Titulo:

Dissociation of Procedural and Working Memory in Pigeons (Columba livia)
.

Guardado en:

2011-2084

2011-7922

9

2016-07-01

40

51

International Journal of Psychological Research - 2016

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id metarevistapublica_unisanbuenaventura_internationaljournalofpsychologicalresearch_21_article_2326
record_format ojs
spelling Dissociation of Procedural and Working Memory in Pigeons (Columba livia)
Dissociation of Procedural and Working Memory in Pigeons (Columba livia)
A new method was developed to concurrently investigate procedural memory and working memory in pigeons.  Pigeons performed a sequence of keypecks across 3 response keys in a serial response task, with periodic choice probes for the location of a recently produced response.  Procedural memory was operationally defined as decreasing response times to predictable cues in the sequence.  Working memory was reflected by accurate responses to the choice probes.  Changing the sequence of required keypecks to a random sequence interfered with procedural memory in the form of slowed response times, but did not prevent pigeons from effectively using working memory to remember specific cue locations.  Conversely, changing exposure duration of to a cue location influenced working memory but had no effect on procedural memory.  Double dissociations such as this have supported the multiple systems approach to the study of memory in cognitive psychology and neuroscience, and they encourage a similar approach in comparative psychology.
Herbranson, Walter T.
pigeon
response time
serial learning
procedural memory
working memory
9
2
Núm. 2 , Año 2016 : Special Issue of Comparative Psychology
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2016-07-01T00:00:00Z
2016-07-01T00:00:00Z
2016-07-01
application/pdf
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
International Journal of Psychological Research
2011-2084
2011-7922
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/2326
10.21500/20112084.2326
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.2326
eng
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
International Journal of Psychological Research - 2016
40
51
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Chapter: Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K. W., & Spence, J. T. The psychology of learning and motivation (Volume 2). New York: Academic Press. pp. 89–195.
Baddeley, A .D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Bolhuis, J. J., & Van Kampen, H. S. (1988). Serial position curves in spatial memory of rats: Primacy and recency effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40(2), 135-149.
Brown, P. L., & Jenkins, H. J. (1968). Autoshaping of the pigeon’s keypeck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 1–8.
Christie,M.A., & Dalrymple-Alford, J. C. (2004).A new rat model of the human serial reaction time task: Contrasting effects of caudate and hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1034–1039.
Colwill, R., Raymond, M., Ferreira, L., & Escudero, H. (2005). Visual discrimination learning in zebrafish. Behavioral Processes, 70, 19–31. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2005.03.001
Curran, T. & Keele, S.W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 19, 189-202.
DeCoteau, W. E., & Kesner, R. P. (2000). A double dissociation between the rat hippocampus and medial caudoputamen in processing two forms of knowledge. Behavioral neuroscience, 114(6), 1096.
Diekamp, B., Kalt, T. & Gunturkun, O. (2002). Working memory neurons in pigeons. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 1-5.
Froehlich, A. L., Herbranson, W.T., Loper, J.D., Wood, D.M. & Shimp, C.P. (2004). Anticipating by pigeons depends on local statistical information in a serial response time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 31-45.
Herbranson, W.T., Xi, P.M. & Trinh, Y.T. (2014). Spatial variability in serial response learning and performance by pigeons (Columba livia). International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 27(2), 280-294.
Herbranson, W.T. & Stanton,G.L. (2011). Flexible Serial Response Learning by Pigeons (Columba livia) and Humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125(3), 328-340.
Hunt, R. H., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: Access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 658–680.
Locurto, C., Gagne, M., & Levesque, K. (2009). Implicit chaining in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 116–122.
Jones, C., McGhee, R., & Wilkie, D. (1990). Hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) use spatial memory in foraging for food to hoard. Behavioral Processes, 21, 179–187. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(90)90023-9
Kay, C., Harper, D. N., & Hunt, M. (2010). Differential effects of MDMA and scopolamine on working versus reference memory in the radial arm maze task. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 93(2), 151-156.
Laughlin, K., & Mendl, M. (2000). Pigs shift too: Foraging strategies and spatial memory in the domestic pig. Animal Behavior, 60, 403–410. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1468
Macpherson, K., & Roberts, W. A. (2010). Spatial memory in dogs (Canis familiaris) on a radial maze. Journal of comparative psychology, 124(1), 47.
Mennenga, S.E., Baxter, L.C., Grunfeld, I.S., Brewer, G.A., Aiken, L.S., Engler-Chiurazzi, E.B., Camp, B.W., Acosta, J.I., Braden, B.B., Schaefer, K.R. and Gerson, J.E. (2014). Navigating to new frontiers in behavioral neuroscience: traditional neuropsychological tests predict human performance on a rodent-inspired radial-arm maze. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8.
Murdock, B. (1962). Serial Position Effect of Free Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(2), 482–488. doi:10.1037/h0045106.
Nissen, M.J. & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
Olton, D.S. & Samuelson, R.J. (1976). Remembrances of places past: Spatial memory in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 2, 97-116.
Packard, M. G., Hirsh, R., & White, N. M. (1989). Differential effects of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: evidence for multiple memory systems. The Journal of neuroscience, 9(5), 1465-1472.
Poling, A., Nickel, M. & Alling, K. (1990). Free birds aren’t fat: Weight gain in captured wild pigeons maintained under laboratory conditions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 423-424.
Procyk, E., Dominey, P. F., Amiez, C., & Joseph, J.-P. (2000). The effects of sequence structure and reward schedule on serial reaction time learning in the monkey. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 239–248.
Roberts, W.A., Strang, C., & Macpherson, K. (2015). Memory systems interaction in the pigeon: Working and reference memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 41(2), 152-162.
Roberts, W. A., & Van Veldhuizen, N. (1985). Spatial memory in pigeons on the radial maze. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11(2), 241.
Roitblat, H. L., Tham, W., & Golub, L. (1982). Performance of Betta splendens in a radial arm maze. Animal Learning & Behavior, 10(1), 108-114.
Shimp, C.P. & Moffitt, M. (1974). Short-term memory in the pigeon: Stimulus-response associations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22(3), 507-512.
Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there?. American psychologist, 40(4), 385.
White, K.G. (1985). Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 15-34.
Willingham, D.B., & Goedert-Eschmann, K. (1999). The relation between implicit and explicit learning: Evidence for parallel development. Psychological Science, 10, 531-534.
Wilkie, D. M., & Slobin, P. (1983). Gerbils in space: Performance in the 17-arm radial maze. Journal of the experimental Analysis of Behavior, 40(3), 301-312.
Wilkinson, A., Chan, H. M., & Hall, G. (2007). Spatial learning and memory in the tortoise (Geochelone carbonaria). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121(4), 412.
Zentall, T. R. (2013), Comparative cognition: An approach whose time has come. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 100: 257–268. doi: 10.1002/jeab.35
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2326/2378
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection International Journal of Psychological Research
title Dissociation of Procedural and Working Memory in Pigeons (Columba livia)
spellingShingle Dissociation of Procedural and Working Memory in Pigeons (Columba livia)
Herbranson, Walter T.
pigeon
response time
serial learning
procedural memory
working memory
title_short Dissociation of Procedural and Working Memory in Pigeons (Columba livia)
title_full Dissociation of Procedural and Working Memory in Pigeons (Columba livia)
title_fullStr Dissociation of Procedural and Working Memory in Pigeons (Columba livia)
title_full_unstemmed Dissociation of Procedural and Working Memory in Pigeons (Columba livia)
title_sort dissociation of procedural and working memory in pigeons (columba livia)
description_eng A new method was developed to concurrently investigate procedural memory and working memory in pigeons.  Pigeons performed a sequence of keypecks across 3 response keys in a serial response task, with periodic choice probes for the location of a recently produced response.  Procedural memory was operationally defined as decreasing response times to predictable cues in the sequence.  Working memory was reflected by accurate responses to the choice probes.  Changing the sequence of required keypecks to a random sequence interfered with procedural memory in the form of slowed response times, but did not prevent pigeons from effectively using working memory to remember specific cue locations.  Conversely, changing exposure duration of to a cue location influenced working memory but had no effect on procedural memory.  Double dissociations such as this have supported the multiple systems approach to the study of memory in cognitive psychology and neuroscience, and they encourage a similar approach in comparative psychology.
author Herbranson, Walter T.
author_facet Herbranson, Walter T.
topic pigeon
response time
serial learning
procedural memory
working memory
topic_facet pigeon
response time
serial learning
procedural memory
working memory
citationvolume 9
citationissue 2
citationedition Núm. 2 , Año 2016 : Special Issue of Comparative Psychology
publisher Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
ispartofjournal International Journal of Psychological Research
source https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/2326
language eng
format Article
rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
International Journal of Psychological Research - 2016
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references_eng Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Chapter: Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K. W., & Spence, J. T. The psychology of learning and motivation (Volume 2). New York: Academic Press. pp. 89–195.
Baddeley, A .D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Bolhuis, J. J., & Van Kampen, H. S. (1988). Serial position curves in spatial memory of rats: Primacy and recency effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40(2), 135-149.
Brown, P. L., & Jenkins, H. J. (1968). Autoshaping of the pigeon’s keypeck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 1–8.
Christie,M.A., & Dalrymple-Alford, J. C. (2004).A new rat model of the human serial reaction time task: Contrasting effects of caudate and hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1034–1039.
Colwill, R., Raymond, M., Ferreira, L., & Escudero, H. (2005). Visual discrimination learning in zebrafish. Behavioral Processes, 70, 19–31. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2005.03.001
Curran, T. & Keele, S.W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 19, 189-202.
DeCoteau, W. E., & Kesner, R. P. (2000). A double dissociation between the rat hippocampus and medial caudoputamen in processing two forms of knowledge. Behavioral neuroscience, 114(6), 1096.
Diekamp, B., Kalt, T. & Gunturkun, O. (2002). Working memory neurons in pigeons. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 1-5.
Froehlich, A. L., Herbranson, W.T., Loper, J.D., Wood, D.M. & Shimp, C.P. (2004). Anticipating by pigeons depends on local statistical information in a serial response time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 31-45.
Herbranson, W.T., Xi, P.M. & Trinh, Y.T. (2014). Spatial variability in serial response learning and performance by pigeons (Columba livia). International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 27(2), 280-294.
Herbranson, W.T. & Stanton,G.L. (2011). Flexible Serial Response Learning by Pigeons (Columba livia) and Humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125(3), 328-340.
Hunt, R. H., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: Access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 658–680.
Locurto, C., Gagne, M., & Levesque, K. (2009). Implicit chaining in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 116–122.
Jones, C., McGhee, R., & Wilkie, D. (1990). Hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) use spatial memory in foraging for food to hoard. Behavioral Processes, 21, 179–187. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(90)90023-9
Kay, C., Harper, D. N., & Hunt, M. (2010). Differential effects of MDMA and scopolamine on working versus reference memory in the radial arm maze task. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 93(2), 151-156.
Laughlin, K., & Mendl, M. (2000). Pigs shift too: Foraging strategies and spatial memory in the domestic pig. Animal Behavior, 60, 403–410. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1468
Macpherson, K., & Roberts, W. A. (2010). Spatial memory in dogs (Canis familiaris) on a radial maze. Journal of comparative psychology, 124(1), 47.
Mennenga, S.E., Baxter, L.C., Grunfeld, I.S., Brewer, G.A., Aiken, L.S., Engler-Chiurazzi, E.B., Camp, B.W., Acosta, J.I., Braden, B.B., Schaefer, K.R. and Gerson, J.E. (2014). Navigating to new frontiers in behavioral neuroscience: traditional neuropsychological tests predict human performance on a rodent-inspired radial-arm maze. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8.
Murdock, B. (1962). Serial Position Effect of Free Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(2), 482–488. doi:10.1037/h0045106.
Nissen, M.J. & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
Olton, D.S. & Samuelson, R.J. (1976). Remembrances of places past: Spatial memory in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 2, 97-116.
Packard, M. G., Hirsh, R., & White, N. M. (1989). Differential effects of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: evidence for multiple memory systems. The Journal of neuroscience, 9(5), 1465-1472.
Poling, A., Nickel, M. & Alling, K. (1990). Free birds aren’t fat: Weight gain in captured wild pigeons maintained under laboratory conditions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 423-424.
Procyk, E., Dominey, P. F., Amiez, C., & Joseph, J.-P. (2000). The effects of sequence structure and reward schedule on serial reaction time learning in the monkey. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 239–248.
Roberts, W.A., Strang, C., & Macpherson, K. (2015). Memory systems interaction in the pigeon: Working and reference memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 41(2), 152-162.
Roberts, W. A., & Van Veldhuizen, N. (1985). Spatial memory in pigeons on the radial maze. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11(2), 241.
Roitblat, H. L., Tham, W., & Golub, L. (1982). Performance of Betta splendens in a radial arm maze. Animal Learning & Behavior, 10(1), 108-114.
Shimp, C.P. & Moffitt, M. (1974). Short-term memory in the pigeon: Stimulus-response associations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22(3), 507-512.
Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there?. American psychologist, 40(4), 385.
White, K.G. (1985). Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 15-34.
Willingham, D.B., & Goedert-Eschmann, K. (1999). The relation between implicit and explicit learning: Evidence for parallel development. Psychological Science, 10, 531-534.
Wilkie, D. M., & Slobin, P. (1983). Gerbils in space: Performance in the 17-arm radial maze. Journal of the experimental Analysis of Behavior, 40(3), 301-312.
Wilkinson, A., Chan, H. M., & Hall, G. (2007). Spatial learning and memory in the tortoise (Geochelone carbonaria). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121(4), 412.
Zentall, T. R. (2013), Comparative cognition: An approach whose time has come. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 100: 257–268. doi: 10.1002/jeab.35
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2016-07-01
date_accessioned 2016-07-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2016-07-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/2326
url_doi https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.2326
issn 2011-2084
eissn 2011-7922
doi 10.21500/20112084.2326
citationstartpage 40
citationendpage 51
url2_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/2326/2378
_version_ 1811200841918447616