Titulo:
Actitudes sobre conducta sexual: análisis exploratorio de un modelo exhaustivo
.
Sumario:
Introducción. Se propuso un modelo teórico de Esquemas Cognitivos Autoorientados sobre Conducta Sexual (ECA-CS) tras una revisión previa de desambiguación sobre la literatura actual de las actitudes sexuales. Una exploracióncuantitativa de la propuesta puede añadir información real sobre la estructura interna y la adecuación de los factores definidos. En consecuencia, el presente estudio pretendió 1) desarrollar un cuestionario basado en la revisión teórica y 2) explorar la estructura del modelo ECA-CS. Método. Se elaboró y evaluó un cuestionario siguiendo los principios teóricos del ECA-CS. Se realizó una encuesta observacionaltransversal en línea. Se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio (AFE) y un análisis de fiabilidad. Resultados.... Ver más
Guardado en:
2011-2084
2011-7922
17
2024-05-08
40
52
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
| id |
metarevistapublica_unisanbuenaventura_internationaljournalofpsychologicalresearch_21-article-6367 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Actitudes sobre conducta sexual: análisis exploratorio de un modelo exhaustivo Comportamiento sexual Actitudes sobre conducta sexual: análisis exploratorio de un modelo exhaustivo actitudes sexuales esquema cognitivo análisis factorial exploratorio creencias sexuales Artículo de revista Introducción. Se propuso un modelo teórico de Esquemas Cognitivos Autoorientados sobre Conducta Sexual (ECA-CS) tras una revisión previa de desambiguación sobre la literatura actual de las actitudes sexuales. Una exploracióncuantitativa de la propuesta puede añadir información real sobre la estructura interna y la adecuación de los factores definidos. En consecuencia, el presente estudio pretendió 1) desarrollar un cuestionario basado en la revisión teórica y 2) explorar la estructura del modelo ECA-CS. Método. Se elaboró y evaluó un cuestionario siguiendo los principios teóricos del ECA-CS. Se realizó una encuesta observacionaltransversal en línea. Se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio (AFE) y un análisis de fiabilidad. Resultados. Se analizó una muestra de 188 sujetos (Edad 18–56; M= 25.27; SD = 6.6) (62 varones, 33.2%). El AFE arrojó 16 factores con valores propios superiores a 1, que explicaban el 67.21% de la varianza (KMO = .672, Barlett’s=3958.7, sig.<.01) (comunalidades de los ítems entre .44 y .80). Se estableció un punto de corte por debajo de .49, incluyendo valores entre .49 y .86. No hubo correlación entre componentes por encima de .20, en un rango de –.19 a .20. Los índices de fiabilidad variaron de .46 a .86. Conclusiones: Se presentó un modelo final de 16 componentes que sigue los principios del ECA-CS. El análisis reveló ciertasmodificaciones a la propuesta teórica, y se logró el objetivo de agregar un marco cuantitativo para especificar empíricamente sus factores. Este resultado constituye un paso adelante en el desarrollo de un modelo integral sobre creencias sexual http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Last access in 2022: https://www.R-project.org/] del Río, F. J., López, D. J., & Cabello, F. (2013). Adaptación del cuestionario Sexual Opinion Survey: Encuesta revisada de opinión sexual. Revista Internacional de Andrología, 11(1), 9-16.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.androl.2012.09.003 Durant, L. E., & Carey, M. P. (2000). Self-administered questionnaires versus face-to-face interviews in assessing sexual behavior in young women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29(4), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1001930202526 Eisinga, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?. International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637-642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3 Fenton, K. A., Johnson, A. M., McManus, S., & Erens, B. (2001). Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 77(2), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.77.2.84 Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But… Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629 Kane, L., Dawson, S. J., Shaughnessy, K., Reissing, E. D., Ouimet, A. J., & Ashbaugh, A. R. (2019). A review of experimental research on anxiety and sexual arousal: Implications for the treatment of sexual dysfunction using cognitive behavioral therapy. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2043808719847371 Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(08), 2207. https://doi.org/ 10.4236/psych.2018.98126 Langhaug, L. F., Sherr, L., & Cowan, F. M. (2010). How to improve the validity of sexual behaviour reporting: systematic review of questionnaire delivery modes in developing countries. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 15(3), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02464.x Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction?. Sex Roles, 52(3), 175-186.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5 Maxwell, J. A., Muise, A., MacDonald, G., Day, L. C., Rosen, N. O., & Impett, E. A. (2017). How implicit theories of sexuality shape sexual and relationship well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(2), 238. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000078 Nobre, P. J., & Pinto‐Gouveia, J. (2006). Dysfunctional sexual beliefs as vulnerability factors for sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex Research, 43(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00224490609552300 Pinney, E. M., Gerrard, M., & Denny, N. W. (1987). The Pinney Sexual Satisfaction Inventory. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498709551359 Redfearn, A. A., & Laner, M. R. (2000). The effects of sexual assault on sexual attitudes. Marriage & Family Review, 30(1-2), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v30n01_08 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Ricci, L., Lanfranchi, J.-B., Lemetayer, F., Rotonda, C., Guillemin, F., Coste, J., & Spitz, E. (2019). Qualitative methods used to generate questionnaire items: A systematic review. Qualitative Health Research, 29(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318783186 Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Sexual dimensions of person description: Beyond or subsumed by the Big Five? Journal of Research in Personality, 34(2), 141-177. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2267 Sánchez-Fuentes, M. del M., & Santos-Iglesias, P. (2016). Sexual satisfaction in Spanish heterosexual couples: testing the Interpersonal Exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 42(3), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2015.1010675 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Sánchez-Fuentes, M. del M., Santos-Iglesias, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2014). A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70038-9 Schroder, K. E. E., Carey, M. P., & Vanable, P. A. (2003). Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 26(2), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2602_03 Shaw, A. M., & Rogge, R. D. (2016). Evaluating and refining the construct of sexual quality with item response theory: development of the quality of Sex Inventory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(2), 249-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0650-x Text http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Velo, C., & Ruíz, M. Á. (2023). A Systematic Review of Beliefs and Attitudes Towards Sexual Behavior: Disambiguation and Classification of Self oriented Cognitive Schemata of Sexual Behavior. Escritos de Psicología-Psychological Writings, 16 (2), 145–155. Brito-Rhor, M. D., Rodríguez-Herráez, B., & Trueba, A. (2020) Propiedades Psicométricas y la Validación del Instrumento de Evaluación del Autoesquema Sexual Femenino en Mujeres Jóvenes Ecuatorianas. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación. 50(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.21865/ridep54.1.07 Publication Blumenberg, C., & Barros, A. J. D. (2018). Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Public Health, 63(6), 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1108-4 International Journal of Psychological Research 1 Núm. 1 , Año 2024 : Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024) Journal article Cognitive Schema Blanc, A., & Rojas, A. J., (2017). Instrumentos de Medida de Actitudes hacia la Sexualidad: Una Revisión Bibliográfica Sistemática. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación - e Avaliação Psicológica, 43(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.21865/ridep43_17 Exploratory Factor Analysis application/pdf Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia) Sexual Beliefs Sexual Attitudes Sexual Behaviour https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/6367 Ruiz Díaz, Miguel Ángel Velo Higueras, Carlos Inglés http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Introduction. A theoretical model of self-oriented cognitive schemata of sexual behaviour (SO-CSSB) was proposed after a previous disambiguation review on the definition and research of sexual attitudes. A quantitative exploration of the proposal may add real-world information regarding the internal structure and the adequacy of the defined factors. Consequently, the present study aims to 1) develop a questionnaire based on the theoretical review and 2) explore the structure of the SO-CSSB model. Method. Following the SO-CSSB principles, a questionnaire was developed and evaluated. An observational cross-sectional online survey was conducted. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a reliability analysis were performed. Results. A study sample, comprised of 188 subjects, was analysed (Age 18–56; M = 25.27; SD = 6.6; 62 male, 33.2%). The EFA yielded 16 factors with eigenvalues above 1, accounting for 67.21% of the variance (KMO = .672, Barlett’s = 3958.7, sig.<.01; item communalities between .44 and .80). Items under .49were cut off, which included values from .49 to .86. There was no correlation between components over .20, in a range from –.19 to .20. Reliability indexes varied from .46 to .86. Conclusion. A final model of 16 components followingthe SO-CSSB principles was presented. The analysis revealed certain modifications to the theoretical proposal, and the objective of adding a quantitative frame toempirically specify its factors was achieved. This outcome constitutes a step forward to developing a comprehensive model on sexual beliefs. Blanc, A., Byers, E. S., & Rojas, A. J. (2018). Evidence for the validity of the Attitudes Toward Sexual Behaviours Scale (ASBS) with Canadian young people. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 27(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2017-0024 17 2024-05-08T00:00:00Z https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/6367/5373 2024-05-08T00:00:00Z 2024-05-08 2011-2084 2011-7922 10.21500/20112084.6367 https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.6367 40 52 |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
International Journal of Psychological Research |
| title |
Actitudes sobre conducta sexual: análisis exploratorio de un modelo exhaustivo |
| spellingShingle |
Actitudes sobre conducta sexual: análisis exploratorio de un modelo exhaustivo Ruiz Díaz, Miguel Ángel Velo Higueras, Carlos Comportamiento sexual actitudes sexuales esquema cognitivo análisis factorial exploratorio creencias sexuales Cognitive Schema Exploratory Factor Analysis Sexual Beliefs Sexual Attitudes Sexual Behaviour |
| title_short |
Actitudes sobre conducta sexual: análisis exploratorio de un modelo exhaustivo |
| title_full |
Actitudes sobre conducta sexual: análisis exploratorio de un modelo exhaustivo |
| title_fullStr |
Actitudes sobre conducta sexual: análisis exploratorio de un modelo exhaustivo |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Actitudes sobre conducta sexual: análisis exploratorio de un modelo exhaustivo |
| title_sort |
actitudes sobre conducta sexual: análisis exploratorio de un modelo exhaustivo |
| description |
Introducción. Se propuso un modelo teórico de Esquemas Cognitivos Autoorientados sobre Conducta Sexual (ECA-CS) tras una revisión previa de desambiguación sobre la literatura actual de las actitudes sexuales. Una exploracióncuantitativa de la propuesta puede añadir información real sobre la estructura interna y la adecuación de los factores definidos. En consecuencia, el presente estudio pretendió 1) desarrollar un cuestionario basado en la revisión teórica y 2) explorar la estructura del modelo ECA-CS. Método. Se elaboró y evaluó un cuestionario siguiendo los principios teóricos del ECA-CS. Se realizó una encuesta observacionaltransversal en línea. Se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio (AFE) y un análisis de fiabilidad. Resultados. Se analizó una muestra de 188 sujetos (Edad 18–56; M= 25.27; SD = 6.6) (62 varones, 33.2%). El AFE arrojó 16 factores con valores propios superiores a 1, que explicaban el 67.21% de la varianza (KMO = .672, Barlett’s=3958.7, sig.<.01) (comunalidades de los ítems entre .44 y .80). Se estableció un punto de corte por debajo de .49, incluyendo valores entre .49 y .86. No hubo correlación entre componentes por encima de .20, en un rango de –.19 a .20. Los índices de fiabilidad variaron de .46 a .86. Conclusiones: Se presentó un modelo final de 16 componentes que sigue los principios del ECA-CS. El análisis reveló ciertasmodificaciones a la propuesta teórica, y se logró el objetivo de agregar un marco cuantitativo para especificar empíricamente sus factores. Este resultado constituye un paso adelante en el desarrollo de un modelo integral sobre creencias sexual
|
| description_eng |
Introduction. A theoretical model of self-oriented cognitive schemata of sexual behaviour (SO-CSSB) was proposed after a previous disambiguation review on the definition and research of sexual attitudes. A quantitative exploration of the proposal may add real-world information regarding the internal structure and the adequacy of the defined factors. Consequently, the present study aims to 1) develop a questionnaire based on the theoretical review and 2) explore the structure of the SO-CSSB model. Method. Following the SO-CSSB principles, a questionnaire was developed and evaluated. An observational cross-sectional online survey was conducted. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a reliability analysis were performed. Results. A study sample, comprised of 188 subjects, was analysed (Age 18–56; M = 25.27; SD = 6.6; 62 male, 33.2%). The EFA yielded 16 factors with eigenvalues above 1, accounting for 67.21% of the variance (KMO = .672, Barlett’s = 3958.7, sig.<.01; item communalities between .44 and .80). Items under .49were cut off, which included values from .49 to .86. There was no correlation between components over .20, in a range from –.19 to .20. Reliability indexes varied from .46 to .86. Conclusion. A final model of 16 components followingthe SO-CSSB principles was presented. The analysis revealed certain modifications to the theoretical proposal, and the objective of adding a quantitative frame toempirically specify its factors was achieved. This outcome constitutes a step forward to developing a comprehensive model on sexual beliefs.
|
| author |
Ruiz Díaz, Miguel Ángel Velo Higueras, Carlos |
| author_facet |
Ruiz Díaz, Miguel Ángel Velo Higueras, Carlos |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Comportamiento sexual actitudes sexuales esquema cognitivo análisis factorial exploratorio creencias sexuales |
| topic |
Comportamiento sexual actitudes sexuales esquema cognitivo análisis factorial exploratorio creencias sexuales Cognitive Schema Exploratory Factor Analysis Sexual Beliefs Sexual Attitudes Sexual Behaviour |
| topic_facet |
Comportamiento sexual actitudes sexuales esquema cognitivo análisis factorial exploratorio creencias sexuales Cognitive Schema Exploratory Factor Analysis Sexual Beliefs Sexual Attitudes Sexual Behaviour |
| citationvolume |
17 |
| citationissue |
1 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 1 , Año 2024 : Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024) |
| publisher |
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia) |
| ispartofjournal |
International Journal of Psychological Research |
| source |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/6367 |
| language |
Inglés |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
| references_eng |
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Last access in 2022: https://www.R-project.org/] del Río, F. J., López, D. J., & Cabello, F. (2013). Adaptación del cuestionario Sexual Opinion Survey: Encuesta revisada de opinión sexual. Revista Internacional de Andrología, 11(1), 9-16.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.androl.2012.09.003 Durant, L. E., & Carey, M. P. (2000). Self-administered questionnaires versus face-to-face interviews in assessing sexual behavior in young women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29(4), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1001930202526 Eisinga, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?. International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637-642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3 Fenton, K. A., Johnson, A. M., McManus, S., & Erens, B. (2001). Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 77(2), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.77.2.84 Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But… Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629 Kane, L., Dawson, S. J., Shaughnessy, K., Reissing, E. D., Ouimet, A. J., & Ashbaugh, A. R. (2019). A review of experimental research on anxiety and sexual arousal: Implications for the treatment of sexual dysfunction using cognitive behavioral therapy. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2043808719847371 Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(08), 2207. https://doi.org/ 10.4236/psych.2018.98126 Langhaug, L. F., Sherr, L., & Cowan, F. M. (2010). How to improve the validity of sexual behaviour reporting: systematic review of questionnaire delivery modes in developing countries. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 15(3), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02464.x Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction?. Sex Roles, 52(3), 175-186.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5 Maxwell, J. A., Muise, A., MacDonald, G., Day, L. C., Rosen, N. O., & Impett, E. A. (2017). How implicit theories of sexuality shape sexual and relationship well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(2), 238. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000078 Nobre, P. J., & Pinto‐Gouveia, J. (2006). Dysfunctional sexual beliefs as vulnerability factors for sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex Research, 43(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00224490609552300 Pinney, E. M., Gerrard, M., & Denny, N. W. (1987). The Pinney Sexual Satisfaction Inventory. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498709551359 Redfearn, A. A., & Laner, M. R. (2000). The effects of sexual assault on sexual attitudes. Marriage & Family Review, 30(1-2), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v30n01_08 Ricci, L., Lanfranchi, J.-B., Lemetayer, F., Rotonda, C., Guillemin, F., Coste, J., & Spitz, E. (2019). Qualitative methods used to generate questionnaire items: A systematic review. Qualitative Health Research, 29(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318783186 Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Sexual dimensions of person description: Beyond or subsumed by the Big Five? Journal of Research in Personality, 34(2), 141-177. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2267 Sánchez-Fuentes, M. del M., & Santos-Iglesias, P. (2016). Sexual satisfaction in Spanish heterosexual couples: testing the Interpersonal Exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 42(3), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2015.1010675 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Sánchez-Fuentes, M. del M., Santos-Iglesias, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2014). A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70038-9 Schroder, K. E. E., Carey, M. P., & Vanable, P. A. (2003). Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 26(2), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2602_03 Shaw, A. M., & Rogge, R. D. (2016). Evaluating and refining the construct of sexual quality with item response theory: development of the quality of Sex Inventory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(2), 249-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0650-x Velo, C., & Ruíz, M. Á. (2023). A Systematic Review of Beliefs and Attitudes Towards Sexual Behavior: Disambiguation and Classification of Self oriented Cognitive Schemata of Sexual Behavior. Escritos de Psicología-Psychological Writings, 16 (2), 145–155. Brito-Rhor, M. D., Rodríguez-Herráez, B., & Trueba, A. (2020) Propiedades Psicométricas y la Validación del Instrumento de Evaluación del Autoesquema Sexual Femenino en Mujeres Jóvenes Ecuatorianas. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación. 50(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.21865/ridep54.1.07 Blumenberg, C., & Barros, A. J. D. (2018). Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Public Health, 63(6), 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1108-4 Blanc, A., & Rojas, A. J., (2017). Instrumentos de Medida de Actitudes hacia la Sexualidad: Una Revisión Bibliográfica Sistemática. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación - e Avaliação Psicológica, 43(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.21865/ridep43_17 Blanc, A., Byers, E. S., & Rojas, A. J. (2018). Evidence for the validity of the Attitudes Toward Sexual Behaviours Scale (ASBS) with Canadian young people. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 27(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2017-0024 |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2024-05-08 |
| date_accessioned |
2024-05-08T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2024-05-08T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/6367 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.6367 |
| issn |
2011-2084 |
| eissn |
2011-7922 |
| doi |
10.21500/20112084.6367 |
| citationstartpage |
40 |
| citationendpage |
52 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/6367/5373 |
| _version_ |
1832800449048084480 |