Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption
.
La Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción de 1996 fue el primer tratado firmado para combatir la corrupción en el ámbito transnacional. La Convención fue adoptada debido al creciente interés de la Organización de los Estados Americanos en proteger la democracia en la región, particularmente en relación con la corrupción y otros vicios de los gobiernos electos. En ese sentido, la Convención promueve la convergencia de los marcos nacionales anticorrupción y la cooperación internacional en casos de corrupción transnacional. Para mejorar su eficacia, en 2001, la Organización creó un Mecanismo de Seguimiento basado en la cooperación técnica y consensuada. En 2016 se dio un paso más con la creación de la Misión de Apoyo a la Lucha contra... Ver más
0122-9893
2346-2051
2024-04-29
261
290
José Ignacio Hernández G. - 2024
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id |
metarevistapublica_uexternado_revistaderechodelestado_81_article_9397 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption La Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción de 1996 fue el primer tratado firmado para combatir la corrupción en el ámbito transnacional. La Convención fue adoptada debido al creciente interés de la Organización de los Estados Americanos en proteger la democracia en la región, particularmente en relación con la corrupción y otros vicios de los gobiernos electos. En ese sentido, la Convención promueve la convergencia de los marcos nacionales anticorrupción y la cooperación internacional en casos de corrupción transnacional. Para mejorar su eficacia, en 2001, la Organización creó un Mecanismo de Seguimiento basado en la cooperación técnica y consensuada. En 2016 se dio un paso más con la creación de la Misión de Apoyo a la Lucha contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras, la cual fue terminada en 2020 por el Gobierno de Honduras para proteger la soberanía nacional. La Convención demuestra que la mayor debilidad de las respuestas supranacionales a la corrupción es la falta de mecanismos internacionales de aplicación. Para hacer frente a esa situación, la Organización de los Estados Americanos ha creado instrumentos flexibles para supervisar el cumplimiento de la Convención basados en la cooperación y colaboración de los Estados. Sin embargo, la defensa de la soberanía nacional (debido al principio de no intervención) y la fragilidad del Estado para implementar políticas anticorrupción han creado nuevos desafíos. The 1996 Inter-American Convention Against Corruption was the first treaty signed to tackle corruption at a transnational level. The Convention was adopted due to the increasing interest of the Organization of American States to protect democracy in the region, particularly against corruption and other vices of elected Governments. In that sense, the Convention promotes the convergence of national anti-corruption frameworks and international cooperation in transnational corruption cases. To improve its effectiveness, in 2001, the Organization created a Follow-up Mechanism based on consensual and technical cooperation. In 2016, a further step was adopted with the creation of the Mission to Support the Fight Against Corruption and Impunity in Honduras, which was terminated in 2020 by the Honduran Government to protect national sovereignty. The Convention demonstrates that the greatest weakness of supranational responses to corruption is the lack of international enforcement mechanisms. To address this situation, the Organization of American States has created flexible instruments to supervise the fulfillment of the Convention based on the cooperation and collaboration of the states. However, the defense of national sovereignty (due to the non-intervention principle) and the State’s fragility to implement anti-corruption policies have created further challenges. Hernández G., José Ignacio Inter-American Convention Against Corruption, Follow-up Mechanism for implementing the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption, Mission to Support the Fight against Corruption and Impunity in Honduras, transnational corruption, global law Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción, Mecanismo de Seguimiento de la Implementación de la Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción, Misión de Apoyo contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras, corrupción transnacional, derecho global 59 Núm. 59 , Año 2024 : Mayo - Agosto Artículo de revista Journal article 2024-04-29T11:53:04Z 2024-04-29T11:53:04Z 2024-04-29 application/pdf text/html Departamento de Derecho Constitucional Revista Derecho del Estado 0122-9893 2346-2051 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/9397 10.18601/01229893.n59.09 https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n59.09 spa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 José Ignacio Hernández G. - 2024 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. 261 290 Altamirano, G. “The Impact of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption”, in University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 38-3, 2006-2007, 487-547. Aguiar, A. El derecho a la democracia, Caracas, Editorial Jurídica Venezolana, 2008. Aman, A. Administrative Law in a Global Era, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1992. Andrade Viera, S. “Institucionalización de políticas anticorrupción a través del apoyo de misiones internacionales”, in Opera, 30, 2022. Andrews, M. The limits of institutional reforms in development, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2017. Boister, N. An Introduction to Transnational Criminal Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018. Borlini, L., and Arnone, M. Corruption: Economic Analysis and International Law, Northampton, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014. Brewer, A.R. Sobre la democracia, Editorial Jurídica Venezolana, Caracas, 2019. Brinks, D., Levitskly, S., and Murillo, V., Understanding Institutional Weakness. Power and design in Latin American institutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019. Cassese, S. The Global Polity, Sevilla: Global Law Press, 2012. Cassese, S. Advanced Introduction to Global Administrative Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2021. Chaikin, D, and Sharman, J. Corruption and Money Laundering: A Symbiotic Relationship, New York, Palgrave Macmillan US, 2009. Chayes, S. Thieves of State: Why Corruption Threatens Global Security, New York, W. W. Norton & Company, 2015. Cooley, A. et al. “The Rise of Kleptocracy: Laundering Cash, Whitewashing Reputations”, in Journal of Democracy, 29(1), 2018 Coralie P, and Jon V. Global Corruption Barometer. Latin America and the Caribbean 2019. Citizens’ view and experience of corruption, International Transparency, 2019. Corrales, J. “Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela”, in Journal of Democracy, 26(2), 2015. Davis, K. E. Between Impunity and Imperialism: the Regulation of Transnational Bribery, New York, Oxford University Press, 2019. Michele, R. “The Follow-up Mechanism of the Inter-American Convention Against Corrup¬tion: a Preliminary Assessment: Is the Glass Half Empty?”, in Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas, 10-2, 2004. Engel, E. et al. Informe del Grupo Asesor de Expertos en anticorrupción, transparencia e integridad para América Latina y el Caribe, Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Washington, D.C., 2018. Feingeblatt, H. (ed.). Los costos sociales de la corrupción, Tegucigalpa, maccih, 2019. Ferrajoli, L. Democracia y garantismo, Madrid, Trotta, 2018. Florencia Tort, C. “The search for synergies: the utopian ideal of cooperation between international anti-corruption mechanisms”, in Bismuth, R. et al. (ed.). The Trasnationalization of Anti-Corruption Law, New York, Routledge, 2021. Fukuyama, F. Political Order and Political Decay, New York, Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2014. Hernández G., J.I., “The Limits of the Rule of Law to Address Systemic Corruption”, November 4, 2021, at https://www.corruptionjusticeandlegitimacy.org/post/the-limits-of-the-rule-of-law-to-address-systemic-corruption. Hernández, J.I. La pandemia de la covid-19 y el Derecho Administrativo en América Latina, Tirant lo Blanch-Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá. Haugaard, M. “Kleptocracy, Authoritarianism and Democracy as Ideal Types of Political Power”, in Journal of Political Power ahead-of-print 2023. Huerta, C. “Los estándares del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos en el fortalecimiento del Estado de derecho y la transformación de la legislación administrativa en México”, in Von Bogdandy, A. et al., La interamericanización del Derecho Administrativo en América Latina, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law-Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales del Estado de Querétaro, Querétaro, 2022. Hirschfeld, K. Gangster States: Organized Crime, Kleptocracy, and Political Collapse, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. Inter-American Comission on Human Rights, Corrupción y Derechos Humanos, Washington D.C., 2019. Jessup, P. “The Estrada doctrine”, in American Journal of International Law 25, 1931. Johnsøn, J. Anti-Corruption Strategies in Fragile States: Theory and Practice in Aid Agen¬cies, Northampton, Edward Elgar, 2016. Kingsbury, B. et al. “Global Administrative Law and Deliberative Democracy”, in The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016. Luján, M. “Algunos aspectos de la lucha contra la corrupción en el ámbito interamericano”, in Agenda Internacional 11-22, 2005. Mazzuca, S.. Latecomer State Formation: Political Geography and Capacity Failure in Latin America, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2021. Morales, M. “Aproximación a los estándares interamericanos sobre corrupción, institucionalidad democrática y derechos humanos”, in Impacto de la corrupción en los derechos humanos, Querétaro, Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales del Estado de Querétaro, 2018. Pasculli, L., and R., N. “The global anti-corruption framework”, in Ryder, N. et al. (ed.). Corruption, Integrity, and the Law: Global Regulatory Challenges, New York, Law of Routledge, 2020. Risse, T. “Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood”, in Risse, T. et al., The Oxford Handbook of Governance, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019. Rose-Ackerman, S. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1999. Rose-Ackerman, S. “Trust, honesty, and corruption: reflection on the state-building process”, in Archives Européennes de Sociologie. European Journal of Sociology, 42(3), 2001. Rose, C. International Anti-Corruption Norms, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015. Rotberg, R. “Repressive, Aggressive and Rogue Nation-States”, in Rotberg, R. (ed.). Worst of the Worst. Dealing with Repressive and Rogue Nations, Cambridge. World Peace Foundation and Brookings Institution Press, 2017. Rotberg, R. The Corruption Cure: How Citizens and Leaders Can Combat Graft, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2017. Scharbatke-Church, C., and Chigas, D. Understanding Social Norms. A Reference Guide for Policy and Practice, The Fletcher School, 2019. Shea, D. R. The Calvo clause, Minneapolis, The University of Minnesota Press, 1955. Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2023, Berlin, 2023. Tushnet, M. “Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Some Conceptual Issues”, in Ginsburg, T. and Simpser, A. (ed.), Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018. Urosa, D. and Hernández G., J.I., “La Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y el Derecho procesal convencional. Un estudio del Derecho Procesal Público Global”, in Brewer-Carías, A. and Ayala, C. (ed.). Libro homenaje al Dr. Pedro Nikken, vol. i, Caracas: Academia de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 2021. Wabwile, N. “Transnational Corruption, Violations of Human Rights and States’ Extraterritorial Responsibility: A Case for International Action Strategies”, in African Journal of Legal Studies, 8(1-2), 2015. Webb, P. “The United Nations Convention Against Corruption-Global achievement or missed opportunity?”, in Journal of International Economic Law, 8(1), 2005. Wolf, M. “The World Needs an International Anti-Corruption Court”, Daedalus 147(3), 2018. Zagaris, B. International White-Collar Crime, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 2010. Zysset, A. “International crimes through the lens of global constitutionalism”, in Global Constitutionalism, 12: 1, 2023. https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/9397/16175 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/9397/16176 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |
institution |
UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA |
thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
country_str |
Colombia |
collection |
Revista Derecho del Estado |
title |
Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption |
spellingShingle |
Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption Hernández G., José Ignacio Inter-American Convention Against Corruption, Follow-up Mechanism for implementing the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption, Mission to Support the Fight against Corruption and Impunity in Honduras, transnational corruption, global law Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción, Mecanismo de Seguimiento de la Implementación de la Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción, Misión de Apoyo contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras, corrupción transnacional, derecho global |
title_short |
Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption |
title_full |
Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption |
title_fullStr |
Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption |
title_sort |
fighting corruption in latin america and the caribbean at a supranational level: balances and challenges of the inter-american convention against corruption |
title_eng |
Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption |
description |
La Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción de 1996 fue el primer tratado firmado para combatir la corrupción en el ámbito transnacional. La Convención fue adoptada debido al creciente interés de la Organización de los Estados Americanos en proteger la democracia en la región, particularmente en relación con la corrupción y otros vicios de los gobiernos electos. En ese sentido, la Convención promueve la convergencia de los marcos nacionales anticorrupción y la cooperación internacional en casos de corrupción transnacional. Para mejorar su eficacia, en 2001, la Organización creó un Mecanismo de Seguimiento basado en la cooperación técnica y consensuada. En 2016 se dio un paso más con la creación de la Misión de Apoyo a la Lucha contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras, la cual fue terminada en 2020 por el Gobierno de Honduras para proteger la soberanía nacional. La Convención demuestra que la mayor debilidad de las respuestas supranacionales a la corrupción es la falta de mecanismos internacionales de aplicación. Para hacer frente a esa situación, la Organización de los Estados Americanos ha creado instrumentos flexibles para supervisar el cumplimiento de la Convención basados en la cooperación y colaboración de los Estados. Sin embargo, la defensa de la soberanía nacional (debido al principio de no intervención) y la fragilidad del Estado para implementar políticas anticorrupción han creado nuevos desafíos.
