Titulo:

Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática
.

Sumario:

La pandemia del COVID-19 aceleró la adopción de métodos de enseñanza virtuales e híbridos, provocando cambios sustanciales en los enfoques educativos. Este estudio se centró en evaluar el efecto de las tecnologías mediadoras en los procesos educativos posteriores a la pandemia, subrayando su rol esencial en mejorar la interacción y cooperación entre docentes y estudiantes. Aunque su relevancia es evidente, persisten desafíos en cuanto al acceso, la calidad y la evaluación de las iniciativas educativas tecnológicas. Para enfrentar estos retos, se ejecutó una revisión literaria, examinando 26 estudios académicos internacionales publicados en los últimos cinco años. Los hallazgos indican que las tecnologías mediadoras influyen positivamente en... Ver más

Guardado en:

2307-7999

2310-4635

12

2024-01-01

e1958

e1958

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Propósitos y Representaciones - 2024

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

id metarevistapublica_usil_propositosyrepresentaciones_48-article-1958
record_format ojs
spelling Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática
Lenkaitis, C. A. (2020). Technology as a mediating tool: videoconferencing, L2 learning, and learner autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1572018
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2015). Declaración de Incheon y marco de acción para la realización del objetivo de desarrollo sostenible 4. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656_spa
Muñoz, H. A. (2016). Mediaciones tecnológicas: Nuevos escenarios de la práctica pedagógica. Praxis & Saber, 7(13), 199–221. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/prasa/v7n13/v7n13a10.pdf
Ministerio de Educación Nacional de Colombia & Centro Regional para el Fomento del Libro en América Latina y el Caribe. (2022). Más y mejores aprendizajes: Política pública de recursos educativos. MEN-CERLALC.
Meier, E. B. (2021). Designing and using digital platforms for 21st century learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 217–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09880-4
Maziriri, E. T., Gapa, P., & Chuchu, T. (2020). Student perceptions towards the use of youtube as an educational tool for learning and tutorials. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1329a
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2023). Designing Online Learning in Higher Education. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (pp. 1217–1236). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6
Marks, B., & Thomas, J. (2022). Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 1287–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10653-6
Marcelo, C., & Yot-Domínguez, C. (2019). From chalk to keyboard in higher education classrooms: changes and coherence when integrating technological knowledge into pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(7), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1429584
Makruf, I., Rifa’i, A. A., & Triana, Y. (2022). Moodle-based online learning management in higher education. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1518a
López-Tocón, I. (2021). Moodle quizzes as a continuous assessment in higher education: An exploratory approach in physical chemistry. Education Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090500
Liu, Z. Y., Lomovtseva, N., & Korobeynikova, E. (2020). Online learning platforms: Reconstructing modern higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(13), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i13.14645
Kouser, S., & Majid, I. (2021). Technological tools for enhancing teaching and learning process. Towards Excellence: An Indexed, Refereed & Peer Reviewed. Journal of Higher Education, 13(1), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.37867/te130133
Paetsch, J., Franz, S., & Wolter, I. (2023). Changes in early career teachers’ technology use for teaching: The roles of teacher self-efficacy, ICT literacy, and experience during COVID-19 school closure. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104318
Khalid, M., Hossain, M. S., & Gregory, S. (2023). Contextual variation on teachers’ conceptions of ICT-enhanced teaching in engineering education. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14531
Kamali, A., Yavuz, T., & Tabak, H. (2022). Learning mediation via Web 2.0 tools in the context of school health and safety. Research in Pedagogy, 12(1), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2201127k
Jie, Z., & Sunze, Y. (2022). A mobile pedagogical framework for enhancing online teaching and learning in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2039945
Jara, I. (2015). Infraestructura digital para educación: avances y desafíos para Latinoamérica. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000371044
Hussaeni, S., Pratama, H., Arifin, R. A., Winda, A., & Widianingsih, S. (2020). The Use of YouTube as a Learning Tool in Teaching Listening Skill. International Journal of Global Operations Research, 1(3), 123–129. http://www.iorajournal.org/index.php/ijgor/article/view/50/57
Horst, S. O., & Hitters, E. (2020). Digital media entrepreneurship: implications for strategic identity work and knowledge sharing of beginning entrepreneurs. Nordic Journal of Media Management Issue, 1(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.5278/njmm.2597-0445.3612
Hidayat-ur-Rehman, I., Akram, M. S., Malik, A., Mokhtar, S. A., Bhatti, Z. A., & Khan, M. A. (2020). Exploring the determinants of digital content adoption by academics: the moderating role of environmental concerns and price value. SAGE Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020931856
