Titulo:

Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption
.

Sumario:

La Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción de 1996 fue el primer tratado firmado para combatir la corrupción en el ámbito transnacional. La Convención fue adoptada debido al creciente interés de la Organización de los Estados Americanos en proteger la democracia en la región, particularmente en relación con la corrupción y otros vicios de los gobiernos electos. En ese sentido, la Convención promueve la convergencia de los marcos nacionales anticorrupción y la cooperación internacional en casos de corrupción transna­cional. Para mejorar su eficacia, en 2001, la Organización creó un Mecanismo de Seguimiento basado en la cooperación técnica y consensuada. En 2016 se dio un paso más con la creación de la Misión de Apoyo a la Lucha contra... Ver más

Guardado en:

0122-9893

2346-2051

2024-04-29

261

290

José Ignacio Hernández G. - 2024

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id metarevistapublica_uexternado_revistaderechodelestado_81_article_9397
record_format ojs
spelling Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption
Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption
La Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción de 1996 fue el primer tratado firmado para combatir la corrupción en el ámbito transnacional. La Convención fue adoptada debido al creciente interés de la Organización de los Estados Americanos en proteger la democracia en la región, particularmente en relación con la corrupción y otros vicios de los gobiernos electos. En ese sentido, la Convención promueve la convergencia de los marcos nacionales anticorrupción y la cooperación internacional en casos de corrupción transna­cional. Para mejorar su eficacia, en 2001, la Organización creó un Mecanismo de Seguimiento basado en la cooperación técnica y consensuada. En 2016 se dio un paso más con la creación de la Misión de Apoyo a la Lucha contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras, la cual fue terminada en 2020 por el Gobierno de Honduras para proteger la soberanía nacional. La Convención demuestra que la mayor debilidad de las respuestas supranacionales a la co­rrupción es la falta de mecanismos internacionales de aplicación. Para hacer frente a esa situación, la Organización de los Estados Americanos ha creado instrumentos flexibles para supervisar el cumplimiento de la Convención basados en la cooperación y colaboración de los Estados. Sin embargo, la defensa de la soberanía nacional (debido al principio de no intervención) y la fragilidad del Estado para implementar políticas anticorrupción han creado nuevos desafíos.
The 1996 Inter-American Convention Against Corruption was the first treaty signed to tackle corruption at a transnational level. The Convention was ad­opted due to the increasing interest of the Organization of American States to protect democracy in the region, particularly against corruption and other vices of elected Governments. In that sense, the Convention promotes the conver­gence of national anti-corruption frameworks and international cooperation in transnational corruption cases. To improve its effectiveness, in 2001, the Organization created a Follow-up Mechanism based on consensual and techni­cal cooperation. In 2016, a further step was adopted with the creation of the Mission to Support the Fight Against Corruption and Impunity in Honduras, which was terminated in 2020 by the Honduran Government to protect na­tional sovereignty. The Convention demonstrates that the greatest weakness of supranational responses to corruption is the lack of international enforcement mechanisms. To address this situation, the Organization of American States has created flexible instruments to supervise the fulfillment of the Convention based on the cooperation and collaboration of the states. However, the defense of national sovereignty (due to the non-intervention principle) and the State’s fragility to implement anti-corruption policies have created further challenges.
Hernández G., José Ignacio
Inter-American Convention Against Corruption,
Follow-up Mechanism for implementing the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption,
Mission to Support the Fight against Corruption and Impunity in Honduras,
transnational corruption,
global law
Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción,
Mecanismo de Seguimiento de la Implementación de la Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción,
Misión de Apoyo contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras,
corrupción transnacional,
derecho global
59
Núm. 59 , Año 2024 : Mayo - Agosto
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2024-04-29T11:53:04Z
2024-04-29T11:53:04Z
2024-04-29
application/pdf
text/html
Departamento de Derecho Constitucional
Revista Derecho del Estado
0122-9893
2346-2051
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/9397
10.18601/01229893.n59.09
https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n59.09
spa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
José Ignacio Hernández G. - 2024
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
261
290
Altamirano, G. “The Impact of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption”, in University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 38-3, 2006-2007, 487-547.
Aguiar, A. El derecho a la democracia, Caracas, Editorial Jurídica Venezolana, 2008.
