Titulo:

Oral corrective feedback in language teaching: A historical perspective
.

Guardado en:

2539-4185

2

2017-12-02

7

22

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id oai:revistas.unicordoba.edu.co:article_1482
record_format ojs
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE CORDOBA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDECORDOBA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Avances en Educación y Humanidades
title Oral corrective feedback in language teaching: A historical perspective
spellingShingle Oral corrective feedback in language teaching: A historical perspective

title_short Oral corrective feedback in language teaching: A historical perspective
title_full Oral corrective feedback in language teaching: A historical perspective
title_fullStr Oral corrective feedback in language teaching: A historical perspective
title_full_unstemmed Oral corrective feedback in language teaching: A historical perspective
title_sort oral corrective feedback in language teaching: a historical perspective
author
author_facet
citationvolume 2
citationissue 2
citationedition Núm. 2 , Año 2017 : Avances en Educación y Humanidades Vol. 2, No. 2, julio-diciembre 2017
publisher Universidad de Córdoba
ispartofjournal Avances en Educación y Humanidades
source https://revistas.unicordoba.edu.co/index.php/avedhum/article/view/1482
language
format Article
rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2017-12-02
date_accessioned 2017-12-02T00:00:00Z
date_available 2017-12-02T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.unicordoba.edu.co/index.php/avedhum/article/view/1482
url_doi https://doi.org/10.21897/25394185.1482
eissn 2539-4185
doi 10.21897/25394185.1482
citationstartpage 7
citationendpage 22
url2_str_mv https://revistas.unicordoba.edu.co/index.php/avedhum/article/download/1482/1749
_version_ 1811199724315738112
spelling Oral corrective feedback in language teaching: A historical perspective
2
2
Núm. 2 , Año 2017 : Avances en Educación y Humanidades Vol. 2, No. 2, julio-diciembre 2017
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2017-12-02T00:00:00Z
2017-12-02T00:00:00Z
2017-12-02
application/pdf
Universidad de Córdoba
Avances en Educación y Humanidades
2539-4185
https://revistas.unicordoba.edu.co/index.php/avedhum/article/view/1482
10.21897/25394185.1482
https://doi.org/10.21897/25394185.1482
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
7
22
Aljaafreh, A.& Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483. Allwright, R. L. (1975). Problems in the study of the language teacher’s treatment of error. In M. K. Burt & H. D. Dulay (Eds.), On TESOL ’75: New directions in second language learning, teaching, and bilingual education (pp. 96-109). Washington, D.C.: TESOL. Bohlke, D. (2014). Fluency-oriented second language teaching. In Celce-Murcia, M., D. Brinton & M. Snow (Eds.). Teaching English as a second or foreign language Fourth Edition (pp. 121- 135). Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Burt, M. 1975. Error analysis in the adult EFL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 9, 53-63. Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors. Language Learning 27(1), 29-46. Edmondson, W. (1985) Discourse worlds in the classroom and in foreign language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7, 159–68. Ellis, R. (2017). Oral corrective feedback in L2 classrooms: What we know so far. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.). Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory. applications, implications (pp. 3-18). Abingdon: Routledge. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, 339-368. Ellis, R. & Mifka-Provozic, N. (2013). Recasts, uptake and noticing. In J. Bergeleitner, S. Frota, & J. Yoshioka (Eds). Noticing and Second Language Acquisition: Studies in Honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 61-79). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center. Erlam, R., R. Ellis, & R. Batstone. (2013). Oral corrective feedback on L2 writing: Two approaches compared. System 41 (2), 257-268 Fanselow, J. (1977). The treatment of error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals 10, 583-593. Heft, T & Hegelheimer, V. (2017). Computer-assisted corrective feedback and language learning. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.). Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning ( pp. 51-65). Abingdon: Routledge. Hendrickson, J. M. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice. Modern Language Journal 62(8), 387-398. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London ; New York: Longman. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: a meta-analysis. [Article]. Language Learning 60(2), 309-365.. Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27(3), 361-386. Long, M. 1991. Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.). Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Long, M. B. (1977). Teacher feedback on learner error: mapping cognitions. In B. D. Brown, C. A. Yorio, and R. H. Crymes (eds.), Qn TESOL’77 Teachjng and learning English as a secondTrends in research and practice (pp. 278-293.Washington, D. C.: TESOL. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (Eds.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press. Long, M. H. (2006). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lyster, R, Recasts, repetition and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20 (1), 51-81 Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(3), 399-432. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19(1), 37-66. Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(Special Issue 2), 265-302. Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics 27(3), 405-430. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. M. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning (pp. 379-452). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics 29, 404-427. Mifka Profozic, N. (2013). The effectiveness of corrective feedback and the role of individual differences in language learning: A Classroom Study. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang. Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness 9(1), 34-51. Nystrom, N. (1983). Teacher-student interaction in bilingual classrooms: four approaches to error feedback. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 169-188). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Quinn, P., & Nakata, T. (2017). The timing of oral corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 35-47). Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning 62, 93-132. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158 Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning teaching: A guidebook for English language teachers. Oxford: MacMillan Education. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research 8, 263-300. Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language Anxiety, modified output, and L2 .earning. Language Learning 58, 835-874. Sheen, Y. and Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (2nd edition) (pp. 593-610). New York: Routledge. Spada, N, & Lightbown, P. M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 205-224. Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://revistas.unicordoba.edu.co/index.php/avedhum/article/download/1482/1749
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication