Examen de los valores materialistas de estudiantes universitarios en Tailandia
Titulo:

Examen de los valores materialistas de estudiantes universitarios en Tailandia
.

Sumario:

Los objetivos de este estudio fueron clasificar a los estudiantes universitarios en términos de su materialismo y comparar la diferencia en ciertos atributos entre los segmentos. Los atributos que fueron tomados en consideración fueron: el nivel educativo y ocupación del padre, el dinero recibido de la familia, la comunicación familiar y la susceptibilidad a la influencia de los pares. En esta investigación fueron utilizados cuestionarios para recopilar datos de 620 estudiantes entre 18 y 21 años de edad en Bangkok. Se utilizó el análisis de conglomerados donde los estudiantes podían clasificarse en tres grupos: los que creen que el dinero es el centro de la vida (centralidad), los que creen que el dinero es una medida del éxito en la vida... Ver más

Guardado en:

International Journal of Psychological Research

2011-2084

2011-7922

Wichadee, Saovapa

Sereetrakul, Wilailuk

Likitapiwat, Tanakorn

UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA

10.21500/20112084.650

8

2015-01-01

109

118

Colombia

materialismo

comunicación familiar

susceptibilidad a la influencia de los pares

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

International Journal of Psychological Research - 2015

id metarevistapublica_unisanbuenaventura_internationaljournalofpsychologicalresearch_21-article-650
record_format ojs
spelling Examen de los valores materialistas de estudiantes universitarios en Tailandia
Artículo de revista
Los objetivos de este estudio fueron clasificar a los estudiantes universitarios en términos de su materialismo y comparar la diferencia en ciertos atributos entre los segmentos. Los atributos que fueron tomados en consideración fueron: el nivel educativo y ocupación del padre, el dinero recibido de la familia, la comunicación familiar y la susceptibilidad a la influencia de los pares. En esta investigación fueron utilizados cuestionarios para recopilar datos de 620 estudiantes entre 18 y 21 años de edad en Bangkok. Se utilizó el análisis de conglomerados donde los estudiantes podían clasificarse en tres grupos: los que creen que el dinero es el centro de la vida (centralidad), los que creen que el dinero es una medida del éxito en la vida (éxito), y los que creen que el dinero hace una vida feliz (la felicidad). Los estudiantes de los tres grupos parecían ser de diferentes atributos. Los estudiantes del grupo de centralidad provienen de familias más pobres, mientras que aquellos en el grupo de éxito provienen de familias con una mejor situación financiera, finalmente los del colectivo de felicidad son más susceptibles a la influencia de los pares que los otros dos grupos. Las implicaciones del estudio fueron discutidas como un comentario final.
Examen de los valores materialistas de estudiantes universitarios en Tailandia
materialismo
comunicación familiar
susceptibilidad a la influencia de los pares
Nunnally, J. C. (1978).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nguyen, H. V., Moschis, G. P., & Shannon, R. (2009). Effects of family structure and socialization on materialism: a life course study in Thailand. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 486-495.
int.j.psychol.res. 8 (1) PP. 24 - 35
Likitapiwat, Sereetrakul & W ichadee(2014)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH Materialistic Values of University Students in Thailand
R E S E A R C H
Moschis, G. P., Ong, F. S., Mathur, A., Yamashita, T., & Benmoyal-Bouzaglo, S. (2011). Family and television influences on materialism: A cross-cultural life-course approach. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 5(2), 124-144.
Moschis, G. P., Moore, R. L., & Smith, R. B. (1984). The impact of family communication on adolescent consumer socialization. In T, Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 314–319.
Mangleburg, T. F., Doney, P., & Bristol, T. (2004). Shopping with friends and teens’ susceptibility to peer influence. Journal of Retailing, 80, 201-216.
Moschis, G. P., Hosie, P., &Vel, P. (2009). Effects of family structure and socialization on materialism: A life course study in Malaysia. Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 21(1), 166-181.
Moschis, G. P. (2007). Stress and consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(3), 430-444.
Pratkanis, A. R. (Eds.). (2007). The science of social influence: advances and future progress. Frontiers of Social Psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Mangleburg, T. F., & Bristol, T. (1998). Socialization and adolescents’ skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 27(3), 11–21.
Lueg, J. E., & Finney, R. Z. (2007). Interpersonal communication in the consumer socialization process: scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 15(1), 25-39.
La Ferle, C., & Chan, K. (2008). Determinants for materialism among adolescents in Singapore. Journal of Young Consumer, 9(3), 201-214.
Kasser, T., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Sheldon, K. M. (2004). Materialistic values: Their causes and consequences. Psychology and consumer culture. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.
Kasser, T. (2005). “Frugality, Generosity, and Materialism in Children and Adolescents,” in What Do Children Need to Flourish? Conceptualizing and Measuring Indicators of Positive Development, Kristin Anderson Moore and Laura H. Lippman, eds, New York: Springer Science, 357-373.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Babin, B., & Black, W. C. (2005). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Office of the Higher Education Commission, Thailand. (2010). Educational information, Ministry of Education. Retrieved April, 28, 2012, from http://www.moe.go.th/data stat/
Roberts, J. (2011). Shiny Objects: Why we spend money we don’t have in search of happiness we can’t buy. New York: HarperCollins.
Pugh, A. (2009). Longing and belonging: Parents, children, and consumer culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Vega, V., and Roberts, D. (2011). The Role of Television and Advertising in Stimulating Materialism in Children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York, Retrieved May, 8, 2012, from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p13169_index.html.
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. (2003). Do reverse-worded items confound measures in cross-cultural consumer behavior? The case of material value scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 72-91.
Van Boven, L., &Gilovich, T. (2003). To do or to have? That is the question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1193-1202.
Richins, M. L. (2011). Materialism, transformation, expectation, and spending: Implication for credit use. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 30(2), 141-156.
Van Boven, L. (2005). Experientialism, materialism, and the pursuit of happiness. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 132-142.
Sivanathan, N., & Pettit, N. (2010). Protecting the self through consumption: Status goods as affirmational commodities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3), 564-570.
Shrum, L. J., Wong, N., Arif, F., Chugani, S. K., Gunz, A., Lowrey, T. M., Nairn, A., Pandelaere, M., Ross, S. M., Ruvio, A., Scott, K., &Sundie, J. (2012). Re-conceptualizing materialism as identity goal pursuits: Functions, processes, and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1179-1185.
Sheldon, K., &Kraser, T. (2008). Psychological threat and extrinsic goal striving. Motivation and Emotion, 32 (1), 37–45.
Schor, J. B. (2004). Born to buy: The commercialized child and the new consumer culture. New York: Scribner.
Rucker, D., & Galinsky, A. (2008). Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 257-267.
Roberts, J. A., Manolis, C., & Tanner, J. (2008). Interpersonal influence and adolescent materialism and compulsive buying. Social Influence, 3, 114−131.
Flouri, E. (2004). An integrated model of consumer materialism: Can economic socialization and maternal value predict materialistic attitudes in adolescents? Journal of Socio-Economics, 28, 707-724.
Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer value orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303-316.
Goldberg, M. E., Gorn, G. J., Peracchio, L. A., & Bomossy, G. (2003). Materialism among youth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 278-288.
Chaplin, L. N., John, D. R. (2007). Growing up in a material world: Age differences in materialism in children and adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 119-129.
Cooper, D. R., & Sclindler, P. S. (2001). Business research methods, (7th ed.). Singapore: Mc Grow-Hill.
1
Chaplin, L. N., & John, D. R. (2010). Interpersonal influences on adolescent materialism: A new look at the role of parents and peers. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 176-184.
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/650
International Journal of Psychological Research
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
application/pdf
Journal article
8
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
susceptibility to peer influence.
family communication
materialism
Wichadee, Saovapa
Sereetrakul, Wilailuk
Likitapiwat, Tanakorn
The purposes of this study were to classify university students in terms of their materialism and to compare the difference in certain attributes among the segments. Student attributes taken into consideration included father’s educational level and occupation, money received from family, family communication and susceptibility to peer influence. In this survey research, questionnaires were used to collect data from 620 students ranging from 18 to 21 years old in Bangkok. Cluster analysis was used where students could be classified into three clusters: those who believe that money is the center of life (centrality); those who believe that money is a measure of success in life (success); and those who believe that money makes a happy life (happiness). Students from the three clusters appeared to be of different attributes. Those in the centrality group are from poorer family while those in the success cluster are from a family with better financial status, and those in the happiness cluster are more susceptible to peer influence than the other two groups. The implications of the study were discussed as a concluding remark.
Inglés
Publication
International Journal of Psychological Research - 2015
Bindah, E.V., & Othman, M. N. (2011). The role of family communication and television viewing in the development of materialistic values among young adults. A Review of International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(3), 238-248.
Chantavanich, S. (1991). Social stratification: Occupational prestige in Thai society. (Research Report). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Social Research Institute.
Chang, W. L., Liu, H. T., Lin, T. A., & Wen, Y. S. (2008). Influence of family communication structure and vanity trait on consumption behavior: A case study of adolescent students in Taiwan. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 417-435.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Chan, K., & Zhang, C. (2007). Living in a celebrity-mediated social world: the Chinese experience. Young Consumers,8(2), 139-152.
Chan, K., & Prendergast, G. (2007). Materialism and social comparison among adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal,35(2), 213-228.
R E S E A R C H
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH Materialistic Values of University Students in Thailand
Likitapiwat, Sereetrakul & W ichadee(2014)
Chan, K., &Cai, X. (2009). Influence of television advertising on adolescents in China: An urban-rural comparison. Young Consumers, 10(2), 133-145.
Burroughs, J. E., &Rindfleisch, A. (2011). What welfare? On the definition and domain of consumer research and the foundational role of materialism. In D. G. Mick, S. Pettigrew, C. Pechmann, &J. L. Ozanne (Eds.), Transformative consumer research for personal and collective well-being (pp. 249–266). New York: Routledge.
Bindah, E.V., & Othman, M. N. (2012). An empirical study of the relationship between young adults consumers characterized by religiously-oriented family communication environment and materialism. Cross Culture Communication, 8(1), 7-18.
int.j.psychol.res. 8 (1) PP. 24 - 35
Banerjee, R., &Dittmar, H. (2008). Individual differences in children's materialism: The role of peer relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 17−31.
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/650/450
109
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
2015-01-01
2011-2084
2011-7922
118
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.650
10.21500/20112084.650
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection International Journal of Psychological Research
title Examen de los valores materialistas de estudiantes universitarios en Tailandia
spellingShingle Examen de los valores materialistas de estudiantes universitarios en Tailandia
Wichadee, Saovapa
Sereetrakul, Wilailuk
Likitapiwat, Tanakorn
materialismo
comunicación familiar
susceptibilidad a la influencia de los pares
susceptibility to peer influence.
family communication
materialism
title_short Examen de los valores materialistas de estudiantes universitarios en Tailandia
title_full Examen de los valores materialistas de estudiantes universitarios en Tailandia
title_fullStr Examen de los valores materialistas de estudiantes universitarios en Tailandia
title_full_unstemmed Examen de los valores materialistas de estudiantes universitarios en Tailandia
title_sort examen de los valores materialistas de estudiantes universitarios en tailandia
description Los objetivos de este estudio fueron clasificar a los estudiantes universitarios en términos de su materialismo y comparar la diferencia en ciertos atributos entre los segmentos. Los atributos que fueron tomados en consideración fueron: el nivel educativo y ocupación del padre, el dinero recibido de la familia, la comunicación familiar y la susceptibilidad a la influencia de los pares. En esta investigación fueron utilizados cuestionarios para recopilar datos de 620 estudiantes entre 18 y 21 años de edad en Bangkok. Se utilizó el análisis de conglomerados donde los estudiantes podían clasificarse en tres grupos: los que creen que el dinero es el centro de la vida (centralidad), los que creen que el dinero es una medida del éxito en la vida (éxito), y los que creen que el dinero hace una vida feliz (la felicidad). Los estudiantes de los tres grupos parecían ser de diferentes atributos. Los estudiantes del grupo de centralidad provienen de familias más pobres, mientras que aquellos en el grupo de éxito provienen de familias con una mejor situación financiera, finalmente los del colectivo de felicidad son más susceptibles a la influencia de los pares que los otros dos grupos. Las implicaciones del estudio fueron discutidas como un comentario final.
