Vacíos en la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental: una revisión de las corrientes de la filosofía ambiental
Titulo:

Vacíos en la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental: una revisión de las corrientes de la filosofía ambiental
.

Sumario:

El presente artículo es un producto preliminar del proyecto de investigación “Una propuesta de lineamientos para la formación ambiental en la educación superior colombiana”, adelantado con la Universidad Antonio Nariño durante los años 2011 y 2012. Son dos los objetivos que se persiguen: por un lado, demostrar el vacío de la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental; y por otro lado, mostrar que a pesar de que las reflexiones epistemológicas sobre filosofía ambiental son pobres, la literatura sobre corrientes de la filosofía ambiental es prolífica. De manera que el orden de la exposición recurre, prime... Ver más

Guardado en:

Luna Azul

0122-5391

1909-2474

Baquero, Sergio Ángel

UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS

2013-01-01

213

246

Colombia

ecofeminismo

biorregionalismo

biología de la conservación

Ecología profunda

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Luna Azul - 2015

id oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article-1666
record_format ojs
spelling Vacíos en la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental: una revisión de las corrientes de la filosofía ambiental
 Markus, T. (2003a). More-than-human-world. Deep ecology as environmental philosophy. Socijalna Ekologija, 12(3-4), 143-163.
 Parkin, J. (1992). A philosophy for multiattribute evaluation in environmental impact assessments. Geoforum, 23(4), 467-475.
 Park, C. D. (1984). Towards a philosophy of environmental education. Environmental Education & Information, 3(1), 3-15.
 ________.(2000). Environmental history, philosophy and difference. Journal of Historical Geography, 26(1), 23-27.
 Nash, C. (1999). Environmental history, philosophy and difference: Feminist perspectives on historical and contemporary human-environmental relations. Documents d’Analisi Geografica, (35), 61-72.
 ________. (2004). Ecology and biology: Environmental implications of contemporary biological theories. Socijalna Ekologija, 13(2), 129-151.
 ________. (2003d). More-than-human-world. Deep ecology as environmental philosophy. Socijalna Ekologija, 12(3-4), 143-163.
 ________. (2003c). More-than-human-world. Deep ecology as environmental philosophy. Socijalna Ekologija, 12(3-4), 143-163.
 ________. (2003b). "A head into nowhere". Lewis Mumford and the ecological criticism of technological civilization. Socijalna Ekologija, 12(1-2), 27-45.
 Macauley, D. (2005). The flowering of environmental roots and the four elements in Presocratic philosophy: From Empedocles to Deleuze and Guattari. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 9(3), 281-314.
 Plumwood, V. (1999). The struggle for environmental philosophy in Australia. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 3(2), 157-178.
 Luck, G. W.; Rickettst, T. H.; Daily, G. C. y Imhoff, M. (2004). Alleviating spatial conflict between people and biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(1), 182-186.
 Lübbe-Wolff, G. (2001). Efficient environmental legislation - On different philosophies of pollution control in Europe. Journal of Environmental Law, 13(1), 75-86.
 Light, A. (2002). Contemporary environmental ethics from Metaethics to public philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 33(4), 427-449.
 ________. (2011). The evolution of environmental management philosophy under rapid economic development in China. Ambio, 40(1), 88-92.
 Li, P.; Huang, Z.; Ren, H.; Liu, H. y Wang, Q. (2010). The Evolution of Environmental Management Philosophy Under Rapid Economic Development in China.
 Kennet, M. (2007). Editorial: Progress in Green Economics: Ontology, concepts and philosophy.Civilisation and the lost factor of reality in social and environmental justice. International Journal of GreenEconomics, 1(3-4), 225-249.
 Kark, S.; Levin, N.; Grantham, H. S. y Possingham, H. P.(2009). Between-country collaboration and consideration of costs increase conservation planning efficiency in the Mediterranean Basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 106(36), 15368-15373.
 James, G. A. (1998). The construction of India in some recent environmental philosophy. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 2(1), 3-20.
 Inhaber, H. (1975). Philosophy and limitations ofenvironmental indices. Social Indicators Research, 2(1),39-51.
 Pfister, L. F. (2007). Environmental ethics and some probing questions for traditional Chinese philosophy. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 34(Suppl.), 101-123.
 Salleh, A. (1996). Social ecology and "the man question". Environmental Politics, 5(2), 258-273.
 Hotam, Y. (2010). Ecology and Pedagogy: On the educational implications of postwar environmental philosophy. Policy Futures in Education, 8(3-4), 478- 487.
 Walter, P. (2009). Philosophies of adult environmental education. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(1), 3-25.
