Titulo:
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn
.
Sumario:
Mi objetivo en este artículo es comparar la filosofía de la ciencia de Heidegger con la de Thomas Kuhn. Con esta comparación quiero perseguir dos objetivos: 1) usar el arsenal conceptual de Kuhn para hacer más clara la posición de Heidegger; y 2) mostrar que las posiciones de Heidegger y Kuhn no son tan diferentes como cabría esperar. Por lo tanto, sugeriré que estas filosofías pueden ser compatibles. Mostraré que si bien hay diferencias, también hay muchas continuidades. Abordaré tres cuestiones: 1) las diferencias y similitudes entre la noción de paradigma de Kuhn y la noción de mundo de Heidegger; 2) los conceptos análogos de "ciencia normal" y "pensamiento calculador"; y 3) la fuente de inteligibilida... Ver más
Guardado en:
0120-1468
2665-3834
63
2021-01-15
1
16
Franciscanum - 2021
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
metarevistapublica_unisanbuenaventura_franciscanum_73_article_4716 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Franciscanum |
| title |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn |
| spellingShingle |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn Belgrano, Mateo Science Paradigm World Being Thinking Ciencia Paradigma Mundo Pensamiento |
| title_short |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn |
| title_full |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn |
| title_fullStr |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn |
| title_sort |
mundo y paradigma en heidegger y kuhn |
| title_eng |
World and Paradigm in Heidegger and Kuhn |
| description |
Mi objetivo en este artículo es comparar la filosofía de la ciencia de Heidegger con la de Thomas Kuhn. Con esta comparación quiero perseguir dos objetivos: 1) usar el arsenal conceptual de Kuhn para hacer más clara la posición de Heidegger; y 2) mostrar que las posiciones de Heidegger y Kuhn no son tan diferentes como cabría esperar. Por lo tanto, sugeriré que estas filosofías pueden ser compatibles. Mostraré que si bien hay diferencias, también hay muchas continuidades. Abordaré tres cuestiones: 1) las diferencias y similitudes entre la noción de paradigma de Kuhn y la noción de mundo de Heidegger; 2) los conceptos análogos de "ciencia normal" y "pensamiento calculador"; y 3) la fuente de inteligibilidad en ambos autores. Aquí, creo, es donde radica la principal diferencia entre ambos pensadores.
|
| description_eng |
My goal in this paper is to compare Heidegger’s philosophy of science with Thomas Kuhn’s. With this comparison I want to pursue two goals: 1) using Kuhn’s arsenal of conceptual tools, to make Heidegger’s position appear in a clearer fashion; and 2) to show that Heidegger’s and Kuhn’s positions are not so different as one might expect. I will, thus, suggest that these philosophies can be compatible. I will show that, even if there are differences, there are many similarities as well. I will address three issues: 1) the differences and similarities between Kuhn’s notion of paradigm and Heidegger’s notion of world; 2) the analogous concepts of “normal science” and “calculating thinking”; and 3) the source of intelligibility in both authors. Here, I believe, is where the main difference between both thinkers lays.
|
| author |
Belgrano, Mateo |
| author_facet |
Belgrano, Mateo |
| topic |
Science Paradigm World Being Thinking Ciencia Paradigma Mundo Pensamiento |
| topic_facet |
Science Paradigm World Being Thinking Ciencia Paradigma Mundo Pensamiento |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Ciencia Paradigma Mundo Pensamiento |
| citationvolume |
63 |
| citationissue |
175 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 175 , Año 2021 : Franciscanum 175 |
| publisher |
Universidad San Buenaventura |
| ispartofjournal |
Franciscanum |
| source |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Franciscanum/article/view/4716 |
| language |
eng |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Franciscanum - 2021 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references_eng |
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005. Carnap, Rudolf. «The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis on language». In Logical positivism, ed. Alfred Ayer, 60-81. London: Allen & Unwin, 1959. Dreyfus, Hubert. «How Heidegger defends the possibility of a correspondence theory of truth with respect to the entities of natural science». In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. Theodore R. Schatzki, 159-171. London: Routledge, 2005. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796220.003.0006 Emad, Parvis and Maly, Kenneth. «Translators' Foreword». In Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowing), auth. Martin Heidegger, XX–XXI. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999. Glazebrook, Trish. Heidegger’s philosophy of science. New York: Fordham University Press, 2000. Haugeland, John. Dasein Disclosed. Cambdridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2013. Heidegger, Martin. Basic Questions of Philosophy. Selected «Problems» of «Logic». Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994. Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. New York: SUNY Press, 1996. Heidegger, Martin. Contributions to Philosophy (Of the Event). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012. Heidegger, Martin. Discourse on thinking. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1966. Heidegger, Martin. Identity and Difference. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1969. Heidegger, Martin. Logic as the Question Concerning the Essence of Language. New York: SUNY Press, 2009. Heidegger, Martin. Nietzsche. 2. The Eternal Recurrence of the Same. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco, 1991. Heidegger, Martin. Off the Beaten Track. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Heidegger, Martin. Pathmarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Heidegger, Martin. The Question Concerning Technology. New York/London: Garland Publishing, 1977. Heidegger, Martin. Towards the Definition of Philosophy. New York: Continuum, 2008. Heidegger, Martin. What is Called Thinking? New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1968. Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. «Kuhn's conception of incommensurability». Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21.3 (1990): 481-492. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(90)90006-t Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970. Lafont, Cristina. Heidegger, Language, and World- Disclosure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Lattis, James M. Between Copernicus and Galileo: Christoph Clavius and the Collapse of Ptolemaic Cosmology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/221058785x01065 Loscerbo, John. Being and Technology: A Study in the Philosophy of Martin Heidegger. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1981. Masterman, Margaret. «The Nature of a Paradigm». In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. Imre Lakatos, Alan Musgrave, 59-90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Philipse, Herman. Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being. A Critical Interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998. Polt, Richard. The Emergency of Being. On Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy. New York: Cornell University Press, 2006. Pöggeler, Otto. The Paths of Heidegger’s Life and Thought. New York: Humanity Books, 1998. Robbins, Breat Dean. «A reading of Kuhn in light of Heidegger as a response to Hoeller's critique of Giorgi». Janus Head 1, Vol. 1 (1998): 2-35. Rouse, Joseph. «Kuhn, Heidegger, and scientific realism». Man and World 3, Vol. 14 (1981): 269-290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01248749 Sankey, Howard. «Kuhn's changing concept of incommensurability». The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4, Vol 44 (1993): 759-774 Sheehan, Thomas. Making Sense of Heidegger: A Paradigm Shift. London: Rowman et Littlefield, 2015. Vidal-Folch, Ignacio. «Entrevista a Mario Bunge: Las frases de Heidegger son las propias de un esquizofrénico». Revista de Pedagogía 84, Vol. 29 (2008): 187-190. Welch, Cyril. «Review of The Anatomy of Disillusion: Martin Heidegger’s Notion of Truth by W. B. Macomber». Man and World 3 (1970): 135-146. Wisser, Richard. Heidegger in Conversation. New Delhi: Arnold-Heinemann Publishers, 1977. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2021-01-15 |
| date_accessioned |
2021-01-15T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2021-01-15T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Franciscanum/article/view/4716 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.21500/01201468.4716 |
| issn |
0120-1468 |
| eissn |
2665-3834 |
| doi |
10.21500/01201468.4716 |
| citationstartpage |
1 |
| citationendpage |
16 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Franciscanum/article/download/4716/3847 |
| _version_ |
1811200885566472192 |
| spelling |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn World and Paradigm in Heidegger and Kuhn Mi objetivo en este artículo es comparar la filosofía de la ciencia de Heidegger con la de Thomas Kuhn. Con esta comparación quiero perseguir dos objetivos: 1) usar el arsenal conceptual de Kuhn para hacer más clara la posición de Heidegger; y 2) mostrar que las posiciones de Heidegger y Kuhn no son tan diferentes como cabría esperar. Por lo tanto, sugeriré que estas filosofías pueden ser compatibles. Mostraré que si bien hay diferencias, también hay muchas continuidades. Abordaré tres cuestiones: 1) las diferencias y similitudes entre la noción de paradigma de Kuhn y la noción de mundo de Heidegger; 2) los conceptos análogos de "ciencia normal" y "pensamiento calculador"; y 3) la fuente de inteligibilidad en ambos autores. Aquí, creo, es donde radica la principal diferencia entre ambos pensadores. My goal in this paper is to compare Heidegger’s philosophy of science with Thomas Kuhn’s. With this comparison I want to pursue two goals: 1) using Kuhn’s arsenal of conceptual tools, to make Heidegger’s position appear in a clearer fashion; and 2) to show that Heidegger’s and Kuhn’s positions are not so different as one might expect. I will, thus, suggest that these philosophies can be compatible. I will show that, even if there are differences, there are many similarities as well. I will address three issues: 1) the differences and similarities between Kuhn’s notion of paradigm and Heidegger’s notion of world; 2) the analogous concepts of “normal science” and “calculating thinking”; and 3) the source of intelligibility in both authors. Here, I believe, is where the main difference between both thinkers lays. Belgrano, Mateo Science Paradigm World Being Thinking Ciencia Paradigma Mundo Ser Pensamiento 63 175 Núm. 175 , Año 2021 : Franciscanum 175 Artículo de revista Journal article 2021-01-15T00:00:00Z 2021-01-15T00:00:00Z 2021-01-15 application/pdf Universidad San Buenaventura Franciscanum 0120-1468 2665-3834 https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Franciscanum/article/view/4716 10.21500/01201468.4716 https://doi.org/10.21500/01201468.4716 eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Franciscanum - 2021 1 16 Bourdieu, Pierre. The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005. Carnap, Rudolf. «The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis on language». In Logical positivism, ed. Alfred Ayer, 60-81. London: Allen & Unwin, 1959. Dreyfus, Hubert. «How Heidegger defends the possibility of a correspondence theory of truth with respect to the entities of natural science». In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. Theodore R. Schatzki, 159-171. London: Routledge, 2005. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796220.003.0006 Emad, Parvis and Maly, Kenneth. «Translators' Foreword». In Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowing), auth. Martin Heidegger, XX–XXI. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999. Glazebrook, Trish. Heidegger’s philosophy of science. New York: Fordham University Press, 2000. Haugeland, John. Dasein Disclosed. Cambdridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2013. Heidegger, Martin. Basic Questions of Philosophy. Selected «Problems» of «Logic». Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994. Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. New York: SUNY Press, 1996. Heidegger, Martin. Contributions to Philosophy (Of the Event). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012. Heidegger, Martin. Discourse on thinking. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1966. Heidegger, Martin. Identity and Difference. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1969. Heidegger, Martin. Logic as the Question Concerning the Essence of Language. New York: SUNY Press, 2009. Heidegger, Martin. Nietzsche. 2. The Eternal Recurrence of the Same. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco, 1991. Heidegger, Martin. Off the Beaten Track. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Heidegger, Martin. Pathmarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Heidegger, Martin. The Question Concerning Technology. New York/London: Garland Publishing, 1977. Heidegger, Martin. Towards the Definition of Philosophy. New York: Continuum, 2008. Heidegger, Martin. What is Called Thinking? New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1968. Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. «Kuhn's conception of incommensurability». Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21.3 (1990): 481-492. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(90)90006-t Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970. Lafont, Cristina. Heidegger, Language, and World- Disclosure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Lattis, James M. Between Copernicus and Galileo: Christoph Clavius and the Collapse of Ptolemaic Cosmology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/221058785x01065 Loscerbo, John. Being and Technology: A Study in the Philosophy of Martin Heidegger. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1981. Masterman, Margaret. «The Nature of a Paradigm». In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. Imre Lakatos, Alan Musgrave, 59-90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Philipse, Herman. Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being. A Critical Interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998. Polt, Richard. The Emergency of Being. On Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy. New York: Cornell University Press, 2006. Pöggeler, Otto. The Paths of Heidegger’s Life and Thought. New York: Humanity Books, 1998. Robbins, Breat Dean. «A reading of Kuhn in light of Heidegger as a response to Hoeller's critique of Giorgi». Janus Head 1, Vol. 1 (1998): 2-35. Rouse, Joseph. «Kuhn, Heidegger, and scientific realism». Man and World 3, Vol. 14 (1981): 269-290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01248749 Sankey, Howard. «Kuhn's changing concept of incommensurability». The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4, Vol 44 (1993): 759-774 Sheehan, Thomas. Making Sense of Heidegger: A Paradigm Shift. London: Rowman et Littlefield, 2015. Vidal-Folch, Ignacio. «Entrevista a Mario Bunge: Las frases de Heidegger son las propias de un esquizofrénico». Revista de Pedagogía 84, Vol. 29 (2008): 187-190. Welch, Cyril. «Review of The Anatomy of Disillusion: Martin Heidegger’s Notion of Truth by W. B. Macomber». Man and World 3 (1970): 135-146. Wisser, Richard. Heidegger in Conversation. New Delhi: Arnold-Heinemann Publishers, 1977. https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Franciscanum/article/download/4716/3847 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |