical tables. Believing that this is not just the result of a tabletop trend, in this paper I first discuss the reasons that make tabletop interfaces promising musical interfaces. After that, I present the reactable, a musical instrument based on a tabletop interface that exemplifies several of these potential achievements.
|
author |
Jordà, Sergi |
author_facet |
Jordà, Sergi |
topicspa_str_mv |
interpretación musical reactable interfaces tangibles interfaces de mesa instrumento musical diseño técnicas de interacción |
topic |
interpretación musical reactable interfaces tangibles interfaces de mesa instrumento musical diseño técnicas de interacción musical performance tangible interfaces interaction techniques design musical instrument tabletop interfaces reactable |
topic_facet |
interpretación musical reactable interfaces tangibles interfaces de mesa instrumento musical diseño técnicas de interacción musical performance tangible interfaces interaction techniques design musical instrument tabletop interfaces reactable |
citationvolume |
6 |
citationissue |
5 |
citationedition |
Núm. 5 , Año 2009 : Enero - Diciembre 2009 |
publisher |
Universidad de Caldas |
ispartofjournal |
Kepes |
source |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/429 |
language |
Español |
format |
Article |
rights |
Revista Kepes - 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
references |
Puckette, M. (2002). “Max at 17er Music Journal, 26(4): (2002), 31-43. ReacTIVision. httg.upf.edu/reactable/?software [. Referenced October 20, 2006] Pressing, J. (1990). “Cybernetic Issues in Interactive Performance Systems”. Music Journal, 14(1): (1990), 12-25 Pressing, J. (1984). “Cognitive rocesses in Improvisation”. Iin Ray Crozier and Anthony Chapman (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in the Peczier and Anthony Chapmanand, Amsterdam (1984), 345-363. Buxton, W., Patel, S., Reevs, W., and Baecker, R. (1982). “Object and the Design of Timbral Resources”. Computer Music Journal, 982), 32-44. Bischoff, J., Gold, R. and Horton, J. (1978). “Music for an interactive Network of Computers”. Computer Music Journal, 2(3), 24-29. Bencina, R., Kaltenbrunner, M. and Jordà, S. (2005). “Improved Topological Fiducial Tracking in the reacTIVision System”. Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Projector-Camera Syste5). ____. (2002). “Improvising with Computers: A personal Survey (1989-2001)” Journal of New Music R1(1): (2002), 1-10. Turner, T. (2003). The Resonance of the Cubicle: Laptop Performance in Post-digital Musicporary Music Review, 22(4): (2003). 81-92. Bencina, R. and Kaltenbrunner, M. (2005). “The Design and Evolution of Fiducials for the reacTIVision System”. Proc. 3rd International Conference on Generative Systems in the Electronic Ar5). Shen, C., Lesh, N. and Vernier, F. (2003). “Personal Digital Historian: Story Sharing Around th In Interactions, 0(2): (2003), 15-22. SmallFish.: http/hosting. zkm.de/wmuench/small_fish, [Referenced October 20, 2006]. Ullmer B. and Ishii, H. (2001). “Emerging Frameworks for Tangible User Interfaces”. In John M. Carroll (Ed.), Human-Computer Interactio (pp. 579-601). rroll, Addison-Wesley (2001), 579-601. Cutler, M., Robair, G. and Bean. (2000). “Outer Limits”. Electronic Musician Magazine, (2000, 49-72. Mazalek, A. (2005). Media Tables: An extensible method for developing multi-user media interaction platforms for sharedspaces. PhD. Dissertation., Massachusetitute of Technology (2005). Kaltenbrunner, M. http://ww.iua.upf.emtg/reactable/ ?related [.Referenced October 20, 2006]. Kaltenbrunner, M., Geiger, G. and Jordà, S. (2004). “Dynamic Patches for Live Musical Performance”. Proc. International Conference on New Interfaces for Musiression (NIME-04), (2004) 19-22. Jordà, S. (2005). Digital Lutherie: Crafting musical computers for new musics performance and improvisatin. PhD. Dissertation., Universitat Pabra, Barcelona. Jordà, S., Kaltenbrunner, M., Geiger, G. and Bencina, R. The reactable*. Proc.International Computer Music Conference (2005) Ullmer, B. (2002). Tangible Interfaces for Manipulating Aggregates of Digtal Information. Ph.D. Dissertation., usetts Institute of Technology (2002). _____. (2002). “FMOL: Toward User-Friendly, Sophisticated New Musical Instruments”. Computer Musi, 26(3): (2002), 23-39. Jordà, S. (1999). “Faust Music On Line (FMOL): An approach to Real-time Collective Composition on the Internet”. Leonardo Musl, 9: (1999). 5-12. Patten, J., Ishii, H., Hnes, J., Pangaro, G. (2001)., “Sensetable: A Wireless Object Tracking Platform for Tangible User Ies”. Proc. ACM CHI ‘01 (2001), 253-260. Hornecker, E. and Buur, J. (2006). “Getting a Grip on Tangible Interaction: A Framework on Physical Space and Social Interaction”. PI 2006 (2006), 437-446. Ishii, H and Ullmer, B. (1997). “Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bitsd Atoms”. InCHI 97 (1997), 22-27. Gaver, W.W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellerson, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., Steed, A., Villars, N. and Walker, B. (2004). “The drift table: designing for ludic engagement”. Proc CHI ‘04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing syste Press(2004), 885-–900. Fitts, P. M. and Posner, M. I. (1967). Human Performance. Belmont, CAs/ Cole (1967). Fitts, P. M. (1951). “Engineering Psychology and Equipment Design”. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology (pp. 17-1340). i1287-1340. _______. (2003) Sonigraphical Instruments: From FMOL to the reactable*. Proc. International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 70-76. Chadabe, J. (1975). “The Voltage-controlled synthesizer”. In John Applton (Eed.), The development and practice of electronic music. New Jersey: Prentl (1975). Chomsky, N. (1956). “Three models for the description of lnguage””. IRE Transactions on Information hor(1956), 113-124. Buxton, W. (1997). “Artists and the art of the luthiers”. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 3997, 10-–11. _______. (2006). “Interaction Techniques for Musical Performance with Tatop Tangible Interfaces”. In ACE 2006 Advances in Computer EntertaHollywood, California, (2006). Vertegaal, R. and Eaglestone, B. (1996). “Comparison of input devices in an ISEE direct timbre manipulation tasacting with Computers, 8(1): (1996), 13-30. Wanderley, M. M. (2001). Performer-Instrument Interaction: Applications toGestural Control of Music. Ph.D thesis., Uni Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI (2001). Wilson, A.D. (2005). “PlayAnywhere: a compact interactive tbletop projectionvision system”. Proc. 18th annual ACM symposium on User inter software and ogy, ew York, NY, USA, ACM Press (2005), 83-–92. Blaine, T. and Perkis, T. (2000). “Jam-O-Drum, A Study Interaction Design”. Proc. ACM DIS 2000 Conference. NY: ACM(2000). Patten, J., Reht, B. and Ishii, H. (2002)., “Audiopad: A Tag-based Interface for Musical Performance”. Proc. Conference on New Intfor Musical Expression (2002), 24-26. Moog, R. (2004). Keynote speech at the Conference on New Interor Musical Expression (2004). |
type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
type_content |
Text |
publishDate |
2009-01-01 |
date_accessioned |
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z |
date_available |
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z |
url |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/429 |
url_doi |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/429 |
issn |
1794-7111 |
eissn |
2462-8115 |
citationstartpage |
201 |
citationendpage |
223 |
url2_str_mv |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/429/354 |
_version_ |
1823378331004829696 |