description_eng The purposes of this study were to classify university students in terms of their materialism and to compare the difference in certain attributes among the segments. Student attributes taken into consideration included father’s educational level and occupation, money received from family, family communication and susceptibility to peer influence. In this survey research, questionnaires were used to collect data from 620 students ranging from 18 to 21 years old in Bangkok. Cluster analysis was used where students could be classified into three clusters: those who believe that money is the center of life (centrality); those who believe that money is a measure of success in life (success); and those who believe that money makes a happy life (happiness). Students from the three clusters appeared to be of different attributes. Those in the centrality group are from poorer family while those in the success cluster are from a family with better financial status, and those in the happiness cluster are more susceptible to peer influence than the other two groups. The implications of the study were discussed as a concluding remark.
author Wichadee, Saovapa
Sereetrakul, Wilailuk
Likitapiwat, Tanakorn
author_facet Wichadee, Saovapa
Sereetrakul, Wilailuk
Likitapiwat, Tanakorn
topicspa_str_mv materialismo
comunicación familiar
susceptibilidad a la influencia de los pares
topic materialismo
comunicación familiar
susceptibilidad a la influencia de los pares
susceptibility to peer influence.
family communication
materialism
topic_facet materialismo
comunicación familiar
susceptibilidad a la influencia de los pares
susceptibility to peer influence.
family communication
materialism
citationvolume 8
citationissue 1
publisher Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
ispartofjournal International Journal of Psychological Research
source https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/650
language Inglés
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
International Journal of Psychological Research - 2015
references_eng Nunnally, J. C. (1978).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nguyen, H. V., Moschis, G. P., & Shannon, R. (2009). Effects of family structure and socialization on materialism: a life course study in Thailand. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 486-495.
int.j.psychol.res. 8 (1) PP. 24 - 35
Likitapiwat, Sereetrakul & W ichadee(2014)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH Materialistic Values of University Students in Thailand
R E S E A R C H
Moschis, G. P., Ong, F. S., Mathur, A., Yamashita, T., & Benmoyal-Bouzaglo, S. (2011). Family and television influences on materialism: A cross-cultural life-course approach. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 5(2), 124-144.
Moschis, G. P., Moore, R. L., & Smith, R. B. (1984). The impact of family communication on adolescent consumer socialization. In T, Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 314–319.
Mangleburg, T. F., Doney, P., & Bristol, T. (2004). Shopping with friends and teens’ susceptibility to peer influence. Journal of Retailing, 80, 201-216.
Moschis, G. P., Hosie, P., &Vel, P. (2009). Effects of family structure and socialization on materialism: A life course study in Malaysia. Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 21(1), 166-181.
Moschis, G. P. (2007). Stress and consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(3), 430-444.
Pratkanis, A. R. (Eds.). (2007). The science of social influence: advances and future progress. Frontiers of Social Psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Mangleburg, T. F., & Bristol, T. (1998). Socialization and adolescents’ skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 27(3), 11–21.
Lueg, J. E., & Finney, R. Z. (2007). Interpersonal communication in the consumer socialization process: scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 15(1), 25-39.
La Ferle, C., & Chan, K. (2008). Determinants for materialism among adolescents in Singapore. Journal of Young Consumer, 9(3), 201-214.
Kasser, T., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Sheldon, K. M. (2004). Materialistic values: Their causes and consequences. Psychology and consumer culture. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.
Kasser, T. (2005). “Frugality, Generosity, and Materialism in Children and Adolescents,” in What Do Children Need to Flourish? Conceptualizing and Measuring Indicators of Positive Development, Kristin Anderson Moore and Laura H. Lippman, eds, New York: Springer Science, 357-373.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Babin, B., & Black, W. C. (2005). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Office of the Higher Education Commission, Thailand. (2010). Educational information, Ministry of Education. Retrieved April, 28, 2012, from http://www.moe.go.th/data stat/
Roberts, J. (2011). Shiny Objects: Why we spend money we don’t have in search of happiness we can’t buy. New York: HarperCollins.
Pugh, A. (2009). Longing and belonging: Parents, children, and consumer culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Vega, V., and Roberts, D. (2011). The Role of Television and Advertising in Stimulating Materialism in Children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York, Retrieved May, 8, 2012, from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p13169_index.html.
Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. (2003). Do reverse-worded items confound measures in cross-cultural consumer behavior? The case of material value scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 72-91.
Van Boven, L., &Gilovich, T. (2003). To do or to have? That is the question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1193-1202.
Richins, M. L. (2011). Materialism, transformation, expectation, and spending: Implication for credit use. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 30(2), 141-156.
Van Boven, L. (2005). Experientialism, materialism, and the pursuit of happiness. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 132-142.
Sivanathan, N., & Pettit, N. (2010). Protecting the self through consumption: Status goods as affirmational commodities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3), 564-570.
Shrum, L. J., Wong, N., Arif, F., Chugani, S. K., Gunz, A., Lowrey, T. M., Nairn, A., Pandelaere, M., Ross, S. M., Ruvio, A., Scott, K., &Sundie, J. (2012). Re-conceptualizing materialism as identity goal pursuits: Functions, processes, and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1179-1185.
Sheldon, K., &Kraser, T. (2008). Psychological threat and extrinsic goal striving. Motivation and Emotion, 32 (1), 37–45.
Schor, J. B. (2004). Born to buy: The commercialized child and the new consumer culture. New York: Scribner.
Rucker, D., & Galinsky, A. (2008). Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 257-267.
Roberts, J. A., Manolis, C., & Tanner, J. (2008). Interpersonal influence and adolescent materialism and compulsive buying. Social Influence, 3, 114−131.
Flouri, E. (2004). An integrated model of consumer materialism: Can economic socialization and maternal value predict materialistic attitudes in adolescents? Journal of Socio-Economics, 28, 707-724.
Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer value orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303-316.
Goldberg, M. E., Gorn, G. J., Peracchio, L. A., & Bomossy, G. (2003). Materialism among youth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 278-288.
Chaplin, L. N., John, D. R. (2007). Growing up in a material world: Age differences in materialism in children and adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 119-129.
Cooper, D. R., & Sclindler, P. S. (2001). Business research methods, (7th ed.). Singapore: Mc Grow-Hill.
Chaplin, L. N., & John, D. R. (2010). Interpersonal influences on adolescent materialism: A new look at the role of parents and peers. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 176-184.
Bindah, E.V., & Othman, M. N. (2011). The role of family communication and television viewing in the development of materialistic values among young adults. A Review of International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(3), 238-248.
Chantavanich, S. (1991). Social stratification: Occupational prestige in Thai society. (Research Report). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Social Research Institute.
Chang, W. L., Liu, H. T., Lin, T. A., & Wen, Y. S. (2008). Influence of family communication structure and vanity trait on consumption behavior: A case study of adolescent students in Taiwan. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 417-435.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Chan, K., & Zhang, C. (2007). Living in a celebrity-mediated social world: the Chinese experience. Young Consumers,8(2), 139-152.
Chan, K., & Prendergast, G. (2007). Materialism and social comparison among adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal,35(2), 213-228.
R E S E A R C H
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH Materialistic Values of University Students in Thailand
Likitapiwat, Sereetrakul & W ichadee(2014)
Chan, K., &Cai, X. (2009). Influence of television advertising on adolescents in China: An urban-rural comparison. Young Consumers, 10(2), 133-145.
Burroughs, J. E., &Rindfleisch, A. (2011). What welfare? On the definition and domain of consumer research and the foundational role of materialism. In D. G. Mick, S. Pettigrew, C. Pechmann, &J. L. Ozanne (Eds.), Transformative consumer research for personal and collective well-being (pp. 249–266). New York: Routledge.
Bindah, E.V., & Othman, M. N. (2012). An empirical study of the relationship between young adults consumers characterized by religiously-oriented family communication environment and materialism. Cross Culture Communication, 8(1), 7-18.
int.j.psychol.res. 8 (1) PP. 24 - 35
Banerjee, R., &Dittmar, H. (2008). Individual differences in children's materialism: The role of peer relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 17−31.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2015-01-01
date_accessioned 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/650
url_doi https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.650
issn 2011-2084
eissn 2011-7922
doi 10.21500/20112084.650
citationstartpage 109
citationendpage 118
url2_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/650/450
_version_ 1823199473969397760

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares