Procesos inhibitorios e inteligencia fluida: su desempeño en los primeros años de escolaridad

Aydmune, Yesica; Introzzi, Isabel; Zamora, Eliana Vanesa; Stelzer, Florencia

doi:10.21500/20112084.4231

Titulo:

Procesos inhibitorios e inteligencia fluida: su desempeño en los primeros años de escolaridad
.

Sumario:

La inhibición constituye una de las principales funciones ejecutivas, siendo fundamental para otras habilidades más complejas, tales como la inteligencia fluida. Actualmente, existe acuerdo en distinguir tres procesos inhibitorios: inhibición perceptual, cognitiva y de la respuesta. Distintos estudios muestran que los tipos inhibitorios participan de manera diferencial en diversas habilidades, aunque no se registra evidencia sobre la relación diferencial de los mismos con la inteligencia fluida. Su estudio es especialmente importante durante los primeros años de la escuela primaria, donde los procesos inhibitorios estarían diferenciados y tanto ellos como la inteligencia fluida se vinculan con el desempeño de los niños en el ámbito escolar.... Ver más

Guardado en:

Revista:

International Journal of Psychological Research

ISSN:

2011-2084

EISSN:

2011-7922

Autores:

Aydmune, Yesica

Introzzi, Isabel

Zamora, Eliana Vanesa

Stelzer, Florencia

Editor:

UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA

DOI:

10.21500/20112084.4231

Volumen:

Año de publicación:

2020-01-20

Pagina inicial:

Pagina final:

Pais:

Colombia

Palabras claves:

Inhibición perceptual

niñez

inteligencia fluida

inhibición de la respuesta

inhibición cognitiva

Licencia:

International Journal of Psychological Research - 2020

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id	metarevistapublica_unisanbuenaventura_internationaljournalofpsychologicalresearch_21-article-4231
record_format	ojs
institution	UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA
thumbnail	https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str	Colombia
collection	International Journal of Psychological Research
title	Procesos inhibitorios e inteligencia fluida: su desempeño en los primeros años de escolaridad
spellingShingle	Procesos inhibitorios e inteligencia fluida: su desempeño en los primeros años de escolaridad Aydmune, Yesica Introzzi, Isabel Zamora, Eliana Vanesa Stelzer, Florencia Inhibición perceptual niñez inteligencia fluida inhibición de la respuesta inhibición cognitiva childhood fluid intelligence Perceptual inhibition cognitive inhibition response inhibition
title_short	Procesos inhibitorios e inteligencia fluida: su desempeño en los primeros años de escolaridad
title_full	Procesos inhibitorios e inteligencia fluida: su desempeño en los primeros años de escolaridad
title_fullStr	Procesos inhibitorios e inteligencia fluida: su desempeño en los primeros años de escolaridad
title_full_unstemmed	Procesos inhibitorios e inteligencia fluida: su desempeño en los primeros años de escolaridad
title_sort	procesos inhibitorios e inteligencia fluida: su desempeño en los primeros años de escolaridad
description	La inhibición constituye una de las principales funciones ejecutivas, siendo fundamental para otras habilidades más complejas, tales como la inteligencia fluida. Actualmente, existe acuerdo en distinguir tres procesos inhibitorios: inhibición perceptual, cognitiva y de la respuesta. Distintos estudios muestran que los tipos inhibitorios participan de manera diferencial en diversas habilidades, aunque no se registra evidencia sobre la relación diferencial de los mismos con la inteligencia fluida. Su estudio es especialmente importante durante los primeros años de la escuela primaria, donde los procesos inhibitorios estarían diferenciados y tanto ellos como la inteligencia fluida se vinculan con el desempeño de los niños en el ámbito escolar. Por estos motivos, este trabajo se propuso analizar la relación y contribución de la inhibición perceptual, cognitiva y de la respuesta con la inteligencia fluida en niños en los primeros años de la escuela primaria. Para ello, una muestra de niños de seis a ocho años de edad (N = 178) fue evaluada con una tarea de inhibición perceptual (test de percepción de diferencias y similitudes), una tarea de inhibición cognitiva (tarea de interferencia proactiva), una tarea de inhibición de la respuesta (basada en el paradigma stop signal) y una tarea de inteligencia fluida (test de matrices progresivas). Se encontraron correlaciones significativas entre la inhibición perceptual y de la respuesta con la inteligencia fluida (controlando la edad), pero solo la inhibición perceptual explica de manera significativa parte del rendimiento en la tarea de inteligencia fluida. Este estudio aporta datos específicos sobre la contribución de un tipo inhibitorio a la inteligencia fluida durante la niñez, así como evidencia empírica a favor del modelo no-unitario de la inhibición.&nbsp;
description_eng	Inhibition constitutes one of the main executive functions and it is important to more complex skills such as fluid intelligence. Actually, there is an agreement on distinguishing three inhibitory types: perceptual, cognitive and response inhibition. Several studies show the differential engagement of these inhibitory types in different skills. However, there is no registered evidence about the differential relation of inhibitory types with fluid intelligence. This inquiry is especially important during the first school years, since in this stage, inhibitory processes would already be differentiated, and inhibitory processes and fluid intelligence are linked to the performance of children in the school setting. For these reasons, the goal of this work is to study the relation and contribution of perceptual, cognitive, and response inhibition with fluid intelligence, in children in the first years of primary school. For that purpose, a sample of children from six to eight years old (N = 178) was tested with a perceptual inhibition task (perception of similarities and differences task); a cognitive inhibition task (proactive interference task); a response inhibition task (stop signal task); and a fluid intelligence task (progressive matrices task). We observed significant correlations between perceptual and response inhibition and fluid intelligence (controlling for age), but only perceptual inhibition explains significantly part of the performance in the fluid intelligence task. This study provides data about the specific contribution, during childhood, of an inhibitory type to fluid intelligence and contributes empirical evidence in support of the non-unitary approach of inhibition.
author	Aydmune, Yesica Introzzi, Isabel Zamora, Eliana Vanesa Stelzer, Florencia
author_facet	Aydmune, Yesica Introzzi, Isabel Zamora, Eliana Vanesa Stelzer, Florencia
topicspa_str_mv	Inhibición perceptual niñez inteligencia fluida inhibición de la respuesta inhibición cognitiva
topic	Inhibición perceptual niñez inteligencia fluida inhibición de la respuesta inhibición cognitiva childhood fluid intelligence Perceptual inhibition cognitive inhibition response inhibition
topic_facet	Inhibición perceptual niñez inteligencia fluida inhibición de la respuesta inhibición cognitiva childhood fluid intelligence Perceptual inhibition cognitive inhibition response inhibition
citationvolume	13
citationissue	1
publisher	Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
ispartofjournal	International Journal of Psychological Research
source	https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/4231
language	Inglés
format	Article
rights	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ International Journal of Psychological Research - 2020 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references_eng	Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106 (1), 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003. Arán Filippetti, V., Krumm, G., & Raimondi, W. (2010). Funciones Ejecutivas y sus correlatos con Inteligencia Cristalizada y Fluida: Un estudio en Niños y Adolescentes. Revista Neuropsicología Latinoamericana, 7 (2), 24–33. Retrieved from: http://www.redalyc.org/html/4395/439542510003. Aslan, A., Staudigl, T., Samenieh, A., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2010). Directed forgetting in young children: Evidence for a production deficiency. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17 (6), 784–789. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.6.784. Aydmune, Y., Introzzi, I., & Lipina, S. (2019). Inhibitory Processes Training for School-age Children: Transfer Effects. Developmental Neuropsychology, 44 (7), 513–542. doi:10.1080/87565641.2019.1677667. Aydmune, Y., Lipina, S., & Introzzi, I. (2017). Definiciones y métodos de entrenamiento de la inhibición en la niñez, desde una perspectiva neuropsicológica. Una revisión sistemática. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento (RACC), 3 (9), 104–141. Retrieved from: http://www.revistas.unc.edu.ar. Aydmune, Y. S., Introzzi, I. M., Zamora, E. V., & Lipina, S. J. (2016). Developmental science and executive function. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25 (1), 3–7. doi:10.1177/0963721415622634. Aydmune, Y. S., Introzzi, I. M., Zamora, E. V., & Lipina, S. J. (2018). Diseño, implementación y análisis de transferencia de una tarea de entrenamiento de inhibición cognitiva para niños escolares. Un estudio piloto. Psicología Educativa, 24 , 63–74. doi:10.5093/psed2018a11. Bezdjian, S., Tuvblad, C., Wang, P., Raine, A., & Baker, L. A. (2014). Motor impulsivity during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal biometric analysis of the go/no-go task in 9-to 18-year-old twins. Developmental Psychology, 50 (11), 2549–2557. doi:10.1037/a0038037. Blair, C., & Razza, R. (2007). Relating Effortful Control, Executive Function, and False Belief Understanding to Emerging Math and Literacy Ability in Kindergarten. Child Development, 78 (2), 647–663. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x. Borella, E., Carretti, B., & Lanfranchi, S. (2013). Inhibitory mechanisms in down syndrome: Is there a specific or general deficit? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34 (1), 65–71. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.017. Borella, E., Carretti, B., & Mammarella, I. (2006). Do working memory and susceptibility to interference predict individual differences in fluid intelligence? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18 (1), 51–69. doi:10.1080/09541440500215962. Borella, E., Carretti, B., & Pelegrina, S. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning disabilities, 43 (6), 541–552. doi:10.1177/0022219410371676. Borella, E., & De Ribaupierre, A. (2014). The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed in text comprehension in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 34 , 86–92. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.0011041-6080 Brown, J. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10 , 12–21. doi:10.1080/17470215808416249. Burgess, G. C., Gray, J. R., Conway, A. R., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140 (4), 674–692. doi:10.1037/a0024695. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1995). Diseños experimentales y cuasi-experimentales en la investigación social (M. Kitaigorodzki, trad. 1st edition in Spanish 1973; 7th reprint). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu (original work published in 1966). Canet Juric, L., Andrés, M. L., Demagistri, S., Mascarello, G., & Burin, D. (2015). Rol de las funciones inhibitorias en la memoria de trabajo: evidencia en niños y adolescentes. Pensamiento Psicológico, 13 (2), 109–121. doi:10.11144/javerianacali.ppsi13-2.rfim. Carlson, S. M. (2005). Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28 (2), 595–616. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2802_3. Cattell, R. B., & Horn, J. L. (1978). A check on the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence with description of new subtest designs. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15 (3), 139–164. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1978.tb00065.x. Cayssials, A., Albajari, V., Aldrey, A., Fernández Liporace, M., Naisberg, C., & Scheinsohn, M. J. (1993). Carpeta de Evaluación Escala Coloreada. Adaptación argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidos. Christ, S. E., Kester, L. E., Bodner, K. E., & Miles, J. H. (2011). Evidence for selective inhibitory impairment in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychology, 25 (6), 690–701. doi:10.1037/a0024256. Conway, A. R. A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A., & Towse, J. N. E. (2007). Variation in working memory. An introduction. In Variation in working memory (pp. 3–20). New York, USA: Oxford university press. Cozzani, F., Usai, M. C., & Zanobini, M. (2013). Linguistic abilities and executive function in the third year of life. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata/Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics, 13 (1), 25–43. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maria_-Carmen_Usai/publication/ 258891523_LINGUISTIC_ABILITIES_AND_EXECUTIVE_FUNCTION_IN_THE_THIRD_YEAR_OF_LIFE/links/00b7d5295cedb4cbb4000000.pdf. Cragg, L., & Nation, K. (2008). Go or no go? developmental improvements in the efficiency of response inhibition in mid-childhood. Developmental Science, 11 (6), 819–827. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00730.x. Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65 (2), 171–237. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.2356. Darowski, E. S., Helder, E., Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2008). Age-related differences in cognition: The role of distraction control. Neuropsychologia, 22 (5), 638–644. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.22.5.638. Davidson, M., Amso, D., Anderson, L., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44 (11), 20–37. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006. Demagistri, M. S., Canet, L., Naveira, L., & Richard’s, M. (2012). Memoria de trabajo, mecanismos inhibitorios y rendimiento lecto-comprensivo en grupos de comprendedores de secundaria básica. Revista Chilena de Neuropsicología, 7 (2), 72–78. doi:10.5839/rcnp.2012.0702.06. Dempster, F. N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12 (1), 45–75. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(92)90003-K. Dempster, F. N. (1993). Resistance to interference: Developmental changes in a basic processing dimension. En M. L. Howe & R. Pasnak (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development. Vol. 1: Foundations (pp. 3–27). New York: Springer-Verlag. Dempster, F. N., & Corkhill, A. J. (1999). Interference and inhibition in cognition and behaviour: Unifying themes for educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 11 , 1–88. doi:10.1023/A:1021992632168. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64 (1), 135–168. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. Diamond, A. (2016). Why improving and assessing executive functions early in life is critical. In Griffin, J., McCardle, P. and Freund, L. (ed) Executive Functions in Pre-school Age-Children. Integrating Measurement, Neurodevelopment and Translational Research, (pp 11-44). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Duan, X., Wei, S., Wang, G., & Shi, J. (2010). The relationship between executive functions and intelligence on 11-to 12-year-old children. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54 (4), 419–431. Retrieved from: https://www.psychologieaktuell.com/journale/psychological-test-andassessment-modeling.html. Espy, K. A., McDiarmid, M., Cwik, M., Senn, T., Hamby, A., & Stalets, M. (2004). The contribution of executive functions to emergent mathematic skills in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26 (1), 456–465. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2601_6. Ferrer, E., O’Hare, E. D., & Bunge, S. A. (2009). Fluid reasoning and the developing brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3 (1), 46. doi:10.3389/neuro.01.003.2009. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133 (1), 101–135. doi:10.1177/0963721411429458. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186–204. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023. Gandolfi, E., Viterbori, P., Traverso, L., & Usai, M. C. (2014). Inhibitory processes in toddlers: a latentvariable approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 , 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00381. Gardner, R. C. (2003). Estadística para Psicología usando SPSS para Windows. México: Pearson Educación. Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134 (1), 31–60. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31. Goikoetxea, E. (2000). Frecuencia de producción de las respuestas a 52 categorías verbales en niños de primaria. Psicológica, 21 , 61–89. Retrieved from: http://uag.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=16921104. Harnishfeger, K. K., & Pope, R. S. (1996). Intending to forget: The development of cognitive inhibition in directed forgetting. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63 , 292–315. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.0032. Hasher, L., Lustig, C., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. In A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake, A. & J. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory, (pp. 227-249). New York: Oxford University Press. Hernández, S. R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2015). Metodología de la Investigación. (6th ed.). México: McGraw Hill. Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16 (3), 174–180. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006. Howard, S. J., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2014). Clarifying inhibitory control: Diversity and development of attentional inhibition. Cognitive Development, 31 (1), 1–21. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.03.001. Huizinga, M., Dolan, C. V., & van der Molen, M. W. (2006). Age-related change in executive function: Developmental trends and a latent variable analysis. Neuropsychologia, 44 (11), 2017–2036. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.010. Introzzi, I., & Canet Juric, L. (2012). TAC: Tareas de Autorregulación Cognitiva (Application for deposit in custody of unpublished work in the National Copyright Office. File No. 5068904). Introzzi, I., Richard’s, M., García Coni, A., Aydmune, Y., Comesaña, A., Canet Juric, L., & Galli, J. (2016). El desarrollo de la inhibición perceptual en niños y adolescentes a través del paradigma de búsqueda visual conjunta. Revista Argentina de Neuropsicología, 29 , 1–15. Retrieved from: http://www.revneuropsi.com.ar. Introzzi, I. M., Canet Juric, L., Aydmune, Y., & Stelzer, F. (2016). Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence on Inhibition. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 25 (2), 351–368. doi:10.15446/rcp.v25n2.52011. Ison, M. S., & Carrada, M. (2012). Tipificación argentina del Test de Percepción de Diferencias (CARAS). In L.L. Thurstone & M. Yela. Test de Percepción de Diferencias Revisado (CARAS-R, pp. 37-63). Madrid: Tea. Kail, R. (2002). Developmental change in proactive interference. Child Development, 73 , 1703–1714. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00500. Liu, Q., Zhu, X., Ziegler, A., & Shi, J. (2015). The effects of inhibitory control training for preschoolers on reasoning ability and neural activity. Scientific Reports, 5 (1), 1–10. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00500. Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. (1997). Psychological science. Scientific Reports, 8 (1), 60–64. doi:10.1111/j.14679280.1997.tb00545.x. MacLeod, C. (2007). The concept of inhibition in cognitivion. In D. Gorfein & C. MacLeod (eds). Inhibition in Cognition (pp. 3-24). Washington: APA. MacLeod, C. M., Dodd, M. D., Sheard, E. D., Wilson, D. E., & Bibi, U. (2003). In opposition to inhibition. In B. H. Ross (Ed.). The psychology of learning and Motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 163–214). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Mann, T., De Ridder, D., & Fujita, K. (2013). Self-regulation of health behavior: social psychological approaches to goal setting and goal striving. Health Psychology, 32 (5), 487–498. doi:10.1037/a0028533. McArdle, J. J., Ferrer-Caja, E., Hamagami, F., & Woodcock, R. W. (2002). Comparative longitudinal structural analyses of the growth and decline of multiple intellectual abilities over the life span. Developmental Psychology, 38 (1), 115–142. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.1.115. McCall, R. B. (1994). What process mediates predictions of childhood IQ from infant habituation and recognition memory? Speculations on the roles of inhibition and rate of information processing. Intelligence, 18 (2), 107–125. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(94)90022-1. McCall, R. B., & Carriger, M. S. (1993). A metaanalysis of infant habituation and recognition memory performance as predictors of later IQ. Child Development, 64 (1), 57–79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02895.x. McCoy, D. C. (2019). Measuring Young Children’s Executive Function and Self-Regulation in Classrooms and Other Real-World Settings. Clinical child and family psychology review, 22 (1), 63–74. doi:10.1007/s10567-019-00285-1. McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37 , 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004. Michel, F., & Anderson, M. (2009). Using the antisaccade task to investigate the relationship between the development of inhibition and the development of intelligence. Developmental Science, 12 , 272–288. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00759.x. Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Shortterm retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58 , 193–198. doi:10.1037/h0049234. Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2010). Suppressing irrelevant information from working memory: Evidence for domain-specific deficits in poor comprehenders. Journal of Memory and Language, 62 (4), 380–391. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.005. Pértegas Díaz, S., & Pita Fernández, S. (2002). Determinación del tamaño muestral para calcular la significación del coeficiente de correlación lineal. Cuadernos de Atención Primaria, 9 , 209–211. Raven, J., Court, J., & Raven, J. (1993). Test de Matrices Progresivas. Escalas Coloreada, General y Avanzada. Manual. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidos. Richard’s, M. M., Introzzi, I., Zamora, E., Vernucci, S., Stelzer, F., & Andrés, M. L. (2017). Evidencias de validez convergente del paradigma Stop-Signal para la medición de la inhibición comportamental en niños. Revista Argentina de Neuropsicología, 30 , 50–65. Retrieved from: http://www.revneuropsi.com.ar/. Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2017). Working memory training in typically developing children: A meta-analysis of the available evidence. Developmental Psychology, 53 (4), 671–685. doi:10.1037/dev0000265. Schachar, R., & Logan, G. D. (1990). Impulsivity and inhibitory control in normal development and childhood psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 26 (5), 710–720. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.26.5.710. Schachar, R., Tannock, R., Marriott, M., & Logan, G. (1995). Deficient inhibitory control in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23 (4), 411–437. doi:10.1007/bf01447206. Sheese, B., & Lipina, S. (2011). Funciones ejecutivas: consideraciones sobre su evaluación y el diseño de intervenciones orientadas a optimizarlas. En S. Lipina y M. Sigman (Eds.). La pizarra de Babel. Puentes entre neurociencia, psicología y educación (pp. 229-242). Buenos Aires: Libros del Zorzal. Stelzer, F. (2014). Inteligencia, funciones ejecutivas y temperamento. sus relaciones al inicio de la escolaridad básica (tesis doctoral). Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Retrieved from: http://www.mdp.edu.ar/psicologia/psico/doctorado/tesis/stelzer.pdf. Stelzer, F., Andés, M. L., Canet-Juric, L., & Introzzi, I. (2016). Memoria de Trabajo e Inteligencia Fluida. Una Revisión de sus Relaciones. Acta de Investigación Psicológica-Psychological Research Records, 6 (1), 2302–2316. doi:10.1016/s2007-4719(16)30051-5. Thurstone, L. L., & Yela, M. (2012). Test de percepción de diferencias (caras-r). Madrid: Tea. Tiego, J., Testa, R., Bellgrove, M. A., Pantelis, C., & Whittle, S. (2018). A hierarchical model of inhibitory control. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 , 1339. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339. Traverso, L., Fontana, M., Usai, M. C., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2018). Response inhibition and interference suppression in individuals with down syndrome compared to typically developing children. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 . doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00660. Van Gerven, P. W. M., Hurks, P. P. M., Bovend’Eerdt, T. J. H., & Adam, J. J. (2016). Switch hands! mapping proactive and reactive cognitive control across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 52 (6), 960–971. doi:10.1037/dev0000116. Vara, A. S., Pang, E. W., Vidal, J., Anagnostou, E., & Taylor, M. J. (2014). Neural mechanisms of inhibitory control continue to mature in adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 , 129–139. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2014.08.009. Verbruggen, F., Chambers, C. D., & Logan, G. D. (2013). Fictitious inhibitory differences: How skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies. Psychological Science, 24 (3), 352–362. doi:10.1177/0956797612457390. Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33 (5), 647–661. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014. Volckaert, A. M. S., & Noël, M. P. (2015). Training executive function in preschoolers reduce externalizing behaviors. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4 (1), 37–47. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2015.02.001. Volckaert, A. M. S., & Noël, M. P. (2016). Externalizing behavior problems in preschoolers: Impact of an inhibition training. Journal of Psychological Abnormalities, 5 , 154. doi:10.4172/2471-9900.1000154. Zellner, M., & Baüml, K. (2004). Retrieval inhibition in episodic recall. In A. Mecklinger, H. Zimmer, & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Bound in memory: Insights from behavioral and neuropsychological studies (pp.1–26). Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag. Zhao, X., Chen, L., & Maes, J. H. (2016). Training and transfer effects of response inhibition training in children and adults. Developmental Science, 20 (6), 1–12. doi:10.1111/desc.12511. Zhao, X., & Jia, L. (2018). Training and transfer effects of interference control training in children and young adults. Psychological Research, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1007-6.
type_driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content	Text
publishDate	2020-01-20
date_accessioned	2020-01-20T22:24:32Z
date_available	2020-01-20T22:24:32Z
url	https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/4231
url_doi	https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4231
issn	2011-2084
eissn	2011-7922
doi	10.21500/20112084.4231
citationstartpage	29
citationendpage	39
url4_str_mv	https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4231/3657
url2_str_mv	https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4231/3544
_version_	1823199589546590208
spelling	Procesos inhibitorios e inteligencia fluida: su desempeño en los primeros años de escolaridad Inhibición perceptual La inhibición constituye una de las principales funciones ejecutivas, siendo fundamental para otras habilidades más complejas, tales como la inteligencia fluida. Actualmente, existe acuerdo en distinguir tres procesos inhibitorios: inhibición perceptual, cognitiva y de la respuesta. Distintos estudios muestran que los tipos inhibitorios participan de manera diferencial en diversas habilidades, aunque no se registra evidencia sobre la relación diferencial de los mismos con la inteligencia fluida. Su estudio es especialmente importante durante los primeros años de la escuela primaria, donde los procesos inhibitorios estarían diferenciados y tanto ellos como la inteligencia fluida se vinculan con el desempeño de los niños en el ámbito escolar. Por estos motivos, este trabajo se propuso analizar la relación y contribución de la inhibición perceptual, cognitiva y de la respuesta con la inteligencia fluida en niños en los primeros años de la escuela primaria. Para ello, una muestra de niños de seis a ocho años de edad (N = 178) fue evaluada con una tarea de inhibición perceptual (test de percepción de diferencias y similitudes), una tarea de inhibición cognitiva (tarea de interferencia proactiva), una tarea de inhibición de la respuesta (basada en el paradigma stop signal) y una tarea de inteligencia fluida (test de matrices progresivas). Se encontraron correlaciones significativas entre la inhibición perceptual y de la respuesta con la inteligencia fluida (controlando la edad), pero solo la inhibición perceptual explica de manera significativa parte del rendimiento en la tarea de inteligencia fluida. Este estudio aporta datos específicos sobre la contribución de un tipo inhibitorio a la inteligencia fluida durante la niñez, así como evidencia empírica a favor del modelo no-unitario de la inhibición.&nbsp; Artículo de revista niñez inteligencia fluida inhibición de la respuesta inhibición cognitiva Procesos inhibitorios e inteligencia fluida: su desempeño en los primeros años de escolaridad Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia) International Journal of Psychological Research https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/4231 Inglés https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ International Journal of Psychological Research - 2020 Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106 (1), 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003. Arán Filippetti, V., Krumm, G., & Raimondi, W. (2010). Funciones Ejecutivas y sus correlatos con Inteligencia Cristalizada y Fluida: Un estudio en Niños y Adolescentes. Revista Neuropsicología Latinoamericana, 7 (2), 24–33. Retrieved from: http://www.redalyc.org/html/4395/439542510003. Aslan, A., Staudigl, T., Samenieh, A., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2010). Directed forgetting in young children: Evidence for a production deficiency. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17 (6), 784–789. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.6.784. Aydmune, Y., Introzzi, I., & Lipina, S. (2019). Inhibitory Processes Training for School-age Children: Transfer Effects. Developmental Neuropsychology, 44 (7), 513–542. doi:10.1080/87565641.2019.1677667. Aydmune, Y., Lipina, S., & Introzzi, I. (2017). Definiciones y métodos de entrenamiento de la inhibición en la niñez, desde una perspectiva neuropsicológica. Una revisión sistemática. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento (RACC), 3 (9), 104–141. Retrieved from: http://www.revistas.unc.edu.ar. Aydmune, Y. S., Introzzi, I. M., Zamora, E. V., & Lipina, S. J. (2016). Developmental science and executive function. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25 (1), 3–7. doi:10.1177/0963721415622634. Aydmune, Y. S., Introzzi, I. M., Zamora, E. V., & Lipina, S. J. (2018). Diseño, implementación y análisis de transferencia de una tarea de entrenamiento de inhibición cognitiva para niños escolares. Un estudio piloto. Psicología Educativa, 24 , 63–74. doi:10.5093/psed2018a11. Bezdjian, S., Tuvblad, C., Wang, P., Raine, A., & Baker, L. A. (2014). Motor impulsivity during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal biometric analysis of the go/no-go task in 9-to 18-year-old twins. Developmental Psychology, 50 (11), 2549–2557. doi:10.1037/a0038037. Blair, C., & Razza, R. (2007). Relating Effortful Control, Executive Function, and False Belief Understanding to Emerging Math and Literacy Ability in Kindergarten. Child Development, 78 (2), 647–663. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x. Borella, E., Carretti, B., & Lanfranchi, S. (2013). Inhibitory mechanisms in down syndrome: Is there a specific or general deficit? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34 (1), 65–71. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.017. Borella, E., Carretti, B., & Mammarella, I. (2006). Do working memory and susceptibility to interference predict individual differences in fluid intelligence? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18 (1), 51–69. doi:10.1080/09541440500215962. Borella, E., Carretti, B., & Pelegrina, S. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning disabilities, 43 (6), 541–552. doi:10.1177/0022219410371676. Borella, E., & De Ribaupierre, A. (2014). The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed in text comprehension in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 34 , 86–92. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.0011041-6080 Brown, J. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10 , 12–21. doi:10.1080/17470215808416249. Burgess, G. C., Gray, J. R., Conway, A. R., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140 (4), 674–692. doi:10.1037/a0024695. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1995). Diseños experimentales y cuasi-experimentales en la investigación social (M. Kitaigorodzki, trad. 1st edition in Spanish 1973; 7th reprint). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu (original work published in 1966). Canet Juric, L., Andrés, M. L., Demagistri, S., Mascarello, G., & Burin, D. (2015). Rol de las funciones inhibitorias en la memoria de trabajo: evidencia en niños y adolescentes. Pensamiento Psicológico, 13 (2), 109–121. doi:10.11144/javerianacali.ppsi13-2.rfim. Carlson, S. M. (2005). Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28 (2), 595–616. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2802_3. Cattell, R. B., & Horn, J. L. (1978). A check on the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence with description of new subtest designs. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15 (3), 139–164. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1978.tb00065.x. Cayssials, A., Albajari, V., Aldrey, A., Fernández Liporace, M., Naisberg, C., & Scheinsohn, M. J. (1993). Carpeta de Evaluación Escala Coloreada. Adaptación argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidos. Christ, S. E., Kester, L. E., Bodner, K. E., & Miles, J. H. (2011). Evidence for selective inhibitory impairment in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychology, 25 (6), 690–701. doi:10.1037/a0024256. Conway, A. R. A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A., & Towse, J. N. E. (2007). Variation in working memory. An introduction. In Variation in working memory (pp. 3–20). New York, USA: Oxford university press. Cozzani, F., Usai, M. C., & Zanobini, M. (2013). Linguistic abilities and executive function in the third year of life. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata/Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics, 13 (1), 25–43. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maria_-Carmen_Usai/publication/ 258891523_LINGUISTIC_ABILITIES_AND_EXECUTIVE_FUNCTION_IN_THE_THIRD_YEAR_OF_LIFE/links/00b7d5295cedb4cbb4000000.pdf. Cragg, L., & Nation, K. (2008). Go or no go? developmental improvements in the efficiency of response inhibition in mid-childhood. Developmental Science, 11 (6), 819–827. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00730.x. Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65 (2), 171–237. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.2356. Darowski, E. S., Helder, E., Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2008). Age-related differences in cognition: The role of distraction control. Neuropsychologia, 22 (5), 638–644. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.22.5.638. Davidson, M., Amso, D., Anderson, L., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44 (11), 20–37. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006. Demagistri, M. S., Canet, L., Naveira, L., & Richard’s, M. (2012). Memoria de trabajo, mecanismos inhibitorios y rendimiento lecto-comprensivo en grupos de comprendedores de secundaria básica. Revista Chilena de Neuropsicología, 7 (2), 72–78. doi:10.5839/rcnp.2012.0702.06. Dempster, F. N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12 (1), 45–75. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(92)90003-K. Dempster, F. N. (1993). Resistance to interference: Developmental changes in a basic processing dimension. En M. L. Howe & R. Pasnak (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development. Vol. 1: Foundations (pp. 3–27). New York: Springer-Verlag. Dempster, F. N., & Corkhill, A. J. (1999). Interference and inhibition in cognition and behaviour: Unifying themes for educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 11 , 1–88. doi:10.1023/A:1021992632168. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64 (1), 135–168. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. Diamond, A. (2016). Why improving and assessing executive functions early in life is critical. In Griffin, J., McCardle, P. and Freund, L. (ed) Executive Functions in Pre-school Age-Children. Integrating Measurement, Neurodevelopment and Translational Research, (pp 11-44). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Duan, X., Wei, S., Wang, G., & Shi, J. (2010). The relationship between executive functions and intelligence on 11-to 12-year-old children. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54 (4), 419–431. Retrieved from: https://www.psychologieaktuell.com/journale/psychological-test-andassessment-modeling.html. Espy, K. A., McDiarmid, M., Cwik, M., Senn, T., Hamby, A., & Stalets, M. (2004). The contribution of executive functions to emergent mathematic skills in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26 (1), 456–465. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2601_6. Ferrer, E., O’Hare, E. D., & Bunge, S. A. (2009). Fluid reasoning and the developing brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3 (1), 46. doi:10.3389/neuro.01.003.2009. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133 (1), 101–135. doi:10.1177/0963721411429458. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186–204. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023. Gandolfi, E., Viterbori, P., Traverso, L., & Usai, M. C. (2014). Inhibitory processes in toddlers: a latentvariable approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 , 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00381. Gardner, R. C. (2003). Estadística para Psicología usando SPSS para Windows. México: Pearson Educación. Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134 (1), 31–60. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31. Goikoetxea, E. (2000). Frecuencia de producción de las respuestas a 52 categorías verbales en niños de primaria. Psicológica, 21 , 61–89. Retrieved from: http://uag.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=16921104. Harnishfeger, K. K., & Pope, R. S. (1996). Intending to forget: The development of cognitive inhibition in directed forgetting. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63 , 292–315. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.0032. Hasher, L., Lustig, C., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. In A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake, A. & J. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory, (pp. 227-249). New York: Oxford University Press. Hernández, S. R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2015). Metodología de la Investigación. (6th ed.). México: McGraw Hill. Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16 (3), 174–180. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006. Howard, S. J., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2014). Clarifying inhibitory control: Diversity and development of attentional inhibition. Cognitive Development, 31 (1), 1–21. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.03.001. Huizinga, M., Dolan, C. V., & van der Molen, M. W. (2006). Age-related change in executive function: Developmental trends and a latent variable analysis. Neuropsychologia, 44 (11), 2017–2036. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.010. Introzzi, I., & Canet Juric, L. (2012). TAC: Tareas de Autorregulación Cognitiva (Application for deposit in custody of unpublished work in the National Copyright Office. File No. 5068904). Introzzi, I., Richard’s, M., García Coni, A., Aydmune, Y., Comesaña, A., Canet Juric, L., & Galli, J. (2016). El desarrollo de la inhibición perceptual en niños y adolescentes a través del paradigma de búsqueda visual conjunta. Revista Argentina de Neuropsicología, 29 , 1–15. Retrieved from: http://www.revneuropsi.com.ar. Introzzi, I. M., Canet Juric, L., Aydmune, Y., & Stelzer, F. (2016). Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence on Inhibition. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 25 (2), 351–368. doi:10.15446/rcp.v25n2.52011. Ison, M. S., & Carrada, M. (2012). Tipificación argentina del Test de Percepción de Diferencias (CARAS). In L.L. Thurstone & M. Yela. Test de Percepción de Diferencias Revisado (CARAS-R, pp. 37-63). Madrid: Tea. Kail, R. (2002). Developmental change in proactive interference. Child Development, 73 , 1703–1714. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00500. Liu, Q., Zhu, X., Ziegler, A., & Shi, J. (2015). The effects of inhibitory control training for preschoolers on reasoning ability and neural activity. Scientific Reports, 5 (1), 1–10. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00500. Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. (1997). Psychological science. Scientific Reports, 8 (1), 60–64. doi:10.1111/j.14679280.1997.tb00545.x. MacLeod, C. (2007). The concept of inhibition in cognitivion. In D. Gorfein & C. MacLeod (eds). Inhibition in Cognition (pp. 3-24). Washington: APA. MacLeod, C. M., Dodd, M. D., Sheard, E. D., Wilson, D. E., & Bibi, U. (2003). In opposition to inhibition. In B. H. Ross (Ed.). The psychology of learning and Motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 163–214). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Mann, T., De Ridder, D., & Fujita, K. (2013). Self-regulation of health behavior: social psychological approaches to goal setting and goal striving. Health Psychology, 32 (5), 487–498. doi:10.1037/a0028533. McArdle, J. J., Ferrer-Caja, E., Hamagami, F., & Woodcock, R. W. (2002). Comparative longitudinal structural analyses of the growth and decline of multiple intellectual abilities over the life span. Developmental Psychology, 38 (1), 115–142. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.1.115. McCall, R. B. (1994). What process mediates predictions of childhood IQ from infant habituation and recognition memory? Speculations on the roles of inhibition and rate of information processing. Intelligence, 18 (2), 107–125. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(94)90022-1. McCall, R. B., & Carriger, M. S. (1993). A metaanalysis of infant habituation and recognition memory performance as predictors of later IQ. Child Development, 64 (1), 57–79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02895.x. McCoy, D. C. (2019). Measuring Young Children’s Executive Function and Self-Regulation in Classrooms and Other Real-World Settings. Clinical child and family psychology review, 22 (1), 63–74. doi:10.1007/s10567-019-00285-1. McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37 , 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004. Michel, F., & Anderson, M. (2009). Using the antisaccade task to investigate the relationship between the development of inhibition and the development of intelligence. Developmental Science, 12 , 272–288. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00759.x. Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Shortterm retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58 , 193–198. doi:10.1037/h0049234. Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2010). Suppressing irrelevant information from working memory: Evidence for domain-specific deficits in poor comprehenders. Journal of Memory and Language, 62 (4), 380–391. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.005. Pértegas Díaz, S., & Pita Fernández, S. (2002). Determinación del tamaño muestral para calcular la significación del coeficiente de correlación lineal. Cuadernos de Atención Primaria, 9 , 209–211. Raven, J., Court, J., & Raven, J. (1993). Test de Matrices Progresivas. Escalas Coloreada, General y Avanzada. Manual. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidos. Richard’s, M. M., Introzzi, I., Zamora, E., Vernucci, S., Stelzer, F., & Andrés, M. L. (2017). Evidencias de validez convergente del paradigma Stop-Signal para la medición de la inhibición comportamental en niños. Revista Argentina de Neuropsicología, 30 , 50–65. Retrieved from: http://www.revneuropsi.com.ar/. Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2017). Working memory training in typically developing children: A meta-analysis of the available evidence. Developmental Psychology, 53 (4), 671–685. doi:10.1037/dev0000265. Schachar, R., & Logan, G. D. (1990). Impulsivity and inhibitory control in normal development and childhood psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 26 (5), 710–720. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.26.5.710. Schachar, R., Tannock, R., Marriott, M., & Logan, G. (1995). Deficient inhibitory control in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23 (4), 411–437. doi:10.1007/bf01447206. Sheese, B., & Lipina, S. (2011). Funciones ejecutivas: consideraciones sobre su evaluación y el diseño de intervenciones orientadas a optimizarlas. En S. Lipina y M. Sigman (Eds.). La pizarra de Babel. Puentes entre neurociencia, psicología y educación (pp. 229-242). Buenos Aires: Libros del Zorzal. Stelzer, F. (2014). Inteligencia, funciones ejecutivas y temperamento. sus relaciones al inicio de la escolaridad básica (tesis doctoral). Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Retrieved from: http://www.mdp.edu.ar/psicologia/psico/doctorado/tesis/stelzer.pdf. Stelzer, F., Andés, M. L., Canet-Juric, L., & Introzzi, I. (2016). Memoria de Trabajo e Inteligencia Fluida. Una Revisión de sus Relaciones. Acta de Investigación Psicológica-Psychological Research Records, 6 (1), 2302–2316. doi:10.1016/s2007-4719(16)30051-5. Thurstone, L. L., & Yela, M. (2012). Test de percepción de diferencias (caras-r). Madrid: Tea. Tiego, J., Testa, R., Bellgrove, M. A., Pantelis, C., & Whittle, S. (2018). A hierarchical model of inhibitory control. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 , 1339. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339. Traverso, L., Fontana, M., Usai, M. C., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2018). Response inhibition and interference suppression in individuals with down syndrome compared to typically developing children. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 . doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00660. Van Gerven, P. W. M., Hurks, P. P. M., Bovend’Eerdt, T. J. H., & Adam, J. J. (2016). Switch hands! mapping proactive and reactive cognitive control across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 52 (6), 960–971. doi:10.1037/dev0000116. Vara, A. S., Pang, E. W., Vidal, J., Anagnostou, E., & Taylor, M. J. (2014). Neural mechanisms of inhibitory control continue to mature in adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 , 129–139. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2014.08.009. Verbruggen, F., Chambers, C. D., & Logan, G. D. (2013). Fictitious inhibitory differences: How skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies. Psychological Science, 24 (3), 352–362. doi:10.1177/0956797612457390. Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33 (5), 647–661. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014. Volckaert, A. M. S., & Noël, M. P. (2015). Training executive function in preschoolers reduce externalizing behaviors. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4 (1), 37–47. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2015.02.001. Volckaert, A. M. S., & Noël, M. P. (2016). Externalizing behavior problems in preschoolers: Impact of an inhibition training. Journal of Psychological Abnormalities, 5 , 154. doi:10.4172/2471-9900.1000154. Zellner, M., & Baüml, K. (2004). Retrieval inhibition in episodic recall. In A. Mecklinger, H. Zimmer, & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Bound in memory: Insights from behavioral and neuropsychological studies (pp.1–26). Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag. Zhao, X., Chen, L., & Maes, J. H. (2016). Training and transfer effects of response inhibition training in children and adults. Developmental Science, 20 (6), 1–12. doi:10.1111/desc.12511. Zhao, X., & Jia, L. (2018). Training and transfer effects of interference control training in children and young adults. Psychological Research, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1007-6. info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text text/xml application/pdf Publication Inhibition constitutes one of the main executive functions and it is important to more complex skills such as fluid intelligence. Actually, there is an agreement on distinguishing three inhibitory types: perceptual, cognitive and response inhibition. Several studies show the differential engagement of these inhibitory types in different skills. However, there is no registered evidence about the differential relation of inhibitory types with fluid intelligence. This inquiry is especially important during the first school years, since in this stage, inhibitory processes would already be differentiated, and inhibitory processes and fluid intelligence are linked to the performance of children in the school setting. For these reasons, the goal of this work is to study the relation and contribution of perceptual, cognitive, and response inhibition with fluid intelligence, in children in the first years of primary school. For that purpose, a sample of children from six to eight years old (N = 178) was tested with a perceptual inhibition task (perception of similarities and differences task); a cognitive inhibition task (proactive interference task); a response inhibition task (stop signal task); and a fluid intelligence task (progressive matrices task). We observed significant correlations between perceptual and response inhibition and fluid intelligence (controlling for age), but only perceptual inhibition explains significantly part of the performance in the fluid intelligence task. This study provides data about the specific contribution, during childhood, of an inhibitory type to fluid intelligence and contributes empirical evidence in support of the non-unitary approach of inhibition. Journal article Aydmune, Yesica Introzzi, Isabel 1 Zamora, Eliana Vanesa Stelzer, Florencia 13 childhood fluid intelligence Perceptual inhibition cognitive inhibition response inhibition https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4231/3657 2020-01-20 https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4231/3544 39 2020-01-20T22:24:32Z https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4231 10.21500/20112084.4231 2011-7922 2011-2084 2020-01-20T22:24:32Z 29

Procesos inhibitorios e inteligencia fluida: su desempeño en los primeros años de escolaridad .

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares

Procesos inhibitorios e inteligencia fluida: su desempeño en los primeros años de escolaridad
.