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
 Wilson, K. A.; McBride, M. F.; Bode, M. y Possingham, H.P. (2006). Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature, 440(7082), 337-340.
 Utsler, D. (2009). Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutics as a model for environmental philosophy. Philosophy Today, 53(2), 173-178.
 ________. (2003). Ecofeminism as sociology. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 14(1), 61-74.
 Tyburski, W. (2008). Origin and development of ecological philosophy and environmental ethics and their impact on the idea of sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 16(2), 100-108.
 Thompson, P. B. y Whyte, K. P. (2011). What Happens to Environmental Philosophy in a Wicked World? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Forthcoming.
 ________. (2001b). Earth and nature-based spirituality (Part II): From earth first! and bioregionalism to scientific paganism and the new age. Religion, 31(3), 225-245.
 ________. (2001a). Earth and nature-based spirituality (Part I): From deep ecology to radical environmentalism. Religion, 31(2), 175-193.
 Taylor, B. (1997). Earthen spirituality or cultural genocide? Radical environmentalism’s appropriation of Native American spirituality. Religion, 27(2), 183-215.
 Sekercioglu, Ç. H.; Ehrlich, P. R.; Daily, G. C.; Aygen, D.; Goehring, D. y Sandí, R. F. (2002). Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(1), 263-267.
 Scott, D. (2004). Transforming the "Market-Model University": Environmental philosophy, citizenship and the recovery of the humanities. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 8(2-3), 162-184.
 Schultz, J. R.; Simpson, S. y Elfessi, A. M. (2011). The environmental action and philosophy matrix: An exploratory study of the environmental attitudes ofrecreation management and environmental studies students. Journal of Environmental Education, 42(2),98-108.
 ________. (2009). The dystopia of technoscience: Anecofeminist critique of postmodern reason. Futures,41(4), 201-209.
 Howarth, R. B. (2007). Adaptive management and the philosophy of environmental policy. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50(3), 453-458.
 Gray, R. (2007). Practical bioregionalism: A philosophy for a sustainable future and a hypothetical transition strategy for Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.Futures, 39(7), 790-806.
 Goralnik, L. y Nelson, M. P. (2011). Framing a philosophy of environmental action: Aldo Leopold, John Muir, and the importance of community. Journal of Environmental Education, 42(3), 181-192.
Núm. 36 , Año 2013 : Enero - Junio
Español
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/view/1666
Luna Azul
Universidad de Caldas
application/pdf
Artículo de revista
36
Luna Azul - 2015
ecofeminismo
biorregionalismo
biología de la conservación
Ecología profunda
Baquero, Sergio Ángel
El presente artículo es un producto preliminar del proyecto de investigación “Una propuesta de lineamientos para la formación ambiental en la educación superior colombiana”, adelantado con la Universidad Antonio Nariño durante los años 2011 y 2012. Son dos los objetivos que se persiguen: por un lado, demostrar el vacío de la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental; y por otro lado, mostrar que a pesar de que las reflexiones epistemológicas sobre filosofía ambiental son pobres, la literatura sobre corrientes de la filosofía ambiental es prolífica. De manera que el orden de la exposición recurre, primero, a una revisión de la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental; segundo, a una revisión de la literatura sobre filosofía ambiental; y tercero, a un análisis de las principales corrientes, a saber, la ecología profunda, la biología de la conservación, el biorregionalismo y el ecofeminismo.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Publication
 De Laplante, K. (2004). Can you teach environmental philosophy without being an environmentalist? Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 8(2-3),198-212.
 Chan, K. M. A. y Daily, G. C. (2008). The payoff of conservation investments in tropical countryside.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(49), 19342-19347.
 Elias, J. y Merriam, S. (1995). Philosophical foundations of adult education (2nd ed.). Malabar FL: Kreiger.
 Galić, B. y Geiger, M. (2007). From domination logic toward ethics of care - Conceptual foundations of ecofeminism. Socijalna Ekologija, 16(1), 17-33.
 Corcoran, P. y Sievers, E. (1994). Reconceptualizing environmental education: five possibilities. Journal of Environmental Education, 25, 4-8. doi:10.1080/00958964.1994.9941958
 Geiger, M. (2002). Spiritual aspects of ecofeminism. Socijalna Ekologija, 11(1-2), 15-27.
 Geiger, M. y Zeman, Z. (2010). Place of living and integral sustainability - Vitality of local in a globalized world. Drustvena Istrazivanja, 19(3), 377-400.
 Evanoff, R. (2007). Bioregionalism and cross-cultural dialogue on a land ethic. Ethics, Place and Environment, 10(2), 141-156.