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Habib, M. (2023). Digital transformation strategy for developing higher education in conflict-affected societies. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100627
Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2019). Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems. Systematic Reviews, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1089-2
Frango, I., Casali, A., Morales, A. V., Silva, A., Collazos, C. A., Cechinel, C., Muñoz-Arteaga, J., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Chacón Rivas, M., Motz, R., Rodés, V., & Ochoa, X. (2021). Iguales en las diferencias: iniciativas de investigación transnacionales sobre Informática Educativa en Latinoamérica en el periodo 2010-2020. Revista Brasileira de Informática Na Educação, 29, 1060–1090.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2021). Estrategia de la UNESCO sobre la innovación tecnológica en la educación (2022-2025). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378847_spa
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista Española de Cardiología, 74(9), 790–799. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
España-Delgado, J. A. (2023). Kahoot, Quizizz, and Quizalize in the English Class and their Impact on Motivation. HOW, 30(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.30.1.641
Wagiran, W., Suharjana, S., Nurtanto, M., & Mutohhari, F. (2022). Determining the e-learning readiness of higher education students: A study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11160
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Whitworth, K., Donnellan-Fernandez, R., & Fleet, J. A. (2023). Digital transformation of antenatal education: A descriptive exploratory study of women’s experiences of online antenatal education. Women and Birth. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2023.08.008
West, R. E. (2023). Introduction to Design, Delivery, and Assessment in ODDE. In Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (pp. 1149–1158). Springer.
Vieira, C. R., & Pedro, N. (2023). Weaknesses of ICT integration in the initial teacher education curriculum. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100150
Pardamean, B., Suparyanto, T., Cenggoro, T. W., Sudigyo, D., & Anugrahana, A. (2022). AI-Based Learning Style Prediction in Online Learning for Primary Education. IEEE Access, 10, 35725–35735. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3160177
Vandeyar, T. (2020). The academic turn: Social media in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5617–5635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10240-1
Uman, L. S. (2011). Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 20(1), 57–59. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024725/
Turgut, Y. E., & Aslan, A. (2021). Factors affecting ICT integration in TURKISH education: a systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4069–4092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10441-2
Tseng, H., Yi, X., & Cunningham, B. J. (2022). Learning technology acceptance and continuance intention among business students: The mediating effects of confirmation, flow, and engagement. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 70–86.
Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2020). Collaboration and fuzzy-modeled personalization for mobile game-based learning in higher education. Computers and Education, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103698
Stevens, G. J., Bienz, T., Wali, N., Condie, J., & Schismenos, S. (2021). Online university education is the new normal: ¿but is face-to-face better? Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0181/FULL/PDF
Shurygin, V., Berestova, A., Litvinova, T., Kolpak, E., & Nureyeva, A. (2021). Universal models and platforms in E-Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(9), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i09.19697
Samoylenko, N., Zharko, L., & Glotova, A. (2022). Designing online learning environment: Ict tools and teaching strategies. Athens Journal of Education, 9(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.30958/AJE.9-1-4
Ramírez, M., Cortés, E., & Díaz, A. (2020). Technopedagogical mediation strategies in virtual learning environments. Apertura, 12(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.32870/Ap.v12n2.1875
Quispe, A. M., Hinojosa-Ticona, Y., Miranda, H. A., & Sedano, C. A. (2021). Serie de redacción científica: Revisiones sistemáticas. Revista del Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo, 14(1), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.35434/rcmhnaaa.2021.141.906
Pozo, J. I., Pérez, M. P., Casas-Mas, A., López-Íñiguez, G., Cabellos, B., Méndez, E., Torrado, J. A., & Baño, L. (2022). Teaching and learning musical instruments through ICT: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Heliyon, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08761
Pirela, J., Pérez, L. E., & Pardo, L. E. (2022). Tendencias y retos de la formación docente en Iberoamérica. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 28(4), 315–334. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8703847
Fansury, A. H., Januarty, R., Rahman, A. W., & Syawal, S. (2020). Digital Content for Millennial Generations: Teaching the English Foreign Language Learner on COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55(3). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.3.40
Ergüzen, A., Erdal, E., Ünver, M., & Özcan, A. (2021). Improving technological infrastructure of distance education through trustworthy platform‐independent virtual software application pools. Applied Sciences, 11(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031214
Eichen, L., Hackl-Wimmer, S., Eglmaier, M. T. W., Lackner, H. K., Paechter, M., Rettenbacher, K., Rominger, C., & Walter-Laager, C. (2021). Families’ digital media use: Intentions, rules and activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2162–2177. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.13161
Artículo de revista
Propósitos y Representaciones - 2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Español
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1958
Propósitos y Representaciones
Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú.
application/pdf
, Año 2024 : Enero - Diciembre
Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Kosnin, A. B. M., & Darwish, M. (2020). Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z
12
educación virtual
Educación tecnológica
Procesos de aprendizaje
Procesos de enseñanza
Mediación tecnológica
Navarro, Rafael Cecilio
La pandemia del COVID-19 aceleró la adopción de métodos de enseñanza virtuales e híbridos, provocando cambios sustanciales en los enfoques educativos. Este estudio se centró en evaluar el efecto de las tecnologías mediadoras en los procesos educativos posteriores a la pandemia, subrayando su rol esencial en mejorar la interacción y cooperación entre docentes y estudiantes. Aunque su relevancia es evidente, persisten desafíos en cuanto al acceso, la calidad y la evaluación de las iniciativas educativas tecnológicas. Para enfrentar estos retos, se ejecutó una revisión literaria, examinando 26 estudios académicos internacionales publicados en los últimos cinco años. Los hallazgos indican que las tecnologías mediadoras influyen positivamente en la motivación, la retención de estudiantes y el aprendizaje autodirigido, especialmente en la educación superior y la enseñanza de idiomas. Sin embargo, los efectos varían según el contexto. Se recomienda una estrategia de implementación tecnológica en el aula que potencie los aprendizajes y apoye una formación integral, resaltando la importancia de desarrollar programas integrales de planificación, ejecución y evaluación de tecnologías educativas antes de aplicar estos hallazgos en contextos específicos como el colombiano.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Publication
Acar, A., & Kayaoglu, M. N. (2020). Moodle as a potential tool for language education under the shadow of covid-19. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2020(90), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.90.4
Baldwin, S. J., & Ching, Y. H. (2020). Guidelines for Designing Online Courses for Mobile Devices. TechTrends, 64(3), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00463-6
Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2023). Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: a systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1373–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11243-w
Barnes, S. J. (2020). Information management research and practice in the post-COVID-19 world. International Journal of Information Management, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102175
Barfi, K. A., Arkorful, V., Appiah, F., Agyapong, E. M., & Acheampong, E. (2023). The impact of blended learning on students using the IBOX platform: Initial perspectives of teachers. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14297
Adzovie, D., & Jibril, A. B. (2022). Assessment of the effects of Covid-19 pandemic on the prospects of e-learning in higher learning institutions: The mediating role of academic innovativeness and technological growth. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2041222
Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
Chaiyo, Y., & Nokham, R. (2017). The Effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google forms on the Student’s Perception in the Classrooms Response System. 2017 International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAMT.2017.7904957
Banco Mundial. (2023). Personas que usan Internet (% de la población). Banco Mundial. https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/IT.NET.USER.ZS?end=2022&name_desc=false&start=1960&view=chart
Balladares-Burgos, J., & Valverde-Berrocoso, J. (2022). El modelo tecnopedagógico TPACK y su incidencia en la formación docente: una revisión de la literatura. RECIE. Revista Caribeña de Investigación Educativa, 6(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.32541/recie.2022.v6i1.pp63-72
Crisol-Moya, E., Herrera-Nieves, L., & Montes-Soldado, R. (2020). Virtual education for all: Systematic review. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.20327
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 844–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13233
Baber, H. (2021). Modelling the acceptance of e-learning during the pandemic of COVID-19-A study of South Korea. International Journal of Management Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100503
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance on information technology- System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022
Departamento Administrativo de la Función Pública. (2020). Decreto 1419 de 2020: Por el cual se subroga la sección 1 del capítulo 2 del título 6 de la parte 2 del libro 2 del Decreto 1078 de 2015, Decreto Único Reglamentario del Sector de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones. Diario Oficial de Colombia. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma_pdf.php?i=144825
Australian Government Department of Education. (2023, February 9). Completion rates of higher education students - Cohort analysis, 2005-2021. Australian Government Department of Education. https://www.education.gov.au/higher-education-statistics/resources/completion-rates-higher-education-students-cohort-analysis-20052021
Al-Daihani, S. M., Al-Qallaf, J. S., & AlSaheeb, S. A. (2018). Use of social media by social science academics for scholarly communication. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 67(6–7), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-11-2017-0091
Aldahdouh, T. Z., Nokelainen, P., & Korhonen, V. (2020). Technology and Social Media Usage in Higher Education: The Influence of Individual Innovativeness. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899441
Afonso, J. S., Martins, P. S., Barbosa, G. F., Ferreira, L., & Girao, M. J. B. C. (2018). Pedagogical mediation using the virtual learning environment and the new generation: A search for improved performance in medical education. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 6(3), 115–122.
Dianati, S., Nguyen, M., Dao, P., Iwashita, N., & Vasquez, C. (2020). Student perceptions of technological tools for flipped instruction: The case of Padlet, ¡Kahoot!, and Cirrus. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(5). https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol17/iss5/4
Learning processes
Technological mediation
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of virtual and hybrid teaching methods, leading to substantial changes in educational approaches. This study focused on evaluating the effect of mediating technologies on post-pandemic educational processes, emphasizing their essential role in enhancing interaction and cooperation between teachers and students. Although their relevance is evident, challenges persist in terms of access, quality, and evaluation of technological educational initiatives. To address these challenges, a comprehensive literature review was conducted, examining 26 international academic studies published in the last five years. The findings indicate that mediating technologies positively influence motivation, student retention, and self-directed learning, especially in higher education and language teaching. However, the effects vary depending on the context. It is recommended to implement a technological strategy in the classroom that enhances learning and supports holistic education, highlighting the importance of developing comprehensive programs for planning, execution, and evaluation of educational technologies before applying these findings in specific contexts like Colombia.
Teaching processes
Journal article
Technological education
Virtual education
Technological Infrastructure In Teaching-Learning Processes In Educational Institutions: A Systematic Review
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/download/1958/1900
2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
2024-01-01
2307-7999
2310-4635
10.20511/pyr2024.v12.1958
e1958
e1958
https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2024.v12.1958
institution UNIVERSIDAD SAN IGNACIO DE LOYOLA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/USIL/logo.png
country_str Perú
collection Propósitos y Representaciones
title Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática
spellingShingle Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática
Navarro, Rafael Cecilio
educación virtual
Educación tecnológica
Procesos de aprendizaje
Procesos de enseñanza
Mediación tecnológica
Learning processes
Technological mediation
Teaching processes
Technological education
Virtual education
title_short Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática
title_full Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática
title_fullStr Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática
title_full_unstemmed Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática
title_sort infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática
title_eng Technological Infrastructure In Teaching-Learning Processes In Educational Institutions: A Systematic Review
description La pandemia del COVID-19 aceleró la adopción de métodos de enseñanza virtuales e híbridos, provocando cambios sustanciales en los enfoques educativos. Este estudio se centró en evaluar el efecto de las tecnologías mediadoras en los procesos educativos posteriores a la pandemia, subrayando su rol esencial en mejorar la interacción y cooperación entre docentes y estudiantes. Aunque su relevancia es evidente, persisten desafíos en cuanto al acceso, la calidad y la evaluación de las iniciativas educativas tecnológicas. Para enfrentar estos retos, se ejecutó una revisión literaria, examinando 26 estudios académicos internacionales publicados en los últimos cinco años. Los hallazgos indican que las tecnologías mediadoras influyen positivamente en la motivación, la retención de estudiantes y el aprendizaje autodirigido, especialmente en la educación superior y la enseñanza de idiomas. Sin embargo, los efectos varían según el contexto. Se recomienda una estrategia de implementación tecnológica en el aula que potencie los aprendizajes y apoye una formación integral, resaltando la importancia de desarrollar programas integrales de planificación, ejecución y evaluación de tecnologías educativas antes de aplicar estos hallazgos en contextos específicos como el colombiano.
description_eng The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of virtual and hybrid teaching methods, leading to substantial changes in educational approaches. This study focused on evaluating the effect of mediating technologies on post-pandemic educational processes, emphasizing their essential role in enhancing interaction and cooperation between teachers and students. Although their relevance is evident, challenges persist in terms of access, quality, and evaluation of technological educational initiatives. To address these challenges, a comprehensive literature review was conducted, examining 26 international academic studies published in the last five years. The findings indicate that mediating technologies positively influence motivation, student retention, and self-directed learning, especially in higher education and language teaching. However, the effects vary depending on the context. It is recommended to implement a technological strategy in the classroom that enhances learning and supports holistic education, highlighting the importance of developing comprehensive programs for planning, execution, and evaluation of educational technologies before applying these findings in specific contexts like Colombia.
author Navarro, Rafael Cecilio
author_facet Navarro, Rafael Cecilio
topicspa_str_mv educación virtual
Educación tecnológica
Procesos de aprendizaje
Procesos de enseñanza
Mediación tecnológica
topic educación virtual
Educación tecnológica
Procesos de aprendizaje
Procesos de enseñanza
Mediación tecnológica
Learning processes
Technological mediation
Teaching processes
Technological education
Virtual education
topic_facet educación virtual
Educación tecnológica
Procesos de aprendizaje
Procesos de enseñanza
Mediación tecnológica
Learning processes
Technological mediation
Teaching processes
Technological education
Virtual education
citationvolume 12
citationedition , Año 2024 : Enero - Diciembre
publisher Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú.
ispartofjournal Propósitos y Representaciones
source https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1958
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Propósitos y Representaciones - 2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
references Lenkaitis, C. A. (2020). Technology as a mediating tool: videoconferencing, L2 learning, and learner autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1572018
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2015). Declaración de Incheon y marco de acción para la realización del objetivo de desarrollo sostenible 4. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656_spa
Muñoz, H. A. (2016). Mediaciones tecnológicas: Nuevos escenarios de la práctica pedagógica. Praxis & Saber, 7(13), 199–221. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/prasa/v7n13/v7n13a10.pdf
Ministerio de Educación Nacional de Colombia & Centro Regional para el Fomento del Libro en América Latina y el Caribe. (2022). Más y mejores aprendizajes: Política pública de recursos educativos. MEN-CERLALC.
Meier, E. B. (2021). Designing and using digital platforms for 21st century learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 217–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09880-4
Maziriri, E. T., Gapa, P., & Chuchu, T. (2020). Student perceptions towards the use of youtube as an educational tool for learning and tutorials. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1329a
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2023). Designing Online Learning in Higher Education. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (pp. 1217–1236). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6
Marks, B., & Thomas, J. (2022). Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 1287–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10653-6
Marcelo, C., & Yot-Domínguez, C. (2019). From chalk to keyboard in higher education classrooms: changes and coherence when integrating technological knowledge into pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(7), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1429584
Makruf, I., Rifa’i, A. A., & Triana, Y. (2022). Moodle-based online learning management in higher education. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1518a
López-Tocón, I. (2021). Moodle quizzes as a continuous assessment in higher education: An exploratory approach in physical chemistry. Education Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090500
Liu, Z. Y., Lomovtseva, N., & Korobeynikova, E. (2020). Online learning platforms: Reconstructing modern higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(13), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i13.14645
Kouser, S., & Majid, I. (2021). Technological tools for enhancing teaching and learning process. Towards Excellence: An Indexed, Refereed & Peer Reviewed. Journal of Higher Education, 13(1), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.37867/te130133
Paetsch, J., Franz, S., & Wolter, I. (2023). Changes in early career teachers’ technology use for teaching: The roles of teacher self-efficacy, ICT literacy, and experience during COVID-19 school closure. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104318
Khalid, M., Hossain, M. S., & Gregory, S. (2023). Contextual variation on teachers’ conceptions of ICT-enhanced teaching in engineering education. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14531
Kamali, A., Yavuz, T., & Tabak, H. (2022). Learning mediation via Web 2.0 tools in the context of school health and safety. Research in Pedagogy, 12(1), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2201127k
Jie, Z., & Sunze, Y. (2022). A mobile pedagogical framework for enhancing online teaching and learning in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2039945
Jara, I. (2015). Infraestructura digital para educación: avances y desafíos para Latinoamérica. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000371044
Hussaeni, S., Pratama, H., Arifin, R. A., Winda, A., & Widianingsih, S. (2020). The Use of YouTube as a Learning Tool in Teaching Listening Skill. International Journal of Global Operations Research, 1(3), 123–129. http://www.iorajournal.org/index.php/ijgor/article/view/50/57
Horst, S. O., & Hitters, E. (2020). Digital media entrepreneurship: implications for strategic identity work and knowledge sharing of beginning entrepreneurs. Nordic Journal of Media Management Issue, 1(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.5278/njmm.2597-0445.3612
