Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática
.
La pandemia del COVID-19 aceleró la adopción de métodos de enseñanza virtuales e híbridos, provocando cambios sustanciales en los enfoques educativos. Este estudio se centró en evaluar el efecto de las tecnologías mediadoras en los procesos educativos posteriores a la pandemia, subrayando su rol esencial en mejorar la interacción y cooperación entre docentes y estudiantes. Aunque su relevancia es evidente, persisten desafíos en cuanto al acceso, la calidad y la evaluación de las iniciativas educativas tecnológicas. Para enfrentar estos retos, se ejecutó una revisión literaria, examinando 26 estudios académicos internacionales publicados en los últimos cinco años. Los hallazgos indican que las tecnologías mediadoras influyen positivamente en... Ver más
2307-7999
2310-4635
12
2024-01-01
e1958
e1958
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Propósitos y Representaciones - 2024
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
id |
metarevistapublica_usil_propositosyrepresentaciones_48-article-1958 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática Lenkaitis, C. A. (2020). Technology as a mediating tool: videoconferencing, L2 learning, and learner autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1572018 Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2015). Declaración de Incheon y marco de acción para la realización del objetivo de desarrollo sostenible 4. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656_spa Muñoz, H. A. (2016). Mediaciones tecnológicas: Nuevos escenarios de la práctica pedagógica. Praxis & Saber, 7(13), 199–221. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/prasa/v7n13/v7n13a10.pdf Ministerio de Educación Nacional de Colombia & Centro Regional para el Fomento del Libro en América Latina y el Caribe. (2022). Más y mejores aprendizajes: Política pública de recursos educativos. MEN-CERLALC. Meier, E. B. (2021). Designing and using digital platforms for 21st century learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 217–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09880-4 Maziriri, E. T., Gapa, P., & Chuchu, T. (2020). Student perceptions towards the use of youtube as an educational tool for learning and tutorials. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1329a Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2023). Designing Online Learning in Higher Education. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (pp. 1217–1236). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6 Marks, B., & Thomas, J. (2022). Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 1287–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10653-6 Marcelo, C., & Yot-Domínguez, C. (2019). From chalk to keyboard in higher education classrooms: changes and coherence when integrating technological knowledge into pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(7), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1429584 Makruf, I., Rifa’i, A. A., & Triana, Y. (2022). Moodle-based online learning management in higher education. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1518a López-Tocón, I. (2021). Moodle quizzes as a continuous assessment in higher education: An exploratory approach in physical chemistry. Education Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090500 Liu, Z. Y., Lomovtseva, N., & Korobeynikova, E. (2020). Online learning platforms: Reconstructing modern higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(13), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i13.14645 Kouser, S., & Majid, I. (2021). Technological tools for enhancing teaching and learning process. Towards Excellence: An Indexed, Refereed & Peer Reviewed. Journal of Higher Education, 13(1), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.37867/te130133 Paetsch, J., Franz, S., & Wolter, I. (2023). Changes in early career teachers’ technology use for teaching: The roles of teacher self-efficacy, ICT literacy, and experience during COVID-19 school closure. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104318 Khalid, M., Hossain, M. S., & Gregory, S. (2023). Contextual variation on teachers’ conceptions of ICT-enhanced teaching in engineering education. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14531 Kamali, A., Yavuz, T., & Tabak, H. (2022). Learning mediation via Web 2.0 tools in the context of school health and safety. Research in Pedagogy, 12(1), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2201127k Jie, Z., & Sunze, Y. (2022). A mobile pedagogical framework for enhancing online teaching and learning in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2039945 Jara, I. (2015). Infraestructura digital para educación: avances y desafíos para Latinoamérica. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000371044 Hussaeni, S., Pratama, H., Arifin, R. A., Winda, A., & Widianingsih, S. (2020). The Use of YouTube as a Learning Tool in Teaching Listening Skill. International Journal of Global Operations Research, 1(3), 123–129. http://www.iorajournal.org/index.php/ijgor/article/view/50/57 Horst, S. O., & Hitters, E. (2020). Digital media entrepreneurship: implications for strategic identity work and knowledge sharing of beginning entrepreneurs. Nordic Journal of Media Management Issue, 1(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.5278/njmm.2597-0445.3612 Hidayat-ur-Rehman, I., Akram, M. S., Malik, A., Mokhtar, S. A., Bhatti, Z. A., & Khan, M. A. (2020). Exploring the determinants of digital content adoption by academics: the moderating role of environmental concerns and price value. SAGE Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020931856 Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004 Habib, M. (2023). Digital transformation strategy for developing higher education in conflict-affected societies. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100627 Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2019). Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems. Systematic Reviews, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1089-2 Frango, I., Casali, A., Morales, A. V., Silva, A., Collazos, C. A., Cechinel, C., Muñoz-Arteaga, J., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Chacón Rivas, M., Motz, R., Rodés, V., & Ochoa, X. (2021). Iguales en las diferencias: iniciativas de investigación transnacionales sobre Informática Educativa en Latinoamérica en el periodo 2010-2020. Revista Brasileira de Informática Na Educação, 29, 1060–1090. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2021). Estrategia de la UNESCO sobre la innovación tecnológica en la educación (2022-2025). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378847_spa Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista Española de Cardiología, 74(9), 790–799. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 España-Delgado, J. A. (2023). Kahoot, Quizizz, and Quizalize in the English Class and their Impact on Motivation. HOW, 30(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.30.1.641 Wagiran, W., Suharjana, S., Nurtanto, M., & Mutohhari, F. (2022). Determining the e-learning readiness of higher education students: A study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11160 Text http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Whitworth, K., Donnellan-Fernandez, R., & Fleet, J. A. (2023). Digital transformation of antenatal education: A descriptive exploratory study of women’s experiences of online antenatal education. Women and Birth. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2023.08.008 West, R. E. (2023). Introduction to Design, Delivery, and Assessment in ODDE. In Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (pp. 1149–1158). Springer. Vieira, C. R., & Pedro, N. (2023). Weaknesses of ICT integration in the initial teacher education curriculum. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100150 Pardamean, B., Suparyanto, T., Cenggoro, T. W., Sudigyo, D., & Anugrahana, A. (2022). AI-Based Learning Style Prediction in Online Learning for Primary Education. IEEE Access, 10, 35725–35735. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3160177 Vandeyar, T. (2020). The academic turn: Social media in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5617–5635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10240-1 Uman, L. S. (2011). Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 20(1), 57–59. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024725/ Turgut, Y. E., & Aslan, A. (2021). Factors affecting ICT integration in TURKISH education: a systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4069–4092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10441-2 Tseng, H., Yi, X., & Cunningham, B. J. (2022). Learning technology acceptance and continuance intention among business students: The mediating effects of confirmation, flow, and engagement. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 70–86. Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2020). Collaboration and fuzzy-modeled personalization for mobile game-based learning in higher education. Computers and Education, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103698 Stevens, G. J., Bienz, T., Wali, N., Condie, J., & Schismenos, S. (2021). Online university education is the new normal: ¿but is face-to-face better? Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0181/FULL/PDF Shurygin, V., Berestova, A., Litvinova, T., Kolpak, E., & Nureyeva, A. (2021). Universal models and platforms in E-Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(9), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i09.19697 Samoylenko, N., Zharko, L., & Glotova, A. (2022). Designing online learning environment: Ict tools and teaching strategies. Athens Journal of Education, 9(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.30958/AJE.9-1-4 Ramírez, M., Cortés, E., & Díaz, A. (2020). Technopedagogical mediation strategies in virtual learning environments. Apertura, 12(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.32870/Ap.v12n2.1875 Quispe, A. M., Hinojosa-Ticona, Y., Miranda, H. A., & Sedano, C. A. (2021). Serie de redacción científica: Revisiones sistemáticas. Revista del Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo, 14(1), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.35434/rcmhnaaa.2021.141.906 Pozo, J. I., Pérez, M. P., Casas-Mas, A., López-Íñiguez, G., Cabellos, B., Méndez, E., Torrado, J. A., & Baño, L. (2022). Teaching and learning musical instruments through ICT: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Heliyon, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08761 Pirela, J., Pérez, L. E., & Pardo, L. E. (2022). Tendencias y retos de la formación docente en Iberoamérica. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 28(4), 315–334. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8703847 Fansury, A. H., Januarty, R., Rahman, A. W., & Syawal, S. (2020). Digital Content for Millennial Generations: Teaching the English Foreign Language Learner on COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55(3). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.3.40 Ergüzen, A., Erdal, E., Ünver, M., & Özcan, A. (2021). Improving technological infrastructure of distance education through trustworthy platform‐independent virtual software application pools. Applied Sciences, 11(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031214 Eichen, L., Hackl-Wimmer, S., Eglmaier, M. T. W., Lackner, H. K., Paechter, M., Rettenbacher, K., Rominger, C., & Walter-Laager, C. (2021). Families’ digital media use: Intentions, rules and activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2162–2177. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.13161 Artículo de revista Propósitos y Representaciones - 2024 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Español https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1958 Propósitos y Representaciones Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú. application/pdf , Año 2024 : Enero - Diciembre Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Kosnin, A. B. M., & Darwish, M. (2020). Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z 12 educación virtual Educación tecnológica Procesos de aprendizaje Procesos de enseñanza Mediación tecnológica Navarro, Rafael Cecilio La pandemia del COVID-19 aceleró la adopción de métodos de enseñanza virtuales e híbridos, provocando cambios sustanciales en los enfoques educativos. Este estudio se centró en evaluar el efecto de las tecnologías mediadoras en los procesos educativos posteriores a la pandemia, subrayando su rol esencial en mejorar la interacción y cooperación entre docentes y estudiantes. Aunque su relevancia es evidente, persisten desafíos en cuanto al acceso, la calidad y la evaluación de las iniciativas educativas tecnológicas. Para enfrentar estos retos, se ejecutó una revisión literaria, examinando 26 estudios académicos internacionales publicados en los últimos cinco años. Los hallazgos indican que las tecnologías mediadoras influyen positivamente en la motivación, la retención de estudiantes y el aprendizaje autodirigido, especialmente en la educación superior y la enseñanza de idiomas. Sin embargo, los efectos varían según el contexto. Se recomienda una estrategia de implementación tecnológica en el aula que potencie los aprendizajes y apoye una formación integral, resaltando la importancia de desarrollar programas integrales de planificación, ejecución y evaluación de tecnologías educativas antes de aplicar estos hallazgos en contextos específicos como el colombiano. Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0. Publication Acar, A., & Kayaoglu, M. N. (2020). Moodle as a potential tool for language education under the shadow of covid-19. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2020(90), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.90.4 Baldwin, S. J., & Ching, Y. H. (2020). Guidelines for Designing Online Courses for Mobile Devices. TechTrends, 64(3), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00463-6 Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2023). Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: a systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1373–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11243-w Barnes, S. J. (2020). Information management research and practice in the post-COVID-19 world. International Journal of Information Management, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102175 Barfi, K. A., Arkorful, V., Appiah, F., Agyapong, E. M., & Acheampong, E. (2023). The impact of blended learning on students using the IBOX platform: Initial perspectives of teachers. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14297 Adzovie, D., & Jibril, A. B. (2022). Assessment of the effects of Covid-19 pandemic on the prospects of e-learning in higher learning institutions: The mediating role of academic innovativeness and technological growth. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2041222 Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1 Chaiyo, Y., & Nokham, R. (2017). The Effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google forms on the Student’s Perception in the Classrooms Response System. 2017 International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAMT.2017.7904957 Banco Mundial. (2023). Personas que usan Internet (% de la población). Banco Mundial. https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/IT.NET.USER.ZS?end=2022&name_desc=false&start=1960&view=chart Balladares-Burgos, J., & Valverde-Berrocoso, J. (2022). El modelo tecnopedagógico TPACK y su incidencia en la formación docente: una revisión de la literatura. RECIE. Revista Caribeña de Investigación Educativa, 6(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.32541/recie.2022.v6i1.pp63-72 Crisol-Moya, E., Herrera-Nieves, L., & Montes-Soldado, R. (2020). Virtual education for all: Systematic review. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.20327 Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 844–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13233 Baber, H. (2021). Modelling the acceptance of e-learning during the pandemic of COVID-19-A study of South Korea. International Journal of Management Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100503 Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance on information technology- System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022 Departamento Administrativo de la Función Pública. (2020). Decreto 1419 de 2020: Por el cual se subroga la sección 1 del capítulo 2 del título 6 de la parte 2 del libro 2 del Decreto 1078 de 2015, Decreto Único Reglamentario del Sector de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones. Diario Oficial de Colombia. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma_pdf.php?i=144825 Australian Government Department of Education. (2023, February 9). Completion rates of higher education students - Cohort analysis, 2005-2021. Australian Government Department of Education. https://www.education.gov.au/higher-education-statistics/resources/completion-rates-higher-education-students-cohort-analysis-20052021 Al-Daihani, S. M., Al-Qallaf, J. S., & AlSaheeb, S. A. (2018). Use of social media by social science academics for scholarly communication. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 67(6–7), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-11-2017-0091 Aldahdouh, T. Z., Nokelainen, P., & Korhonen, V. (2020). Technology and Social Media Usage in Higher Education: The Influence of Individual Innovativeness. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899441 Afonso, J. S., Martins, P. S., Barbosa, G. F., Ferreira, L., & Girao, M. J. B. C. (2018). Pedagogical mediation using the virtual learning environment and the new generation: A search for improved performance in medical education. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 6(3), 115–122. Dianati, S., Nguyen, M., Dao, P., Iwashita, N., & Vasquez, C. (2020). Student perceptions of technological tools for flipped instruction: The case of Padlet, ¡Kahoot!, and Cirrus. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(5). https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol17/iss5/4 Learning processes Technological mediation The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of virtual and hybrid teaching methods, leading to substantial changes in educational approaches. This study focused on evaluating the effect of mediating technologies on post-pandemic educational processes, emphasizing their essential role in enhancing interaction and cooperation between teachers and students. Although their relevance is evident, challenges persist in terms of access, quality, and evaluation of technological educational initiatives. To address these challenges, a comprehensive literature review was conducted, examining 26 international academic studies published in the last five years. The findings indicate that mediating technologies positively influence motivation, student retention, and self-directed learning, especially in higher education and language teaching. However, the effects vary depending on the context. It is recommended to implement a technological strategy in the classroom that enhances learning and supports holistic education, highlighting the importance of developing comprehensive programs for planning, execution, and evaluation of educational technologies before applying these findings in specific contexts like Colombia. Teaching processes Journal article Technological education Virtual education Technological Infrastructure In Teaching-Learning Processes In Educational Institutions: A Systematic Review https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/download/1958/1900 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z 2024-01-01 2307-7999 2310-4635 10.20511/pyr2024.v12.1958 e1958 e1958 https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2024.v12.1958 |
institution |
UNIVERSIDAD SAN IGNACIO DE LOYOLA |
thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/USIL/logo.png |
country_str |
Perú |
collection |
Propósitos y Representaciones |
title |
Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática |
spellingShingle |
Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática Navarro, Rafael Cecilio educación virtual Educación tecnológica Procesos de aprendizaje Procesos de enseñanza Mediación tecnológica Learning processes Technological mediation Teaching processes Technological education Virtual education |
title_short |
Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática |
title_full |
Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática |
title_fullStr |
Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática |
title_full_unstemmed |
Infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática |
title_sort |
infraestructura tecnológica en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en instituciones educativas: una revisión sistemática |
title_eng |
Technological Infrastructure In Teaching-Learning Processes In Educational Institutions: A Systematic Review |
description |
La pandemia del COVID-19 aceleró la adopción de métodos de enseñanza virtuales e híbridos, provocando cambios sustanciales en los enfoques educativos. Este estudio se centró en evaluar el efecto de las tecnologías mediadoras en los procesos educativos posteriores a la pandemia, subrayando su rol esencial en mejorar la interacción y cooperación entre docentes y estudiantes. Aunque su relevancia es evidente, persisten desafíos en cuanto al acceso, la calidad y la evaluación de las iniciativas educativas tecnológicas. Para enfrentar estos retos, se ejecutó una revisión literaria, examinando 26 estudios académicos internacionales publicados en los últimos cinco años. Los hallazgos indican que las tecnologías mediadoras influyen positivamente en la motivación, la retención de estudiantes y el aprendizaje autodirigido, especialmente en la educación superior y la enseñanza de idiomas. Sin embargo, los efectos varían según el contexto. Se recomienda una estrategia de implementación tecnológica en el aula que potencie los aprendizajes y apoye una formación integral, resaltando la importancia de desarrollar programas integrales de planificación, ejecución y evaluación de tecnologías educativas antes de aplicar estos hallazgos en contextos específicos como el colombiano.
|
description_eng |
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of virtual and hybrid teaching methods, leading to substantial changes in educational approaches. This study focused on evaluating the effect of mediating technologies on post-pandemic educational processes, emphasizing their essential role in enhancing interaction and cooperation between teachers and students. Although their relevance is evident, challenges persist in terms of access, quality, and evaluation of technological educational initiatives. To address these challenges, a comprehensive literature review was conducted, examining 26 international academic studies published in the last five years. The findings indicate that mediating technologies positively influence motivation, student retention, and self-directed learning, especially in higher education and language teaching. However, the effects vary depending on the context. It is recommended to implement a technological strategy in the classroom that enhances learning and supports holistic education, highlighting the importance of developing comprehensive programs for planning, execution, and evaluation of educational technologies before applying these findings in specific contexts like Colombia.
|
author |
Navarro, Rafael Cecilio |
author_facet |
Navarro, Rafael Cecilio |
topicspa_str_mv |
educación virtual Educación tecnológica Procesos de aprendizaje Procesos de enseñanza Mediación tecnológica |
topic |
educación virtual Educación tecnológica Procesos de aprendizaje Procesos de enseñanza Mediación tecnológica Learning processes Technological mediation Teaching processes Technological education Virtual education |
topic_facet |
educación virtual Educación tecnológica Procesos de aprendizaje Procesos de enseñanza Mediación tecnológica Learning processes Technological mediation Teaching processes Technological education Virtual education |
citationvolume |
12 |
citationedition |
, Año 2024 : Enero - Diciembre |
publisher |
Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú. |
ispartofjournal |
Propósitos y Representaciones |
source |
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1958 |
language |
Español |
format |
Article |
rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Propósitos y Representaciones - 2024 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0. |
references |
