Titulo:

¿Es el afecto negativo tan malo así? El efecto de los estados afectivos en el pensamiento creativo convencional y no convencional en estudiantes universitarios.
.

Sumario:

Introducción. El papel de los estados afectivos en el proceso creativo ha sido objeto de atención por parte de los investigadores y ha dado lugar a resultadoscontradictorios. La mayor parte de la investigación en creatividad ha hecho hincapié en el papel de los estados afectivos, principalmente los positivos, sobre los nivelesde creatividad. A saber, los resultantes de las tareas de pensamiento divergente que revelan la forma no convencional de pensar en el proceso creativo. Este estudiotuvo como objetivo analizar el efecto de los estados afectivos inducidos en dos dimensiones distintas del pensamiento creativo en adultos. Método. Setenta ycinco voluntarios, en su mayoría mujeres, con una edad media de 26.95 años, fueron asignados aleatoria... Ver más

Guardado en:

2011-2084

2011-7922

16

2023-07-24

14

23

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

id metarevistapublica_unisanbuenaventura_internationaljournalofpsychologicalresearch_21-article-6497
record_format ojs
spelling ¿Es el afecto negativo tan malo así? El efecto de los estados afectivos en el pensamiento creativo convencional y no convencional en estudiantes universitarios.
Creatividad
Artículo de revista
TCT-DP
estados afectivos
pensamiento no convencional
pensamiento convencional
seguimiento ocular
¿Es el afecto negativo tan malo así? El efecto de los estados afectivos en el pensamiento creativo convencional y no convencional en estudiantes universitarios.
Introducción. El papel de los estados afectivos en el proceso creativo ha sido objeto de atención por parte de los investigadores y ha dado lugar a resultadoscontradictorios. La mayor parte de la investigación en creatividad ha hecho hincapié en el papel de los estados afectivos, principalmente los positivos, sobre los nivelesde creatividad. A saber, los resultantes de las tareas de pensamiento divergente que revelan la forma no convencional de pensar en el proceso creativo. Este estudiotuvo como objetivo analizar el efecto de los estados afectivos inducidos en dos dimensiones distintas del pensamiento creativo en adultos. Método. Setenta ycinco voluntarios, en su mayoría mujeres, con una edad media de 26.95 años, fueron asignados aleatoriamente a tres condiciones de elicitación de estados afectivos(agradable vs desagradable vs neutral), justo antes de realizar una tarea de creatividad figurativa. Resultados. Los resultados indicaron que el estado afectivonegativo condujo a niveles más altos de pensamiento convencional. Conclusiones. Nuestros resultados no apoyan ni la hipótesis de que el afecto negativo tiene unefecto perjudicial sobre la creatividad ni la de que el afecto positivo aumenta la creatividad. El afecto negativo parece promover el pensamiento convencional, quizá debido a sus correlatos cognitivos, que pueden manifestarse en la atención focalizada y el pensamiento analítico. Se discuten las implicaciones prácticas y teóricas para futuras investigaciones sobre el papel de los estados afectivos en la creatividad.
Leung, A. K. Y., Liou, S., Qiu, L., Kwan, L. Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., & Yong, J. C. (2014). The role of instrumental emotion regulation in the emotions–creativity link: How worries render individuals with high neuroticism more creative. Emotion, 14, 846–856.
Rosa, P. J., Gamito, P., Oliveira J., Morais, D., Pavlovic, M., & Smyth, O. (2016). Uso de eye tracking em realidade virtual não imersiva para avaliação cognitiva. Psicologia, Saúde e Doenças, 17(1), 23-31 https://doi.org/10.15309/15psd170104
Rosa, P. J., Caires, C., Costa, L., Rodelo, L., & Pinto, L. (2014). Affective and Psychophysiological Responses to Erotic Stimuli: Does Color Matter? In P. Gamito and P. J. Rosa (Eds.), I see me, you see me: inferring cognitive and emotional processes from gazing behavior (pp. 171-190). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Rosa, P. J., Esteves, F., & Arriaga, P. (2015). Beyond Traditional Clinical Measurements for Screening Fears and Phobias. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 64(12), 3396-3404. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2015.2450292
Rosa, P. J., Esteves, F., & Arriaga, P. (2012). Ver ou não ver, eis a questão. A relação entre atenção visual selectiva e emoção. In-Mind Português,3(1-4), 15-24.
Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: an integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and psychopathology, 17(3), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050340
Parke, M. R., Seo, M. G., & Sherf, E. N. (2015). Regulating and facilitating: The role of emotional intelligence in maintaining and using positive affect for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 917–934.
Öhman, A., & Wiens, S. (2004). The Concept of an Evolved Fear Module and Cognitive Theories of Anxiety. In A. Manstead, N. Frijda, & A. Fischer (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium (pp. 58–80). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806582.005
Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 30–47.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 44, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/ h0048850.
Fernández (Orgs.), Criatividade e desenvolvimento humano (pp. 63-79). Pimenta Cultural. 10.31560/pimentacultural/2021.596.63-79
Lúcio, P., & Chiodi, S. L. (2021). Avaliação da criatividade: passado, presente e futuro. In J. Berg, C. L. B. Vestena, C., Costa-Lobo, & V. L.
Jaarsveld, S., Lachmann, T., & Leeuwen, C. V. (2012). Creative reasoning across developmental levels: Convergence and divergence in problem creation. Intelligence, 40, 172- 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.01.002
LeDoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. Simon & Schuster.
JASP Team. (2022). JASP (Version 0.16.2) [Computer Software]. University of Amsterdam.
Lai, Y. C., Pen, S. L., Huang, P. S., & Chen, H. C. (2020). The Impact of Affective States and Affective Shifts on Creative Ideation and Evaluation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.440
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report A6. University of Florida.
Kim, K. H. (2006). Is creativity unidimensional or multidimensional? Analyses of the torrance tests of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 251–259. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_2
Rosa, P. J., Luz, F., Júnior, R., Oliveira, J., Morais, D., & Gamito, P. (2020). Adaptive Non-Immersive VR Environment for Eliciting Fear of Cockroaches: A Physiology-Driven Approach Combined with 3D-TV Exposure. International Journal of Psychological Research, 13(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4670
Ibérico Nogueira, S., Almeida, L., & Lima, T. (2018, July). In the path of Two Tracks of Thought: A Structural Model of the Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP), over the school years in Portuguese context. 16th ICIE conference 2018 on Excellence, Innovation, & Creativity in Basic-Higher Education & Psychology - University Paris Descartes, July 3-6, 2018.
Ibérico Nogueira, S., Almeida, L., & Lima, T. S. (2017a). Two Tracks of Thought: A Structural Model of the Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP). Creativity Research Journal, 29(2), 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1303312
Ibérico Nogueira, S., Almeida, M., & Lima, T. (2017b). Construct Validity of the TCT- DP In Different School Levels. In C. Pracana and M. Wang (Eds). Psychology Applications & Developments III (pp. 182-191). InScience Press.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive Affect Facilitates Creative Problem Solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122-1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122
Kaufmann, G., & Vosburg, S. K. (2002). The Effects of Mood on Early and Late Idea Production. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_3
Kaufmann, J. C. (2003). What to measure? A new look at the concept of creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 235-251. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/0031383032000079227
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1-12.
Rosa, P. J., Gamito, P., Oliveira J., Morais, D., Pavlovic, M., Smyth, O., Maia, I., & Gomes, T. (2017). Eye movement analysis and cognitive assessment: the use of comparative visual search tasks in a non-immersive VR application. Methods of Information in Medicine, 56(2), 112-116. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME16-02-0006
Schwarz, N., & Skurnik, I. (2003). Feeling and thinking: Implications for problem solving. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 263–290). Cambridge University Press.