Hidayat-ur-Rehman, I., Akram, M. S., Malik, A., Mokhtar, S. A., Bhatti, Z. A., & Khan, M. A. (2020). Exploring the determinants of digital content adoption by academics: the moderating role of environmental concerns and price value. SAGE Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020931856
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Habib, M. (2023). Digital transformation strategy for developing higher education in conflict-affected societies. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100627
Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2019). Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems. Systematic Reviews, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1089-2
Frango, I., Casali, A., Morales, A. V., Silva, A., Collazos, C. A., Cechinel, C., Muñoz-Arteaga, J., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Chacón Rivas, M., Motz, R., Rodés, V., & Ochoa, X. (2021). Iguales en las diferencias: iniciativas de investigación transnacionales sobre Informática Educativa en Latinoamérica en el periodo 2010-2020. Revista Brasileira de Informática Na Educação, 29, 1060–1090.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2021). Estrategia de la UNESCO sobre la innovación tecnológica en la educación (2022-2025). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378847_spa
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista Española de Cardiología, 74(9), 790–799. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
España-Delgado, J. A. (2023). Kahoot, Quizizz, and Quizalize in the English Class and their Impact on Motivation. HOW, 30(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.30.1.641
Wagiran, W., Suharjana, S., Nurtanto, M., & Mutohhari, F. (2022). Determining the e-learning readiness of higher education students: A study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11160
Whitworth, K., Donnellan-Fernandez, R., & Fleet, J. A. (2023). Digital transformation of antenatal education: A descriptive exploratory study of women’s experiences of online antenatal education. Women and Birth. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2023.08.008
West, R. E. (2023). Introduction to Design, Delivery, and Assessment in ODDE. In Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (pp. 1149–1158). Springer.
Vieira, C. R., & Pedro, N. (2023). Weaknesses of ICT integration in the initial teacher education curriculum. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100150
Pardamean, B., Suparyanto, T., Cenggoro, T. W., Sudigyo, D., & Anugrahana, A. (2022). AI-Based Learning Style Prediction in Online Learning for Primary Education. IEEE Access, 10, 35725–35735. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3160177
Vandeyar, T. (2020). The academic turn: Social media in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5617–5635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10240-1
Uman, L. S. (2011). Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 20(1), 57–59. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024725/
Turgut, Y. E., & Aslan, A. (2021). Factors affecting ICT integration in TURKISH education: a systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4069–4092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10441-2
Tseng, H., Yi, X., & Cunningham, B. J. (2022). Learning technology acceptance and continuance intention among business students: The mediating effects of confirmation, flow, and engagement. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 70–86.
Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2020). Collaboration and fuzzy-modeled personalization for mobile game-based learning in higher education. Computers and Education, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103698
Stevens, G. J., Bienz, T., Wali, N., Condie, J., & Schismenos, S. (2021). Online university education is the new normal: ¿but is face-to-face better? Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0181/FULL/PDF
Shurygin, V., Berestova, A., Litvinova, T., Kolpak, E., & Nureyeva, A. (2021). Universal models and platforms in E-Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(9), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i09.19697
Samoylenko, N., Zharko, L., & Glotova, A. (2022). Designing online learning environment: Ict tools and teaching strategies. Athens Journal of Education, 9(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.30958/AJE.9-1-4
Ramírez, M., Cortés, E., & Díaz, A. (2020). Technopedagogical mediation strategies in virtual learning environments. Apertura, 12(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.32870/Ap.v12n2.1875
Quispe, A. M., Hinojosa-Ticona, Y., Miranda, H. A., & Sedano, C. A. (2021). Serie de redacción científica: Revisiones sistemáticas. Revista del Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo, 14(1), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.35434/rcmhnaaa.2021.141.906
Pozo, J. I., Pérez, M. P., Casas-Mas, A., López-Íñiguez, G., Cabellos, B., Méndez, E., Torrado, J. A., & Baño, L. (2022). Teaching and learning musical instruments through ICT: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Heliyon, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08761
Pirela, J., Pérez, L. E., & Pardo, L. E. (2022). Tendencias y retos de la formación docente en Iberoamérica. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 28(4), 315–334. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8703847
Fansury, A. H., Januarty, R., Rahman, A. W., & Syawal, S. (2020). Digital Content for Millennial Generations: Teaching the English Foreign Language Learner on COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55(3). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.3.40
Ergüzen, A., Erdal, E., Ünver, M., & Özcan, A. (2021). Improving technological infrastructure of distance education through trustworthy platform‐independent virtual software application pools. Applied Sciences, 11(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031214
Eichen, L., Hackl-Wimmer, S., Eglmaier, M. T. W., Lackner, H. K., Paechter, M., Rettenbacher, K., Rominger, C., & Walter-Laager, C. (2021). Families’ digital media use: Intentions, rules and activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2162–2177. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.13161
Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Kosnin, A. B. M., & Darwish, M. (2020). Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z
Acar, A., & Kayaoglu, M. N. (2020). Moodle as a potential tool for language education under the shadow of covid-19. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2020(90), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.90.4
Baldwin, S. J., & Ching, Y. H. (2020). Guidelines for Designing Online Courses for Mobile Devices. TechTrends, 64(3), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00463-6
Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2023). Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: a systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1373–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11243-w
Barnes, S. J. (2020). Information management research and practice in the post-COVID-19 world. International Journal of Information Management, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102175
Barfi, K. A., Arkorful, V., Appiah, F., Agyapong, E. M., & Acheampong, E. (2023). The impact of blended learning on students using the IBOX platform: Initial perspectives of teachers. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14297
Adzovie, D., & Jibril, A. B. (2022). Assessment of the effects of Covid-19 pandemic on the prospects of e-learning in higher learning institutions: The mediating role of academic innovativeness and technological growth. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2041222
Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
Chaiyo, Y., & Nokham, R. (2017). The Effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google forms on the Student’s Perception in the Classrooms Response System. 2017 International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAMT.2017.7904957
Banco Mundial. (2023). Personas que usan Internet (% de la población). Banco Mundial. https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/IT.NET.USER.ZS?end=2022&name_desc=false&start=1960&view=chart
Balladares-Burgos, J., & Valverde-Berrocoso, J. (2022). El modelo tecnopedagógico TPACK y su incidencia en la formación docente: una revisión de la literatura. RECIE. Revista Caribeña de Investigación Educativa, 6(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.32541/recie.2022.v6i1.pp63-72
Crisol-Moya, E., Herrera-Nieves, L., & Montes-Soldado, R. (2020). Virtual education for all: Systematic review. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.20327
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 844–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13233
Baber, H. (2021). Modelling the acceptance of e-learning during the pandemic of COVID-19-A study of South Korea. International Journal of Management Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100503
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance on information technology- System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022
Departamento Administrativo de la Función Pública. (2020). Decreto 1419 de 2020: Por el cual se subroga la sección 1 del capítulo 2 del título 6 de la parte 2 del libro 2 del Decreto 1078 de 2015, Decreto Único Reglamentario del Sector de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones. Diario Oficial de Colombia. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma_pdf.php?i=144825
Australian Government Department of Education. (2023, February 9). Completion rates of higher education students - Cohort analysis, 2005-2021. Australian Government Department of Education. https://www.education.gov.au/higher-education-statistics/resources/completion-rates-higher-education-students-cohort-analysis-20052021
Al-Daihani, S. M., Al-Qallaf, J. S., & AlSaheeb, S. A. (2018). Use of social media by social science academics for scholarly communication. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 67(6–7), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-11-2017-0091
Aldahdouh, T. Z., Nokelainen, P., & Korhonen, V. (2020). Technology and Social Media Usage in Higher Education: The Influence of Individual Innovativeness. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899441
Afonso, J. S., Martins, P. S., Barbosa, G. F., Ferreira, L., & Girao, M. J. B. C. (2018). Pedagogical mediation using the virtual learning environment and the new generation: A search for improved performance in medical education. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 6(3), 115–122.
Dianati, S., Nguyen, M., Dao, P., Iwashita, N., & Vasquez, C. (2020). Student perceptions of technological tools for flipped instruction: The case of Padlet, ¡Kahoot!, and Cirrus. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(5). https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol17/iss5/4
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2024-01-01
date_accessioned 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1958
url_doi https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2024.v12.1958
issn 2307-7999
eissn 2310-4635
doi 10.20511/pyr2024.v12.1958
citationstartpage e1958
citationendpage e1958
url2_str_mv https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/download/1958/1900
_version_ 1824464906143924224