Aman, A. Administrative Law in a Global Era, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1992.
Andrade Viera, S. “Institucionalización de políticas anticorrupción a través del apoyo de misiones internacionales”, in Opera, 30, 2022.
Andrews, M. The limits of institutional reforms in development, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Boister, N. An Introduction to Transnational Criminal Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018.
Borlini, L., and Arnone, M. Corruption: Economic Analysis and International Law, Northampton, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014.
Brewer, A.R. Sobre la democracia, Editorial Jurídica Venezolana, Caracas, 2019.
Brinks, D., Levitskly, S., and Murillo, V., Understanding Institutional Weakness. Power and design in Latin American institutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019.
Cassese, S. The Global Polity, Sevilla: Global Law Press, 2012.
Cassese, S. Advanced Introduction to Global Administrative Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2021.
Chaikin, D, and Sharman, J. Corruption and Money Laundering: A Symbiotic Relationship, New York, Palgrave Macmillan US, 2009.
Chayes, S. Thieves of State: Why Corruption Threatens Global Security, New York, W. W. Norton & Company, 2015.
Cooley, A. et al. “The Rise of Kleptocracy: Laundering Cash, Whitewashing Reputations”, in Journal of Democracy, 29(1), 2018
Coralie P, and Jon V. Global Corruption Barometer. Latin America and the Caribbean 2019. Citizens’ view and experience of corruption, International Transparency, 2019.
Corrales, J. “Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela”, in Journal of Democracy, 26(2), 2015.
Davis, K. E. Between Impunity and Imperialism: the Regulation of Transnational Bribery, New York, Oxford University Press, 2019.
Michele, R. “The Follow-up Mechanism of the Inter-American Convention Against Corrup¬tion: a Preliminary Assessment: Is the Glass Half Empty?”, in Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas, 10-2, 2004.
Engel, E. et al. Informe del Grupo Asesor de Expertos en anticorrupción, transparencia e integridad para América Latina y el Caribe, Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Washington, D.C., 2018.
Feingeblatt, H. (ed.). Los costos sociales de la corrupción, Tegucigalpa, maccih, 2019.
Ferrajoli, L. Democracia y garantismo, Madrid, Trotta, 2018.
Florencia Tort, C. “The search for synergies: the utopian ideal of cooperation between international anti-corruption mechanisms”, in Bismuth, R. et al. (ed.). The Trasnationalization of Anti-Corruption Law, New York, Routledge, 2021.
Fukuyama, F. Political Order and Political Decay, New York, Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2014.
Hernández G., J.I., “The Limits of the Rule of Law to Address Systemic Corruption”, November 4, 2021, at https://www.corruptionjusticeandlegitimacy.org/post/the-limits-of-the-rule-of-law-to-address-systemic-corruption.
Hernández, J.I. La pandemia de la covid-19 y el Derecho Administrativo en América Latina, Tirant lo Blanch-Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá.
Haugaard, M. “Kleptocracy, Authoritarianism and Democracy as Ideal Types of Political Power”, in Journal of Political Power ahead-of-print 2023.
Huerta, C. “Los estándares del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos en el fortalecimiento del Estado de derecho y la transformación de la legislación administrativa en México”, in Von Bogdandy, A. et al., La interamericanización del Derecho Administrativo en América Latina, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law-Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales del Estado de Querétaro, Querétaro, 2022.
Hirschfeld, K. Gangster States: Organized Crime, Kleptocracy, and Political Collapse, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
Inter-American Comission on Human Rights, Corrupción y Derechos Humanos, Washington D.C., 2019.
Jessup, P. “The Estrada doctrine”, in American Journal of International Law 25, 1931.
Johnsøn, J. Anti-Corruption Strategies in Fragile States: Theory and Practice in Aid Agen¬cies, Northampton, Edward Elgar, 2016.
Kingsbury, B. et al. “Global Administrative Law and Deliberative Democracy”, in The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016.
Luján, M. “Algunos aspectos de la lucha contra la corrupción en el ámbito interamericano”, in Agenda Internacional 11-22, 2005.
Mazzuca, S.. Latecomer State Formation: Political Geography and Capacity Failure in Latin America, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2021.
Morales, M. “Aproximación a los estándares interamericanos sobre corrupción, institucionalidad democrática y derechos humanos”, in Impacto de la corrupción en los derechos humanos, Querétaro, Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales del Estado de Querétaro, 2018.
Pasculli, L., and R., N. “The global anti-corruption framework”, in Ryder, N. et al. (ed.). Corruption, Integrity, and the Law: Global Regulatory Challenges, New York, Law of Routledge, 2020.
Risse, T. “Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood”, in Risse, T. et al., The Oxford Handbook of Governance, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019.
Rose-Ackerman, S. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Rose-Ackerman, S. “Trust, honesty, and corruption: reflection on the state-building process”, in Archives Européennes de Sociologie. European Journal of Sociology, 42(3), 2001.
Rose, C. International Anti-Corruption Norms, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015.
Rotberg, R. “Repressive, Aggressive and Rogue Nation-States”, in Rotberg, R. (ed.). Worst of the Worst. Dealing with Repressive and Rogue Nations, Cambridge. World Peace Foundation and Brookings Institution Press, 2017.
Rotberg, R. The Corruption Cure: How Citizens and Leaders Can Combat Graft, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2017.
Scharbatke-Church, C., and Chigas, D. Understanding Social Norms. A Reference Guide for Policy and Practice, The Fletcher School, 2019.
Shea, D. R. The Calvo clause, Minneapolis, The University of Minnesota Press, 1955.
Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2023, Berlin, 2023.
Tushnet, M. “Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Some Conceptual Issues”, in Ginsburg, T. and Simpser, A. (ed.), Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Urosa, D. and Hernández G., J.I., “La Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y el Derecho procesal convencional. Un estudio del Derecho Procesal Público Global”, in Brewer-Carías, A. and Ayala, C. (ed.). Libro homenaje al Dr. Pedro Nikken, vol. i, Caracas: Academia de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 2021.
Wabwile, N. “Transnational Corruption, Violations of Human Rights and States’ Extraterritorial Responsibility: A Case for International Action Strategies”, in African Journal of Legal Studies, 8(1-2), 2015.
Webb, P. “The United Nations Convention Against Corruption-Global achievement or missed opportunity?”, in Journal of International Economic Law, 8(1), 2005.
Wolf, M. “The World Needs an International Anti-Corruption Court”, Daedalus 147(3), 2018.
Zagaris, B. International White-Collar Crime, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Zysset, A. “International crimes through the lens of global constitutionalism”, in Global Constitutionalism, 12: 1, 2023.
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/9397/16175
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/9397/16176
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication
institution UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista Derecho del Estado
title Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption
spellingShingle Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption
Hernández G., José Ignacio
Inter-American Convention Against Corruption,
Follow-up Mechanism for implementing the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption,
Mission to Support the Fight against Corruption and Impunity in Honduras,
transnational corruption,
global law
Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción,
Mecanismo de Seguimiento de la Implementación de la Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción,
Misión de Apoyo contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras,
corrupción transnacional,
derecho global
title_short Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption
title_full Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption
title_fullStr Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption
title_full_unstemmed Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption
title_sort fighting corruption in latin america and the caribbean at a supranational level: balances and challenges of the inter-american convention against corruption
title_eng Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption
description La Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción de 1996 fue el primer tratado firmado para combatir la corrupción en el ámbito transnacional. La Convención fue adoptada debido al creciente interés de la Organización de los Estados Americanos en proteger la democracia en la región, particularmente en relación con la corrupción y otros vicios de los gobiernos electos. En ese sentido, la Convención promueve la convergencia de los marcos nacionales anticorrupción y la cooperación internacional en casos de corrupción transna­cional. Para mejorar su eficacia, en 2001, la Organización creó un Mecanismo de Seguimiento basado en la cooperación técnica y consensuada. En 2016 se dio un paso más con la creación de la Misión de Apoyo a la Lucha contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras, la cual fue terminada en 2020 por el Gobierno de Honduras para proteger la soberanía nacional. La Convención demuestra que la mayor debilidad de las respuestas supranacionales a la co­rrupción es la falta de mecanismos internacionales de aplicación. Para hacer frente a esa situación, la Organización de los Estados Americanos ha creado instrumentos flexibles para supervisar el cumplimiento de la Convención basados en la cooperación y colaboración de los Estados. Sin embargo, la defensa de la soberanía nacional (debido al principio de no intervención) y la fragilidad del Estado para implementar políticas anticorrupción han creado nuevos desafíos.
description_eng The 1996 Inter-American Convention Against Corruption was the first treaty signed to tackle corruption at a transnational level. The Convention was ad­opted due to the increasing interest of the Organization of American States to protect democracy in the region, particularly against corruption and other vices of elected Governments. In that sense, the Convention promotes the conver­gence of national anti-corruption frameworks and international cooperation in transnational corruption cases. To improve its effectiveness, in 2001, the Organization created a Follow-up Mechanism based on consensual and techni­cal cooperation. In 2016, a further step was adopted with the creation of the Mission to Support the Fight Against Corruption and Impunity in Honduras, which was terminated in 2020 by the Honduran Government to protect na­tional sovereignty. The Convention demonstrates that the greatest weakness of supranational responses to corruption is the lack of international enforcement mechanisms. To address this situation, the Organization of American States has created flexible instruments to supervise the fulfillment of the Convention based on the cooperation and collaboration of the states. However, the defense of national sovereignty (due to the non-intervention principle) and the State’s fragility to implement anti-corruption policies have created further challenges.
author Hernández G., José Ignacio
author_facet Hernández G., José Ignacio
topic Inter-American Convention Against Corruption,
Follow-up Mechanism for implementing the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption,
Mission to Support the Fight against Corruption and Impunity in Honduras,
transnational corruption,
global law
Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción,
Mecanismo de Seguimiento de la Implementación de la Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción,
Misión de Apoyo contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras,
corrupción transnacional,
derecho global
topic_facet Inter-American Convention Against Corruption,
Follow-up Mechanism for implementing the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption,
Mission to Support the Fight against Corruption and Impunity in Honduras,
transnational corruption,
global law
Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción,
Mecanismo de Seguimiento de la Implementación de la Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción,
Misión de Apoyo contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras,
corrupción transnacional,
derecho global
topicspa_str_mv Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción,
Mecanismo de Seguimiento de la Implementación de la Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción,
Misión de Apoyo contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras,
corrupción transnacional,
derecho global
citationissue 59
citationedition Núm. 59 , Año 2024 : Mayo - Agosto
publisher Departamento de Derecho Constitucional
ispartofjournal Revista Derecho del Estado
source https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/9397
language spa
format Article
rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
José Ignacio Hernández G. - 2024
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references Altamirano, G. “The Impact of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption”, in University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 38-3, 2006-2007, 487-547.
Aguiar, A. El derecho a la democracia, Caracas, Editorial Jurídica Venezolana, 2008.
Aman, A. Administrative Law in a Global Era, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1992.
Andrade Viera, S. “Institucionalización de políticas anticorrupción a través del apoyo de misiones internacionales”, in Opera, 30, 2022.
Andrews, M. The limits of institutional reforms in development, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Boister, N. An Introduction to Transnational Criminal Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018.
Borlini, L., and Arnone, M. Corruption: Economic Analysis and International Law, Northampton, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014.
Brewer, A.R. Sobre la democracia, Editorial Jurídica Venezolana, Caracas, 2019.
Brinks, D., Levitskly, S., and Murillo, V., Understanding Institutional Weakness. Power and design in Latin American institutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019.
Cassese, S. The Global Polity, Sevilla: Global Law Press, 2012.
Cassese, S. Advanced Introduction to Global Administrative Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2021.
Chaikin, D, and Sharman, J. Corruption and Money Laundering: A Symbiotic Relationship, New York, Palgrave Macmillan US, 2009.
Chayes, S. Thieves of State: Why Corruption Threatens Global Security, New York, W. W. Norton & Company, 2015.
Cooley, A. et al. “The Rise of Kleptocracy: Laundering Cash, Whitewashing Reputations”, in Journal of Democracy, 29(1), 2018
Coralie P, and Jon V. Global Corruption Barometer. Latin America and the Caribbean 2019. Citizens’ view and experience of corruption, International Transparency, 2019.
Corrales, J. “Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela”, in Journal of Democracy, 26(2), 2015.
Davis, K. E. Between Impunity and Imperialism: the Regulation of Transnational Bribery, New York, Oxford University Press, 2019.
Michele, R. “The Follow-up Mechanism of the Inter-American Convention Against Corrup¬tion: a Preliminary Assessment: Is the Glass Half Empty?”, in Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas, 10-2, 2004.
Engel, E. et al. Informe del Grupo Asesor de Expertos en anticorrupción, transparencia e integridad para América Latina y el Caribe, Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Washington, D.C., 2018.
Feingeblatt, H. (ed.). Los costos sociales de la corrupción, Tegucigalpa, maccih, 2019.
Ferrajoli, L. Democracia y garantismo, Madrid, Trotta, 2018.
Florencia Tort, C. “The search for synergies: the utopian ideal of cooperation between international anti-corruption mechanisms”, in Bismuth, R. et al. (ed.). The Trasnationalization of Anti-Corruption Law, New York, Routledge, 2021.
Fukuyama, F. Political Order and Political Decay, New York, Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2014.
Hernández G., J.I., “The Limits of the Rule of Law to Address Systemic Corruption”, November 4, 2021, at https://www.corruptionjusticeandlegitimacy.org/post/the-limits-of-the-rule-of-law-to-address-systemic-corruption.
Hernández, J.I. La pandemia de la covid-19 y el Derecho Administrativo en América Latina, Tirant lo Blanch-Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá.
Haugaard, M. “Kleptocracy, Authoritarianism and Democracy as Ideal Types of Political Power”, in Journal of Political Power ahead-of-print 2023.
Huerta, C. “Los estándares del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos en el fortalecimiento del Estado de derecho y la transformación de la legislación administrativa en México”, in Von Bogdandy, A. et al., La interamericanización del Derecho Administrativo en América Latina, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law-Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales del Estado de Querétaro, Querétaro, 2022.
Hirschfeld, K. Gangster States: Organized Crime, Kleptocracy, and Political Collapse, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
Inter-American Comission on Human Rights, Corrupción y Derechos Humanos, Washington D.C., 2019.
Jessup, P. “The Estrada doctrine”, in American Journal of International Law 25, 1931.
Johnsøn, J. Anti-Corruption Strategies in Fragile States: Theory and Practice in Aid Agen¬cies, Northampton, Edward Elgar, 2016.
Kingsbury, B. et al. “Global Administrative Law and Deliberative Democracy”, in The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016.
Luján, M. “Algunos aspectos de la lucha contra la corrupción en el ámbito interamericano”, in Agenda Internacional 11-22, 2005.
Mazzuca, S.. Latecomer State Formation: Political Geography and Capacity Failure in Latin America, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2021.
Morales, M. “Aproximación a los estándares interamericanos sobre corrupción, institucionalidad democrática y derechos humanos”, in Impacto de la corrupción en los derechos humanos, Querétaro, Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales del Estado de Querétaro, 2018.
Pasculli, L., and R., N. “The global anti-corruption framework”, in Ryder, N. et al. (ed.). Corruption, Integrity, and the Law: Global Regulatory Challenges, New York, Law of Routledge, 2020.
Risse, T. “Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood”, in Risse, T. et al., The Oxford Handbook of Governance, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019.
Rose-Ackerman, S. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Rose-Ackerman, S. “Trust, honesty, and corruption: reflection on the state-building process”, in Archives Européennes de Sociologie. European Journal of Sociology, 42(3), 2001.
Rose, C. International Anti-Corruption Norms, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015.
Rotberg, R. “Repressive, Aggressive and Rogue Nation-States”, in Rotberg, R. (ed.). Worst of the Worst. Dealing with Repressive and Rogue Nations, Cambridge. World Peace Foundation and Brookings Institution Press, 2017.
Rotberg, R. The Corruption Cure: How Citizens and Leaders Can Combat Graft, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2017.
Scharbatke-Church, C., and Chigas, D. Understanding Social Norms. A Reference Guide for Policy and Practice, The Fletcher School, 2019.
Shea, D. R. The Calvo clause, Minneapolis, The University of Minnesota Press, 1955.
Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2023, Berlin, 2023.
Tushnet, M. “Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Some Conceptual Issues”, in Ginsburg, T. and Simpser, A. (ed.), Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Urosa, D. and Hernández G., J.I., “La Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y el Derecho procesal convencional. Un estudio del Derecho Procesal Público Global”, in Brewer-Carías, A. and Ayala, C. (ed.). Libro homenaje al Dr. Pedro Nikken, vol. i, Caracas: Academia de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 2021.
Wabwile, N. “Transnational Corruption, Violations of Human Rights and States’ Extraterritorial Responsibility: A Case for International Action Strategies”, in African Journal of Legal Studies, 8(1-2), 2015.
Webb, P. “The United Nations Convention Against Corruption-Global achievement or missed opportunity?”, in Journal of International Economic Law, 8(1), 2005.
Wolf, M. “The World Needs an International Anti-Corruption Court”, Daedalus 147(3), 2018.
Zagaris, B. International White-Collar Crime, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Zysset, A. “International crimes through the lens of global constitutionalism”, in Global Constitutionalism, 12: 1, 2023.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2024-04-29
date_accessioned 2024-04-29T11:53:04Z
date_available 2024-04-29T11:53:04Z
url https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/9397
url_doi https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n59.09
issn 0122-9893
eissn 2346-2051
doi 10.18601/01229893.n59.09
citationstartpage 261
citationendpage 290
url2_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/9397/16175
url3_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/9397/16176
_version_ 1811199927215194112