Rosa, P. J., Oliveira, J., Alghazzawi, D., Fardoun, H., & Gamito, P. (2017). Affective and physiological correlates of the perception of unimodal and bimodal emotional stimuli. Psicothema, 29(3), 364-369. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.272
Westermann, R., Spies, K., Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. W. (1996). Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 557–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199607)26:4<557::aid-ejsp769>3.0.co;2-4
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.545713
Zenasni, F., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: An empirical study. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(1), 61–73. https://doi .org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01080.x
Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. I. (2008). Emotion-Related Traits Moderate the Impact of Emotional State on Creative Performances. Journal of individual Differences, 29(3), 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.29.3.157
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
Wilder, J. (1962), Basimetric Approach (Law Of Initial Value) To Biological Rhythms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 98, 1211-1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb30629.x
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier Academic Press. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714
Watts, L. L., Mcintosh, T. J., Gibson, C., Mulhearn, T. J., Medeiros, K., Mecca, J. T., & Cohen-Charash, Y. (2019). Mild Affective Shifts and Creativity: Effects on Idea Generation, Evaluation, and Implementation Planning. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(4), 985-1001.
Walla, P., & Panksepp, J. (2013). Neuroimaging Helps to Clarify Brain Affective Processing without Necessarily Clarifying Emotions. In K. N. Fountas (Ed.), Novel Frontiers of Advanced Neuroimaging. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/51761
Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1996). Manual of Test for Creative Thinking- Drawing Production (TCT-DP). Harcourt Test.
Uhrig, M. K., Trautmann, N., Baumgärtner, U., Treede, R.-D., Henrich, F., Hiller, W., & Marschall, S. (2016). Emotion elicitation: A comparison of pictures and films. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 180. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00180
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10
To, M. L., Fisher, C. D., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Zou, J. (2021). Feeling differently, creating together: Affect heterogeneity and creativity in project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42, 1228–1243.
Spering, M., Wagener, D., & Funke, J. (2005). The role of emotions in complex problem- solving. Cognition & Emotion, 19(8), 1252–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930500304886.
Shin, Y., Kim, M., & Lee, S. H. (2016). Positive group affective tone and team creative performance and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53, 52–68.
Shavinina, L. V. (2001). A new wave of innovations in Psychology: high intellectual and creative educational multimedia technologies. Review of General Psychology, 5(3), 291-315. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.5.3.291
Ibérico Nogueira, S., & Almeida, A. (2019). Who are they? Creativity and Innovativeness: Featuring Workers. Revista Sul Americana de Psicologia. 7(1), 32-54.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3–4), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2003.9682896.
Russell, J. A., & Bullock, M. (1985). Multidimensional scaling of emotional facial expressions: Similarity from preschoolers to adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(5), 1290–1298. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.5.1290
Ibérico Nogueira, S., Almeida, M., & Souza Lima, T. (2019). Test For Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP): A Revised Factorial Structure In An Adult Sample. In C. Pracana and M. Wang (Eds), Psychology Applications & Developments V (pp. 14-23). InScience Press.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don't: the role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687-697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.687
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
2
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Inglés
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/6497
International Journal of Psychological Research
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
application/pdf
Journal article
Núm. 2 , Año 2023 : Psychophysiology and Experimental Psychology
16
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press.
Eye Tracking
TCT-DP
affective states
unconventional thinking
conventional thinking
creativity
Ibérico Nogueira, Sara
Ribeiro, Roberto
Rosa, Pedro J.
Introduction. The role of affective states on the creative process has been receiving the attention of researchers and has led to contradictory results. Most research in creativity has emphasized the role of affective states, mainly positive ones, on creativity levels, namely those resulting from divergent thinking tasks that reveal the unconventional way of thinking in the creative process. However, there are nostudies to date that focus on the impact of affective states on conventional and unconventional thinking, during the same creative process, which consider a singlecreative assessment task. The aim of this experimental study was to analyze the effect of induced affective states on both conventional and unconventional thinkingof creativity in adults by using the TCT-DP (Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production). Method. Seventy-five university students, mostly female, with a meanage of 26.95 years, were randomly assigned into three affect elicitation conditions (pleasant vs. unpleasant vs. neutral). Results. Results indicated that the negativeaffective state led to higher levels of conventional thinking when compared to positive and neutral affective states. However, no significant differences were foundon unconventional thinking across the three conditions. Conclusions. Our results do not support the assumption that the negative affect has a hindering effect oncreativity nor the positive affect increases creativity. Negative affect seems to promote conventional thinking, perhaps due to its cognitive correlates, which canbe manifested in focusing attention and analytic thinking. Practical and theoretical implications for future research on the role of affective states on creativity are discussed
Almeida, L., & Ibérico Nogueira, S. (2010). Estudo preliminar do teste Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP). Psychologica, 52(1), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_52-1_9
Publication
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 367–403. https://doi.org/10.2189/ asqu.2005.50.3.367
Carvalho. J., & Rosa, P. J. (2020). Gender Differences in the Emotional Response and Subjective Sexual Arousal Toward Non-Consensual Sexual Intercourse: A Pupillometric Study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 17(10), 1865-1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.06.018
Devilly G., & O’Donohue, R. (2021) A video is worth a thousand thoughts: comparing a video mood induction procedure to an autobiographical recall technique. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(4), 438-451, https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1997553
DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publications.
Delplanque, S., N’diaye, K., Scherer, K., & Grandjean, D. (2007). Spatial frequencies or emotional effects? Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 165(1), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.05.030
De Dreu, C. K., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.94.5.739
Cosme, G., Rosa, P. J., Lima, C. F., Tavares, V., Scott, S., Chen, S., Wilcockson, T. D. W., Crawford, T. J., & Prata, D. (2021). Pupil dilation reflects the authenticity of received nonverbal vocalizations. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 3733. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83070-x
Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: And sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. APA.
Forgas, J. P. (2000). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Conner, T. S., DeYoung, C. G., & Silvia, P. J. (2016). Everyday creative activity as a path to flourishing. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10 .1080/17439760.2016.1257049
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge Academic.
Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2971
Fiedler, K. (2000). Toward an integrative account of affect and cognition phenomena using the BIAS computer algorithm. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 223–252). Cambridge University Press.
Gamito, P., & Rosa, P. J. (2014). I see you, you see me: Inferring cognitive and emotional processes from gazing behaviour. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Bledow, R., Rosing, K., & Frese, M. (2013). A dynamic perspective on affect and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 432–450. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0894
Galinha, I. C., & Pais-Ribeiro, J. L. (2005). Contribuição para o estudo da versão Portuguesa da Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): II - Estudo psicométrico. Análise Psicológica, 23, 219-227. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.84
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159875
Biss, R. K., Hasher, L., & Thomas, R. C. (2010). Positive mood is associated with the implicit use of distraction. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9156-y
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for mini-c creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79.
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A Meta-Analysis of 25 Years of Mood-Creativity Research: Hedonic Tone, Activation, or Regulatory Focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779-809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815
Baas, M. (2019). In the mood for creativity. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 255-332). Cambridge University Press.
Glaveanu, V. P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E.P., Corazza, G.E., & Montuori, A. (2020). Advancing creativity theory and research: A socio-cultural manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 741-745. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.395
Anderson, S., & Rodin, J. (1989). Is bad news always bad? Cue and feedback effects on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(6), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00067.x
Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 169-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068
2023-07-24T00:00:00Z
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/6497/5201
2023-07-24T00:00:00Z
2023-07-24
2011-2084
2011-7922
10.21500/20112084.6497
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.6497
23
14
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection International Journal of Psychological Research
title ¿Es el afecto negativo tan malo así? El efecto de los estados afectivos en el pensamiento creativo convencional y no convencional en estudiantes universitarios.
spellingShingle ¿Es el afecto negativo tan malo así? El efecto de los estados afectivos en el pensamiento creativo convencional y no convencional en estudiantes universitarios.
Ibérico Nogueira, Sara
Ribeiro, Roberto
Rosa, Pedro J.
Creatividad
TCT-DP
estados afectivos
pensamiento no convencional
pensamiento convencional
seguimiento ocular
Eye Tracking
TCT-DP
affective states
unconventional thinking
conventional thinking
creativity
title_short ¿Es el afecto negativo tan malo así? El efecto de los estados afectivos en el pensamiento creativo convencional y no convencional en estudiantes universitarios.
title_full ¿Es el afecto negativo tan malo así? El efecto de los estados afectivos en el pensamiento creativo convencional y no convencional en estudiantes universitarios.
title_fullStr ¿Es el afecto negativo tan malo así? El efecto de los estados afectivos en el pensamiento creativo convencional y no convencional en estudiantes universitarios.
title_full_unstemmed ¿Es el afecto negativo tan malo así? El efecto de los estados afectivos en el pensamiento creativo convencional y no convencional en estudiantes universitarios.
title_sort ¿es el afecto negativo tan malo así? el efecto de los estados afectivos en el pensamiento creativo convencional y no convencional en estudiantes universitarios.
description Introducción. El papel de los estados afectivos en el proceso creativo ha sido objeto de atención por parte de los investigadores y ha dado lugar a resultadoscontradictorios. La mayor parte de la investigación en creatividad ha hecho hincapié en el papel de los estados afectivos, principalmente los positivos, sobre los nivelesde creatividad. A saber, los resultantes de las tareas de pensamiento divergente que revelan la forma no convencional de pensar en el proceso creativo. Este estudiotuvo como objetivo analizar el efecto de los estados afectivos inducidos en dos dimensiones distintas del pensamiento creativo en adultos. Método. Setenta ycinco voluntarios, en su mayoría mujeres, con una edad media de 26.95 años, fueron asignados aleatoriamente a tres condiciones de elicitación de estados afectivos(agradable vs desagradable vs neutral), justo antes de realizar una tarea de creatividad figurativa. Resultados. Los resultados indicaron que el estado afectivonegativo condujo a niveles más altos de pensamiento convencional. Conclusiones. Nuestros resultados no apoyan ni la hipótesis de que el afecto negativo tiene unefecto perjudicial sobre la creatividad ni la de que el afecto positivo aumenta la creatividad. El afecto negativo parece promover el pensamiento convencional, quizá debido a sus correlatos cognitivos, que pueden manifestarse en la atención focalizada y el pensamiento analítico. Se discuten las implicaciones prácticas y teóricas para futuras investigaciones sobre el papel de los estados afectivos en la creatividad.
description_eng Introduction. The role of affective states on the creative process has been receiving the attention of researchers and has led to contradictory results. Most research in creativity has emphasized the role of affective states, mainly positive ones, on creativity levels, namely those resulting from divergent thinking tasks that reveal the unconventional way of thinking in the creative process. However, there are nostudies to date that focus on the impact of affective states on conventional and unconventional thinking, during the same creative process, which consider a singlecreative assessment task. The aim of this experimental study was to analyze the effect of induced affective states on both conventional and unconventional thinkingof creativity in adults by using the TCT-DP (Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production). Method. Seventy-five university students, mostly female, with a meanage of 26.95 years, were randomly assigned into three affect elicitation conditions (pleasant vs. unpleasant vs. neutral). Results. Results indicated that the negativeaffective state led to higher levels of conventional thinking when compared to positive and neutral affective states. However, no significant differences were foundon unconventional thinking across the three conditions. Conclusions. Our results do not support the assumption that the negative affect has a hindering effect oncreativity nor the positive affect increases creativity. Negative affect seems to promote conventional thinking, perhaps due to its cognitive correlates, which canbe manifested in focusing attention and analytic thinking. Practical and theoretical implications for future research on the role of affective states on creativity are discussed
author Ibérico Nogueira, Sara
Ribeiro, Roberto
Rosa, Pedro J.
author_facet Ibérico Nogueira, Sara
Ribeiro, Roberto
Rosa, Pedro J.
topicspa_str_mv Creatividad
TCT-DP
estados afectivos
pensamiento no convencional
pensamiento convencional
seguimiento ocular
topic Creatividad
TCT-DP
estados afectivos
pensamiento no convencional
pensamiento convencional
seguimiento ocular
Eye Tracking
TCT-DP
affective states
unconventional thinking
conventional thinking
creativity
topic_facet Creatividad
TCT-DP
estados afectivos
pensamiento no convencional
pensamiento convencional
seguimiento ocular
Eye Tracking
TCT-DP
affective states
unconventional thinking
conventional thinking
creativity
citationvolume 16
citationissue 2
citationedition Núm. 2 , Año 2023 : Psychophysiology and Experimental Psychology
publisher Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
ispartofjournal International Journal of Psychological Research
source https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/6497
language Inglés
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
references_eng Leung, A. K. Y., Liou, S., Qiu, L., Kwan, L. Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., & Yong, J. C. (2014). The role of instrumental emotion regulation in the emotions–creativity link: How worries render individuals with high neuroticism more creative. Emotion, 14, 846–856.
Rosa, P. J., Gamito, P., Oliveira J., Morais, D., Pavlovic, M., & Smyth, O. (2016). Uso de eye tracking em realidade virtual não imersiva para avaliação cognitiva. Psicologia, Saúde e Doenças, 17(1), 23-31 https://doi.org/10.15309/15psd170104
Rosa, P. J., Caires, C., Costa, L., Rodelo, L., & Pinto, L. (2014). Affective and Psychophysiological Responses to Erotic Stimuli: Does Color Matter? In P. Gamito and P. J. Rosa (Eds.), I see me, you see me: inferring cognitive and emotional processes from gazing behavior (pp. 171-190). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Rosa, P. J., Esteves, F., & Arriaga, P. (2015). Beyond Traditional Clinical Measurements for Screening Fears and Phobias. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 64(12), 3396-3404. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2015.2450292
Rosa, P. J., Esteves, F., & Arriaga, P. (2012). Ver ou não ver, eis a questão. A relação entre atenção visual selectiva e emoção. In-Mind Português,3(1-4), 15-24.
Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: an integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and psychopathology, 17(3), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050340
Parke, M. R., Seo, M. G., & Sherf, E. N. (2015). Regulating and facilitating: The role of emotional intelligence in maintaining and using positive affect for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 917–934.
Öhman, A., & Wiens, S. (2004). The Concept of an Evolved Fear Module and Cognitive Theories of Anxiety. In A. Manstead, N. Frijda, & A. Fischer (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium (pp. 58–80). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806582.005
Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 30–47.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 44, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/ h0048850.
Fernández (Orgs.), Criatividade e desenvolvimento humano (pp. 63-79). Pimenta Cultural. 10.31560/pimentacultural/2021.596.63-79
Lúcio, P., & Chiodi, S. L. (2021). Avaliação da criatividade: passado, presente e futuro. In J. Berg, C. L. B. Vestena, C., Costa-Lobo, & V. L.
Jaarsveld, S., Lachmann, T., & Leeuwen, C. V. (2012). Creative reasoning across developmental levels: Convergence and divergence in problem creation. Intelligence, 40, 172- 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.01.002
LeDoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. Simon & Schuster.
JASP Team. (2022). JASP (Version 0.16.2) [Computer Software]. University of Amsterdam.
Lai, Y. C., Pen, S. L., Huang, P. S., & Chen, H. C. (2020). The Impact of Affective States and Affective Shifts on Creative Ideation and Evaluation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.440
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report A6. University of Florida.
Kim, K. H. (2006). Is creativity unidimensional or multidimensional? Analyses of the torrance tests of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 251–259. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_2
Rosa, P. J., Luz, F., Júnior, R., Oliveira, J., Morais, D., & Gamito, P. (2020). Adaptive Non-Immersive VR Environment for Eliciting Fear of Cockroaches: A Physiology-Driven Approach Combined with 3D-TV Exposure. International Journal of Psychological Research, 13(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4670
Ibérico Nogueira, S., Almeida, L., & Lima, T. (2018, July). In the path of Two Tracks of Thought: A Structural Model of the Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP), over the school years in Portuguese context. 16th ICIE conference 2018 on Excellence, Innovation, & Creativity in Basic-Higher Education & Psychology - University Paris Descartes, July 3-6, 2018.
Ibérico Nogueira, S., Almeida, L., & Lima, T. S. (2017a). Two Tracks of Thought: A Structural Model of the Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP). Creativity Research Journal, 29(2), 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1303312
Ibérico Nogueira, S., Almeida, M., & Lima, T. (2017b). Construct Validity of the TCT- DP In Different School Levels. In C. Pracana and M. Wang (Eds). Psychology Applications & Developments III (pp. 182-191). InScience Press.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive Affect Facilitates Creative Problem Solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122-1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122
Kaufmann, G., & Vosburg, S. K. (2002). The Effects of Mood on Early and Late Idea Production. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_3
Kaufmann, J. C. (2003). What to measure? A new look at the concept of creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 235-251. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/0031383032000079227
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1-12.
Rosa, P. J., Gamito, P., Oliveira J., Morais, D., Pavlovic, M., Smyth, O., Maia, I., & Gomes, T. (2017). Eye movement analysis and cognitive assessment: the use of comparative visual search tasks in a non-immersive VR application. Methods of Information in Medicine, 56(2), 112-116. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME16-02-0006
Schwarz, N., & Skurnik, I. (2003). Feeling and thinking: Implications for problem solving. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 263–290). Cambridge University Press.
Rosa, P. J., Oliveira, J., Alghazzawi, D., Fardoun, H., & Gamito, P. (2017). Affective and physiological correlates of the perception of unimodal and bimodal emotional stimuli. Psicothema, 29(3), 364-369. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.272
Westermann, R., Spies, K., Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. W. (1996). Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 557–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199607)26:4<557::aid-ejsp769>3.0.co;2-4
Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.545713
Zenasni, F., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: An empirical study. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(1), 61–73. https://doi .org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01080.x
Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. I. (2008). Emotion-Related Traits Moderate the Impact of Emotional State on Creative Performances. Journal of individual Differences, 29(3), 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.29.3.157
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
Wilder, J. (1962), Basimetric Approach (Law Of Initial Value) To Biological Rhythms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 98, 1211-1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb30629.x
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier Academic Press. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714
Watts, L. L., Mcintosh, T. J., Gibson, C., Mulhearn, T. J., Medeiros, K., Mecca, J. T., & Cohen-Charash, Y. (2019). Mild Affective Shifts and Creativity: Effects on Idea Generation, Evaluation, and Implementation Planning. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(4), 985-1001.
Walla, P., & Panksepp, J. (2013). Neuroimaging Helps to Clarify Brain Affective Processing without Necessarily Clarifying Emotions. In K. N. Fountas (Ed.), Novel Frontiers of Advanced Neuroimaging. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/51761
Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1996). Manual of Test for Creative Thinking- Drawing Production (TCT-DP). Harcourt Test.
Uhrig, M. K., Trautmann, N., Baumgärtner, U., Treede, R.-D., Henrich, F., Hiller, W., & Marschall, S. (2016). Emotion elicitation: A comparison of pictures and films. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 180. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00180
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10
To, M. L., Fisher, C. D., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Zou, J. (2021). Feeling differently, creating together: Affect heterogeneity and creativity in project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42, 1228–1243.
Spering, M., Wagener, D., & Funke, J. (2005). The role of emotions in complex problem- solving. Cognition & Emotion, 19(8), 1252–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930500304886.
Shin, Y., Kim, M., & Lee, S. H. (2016). Positive group affective tone and team creative performance and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53, 52–68.
Shavinina, L. V. (2001). A new wave of innovations in Psychology: high intellectual and creative educational multimedia technologies. Review of General Psychology, 5(3), 291-315. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.5.3.291
Ibérico Nogueira, S., & Almeida, A. (2019). Who are they? Creativity and Innovativeness: Featuring Workers. Revista Sul Americana de Psicologia. 7(1), 32-54.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3–4), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2003.9682896.
Russell, J. A., & Bullock, M. (1985). Multidimensional scaling of emotional facial expressions: Similarity from preschoolers to adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(5), 1290–1298. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.5.1290
Ibérico Nogueira, S., Almeida, M., & Souza Lima, T. (2019). Test For Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP): A Revised Factorial Structure In An Adult Sample. In C. Pracana and M. Wang (Eds), Psychology Applications & Developments V (pp. 14-23). InScience Press.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don't: the role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687-697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.687
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press.
Almeida, L., & Ibérico Nogueira, S. (2010). Estudo preliminar do teste Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP). Psychologica, 52(1), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_52-1_9
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 367–403. https://doi.org/10.2189/ asqu.2005.50.3.367
Carvalho. J., & Rosa, P. J. (2020). Gender Differences in the Emotional Response and Subjective Sexual Arousal Toward Non-Consensual Sexual Intercourse: A Pupillometric Study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 17(10), 1865-1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.06.018
Devilly G., & O’Donohue, R. (2021) A video is worth a thousand thoughts: comparing a video mood induction procedure to an autobiographical recall technique. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(4), 438-451, https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1997553
DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publications.
Delplanque, S., N’diaye, K., Scherer, K., & Grandjean, D. (2007). Spatial frequencies or emotional effects? Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 165(1), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.05.030
De Dreu, C. K., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.94.5.739
Cosme, G., Rosa, P. J., Lima, C. F., Tavares, V., Scott, S., Chen, S., Wilcockson, T. D. W., Crawford, T. J., & Prata, D. (2021). Pupil dilation reflects the authenticity of received nonverbal vocalizations. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 3733. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83070-x
Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: And sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. APA.
Forgas, J. P. (2000). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Conner, T. S., DeYoung, C. G., & Silvia, P. J. (2016). Everyday creative activity as a path to flourishing. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10 .1080/17439760.2016.1257049
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge Academic.
Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2971
Fiedler, K. (2000). Toward an integrative account of affect and cognition phenomena using the BIAS computer algorithm. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 223–252). Cambridge University Press.
Gamito, P., & Rosa, P. J. (2014). I see you, you see me: Inferring cognitive and emotional processes from gazing behaviour. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Bledow, R., Rosing, K., & Frese, M. (2013). A dynamic perspective on affect and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 432–450. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0894
Galinha, I. C., & Pais-Ribeiro, J. L. (2005). Contribuição para o estudo da versão Portuguesa da Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): II - Estudo psicométrico. Análise Psicológica, 23, 219-227. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.84
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159875
Biss, R. K., Hasher, L., & Thomas, R. C. (2010). Positive mood is associated with the implicit use of distraction. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9156-y
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for mini-c creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79.
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A Meta-Analysis of 25 Years of Mood-Creativity Research: Hedonic Tone, Activation, or Regulatory Focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779-809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815
Baas, M. (2019). In the mood for creativity. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 255-332). Cambridge University Press.
Glaveanu, V. P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E.P., Corazza, G.E., & Montuori, A. (2020). Advancing creativity theory and research: A socio-cultural manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 741-745. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.395
Anderson, S., & Rodin, J. (1989). Is bad news always bad? Cue and feedback effects on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(6), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00067.x
Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 169-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2023-07-24
date_accessioned 2023-07-24T00:00:00Z
date_available 2023-07-24T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/6497
url_doi https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.6497
issn 2011-2084
eissn 2011-7922
doi 10.21500/20112084.6497
citationstartpage 14
citationendpage 23
url2_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/6497/5201
_version_ 1832800457301426176