El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas
.
Las empresas familiares desempeñan un rol fundamental en la economía, ya que constituyen una amplia mayoría de empresas en los distintos países y sectores y realizan un importante aporte al empleo, la producción y la generación de valor. Sin embargo, ocupan un espacio reducido en la literatura económica y empresarial, que generalmente estudia el comportamiento de las empresas sin considerar esta característica. Esto es incluso más marcado en el caso de la literatura sobre innovación, aun cuando las empresas familiares realizan también un aporte relevante a la economía a través de innovaciones productivas, organizativas y comerciales. Este artículo pretende cubrir este vacío en el caso argentino, analizando la conducta innovadora de estas fi... Ver más
1657-1959
2346-2116
2022-06-15
205
240
Carolina Quintá Goy, Darío Milesi - 2022
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id |
metarevistapublica_uexternado_revistalapropiedadinmaterial_42_article_7885 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas The role of familiness in the innovation and appropriation strategies of Argentine family businesses Las empresas familiares desempeñan un rol fundamental en la economía, ya que constituyen una amplia mayoría de empresas en los distintos países y sectores y realizan un importante aporte al empleo, la producción y la generación de valor. Sin embargo, ocupan un espacio reducido en la literatura económica y empresarial, que generalmente estudia el comportamiento de las empresas sin considerar esta característica. Esto es incluso más marcado en el caso de la literatura sobre innovación, aun cuando las empresas familiares realizan también un aporte relevante a la economía a través de innovaciones productivas, organizativas y comerciales. Este artículo pretende cubrir este vacío en el caso argentino, analizando la conducta innovadora de estas firmas y, fundamentalmente, sus estrategias de apropiación. Para ello se basa en evidencia empírica derivada de la más reciente encuesta de innovación argentina (ENDEI II) que cuenta con datos sobre 3.944 empresas, de las cuales 2.945 son familiares. Para analizar el vínculo entre el carácter familiar de las empresas, sus actividades de innovación y sus estrategias de apropiación se recurre al concepto de familiness, que alude a aquellos elementos idiosincráticos que surgen de la interacción entre los miembros de la familia y su participación en la empresa, y le confieren a la misma su carácter distintivo. Los resultados del estudio muestran que la familiness no se presenta con la misma intensidad (débil o fuerte) en todas las empresas familiares, y que tanto la actividad innovadora como la forma en que las empresas familiares se apropian de los resultados de innovación difieren de acuerdo con su grado de familiness. Family businesses fulfill a fundamental role in the economy as they constitute a vast majority of companies in different countries and sectors and make an important contribution to employment, production and generating value. Nevertheless, they occupy a small space in the business and corporate literature, which generally studies the behavior of companies without considering this feature. This is even more so in the literature on innovation, although family businesses also make a relevant contribution to the economy through productive, organizational, and commercial innovations. This article intends to fill this gap in the Argentine case, analyzing the innovative behavior of these firms and, fundamentally, their appropriability strategies. To do so, empirical evidence is used from the most recent Argentine innovation survey (ENDEI II) which has data on 3.944 companies, of which 2.954 are family businesses. To analyse the link between the family nature of the businesses, their innovation activities and their appropriability strategies, the concept of familiness is resorted to, which alludes to those idiosyncratic elements that arise from the interaction of the family members and their participation in the business, imbuing it with its distinctive character. The results of the study show that familiness does not appear with the same intensity (weak or strong) in all family businesses, and that both innovative activity and the way in which family businesses appropriate innovation results, differ according to their degree of familiness. Quintá Goy, Carolina Milesi, Darío Familiness; Appropriation; Intellectual Property Rights; Family Business; Innovation familiness; apropiación; derechos de propiedad intelectual; empresas familiares; innovación 33 Núm. 33 , Año 2022 : Enero-Junio Artículo de revista Journal article 2022-06-15T11:59:03Z 2022-06-15T11:59:03Z 2022-06-15 application/pdf text/html Centro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectual Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial 1657-1959 2346-2116 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/7885 10.18601/16571959.n33.08 https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n33.08 spa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Carolina Quintá Goy, Darío Milesi - 2022 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. 205 240 Aiello, Francesco; Cardamone, Paola; Mannarino, Lidia y Pupo, Valeria. Does external R&D matter for family firm innovation? Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Working Paper Series n.° 202002, University of Calabria, Department of Economics, Statistics and Finance “Giovanni Anania” – DESF, 2020. Aronoff, Craig. E. y Ward, John. L. Family business governance: Maximizing family and business potential. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. A Family Business Publication, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116016. Arzubiaga, Unai; Maseda, Amaia e Iturralde, Txomin. “Exploratory and exploitative innovation in family businesses: the moderating role of the family firm image and family involvement in top management”. Review of Managerial Science, n.° 13, 2019, pp. 1-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0239-y. Barros, Ismael: Hernán-Gómez, Juan y Martín-Cruz, Natalia. “Familiness and socioemotional wealth in Spanish family firms: An empirical examination”. European Journal of Family Business, n.° 7, 2017, pp. 14-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.06.004. Bannò, Marisole. “Propensity to patent by family firms”. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 7, n.° 4, 2016, pp. 1-11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.07.002. Barnes, Louis B. y Hershon, Simon A. “Transferring power in family business”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 2, 1989, pp. 187-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00187.x. Barry, Bernard. “The development of organization structure in the family firm”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 3, 1989, pp. 293-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00293.x. Bork, David. La empresa familiar frente a sus retos. Madrid: Grupo Planeta, 2013. Bruton, Garry; Ahlstrom, David y Wan, Johnny C. C. “Turnaround in East Asian firms: evidence from ethnic Overseas Chinese communities”. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24, n.° 6, 2003, pp. 519-540. DOI: 10.1002/smj.312. Cabrera-Suárez, Katiuska; De Saá-Pérez, Petra y García-Almeida, Desiderio. “The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm”. Family Business Review, n.° 14, 2001, pp. 37-46. DOI:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x. Cano-Rubio, Myriam; Fuentes-Lombardo, Guadalupe; Hernández-Ortiz, María J. y Vallejo-Martos, Manuel C. “Composition of familiness: Perspectives of social capital and open systems”. European Journal of Family Business, vol. 6, n.° 2, 2016, pp. 75-85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2016.12.002. Casrud, Alan L. “Meanderings of a resurrected psychologist or lessons learned in creating a program”. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, vol. 1, n.° 19, 1994, pp. 39-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401900103. Chrisman, James J.; Chua, Jess H. y Litz, Reginald. “A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration”. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 4, n.° 18, 2003, pp. 467-472. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00055-7. Chrisman, James J.; Chua, Jess H. y Steier, Lloyd P. “An introduction to theories of family business”. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, n.° 4, 2003, pp. 441-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00052-1. Chrisman, James J.; Chua, Jess H. y Sharma, Pramodita. “Current trends and future directions in Family business management studies: Toward a theory of the family firm”. Coleman White Paper Series, vol. 4, 2003. Chua, James H.; Chrisman, Jess J. y Sharma, Pramodita. “Defining the Family Business by Behavior”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 23, n.° 4, 1999, pp. 19-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402. Cruz, Cristina y Nordqvist, Mattias. “Entrepreneurial orientation in family businesses: A generational perspective”. Small Business Economics, n.° 38, 2012, pp. 33-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9265-8. Daspit, Joshua J.; Long, Rebecca G. y Pearson, Allison W. “How familiness affects innovation outcomes via absorptive capacity: A dynamic capability perspective of the family firm”. Journal of Family Business Strategy. Elsevier, vol. 10, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 133-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.11.003. Davis, Peter. “Realizing the potential of the family business”. Organizational Dynamics, vol. 12, n.° 1, 1983, pp. 47-56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(83)90026-8. De Massis, Alfredo; Di Minin, Alberto y Frattini, Federico. “Family-Driven Innovation: Resolving the Paradox in Family Firms”. California Management Review, vol. 58, n.° 1, 2015, pp. 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.58.1.5. De Massis, Alfredo; Sharma, Pramodita; Chua, James H. y Chrisman, Jess J. Family Business Studies: An Annotated Bibliography. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012. DOI: 10.4337/9781781002988. Dosi, Giovanni; Marengo, Luigi y Pasquali, Corrado. “How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation”. Research Policy, vol. 35, n.° 8, 2006, pp. 1110-1121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.003. Dyer, W. Gibb. “The family: The missing variable in organizational research”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 4, n.° 27, 2003, pp. 401-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00018. Fagerberg, Jan; Martin, Ben R. y Andersen, Esben S. (eds.). Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges. Croydon, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013. Disponible en: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4103729/mod_resource/content/1/Fagerberg-MaertinAndersen-Innovation%20Studies%202013.pdf. Fahed-Sreih, Josiane y Djoundourian, Salpie. “Determinants of longevity and success in Lebanese family businesses: An exploratory study”. Family Business Review, vol. 19, n.° 3, 2006, pp. 225-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00071.x. Filser, Matthias; De Massis, Alfredo D.; Gast, Johanna; Kraus, Sascha y Niemand, Thomas. “Tracing the Roots of Innovativeness in Family SMEs: The Effect of Family Functionality and Socioemotional Wealth”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 35, n.° 4, 2018, pp. 609-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12433. Frank, Hermann; Lueger, Manfred; Nosé, Lavinia y Suchy, Daniela. “The concept of ‘Familiness’: Literature review and systems theory-based reflections”. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 1, n.° 3, 2010, pp. 119-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.08.001. Frank, Hermann; Kessler, Alexander; Rusch, Thomas; Suess–Reyes, Julia y Weismeier–Sammer, Daniela. “Capturing the Familiness of Family Businesses: Development of the Family Influence Familiness Scale (FIFS)”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 41, n.° 5, 2017, pp. 709-742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12229. Frank, Hermann; Kessler, Alexander; Bachner, Christine; Fuetsch, Elena y Suess-Reyes, Julia. “Principles for innovation management in family firms: An analysis of long-term successful good practices with a practitioner validation of the principles”. Journal of Family Business Management, vol. 9, n.° 3, 2019, pp. 319-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2018-0049. Gallo, Miguel A. “The role of family business and its distinctive characteristic behaviour in industrial activity”. Family Business Review, vol. 8, n.° 2, 1995, pp. 83-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00083.x. Gallo, Miguel A. y Sveen, Jannicke. “Internationalizing the family business: Facilitating and restraining factors”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 4, 1991, pp. 181-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00181.x. Gersick, Kelin; Davis, John A., Mccollom Hampton, Marion y Lansberg, Ivan. Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business. Harvard Business School Press, 1997. Gómez-Mejía, Luis R.; Haynes, Katalin T.; Nuñez-Nickel, Manuel; Jacobson, Kathyrn J. L. y Moyano-Fuentes, José. “Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-Controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills”. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 1, n.° 52, 2007, pp. 106-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106. Habbershon, Timothy G. y Williams, Mary L. “A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms”. Family Business Review, vol. 12, n.° 1, 1999, pp. 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x. Habbershon, Timothy G.; Williams, Mary L. y MacMillan, Ian. “A Unified Systems Perspective of Family Firm Performance”. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, n.° 4, 2003, pp. 451-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00053-3. Kellermanns, Franz W. y Eddleston, Kimberly A. “A family perspective on when conflict benefits family firm’s performance”. Journal of Business Research, vol. 60, n.° 10, 2007, pp. 1048-1057. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.018. König, Andreas; Kammerlander, Nadine y Enders, Albrecht. “The family innovator’s dilemma: how family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms”. Academy of Management Review, vol. 3, n.° 38, 2013, pp. 418-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0162. Lansberg, Ivan S.; Perrow, Edith L. y Rogolsky, Sharon. “Family business as an emerging field”. Family Business Review, vol. 1, n.° 1, 1988, pp. 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00001.x. Levin, Richard C.; Klervorick, Alvin K.; Nelson, Richard y Winter, Sidney. “Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development”. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 18, n.° 3, 1987, pp. 783-831. Litz, Reginald A. “The family business: Toward definitional clarity”. Family Business Review, vol. 8, n.° 2, 1995, pp. 71-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00071.x. López Fernández, María C.; Serrano Bedia, Ana M.; Gómez López, Raquel y García Piqueres, Gema. “El efecto del familiness en la performance innovadora de las empresas familiares: un análisis exploratorio”. Revista de Empresa Familiar, vol. 2, n.° 2, 2012, pp. 7-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v2i2.4026. Loschky, Alexander. Reviewing the Nomenclature for High-Technology Trade. The Sectoral Approach. OCDE, Statistics Directorate, STD/SES/WPTGS (9), París, 2010. Disponible en: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC57117/reviewing%20the%20nomenclature%20for%20hightechnology%20-%202010%20edition.pdf. Manzaneque, Montserrat; Diéguez-Soto, Julio y Garrido-Moreno, Aurora. “Technological innovation inputs, outputs, and family management: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms”. Innovation: Organization y Management, vol. 20, n.° 4, 2018, pp. 299-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2018.1444491. Meroño-Cerdán, Ángel L.; López-Nicolás, Carolina y Molina-Castillo, Francisco. J. “Risk aversion, innovation, and performance in family firms”. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 27, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 189-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1325569. Milesi, Darío; Petelski, Natalia y Verre, Vladimiro. “Innovation and appropriation mechanisms: Evidence from Argentine microdata”. Technovation, vol. 33, n.° 1-2, 2013, pp. 78-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.12.001. Milesi, Darío; Petelski, Natalia y Verre, Vladimiro. “Apropiación privada de los resultados de innovación”. En: G. Yoguel, V. Robert y F. Barletta (comps.). Tópicos de la teoría evolucionista neoshumpeteriana de la innovación y el cambio tecnológico, vol. 1, pp. 357-376, Argentina: UNGS, 2014. Minichilli, Alessandro; Corbetta, Guido y MacMillan, Ian. “Top Management Teams in Family-Controlled Companies: ‘Familiness’, ‘Faultlines’, and Their Impact on Financial Performance”. Journal of Management Studies, Special Issue: The Family and Enterprise: Unpacking the Connections, vol. 47, n.° 2, 2010, pp. 205–222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00888.x. Neubauer, Fred y Lank, Alden G. La empresa familiar: cómo dirigirla para que perdure. Bilbao: Deusto, 1999. Peña-López, José A. y Sánchez-Santos, José M. (2011). El capital social como recurso de la empresa familiar: la familiness. La Coruña, España: Netbiblo, 2011. Poza, Ernesto J. Empresas familiares, 3a ed. Boston, Estados Unidos: Cengage Learning Editores S.A. de C.V., 2011. Press, Eduardo. Empresas de familia: del conflicto a la eficiencia. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Granica, 2011. Rondi, Emanuela; De Massis, Alfredo y Kotlar, Josip. “Unlocking innovation potential: A typology of family business innovation postures and the critical role of the family system”. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 4, n.° 4, 2019. DOI: 10. 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.12.001. Rosenblatt, Paul C.; De Mik, Leni; Anderson, Roxanne M. y Johnson, Patricia A. The family in business: Understanding and dealing with the challenge’s entrepreneurial families face. San Francisco, EE. UU.: Jossey Bass Business & Management Series, 1985. Shanker, Melissa C. y Astrachan, Joseph H. “Myths and realities: family businesses’ contribution to the US economy, a framework for assessing family business statistics”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 9, 1996, pp. 107-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00107.x. Siebels, Jan‐Folke y Knyphausen-Aufseβ, Dodo zu. 2012. “A Review of Theory in Family Business Research: The Implications for Corporate Governance”. International Journal of Management Reviews, n.° 14, 2012, pp. 280-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00317.x. Sirmon, David G. y Hitt, Michael A. “Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management and Wealth Creation in Family Firms”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 27, n.° 4, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00013. Staniewski, Marcin y Awruk, Katarzyna. “Systems Approach to Entrepreneurial Success: The Theoretical Discussion on the Significance of Family Factors for Effective Entrepreneurship”. En: Ana Tur Porcar y Domingo Ribeiro Soriano (eds.). Inside the Mind of the Entrepreneur. Cognition, Personality Traits, Intention, and Gender Behavior, pp. 163-174. Springer, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62455-6_12. Stern, Milton H. Inside the Family Held Business: A practical guide for ntrepreneurs and Their Advisors. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1986. Teece, David J. “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy”. Research Policy, vol. 15, n.° 6, 1986, pp. 285-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2. Vélez-Montes, Diego; Holguín-Lagos, Harry; De La Hoz-Pinzón, Gerardo A.; Durán-Bobadilla, Yazmín y Gutiérrez-Ayala, Irma. Dinámica de la empresa familiar pyme: estudio exploratorio en Colombia. Bogotá: Fundación para el Desarrollo Sostenible, 2008. Ward, John L. Keeping the Family Business Healthy: How to Plan for Continuing Growth, Profitability, and Family Leadership. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1987 (2011, impreso). Ward, John y Dolan, Christina. “Defining and describing family business ownership configurations”. Family Business Review, vol. 11, n.° 4, 1998, pp. 305-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00305.x. Zahra, Shaker A. “Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms”. Family Business Review, vol. 18, n.° 1, 2005, pp. 23-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00028.x. Zahra, Shaker A. “Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms: The Wellspring of the Regenerative Capability”. Family Business Review, vol. 31, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 216-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518776871. https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7885/12513 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7885/12514 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |
institution |
UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA |
thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
country_str |
Colombia |
collection |
Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial |
title |
El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas |
spellingShingle |
El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas Quintá Goy, Carolina Milesi, Darío Familiness; Appropriation; Intellectual Property Rights; Family Business; Innovation familiness; apropiación; derechos de propiedad intelectual; empresas familiares; innovación |
title_short |
El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas |
title_full |
El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas |
title_fullStr |
El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas |
title_full_unstemmed |
El rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas |
title_sort |
el rol de la familiness en las estrategias de innovación y apropiación de las empresas familiares argentinas |
title_eng |
The role of familiness in the innovation and appropriation strategies of Argentine family businesses |
description |
Las empresas familiares desempeñan un rol fundamental en la economía, ya que constituyen una amplia mayoría de empresas en los distintos países y sectores y realizan un importante aporte al empleo, la producción y la generación de valor. Sin embargo, ocupan un espacio reducido en la literatura económica y empresarial, que generalmente estudia el comportamiento de las empresas sin considerar esta característica. Esto es incluso más marcado en el caso de la literatura sobre innovación, aun cuando las empresas familiares realizan también un aporte relevante a la economía a través de innovaciones productivas, organizativas y comerciales. Este artículo pretende cubrir este vacío en el caso argentino, analizando la conducta innovadora de estas firmas y, fundamentalmente, sus estrategias de apropiación. Para ello se basa en evidencia empírica derivada de la más reciente encuesta de innovación argentina (ENDEI II) que cuenta con datos sobre 3.944 empresas, de las cuales 2.945 son familiares. Para analizar el vínculo entre el carácter familiar de las empresas, sus actividades de innovación y sus estrategias de apropiación se recurre al concepto de familiness, que alude a aquellos elementos idiosincráticos que surgen de la interacción entre los miembros de la familia y su participación en la empresa, y le confieren a la misma su carácter distintivo. Los resultados del estudio muestran que la familiness no se presenta con la misma intensidad (débil o fuerte) en todas las empresas familiares, y que tanto la actividad innovadora como la forma en que las empresas familiares se apropian de los resultados de innovación difieren de acuerdo con su grado de familiness.
|
description_eng |
Family businesses fulfill a fundamental role in the economy as they constitute a vast majority of companies in different countries and sectors and make an important contribution to employment, production and generating value. Nevertheless, they occupy a small space in the business and corporate literature, which generally studies the behavior of companies without considering this feature. This is even more so in the literature on innovation, although family businesses also make a relevant contribution to the economy through productive, organizational, and commercial innovations. This article intends to fill this gap in the Argentine case, analyzing the innovative behavior of these firms and, fundamentally, their appropriability strategies. To do so, empirical evidence is used from the most recent Argentine innovation survey (ENDEI II) which has data on 3.944 companies, of which 2.954 are family businesses. To analyse the link between the family nature of the businesses, their innovation activities and their appropriability strategies, the concept of familiness is resorted to, which alludes to those idiosyncratic elements that arise from the interaction of the family members and their participation in the business, imbuing it with its distinctive character. The results of the study show that familiness does not appear with the same intensity (weak or strong) in all family businesses, and that both innovative activity and the way in which family businesses appropriate innovation results, differ according to their degree of familiness.
|
author |
Quintá Goy, Carolina Milesi, Darío |
author_facet |
Quintá Goy, Carolina Milesi, Darío |
topic |
Familiness; Appropriation; Intellectual Property Rights; Family Business; Innovation familiness; apropiación; derechos de propiedad intelectual; empresas familiares; innovación |
topic_facet |
Familiness; Appropriation; Intellectual Property Rights; Family Business; Innovation familiness; apropiación; derechos de propiedad intelectual; empresas familiares; innovación |
topicspa_str_mv |
familiness; apropiación; derechos de propiedad intelectual; empresas familiares; innovación |
citationissue |
33 |
citationedition |
Núm. 33 , Año 2022 : Enero-Junio |
publisher |
Centro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectual |
ispartofjournal |
Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial |
source |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/7885 |
language |
spa |
format |
Article |
rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Carolina Quintá Goy, Darío Milesi - 2022 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
references |
Aiello, Francesco; Cardamone, Paola; Mannarino, Lidia y Pupo, Valeria. Does external R&D matter for family firm innovation? Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Working Paper Series n.° 202002, University of Calabria, Department of Economics, Statistics and Finance “Giovanni Anania” – DESF, 2020. Aronoff, Craig. E. y Ward, John. L. Family business governance: Maximizing family and business potential. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. A Family Business Publication, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116016. Arzubiaga, Unai; Maseda, Amaia e Iturralde, Txomin. “Exploratory and exploitative innovation in family businesses: the moderating role of the family firm image and family involvement in top management”. Review of Managerial Science, n.° 13, 2019, pp. 1-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0239-y. Barros, Ismael: Hernán-Gómez, Juan y Martín-Cruz, Natalia. “Familiness and socioemotional wealth in Spanish family firms: An empirical examination”. European Journal of Family Business, n.° 7, 2017, pp. 14-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.06.004. Bannò, Marisole. “Propensity to patent by family firms”. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 7, n.° 4, 2016, pp. 1-11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.07.002. Barnes, Louis B. y Hershon, Simon A. “Transferring power in family business”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 2, 1989, pp. 187-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00187.x. Barry, Bernard. “The development of organization structure in the family firm”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 3, 1989, pp. 293-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00293.x. Bork, David. La empresa familiar frente a sus retos. Madrid: Grupo Planeta, 2013. Bruton, Garry; Ahlstrom, David y Wan, Johnny C. C. “Turnaround in East Asian firms: evidence from ethnic Overseas Chinese communities”. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24, n.° 6, 2003, pp. 519-540. DOI: 10.1002/smj.312. Cabrera-Suárez, Katiuska; De Saá-Pérez, Petra y García-Almeida, Desiderio. “The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm”. Family Business Review, n.° 14, 2001, pp. 37-46. DOI:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x. Cano-Rubio, Myriam; Fuentes-Lombardo, Guadalupe; Hernández-Ortiz, María J. y Vallejo-Martos, Manuel C. “Composition of familiness: Perspectives of social capital and open systems”. European Journal of Family Business, vol. 6, n.° 2, 2016, pp. 75-85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2016.12.002. Casrud, Alan L. “Meanderings of a resurrected psychologist or lessons learned in creating a program”. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, vol. 1, n.° 19, 1994, pp. 39-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401900103. Chrisman, James J.; Chua, Jess H. y Litz, Reginald. “A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration”. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 4, n.° 18, 2003, pp. 467-472. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00055-7. Chrisman, James J.; Chua, Jess H. y Steier, Lloyd P. “An introduction to theories of family business”. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, n.° 4, 2003, pp. 441-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00052-1. Chrisman, James J.; Chua, Jess H. y Sharma, Pramodita. “Current trends and future directions in Family business management studies: Toward a theory of the family firm”. Coleman White Paper Series, vol. 4, 2003. Chua, James H.; Chrisman, Jess J. y Sharma, Pramodita. “Defining the Family Business by Behavior”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 23, n.° 4, 1999, pp. 19-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402. Cruz, Cristina y Nordqvist, Mattias. “Entrepreneurial orientation in family businesses: A generational perspective”. Small Business Economics, n.° 38, 2012, pp. 33-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9265-8. Daspit, Joshua J.; Long, Rebecca G. y Pearson, Allison W. “How familiness affects innovation outcomes via absorptive capacity: A dynamic capability perspective of the family firm”. Journal of Family Business Strategy. Elsevier, vol. 10, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 133-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.11.003. Davis, Peter. “Realizing the potential of the family business”. Organizational Dynamics, vol. 12, n.° 1, 1983, pp. 47-56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(83)90026-8. De Massis, Alfredo; Di Minin, Alberto y Frattini, Federico. “Family-Driven Innovation: Resolving the Paradox in Family Firms”. California Management Review, vol. 58, n.° 1, 2015, pp. 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.58.1.5. De Massis, Alfredo; Sharma, Pramodita; Chua, James H. y Chrisman, Jess J. Family Business Studies: An Annotated Bibliography. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012. DOI: 10.4337/9781781002988. Dosi, Giovanni; Marengo, Luigi y Pasquali, Corrado. “How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation”. Research Policy, vol. 35, n.° 8, 2006, pp. 1110-1121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.003. Dyer, W. Gibb. “The family: The missing variable in organizational research”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 4, n.° 27, 2003, pp. 401-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00018. Fagerberg, Jan; Martin, Ben R. y Andersen, Esben S. (eds.). Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges. Croydon, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013. Disponible en: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4103729/mod_resource/content/1/Fagerberg-MaertinAndersen-Innovation%20Studies%202013.pdf. Fahed-Sreih, Josiane y Djoundourian, Salpie. “Determinants of longevity and success in Lebanese family businesses: An exploratory study”. Family Business Review, vol. 19, n.° 3, 2006, pp. 225-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00071.x. Filser, Matthias; De Massis, Alfredo D.; Gast, Johanna; Kraus, Sascha y Niemand, Thomas. “Tracing the Roots of Innovativeness in Family SMEs: The Effect of Family Functionality and Socioemotional Wealth”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 35, n.° 4, 2018, pp. 609-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12433. Frank, Hermann; Lueger, Manfred; Nosé, Lavinia y Suchy, Daniela. “The concept of ‘Familiness’: Literature review and systems theory-based reflections”. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 1, n.° 3, 2010, pp. 119-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.08.001. Frank, Hermann; Kessler, Alexander; Rusch, Thomas; Suess–Reyes, Julia y Weismeier–Sammer, Daniela. “Capturing the Familiness of Family Businesses: Development of the Family Influence Familiness Scale (FIFS)”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 41, n.° 5, 2017, pp. 709-742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12229. Frank, Hermann; Kessler, Alexander; Bachner, Christine; Fuetsch, Elena y Suess-Reyes, Julia. “Principles for innovation management in family firms: An analysis of long-term successful good practices with a practitioner validation of the principles”. Journal of Family Business Management, vol. 9, n.° 3, 2019, pp. 319-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2018-0049. Gallo, Miguel A. “The role of family business and its distinctive characteristic behaviour in industrial activity”. Family Business Review, vol. 8, n.° 2, 1995, pp. 83-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00083.x. Gallo, Miguel A. y Sveen, Jannicke. “Internationalizing the family business: Facilitating and restraining factors”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 4, 1991, pp. 181-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00181.x. Gersick, Kelin; Davis, John A., Mccollom Hampton, Marion y Lansberg, Ivan. Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business. Harvard Business School Press, 1997. Gómez-Mejía, Luis R.; Haynes, Katalin T.; Nuñez-Nickel, Manuel; Jacobson, Kathyrn J. L. y Moyano-Fuentes, José. “Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-Controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills”. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 1, n.° 52, 2007, pp. 106-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106. Habbershon, Timothy G. y Williams, Mary L. “A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms”. Family Business Review, vol. 12, n.° 1, 1999, pp. 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x. Habbershon, Timothy G.; Williams, Mary L. y MacMillan, Ian. “A Unified Systems Perspective of Family Firm Performance”. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, n.° 4, 2003, pp. 451-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00053-3. Kellermanns, Franz W. y Eddleston, Kimberly A. “A family perspective on when conflict benefits family firm’s performance”. Journal of Business Research, vol. 60, n.° 10, 2007, pp. 1048-1057. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.018. König, Andreas; Kammerlander, Nadine y Enders, Albrecht. “The family innovator’s dilemma: how family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms”. Academy of Management Review, vol. 3, n.° 38, 2013, pp. 418-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0162. Lansberg, Ivan S.; Perrow, Edith L. y Rogolsky, Sharon. “Family business as an emerging field”. Family Business Review, vol. 1, n.° 1, 1988, pp. 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00001.x. Levin, Richard C.; Klervorick, Alvin K.; Nelson, Richard y Winter, Sidney. “Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development”. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 18, n.° 3, 1987, pp. 783-831. Litz, Reginald A. “The family business: Toward definitional clarity”. Family Business Review, vol. 8, n.° 2, 1995, pp. 71-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00071.x. López Fernández, María C.; Serrano Bedia, Ana M.; Gómez López, Raquel y García Piqueres, Gema. “El efecto del familiness en la performance innovadora de las empresas familiares: un análisis exploratorio”. Revista de Empresa Familiar, vol. 2, n.° 2, 2012, pp. 7-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v2i2.4026. Loschky, Alexander. Reviewing the Nomenclature for High-Technology Trade. The Sectoral Approach. OCDE, Statistics Directorate, STD/SES/WPTGS (9), París, 2010. Disponible en: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC57117/reviewing%20the%20nomenclature%20for%20hightechnology%20-%202010%20edition.pdf. Manzaneque, Montserrat; Diéguez-Soto, Julio y Garrido-Moreno, Aurora. “Technological innovation inputs, outputs, and family management: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms”. Innovation: Organization y Management, vol. 20, n.° 4, 2018, pp. 299-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2018.1444491. Meroño-Cerdán, Ángel L.; López-Nicolás, Carolina y Molina-Castillo, Francisco. J. “Risk aversion, innovation, and performance in family firms”. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 27, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 189-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1325569. Milesi, Darío; Petelski, Natalia y Verre, Vladimiro. “Innovation and appropriation mechanisms: Evidence from Argentine microdata”. Technovation, vol. 33, n.° 1-2, 2013, pp. 78-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.12.001. Milesi, Darío; Petelski, Natalia y Verre, Vladimiro. “Apropiación privada de los resultados de innovación”. En: G. Yoguel, V. Robert y F. Barletta (comps.). Tópicos de la teoría evolucionista neoshumpeteriana de la innovación y el cambio tecnológico, vol. 1, pp. 357-376, Argentina: UNGS, 2014. Minichilli, Alessandro; Corbetta, Guido y MacMillan, Ian. “Top Management Teams in Family-Controlled Companies: ‘Familiness’, ‘Faultlines’, and Their Impact on Financial Performance”. Journal of Management Studies, Special Issue: The Family and Enterprise: Unpacking the Connections, vol. 47, n.° 2, 2010, pp. 205–222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00888.x. Neubauer, Fred y Lank, Alden G. La empresa familiar: cómo dirigirla para que perdure. Bilbao: Deusto, 1999. Peña-López, José A. y Sánchez-Santos, José M. (2011). El capital social como recurso de la empresa familiar: la familiness. La Coruña, España: Netbiblo, 2011. Poza, Ernesto J. Empresas familiares, 3a ed. Boston, Estados Unidos: Cengage Learning Editores S.A. de C.V., 2011. Press, Eduardo. Empresas de familia: del conflicto a la eficiencia. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Granica, 2011. Rondi, Emanuela; De Massis, Alfredo y Kotlar, Josip. “Unlocking innovation potential: A typology of family business innovation postures and the critical role of the family system”. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 4, n.° 4, 2019. DOI: 10. 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.12.001. Rosenblatt, Paul C.; De Mik, Leni; Anderson, Roxanne M. y Johnson, Patricia A. The family in business: Understanding and dealing with the challenge’s entrepreneurial families face. San Francisco, EE. UU.: Jossey Bass Business & Management Series, 1985. Shanker, Melissa C. y Astrachan, Joseph H. “Myths and realities: family businesses’ contribution to the US economy, a framework for assessing family business statistics”. Family Business Review, vol. 2, n.° 9, 1996, pp. 107-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00107.x. Siebels, Jan‐Folke y Knyphausen-Aufseβ, Dodo zu. 2012. “A Review of Theory in Family Business Research: The Implications for Corporate Governance”. International Journal of Management Reviews, n.° 14, 2012, pp. 280-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00317.x. Sirmon, David G. y Hitt, Michael A. “Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management and Wealth Creation in Family Firms”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 27, n.° 4, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00013. Staniewski, Marcin y Awruk, Katarzyna. “Systems Approach to Entrepreneurial Success: The Theoretical Discussion on the Significance of Family Factors for Effective Entrepreneurship”. En: Ana Tur Porcar y Domingo Ribeiro Soriano (eds.). Inside the Mind of the Entrepreneur. Cognition, Personality Traits, Intention, and Gender Behavior, pp. 163-174. Springer, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62455-6_12. Stern, Milton H. Inside the Family Held Business: A practical guide for ntrepreneurs and Their Advisors. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1986. Teece, David J. “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy”. Research Policy, vol. 15, n.° 6, 1986, pp. 285-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2. Vélez-Montes, Diego; Holguín-Lagos, Harry; De La Hoz-Pinzón, Gerardo A.; Durán-Bobadilla, Yazmín y Gutiérrez-Ayala, Irma. Dinámica de la empresa familiar pyme: estudio exploratorio en Colombia. Bogotá: Fundación para el Desarrollo Sostenible, 2008. Ward, John L. Keeping the Family Business Healthy: How to Plan for Continuing Growth, Profitability, and Family Leadership. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1987 (2011, impreso). Ward, John y Dolan, Christina. “Defining and describing family business ownership configurations”. Family Business Review, vol. 11, n.° 4, 1998, pp. 305-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00305.x. Zahra, Shaker A. “Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms”. Family Business Review, vol. 18, n.° 1, 2005, pp. 23-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00028.x. Zahra, Shaker A. “Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms: The Wellspring of the Regenerative Capability”. Family Business Review, vol. 31, n.° 2, 2018, pp. 216-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518776871. |
type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
type_content |
Text |
publishDate |
2022-06-15 |
date_accessioned |
2022-06-15T11:59:03Z |
date_available |
2022-06-15T11:59:03Z |
url |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/7885 |
url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n33.08 |
issn |
1657-1959 |
eissn |
2346-2116 |
doi |
10.18601/16571959.n33.08 |
citationstartpage |
205 |
citationendpage |
240 |
url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7885/12513 |
url3_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7885/12514 |
_version_ |
1811199522430255104 |