Titulo:
Estudio sobre los aspectos filosóficos de la justicia social y la igualdad en la sociedad moderna
.
Sumario:
Este estudio está dedicado al problema apremiante de entender los fundamentos filosóficos de la justicia social y la igualdad en el contexto de los retos planteados por el mundo globalizado moderno. El propósito de este estudio es realizar un análisis comprehensivo de la evolución de los conceptos filosóficos de justicia; identificar problemas clave al asegurar oportunidades iguales y superar la discriminación, y examinar el impacto de la globalización en la desigualdad social. Para ello, se aplican métodos axiológicos y comparativos, así como análisis estructurales-funcionales, críticos y sistemáticos. A partir de un examen comparativo de las teorías de la justicia de J. Rawls, A. Sen y A. Honneth, se identifican las ventajas y limitacione... Ver más
Guardado en:
0124-6127
2462-9596
25
2024-07-01
15
47
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
| id |
oai:revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co:article-10401 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Estudio sobre los aspectos filosóficos de la justicia social y la igualdad en la sociedad moderna comunidades marginadas Discusiones Filosóficas Artículo de revista Núm. 45 , Año 2024 : Julio - Diciembre 45 25 estado social de derecho derechos humanos Universidad de Caldas grupos vulnerables Kieliszek, Zdzislaw Smetaniak, Mariia Discriminación Ihnatiev, Vitalii Kochkorova, Dinara Molla, Erjona Este estudio está dedicado al problema apremiante de entender los fundamentos filosóficos de la justicia social y la igualdad en el contexto de los retos planteados por el mundo globalizado moderno. El propósito de este estudio es realizar un análisis comprehensivo de la evolución de los conceptos filosóficos de justicia; identificar problemas clave al asegurar oportunidades iguales y superar la discriminación, y examinar el impacto de la globalización en la desigualdad social. Para ello, se aplican métodos axiológicos y comparativos, así como análisis estructurales-funcionales, críticos y sistemáticos. A partir de un examen comparativo de las teorías de la justicia de J. Rawls, A. Sen y A. Honneth, se identifican las ventajas y limitaciones conceptuales de cada una de ellas, así como la necesidad de integrar el paradigma distributivo considerando la expansión de oportunidades reales para las personas y asegurando que el reconocimiento total sea comprobado. Se expone el impacto ambivalente de la globalización en la desigualdad social y se determinaron estrategias para afrontarlo, sobre los principios de inclusividad y participación democrática. Además, se enfatiza el rol crucial de la colaboración entre el estado y la sociedad civil en el avance de los valores de la justicia social y en la implementación de sus principios en la práctica. Este estudio contribuye de forma sustancial al desarrollo de la discusión filosófica sobre la naturaleza y los principios de la justicia social, ofreciendo una revisión comprehensiva y relevante para los retos del mundo pluralista y globalizado del siglo XXI. Orazalieva, R. B., Bila, O. O., Pozdnyakova, O. L. & Derevyanko, N. V. (2020). Teacher’s use of a drawing workshop as a method of art therapy. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 8(3), 451-459.https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.23 Sarafa, O. & Oyewole, S. (2021). John Rawls on the theory of justice. In D. Abdulrahman (Ed.), Classical Theorists in the Social Sciences: From Western Ideas to African Realities (pp. 347-358). Malthouse Press Limited. http://surl.li/sqdhy Ryskaliyev, D. U., Zhapakov, S. M., Apakhayev, N., Moldakhmetova, Z., Buribayev, Y. A. & Khamzina, Z. A. (2019). Issues of gender equality in the workplace: The case study of Kazakhstan. Space and Culture, India, 7(2), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i2.450 Rodríguez García, T. (2022). Social and environmental equality, as principles of justice: Philosophical reflections. Universita Ciencia, 10(27), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6540032 Robeyns, I. (2021). The capability approach. In G. Berik & E. Kongar (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Economics (pp. 72-80). Routledge. https://n9.cl/4ashd Peterson, C. (2021). Is it not wrong, a balance which tilts, a plummet which deflects: a survey of social contract theory. In C. Peterson (Ed.), Beyond Civil Disobedience: Social Nullification and Black Citizenship (pp. 13-38). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77554-4_2 Pellegrini-Masini, G., Pirni, A. & Maran, S. (2020). Energy justice revisited: a critical review on the philosophical and political origins of equality. Energy Research & Social Science, 59, 101310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101310 Lynch, K., Kalaitzake, M. & Crean, M. (2021). Care and affective relations: social justice and sociology. The Sociological Review, 69(1), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120952744 McArthur, J. (2016). Assessment for social justice: The role of assessment in achieving social justice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 967-981. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1053429 Manimala, V. (2022). Globalization: A boon or a bane? In P. Jonkers & Y. Fu (Eds.), Crossing Boundaries: Challenges and Opportunities of Intercultural Dialogue (pp.193-204). Washington: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy. https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/files/60257060/Crossing_Boundaries._Challenges_and_Opportunities_of_Intercultural_Dialogue.pdf#page=198 Sfetcu, N. (2022). Plato, the Republic: on justice-dialectics and education. MultiMedia Publishing. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29990.19520 Kozera, T. (2022). Amartya Kumar Sen’s theory of justice in the perspective of the philosophy of law [ Doctoral thesis, University of Warszawski]. https://repozytorium.uw.edu.pl/entities/publication/d4d92103-b064-46d2-9469-780e1ee3e1ee Kjosavik, D. (2021). Sen and development as freedom. In G. Crawford & A. Abdulai (Eds.), Research Handbook on Democracy and Development (pp. 79-97). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112659.00011 Khamzina, Z., Buribayev, Y., Yermukanov, Y. & Alshurazova, A. (2020). Is it possible to achieve gender equality in Kazakhstan: Focus on employment and social protection. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 20(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229120927904 Khamzina, Z., Buribayev, Y., Almaganbetov, P., Tazhmagambet, A., Samaldykova, Z. & Apakhayev, N. (2020). Labor disputes in Kazakhstan: Results of legal regulation and future prospects. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 23(1), 1-14. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Labor-Disputes-in-Kazakhstan%3A-Results-of-Legal-and-Khamzina-Buribayev/6706ccd7d6869e013422dca0cf47dfe13067de20 Hutton, M. & Heath, T. (2020). Researching on the edge: Emancipatory praxis for social justice. European Journal of Marketing, 54(11), 2697-2721. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0150 Haghighat, S. (2020). Communitarianism between text and context. The Journal of Human Rights, 15(2), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.22096/hr.2020.139365.1257 Schmitz, V. (2021). Recognition and critical theory: Axel Honneth’s contributions to the Frankfurt school. [Doctoral thesis, Indiana University]. https://search.proquest.com/openview/c9bf81ec239c2c4ed28f3c5d67619ae6/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y Stübinger, E. (2023). Alternative economic approaches and the question of justice. Kohlhammer Publishers. https://doi.org/10.17433/978-3-17-043133-1 Shahzad, A. (2021). Robert Nozick’s libertarian framework of distributive/economic justice: A critical assessment of its prospects for providing global distributive justice. Pakistan Business Review, 22(4), 645-666. http://surl.li/sqdiq Zygmunt, A. (2007). Gender equality in employment and occupation in theory and practice in EU countries and Poland. University of Silesia. https://fbc.pionier.net.pl/id/oai:www.sbc.org.pl:4438 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article Weale, A. (2023). Equality and social policy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003369127 Smanova, A. B., Otynshiyeva, A. A., Saktaganova, I. S., Assanova, S., Lazim, A. M. & Beaver, K. M. (2024). Factors Associated with Achieving the Desired Level of Education in a Longitudinal and Nationally Representative Sample. Youth and Society. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0044118X241296114 Wade, R. (2004). Is globalization reducing poverty and inequality? World Development, 32(4), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.007 Ülgen, S. (2022). Rewiring globalization. Introduction. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/RewiringGlobalization_final_Revised1.pdf Gomes, M. & Gonçalves, A. (2021). The contribution of the theory of justice in John Rawls to sustainable development. Cadernos de Dereito Actual, 15, 56-71. https://www.cadernosdedereitoactual.es/index.php/cadernos/article/view/616 Turkebayeva, K., Bekturganova, M., Sabden, O., Dauliyeva, G. & Kenzhegulova, G. (2022). Assessment of the relationship between inequality, income and economic growth in the regions of Kazakhstan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 511-521. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.42 Sypnowich, C. (2020). What’s wrong with equality of opportunity. Philosophical Topics, 48(2), 223-244. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48652127 Supiot, A. (2020). The spirit of Philadelphia: social justice vs. the total market. Verso Books. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/10332673 Staruski, J. (2020). Liberalism and the conflict of restraint. [BA thesis, Haverford College]. TriCollege Libraries. http://hdl.handle. net/10066/22689 Spytska, L. (2024). Practice-based methods of bringing to legal liability for anonymous defamation on the Internet and in the media. Social and Legal Studios, 7(1), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals1.2024.202 Hafandi, A. & Helmy, M. (2021). Creating a social justice trough zakat and its relevant to poverty alleviation: A perspective of Abul A’La Al-Maududi. An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 8(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.21274/an.v8i1.3622 Capeheart, L. & Milovanovic, D. (2020). Social justice: Theories, issues, and movements. (Revised and expanded edition). Rutgers University Press. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/13961357 Goldmann, L. (2011). Immanuel Kant. Verso. http://surl.li/sqdid Abril, J. C. (2025b). Culture: An Alternative Variable to Race in Criminology. Dialogues in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.71261/dhss/3.1.47.63 The study is dedicated to the pressing issue of understanding the philosophical foundations of social justice and equality in the context of the challenges posed by the modern globalised world. The purpose of the study is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the evolution of philosophical concepts of justice, identify key problems in ensuring equal opportunities and overcoming discrimination, and examine the impact of globalisation on social inequality. The study applied axiological and comparative methods, structural-functional, critical, and systems analyses. Based on a comparative examination of the theories of justice by J. Rawls, A. Sen, and A. Honneth, their conceptual advantages and limitations were identified, and the need for integrating the distributive paradigm while considering the expansion of real opportunities for people and ensuring full recognition was substantiated. The ambivalent impact of globalisation on social inequality was disclosed, and strategies for overcoming it on the principles of inclusivity and democratic participation were determined. The study emphasises the crucial role of collaboration between the state and civil society in advancing the values of social justice and implementing its principles in practice. The study contributes substantially to the development of philosophical discourse on the nature and principles of social justice, offering a comprehensive vision relevant to the challenges of the 21st-century pluralistic and globalised world. Discrimination vulnerable groups marginalised communities human rights social welfare state Journal article application/pdf https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/10401 Inglés https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Gomes, B. Grümme & A. Silva (Eds.), Justice and Peace: Theological Challenges, Fest in honour of Professor Erico João Hammes (pp. 79-96). Fundação Fênix Publisher. https://doi.org/10.36592/9786554600453-04 Abril, J. C. (2025a). Culture Efficacy: An Alternative to Collective Efficacy. Review of Law and Social Sciences, 3(1), 155-177. https://doi.org/10.71261/rlss/3.1.155.177 Publication Aguayo Westwood, P. (2021). Self-respect and the justification of Rawlsian principles of justice. Ethics and Social Welfare, 15(3), 232-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2021.1915355 Alencar, B. A. (2021). Normative reconstruction in Axel Honneth: A new principle for the theory of justice. Kínesis – Journal of Postgraduate Studies in Philosophy, 13(35), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.36311/1984-8900.2021.v13n35.p49-60 Gasda, É. (2023). Human rights, social justice and recognition. In T. Folkerts, J. (2024). The welfare state’s organising principle of justice. In J. Folkerts, Hegelian Welfare State: Hegel’s Contribution to Political Theory and the History of Ideas of Socio-Political Thought (pp. 183-295). Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43864-7_6 Flesher Fominaya, C. (2020). Social movements in a globalized world. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.perlego.com/book/2995707/social-movements-in-a-globalized-world-pdf Davids, N. & Waghid, Y. (2021). Academic activism in higher education: A living philosophy for social justice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0340-2 Chigubu, S. & Legwaila, T. (2021). Converging tax policy and human rights in the face of tax abuse: a developing country perspective. Constitutional Court Review, 11(1), 379-409. https://doi.org/10.2989/CCR.2021.0014 Chi, M. & Hong, X. (2023). Sergio puig, at the margins of globalization: Indigenous peoples and international economic law. In M. Bungenberg, M. Chi, S. Jusoh, P. Ranjan & I. Rustambekov (Eds.), Asian Yearbook of International Economic Law (pp. 227-230). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/16517_2023_22 Study on the philosophical aspects of social justice and equality in modern society Cammack, P. (2022). The politics of global competitiveness. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192847867.001.0001 Buribayev, Y. A., Oryntayev, Z. K., Khamzina, Z. A., Kussainov, S. Z. & Yermekov, A. T. (2015). Evaluation of the reform efficiency in public social sector management of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015. v6n3s5p191 Brown, K., Nickels, A. & Schaefer, H. (2020). Achieving social equity: from problems to solutions. Public Administration Review, 83(4), 999-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13682 Bracho Fuenmayor, P. (2023). Justice from the liberal perspective of Rawls and Nussbaum. Cuestiones Políticas, 41(76), 808-828. https://doi. org/10.46398/cuestpol.4176.48 Blunden, A. (2021). Amartya Sen on critical voice and social choice theory. In A. Blunden, Hegel, Marx and Vygotsky (pp. 339-354). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004470972_022 Anbumozhi, V., Kimura, F. & Thangavelu, S. (2020). Global supply chain resilience: Vulnerability and shifting risk management strategies. In V. Anbumozhi, F. Kimura & S. Thangavelu, Supply Chain Resilience (pp.3-14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2870-5_1 2462-9596 0124-6127 2024-07-01 2024-07-01T00:00:00Z 2024-07-01T00:00:00Z https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/10401/7890 10.17151/difil.2024.25.45.2 https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2024.25.45.2 47 15 |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE CALDAS |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECALDAS/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Discusiones Filosóficas |
| title |
Estudio sobre los aspectos filosóficos de la justicia social y la igualdad en la sociedad moderna |
| spellingShingle |
Estudio sobre los aspectos filosóficos de la justicia social y la igualdad en la sociedad moderna Kieliszek, Zdzislaw Smetaniak, Mariia Ihnatiev, Vitalii Kochkorova, Dinara Molla, Erjona comunidades marginadas estado social de derecho derechos humanos grupos vulnerables Discriminación Discrimination vulnerable groups marginalised communities human rights social welfare state |
| title_short |
Estudio sobre los aspectos filosóficos de la justicia social y la igualdad en la sociedad moderna |
| title_full |
Estudio sobre los aspectos filosóficos de la justicia social y la igualdad en la sociedad moderna |
| title_fullStr |
Estudio sobre los aspectos filosóficos de la justicia social y la igualdad en la sociedad moderna |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Estudio sobre los aspectos filosóficos de la justicia social y la igualdad en la sociedad moderna |
| title_sort |
estudio sobre los aspectos filosóficos de la justicia social y la igualdad en la sociedad moderna |
| title_eng |
Study on the philosophical aspects of social justice and equality in modern society |
| description |
Este estudio está dedicado al problema apremiante de entender los fundamentos filosóficos de la justicia social y la igualdad en el contexto de los retos planteados por el mundo globalizado moderno. El propósito de este estudio es realizar un análisis comprehensivo de la evolución de los conceptos filosóficos de justicia; identificar problemas clave al asegurar oportunidades iguales y superar la discriminación, y examinar el impacto de la globalización en la desigualdad social. Para ello, se aplican métodos axiológicos y comparativos, así como análisis estructurales-funcionales, críticos y sistemáticos. A partir de un examen comparativo de las teorías de la justicia de J. Rawls, A. Sen y A. Honneth, se identifican las ventajas y limitaciones conceptuales de cada una de ellas, así como la necesidad de integrar el paradigma distributivo considerando la expansión de oportunidades reales para las personas y asegurando que el reconocimiento total sea comprobado. Se expone el impacto ambivalente de la globalización en la desigualdad social y se determinaron estrategias para afrontarlo, sobre los principios de inclusividad y participación democrática. Además, se enfatiza el rol crucial de la colaboración entre el estado y la sociedad civil en el avance de los valores de la justicia social y en la implementación de sus principios en la práctica. Este estudio contribuye de forma sustancial al desarrollo de la discusión filosófica sobre la naturaleza y los principios de la justicia social, ofreciendo una revisión comprehensiva y relevante para los retos del mundo pluralista y globalizado del siglo XXI.
