Titulo:

Comportamiento de ganado vacuno de carne después de diferentes estrategias de cosecha de maíz en un sistema integrado agropecuario
.

Sumario:

El objetivo fue evaluar tres estrategias de cosecha de maíz intercalado con guandú y pasto Palisade sobre el desempeño animal desde el pastoreo hasta la finalización en un confinamiento. Se estableció un triple intercalado de maíz + guandú + pasto Palisade en nueve hectáreas durante la temporada 2016/17. Los tratamientos se determinaron de acuerdo a cada estrategia de cosecha de maíz: ensilaje integral, maíz de alta humedad o maíz en grano. Este último no se cosechó por el bajo rendimiento y las dificultades para alquilar una cosechadora para solo tres ha. Después de la cosecha, el área de 9 hectáreas se dividió en seis corrales de 1,5 hectáreas para la fase de pastoreo del experimento con 30 novillos Nelore no castrados. Los mismos animale... Ver más

Guardado en:

2027-4297

15

2023-10-24

e978

e978

Beatriz Ligoski Cabral, Tiago do Prado Paim, Estenio Moreira Alves, Lucas Ferreira Gonçalves, Lorena Martins Oliveira, Matheus Silva Rodrigues, Rowberta Teixeira dos Santos, Eduardo de Carvalho - 2023