 Gold, J. R.; Revill, G. y Haigh, M. J. (1996). Interpreting the dust bowl: Teaching environmental philosophy through film. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(2), 209-221.
 Chadès, I.; McDonald-Madden, E.; McCarthy, M. A.; Wintle, B.; Linkie, M. y Possingham, H. P. (2008). When to stop managing or surveying cryptic threatened species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(37), 13936-13940.
 Bode, M.; Wilson, K. A.; Brooks, T. M.; Turner, W. R.; Mittermeier, R. A.; McBride, M. F.; Underwood, E. C. etal. (2008). Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(17), 6498-6501.
 Armsworth, P. R.; Daily, G. C.; Kareiva, P. y Sanchirico, J. N. (2006). Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(14), 5403-5408.
 Gómez, M. y De Puig, I. (2003). Ecodiálogo, Environmental Education and Philosophical Dialogue.The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 16(4), 37-40.
 Anthony, R. (2010). Building a Sustainable Future for Animal Agriculture: An Environmental Virtue Ethic of Care Approach within the Philosophy of Technology. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25(2),123-144.
Gaps in the literature on the philosophy of environmental education: a review of the currents of environmental philosophy
Abstract This article is a preliminary product of the research project “A proposal of guidelines for environmental training in Colombian Higher Education” carried out with Universidad Antonio Nariño during the years 2011and 2012. There are two objectives to be achieved: to demonstrate the void of literature on environmental education philosophy and to show that, despite the epistemological reflections on environmental philosophy are poor, the literature on trends in environmental philosophy is prolific. Thus, the order of the presentation is, first, a literature review on environmental education philosophy;, secondly, a literature review on environmental philosophy; and in third place, an analysis of the main trends, namely, deep ecology, conservation biology, bioregionalism and ecofeminism.
Journal article
ecofeminism
bioregionalism
conservation biology
Deep ecology
213
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/download/1666/1583
246
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
2013-01-01
1909-2474
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/view/1666
0122-5391
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Luna Azul
title Vacíos en la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental: una revisión de las corrientes de la filosofía ambiental
spellingShingle Vacíos en la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental: una revisión de las corrientes de la filosofía ambiental
Baquero, Sergio Ángel
ecofeminismo
biorregionalismo
biología de la conservación
Ecología profunda
ecofeminism
bioregionalism
conservation biology
Deep ecology
title_short Vacíos en la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental: una revisión de las corrientes de la filosofía ambiental
title_full Vacíos en la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental: una revisión de las corrientes de la filosofía ambiental
title_fullStr Vacíos en la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental: una revisión de las corrientes de la filosofía ambiental
title_full_unstemmed Vacíos en la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental: una revisión de las corrientes de la filosofía ambiental
title_sort vacíos en la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental: una revisión de las corrientes de la filosofía ambiental
title_eng Gaps in the literature on the philosophy of environmental education: a review of the currents of environmental philosophy
description El presente artículo es un producto preliminar del proyecto de investigación “Una propuesta de lineamientos para la formación ambiental en la educación superior colombiana”, adelantado con la Universidad Antonio Nariño durante los años 2011 y 2012. Son dos los objetivos que se persiguen: por un lado, demostrar el vacío de la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental; y por otro lado, mostrar que a pesar de que las reflexiones epistemológicas sobre filosofía ambiental son pobres, la literatura sobre corrientes de la filosofía ambiental es prolífica. De manera que el orden de la exposición recurre, primero, a una revisión de la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental; segundo, a una revisión de la literatura sobre filosofía ambiental; y tercero, a un análisis de las principales corrientes, a saber, la ecología profunda, la biología de la conservación, el biorregionalismo y el ecofeminismo.
description_eng Abstract This article is a preliminary product of the research project “A proposal of guidelines for environmental training in Colombian Higher Education” carried out with Universidad Antonio Nariño during the years 2011and 2012. There are two objectives to be achieved: to demonstrate the void of literature on environmental education philosophy and to show that, despite the epistemological reflections on environmental philosophy are poor, the literature on trends in environmental philosophy is prolific. Thus, the order of the presentation is, first, a literature review on environmental education philosophy;, secondly, a literature review on environmental philosophy; and in third place, an analysis of the main trends, namely, deep ecology, conservation biology, bioregionalism and ecofeminism.
author Baquero, Sergio Ángel
author_facet Baquero, Sergio Ángel
topicspa_str_mv ecofeminismo
biorregionalismo
biología de la conservación
Ecología profunda
topic ecofeminismo
biorregionalismo
biología de la conservación
Ecología profunda
ecofeminism
bioregionalism
conservation biology
Deep ecology
topic_facet ecofeminismo
biorregionalismo
biología de la conservación
Ecología profunda
ecofeminism
bioregionalism
conservation biology
Deep ecology
citationissue 36
citationedition Núm. 36 , Año 2013 : Enero - Junio
publisher Universidad de Caldas
ispartofjournal Luna Azul
source https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/view/1666
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Luna Azul - 2015
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
references  Markus, T. (2003a). More-than-human-world. Deep ecology as environmental philosophy. Socijalna Ekologija, 12(3-4), 143-163.
 Parkin, J. (1992). A philosophy for multiattribute evaluation in environmental impact assessments. Geoforum, 23(4), 467-475.
 Park, C. D. (1984). Towards a philosophy of environmental education. Environmental Education & Information, 3(1), 3-15.
 ________.(2000). Environmental history, philosophy and difference. Journal of Historical Geography, 26(1), 23-27.
 Nash, C. (1999). Environmental history, philosophy and difference: Feminist perspectives on historical and contemporary human-environmental relations. Documents d’Analisi Geografica, (35), 61-72.
 ________. (2004). Ecology and biology: Environmental implications of contemporary biological theories. Socijalna Ekologija, 13(2), 129-151.
 ________. (2003d). More-than-human-world. Deep ecology as environmental philosophy. Socijalna Ekologija, 12(3-4), 143-163.
 ________. (2003c). More-than-human-world. Deep ecology as environmental philosophy. Socijalna Ekologija, 12(3-4), 143-163.
 ________. (2003b). "A head into nowhere". Lewis Mumford and the ecological criticism of technological civilization. Socijalna Ekologija, 12(1-2), 27-45.
 Macauley, D. (2005). The flowering of environmental roots and the four elements in Presocratic philosophy: From Empedocles to Deleuze and Guattari. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 9(3), 281-314.
 Plumwood, V. (1999). The struggle for environmental philosophy in Australia. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 3(2), 157-178.
 Luck, G. W.; Rickettst, T. H.; Daily, G. C. y Imhoff, M. (2004). Alleviating spatial conflict between people and biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(1), 182-186.
 Lübbe-Wolff, G. (2001). Efficient environmental legislation - On different philosophies of pollution control in Europe. Journal of Environmental Law, 13(1), 75-86.
 Light, A. (2002). Contemporary environmental ethics from Metaethics to public philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 33(4), 427-449.
 ________. (2011). The evolution of environmental management philosophy under rapid economic development in China. Ambio, 40(1), 88-92.
 Li, P.; Huang, Z.; Ren, H.; Liu, H. y Wang, Q. (2010). The Evolution of Environmental Management Philosophy Under Rapid Economic Development in China.
 Kennet, M. (2007). Editorial: Progress in Green Economics: Ontology, concepts and philosophy.Civilisation and the lost factor of reality in social and environmental justice. International Journal of GreenEconomics, 1(3-4), 225-249.
 Kark, S.; Levin, N.; Grantham, H. S. y Possingham, H. P.(2009). Between-country collaboration and consideration of costs increase conservation planning efficiency in the Mediterranean Basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 106(36), 15368-15373.
 James, G. A. (1998). The construction of India in some recent environmental philosophy. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 2(1), 3-20.
 Inhaber, H. (1975). Philosophy and limitations ofenvironmental indices. Social Indicators Research, 2(1),39-51.
 Pfister, L. F. (2007). Environmental ethics and some probing questions for traditional Chinese philosophy. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 34(Suppl.), 101-123.
 Salleh, A. (1996). Social ecology and "the man question". Environmental Politics, 5(2), 258-273.
 Hotam, Y. (2010). Ecology and Pedagogy: On the educational implications of postwar environmental philosophy. Policy Futures in Education, 8(3-4), 478- 487.
 Walter, P. (2009). Philosophies of adult environmental education. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(1), 3-25.
 Wilson, K. A.; McBride, M. F.; Bode, M. y Possingham, H.P. (2006). Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature, 440(7082), 337-340.
 Utsler, D. (2009). Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutics as a model for environmental philosophy. Philosophy Today, 53(2), 173-178.
 ________. (2003). Ecofeminism as sociology. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 14(1), 61-74.
 Tyburski, W. (2008). Origin and development of ecological philosophy and environmental ethics and their impact on the idea of sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 16(2), 100-108.
 Thompson, P. B. y Whyte, K. P. (2011). What Happens to Environmental Philosophy in a Wicked World? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Forthcoming.
 ________. (2001b). Earth and nature-based spirituality (Part II): From earth first! and bioregionalism to scientific paganism and the new age. Religion, 31(3), 225-245.
 ________. (2001a). Earth and nature-based spirituality (Part I): From deep ecology to radical environmentalism. Religion, 31(2), 175-193.
 Taylor, B. (1997). Earthen spirituality or cultural genocide? Radical environmentalism’s appropriation of Native American spirituality. Religion, 27(2), 183-215.
 Sekercioglu, Ç. H.; Ehrlich, P. R.; Daily, G. C.; Aygen, D.; Goehring, D. y Sandí, R. F. (2002). Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(1), 263-267.
 Scott, D. (2004). Transforming the "Market-Model University": Environmental philosophy, citizenship and the recovery of the humanities. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 8(2-3), 162-184.
 Schultz, J. R.; Simpson, S. y Elfessi, A. M. (2011). The environmental action and philosophy matrix: An exploratory study of the environmental attitudes ofrecreation management and environmental studies students. Journal of Environmental Education, 42(2),98-108.
 ________. (2009). The dystopia of technoscience: Anecofeminist critique of postmodern reason. Futures,41(4), 201-209.
 Howarth, R. B. (2007). Adaptive management and the philosophy of environmental policy. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50(3), 453-458.
 Gray, R. (2007). Practical bioregionalism: A philosophy for a sustainable future and a hypothetical transition strategy for Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.Futures, 39(7), 790-806.
 Goralnik, L. y Nelson, M. P. (2011). Framing a philosophy of environmental action: Aldo Leopold, John Muir, and the importance of community. Journal of Environmental Education, 42(3), 181-192.
 De Laplante, K. (2004). Can you teach environmental philosophy without being an environmentalist? Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 8(2-3),198-212.
 Chan, K. M. A. y Daily, G. C. (2008). The payoff of conservation investments in tropical countryside.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(49), 19342-19347.
 Elias, J. y Merriam, S. (1995). Philosophical foundations of adult education (2nd ed.). Malabar FL: Kreiger.
 Galić, B. y Geiger, M. (2007). From domination logic toward ethics of care - Conceptual foundations of ecofeminism. Socijalna Ekologija, 16(1), 17-33.
 Corcoran, P. y Sievers, E. (1994). Reconceptualizing environmental education: five possibilities. Journal of Environmental Education, 25, 4-8. doi:10.1080/00958964.1994.9941958
 Geiger, M. (2002). Spiritual aspects of ecofeminism. Socijalna Ekologija, 11(1-2), 15-27.
 Geiger, M. y Zeman, Z. (2010). Place of living and integral sustainability - Vitality of local in a globalized world. Drustvena Istrazivanja, 19(3), 377-400.
 Evanoff, R. (2007). Bioregionalism and cross-cultural dialogue on a land ethic. Ethics, Place and Environment, 10(2), 141-156.
 Gold, J. R.; Revill, G. y Haigh, M. J. (1996). Interpreting the dust bowl: Teaching environmental philosophy through film. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(2), 209-221.
 Chadès, I.; McDonald-Madden, E.; McCarthy, M. A.; Wintle, B.; Linkie, M. y Possingham, H. P. (2008). When to stop managing or surveying cryptic threatened species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(37), 13936-13940.
 Bode, M.; Wilson, K. A.; Brooks, T. M.; Turner, W. R.; Mittermeier, R. A.; McBride, M. F.; Underwood, E. C. etal. (2008). Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(17), 6498-6501.
 Armsworth, P. R.; Daily, G. C.; Kareiva, P. y Sanchirico, J. N. (2006). Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(14), 5403-5408.
 Gómez, M. y De Puig, I. (2003). Ecodiálogo, Environmental Education and Philosophical Dialogue.The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 16(4), 37-40.
 Anthony, R. (2010). Building a Sustainable Future for Animal Agriculture: An Environmental Virtue Ethic of Care Approach within the Philosophy of Technology. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25(2),123-144.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2013-01-01
date_accessioned 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/view/1666
url_doi https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/view/1666
issn 0122-5391
eissn 1909-2474
citationstartpage 213
citationendpage 246
url2_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/download/1666/1583
_version_ 1833252854965469184

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares