Titulo:
Ácidos orgánicos, microbiota, salud intestinal y respuesta productiva en pollos de engorde
.
Sumario:
Desde mediados del siglo pasado, el uso de antibióticos promotores de crecimiento en los piensos ha mejorado el rendimiento de varias especies animales productoras de alimentos. Sin embargo, la resistencia bacteriana a estos fármacos amenaza a la salud pública ha conducido a su prohibición en la alimentación animal. Esto ha incrementado los problemas entéricos en pollos de engorde y, en consecuencia, el uso de antibióticos con fines terapéuticos. En este contexto, se han propuesto varias alternativas a los antibióticos promotores de crecimiento, entre estas, los ácidos orgánicos que, de acuerdo con sus propiedades físicas y químicas, modifican la composición de la microbiota intestinal, cuyos metabolitos, como los ácidos grasos de cadena co... Ver más
Guardado en:
2027-4297
15
2023-10-24
e1019
e1019
Sixto Leonardo Reyna-Gallegos, José Gregorio Arteaga-Solórzano, Sixto Leonardo Reyna-Gallegos - 2023
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
metarevistapublica_unisucre_revistacolombianadecienciaanimal_recia_86_article_1019 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Ácidos orgánicos, microbiota, salud intestinal y respuesta productiva en pollos de engorde Organic acids, microbiota, gut health and productive response in broilers chickens Desde mediados del siglo pasado, el uso de antibióticos promotores de crecimiento en los piensos ha mejorado el rendimiento de varias especies animales productoras de alimentos. Sin embargo, la resistencia bacteriana a estos fármacos amenaza a la salud pública ha conducido a su prohibición en la alimentación animal. Esto ha incrementado los problemas entéricos en pollos de engorde y, en consecuencia, el uso de antibióticos con fines terapéuticos. En este contexto, se han propuesto varias alternativas a los antibióticos promotores de crecimiento, entre estas, los ácidos orgánicos que, de acuerdo con sus propiedades físicas y químicas, modifican la composición de la microbiota intestinal, cuyos metabolitos, como los ácidos grasos de cadena corta, favorecen la morfología, fisiología, integridad e inmunidad intestinal, aspectos que contribuyen a preservar la salud de este órgano y a incrementar la biodisponibilidad de nutrientes y, en última instancia, a mejorar la respuesta productiva de las aves. Esta revisión describe las principales características de los ácidos orgánicos comúnmente utilizados en la industria avícola, sus mecanismos de acción y sus efectos, individualmente, en combinaciones de ácidos orgánicos o con bioactivos, sobre la microbiota, sus metabolitos, y cómo esto afecta a la salud intestinal y al rendimiento productivo de pollos de engorde en diferentes condiciones sanitarias y ambientales, así como los factores que potencialmente interfieren con la actividad de los ácidos orgánicos. Palabras clave: Alimentación Animal, Agentes Antibacterianos, Digestión, Disbiosis, Mucosa Intestinal, Salud Pública. (DeCS). Since the middle of the last century, the use of antibiotic growth promoters in feed has improved the performance of several food-producing animal species. However, bacterial resistance to these drugs threatens public health and has led to their prohibition in animal feed. This has increased enteric problems in broilers and consequently the use of antibiotics for therapeutic purposes. In this context, several alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters have been proposed, among them organic acids, which, according to their physical and chemical properties, modify the composition of the intestinal microbiota, whose metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids, favor the intestinal morphology, physiology, integrity, and immunity, aspects that contribute to maintain the health of this organ and increase the bioavailability of nutrients and, ultimately, to improve the productive response of birds. This review describes the main characteristics of the organic acids commonly used in the poultry industry, their mechanisms of action and their effects, individually, in combinations of organic acids or with bioactive, on the microbiota, their metabolites, and how this affects the intestinal health and productive performance of broilers under different sanitary and environmental conditions, as well as factors that potentially interfere with the activity of organics acids.   Vera-Álava, José Olmedo Arteaga-Solórzano, José Gregorio Reyna-Gallegos, Sixto Leonardo Animal Feed Anti-Bacterial Agents Digestion Dysbiosis Intestinal Mucosa Public Health Alimentación Animal Agentes Antibacterianos Digestión Disbiosis Mucosa Intestinal Salud Pública 15 2 Núm. 2 , Año 2023 : RECIA 15(2):JULIO-DICIEMBRE 2023 Artículo de revista Journal article 2023-10-24T05:05:57Z 2023-10-24T05:05:57Z 2023-10-24 application/pdf application/epub+zip audio/mpeg Universidad de Sucre Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA 2027-4297 https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/1019 10.24188/recia.v15.n2.2023.1019 https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v15.n2.2023.1019 eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Sixto Leonardo Reyna-Gallegos, José Gregorio Arteaga-Solórzano, Sixto Leonardo Reyna-Gallegos - 2023 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0. e1019 e1019 Caekebeke N, Ringenier M, De Meyer F, Ducatelle R, Ongena N, Van Immerseel F, et al. A study on risk factors for macroscopic gut abnormalities in intensively reared broiler chickens. Avian Pathol. 2020; 49(2):193-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2019.1711019 Díaz Carrasco JM, Casanova NA, Fernández Miyakawa ME. Microbiota, Gut Health and Chicken Productivity: What Is the Connection?. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(10):374-389. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100374 Chattopadhyay MK. Use of antibiotics as feed additives: a burning question. Front Microbiol. 2014; 5(334):1-3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00334 Castanon JI. History of the use of antibiotic as growth promoters in European poultry feeds. Poult. Sci. 2007; 86(11):2466-2471. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00249 Redondo L, Chacana P, Dominguez J, Fernandez Miyakawa M. Perspectives in the use of tannins as alternative to antimicrobial growth promoter factors in poultry. Front. Microbiol. 2014; 5(118): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00118 Aboagye IA, Cordeiro MRC, McAllister TA, Ominski KH. Productivity-Enhancing Technologies. Can Consumer Choices Affect the Environmental Footprint of Beef?. Sustainability. 2021; 13(8):4283-4302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084283 Oviedo-Rondón EO. Holistic view of intestinal health in poultry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019; 250:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.01.009 Khan RU, Naz S, Raziq F, Qudratullah Q, Khan NA, Laudadio V, et al. Prospects of organic acids as safe alternative to antibiotics in broiler chickens diet. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022; 29(22):32594-32604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19241-8 Hajati H. Application of organic acids in poultry nutrition. Int. j. avian wildl. biol. 2018; 3(4):324-329. https://doi.org/10.15406/ijawb.2018.03.00114 Khan SH, Iqbal J. Recent advances in the role of organic acids in poultry nutrition. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2016; 44(1):359-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2015.1079527 11 Dittoe DK, Ricke SC, Kiess AS. Organic Acids and Potential for Modifying the Avian Gastrointestinal Tract and Reducing Pathogens and Disease. Front Vet Sci. 2018;5:1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00216 Clavijo V, Vives M. The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production: A review. Poult. Sci. 2018; 97(3):1006-1021. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex359 Borda-Molina D, Seifert J, Camarinha-Silva A. Current Perspectives of the Chicken Gastrointestinal Tract and Its Microbiome. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. 2018; 16:131-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2018.03.002 Kogut MH. The effect of microbiome modulation on the intestinal health of poultry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019; 250:32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.10.008 Wei S, Morrison M, Yu Z. Bacterial census of poultry intestinal microbiome. Poult. Sci. 2013; 92(3):671-683. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02822 Liao X, Shao Y, Sun G, Yang Y, Zhang L, Guo Y, et al. The relationship among gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acids, and intestinal morphology of growing and healthy broilers. Poult. Sci. 2020; 99(11):5883-5895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.033 Pan D, Yu Z. Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut microbes. 2014; 5(1):108-119. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.26945 Zhou Q, Lan F, Li X, Yan W, Sun C, Li J, et al. The Spatial and Temporal Characterization of Gut Microbiota in Broilers. Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.712226 Duangnumsawang Y, Zentek J, Goodarzi Boroojeni F. Development and Functional Properties of Intestinal Mucus Layer in Poultry. Front Immunol. 2021; 12:1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.745849 Shang Y, Kumar S, Oakley B, Kim WK. Chicken Gut Microbiota: Importance and Detection Technology. Front Vet Sci. 2018; 5:1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00254 Yu K, Choi I, Yun CH. Immunosecurity: immunomodulants enhance immune responses in chickens. Anim Biosci. 2021; 34(3):321-337. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0851 Ducatelle R, Goossens E, De Meyer F, Eeckhaut V, Antonissen G, Haesebrouck F, et al. Biomarkers for monitoring intestinal health in poultry: present status and future perspectives. Vet. Res. 2018; 49(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-018-0538-6 Kim JW, Kim JH, Kil DY. Dietary organic acids for broiler chickens: a review. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2015; 28(2):109-123. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.324917 Ragaa NM, Korany RMS. Studying the effect of formic acid and potassium diformate on performance, immunity and gut health of broiler chickens. Anim. Nutr. 2016; 2(4):296-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2016.08.003 Dai D, Qiu K, Zhang HJ, Wu SG, Han YM, Wu YY, et al. Organic Acids as Alternatives for Antibiotic Growth Promoters Alter the Intestinal Structure and Microbiota and Improve the Growth Performance in Broilers. Front Microbiol. 2021; 11:1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.618144 Ma J, Mahfuz S, Wang J, Piao X. Effect of Dietary Supplementation With Mixed Organic Acids on Immune Function, Antioxidative Characteristics, Digestive Enzymes Activity, and Intestinal Health in Broiler Chickens. FRONT NUTR. 2021; 8: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.673316 Sicard J-F, Le Bihan G, Vogeleer P, Jacques M, Harel J. Interactions of Intestinal Bacteria with Components of the Intestinal Mucus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017; 7: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00387 Adewole DI, Oladokun S, Santin E. Effect of organic acids–essential oils blend and oat fiber combination on broiler chicken growth performance, blood parameters, and intestinal health. Anim Nutr. 2021; 7(4):1039-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.02.001 Caricilli AM, Castoldi A, Câmara NO. Intestinal barrier: A gentlemen’s agreement between microbiota and immunity. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2014; 5(1):18-32. https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v5.i1.18 Salvo-Romero E, Alonso-Cotoner C, Pardo-Camacho C, Casado-Bedmar M, Vicario M. The intestinal barrier function and its involvement in digestive disease. J Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas. 2015; 107:686-696. https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2015.3846/2015 Park J, Kim M, Kang SG, Jannasch AH, Cooper B, Patterson J, et al. Short-chain fatty acids induce both effector and regulatory T cells by suppression of histone deacetylases and regulation of the mTOR–S6K pathway. Mucosal Immunology. 2015; 8(1):80-93. https://doi.org/10.1038/mi.2014.44 Peng J, Tang Y, Huang Y. Gut health: The results of microbial and mucosal immune interactions in pigs. Anim Nutr. 2021; 7(2):282-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.01.001 Yang X, Liu Y, Yan F, Yang C, Yang X. Effects of encapsulated organic acids and essential oils on intestinal barrier, microbial count, and bacterial metabolites in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019; 98(7):2858-2865. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez031 Kumar A, Toghyani M, Kheravii SK, Pineda L, Han Y, Swick RA, et al. Potential of blended organic acids to improve performance and health of broilers infected with necrotic enteritis. Anim Nutr. 2021; 7(2):440-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.11.006 Ali, A., Elagrb, H., Hamoud, M., Gamal, A., Mousa, M., Nasr, S., ElShater, M., Laban, S., Zahran, O., Ali, M. Effect of acidified drinking water by organic acids on broiler performance and gut health. Adv Anim Vet Sci. 2020; 8(12):1301-1309. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2020/8.12.1301.1309 Manafi M, Hedayati M, Pirany N, Omede AA. Comparison of performance and feed digestibility of the non-antibiotic feed supplement (Novacid) and an antibiotic growth promoter in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019; 98(2):904-911. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey437 Ding J, He S, Xiong Y, Liu D, Dai S, Hu H. Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Fumaric Acid on Growth Performance, Blood Hematological and Biochemical Profile of Broiler Chickens Exposed to Chronic Heat Stress. Braz J Poult Sci. 2020; 22(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1147 Zhang S, Shen YR, Wu S, Xiao YQ, He Q, Shi SR. The dietary combination of essential oils and organic acids reduces Salmonella enteritidis in challenged chicks. Poult Sci. . 2019; 98(12):6349-6355. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez457 Hernández F, García V, Madrid J, Orengo J, Catalá P, Megías MD. Effect of formic acid on performance, digestibility, intestinal histomorphology and plasma metabolite levels of broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci. 2006; 47(1):50-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660500475574 Milbradt EL, Okamoto AS, Rodrigues JCZ, Garcia EA, Sanfelice C, Centenaro LP, et al. Use of organic acids and competitive exclusion product as an alternative to antibiotic as a growth promoter in the raising of commercial turkeys. Poult Sci. 2014; 93(7):1855-1861. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03593 Al-Mutairi HMS, Hussein EOS, Jar El Nabi AR, Swelum AA, Abd El-Hack ME, Taha AE, et al. Does the Consumption of Acidified Drinking Water Affect Growth Performance and Lymphoid Organs of Broilers?. Sustainability. 2020; 12(8): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083093 Nguyen DH, Lee KY, Mohammadigheisar M, Kim IH. Evaluation of the blend of organic acids and medium-chain fatty acids in matrix coating as antibiotic growth promoter alternative on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, excreta microflora, and carcass quality in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2018; 97(12):4351-4358. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey339 Santos RR, Awati A, Roubos-van den Hil PJ, van Kempen T, Tersteeg-Zijderveld MHG, Koolmees PA, et al. Effects of a feed additive blend on broilers challenged with heat stress. Avian Pathol. 2019; 48(6):582-601. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2019.1648750 Sabour S, Tabeidian SA, Sadeghi G. Dietary organic acid and fiber sources affect performance, intestinal morphology, immune responses and gut microflora in broilers. Anim Nutr. 2019; 5(2):156-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.07.004 Saleem K, Saima, Rahman A, Pasha TN, Mahmud A, Hayat Z. Effects of dietary organic acids on performance, cecal microbiota, and gut morphology in broilers. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020; 52(6):3589-3596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02396-2 McKnight LL, Peppler W, Wright DC, Page G, Han Y. A blend of fatty acids, organic acids, and phytochemicals induced changes in intestinal morphology and inflammatory gene expression in coccidiosis-vaccinated broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019; 98(10):4901-4908. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez241 Wang H, Liang S, Li X, Yang X, Long F, Yang X. Effects of encapsulated essential oils and organic acids on laying performance, egg quality, intestinal morphology, barrier function, and microflora count of hens during the early laying period. Poult. Sci. 2019; 98(12):6751-6760. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez391 Pham VH, Kan L, Huang J, Geng Y, Zhen W, Guo Y, et al. Dietary encapsulated essential oils and organic acids mixture improves gut health in broiler chickens challenged with necrotic enteritis. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2020; 11(18):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0421-y Stefanello C, Rosa DP, Dalmoro YK, Segatto AL, Vieira MS, Moraes ML, et al. Protected Blend of Organic Acids and Essential Oils Improves Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Intestinal Health of Broiler Chickens Undergoing an Intestinal Challenge. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019; 6:1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00491 https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/1019/1091 https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/1019/1092 https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/1019/1093 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREV info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE SUCRE |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESUCRE/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA |
| title |
Ácidos orgánicos, microbiota, salud intestinal y respuesta productiva en pollos de engorde |
| spellingShingle |
Ácidos orgánicos, microbiota, salud intestinal y respuesta productiva en pollos de engorde Vera-Álava, José Olmedo Arteaga-Solórzano, José Gregorio Reyna-Gallegos, Sixto Leonardo Animal Feed Anti-Bacterial Agents Digestion Dysbiosis Intestinal Mucosa Public Health Alimentación Animal Agentes Antibacterianos Digestión Disbiosis Mucosa Intestinal Salud Pública |
| title_short |
Ácidos orgánicos, microbiota, salud intestinal y respuesta productiva en pollos de engorde |
| title_full |
Ácidos orgánicos, microbiota, salud intestinal y respuesta productiva en pollos de engorde |
| title_fullStr |
Ácidos orgánicos, microbiota, salud intestinal y respuesta productiva en pollos de engorde |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Ácidos orgánicos, microbiota, salud intestinal y respuesta productiva en pollos de engorde |
| title_sort |
ácidos orgánicos, microbiota, salud intestinal y respuesta productiva en pollos de engorde |
| title_eng |
Organic acids, microbiota, gut health and productive response in broilers chickens |
| description |
Desde mediados del siglo pasado, el uso de antibióticos promotores de crecimiento en los piensos ha mejorado el rendimiento de varias especies animales productoras de alimentos. Sin embargo, la resistencia bacteriana a estos fármacos amenaza a la salud pública ha conducido a su prohibición en la alimentación animal. Esto ha incrementado los problemas entéricos en pollos de engorde y, en consecuencia, el uso de antibióticos con fines terapéuticos. En este contexto, se han propuesto varias alternativas a los antibióticos promotores de crecimiento, entre estas, los ácidos orgánicos que, de acuerdo con sus propiedades físicas y químicas, modifican la composición de la microbiota intestinal, cuyos metabolitos, como los ácidos grasos de cadena corta, favorecen la morfología, fisiología, integridad e inmunidad intestinal, aspectos que contribuyen a preservar la salud de este órgano y a incrementar la biodisponibilidad de nutrientes y, en última instancia, a mejorar la respuesta productiva de las aves. Esta revisión describe las principales características de los ácidos orgánicos comúnmente utilizados en la industria avícola, sus mecanismos de acción y sus efectos, individualmente, en combinaciones de ácidos orgánicos o con bioactivos, sobre la microbiota, sus metabolitos, y cómo esto afecta a la salud intestinal y al rendimiento productivo de pollos de engorde en diferentes condiciones sanitarias y ambientales, así como los factores que potencialmente interfieren con la actividad de los ácidos orgánicos.
Palabras clave: Alimentación Animal, Agentes Antibacterianos, Digestión, Disbiosis, Mucosa Intestinal, Salud Pública. (DeCS).
|
| description_eng |
Since the middle of the last century, the use of antibiotic growth promoters in feed has improved the performance of several food-producing animal species. However, bacterial resistance to these drugs threatens public health and has led to their prohibition in animal feed. This has increased enteric problems in broilers and consequently the use of antibiotics for therapeutic purposes. In this context, several alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters have been proposed, among them organic acids, which, according to their physical and chemical properties, modify the composition of the intestinal microbiota, whose metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids, favor the intestinal morphology, physiology, integrity, and immunity, aspects that contribute to maintain the health of this organ and increase the bioavailability of nutrients and, ultimately, to improve the productive response of birds. This review describes the main characteristics of the organic acids commonly used in the poultry industry, their mechanisms of action and their effects, individually, in combinations of organic acids or with bioactive, on the microbiota, their metabolites, and how this affects the intestinal health and productive performance of broilers under different sanitary and environmental conditions, as well as factors that potentially interfere with the activity of organics acids.
 
|
| author |
Vera-Álava, José Olmedo Arteaga-Solórzano, José Gregorio Reyna-Gallegos, Sixto Leonardo |
| author_facet |
Vera-Álava, José Olmedo Arteaga-Solórzano, José Gregorio Reyna-Gallegos, Sixto Leonardo |
| topic |
Animal Feed Anti-Bacterial Agents Digestion Dysbiosis Intestinal Mucosa Public Health Alimentación Animal Agentes Antibacterianos Digestión Disbiosis Mucosa Intestinal Salud Pública |
| topic_facet |
Animal Feed Anti-Bacterial Agents Digestion Dysbiosis Intestinal Mucosa Public Health Alimentación Animal Agentes Antibacterianos Digestión Disbiosis Mucosa Intestinal Salud Pública |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Alimentación Animal Agentes Antibacterianos Digestión Disbiosis Mucosa Intestinal Salud Pública |
| citationvolume |
15 |
| citationissue |
2 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 2 , Año 2023 : RECIA 15(2):JULIO-DICIEMBRE 2023 |
| publisher |
Universidad de Sucre |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA |
| source |
https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/1019 |
| language |
eng |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Sixto Leonardo Reyna-Gallegos, José Gregorio Arteaga-Solórzano, Sixto Leonardo Reyna-Gallegos - 2023 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references_eng |
Caekebeke N, Ringenier M, De Meyer F, Ducatelle R, Ongena N, Van Immerseel F, et al. A study on risk factors for macroscopic gut abnormalities in intensively reared broiler chickens. Avian Pathol. 2020; 49(2):193-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2019.1711019 Díaz Carrasco JM, Casanova NA, Fernández Miyakawa ME. Microbiota, Gut Health and Chicken Productivity: What Is the Connection?. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(10):374-389. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100374 Chattopadhyay MK. Use of antibiotics as feed additives: a burning question. Front Microbiol. 2014; 5(334):1-3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00334 Castanon JI. History of the use of antibiotic as growth promoters in European poultry feeds. Poult. Sci. 2007; 86(11):2466-2471. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00249 Redondo L, Chacana P, Dominguez J, Fernandez Miyakawa M. Perspectives in the use of tannins as alternative to antimicrobial growth promoter factors in poultry. Front. Microbiol. 2014; 5(118): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00118 Aboagye IA, Cordeiro MRC, McAllister TA, Ominski KH. Productivity-Enhancing Technologies. Can Consumer Choices Affect the Environmental Footprint of Beef?. Sustainability. 2021; 13(8):4283-4302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084283 Oviedo-Rondón EO. Holistic view of intestinal health in poultry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019; 250:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.01.009 Khan RU, Naz S, Raziq F, Qudratullah Q, Khan NA, Laudadio V, et al. Prospects of organic acids as safe alternative to antibiotics in broiler chickens diet. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022; 29(22):32594-32604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19241-8 Hajati H. Application of organic acids in poultry nutrition. Int. j. avian wildl. biol. 2018; 3(4):324-329. https://doi.org/10.15406/ijawb.2018.03.00114 Khan SH, Iqbal J. Recent advances in the role of organic acids in poultry nutrition. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2016; 44(1):359-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2015.1079527 11 Dittoe DK, Ricke SC, Kiess AS. Organic Acids and Potential for Modifying the Avian Gastrointestinal Tract and Reducing Pathogens and Disease. Front Vet Sci. 2018;5:1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00216 Clavijo V, Vives M. The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production: A review. Poult. Sci. 2018; 97(3):1006-1021. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex359 Borda-Molina D, Seifert J, Camarinha-Silva A. Current Perspectives of the Chicken Gastrointestinal Tract and Its Microbiome. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. 2018; 16:131-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2018.03.002 Kogut MH. The effect of microbiome modulation on the intestinal health of poultry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019; 250:32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.10.008 Wei S, Morrison M, Yu Z. Bacterial census of poultry intestinal microbiome. Poult. Sci. 2013; 92(3):671-683. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02822 Liao X, Shao Y, Sun G, Yang Y, Zhang L, Guo Y, et al. The relationship among gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acids, and intestinal morphology of growing and healthy broilers. Poult. Sci. 2020; 99(11):5883-5895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.033 Pan D, Yu Z. Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut microbes. 2014; 5(1):108-119. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.26945 Zhou Q, Lan F, Li X, Yan W, Sun C, Li J, et al. The Spatial and Temporal Characterization of Gut Microbiota in Broilers. Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.712226 Duangnumsawang Y, Zentek J, Goodarzi Boroojeni F. Development and Functional Properties of Intestinal Mucus Layer in Poultry. Front Immunol. 2021; 12:1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.745849 Shang Y, Kumar S, Oakley B, Kim WK. Chicken Gut Microbiota: Importance and Detection Technology. Front Vet Sci. 2018; 5:1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00254 Yu K, Choi I, Yun CH. Immunosecurity: immunomodulants enhance immune responses in chickens. Anim Biosci. 2021; 34(3):321-337. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0851 Ducatelle R, Goossens E, De Meyer F, Eeckhaut V, Antonissen G, Haesebrouck F, et al. Biomarkers for monitoring intestinal health in poultry: present status and future perspectives. Vet. Res. 2018; 49(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-018-0538-6 Kim JW, Kim JH, Kil DY. Dietary organic acids for broiler chickens: a review. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2015; 28(2):109-123. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.324917 Ragaa NM, Korany RMS. Studying the effect of formic acid and potassium diformate on performance, immunity and gut health of broiler chickens. Anim. Nutr. 2016; 2(4):296-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2016.08.003 Dai D, Qiu K, Zhang HJ, Wu SG, Han YM, Wu YY, et al. Organic Acids as Alternatives for Antibiotic Growth Promoters Alter the Intestinal Structure and Microbiota and Improve the Growth Performance in Broilers. Front Microbiol. 2021; 11:1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.618144 Ma J, Mahfuz S, Wang J, Piao X. Effect of Dietary Supplementation With Mixed Organic Acids on Immune Function, Antioxidative Characteristics, Digestive Enzymes Activity, and Intestinal Health in Broiler Chickens. FRONT NUTR. 2021; 8: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.673316 Sicard J-F, Le Bihan G, Vogeleer P, Jacques M, Harel J. Interactions of Intestinal Bacteria with Components of the Intestinal Mucus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017; 7: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00387 Adewole DI, Oladokun S, Santin E. Effect of organic acids–essential oils blend and oat fiber combination on broiler chicken growth performance, blood parameters, and intestinal health. Anim Nutr. 2021; 7(4):1039-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.02.001 Caricilli AM, Castoldi A, Câmara NO. Intestinal barrier: A gentlemen’s agreement between microbiota and immunity. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2014; 5(1):18-32. https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v5.i1.18 Salvo-Romero E, Alonso-Cotoner C, Pardo-Camacho C, Casado-Bedmar M, Vicario M. The intestinal barrier function and its involvement in digestive disease. J Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas. 2015; 107:686-696. https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2015.3846/2015 Park J, Kim M, Kang SG, Jannasch AH, Cooper B, Patterson J, et al. Short-chain fatty acids induce both effector and regulatory T cells by suppression of histone deacetylases and regulation of the mTOR–S6K pathway. Mucosal Immunology. 2015; 8(1):80-93. https://doi.org/10.1038/mi.2014.44 Peng J, Tang Y, Huang Y. Gut health: The results of microbial and mucosal immune interactions in pigs. Anim Nutr. 2021; 7(2):282-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.01.001 Yang X, Liu Y, Yan F, Yang C, Yang X. Effects of encapsulated organic acids and essential oils on intestinal barrier, microbial count, and bacterial metabolites in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019; 98(7):2858-2865. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez031 Kumar A, Toghyani M, Kheravii SK, Pineda L, Han Y, Swick RA, et al. Potential of blended organic acids to improve performance and health of broilers infected with necrotic enteritis. Anim Nutr. 2021; 7(2):440-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.11.006 Ali, A., Elagrb, H., Hamoud, M., Gamal, A., Mousa, M., Nasr, S., ElShater, M., Laban, S., Zahran, O., Ali, M. Effect of acidified drinking water by organic acids on broiler performance and gut health. Adv Anim Vet Sci. 2020; 8(12):1301-1309. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2020/8.12.1301.1309 Manafi M, Hedayati M, Pirany N, Omede AA. Comparison of performance and feed digestibility of the non-antibiotic feed supplement (Novacid) and an antibiotic growth promoter in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019; 98(2):904-911. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey437 Ding J, He S, Xiong Y, Liu D, Dai S, Hu H. Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Fumaric Acid on Growth Performance, Blood Hematological and Biochemical Profile of Broiler Chickens Exposed to Chronic Heat Stress. Braz J Poult Sci. 2020; 22(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1147 Zhang S, Shen YR, Wu S, Xiao YQ, He Q, Shi SR. The dietary combination of essential oils and organic acids reduces Salmonella enteritidis in challenged chicks. Poult Sci. . 2019; 98(12):6349-6355. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez457 Hernández F, García V, Madrid J, Orengo J, Catalá P, Megías MD. Effect of formic acid on performance, digestibility, intestinal histomorphology and plasma metabolite levels of broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci. 2006; 47(1):50-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660500475574 Milbradt EL, Okamoto AS, Rodrigues JCZ, Garcia EA, Sanfelice C, Centenaro LP, et al. Use of organic acids and competitive exclusion product as an alternative to antibiotic as a growth promoter in the raising of commercial turkeys. Poult Sci. 2014; 93(7):1855-1861. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03593 Al-Mutairi HMS, Hussein EOS, Jar El Nabi AR, Swelum AA, Abd El-Hack ME, Taha AE, et al. Does the Consumption of Acidified Drinking Water Affect Growth Performance and Lymphoid Organs of Broilers?. Sustainability. 2020; 12(8): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083093 Nguyen DH, Lee KY, Mohammadigheisar M, Kim IH. Evaluation of the blend of organic acids and medium-chain fatty acids in matrix coating as antibiotic growth promoter alternative on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, excreta microflora, and carcass quality in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2018; 97(12):4351-4358. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey339 Santos RR, Awati A, Roubos-van den Hil PJ, van Kempen T, Tersteeg-Zijderveld MHG, Koolmees PA, et al. Effects of a feed additive blend on broilers challenged with heat stress. Avian Pathol. 2019; 48(6):582-601. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2019.1648750 Sabour S, Tabeidian SA, Sadeghi G. Dietary organic acid and fiber sources affect performance, intestinal morphology, immune responses and gut microflora in broilers. Anim Nutr. 2019; 5(2):156-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.07.004 Saleem K, Saima, Rahman A, Pasha TN, Mahmud A, Hayat Z. Effects of dietary organic acids on performance, cecal microbiota, and gut morphology in broilers. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020; 52(6):3589-3596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02396-2 McKnight LL, Peppler W, Wright DC, Page G, Han Y. A blend of fatty acids, organic acids, and phytochemicals induced changes in intestinal morphology and inflammatory gene expression in coccidiosis-vaccinated broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019; 98(10):4901-4908. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez241 Wang H, Liang S, Li X, Yang X, Long F, Yang X. Effects of encapsulated essential oils and organic acids on laying performance, egg quality, intestinal morphology, barrier function, and microflora count of hens during the early laying period. Poult. Sci. 2019; 98(12):6751-6760. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez391 Pham VH, Kan L, Huang J, Geng Y, Zhen W, Guo Y, et al. Dietary encapsulated essential oils and organic acids mixture improves gut health in broiler chickens challenged with necrotic enteritis. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2020; 11(18):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0421-y Stefanello C, Rosa DP, Dalmoro YK, Segatto AL, Vieira MS, Moraes ML, et al. Protected Blend of Organic Acids and Essential Oils Improves Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Intestinal Health of Broiler Chickens Undergoing an Intestinal Challenge. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019; 6:1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00491 |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2023-10-24 |
| date_accessioned |
2023-10-24T05:05:57Z |
| date_available |
2023-10-24T05:05:57Z |
| url |
https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/1019 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v15.n2.2023.1019 |
| eissn |
2027-4297 |
| doi |
10.24188/recia.v15.n2.2023.1019 |
| citationstartpage |
e1019 |
| citationendpage |
e1019 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/1019/1091 |
| url5_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/1019/1092 |
| url7_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/1019/1093 |
| _version_ |
1811200772262592512 |