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id metarevistapublica_unisucre_revistacolombianadecienciaanimal_recia_86_article_978
record_format ojs
spelling Comportamiento de ganado vacuno de carne después de diferentes estrategias de cosecha de maíz en un sistema integrado agropecuario
Performance of beef animals after different corn harvest strategies in a crop-livestock integrated system
El objetivo fue evaluar tres estrategias de cosecha de maíz intercalado con guandú y pasto Palisade sobre el desempeño animal desde el pastoreo hasta la finalización en un confinamiento. Se estableció un triple intercalado de maíz + guandú + pasto Palisade en nueve hectáreas durante la temporada 2016/17. Los tratamientos se determinaron de acuerdo a cada estrategia de cosecha de maíz: ensilaje integral, maíz de alta humedad o maíz en grano. Este último no se cosechó por el bajo rendimiento y las dificultades para alquilar una cosechadora para solo tres ha. Después de la cosecha, el área de 9 hectáreas se dividió en seis corrales de 1,5 hectáreas para la fase de pastoreo del experimento con 30 novillos Nelore no castrados. Los mismos animales fueron alimentados con dietas de confinamiento a base de tres fuentes de maíz siguiendo la misma estrategia de cosecha (tratamientos): ensilaje integral, maíz de alta humedad o maíz en grano. Durante la fase de pastoreo, el área que se suponía que sería cosechada para maíz en grano resultó en la mayor (p≤0.05) carga animal (3.02 unidad ganadera/hectárea) y ganancia de peso por área (210 kg corporal/ hectárea) en comparación con ensilaje integral y maíz de alta humedad. No hubo efecto (p≥0.05) de la fuente de maíz sobre la tasa de conversión alimenticia, el crecimiento del peso corporal, el grosor de la grasa subcutánea, el peso corporal antes del sacrificio, el peso de la canal caliente y rendimiento de la canal durante la fase de confinamiento.
The objective of this experiment was to evaluate three harvest strategies of corn intercropped with pigeon pea + Palisade grass on weight gain since grazing through finishing. A triple intercropping of corn + pigeon pea + Palisade grass was established in nine hectares (ha) during the 2016/17 season. Treatments were determined according to each corn harvest strategy: whole crop silage (WCS), high moisture corn (HMC) or corn grain (CG). The latter was not harvested due to a low yield and difficulties to hire a combine harvester for only three ha. After harvest, the 9-ha area was divided in six 1.5-ha pens for the grazing phase of the experiment with 30 non-castrated Nelore steers. The same animals were fed feedlot diets based on three sources of corn following the same harvest strategy (treatments): WCS, HMC or CG (bought from a feed industry). During the grazing phase the area that was supposed to be harvested for CG resulted in the greatest (p≤0.05) stocking rate (3.02 LU/ha) and weight gain per area (210 kg of BW/ha) compared with WCS and HMC. There was no response (p≥0.05) of corn source (according to each harvest strategy) on feed conversion ratio (FCR), body weith (BW) growth, subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), pre-slaughter BW, hot carcass weight (HCW) and dressing percentage (DP) during the finishing phase. The data reported here may be a valuable guideline for decision making according to the beef production system and economic scenario.
Ligoski Cabral, Beatriz
do Prado Paim, Tiago
Moreira Alves, Estenio
Ferreira Gonçalves, Lucas
Martins Oliveira, Lorena
Silva Rodrigues, Matheus
Teixeira dos Santos, Rowberta
de Carvalho, Eduardo
body weight
enegy
feedlot
forage
grain
grazing
Nelore
silage
confinamiento
energía
ensilaje
forrage
grano
Nelore
pastoreo
peso corporal
confinamento
energia
forragem
grão
Nelore
pastejo
peso corporal
silagem
15
2
Núm. 2 , Año 2023 : RECIA 15(2):JULIO-DICIEMBRE 2023
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2023-10-24T05:05:57Z
2023-10-24T05:05:57Z
2023-10-24
application/pdf
application/epub+zip
audio/mpeg
Universidad de Sucre
Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA
2027-4297
https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/978
10.24188/recia.v15.n2.2023.978
https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v15.n2.2023.978
eng
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Beatriz Ligoski Cabral, Tiago do Prado Paim, Estenio Moreira Alves, Lucas Ferreira Gonçalves, Lorena Martins Oliveira, Matheus Silva Rodrigues, Rowberta Teixeira dos Santos, Eduardo de Carvalho - 2023
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
e978
e978
Associação Brasileira das Indústrias Exportadoras de Carnes. ABIEC. Beef report. Perfil da Pecuária no Brasil; 2021. http://abiec.com.br/publicacoes/beef-report-2021/
Braga GB, Ferreira Neto JS, Ferreira F, Amaku M, Dias RA. Caracterização dos sistemas de criação de bovinos com atividade reprodutiva na região Centro-Sul do Brasil. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science. 2015; 52(3):217-227. http://10.11606/issn.1678-4456.v52i3p217-227
Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science. 2010; 327(5967):812-818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383
Dias-Filho MB. Os desafios da produção animal em pastagens na fronteira agrícola brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2011; 40 (special supplement):270-279. http://www.sbz.org.br/revista/artigos/66282.pdf
Alary V, Corbeels M, Affholder F, Alvarez S, Soria A, Valadares Xavier JH, Silva FAM, Scopel E. Economic assessment of conservation agriculture options in mixed crop-livestock systems in Brazil using farm modelling. Agricultural Systems. 2016; 144:33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.01.008
Moraes AD, Carvalho PCF, Lustosa SBC, Lang CR, Deiss L. Research on integrated crop-livestock systems in Brazil. Revista Ciência Agronômica. 2014; 45(5):1024-1031. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902014000500018
Veysset P, Lherm M, Bébin D, Roulenc M. Mixed crop-livestock farming systems: a sustainable way to produce beef? Commercial farms results, questions and perspectives. Animal. 2014; 8(8):1218-1228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000378
Sant-Anna SAC, Jantalia CP, Sá JM, Vilela L, Marchão RL, Alves BJR, Urquiaga S, Boddey RM. Changes in soil organic carbon during 22 years of pastures, cropping or integrated crop/livestock systems in the Brazilian Cerrado. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2017; 108(1):101-120. http://10.1007/s10705-016-9812-z
Vilela L, Martha Junior GB, Macedo MCM, Marchão RL, Guimarães Júnior R, Pulrolnik K, Maciel GA. Sistemas de integração lavoura-pecuária na região do Cerrado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 2011; 46(10):1127-1138. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2011001000003
Oliveira LM, Santos RT, Rodrigues MS, Santana MM, Wander AE, Carvalho ER. Impacto da alimentação de bovinos de corte terminados em confinamento: variáveis médias e marginais. Custos e @gronegócio online. 2021; 17(special edition):28-54. http://www.custoseagronegocioonline.com.br/especialv17/OK%202%20cortes.pdf
Pereira KA, Ribeiro RV, Oliveira AR, Amaral AG. Parámetros en la utilización de silaje de grano húmedo de maíz en la bovinocultura de corte. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal. 2019; 11(1):102-113. https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v11.n1.2019.622
Daniel JLP, Bernardes TF, Jobim CC, Schmidt P, Nussio LG. Production and utilization of silages in tropical areas with focus on Brazil. Grass and Forage Science. 2019; 74(2):188-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12417
Owens FN, Secrist DS, Hill WJ, Gill DR. The effect of grain source and grain processing on performance of feedlot cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science. 1997; 75(3):868-879. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.753868x
Nocek JE. Characterization of in situ dry matter and nitrogen digestion of various corn grain forms. Journal of Dairy Science. 1987; 70(11):2291-2301. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80289-8
Cardoso MRD, Marcuzzo FFN, Barros JR. Classificação climática de Köppen-Geiger para o Estado de Goiás e o Distrito Federal. Acta Geográfica. 2014; 8(16):40-55. https://doi.org/10.18227/2177-4307.acta.v8i16.1384
Rouquette Jr FM. Grazing systems research and impact of stocking strategies on pasture-animal production efficiencies. Crop Science. 2015; 55(6):2513-2530. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.01.0062
National Research Council - NRC. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 7th revised edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000. 242p.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists - AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 17th edition. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, 2000.
Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural Handbook nº 379. Agricultural Research Service - USDA, Washington, DC, 1970.
Brethour JR. The repeatability and accuracy of ultrasound in measuring backfat of cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 1992; 70(4):1039-1044. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.7041039x
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019. http://www.Rproject.org/
Alves DD, Goes RHTB, Mancio AB. Maciez da carne bovina. Ciência Animal Brasileira. 2005; 6(3):135-149. https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/370
Leonel FP, Pereira JC, Costa MG, Marco Júnior P, Lara LA, Queiroz AC. Comportamento produtivo e características nutricionais do capim-braquiária cultivado em consórcio com milho. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2009; 38(1):177-189. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009000100022
Samarakoon SP, Wilson JR, Shelton HM, Growth, morphology and nutritive quality of shaded Stenotaphrum secundatum, Axonopus compressus and Pennisetum clandestinum. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 1990; 114(2):161-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600072154
Mezzalira JC, Carvalho PCF, Trindade JK, Bremm C, Fonseca L, Amaral MF, Reffatti MV. Produção animal e vegetal em pastagem nativa manejada sob diferentes ofertas de forragem por bovinos. Ciência Rural. 2012; 42(7):1264-1270. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782012005000039
Franzluebbers AJ, Stuedemann JA. Crop and cattle production responses to tillage and cover crop management in an integrated crop-livestock system in the southeastern USA. European Journal of Agronomy. 2014; 57:62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.05.009
Oliveira CAO, Bremm C, Anghinoni I, Moraes A, Kunrath TR, Carvalho PCF. Comparison of an integrated crop-livestock system with soybean only: Economic and production responses in southern Brazil. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2014; 29(3):230-238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170513000410
Reis RA, Ruggieri AC, Casagrande DR, Páscoa AG. Suplementação da dieta de bovinos de corte como estratégia do manejo das pastagens. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2009; 38(special supplement):147-159. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009001300016
Machado PAS, Valadares Filho SC, Valadares RFD, Paulino MF, Paulino PVR, Marcondes MI. Desempenho e exigências de energia e proteína de bovinos de corte em pasto suplementados. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 2012; 64(3):683-692. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012000300021
Hoffmann A, Moraes EHBK, Mousquer CJ, Simioni TA, Gomer FJ, Ferreira VB, Silva HM. Produção de bovinos de corte no sistema pasto-suplemento no período da seca. Nativa. 2014; 2(2):119-130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v2i2.1298
https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/978/1076
https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/978/1077
https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/978/1078
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE SUCRE
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESUCRE/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA
title Comportamiento de ganado vacuno de carne después de diferentes estrategias de cosecha de maíz en un sistema integrado agropecuario
spellingShingle Comportamiento de ganado vacuno de carne después de diferentes estrategias de cosecha de maíz en un sistema integrado agropecuario
Ligoski Cabral, Beatriz
do Prado Paim, Tiago
Moreira Alves, Estenio
Ferreira Gonçalves, Lucas
Martins Oliveira, Lorena
Silva Rodrigues, Matheus
Teixeira dos Santos, Rowberta
de Carvalho, Eduardo
body weight
enegy
feedlot
forage
grain
grazing
Nelore
silage
confinamiento
energía
ensilaje
forrage
grano
Nelore
pastoreo
peso corporal
confinamento
energia
forragem
grão
Nelore
pastejo
peso corporal
silagem
title_short Comportamiento de ganado vacuno de carne después de diferentes estrategias de cosecha de maíz en un sistema integrado agropecuario
title_full Comportamiento de ganado vacuno de carne después de diferentes estrategias de cosecha de maíz en un sistema integrado agropecuario
title_fullStr Comportamiento de ganado vacuno de carne después de diferentes estrategias de cosecha de maíz en un sistema integrado agropecuario
title_full_unstemmed Comportamiento de ganado vacuno de carne después de diferentes estrategias de cosecha de maíz en un sistema integrado agropecuario
title_sort comportamiento de ganado vacuno de carne después de diferentes estrategias de cosecha de maíz en un sistema integrado agropecuario
title_eng Performance of beef animals after different corn harvest strategies in a crop-livestock integrated system
description El objetivo fue evaluar tres estrategias de cosecha de maíz intercalado con guandú y pasto Palisade sobre el desempeño animal desde el pastoreo hasta la finalización en un confinamiento. Se estableció un triple intercalado de maíz + guandú + pasto Palisade en nueve hectáreas durante la temporada 2016/17. Los tratamientos se determinaron de acuerdo a cada estrategia de cosecha de maíz: ensilaje integral, maíz de alta humedad o maíz en grano. Este último no se cosechó por el bajo rendimiento y las dificultades para alquilar una cosechadora para solo tres ha. Después de la cosecha, el área de 9 hectáreas se dividió en seis corrales de 1,5 hectáreas para la fase de pastoreo del experimento con 30 novillos Nelore no castrados. Los mismos animales fueron alimentados con dietas de confinamiento a base de tres fuentes de maíz siguiendo la misma estrategia de cosecha (tratamientos): ensilaje integral, maíz de alta humedad o maíz en grano. Durante la fase de pastoreo, el área que se suponía que sería cosechada para maíz en grano resultó en la mayor (p≤0.05) carga animal (3.02 unidad ganadera/hectárea) y ganancia de peso por área (210 kg corporal/ hectárea) en comparación con ensilaje integral y maíz de alta humedad. No hubo efecto (p≥0.05) de la fuente de maíz sobre la tasa de conversión alimenticia, el crecimiento del peso corporal, el grosor de la grasa subcutánea, el peso corporal antes del sacrificio, el peso de la canal caliente y rendimiento de la canal durante la fase de confinamiento.
description_eng The objective of this experiment was to evaluate three harvest strategies of corn intercropped with pigeon pea + Palisade grass on weight gain since grazing through finishing. A triple intercropping of corn + pigeon pea + Palisade grass was established in nine hectares (ha) during the 2016/17 season. Treatments were determined according to each corn harvest strategy: whole crop silage (WCS), high moisture corn (HMC) or corn grain (CG). The latter was not harvested due to a low yield and difficulties to hire a combine harvester for only three ha. After harvest, the 9-ha area was divided in six 1.5-ha pens for the grazing phase of the experiment with 30 non-castrated Nelore steers. The same animals were fed feedlot diets based on three sources of corn following the same harvest strategy (treatments): WCS, HMC or CG (bought from a feed industry). During the grazing phase the area that was supposed to be harvested for CG resulted in the greatest (p≤0.05) stocking rate (3.02 LU/ha) and weight gain per area (210 kg of BW/ha) compared with WCS and HMC. There was no response (p≥0.05) of corn source (according to each harvest strategy) on feed conversion ratio (FCR), body weith (BW) growth, subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), pre-slaughter BW, hot carcass weight (HCW) and dressing percentage (DP) during the finishing phase. The data reported here may be a valuable guideline for decision making according to the beef production system and economic scenario.
author Ligoski Cabral, Beatriz
do Prado Paim, Tiago
Moreira Alves, Estenio
Ferreira Gonçalves, Lucas
Martins Oliveira, Lorena
Silva Rodrigues, Matheus
Teixeira dos Santos, Rowberta
de Carvalho, Eduardo
author_facet Ligoski Cabral, Beatriz
do Prado Paim, Tiago
Moreira Alves, Estenio
Ferreira Gonçalves, Lucas
Martins Oliveira, Lorena
Silva Rodrigues, Matheus
Teixeira dos Santos, Rowberta
de Carvalho, Eduardo
topic body weight
enegy
feedlot
forage
grain
grazing
Nelore
silage
confinamiento
energía
ensilaje
forrage
grano
Nelore
pastoreo
peso corporal
confinamento
energia
forragem
grão
Nelore
pastejo
peso corporal
silagem
topic_facet body weight
enegy
feedlot
forage
grain
grazing
Nelore
silage
confinamiento
energía
ensilaje
forrage
grano
Nelore
pastoreo
peso corporal
confinamento
energia
forragem
grão
Nelore
pastejo
peso corporal
silagem
topicspa_str_mv confinamiento
energía
ensilaje
forrage
grano
Nelore
pastoreo
peso corporal
confinamento
energia
forragem
grão
Nelore
pastejo
peso corporal
silagem
citationvolume 15
citationissue 2
citationedition Núm. 2 , Año 2023 : RECIA 15(2):JULIO-DICIEMBRE 2023
publisher Universidad de Sucre
ispartofjournal Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA
source https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/978
language eng
format Article
rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Beatriz Ligoski Cabral, Tiago do Prado Paim, Estenio Moreira Alves, Lucas Ferreira Gonçalves, Lorena Martins Oliveira, Matheus Silva Rodrigues, Rowberta Teixeira dos Santos, Eduardo de Carvalho - 2023
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references_eng Associação Brasileira das Indústrias Exportadoras de Carnes. ABIEC. Beef report. Perfil da Pecuária no Brasil; 2021. http://abiec.com.br/publicacoes/beef-report-2021/
Braga GB, Ferreira Neto JS, Ferreira F, Amaku M, Dias RA. Caracterização dos sistemas de criação de bovinos com atividade reprodutiva na região Centro-Sul do Brasil. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science. 2015; 52(3):217-227. http://10.11606/issn.1678-4456.v52i3p217-227
Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science. 2010; 327(5967):812-818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383
Dias-Filho MB. Os desafios da produção animal em pastagens na fronteira agrícola brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2011; 40 (special supplement):270-279. http://www.sbz.org.br/revista/artigos/66282.pdf
Alary V, Corbeels M, Affholder F, Alvarez S, Soria A, Valadares Xavier JH, Silva FAM, Scopel E. Economic assessment of conservation agriculture options in mixed crop-livestock systems in Brazil using farm modelling. Agricultural Systems. 2016; 144:33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.01.008
Moraes AD, Carvalho PCF, Lustosa SBC, Lang CR, Deiss L. Research on integrated crop-livestock systems in Brazil. Revista Ciência Agronômica. 2014; 45(5):1024-1031. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902014000500018
Veysset P, Lherm M, Bébin D, Roulenc M. Mixed crop-livestock farming systems: a sustainable way to produce beef? Commercial farms results, questions and perspectives. Animal. 2014; 8(8):1218-1228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000378
Sant-Anna SAC, Jantalia CP, Sá JM, Vilela L, Marchão RL, Alves BJR, Urquiaga S, Boddey RM. Changes in soil organic carbon during 22 years of pastures, cropping or integrated crop/livestock systems in the Brazilian Cerrado. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2017; 108(1):101-120. http://10.1007/s10705-016-9812-z
Vilela L, Martha Junior GB, Macedo MCM, Marchão RL, Guimarães Júnior R, Pulrolnik K, Maciel GA. Sistemas de integração lavoura-pecuária na região do Cerrado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 2011; 46(10):1127-1138. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2011001000003
Oliveira LM, Santos RT, Rodrigues MS, Santana MM, Wander AE, Carvalho ER. Impacto da alimentação de bovinos de corte terminados em confinamento: variáveis médias e marginais. Custos e @gronegócio online. 2021; 17(special edition):28-54. http://www.custoseagronegocioonline.com.br/especialv17/OK%202%20cortes.pdf
Pereira KA, Ribeiro RV, Oliveira AR, Amaral AG. Parámetros en la utilización de silaje de grano húmedo de maíz en la bovinocultura de corte. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal. 2019; 11(1):102-113. https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v11.n1.2019.622
Daniel JLP, Bernardes TF, Jobim CC, Schmidt P, Nussio LG. Production and utilization of silages in tropical areas with focus on Brazil. Grass and Forage Science. 2019; 74(2):188-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12417
Owens FN, Secrist DS, Hill WJ, Gill DR. The effect of grain source and grain processing on performance of feedlot cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science. 1997; 75(3):868-879. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.753868x
Nocek JE. Characterization of in situ dry matter and nitrogen digestion of various corn grain forms. Journal of Dairy Science. 1987; 70(11):2291-2301. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80289-8
Cardoso MRD, Marcuzzo FFN, Barros JR. Classificação climática de Köppen-Geiger para o Estado de Goiás e o Distrito Federal. Acta Geográfica. 2014; 8(16):40-55. https://doi.org/10.18227/2177-4307.acta.v8i16.1384
Rouquette Jr FM. Grazing systems research and impact of stocking strategies on pasture-animal production efficiencies. Crop Science. 2015; 55(6):2513-2530. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.01.0062
National Research Council - NRC. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 7th revised edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000. 242p.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists - AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 17th edition. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, 2000.
Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural Handbook nº 379. Agricultural Research Service - USDA, Washington, DC, 1970.
Brethour JR. The repeatability and accuracy of ultrasound in measuring backfat of cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 1992; 70(4):1039-1044. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.7041039x
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019. http://www.Rproject.org/
Alves DD, Goes RHTB, Mancio AB. Maciez da carne bovina. Ciência Animal Brasileira. 2005; 6(3):135-149. https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/370
Leonel FP, Pereira JC, Costa MG, Marco Júnior P, Lara LA, Queiroz AC. Comportamento produtivo e características nutricionais do capim-braquiária cultivado em consórcio com milho. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2009; 38(1):177-189. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009000100022
Samarakoon SP, Wilson JR, Shelton HM, Growth, morphology and nutritive quality of shaded Stenotaphrum secundatum, Axonopus compressus and Pennisetum clandestinum. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 1990; 114(2):161-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600072154
Mezzalira JC, Carvalho PCF, Trindade JK, Bremm C, Fonseca L, Amaral MF, Reffatti MV. Produção animal e vegetal em pastagem nativa manejada sob diferentes ofertas de forragem por bovinos. Ciência Rural. 2012; 42(7):1264-1270. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782012005000039
Franzluebbers AJ, Stuedemann JA. Crop and cattle production responses to tillage and cover crop management in an integrated crop-livestock system in the southeastern USA. European Journal of Agronomy. 2014; 57:62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.05.009
Oliveira CAO, Bremm C, Anghinoni I, Moraes A, Kunrath TR, Carvalho PCF. Comparison of an integrated crop-livestock system with soybean only: Economic and production responses in southern Brazil. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2014; 29(3):230-238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170513000410
Reis RA, Ruggieri AC, Casagrande DR, Páscoa AG. Suplementação da dieta de bovinos de corte como estratégia do manejo das pastagens. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2009; 38(special supplement):147-159. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009001300016
Machado PAS, Valadares Filho SC, Valadares RFD, Paulino MF, Paulino PVR, Marcondes MI. Desempenho e exigências de energia e proteína de bovinos de corte em pasto suplementados. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 2012; 64(3):683-692. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012000300021
Hoffmann A, Moraes EHBK, Mousquer CJ, Simioni TA, Gomer FJ, Ferreira VB, Silva HM. Produção de bovinos de corte no sistema pasto-suplemento no período da seca. Nativa. 2014; 2(2):119-130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v2i2.1298

type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2023-10-24
date_accessioned 2023-10-24T05:05:57Z
date_available 2023-10-24T05:05:57Z
url https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/978
url_doi https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v15.n2.2023.978
eissn 2027-4297
doi 10.24188/recia.v15.n2.2023.978
citationstartpage e978
citationendpage e978
url2_str_mv https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/978/1076
url5_str_mv https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/978/1077
url7_str_mv https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/978/1078
_version_ 1811200772153540608