Lenkaitis, C. A. (2020). Technology as a mediating tool: videoconferencing, L2 learning, and learner autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1572018 Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2015). Declaración de Incheon y marco de acción para la realización del objetivo de desarrollo sostenible 4. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656_spa Muñoz, H. A. (2016). Mediaciones tecnológicas: Nuevos escenarios de la práctica pedagógica. Praxis & Saber, 7(13), 199–221. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/prasa/v7n13/v7n13a10.pdf Ministerio de Educación Nacional de Colombia & Centro Regional para el Fomento del Libro en América Latina y el Caribe. (2022). Más y mejores aprendizajes: Política pública de recursos educativos. MEN-CERLALC. Meier, E. B. (2021). Designing and using digital platforms for 21st century learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 217–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09880-4 Maziriri, E. T., Gapa, P., & Chuchu, T. (2020). Student perceptions towards the use of youtube as an educational tool for learning and tutorials. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1329a Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2023). Designing Online Learning in Higher Education. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (pp. 1217–1236). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6 Marks, B., & Thomas, J. (2022). Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 1287–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10653-6 Marcelo, C., & Yot-Domínguez, C. (2019). From chalk to keyboard in higher education classrooms: changes and coherence when integrating technological knowledge into pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(7), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1429584 Makruf, I., Rifa’i, A. A., & Triana, Y. (2022). Moodle-based online learning management in higher education. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1518a López-Tocón, I. (2021). Moodle quizzes as a continuous assessment in higher education: An exploratory approach in physical chemistry. Education Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090500 Liu, Z. Y., Lomovtseva, N., & Korobeynikova, E. (2020). Online learning platforms: Reconstructing modern higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(13), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i13.14645 Kouser, S., & Majid, I. (2021). Technological tools for enhancing teaching and learning process. Towards Excellence: An Indexed, Refereed & Peer Reviewed. Journal of Higher Education, 13(1), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.37867/te130133 Paetsch, J., Franz, S., & Wolter, I. (2023). Changes in early career teachers’ technology use for teaching: The roles of teacher self-efficacy, ICT literacy, and experience during COVID-19 school closure. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104318 Khalid, M., Hossain, M. S., & Gregory, S. (2023). Contextual variation on teachers’ conceptions of ICT-enhanced teaching in engineering education. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14531 Kamali, A., Yavuz, T., & Tabak, H. (2022). Learning mediation via Web 2.0 tools in the context of school health and safety. Research in Pedagogy, 12(1), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2201127k Jie, Z., & Sunze, Y. (2022). A mobile pedagogical framework for enhancing online teaching and learning in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2039945 Jara, I. (2015). Infraestructura digital para educación: avances y desafíos para Latinoamérica. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000371044 Hussaeni, S., Pratama, H., Arifin, R. A., Winda, A., & Widianingsih, S. (2020). The Use of YouTube as a Learning Tool in Teaching Listening Skill. International Journal of Global Operations Research, 1(3), 123–129. http://www.iorajournal.org/index.php/ijgor/article/view/50/57 Horst, S. O., & Hitters, E. (2020). Digital media entrepreneurship: implications for strategic identity work and knowledge sharing of beginning entrepreneurs. Nordic Journal of Media Management Issue, 1(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.5278/njmm.2597-0445.3612 Hidayat-ur-Rehman, I., Akram, M. S., Malik, A., Mokhtar, S. A., Bhatti, Z. A., & Khan, M. A. (2020). Exploring the determinants of digital content adoption by academics: the moderating role of environmental concerns and price value. SAGE Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020931856 Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004 Habib, M. (2023). Digital transformation strategy for developing higher education in conflict-affected societies. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100627 Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2019). Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems. Systematic Reviews, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1089-2 Frango, I., Casali, A., Morales, A. V., Silva, A., Collazos, C. A., Cechinel, C., Muñoz-Arteaga, J., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Chacón Rivas, M., Motz, R., Rodés, V., & Ochoa, X. (2021). Iguales en las diferencias: iniciativas de investigación transnacionales sobre Informática Educativa en Latinoamérica en el periodo 2010-2020. Revista Brasileira de Informática Na Educação, 29, 1060–1090. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2021). Estrategia de la UNESCO sobre la innovación tecnológica en la educación (2022-2025). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378847_spa Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista Española de Cardiología, 74(9), 790–799. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 España-Delgado, J. A. (2023). Kahoot, Quizizz, and Quizalize in the English Class and their Impact on Motivation. HOW, 30(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.30.1.641 Wagiran, W., Suharjana, S., Nurtanto, M., & Mutohhari, F. (2022). Determining the e-learning readiness of higher education students: A study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11160 Whitworth, K., Donnellan-Fernandez, R., & Fleet, J. A. (2023). Digital transformation of antenatal education: A descriptive exploratory study of women’s experiences of online antenatal education. Women and Birth. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2023.08.008 West, R. E. (2023). Introduction to Design, Delivery, and Assessment in ODDE. In Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (pp. 1149–1158). Springer. Vieira, C. R., & Pedro, N. (2023). Weaknesses of ICT integration in the initial teacher education curriculum. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100150 Pardamean, B., Suparyanto, T., Cenggoro, T. W., Sudigyo, D., & Anugrahana, A. (2022). AI-Based Learning Style Prediction in Online Learning for Primary Education. IEEE Access, 10, 35725–35735. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3160177 Vandeyar, T. (2020). The academic turn: Social media in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5617–5635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10240-1 Uman, L. S. (2011). Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 20(1), 57–59. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024725/ Turgut, Y. E., & Aslan, A. (2021). Factors affecting ICT integration in TURKISH education: a systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4069–4092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10441-2 Tseng, H., Yi, X., & Cunningham, B. J. (2022). Learning technology acceptance and continuance intention among business students: The mediating effects of confirmation, flow, and engagement. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 70–86. Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2020). Collaboration and fuzzy-modeled personalization for mobile game-based learning in higher education. Computers and Education, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103698 Stevens, G. J., Bienz, T., Wali, N., Condie, J., & Schismenos, S. (2021). Online university education is the new normal: ¿but is face-to-face better? Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0181/FULL/PDF Shurygin, V., Berestova, A., Litvinova, T., Kolpak, E., & Nureyeva, A. (2021). Universal models and platforms in E-Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(9), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i09.19697 Samoylenko, N., Zharko, L., & Glotova, A. (2022). Designing online learning environment: Ict tools and teaching strategies. Athens Journal of Education, 9(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.30958/AJE.9-1-4 Ramírez, M., Cortés, E., & Díaz, A. (2020). Technopedagogical mediation strategies in virtual learning environments. Apertura, 12(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.32870/Ap.v12n2.1875 Quispe, A. M., Hinojosa-Ticona, Y., Miranda, H. A., & Sedano, C. A. (2021). Serie de redacción científica: Revisiones sistemáticas. Revista del Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo, 14(1), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.35434/rcmhnaaa.2021.141.906 Pozo, J. I., Pérez, M. P., Casas-Mas, A., López-Íñiguez, G., Cabellos, B., Méndez, E., Torrado, J. A., & Baño, L. (2022). Teaching and learning musical instruments through ICT: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Heliyon, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08761 Pirela, J., Pérez, L. E., & Pardo, L. E. (2022). Tendencias y retos de la formación docente en Iberoamérica. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 28(4), 315–334. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8703847 Fansury, A. H., Januarty, R., Rahman, A. W., & Syawal, S. (2020). Digital Content for Millennial Generations: Teaching the English Foreign Language Learner on COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55(3). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.3.40 Ergüzen, A., Erdal, E., Ünver, M., & Özcan, A. (2021). Improving technological infrastructure of distance education through trustworthy platform‐independent virtual software application pools. Applied Sciences, 11(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031214 Eichen, L., Hackl-Wimmer, S., Eglmaier, M. T. W., Lackner, H. K., Paechter, M., Rettenbacher, K., Rominger, C., & Walter-Laager, C. (2021). Families’ digital media use: Intentions, rules and activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2162–2177. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.13161 Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Kosnin, A. B. M., & Darwish, M. (2020). Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z Acar, A., & Kayaoglu, M. N. (2020). Moodle as a potential tool for language education under the shadow of covid-19. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2020(90), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.90.4 Baldwin, S. J., & Ching, Y. H. (2020). Guidelines for Designing Online Courses for Mobile Devices. TechTrends, 64(3), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00463-6 Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2023). Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: a systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1373–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11243-w Barnes, S. J. (2020). Information management research and practice in the post-COVID-19 world. International Journal of Information Management, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102175 Barfi, K. A., Arkorful, V., Appiah, F., Agyapong, E. M., & Acheampong, E. (2023). The impact of blended learning on students using the IBOX platform: Initial perspectives of teachers. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14297 Adzovie, D., & Jibril, A. B. (2022). Assessment of the effects of Covid-19 pandemic on the prospects of e-learning in higher learning institutions: The mediating role of academic innovativeness and technological growth. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2041222 Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1 Chaiyo, Y., & Nokham, R. (2017). The Effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google forms on the Student’s Perception in the Classrooms Response System. 2017 International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAMT.2017.7904957 Banco Mundial. (2023). Personas que usan Internet (% de la población). Banco Mundial. https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/IT.NET.USER.ZS?end=2022&name_desc=false&start=1960&view=chart Balladares-Burgos, J., & Valverde-Berrocoso, J. (2022). El modelo tecnopedagógico TPACK y su incidencia en la formación docente: una revisión de la literatura. RECIE. Revista Caribeña de Investigación Educativa, 6(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.32541/recie.2022.v6i1.pp63-72 Crisol-Moya, E., Herrera-Nieves, L., & Montes-Soldado, R. (2020). Virtual education for all: Systematic review. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.20327 Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 844–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13233 Baber, H. (2021). Modelling the acceptance of e-learning during the pandemic of COVID-19-A study of South Korea. International Journal of Management Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100503 Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance on information technology- System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022 Departamento Administrativo de la Función Pública. (2020). Decreto 1419 de 2020: Por el cual se subroga la sección 1 del capítulo 2 del título 6 de la parte 2 del libro 2 del Decreto 1078 de 2015, Decreto Único Reglamentario del Sector de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones. Diario Oficial de Colombia. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma_pdf.php?i=144825 Australian Government Department of Education. (2023, February 9). Completion rates of higher education students - Cohort analysis, 2005-2021. Australian Government Department of Education. https://www.education.gov.au/higher-education-statistics/resources/completion-rates-higher-education-students-cohort-analysis-20052021 Al-Daihani, S. M., Al-Qallaf, J. S., & AlSaheeb, S. A. (2018). Use of social media by social science academics for scholarly communication. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 67(6–7), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-11-2017-0091 Aldahdouh, T. Z., Nokelainen, P., & Korhonen, V. (2020). Technology and Social Media Usage in Higher Education: The Influence of Individual Innovativeness. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899441 Afonso, J. S., Martins, P. S., Barbosa, G. F., Ferreira, L., & Girao, M. J. B. C. (2018). Pedagogical mediation using the virtual learning environment and the new generation: A search for improved performance in medical education. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 6(3), 115–122. Dianati, S., Nguyen, M., Dao, P., Iwashita, N., & Vasquez, C. (2020). Student perceptions of technological tools for flipped instruction: The case of Padlet, ¡Kahoot!, and Cirrus. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(5). https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol17/iss5/4 |
type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
type_content |
Text |
publishDate |
2024-01-01 |
date_accessioned |
2024-01-01T00:00:00Z |
date_available |
2024-01-01T00:00:00Z |
url |
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1958 |
url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2024.v12.1958 |
issn |
2307-7999 |
eissn |
2310-4635 |
doi |
10.20511/pyr2024.v12.1958 |
citationstartpage |
e1958 |
citationendpage |
e1958 |
url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/download/1958/1900 |
_version_ |
1824464906143924224 |