Titulo:

Evaluación del bienestar bovino: Evolución hacia el enfoque de los 5 Dominios
.

Guardado en:

0122-0268

1909-0544

29

2024-07-30

e3337

e3337

Sonia Alejandra Romera, María Eugenia Munilla, Catalina Medrano-Galarza - 2024

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id oai:revistas.unicordoba.edu.co:article_3337
record_format ojs
spelling Evaluación del bienestar bovino: Evolución hacia el enfoque de los 5 Dominios
Romera, Sonia Alejandra
Munilla, María Eugenia
Medrano-Galarza, Catalina
Bovine welfare
behavior
domains
mental state
indicators
protocols
Bienestar bovino
comportamiento
5 dominios
estado mental
indicadores
protocolos
29
2
Núm. 2 , Año 2024 : Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 29(2) Mayo-Agosto 2024
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2024-07-30T05:11:13Z
2024-07-30T05:11:13Z
2024-07-30
application/pdf
application/pdf
audio/mpeg
audio/mpeg
Universidad de Córdoba
Revista MVZ Córdoba
0122-0268
1909-0544
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/3337
10.21897/rmvz.3337
https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.3337
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Sonia Alejandra Romera, María Eugenia Munilla, Catalina Medrano-Galarza - 2024
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
e3337
e3337
Meagher RK, Beaver A, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG. Invited review: A systematic review of the effects of prolonged cow–calf contact on behavior, welfare, and productivity. J Dairy Sci. 2019; 102(7):5765–5783. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-16021
Tarazona AM, Ceballos MC, Broom DM. Human Relationships with Domestic and Other Animals: One Health, One Welfare, One Biology. Animals. 2020; 10(1):43. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10010043
Mench JA. Farm animal welfare in the U.S.A.: Farming practices, research, education, regulation, and assurance programs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2008; 113(4):298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.009
Veissier I, Butterworth A, Bock B, Roe E. European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2008; 113(4):279–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.008
Barnett JL, Hemsworth PH. Welfare Monitoring Schemes: Using Research to Safeguard Welfare of Animals on the Farm. J Appl Animal Welfare Sci. 2009; 12(2):114–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888700902719856
Blokhuis HJ, Veissier I, Miele M, Jones B. The Welfare Quality® project and beyond: Safeguarding farm animal well-being. Acta Agric Scand - A: Anim. 2010; 60(3):129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2010.523480
Fraser D, Weary DM, Pajor EA, Milligan BN, Milligan BN. A Scientific Conception of Animal Welfare that Reflects Ethical. Anim Welfare. 1997; 6:187-205. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=ethawel
Mellor DJ, Reid CSW. Concepts of animal well-being and predicting the impact of procedures on experimental animals. Wellbing Intern. 1997. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=exprawel
Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ, Littlewood KE, McLean AN, McGreevy PD, Jones B, et al. The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including Human–Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare. Animals. 2020; 10(10):1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101870
Lawrence AB, Vigors B, Sandøe P. What Is so Positive about Positive Animal Welfare?-A Critical Review of the Literature. Animals. 2022; 9(10):783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100783
Mellor DJ. Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards “A Life Worth Living.” Animals. 2016; 6(3):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6030021
Yeates J. Naturalness and Animal Welfare. Animals. 2018; 8(4):53. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8040053
Andreasen SN, Wemelsfelder F, Sandøe P, Forkman B. The correlation of Qualitative Behavior Assessments with Welfare Quality® protocol outcomes in on-farm welfare assessment of dairy cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2013; 15:143(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.11.013
Canali E, Keeling L. Welfare Quality® project: From scientific research to on farm assessment of animal welfare. Ital J Anim Sci. 2009; 8(SUPPL 2):900–903. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s2.900
Racciatti DS, Bottegal DN, Aguilar NM, Menichelli ML, Soteras T, Zimerman M, et al. Development of a welfare assessment protocol for practical application in Argentine feedlots. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2022; 253:105662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105662
Martínez GM, Suárez VH. Protocolo de evaluación de bienestar animal en tambos del noroeste argentino. Colección Investigaón, Desarrollo e Innovación: Santa Ediciones-INTA; 2017. https://www.ocla.org.ar/noticias/14798784-protocolo-de-evaluacion-de-buenas-practicas-en-tambos-bovinos-del-noroeste-argen
Salas MÁS, Cardona MGT, Pérez LB, Peralta Ortiz JJG, Del Rosario Jiménez-Badillo M. Evaluación de bienestar de vacas lecheras en sistema de producción a pequeña escala aplicando el protocolo propuesto por Welfare Quality®. Rev Mex Ciencias Pecu. 2017; 8(1):53–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v8i1.4306
Capdeville J, Veissier I. A method of assessing welfare in loose housed dairy cows at farm level, Focusing on animal observations. Acta Agric Scand A-Anim Sci. 2001; 51(030):62–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/090647001316923081
De Rosa G, Di Palo R, Serafini R, Grasso F, Bragaglio A, Braghieri A, et al. Different assessment systems fail to agree on the evaluation of dairy cattle welfare at farm level. Livest Sci. 2019; 229:145–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.09.024
Grandin T. Practical Application of the Five Domains Animal Welfare Framework for Supply Food Animal Chain Managers. Animals. 2022; 12(20):2831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202831
Broom DM. Indicators of poor welfare. Br Vet J. 1986; 142(6):524–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(86)90109-0
Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario. Metodología para la evaluación de bienestar animal en las especies bovina y bufalina. 2022. https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/Areas/Pecuaria/Servicios/Inocuidad-en-las-Cadenas-Agroalimentarias/Bienestar-Animal/Metodologia-bienestar-en-bovinos-y-bufalos.pdf.aspx?lang=es-CO
Odeón M, Romera S. Estrés en ganado: causas y consecuencias. Rev Vet. 2017; 28(1):69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.30972/vet.2811556
Romero Peñuela M, Uribe-Velásquez L, Sánchez Valencia J. Biomarcadores De Estrés Como Indicadores De Bienestar Animal En Ganado De Carne. Biosalud. 2011; 10(1):71–87. https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/biosalud/article/view/4753/4338
Park RM, Foster M, Daigle CL. A scoping review: The impact of housing systems and environmental features on beef cattle welfare. Animals. 2020; 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040565
Mason GJ. Stereotypies: a critical review. Anim Behav. 1991; 41:1015–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80640-2
Newby JM, Mackenzie A, Williams AD, Mcintyre K, Watts S, Wong N, et al. Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for mixed anxiety and depression: a randomized controlled trial and evidence of effectiveness in primary care. Psychol Med Psychol Med. 2013; 43(12):2635-2648. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713000111
Bak Jensen M, Erik Larsen L. Effects of level of social contact on dairy calf behavior and health. J Dairy Sci. 2014; 97:5035–44. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7311
Miranda-de la Lama G. Comportamiento y bienestar en la produccion animal: Hacia una interpretación integral. REDVET. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria, vol. IX, núm. 10B, octubre, 2008, pp. 1-8. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/636/63617111003.pdf
Mason GJ. Stereotypies: a critical review. Anim. Behav. 1991, 41, 1015-1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80640-2
Wredle E, Rushen J, de Passillé AM, Munksgaard L. Training cattle to approach a feed source in response to auditory signals. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 84(4): 567-572. https://doi.org/10.4141/A03-081
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/3337/5772
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/3337/5773
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/3337/5774
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/3337/5775
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/3337/5776
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE CORDOBA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECORDOBA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista MVZ Córdoba
title Evaluación del bienestar bovino: Evolución hacia el enfoque de los 5 Dominios
spellingShingle Evaluación del bienestar bovino: Evolución hacia el enfoque de los 5 Dominios
Romera, Sonia Alejandra
Munilla, María Eugenia
Medrano-Galarza, Catalina
Bovine welfare
behavior
domains
mental state
indicators
protocols
Bienestar bovino
comportamiento
5 dominios
estado mental
indicadores
protocolos
title_short Evaluación del bienestar bovino: Evolución hacia el enfoque de los 5 Dominios
title_full Evaluación del bienestar bovino: Evolución hacia el enfoque de los 5 Dominios
title_fullStr Evaluación del bienestar bovino: Evolución hacia el enfoque de los 5 Dominios
title_full_unstemmed Evaluación del bienestar bovino: Evolución hacia el enfoque de los 5 Dominios
title_sort evaluación del bienestar bovino: evolución hacia el enfoque de los 5 dominios
author Romera, Sonia Alejandra
Munilla, María Eugenia
Medrano-Galarza, Catalina
author_facet Romera, Sonia Alejandra
Munilla, María Eugenia
Medrano-Galarza, Catalina
topic Bovine welfare
behavior
domains
mental state
indicators
protocols
Bienestar bovino
comportamiento
5 dominios
estado mental
indicadores
protocolos
topic_facet Bovine welfare
behavior
domains
mental state
indicators
protocols
Bienestar bovino
comportamiento
5 dominios
estado mental
indicadores
protocolos
citationvolume 29
citationissue 2
citationedition Núm. 2 , Año 2024 : Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 29(2) Mayo-Agosto 2024
publisher Universidad de Córdoba
ispartofjournal Revista MVZ Córdoba
source https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/3337
language
format Article
rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Sonia Alejandra Romera, María Eugenia Munilla, Catalina Medrano-Galarza - 2024
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2024-07-30
date_accessioned 2024-07-30T05:11:13Z
date_available 2024-07-30T05:11:13Z
url https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/3337
url_doi https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.3337
issn 0122-0268
eissn 1909-0544
doi 10.21897/rmvz.3337
citationstartpage e3337
citationendpage e3337
url2_str_mv https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/3337/5772
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/3337/5773
url7_str_mv https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/3337/5774
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/3337/5775
url3_str_mv https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/3337/5776
_version_ 1811201147893972992