|
| description_eng |
The study is dedicated to the pressing issue of understanding the philosophical foundations of social justice and equality in the context of the challenges posed by the modern globalised world. The purpose of the study is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the evolution of philosophical concepts of justice, identify key problems in ensuring equal opportunities and overcoming discrimination, and examine the impact of globalisation on social inequality. The study applied axiological and comparative methods, structural-functional, critical, and systems analyses. Based on a comparative examination of the theories of justice by J. Rawls, A. Sen, and A. Honneth, their conceptual advantages and limitations were identified, and the need for integrating the distributive paradigm while considering the expansion of real opportunities for people and ensuring full recognition was substantiated. The ambivalent impact of globalisation on social inequality was disclosed, and strategies for overcoming it on the principles of inclusivity and democratic participation were determined. The study emphasises the crucial role of collaboration between the state and civil society in advancing the values of social justice and implementing its principles in practice. The study contributes substantially to the development of philosophical discourse on the nature and principles of social justice, offering a comprehensive vision relevant to the challenges of the 21st-century pluralistic and globalised world.
|
| author |
Kieliszek, Zdzislaw Smetaniak, Mariia Ihnatiev, Vitalii Kochkorova, Dinara Molla, Erjona |
| author_facet |
Kieliszek, Zdzislaw Smetaniak, Mariia Ihnatiev, Vitalii Kochkorova, Dinara Molla, Erjona |
| topicspa_str_mv |
comunidades marginadas estado social de derecho derechos humanos grupos vulnerables Discriminación |
| topic |
comunidades marginadas estado social de derecho derechos humanos grupos vulnerables Discriminación Discrimination vulnerable groups marginalised communities human rights social welfare state |
| topic_facet |
comunidades marginadas estado social de derecho derechos humanos grupos vulnerables Discriminación Discrimination vulnerable groups marginalised communities human rights social welfare state |
| citationvolume |
25 |
| citationissue |
45 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 45 , Año 2024 : Julio - Diciembre |
| publisher |
Universidad de Caldas |
| ispartofjournal |
Discusiones Filosóficas |
| source |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/10401 |
| language |
Inglés |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| references_eng |
Orazalieva, R. B., Bila, O. O., Pozdnyakova, O. L. & Derevyanko, N. V. (2020). Teacher’s use of a drawing workshop as a method of art therapy. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 8(3), 451-459.https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.23 Sarafa, O. & Oyewole, S. (2021). John Rawls on the theory of justice. In D. Abdulrahman (Ed.), Classical Theorists in the Social Sciences: From Western Ideas to African Realities (pp. 347-358). Malthouse Press Limited. http://surl.li/sqdhy Ryskaliyev, D. U., Zhapakov, S. M., Apakhayev, N., Moldakhmetova, Z., Buribayev, Y. A. & Khamzina, Z. A. (2019). Issues of gender equality in the workplace: The case study of Kazakhstan. Space and Culture, India, 7(2), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i2.450 Rodríguez García, T. (2022). Social and environmental equality, as principles of justice: Philosophical reflections. Universita Ciencia, 10(27), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6540032 Robeyns, I. (2021). The capability approach. In G. Berik & E. Kongar (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Economics (pp. 72-80). Routledge. https://n9.cl/4ashd Peterson, C. (2021). Is it not wrong, a balance which tilts, a plummet which deflects: a survey of social contract theory. In C. Peterson (Ed.), Beyond Civil Disobedience: Social Nullification and Black Citizenship (pp. 13-38). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77554-4_2 Pellegrini-Masini, G., Pirni, A. & Maran, S. (2020). Energy justice revisited: a critical review on the philosophical and political origins of equality. Energy Research & Social Science, 59, 101310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101310 Lynch, K., Kalaitzake, M. & Crean, M. (2021). Care and affective relations: social justice and sociology. The Sociological Review, 69(1), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120952744 McArthur, J. (2016). Assessment for social justice: The role of assessment in achieving social justice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 967-981. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1053429 Manimala, V. (2022). Globalization: A boon or a bane? In P. Jonkers & Y. Fu (Eds.), Crossing Boundaries: Challenges and Opportunities of Intercultural Dialogue (pp.193-204). Washington: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy. https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/files/60257060/Crossing_Boundaries._Challenges_and_Opportunities_of_Intercultural_Dialogue.pdf#page=198 Sfetcu, N. (2022). Plato, the Republic: on justice-dialectics and education. MultiMedia Publishing. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29990.19520 Kozera, T. (2022). Amartya Kumar Sen’s theory of justice in the perspective of the philosophy of law [ Doctoral thesis, University of Warszawski]. https://repozytorium.uw.edu.pl/entities/publication/d4d92103-b064-46d2-9469-780e1ee3e1ee Kjosavik, D. (2021). Sen and development as freedom. In G. Crawford & A. Abdulai (Eds.), Research Handbook on Democracy and Development (pp. 79-97). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112659.00011 Khamzina, Z., Buribayev, Y., Yermukanov, Y. & Alshurazova, A. (2020). Is it possible to achieve gender equality in Kazakhstan: Focus on employment and social protection. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 20(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229120927904 Khamzina, Z., Buribayev, Y., Almaganbetov, P., Tazhmagambet, A., Samaldykova, Z. & Apakhayev, N. (2020). Labor disputes in Kazakhstan: Results of legal regulation and future prospects. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 23(1), 1-14. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Labor-Disputes-in-Kazakhstan%3A-Results-of-Legal-and-Khamzina-Buribayev/6706ccd7d6869e013422dca0cf47dfe13067de20 Hutton, M. & Heath, T. (2020). Researching on the edge: Emancipatory praxis for social justice. European Journal of Marketing, 54(11), 2697-2721. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0150 Haghighat, S. (2020). Communitarianism between text and context. The Journal of Human Rights, 15(2), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.22096/hr.2020.139365.1257 Schmitz, V. (2021). Recognition and critical theory: Axel Honneth’s contributions to the Frankfurt school. [Doctoral thesis, Indiana University]. https://search.proquest.com/openview/c9bf81ec239c2c4ed28f3c5d67619ae6/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y Stübinger, E. (2023). Alternative economic approaches and the question of justice. Kohlhammer Publishers. https://doi.org/10.17433/978-3-17-043133-1 Shahzad, A. (2021). Robert Nozick’s libertarian framework of distributive/economic justice: A critical assessment of its prospects for providing global distributive justice. Pakistan Business Review, 22(4), 645-666. http://surl.li/sqdiq Zygmunt, A. (2007). Gender equality in employment and occupation in theory and practice in EU countries and Poland. University of Silesia. https://fbc.pionier.net.pl/id/oai:www.sbc.org.pl:4438 Weale, A. (2023). Equality and social policy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003369127 Smanova, A. B., Otynshiyeva, A. A., Saktaganova, I. S., Assanova, S., Lazim, A. M. & Beaver, K. M. (2024). Factors Associated with Achieving the Desired Level of Education in a Longitudinal and Nationally Representative Sample. Youth and Society. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0044118X241296114 Wade, R. (2004). Is globalization reducing poverty and inequality? World Development, 32(4), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.007 Ülgen, S. (2022). Rewiring globalization. Introduction. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/RewiringGlobalization_final_Revised1.pdf Gomes, M. & Gonçalves, A. (2021). The contribution of the theory of justice in John Rawls to sustainable development. Cadernos de Dereito Actual, 15, 56-71. https://www.cadernosdedereitoactual.es/index.php/cadernos/article/view/616 Turkebayeva, K., Bekturganova, M., Sabden, O., Dauliyeva, G. & Kenzhegulova, G. (2022). Assessment of the relationship between inequality, income and economic growth in the regions of Kazakhstan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 511-521. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.42 Sypnowich, C. (2020). What’s wrong with equality of opportunity. Philosophical Topics, 48(2), 223-244. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48652127 Supiot, A. (2020). The spirit of Philadelphia: social justice vs. the total market. Verso Books. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/10332673 Staruski, J. (2020). Liberalism and the conflict of restraint. [BA thesis, Haverford College]. TriCollege Libraries. http://hdl.handle. net/10066/22689 Spytska, L. (2024). Practice-based methods of bringing to legal liability for anonymous defamation on the Internet and in the media. Social and Legal Studios, 7(1), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals1.2024.202 Hafandi, A. & Helmy, M. (2021). Creating a social justice trough zakat and its relevant to poverty alleviation: A perspective of Abul A’La Al-Maududi. An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 8(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.21274/an.v8i1.3622 Capeheart, L. & Milovanovic, D. (2020). Social justice: Theories, issues, and movements. (Revised and expanded edition). Rutgers University Press. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/13961357 Goldmann, L. (2011). Immanuel Kant. Verso. http://surl.li/sqdid Abril, J. C. (2025b). Culture: An Alternative Variable to Race in Criminology. Dialogues in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.71261/dhss/3.1.47.63 Gomes, B. Grümme & A. Silva (Eds.), Justice and Peace: Theological Challenges, Fest in honour of Professor Erico João Hammes (pp. 79-96). Fundação Fênix Publisher. https://doi.org/10.36592/9786554600453-04 Abril, J. C. (2025a). Culture Efficacy: An Alternative to Collective Efficacy. Review of Law and Social Sciences, 3(1), 155-177. https://doi.org/10.71261/rlss/3.1.155.177 Aguayo Westwood, P. (2021). Self-respect and the justification of Rawlsian principles of justice. Ethics and Social Welfare, 15(3), 232-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2021.1915355 Alencar, B. A. (2021). Normative reconstruction in Axel Honneth: A new principle for the theory of justice. Kínesis – Journal of Postgraduate Studies in Philosophy, 13(35), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.36311/1984-8900.2021.v13n35.p49-60 Gasda, É. (2023). Human rights, social justice and recognition. In T. Folkerts, J. (2024). The welfare state’s organising principle of justice. In J. Folkerts, Hegelian Welfare State: Hegel’s Contribution to Political Theory and the History of Ideas of Socio-Political Thought (pp. 183-295). Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43864-7_6 Flesher Fominaya, C. (2020). Social movements in a globalized world. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.perlego.com/book/2995707/social-movements-in-a-globalized-world-pdf Davids, N. & Waghid, Y. (2021). Academic activism in higher education: A living philosophy for social justice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0340-2 Chigubu, S. & Legwaila, T. (2021). Converging tax policy and human rights in the face of tax abuse: a developing country perspective. Constitutional Court Review, 11(1), 379-409. https://doi.org/10.2989/CCR.2021.0014 Chi, M. & Hong, X. (2023). Sergio puig, at the margins of globalization: Indigenous peoples and international economic law. In M. Bungenberg, M. Chi, S. Jusoh, P. Ranjan & I. Rustambekov (Eds.), Asian Yearbook of International Economic Law (pp. 227-230). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/16517_2023_22 Cammack, P. (2022). The politics of global competitiveness. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192847867.001.0001 Buribayev, Y. A., Oryntayev, Z. K., Khamzina, Z. A., Kussainov, S. Z. & Yermekov, A. T. (2015). Evaluation of the reform efficiency in public social sector management of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015. v6n3s5p191 Brown, K., Nickels, A. & Schaefer, H. (2020). Achieving social equity: from problems to solutions. Public Administration Review, 83(4), 999-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13682 Bracho Fuenmayor, P. (2023). Justice from the liberal perspective of Rawls and Nussbaum. Cuestiones Políticas, 41(76), 808-828. https://doi. org/10.46398/cuestpol.4176.48 Blunden, A. (2021). Amartya Sen on critical voice and social choice theory. In A. Blunden, Hegel, Marx and Vygotsky (pp. 339-354). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004470972_022 Anbumozhi, V., Kimura, F. & Thangavelu, S. (2020). Global supply chain resilience: Vulnerability and shifting risk management strategies. In V. Anbumozhi, F. Kimura & S. Thangavelu, Supply Chain Resilience (pp.3-14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2870-5_1 |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2024-07-01 |
| date_accessioned |
2024-07-01T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2024-07-01T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/10401 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2024.25.45.2 |
| issn |
0124-6127 |
| eissn |
2462-9596 |
| doi |
10.17151/difil.2024.25.45.2 |
| citationstartpage |
15 |
| citationendpage |
47 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/10401/7890 |
| _version_ |
1833252308972994560 |