Decisiones económicas, atractivo y competencia intrasexual durante el ciclo menstrual en el juego del ultimátum
Titulo:

Decisiones económicas, atractivo y competencia intrasexual durante el ciclo menstrual en el juego del ultimátum
.

Sumario:

Introducción: parece ser que, en su fase de mayor fertilidad, la competenciaintrasexual de la mujer (con mujeres atractivas y que viven cerca) aumentapor el acceso a recursos, estatus y parejas biológicamente deseables. Objetivo:comparar las decisiones económicas (DE) en las fases ovulatoria (FO) y lútea(FL) del ciclo menstrual (CM) con exposición a dos estímulos: fotografía de unamujer de mayor atractivo y fotografía de una mujer de menor atractivo, a travésdel juego del ultimátum (UG). Metodología:la investigación tuvo un diseño crosssectional entre sujetos para ver diferencia de grupos mediante contrastede hipótesis. El muestreo fue probabilístico, con una muestra de 100 mujeresheterosexuales, estudiantes de una universidad pública con u... Ver más

Guardado en:

International Journal of Psychological Research

2011-2084

2011-7922

Villada Zapata, Johny

Sánchez Escudero, Juan Pablo

Galindo-Caballero, Óscar

Alzate-Pamplona, Fraidy-Alonso

UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA

10.21500/20112084.5919

16

2023-04-24

6

16

Colombia

juego del ultimatum

competencia intrasexual

decisiones económicas

experimento social

progesterona

estrógenos

fase lútea

fase ovulatoria

ciclo menstrual

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

id metarevistapublica_unisanbuenaventura_internationaljournalofpsychologicalresearch_21-article-5919
record_format ojs
spelling Decisiones económicas, atractivo y competencia intrasexual durante el ciclo menstrual en el juego del ultimátum
Guéguen, N. (2012). Makeup and Menstrual Cycle: Near Ovulation, Women Use More Cosmetics. Psychological Record, 62 (3), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395819
Lucas, M., Koff, E., & Skeath, S. (2007). Pilot Study of Relationship Between Fertility Risk and Bargaining. Psychological Reports, 101 (1), 302–310.https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.101.1.302-310
Lucas, M., & Koff, E. (2013). How Conception Risk Affects Competition and Cooperation with Attractive Women and Men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34 (1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.08.001
Lobmaier, J. S., Bobst, C., & Probst, F. (2016). Can Women Detect Cues to Ovulation in Other Women’s Faces? Biology Letters, 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0638
Lazzaro, S. C., Rutledge, R. B., Burghart, D. R., & Glimcher, P. W. (2016). The Impact of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Economic Choice and Rationality. PLoS ONE, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144080
Kurath, J. D., & Mata, R. (2018). Individual Differences in Risk Taking and Endogeneous Levels of Testosterone, Estradiol, and Cortisol: A Systematic Literature Search and Three Independent Meta-Analyses. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 90, 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.003
Knight,E. L., Sarkar, A.,Prasad, S. &Mehta,P. H. (2020). Beyond the Challenge Hypothesis: The Emergence of the Dual-Hormone Hypothesis and Recommendations for Future Research. Hormones and Behavior, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104657
Kaighobadi, F., & Stevens, J. R. (2013). Does Fertility Status Influence Impulsivity and Risk Taking in Human Females? Adaptive Influences on Intertemporal Choice and Risky Decision Making. Evolutionary Psychology, 11 (3), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100314
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644-1655. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024700
Hevia-Orozco, J., Sanz-Martín, A., Hidalgo-Aguirre, R. M., Hernández-González, M., & Guevara, M. A. (2014). Evaluación de la toma de decisiones sociales a través del Ultimatum Game versión computarizada. Eneurobiología, 5 (10), 1–11
Haselton, M. G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E. G., BleskeRechek, A., & Frederick, D. A. (2007). Ovulatory Shifts in Human Female Ornamentation: Near Ovulation, Women Dress to Impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51 (1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.07.007
Hardy, B. (2019). Steroid Hormones in Social Science Research. In G. Foster (Ed.), Biophysical measurement in experimental social science research (1.a, pp. 105–148). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813092-6.00008-3
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3 (4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
Güth, W., & Kocher, M. G. (2014). More than Thirty Years of Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments: Motives, Variations, and a Survey of the Recent Literature. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 108, 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.06.006
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant Benevolence and Conspicuous Consumption: When Romantic Motives Elicit Strategic Costly Signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93 (1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.85
Mehta, P. H., Mor, S., Yap, A. J., & Prasad, S. (2015). Dual-Hormone Changes Are Related to Bargaining Performance. Psychological Science, 26 (6), 866–876.https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615572905
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) Facial Attractiveness and Sexual Selection: The Role of Symmetry and Averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108 (3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233
Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do Women’s Mate Preferences Change Across the Ovulatory Cycle? A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 140 (5), 1205–1259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035438
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (2008). Human Oestrus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275 (1638), 991–1000. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1425
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual Cycle Variation in Women’s Preferences for the Scent of Symmetrical Men. Proceedings of theRoyal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265 (1399), 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0380
Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., Welling, L. L. M., Gildersleeve, K., Pillsworth, E. G., Burriss, R. P.,Larson, C. M., & Puts, D. A. (2016). How Valid are Assessments of Conception Probability in Ovulatory Cycle Research? Evaluations, Recommendations, and Theoretical Implications. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37 (2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.09.001
Galindo-Caballero, Ó., Alzate-Pamplona, F. .-., Gangestad, S., & Cruz, J. E. (n.d.). A review and pcurve analysis of research on the menstrual cycle correlates of consumer preferences and economic decisions. Hormones; Behavior.
Fisher, M. L. (2004). Female Intrasexual Competition Decreases Female Facial Attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271 (SUPPL. 5), 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0160.
Eisenbruch, A. B., & Roney, J. R. (2016). Conception Risk and the Ultimatum Game: When Fertility is High, Women Demand More. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 272–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.047
Durante, K. M., Li, N. P., & Haselton, M. G. (2008). Changes in Women’s Choice of Dress Across the Ovulatory Cycle: Naturalistic and Laboratory Task-Based Evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34 (11), 1451–1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208323103
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., & Ulu, S. S. (2020). The Effect of Fertility on Loss Aversion. Journal of Business Research, 120, 599–607.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.043
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Hill, S. E., Perilloux, C., & Li, N. P. (2011). Ovulation, Female Competition, and Product Choice: Hormonal Influences on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (6), 921–934. https://doi.org/10.1086/656575
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Cantú, S. M., & Simpson, J. A. (2014). Money, Status, and the Ovulatory Cycle. Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0327
Decisiones económicas, atractivo y competencia intrasexual durante el ciclo menstrual en el juego del ultimátum
Mafra, A. L., Varella, M. A. C., Defelipe, R. P., Anchieta, N. M., Almeida, C. A. G., & Valentova, J. V. (2020). Makeup Usage in Women as a Tactic to Attract Mates and Compete with Rivals. Personality and Individual Differences, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110042
Mehta, P. H., & Prasad, S. (2015). The Dual-Hormone Hypothesis: A Brief Review and Future Research Agenda. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences,3, 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.008
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2000, July 24). Ley 599. Por la cual se expide el Código Penal. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0599_2000.html
Van Damme, E., Binmore, K. G., Roth, A. E., Samuelson, L., Winter, E., Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A., Dufwenberg, M., Kirchsteiger, G., Gneezy, U., Kocher, M. G., Sutter, M., Sanfey, A. G.,Kliemt, H., Selten, R., Nagel, R., & Azar, O. H.(2014). How Werner Güth’s Ultimatum Game Shaped our Understanding of Social Behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 108, 292–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.10.014
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Zhuang, J.-Y., & Wang, J.-X. (2014). Women Ornament Themselves for Intrasexual Competition near Ovulation, but for Intersexual Attraction in Luteal Phase. PLoS ONE, 9 (9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106407
Zethraeus, N., Kocoska-Maras, L., Ellingsen, T., Schoultz, B., Hirschberg, A. L., & Johannesson, M. (2009). A Randomized Trial of the Effect of Estrogen and Testosterone on Economic Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (16), 6535–6538. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812757106
Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D. B., Weinberg, C. R., Trussell, J., & Baird, D. D. (2001). Likelihood of Conception with a Single Act of Intercourse: Providing Benchmark Rates for Assessment of Post-Coital Contraceptives. Contraception, 63 (4), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00191-3
Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D., & Baird, D. D. (2000). The Timing of the “fertile window” in the Menstrual Cycle: Day Specific Estimates from a Prospective Study. British Medical Journal, 321 (7271),1259–1262. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1259
Wilcox, A. J., Day Baird, D., Dunson, D. B., McConnaughey, D. R., Kesner, J. S., & Weinberg, C. R. (2004). On the Frequency of Intercourse around Ovulation: Evidence for Biological Influences. Human Reproduction, 19 (7), 1539–1543. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh305
Varella, M. A. C., Valentova, J. V., Fernández, A. M., & Fisher, M. L. (2015). Evolution of Artistic and Aesthetic Propensities Through Female Competitive Ornamentation. In M. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook ofWomen and Competition (pp.757–784). Oxford Library of Psychology.
Unesco. (2005). Declaración universal sobre bioética y derechos humanos. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000146180_spa
Mehta, P. H., Welker, K. M., Zilioli, S., & Carré, J. M. (2015). Testosterone and Cortisol Jointly Modulate Risk-Taking. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 56,88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.02.023
Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous Consumption as a Sexual Signaling System. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100 (4), 664–680.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021669
Stanton, S. J. (2017). The Role of Testosterone and Estrogen in Consumer Behavior and Social & Economic Decision Making: A Review. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.11.006
Schipper, B. C. (2015). Sex hormones and competitive bidding. Management Science, 61 (2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1959
Saad, G., & Stenstrom, E. (2012). Calories, Beauty, and Ovulation: The Effects of the Menstrual Cycle on Food and Appearance-Related Consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22 (1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.001
Rodríguez Ruiz, C. (2019). Efecto de variables asociadas a hormonas sexuales en el comportamiento prosocial humano en distintos contextos experimentales. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Rhodes, G. (2006). The Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57,199–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
Rhode, D. L. (2010). The Beauty Bias: The Injustice of Appearance in Life and Law. Oxford University Press.
Regan, P. C. (1996). Rhythms of Desire: The Association Between Menstrual Cycle Phases and Female Sexual Desire. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 5 (3), 145–156. https://doi.org/https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2s2.00030475027&partnerID=40&md5=5e06ac9b05b9d7150b6cf2c89d83a781
Probst, F., Golle, J., Lory, V., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2018).Reactive Aggression Tracks Within-Participant Changes in Women’s Salivary Testosterone. Aggressive Behavior, 44 (4), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21757
Patzer, G. L. (1985). The Physical Attractiveness Phenomena. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0202-6 Pearson, M., & Schipper, B. C. (2013). Menstrual Cycle and Competitive Bidding. Games and Economic Behavior, 78 (1), 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.008
Nikiforidis, L., Arsena, A. R., & Durante, K. M. (2017). The Effect of Fertility on Women’s Intrasexual Competition. In M. Fisher (Ed.), The oxford handbook of women and competition (1a, pp. 397–410). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.23
Necka, E. A., Puts, D. A., Dimitroff, S. J., & Norman, G. J. (2016). Other Women’s Fertility Moderates Female Resource Distribution Across the Menstrual Cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37 (5), 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.03.003
Ministerio de Salud. (1993, October 4). Resolución 008430. Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. DO. 49427. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430-DE-1993.PDF
Mihm, M., Gangooly, S., & Muttukrishna, S. (2011).The Normal Menstrual Cycle in Women. Animal Reproduction Science, 124 (3–4), 229–236.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.030
Cook, C. J., & Crewther, B. T. (2019). Within- and Between-Person Variation in Morning Testosterone is Associated with Economic Risk-Related Decisions in Athletic Women Across the Menstrual Cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 112, 77– 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.04.007
Derntl, B., Pintzinger, N., Kryspin-Exner, I., & Schöpf, V. (2014). The Impact of Sex Hormone Concentrations on Decision-Making in Females and Males. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8 (OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00352
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1982, February 19). Ley 23. Sobre derechos de autor. Diario Oficial 35.499. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.phpi=3431#::text=Esta%20Ley%20protege%20exclusivamente%20la,obras%20literarias%2C%20cient%C3%ADficas%20y%20art%C3%ADsticas
juego del ultimatum
text/html
text/xml
text/xml
application/pdf
application/pdf
Colegio Colombiano de Psicólogos. (2009). Deontología y Bioética del ejercicio de la Psicología en Colombia. Colegio Colombiano de Psicólogos.
Artículo de revista
competencia intrasexual
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/5919
decisiones económicas
experimento social
progesterona
estrógenos
fase lútea
fase ovulatoria
ciclo menstrual
Introducción: parece ser que, en su fase de mayor fertilidad, la competenciaintrasexual de la mujer (con mujeres atractivas y que viven cerca) aumentapor el acceso a recursos, estatus y parejas biológicamente deseables. Objetivo:comparar las decisiones económicas (DE) en las fases ovulatoria (FO) y lútea(FL) del ciclo menstrual (CM) con exposición a dos estímulos: fotografía de unamujer de mayor atractivo y fotografía de una mujer de menor atractivo, a travésdel juego del ultimátum (UG). Metodología:la investigación tuvo un diseño crosssectional entre sujetos para ver diferencia de grupos mediante contrastede hipótesis. El muestreo fue probabilístico, con una muestra de 100 mujeresheterosexuales, estudiantes de una universidad pública con un rango de edadde 18 a 24 años, con CM regulares, que no usaran métodos anticonceptivos hormonales y no tuvieran ninguna afección endocrina. Resultados: las fasesdel CM no tuvieron efectos sobre las DE; las mujeres se comportaron de forma similar en sus decisiones, sin importar la fase del ciclo en la que se encontrabano el tipo de estímulo al que fueron expuestas. Conclusión: las FO y FL no afectan las DE de las mujeres cuando son expuestas a un estímulo atractivo. La discusión se hace a la luz de la teoría evolutiva de la hipótesis del cambio ovulatorio.
text/html
Publication
Catena, T. M., Simmons, Z. L., & Roney, J. R. (2019). Do Women’s Faces Become more Attractive near Ovulation? Hormones and Behavior, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.07.008
Alzate-Pamplona, F.-A. (2020). Decisiones económicas en los cambios hormonales de la mujer. Editorial Bonaventuriana. https://doi.org/10.21500/EB.9789588474915
Chen, Y., Katuˇaˇcák, P., & Ozdenoren, E. (2013). Why can’t a woman bid more like a man? Games and Economic Behavior, 77 (1), 181–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.002
American Psychological Association–APA. (2003). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. APA.
Asociación Médica Mundial. (2013). Declaración de Helsinki. Principios éticos para las investigaciones con seres humanos. Asociación Médica Mundial. https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/
Barel, E., Shahrabani, S., & Tzischinsky, O. (2017). Sex Hormone/Cortisol Ratios Differentially Modulate Risk-Taking in Men and Women. Evolutionary Psychology, 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917697333
Español
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Beall, A. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2013). Women Are More Likely to Wear Red or Pink at Peak Fertility. Psychological Science, 24 (9), 1837–1841. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613476045
Buffet, N. C., Djakoure, C., Maitre, S. C., & Bouchard, P. (1998). Regulation of the Human Menstrual Cycle. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 19 (3), 151–186. https://doi.org/10.1006/frne.1998.0167
Buser, T. (2012). Digit ratios, the Menstrual Cycle and Social Preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 76 (2), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.07.006
Casto, K. V., & Prasad, S. (2017). Recommendations for the study of women in hormones and competition research. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.05.009
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408
Allen, A. M., McRae-Clark, A. L., Carlson, S., Saladin, M. E., Gray, K. M., Wetherington, C. L., McKee, S. A., & Allen, S. S. (2016). Determining Menstrual Phase in Human Biobehavioral Research. A Review with Recommendations. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 24 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000057
Journal article
Ovulatory Phase
Villada Zapata, Johny
Sánchez Escudero, Juan Pablo
Galindo-Caballero, Óscar
Alzate-Pamplona, Fraidy-Alonso
Introduction: it seems that, in the phase of greatest fertility, women’s intrasexualcompetition (toward attractive women who live nearby) increases due to access to resources, status, and biologically desirable partners. Objective: to comparethe economic decisions (ED) during the ovulatory (OP) and luteal (LP) phasesof the menstrual cycle (MC) with exposure to two stimuli: a photograph of amore attractive woman and a photograph of a less attractive woman, throughthe ultimatum game (UG). Methodology: the research followed a cross-sectional design between subjects to see group differences by contrasting hypotheses. The sampling was probabilistic, with a sample of 100 heterosexual women, students at a public university with an age range of 18 to 24 years, with regular MC, who did not use hormonal contraceptive methods and did not have any endocrine condition. The inverse counting method with confirmation was applied to identify CM phases; and the UG to evaluate the DE. Results: the phases of the MC had no effect on the ED; the women behaved similarly in their decisions, regardless ofthe phase of the cycle they were in or the type of stimulus to which they were exposed. Conclusion: OP and LP do not affect the ED of women when they are exposed to an attractive stimulus. The discussion is made considering the evolutionary theory of the ovulatory shift hypothesis.
Menstrual Cycle
Luteal Phase
Estrogens
Progesterone
Intrasexual Competition
Attractiveness
Economic Decisions
Ultimatum Game
16
1
Núm. 1 , Año 2023 : Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023)
International Journal of Psychological Research
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
2023-04-24
2011-2084
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5919
6
16
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5919/5051
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5919/5067
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5919/5066
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5919/5055
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5919/5054
2011-7922
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5919/5036
2023-04-24T19:34:48Z
2023-04-24T19:34:48Z
10.21500/20112084.5919
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection International Journal of Psychological Research
title Decisiones económicas, atractivo y competencia intrasexual durante el ciclo menstrual en el juego del ultimátum
spellingShingle Decisiones económicas, atractivo y competencia intrasexual durante el ciclo menstrual en el juego del ultimátum
Villada Zapata, Johny
Sánchez Escudero, Juan Pablo
Galindo-Caballero, Óscar
Alzate-Pamplona, Fraidy-Alonso
juego del ultimatum
competencia intrasexual
decisiones económicas
experimento social
progesterona
estrógenos
fase lútea
fase ovulatoria
ciclo menstrual
Ovulatory Phase
Menstrual Cycle
Luteal Phase
Estrogens
Progesterone
Intrasexual Competition
Attractiveness
Economic Decisions
Ultimatum Game
title_short Decisiones económicas, atractivo y competencia intrasexual durante el ciclo menstrual en el juego del ultimátum
title_full Decisiones económicas, atractivo y competencia intrasexual durante el ciclo menstrual en el juego del ultimátum
title_fullStr Decisiones económicas, atractivo y competencia intrasexual durante el ciclo menstrual en el juego del ultimátum
title_full_unstemmed Decisiones económicas, atractivo y competencia intrasexual durante el ciclo menstrual en el juego del ultimátum
title_sort decisiones económicas, atractivo y competencia intrasexual durante el ciclo menstrual en el juego del ultimátum
description Introducción: parece ser que, en su fase de mayor fertilidad, la competenciaintrasexual de la mujer (con mujeres atractivas y que viven cerca) aumentapor el acceso a recursos, estatus y parejas biológicamente deseables. Objetivo:comparar las decisiones económicas (DE) en las fases ovulatoria (FO) y lútea(FL) del ciclo menstrual (CM) con exposición a dos estímulos: fotografía de unamujer de mayor atractivo y fotografía de una mujer de menor atractivo, a travésdel juego del ultimátum (UG). Metodología:la investigación tuvo un diseño crosssectional entre sujetos para ver diferencia de grupos mediante contrastede hipótesis. El muestreo fue probabilístico, con una muestra de 100 mujeresheterosexuales, estudiantes de una universidad pública con un rango de edadde 18 a 24 años, con CM regulares, que no usaran métodos anticonceptivos hormonales y no tuvieran ninguna afección endocrina. Resultados: las fasesdel CM no tuvieron efectos sobre las DE; las mujeres se comportaron de forma similar en sus decisiones, sin importar la fase del ciclo en la que se encontrabano el tipo de estímulo al que fueron expuestas. Conclusión: las FO y FL no afectan las DE de las mujeres cuando son expuestas a un estímulo atractivo. La discusión se hace a la luz de la teoría evolutiva de la hipótesis del cambio ovulatorio.
description_eng Introduction: it seems that, in the phase of greatest fertility, women’s intrasexualcompetition (toward attractive women who live nearby) increases due to access to resources, status, and biologically desirable partners. Objective: to comparethe economic decisions (ED) during the ovulatory (OP) and luteal (LP) phasesof the menstrual cycle (MC) with exposure to two stimuli: a photograph of amore attractive woman and a photograph of a less attractive woman, throughthe ultimatum game (UG). Methodology: the research followed a cross-sectional design between subjects to see group differences by contrasting hypotheses. The sampling was probabilistic, with a sample of 100 heterosexual women, students at a public university with an age range of 18 to 24 years, with regular MC, who did not use hormonal contraceptive methods and did not have any endocrine condition. The inverse counting method with confirmation was applied to identify CM phases; and the UG to evaluate the DE. Results: the phases of the MC had no effect on the ED; the women behaved similarly in their decisions, regardless ofthe phase of the cycle they were in or the type of stimulus to which they were exposed. Conclusion: OP and LP do not affect the ED of women when they are exposed to an attractive stimulus. The discussion is made considering the evolutionary theory of the ovulatory shift hypothesis.
author Villada Zapata, Johny
Sánchez Escudero, Juan Pablo
Galindo-Caballero, Óscar
Alzate-Pamplona, Fraidy-Alonso
author_facet Villada Zapata, Johny
Sánchez Escudero, Juan Pablo
Galindo-Caballero, Óscar
Alzate-Pamplona, Fraidy-Alonso
topicspa_str_mv juego del ultimatum
competencia intrasexual
decisiones económicas
experimento social
progesterona
estrógenos
fase lútea
fase ovulatoria
ciclo menstrual
topic juego del ultimatum
competencia intrasexual
decisiones económicas
experimento social
progesterona
estrógenos
fase lútea
fase ovulatoria
ciclo menstrual
Ovulatory Phase
Menstrual Cycle
Luteal Phase
Estrogens
Progesterone
Intrasexual Competition
Attractiveness
Economic Decisions
Ultimatum Game
topic_facet juego del ultimatum
competencia intrasexual
decisiones económicas
experimento social
progesterona
estrógenos
fase lútea
fase ovulatoria
ciclo menstrual
Ovulatory Phase
Menstrual Cycle
Luteal Phase
Estrogens
Progesterone
Intrasexual Competition
Attractiveness
Economic Decisions
Ultimatum Game
citationvolume 16
citationissue 1
citationedition Núm. 1 , Año 2023 : Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023)
publisher Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
ispartofjournal International Journal of Psychological Research
source https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/5919
language Español
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
references Guéguen, N. (2012). Makeup and Menstrual Cycle: Near Ovulation, Women Use More Cosmetics. Psychological Record, 62 (3), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395819
Lucas, M., Koff, E., & Skeath, S. (2007). Pilot Study of Relationship Between Fertility Risk and Bargaining. Psychological Reports, 101 (1), 302–310.https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.101.1.302-310
Lucas, M., & Koff, E. (2013). How Conception Risk Affects Competition and Cooperation with Attractive Women and Men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34 (1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.08.001
Lobmaier, J. S., Bobst, C., & Probst, F. (2016). Can Women Detect Cues to Ovulation in Other Women’s Faces? Biology Letters, 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0638
Lazzaro, S. C., Rutledge, R. B., Burghart, D. R., & Glimcher, P. W. (2016). The Impact of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Economic Choice and Rationality. PLoS ONE, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144080
Kurath, J. D., & Mata, R. (2018). Individual Differences in Risk Taking and Endogeneous Levels of Testosterone, Estradiol, and Cortisol: A Systematic Literature Search and Three Independent Meta-Analyses. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 90, 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.003
Knight,E. L., Sarkar, A.,Prasad, S. &Mehta,P. H. (2020). Beyond the Challenge Hypothesis: The Emergence of the Dual-Hormone Hypothesis and Recommendations for Future Research. Hormones and Behavior, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104657
Kaighobadi, F., & Stevens, J. R. (2013). Does Fertility Status Influence Impulsivity and Risk Taking in Human Females? Adaptive Influences on Intertemporal Choice and Risky Decision Making. Evolutionary Psychology, 11 (3), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100314
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644-1655. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024700
Hevia-Orozco, J., Sanz-Martín, A., Hidalgo-Aguirre, R. M., Hernández-González, M., & Guevara, M. A. (2014). Evaluación de la toma de decisiones sociales a través del Ultimatum Game versión computarizada. Eneurobiología, 5 (10), 1–11
Haselton, M. G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E. G., BleskeRechek, A., & Frederick, D. A. (2007). Ovulatory Shifts in Human Female Ornamentation: Near Ovulation, Women Dress to Impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51 (1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.07.007
Hardy, B. (2019). Steroid Hormones in Social Science Research. In G. Foster (Ed.), Biophysical measurement in experimental social science research (1.a, pp. 105–148). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813092-6.00008-3
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3 (4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
Güth, W., & Kocher, M. G. (2014). More than Thirty Years of Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments: Motives, Variations, and a Survey of the Recent Literature. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 108, 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.06.006
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant Benevolence and Conspicuous Consumption: When Romantic Motives Elicit Strategic Costly Signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93 (1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.85
Mehta, P. H., Mor, S., Yap, A. J., & Prasad, S. (2015). Dual-Hormone Changes Are Related to Bargaining Performance. Psychological Science, 26 (6), 866–876.https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615572905
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) Facial Attractiveness and Sexual Selection: The Role of Symmetry and Averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108 (3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233
Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do Women’s Mate Preferences Change Across the Ovulatory Cycle? A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 140 (5), 1205–1259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035438
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (2008). Human Oestrus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275 (1638), 991–1000. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1425
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual Cycle Variation in Women’s Preferences for the Scent of Symmetrical Men. Proceedings of theRoyal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265 (1399), 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0380
Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., Welling, L. L. M., Gildersleeve, K., Pillsworth, E. G., Burriss, R. P.,Larson, C. M., & Puts, D. A. (2016). How Valid are Assessments of Conception Probability in Ovulatory Cycle Research? Evaluations, Recommendations, and Theoretical Implications. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37 (2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.09.001
Galindo-Caballero, Ó., Alzate-Pamplona, F. .-., Gangestad, S., & Cruz, J. E. (n.d.). A review and pcurve analysis of research on the menstrual cycle correlates of consumer preferences and economic decisions. Hormones; Behavior.
Fisher, M. L. (2004). Female Intrasexual Competition Decreases Female Facial Attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271 (SUPPL. 5), 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0160.
Eisenbruch, A. B., & Roney, J. R. (2016). Conception Risk and the Ultimatum Game: When Fertility is High, Women Demand More. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 272–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.047
Durante, K. M., Li, N. P., & Haselton, M. G. (2008). Changes in Women’s Choice of Dress Across the Ovulatory Cycle: Naturalistic and Laboratory Task-Based Evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34 (11), 1451–1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208323103
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., & Ulu, S. S. (2020). The Effect of Fertility on Loss Aversion. Journal of Business Research, 120, 599–607.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.043
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Hill, S. E., Perilloux, C., & Li, N. P. (2011). Ovulation, Female Competition, and Product Choice: Hormonal Influences on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (6), 921–934. https://doi.org/10.1086/656575
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Cantú, S. M., & Simpson, J. A. (2014). Money, Status, and the Ovulatory Cycle. Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0327
Mafra, A. L., Varella, M. A. C., Defelipe, R. P., Anchieta, N. M., Almeida, C. A. G., & Valentova, J. V. (2020). Makeup Usage in Women as a Tactic to Attract Mates and Compete with Rivals. Personality and Individual Differences, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110042
Mehta, P. H., & Prasad, S. (2015). The Dual-Hormone Hypothesis: A Brief Review and Future Research Agenda. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences,3, 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.008
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2000, July 24). Ley 599. Por la cual se expide el Código Penal. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0599_2000.html
Van Damme, E., Binmore, K. G., Roth, A. E., Samuelson, L., Winter, E., Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A., Dufwenberg, M., Kirchsteiger, G., Gneezy, U., Kocher, M. G., Sutter, M., Sanfey, A. G.,Kliemt, H., Selten, R., Nagel, R., & Azar, O. H.(2014). How Werner Güth’s Ultimatum Game Shaped our Understanding of Social Behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 108, 292–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.10.014
Zhuang, J.-Y., & Wang, J.-X. (2014). Women Ornament Themselves for Intrasexual Competition near Ovulation, but for Intersexual Attraction in Luteal Phase. PLoS ONE, 9 (9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106407
Zethraeus, N., Kocoska-Maras, L., Ellingsen, T., Schoultz, B., Hirschberg, A. L., & Johannesson, M. (2009). A Randomized Trial of the Effect of Estrogen and Testosterone on Economic Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (16), 6535–6538. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812757106
Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D. B., Weinberg, C. R., Trussell, J., & Baird, D. D. (2001). Likelihood of Conception with a Single Act of Intercourse: Providing Benchmark Rates for Assessment of Post-Coital Contraceptives. Contraception, 63 (4), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00191-3
Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D., & Baird, D. D. (2000). The Timing of the “fertile window” in the Menstrual Cycle: Day Specific Estimates from a Prospective Study. British Medical Journal, 321 (7271),1259–1262. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1259
Wilcox, A. J., Day Baird, D., Dunson, D. B., McConnaughey, D. R., Kesner, J. S., & Weinberg, C. R. (2004). On the Frequency of Intercourse around Ovulation: Evidence for Biological Influences. Human Reproduction, 19 (7), 1539–1543. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh305
Varella, M. A. C., Valentova, J. V., Fernández, A. M., & Fisher, M. L. (2015). Evolution of Artistic and Aesthetic Propensities Through Female Competitive Ornamentation. In M. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook ofWomen and Competition (pp.757–784). Oxford Library of Psychology.
Unesco. (2005). Declaración universal sobre bioética y derechos humanos. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000146180_spa
Mehta, P. H., Welker, K. M., Zilioli, S., & Carré, J. M. (2015). Testosterone and Cortisol Jointly Modulate Risk-Taking. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 56,88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.02.023
Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous Consumption as a Sexual Signaling System. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100 (4), 664–680.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021669
Stanton, S. J. (2017). The Role of Testosterone and Estrogen in Consumer Behavior and Social & Economic Decision Making: A Review. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.11.006
Schipper, B. C. (2015). Sex hormones and competitive bidding. Management Science, 61 (2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1959
Saad, G., & Stenstrom, E. (2012). Calories, Beauty, and Ovulation: The Effects of the Menstrual Cycle on Food and Appearance-Related Consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22 (1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.001
Rodríguez Ruiz, C. (2019). Efecto de variables asociadas a hormonas sexuales en el comportamiento prosocial humano en distintos contextos experimentales. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Rhodes, G. (2006). The Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57,199–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
Rhode, D. L. (2010). The Beauty Bias: The Injustice of Appearance in Life and Law. Oxford University Press.
Regan, P. C. (1996). Rhythms of Desire: The Association Between Menstrual Cycle Phases and Female Sexual Desire. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 5 (3), 145–156. https://doi.org/https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2s2.00030475027&partnerID=40&md5=5e06ac9b05b9d7150b6cf2c89d83a781
Probst, F., Golle, J., Lory, V., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2018).Reactive Aggression Tracks Within-Participant Changes in Women’s Salivary Testosterone. Aggressive Behavior, 44 (4), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21757
Patzer, G. L. (1985). The Physical Attractiveness Phenomena. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0202-6 Pearson, M., & Schipper, B. C. (2013). Menstrual Cycle and Competitive Bidding. Games and Economic Behavior, 78 (1), 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.008
Nikiforidis, L., Arsena, A. R., & Durante, K. M. (2017). The Effect of Fertility on Women’s Intrasexual Competition. In M. Fisher (Ed.), The oxford handbook of women and competition (1a, pp. 397–410). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.23
Necka, E. A., Puts, D. A., Dimitroff, S. J., & Norman, G. J. (2016). Other Women’s Fertility Moderates Female Resource Distribution Across the Menstrual Cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37 (5), 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.03.003
Ministerio de Salud. (1993, October 4). Resolución 008430. Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. DO. 49427. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430-DE-1993.PDF
Mihm, M., Gangooly, S., & Muttukrishna, S. (2011).The Normal Menstrual Cycle in Women. Animal Reproduction Science, 124 (3–4), 229–236.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.030
Cook, C. J., & Crewther, B. T. (2019). Within- and Between-Person Variation in Morning Testosterone is Associated with Economic Risk-Related Decisions in Athletic Women Across the Menstrual Cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 112, 77– 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.04.007
Derntl, B., Pintzinger, N., Kryspin-Exner, I., & Schöpf, V. (2014). The Impact of Sex Hormone Concentrations on Decision-Making in Females and Males. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8 (OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00352
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1982, February 19). Ley 23. Sobre derechos de autor. Diario Oficial 35.499. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.phpi=3431#::text=Esta%20Ley%20protege%20exclusivamente%20la,obras%20literarias%2C%20cient%C3%ADficas%20y%20art%C3%ADsticas
Colegio Colombiano de Psicólogos. (2009). Deontología y Bioética del ejercicio de la Psicología en Colombia. Colegio Colombiano de Psicólogos.
Catena, T. M., Simmons, Z. L., & Roney, J. R. (2019). Do Women’s Faces Become more Attractive near Ovulation? Hormones and Behavior, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.07.008
Alzate-Pamplona, F.-A. (2020). Decisiones económicas en los cambios hormonales de la mujer. Editorial Bonaventuriana. https://doi.org/10.21500/EB.9789588474915
Chen, Y., Katuˇaˇcák, P., & Ozdenoren, E. (2013). Why can’t a woman bid more like a man? Games and Economic Behavior, 77 (1), 181–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.002
American Psychological Association–APA. (2003). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. APA.
Asociación Médica Mundial. (2013). Declaración de Helsinki. Principios éticos para las investigaciones con seres humanos. Asociación Médica Mundial. https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/
Barel, E., Shahrabani, S., & Tzischinsky, O. (2017). Sex Hormone/Cortisol Ratios Differentially Modulate Risk-Taking in Men and Women. Evolutionary Psychology, 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917697333
Beall, A. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2013). Women Are More Likely to Wear Red or Pink at Peak Fertility. Psychological Science, 24 (9), 1837–1841. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613476045
Buffet, N. C., Djakoure, C., Maitre, S. C., & Bouchard, P. (1998). Regulation of the Human Menstrual Cycle. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 19 (3), 151–186. https://doi.org/10.1006/frne.1998.0167
Buser, T. (2012). Digit ratios, the Menstrual Cycle and Social Preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 76 (2), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.07.006
Casto, K. V., & Prasad, S. (2017). Recommendations for the study of women in hormones and competition research. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.05.009
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408
Allen, A. M., McRae-Clark, A. L., Carlson, S., Saladin, M. E., Gray, K. M., Wetherington, C. L., McKee, S. A., & Allen, S. S. (2016). Determining Menstrual Phase in Human Biobehavioral Research. A Review with Recommendations. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 24 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000057
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2023-04-24
date_accessioned 2023-04-24T19:34:48Z
date_available 2023-04-24T19:34:48Z
url https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/5919
url_doi https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5919
issn 2011-2084
eissn 2011-7922
doi 10.21500/20112084.5919
citationstartpage 6
citationendpage 16
url2_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5919/5051
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5919/5036
url3_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5919/5067
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5919/5066
url4_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5919/5055
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5919/5054
_version_ 1833524896612745216

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares