Titulo:
Propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de competencias investigativas: una revisión sistemática
.
Sumario:
El estudio tuvo como finalidad explorar las propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de competencias investigativas publicados en la literatura científica en siete (7) Bases de datos: Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, Embase, EBSCO, PubMed y SciELO entre el 2014 y junio del 2023. Se sistematizaron 13 documentos, donde se encontró 11 escalas que midieron la validez de contenido utilizando índices como el S-CVI, V de Aiken y correlaciones ítem test. De igual manera, los resultados de los análisis factoriales exploratorios (AFE) y confirmatorios (AFC) presentaron adecuados índices de ajuste como CFI, GFI, TLI, SRMR y RMSEA que validaron la estructura factorial. La confiabilidad se evaluó mayoritariamente a través del coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach,... Ver más
Guardado en:
2307-7999
2310-4635
11
2023-12-31
e1868
e1868
Calixto Tapullima-Mori, José Livia Segovia, Nieves del Pilar Pizzán Tomanguillo, Sandra Lucero Pizzán Tomanguillo, Milagros Iñipe Cachay, Astrid Irene Saenz Chisquipama, Fiorella Gómez Sangama - 2023
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
metarevistapublica_usil_propositosyrepresentaciones_48_article_1868 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de competencias investigativas: una revisión sistemática Psychometric Properties of Research Competency Scales: A Systematic Review El estudio tuvo como finalidad explorar las propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de competencias investigativas publicados en la literatura científica en siete (7) Bases de datos: Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, Embase, EBSCO, PubMed y SciELO entre el 2014 y junio del 2023. Se sistematizaron 13 documentos, donde se encontró 11 escalas que midieron la validez de contenido utilizando índices como el S-CVI, V de Aiken y correlaciones ítem test. De igual manera, los resultados de los análisis factoriales exploratorios (AFE) y confirmatorios (AFC) presentaron adecuados índices de ajuste como CFI, GFI, TLI, SRMR y RMSEA que validaron la estructura factorial. La confiabilidad se evaluó mayoritariamente a través del coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach, arrojando valores altos y consistentes. Además, se han empleado coeficientes como Omega de McDonald, Omega ordinal, Guttman y Spearman Brown, todos reflejando un valor por encima de .70 y consistencia interna en las mediciones. En síntesis, los instrumentos como el RCS, SRCS, RPCS, SPRDS, EAHIF, AHABI, ERL, cuestionarios de autopercepción y rúbricas han demostrado ser herramientas eficaces en la evaluación y desarrollo de habilidades investigativas. En ese sentido, estas escalas pueden mejorar la evaluación y desarrollo de habilidades investigativas en estudiantes universitarios, y se espera que futuras investigaciones las utilicen para evaluar enfoques pedagógicos y contextos internacionales. The study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of research competency scales published in the scientific literature in seven databases: Scopus, Web Of Science, ERIC, Embase, EBSCO, PubMed and SciELO between 2014 and June 2023. Thirteen papers were systematized, where 11 scales were found that measured content validity using indexes such as the S-CVI, Aiken's V and item-test correlations. Similarly, the results of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) presented adequate fit indices such as CFI, GFI, TLI, SRMR and RMSEA, which validated the factor structure. Reliability was mostly evaluated through Cronbach's Alpha coefficient, yielding high and consistent values. In addition, coefficients such as McDonald's Omega, ordinal Omega, Guttman and Spearman Brown have been used, all reflecting a value above .70 and internal consistency in the measurements. In synthesis, instruments such as the RCS, SRCS, RPCS, SPRDS, EAHIF, AHABI, ERL, self-perception questionnaires and rubrics have proven to be effective tools in the assessment and development of research skills. In that sense, these scales can improve the assessment and development of research skills in university students, and it is expected that future research will use them to evaluate pedagogical approaches and international contexts. Tapullima-Mori, Calixto Livia Segovia, José Pizzán Tomanguillo, Nieves del Pilar Pizzán Tomanguillo, Sandra Lucero Iñipe Cachay, Milagros Saenz Chisquipama, Astrid Irene Gómez Sangama, Fiorella Competencias investigativas Validez Confiabilidad Psicometría Revisión sistemática Research skills Validity Reliability Psychometrics Systematic review 11 3 Núm. 3 , Año 2023 : Setiembre - Diciembre Artículo de revista Journal article 2023-12-31T00:00:00Z 2023-12-31T00:00:00Z 2023-12-31 application/pdf application/pdf text/xml text/xml Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú. Propósitos y Representaciones 2307-7999 2310-4635 https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1868 10.20511/pyr2023.v11n3.1868 https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2023.v11n3.1868 spa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Calixto Tapullima-Mori, José Livia Segovia, Nieves del Pilar Pizzán Tomanguillo, Sandra Lucero Pizzán Tomanguillo, Milagros Iñipe Cachay, Astrid Irene Saenz Chisquipama, Fiorella Gómez Sangama - 2023 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0. e1868 e1868 Alavi, M., Hunt, G. E., Thapa, D. K., & Cleary, M. (2022). Conducting Systematic Reviews of the Quality and Psychometric Properties of Health-Related Measurement Instruments: Finding the Right Tool for the Job. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 43(4), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2021.1978599 Aliaga-Pacora, A. A., Juárez-Hernández, L. G., & Herrera-Meza, R. (2021). Diseño y validez de contenido de una rúbrica analítica socioformativa para evaluar competencias investigativas en posgrado. Apuntes Universitarios, 11(2), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i2.632 Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2019). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066 Andrade, C. (2021). The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(1), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000 Barrios, E., & Ulises, D. (2020). Diseño y validación del cuestionario “Actitud hacia la investigación en estudiantes universitarios”. Revista Innova Educación, 2(2), 280–302. https://doi.org/10.35622/j.rie.2020.02.004 Böttcher-Oschmann, F., Groß, J., & Thiel, F. (2019). Validierung eines Fragenbogens zur Erfassung studentischer Forschungskompetenzen über Selbsteinschätzungen – Ein Instrument zur Evaluation forschungsorientierter Lehr-Lernarrangements. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 47(4), 495–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-019-00053-8 Bracho, M. S., Fernández, M., y Díaz, J. (2021). Técnicas e instrumentos de recolección de información: Análisis y procesamiento realizado por el investigador cualitativo. Revista Científica UISRAEL, 8(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.35290/rcui.v8n1.2021.400 Buntins, K., Kerres, M., & Heinemann, A. (2021). A scoping review of research instruments for measuring student engagement: In need for convergence. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100099 Castellanos, Y. A., & Rios-González, C. M. (2017). The importance of scientific research in higher education. Medicina Universitaria, 19(74), 19–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmu.2016.11.002 Castro-Rodríguez, Y. (2021). Systematic review of the instruments for measuring research skills in higher medical education. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas, 20(2), 1–14. https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDARTICULO=108609 Castro-Rodríguez, Y. A. (2023). Marco de referencia de las competencias investigativas para la Educación Médica. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, 34(0). https://acimed.sld.cu/index.php/acimed/article/view/2190 Cater, M., Ferstel, S. D., & O’Neil, C. E. (2016). Psychometric Properties of the Inventory of Student Experiences in Undergraduate Research. The Journal of General Education, 65(3–4), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.5325/jgeneeduc.65.3-4.0283 Charumbira, M. Y., Berner, K., & Louw, Q. A. (2021). Research competencies for undergraduate rehabilitation students: A scoping review. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 13(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.7196/AJHPE.2021.v13i1.1229 Chen, Q., Huang, C., Castro, A. R., & Tang, S. (2021). Instruments for measuring nursing research competence: A protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open, 11(2), e042325. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042325 Cobos, F., Peñaherrera, M., & Ortiz, A. M. (2016). Validation of a questionnaire on research-based learning with engineering students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.227 Cota, L. V., & Beltran-Sanchez, J. A. (2021). Propiedades métricas de cuatro subescalas para medir la competencia investigativa de docentes universitarios mexicanos. Innovación Educativa, 21(85), 1. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8868985 da Silva, F. C., Gonçalves, E., Arancibia, B. A. V., Bento, G. G., Castro, T. L. da S., Hernandez, S. S. S., & da Silva, R. (2015). Estimators of internal consistency in health research: The use of the alpha coefficient. Revista Peruana De Medicina Experimental Y Salud Publica, 32(1), 129–138. http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/rins/v32n1/a19v32n1.pdf da Silva, R. C., Ribeiro, M. D., Pereira, W., & Mollo, W. R. (2023). Mentoring in research: Development of competencies for health professionals. BMC Nursing, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01411-9 Duru, P., & Örsal, Ö. (2021). Development of the Scientific Research Competency Scale for nurses. Journal of Research in Nursing, 26(7), 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871211020061 Echevarría-Guanilo, M. E., Gonçalves, N., & Romanoski, P. J. (2019). Psychometric Properties of Measurement Instruments: Conceptual Basis and Evaluation Methods - Part Ii. Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem, 28. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/714/71465278102/html/ Escobedo, M. T., Hernández, J. A., Estebané, V., & Martínez, G. (2016). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales: Características, fases, construcción, aplicación y resultados. Ciencia & trabajo, 18(55), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-24492016000100004 García-González, J. R., & Sánchez-Sánchez, P. A. (2020). Diseño teórico de la investigación: Instrucciones metodológicas para el desarrollo de propuestas y proyectos de investigación científica. Información tecnológica, 31(6), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642020000600159 García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 23, e28600–e28600. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600 Gess, C., Geiger, C., & Ziegler, M. (2019). Social-Scientific Research Competency. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(5), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000451 Gros, S., Canet-Vélez, O., Contreras-Higuera, W., Garcia-Expósito, J., Torralbas-Ortega, J., & Roca, J. (2022). Translation, Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the Spanish Version of the Attitudes towards Research and Development within Nursing Questionnaire. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), 4623. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084623 Groß, J., Wolf, R., Schladitz, S., & Wirtz, M. (2017). Assessment of educational research literacy in higher education: Construct validation of the factorial structure of an assessment instrument comparing different treatments of omitted responses. Journal for Educational Research Online, 9(2), 37–68. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-148962 Guerrero-Narbajo, Y., Rosario-Quiroz, F., & Santos-Morocho, J. (2023). Diseño y validación de la Escala de Autoevaluación de Habilidades para la Investigación Formativa (EAHIF) en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Cubana de Educación Superior, 42(2), 139–155. https://revistas.uh.cu/rces/article/view/6920 Hernández, C. A., Gamboa, A. A., & Avendaño, W. R. (2021). Validación de una escala para evaluar competencias investigativas en docente de básica y media. Revista Boletín Redipe, 10(6), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.36260/rbr.v10i6.1335 Hernández, R. M., Saavedra-López, M. A., Calle-Ramirez, X. M., & Rodríguez-Fuentes, A. (2021). Index of Undergraduate Students’ Attitude towards Scientific Research: A Study in Peru and Spain. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30480 Howard, A., & Michael, P. G. (2019). Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Attitudes Toward Research Scale in a Graduate Student Sample. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719842695 Ianni, P. A., Samuels, E. M., Eakin, B. L., Perorazio, T. E., & Ellingrod, V. L. (2021). Assessments of Research Competencies for Clinical Investigators: A Systematic Review. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 44(3), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278719896392 Ipanaqué-Zapata, M., Figueroa-Quiñones, J., Bazalar-Palacios, J., Arhuis-Inca, W., Quiñones-Negrete, M., & Villarreal-Zegarra, D. (2023). Research skills for university students’ thesis in E-learning: Scale development and validation in Peru. Heliyon, 9(3), e13770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13770 Jager, J., Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2017). More than Just Convenient: The Scientific Merits of Homogeneous Convenience Samples. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 82(2), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12296 Jeréz, I. E. H., Laza, O. U., Martorell, L. de la C. M., & Hernández, L. L. (2022). Habilidades investigativas de los licenciados en enfermería en el Instituto de Hematología e Inmunología. Revista Cubana de Hematología, Inmunología y Hemoterapia, 38(4). https://revhematologia.sld.cu/index.php/hih/article/view/1706 Kaur, R., Hakim, J., Jeremy, R., Coorey, G., Kalman, E., Jenkin, R., Bowen, D. G., & Hart, J. (2023). Students’ perceived research skills development and satisfaction after completion of a mandatory research project: Results from five cohorts of the Sydney medical program. BMC Medical Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04475-y Madadizadeh, F., & Bahariniya, S. (2023). Tutorial on how to calculating content validity of scales in medical research. Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management, 31, 100315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2023.100315 Mallidou, A. A., Borycki, E., Frisch, N., & Young, L. (2018). Research Competencies Assessment Instrument for Nurses: Preliminary Psychometric Properties. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 26(3), E159–E182. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.26.3.E159 Maric, D., Fore, G. A., Nyarko, S. C., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2023). Measurement in STEM education research: A systematic literature review of trends in the psychometric evidence of scales. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00430-x McKechnie, D., & Fisher, M. J. (2022). Considerations when examining the psychometric properties of measurement instruments used in health. AJAN - The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.37464/2020.392.481 Merino-Soto, C., Fernández-Arata, M., Fuentes-Balderrama, J., Chans, G. M., & Toledano-Toledano, F. (2022). Research Perceived Competency Scale: A New Psychometric Adaptation for University Students’ Research Learning. Sustainability, 14(19), 12036. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912036 Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-22 Newman, I., Lim, J., & Pineda, F. (2013). Content Validity Using a Mixed Methods Approach: Its Application and Development Through the Use of a Table of Specifications Methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813476922 Nolazco-Labajos, F. A., Guerrero, M. A., Carhuancho-Mendoza, I. M., & Saravia, G. del P. (2022). Competencia investigativa estudiantil durante la pandemia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, XXVIII(6), 228–243. https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/rcs/article/view/38834 Oviedo, H. C., & Campo-Arias, A. (2005). Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 34(4), 572–580. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0034-74502005000400009&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Alonso-Fernández, S. (2021). Declaración PRISMA 2020: Una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista Española de Cardiología, 74(9), 790–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016 Qiu, C., Feng, X., Reinhardt, J. D., & Li, J. (2019). Development and psychometric testing of the Research Competency Scale for Nursing Students: An instrument design study. Nurse Education Today, 79, 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.039 Ranganathan, P., & Aggarwal, R. (2020). Study designs: Part 7 – Systematic reviews. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 11(2), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_84_20 Roberts, L. D., & Povee, K. (2014). A brief measure of attitudes toward mixed methods research in psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01312 Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2018). The development and validation of the scholar–practitioner research development scale for students enrolled in professional doctoral programs. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 10(4), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2018-0011 Rodríguez, A., Caurcel, M. J., Gallardo, C. del P., & García, A. (2023). Reconocimiento y actitud hacia la investigación educativa en la Universidad. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado. Continuación de la antigua Revista de Escuelas Normales, 98(37.1). https://doi.org/10.47553/rifop.v98i37.1.97824 Smith, S. E., Newsome, A. S., Hawkins, W. A., Bland, C. M., & Branan, T. N. (2020). Teaching research skills to student pharmacists: A multi-campus, multi-semester applied critical care research elective. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 12(6), 735–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.01.020 Swank, J. M., & Lambie, G. W. (2016). Development of the Research Competencies Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175615625749 Toro, R., Peña-Sarmiento, M., Avendaño-Prieto, B. L., Mejía-Vélez, S., & Bernal-Torres, A. (2022). Análisis Empírico del Coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach según Opciones de Respuesta, Muestra y Observaciones Atípicas. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 63(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP63.2.02 Torres, S. A., & Manchego, J. L. (2023). Research competencies in Ibero-American university students: A systematic review. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(1), 2784–2802. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i1.454 Tuononen, T., & Parpala, A. (2021). The role of academic competences and learning processes in predicting Bachelor’s and Master’s thesis grades. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101001 Valderrama, M. W., Pérez, C. L., Llaque, G., & Matute, J. C. (2022). Investigative skills in university students. A systematic review. LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2022.1.1.127 Ventura-León, J., & Peña-Calero, B. N. (2020). El mundo no debería girar alrededor del alfa de Cronbach ≥ ,70. Adicciones, 33(4), 369–372. https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1576 Vieno, K., Rogers, K. A., & Campbell, N. (2022). Broadening the Definition of ‘Research Skills’ to Enhance Students’ Competence across Undergraduate and Master’s Programs. Education Sciences, 12(10), 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100642 Xiao, L., & Hau, K.T. (2022). Performance of Coefficient Alpha and Its Alternatives: Effects of Different Types of Non-Normality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 83(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644221088240 Zakariya, Y. F. (2022). Cronbach’s alpha in mathematics education research: Its appropriateness, overuse, and alternatives in estimating scale reliability. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074430 Zangaro, G. A. (2019). Importance of Reporting Psychometric Properties of Instruments Used in Nursing Research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 41(11), 1548–1550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919866827 https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/download/1868/1841 https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/download/1868/1848 https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/download/1868/1864 https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/download/1868/1865 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD SAN IGNACIO DE LOYOLA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/USIL/logo.png |
| country_str |
Perú |
| collection |
Propósitos y Representaciones |
| title |
Propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de competencias investigativas: una revisión sistemática |
| spellingShingle |
Propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de competencias investigativas: una revisión sistemática Tapullima-Mori, Calixto Livia Segovia, José Pizzán Tomanguillo, Nieves del Pilar Pizzán Tomanguillo, Sandra Lucero Iñipe Cachay, Milagros Saenz Chisquipama, Astrid Irene Gómez Sangama, Fiorella Competencias investigativas Validez Confiabilidad Psicometría Revisión sistemática Research skills Validity Reliability Psychometrics Systematic review |
| title_short |
Propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de competencias investigativas: una revisión sistemática |
| title_full |
Propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de competencias investigativas: una revisión sistemática |
| title_fullStr |
Propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de competencias investigativas: una revisión sistemática |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de competencias investigativas: una revisión sistemática |
| title_sort |
propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de competencias investigativas: una revisión sistemática |
| title_eng |
Psychometric Properties of Research Competency Scales: A Systematic Review |
| description |
El estudio tuvo como finalidad explorar las propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de competencias investigativas publicados en la literatura científica en siete (7) Bases de datos: Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, Embase, EBSCO, PubMed y SciELO entre el 2014 y junio del 2023. Se sistematizaron 13 documentos, donde se encontró 11 escalas que midieron la validez de contenido utilizando índices como el S-CVI, V de Aiken y correlaciones ítem test. De igual manera, los resultados de los análisis factoriales exploratorios (AFE) y confirmatorios (AFC) presentaron adecuados índices de ajuste como CFI, GFI, TLI, SRMR y RMSEA que validaron la estructura factorial. La confiabilidad se evaluó mayoritariamente a través del coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach, arrojando valores altos y consistentes. Además, se han empleado coeficientes como Omega de McDonald, Omega ordinal, Guttman y Spearman Brown, todos reflejando un valor por encima de .70 y consistencia interna en las mediciones. En síntesis, los instrumentos como el RCS, SRCS, RPCS, SPRDS, EAHIF, AHABI, ERL, cuestionarios de autopercepción y rúbricas han demostrado ser herramientas eficaces en la evaluación y desarrollo de habilidades investigativas. En ese sentido, estas escalas pueden mejorar la evaluación y desarrollo de habilidades investigativas en estudiantes universitarios, y se espera que futuras investigaciones las utilicen para evaluar enfoques pedagógicos y contextos internacionales.
|
| description_eng |
The study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of research competency scales published in the scientific literature in seven databases: Scopus, Web Of Science, ERIC, Embase, EBSCO, PubMed and SciELO between 2014 and June 2023. Thirteen papers were systematized, where 11 scales were found that measured content validity using indexes such as the S-CVI, Aiken's V and item-test correlations. Similarly, the results of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) presented adequate fit indices such as CFI, GFI, TLI, SRMR and RMSEA, which validated the factor structure. Reliability was mostly evaluated through Cronbach's Alpha coefficient, yielding high and consistent values. In addition, coefficients such as McDonald's Omega, ordinal Omega, Guttman and Spearman Brown have been used, all reflecting a value above .70 and internal consistency in the measurements. In synthesis, instruments such as the RCS, SRCS, RPCS, SPRDS, EAHIF, AHABI, ERL, self-perception questionnaires and rubrics have proven to be effective tools in the assessment and development of research skills. In that sense, these scales can improve the assessment and development of research skills in university students, and it is expected that future research will use them to evaluate pedagogical approaches and international contexts.
|
| author |
Tapullima-Mori, Calixto Livia Segovia, José Pizzán Tomanguillo, Nieves del Pilar Pizzán Tomanguillo, Sandra Lucero Iñipe Cachay, Milagros Saenz Chisquipama, Astrid Irene Gómez Sangama, Fiorella |
| author_facet |
Tapullima-Mori, Calixto Livia Segovia, José Pizzán Tomanguillo, Nieves del Pilar Pizzán Tomanguillo, Sandra Lucero Iñipe Cachay, Milagros Saenz Chisquipama, Astrid Irene Gómez Sangama, Fiorella |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Competencias investigativas Validez Confiabilidad Psicometría Revisión sistemática |
| topic |
Competencias investigativas Validez Confiabilidad Psicometría Revisión sistemática Research skills Validity Reliability Psychometrics Systematic review |
| topic_facet |
Competencias investigativas Validez Confiabilidad Psicometría Revisión sistemática Research skills Validity Reliability Psychometrics Systematic review |
| citationvolume |
11 |
| citationissue |
3 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 3 , Año 2023 : Setiembre - Diciembre |
| publisher |
Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú. |
| ispartofjournal |
Propósitos y Representaciones |
| source |
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1868 |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Calixto Tapullima-Mori, José Livia Segovia, Nieves del Pilar Pizzán Tomanguillo, Sandra Lucero Pizzán Tomanguillo, Milagros Iñipe Cachay, Astrid Irene Saenz Chisquipama, Fiorella Gómez Sangama - 2023 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references |
Alavi, M., Hunt, G. E., Thapa, D. K., & Cleary, M. (2022). Conducting Systematic Reviews of the Quality and Psychometric Properties of Health-Related Measurement Instruments: Finding the Right Tool for the Job. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 43(4), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2021.1978599 Aliaga-Pacora, A. A., Juárez-Hernández, L. G., & Herrera-Meza, R. (2021). Diseño y validez de contenido de una rúbrica analítica socioformativa para evaluar competencias investigativas en posgrado. Apuntes Universitarios, 11(2), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i2.632 Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2019). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066 Andrade, C. (2021). The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(1), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000 Barrios, E., & Ulises, D. (2020). Diseño y validación del cuestionario “Actitud hacia la investigación en estudiantes universitarios”. Revista Innova Educación, 2(2), 280–302. https://doi.org/10.35622/j.rie.2020.02.004 Böttcher-Oschmann, F., Groß, J., & Thiel, F. (2019). Validierung eines Fragenbogens zur Erfassung studentischer Forschungskompetenzen über Selbsteinschätzungen – Ein Instrument zur Evaluation forschungsorientierter Lehr-Lernarrangements. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 47(4), 495–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-019-00053-8 Bracho, M. S., Fernández, M., y Díaz, J. (2021). Técnicas e instrumentos de recolección de información: Análisis y procesamiento realizado por el investigador cualitativo. Revista Científica UISRAEL, 8(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.35290/rcui.v8n1.2021.400 Buntins, K., Kerres, M., & Heinemann, A. (2021). A scoping review of research instruments for measuring student engagement: In need for convergence. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100099 Castellanos, Y. A., & Rios-González, C. M. (2017). The importance of scientific research in higher education. Medicina Universitaria, 19(74), 19–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmu.2016.11.002 Castro-Rodríguez, Y. (2021). Systematic review of the instruments for measuring research skills in higher medical education. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas, 20(2), 1–14. https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDARTICULO=108609 Castro-Rodríguez, Y. A. (2023). Marco de referencia de las competencias investigativas para la Educación Médica. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, 34(0). https://acimed.sld.cu/index.php/acimed/article/view/2190 Cater, M., Ferstel, S. D., & O’Neil, C. E. (2016). Psychometric Properties of the Inventory of Student Experiences in Undergraduate Research. The Journal of General Education, 65(3–4), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.5325/jgeneeduc.65.3-4.0283 Charumbira, M. Y., Berner, K., & Louw, Q. A. (2021). Research competencies for undergraduate rehabilitation students: A scoping review. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 13(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.7196/AJHPE.2021.v13i1.1229 Chen, Q., Huang, C., Castro, A. R., & Tang, S. (2021). Instruments for measuring nursing research competence: A protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open, 11(2), e042325. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042325 Cobos, F., Peñaherrera, M., & Ortiz, A. M. (2016). Validation of a questionnaire on research-based learning with engineering students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.227 Cota, L. V., & Beltran-Sanchez, J. A. (2021). Propiedades métricas de cuatro subescalas para medir la competencia investigativa de docentes universitarios mexicanos. Innovación Educativa, 21(85), 1. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8868985 da Silva, F. C., Gonçalves, E., Arancibia, B. A. V., Bento, G. G., Castro, T. L. da S., Hernandez, S. S. S., & da Silva, R. (2015). Estimators of internal consistency in health research: The use of the alpha coefficient. Revista Peruana De Medicina Experimental Y Salud Publica, 32(1), 129–138. http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/rins/v32n1/a19v32n1.pdf da Silva, R. C., Ribeiro, M. D., Pereira, W., & Mollo, W. R. (2023). Mentoring in research: Development of competencies for health professionals. BMC Nursing, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01411-9 Duru, P., & Örsal, Ö. (2021). Development of the Scientific Research Competency Scale for nurses. Journal of Research in Nursing, 26(7), 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871211020061 Echevarría-Guanilo, M. E., Gonçalves, N., & Romanoski, P. J. (2019). Psychometric Properties of Measurement Instruments: Conceptual Basis and Evaluation Methods - Part Ii. Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem, 28. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/714/71465278102/html/ Escobedo, M. T., Hernández, J. A., Estebané, V., & Martínez, G. (2016). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales: Características, fases, construcción, aplicación y resultados. Ciencia & trabajo, 18(55), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-24492016000100004 García-González, J. R., & Sánchez-Sánchez, P. A. (2020). Diseño teórico de la investigación: Instrucciones metodológicas para el desarrollo de propuestas y proyectos de investigación científica. Información tecnológica, 31(6), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642020000600159 García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 23, e28600–e28600. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600 Gess, C., Geiger, C., & Ziegler, M. (2019). Social-Scientific Research Competency. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(5), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000451 Gros, S., Canet-Vélez, O., Contreras-Higuera, W., Garcia-Expósito, J., Torralbas-Ortega, J., & Roca, J. (2022). Translation, Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the Spanish Version of the Attitudes towards Research and Development within Nursing Questionnaire. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), 4623. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084623 Groß, J., Wolf, R., Schladitz, S., & Wirtz, M. (2017). Assessment of educational research literacy in higher education: Construct validation of the factorial structure of an assessment instrument comparing different treatments of omitted responses. Journal for Educational Research Online, 9(2), 37–68. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-148962 Guerrero-Narbajo, Y., Rosario-Quiroz, F., & Santos-Morocho, J. (2023). Diseño y validación de la Escala de Autoevaluación de Habilidades para la Investigación Formativa (EAHIF) en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Cubana de Educación Superior, 42(2), 139–155. https://revistas.uh.cu/rces/article/view/6920 Hernández, C. A., Gamboa, A. A., & Avendaño, W. R. (2021). Validación de una escala para evaluar competencias investigativas en docente de básica y media. Revista Boletín Redipe, 10(6), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.36260/rbr.v10i6.1335 Hernández, R. M., Saavedra-López, M. A., Calle-Ramirez, X. M., & Rodríguez-Fuentes, A. (2021). Index of Undergraduate Students’ Attitude towards Scientific Research: A Study in Peru and Spain. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30480 Howard, A., & Michael, P. G. (2019). Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Attitudes Toward Research Scale in a Graduate Student Sample. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719842695 Ianni, P. A., Samuels, E. M., Eakin, B. L., Perorazio, T. E., & Ellingrod, V. L. (2021). Assessments of Research Competencies for Clinical Investigators: A Systematic Review. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 44(3), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278719896392 Ipanaqué-Zapata, M., Figueroa-Quiñones, J., Bazalar-Palacios, J., Arhuis-Inca, W., Quiñones-Negrete, M., & Villarreal-Zegarra, D. (2023). Research skills for university students’ thesis in E-learning: Scale development and validation in Peru. Heliyon, 9(3), e13770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13770 Jager, J., Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2017). More than Just Convenient: The Scientific Merits of Homogeneous Convenience Samples. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 82(2), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12296 Jeréz, I. E. H., Laza, O. U., Martorell, L. de la C. M., & Hernández, L. L. (2022). Habilidades investigativas de los licenciados en enfermería en el Instituto de Hematología e Inmunología. Revista Cubana de Hematología, Inmunología y Hemoterapia, 38(4). https://revhematologia.sld.cu/index.php/hih/article/view/1706 Kaur, R., Hakim, J., Jeremy, R., Coorey, G., Kalman, E., Jenkin, R., Bowen, D. G., & Hart, J. (2023). Students’ perceived research skills development and satisfaction after completion of a mandatory research project: Results from five cohorts of the Sydney medical program. BMC Medical Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04475-y Madadizadeh, F., & Bahariniya, S. (2023). Tutorial on how to calculating content validity of scales in medical research. Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management, 31, 100315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2023.100315 Mallidou, A. A., Borycki, E., Frisch, N., & Young, L. (2018). Research Competencies Assessment Instrument for Nurses: Preliminary Psychometric Properties. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 26(3), E159–E182. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.26.3.E159 Maric, D., Fore, G. A., Nyarko, S. C., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2023). Measurement in STEM education research: A systematic literature review of trends in the psychometric evidence of scales. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00430-x McKechnie, D., & Fisher, M. J. (2022). Considerations when examining the psychometric properties of measurement instruments used in health. AJAN - The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.37464/2020.392.481 Merino-Soto, C., Fernández-Arata, M., Fuentes-Balderrama, J., Chans, G. M., & Toledano-Toledano, F. (2022). Research Perceived Competency Scale: A New Psychometric Adaptation for University Students’ Research Learning. Sustainability, 14(19), 12036. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912036 Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-22 Newman, I., Lim, J., & Pineda, F. (2013). Content Validity Using a Mixed Methods Approach: Its Application and Development Through the Use of a Table of Specifications Methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813476922 Nolazco-Labajos, F. A., Guerrero, M. A., Carhuancho-Mendoza, I. M., & Saravia, G. del P. (2022). Competencia investigativa estudiantil durante la pandemia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, XXVIII(6), 228–243. https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/rcs/article/view/38834 Oviedo, H. C., & Campo-Arias, A. (2005). Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 34(4), 572–580. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0034-74502005000400009&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Alonso-Fernández, S. (2021). Declaración PRISMA 2020: Una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista Española de Cardiología, 74(9), 790–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016 Qiu, C., Feng, X., Reinhardt, J. D., & Li, J. (2019). Development and psychometric testing of the Research Competency Scale for Nursing Students: An instrument design study. Nurse Education Today, 79, 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.039 Ranganathan, P., & Aggarwal, R. (2020). Study designs: Part 7 – Systematic reviews. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 11(2), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_84_20 Roberts, L. D., & Povee, K. (2014). A brief measure of attitudes toward mixed methods research in psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01312 Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2018). The development and validation of the scholar–practitioner research development scale for students enrolled in professional doctoral programs. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 10(4), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2018-0011 Rodríguez, A., Caurcel, M. J., Gallardo, C. del P., & García, A. (2023). Reconocimiento y actitud hacia la investigación educativa en la Universidad. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado. Continuación de la antigua Revista de Escuelas Normales, 98(37.1). https://doi.org/10.47553/rifop.v98i37.1.97824 Smith, S. E., Newsome, A. S., Hawkins, W. A., Bland, C. M., & Branan, T. N. (2020). Teaching research skills to student pharmacists: A multi-campus, multi-semester applied critical care research elective. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 12(6), 735–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.01.020 Swank, J. M., & Lambie, G. W. (2016). Development of the Research Competencies Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175615625749 Toro, R., Peña-Sarmiento, M., Avendaño-Prieto, B. L., Mejía-Vélez, S., & Bernal-Torres, A. (2022). Análisis Empírico del Coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach según Opciones de Respuesta, Muestra y Observaciones Atípicas. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 63(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP63.2.02 Torres, S. A., & Manchego, J. L. (2023). Research competencies in Ibero-American university students: A systematic review. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(1), 2784–2802. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i1.454 Tuononen, T., & Parpala, A. (2021). The role of academic competences and learning processes in predicting Bachelor’s and Master’s thesis grades. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101001 Valderrama, M. W., Pérez, C. L., Llaque, G., & Matute, J. C. (2022). Investigative skills in university students. A systematic review. LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2022.1.1.127 Ventura-León, J., & Peña-Calero, B. N. (2020). El mundo no debería girar alrededor del alfa de Cronbach ≥ ,70. Adicciones, 33(4), 369–372. https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1576 Vieno, K., Rogers, K. A., & Campbell, N. (2022). Broadening the Definition of ‘Research Skills’ to Enhance Students’ Competence across Undergraduate and Master’s Programs. Education Sciences, 12(10), 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100642 Xiao, L., & Hau, K.T. (2022). Performance of Coefficient Alpha and Its Alternatives: Effects of Different Types of Non-Normality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 83(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644221088240 Zakariya, Y. F. (2022). Cronbach’s alpha in mathematics education research: Its appropriateness, overuse, and alternatives in estimating scale reliability. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074430 Zangaro, G. A. (2019). Importance of Reporting Psychometric Properties of Instruments Used in Nursing Research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 41(11), 1548–1550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919866827 |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2023-12-31 |
| date_accessioned |
2023-12-31T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2023-12-31T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1868 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2023.v11n3.1868 |
| issn |
2307-7999 |
| eissn |
2310-4635 |
| doi |
10.20511/pyr2023.v11n3.1868 |
| citationstartpage |
e1868 |
| citationendpage |
e1868 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/download/1868/1841 https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/download/1868/1848 |
| url4_str_mv |
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/download/1868/1864 https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/download/1868/1865 |
| _version_ |
1811200521306898432 |