|
description_eng |
The 1996 Inter-American Convention Against Corruption was the first treaty signed to tackle corruption at a transnational level. The Convention was adopted due to the increasing interest of the Organization of American States to protect democracy in the region, particularly against corruption and other vices of elected Governments. In that sense, the Convention promotes the convergence of national anti-corruption frameworks and international cooperation in transnational corruption cases. To improve its effectiveness, in 2001, the Organization created a Follow-up Mechanism based on consensual and technical cooperation. In 2016, a further step was adopted with the creation of the Mission to Support the Fight Against Corruption and Impunity in Honduras, which was terminated in 2020 by the Honduran Government to protect national sovereignty. The Convention demonstrates that the greatest weakness of supranational responses to corruption is the lack of international enforcement mechanisms. To address this situation, the Organization of American States has created flexible instruments to supervise the fulfillment of the Convention based on the cooperation and collaboration of the states. However, the defense of national sovereignty (due to the non-intervention principle) and the State’s fragility to implement anti-corruption policies have created further challenges.
|
author |
Hernández G., José Ignacio |
author_facet |
Hernández G., José Ignacio |
topic |
Inter-American Convention Against Corruption, Follow-up Mechanism for implementing the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption, Mission to Support the Fight against Corruption and Impunity in Honduras, transnational corruption, global law Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción, Mecanismo de Seguimiento de la Implementación de la Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción, Misión de Apoyo contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras, corrupción transnacional, derecho global |
topic_facet |
Inter-American Convention Against Corruption, Follow-up Mechanism for implementing the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption, Mission to Support the Fight against Corruption and Impunity in Honduras, transnational corruption, global law Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción, Mecanismo de Seguimiento de la Implementación de la Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción, Misión de Apoyo contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras, corrupción transnacional, derecho global |
topicspa_str_mv |
Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción, Mecanismo de Seguimiento de la Implementación de la Convención Interamericana Contra la Corrupción, Misión de Apoyo contra la Corrupción y la Impunidad en Honduras, corrupción transnacional, derecho global |
citationissue |
59 |
citationedition |
Núm. 59 , Año 2024 : Mayo - Agosto |
publisher |
Departamento de Derecho Constitucional |
ispartofjournal |
Revista Derecho del Estado |
source |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/9397 |
language |
spa |
format |
Article |
rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 José Ignacio Hernández G. - 2024 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
references |
Altamirano, G. “The Impact of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption”, in University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 38-3, 2006-2007, 487-547. Aguiar, A. El derecho a la democracia, Caracas, Editorial Jurídica Venezolana, 2008. Aman, A. Administrative Law in a Global Era, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1992. Andrade Viera, S. “Institucionalización de políticas anticorrupción a través del apoyo de misiones internacionales”, in Opera, 30, 2022. Andrews, M. The limits of institutional reforms in development, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2017. Boister, N. An Introduction to Transnational Criminal Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018. Borlini, L., and Arnone, M. Corruption: Economic Analysis and International Law, Northampton, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014. Brewer, A.R. Sobre la democracia, Editorial Jurídica Venezolana, Caracas, 2019. Brinks, D., Levitskly, S., and Murillo, V., Understanding Institutional Weakness. Power and design in Latin American institutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019. Cassese, S. The Global Polity, Sevilla: Global Law Press, 2012. Cassese, S. Advanced Introduction to Global Administrative Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2021. Chaikin, D, and Sharman, J. Corruption and Money Laundering: A Symbiotic Relationship, New York, Palgrave Macmillan US, 2009. Chayes, S. Thieves of State: Why Corruption Threatens Global Security, New York, W. W. Norton & Company, 2015. Cooley, A. et al. “The Rise of Kleptocracy: Laundering Cash, Whitewashing Reputations”, in Journal of Democracy, 29(1), 2018 Coralie P, and Jon V. Global Corruption Barometer. Latin America and the Caribbean 2019. Citizens’ view and experience of corruption, International Transparency, 2019. Corrales, J. “Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela”, in Journal of Democracy, 26(2), 2015. Davis, K. E. Between Impunity and Imperialism: the Regulation of Transnational Bribery, New York, Oxford University Press, 2019. Michele, R. “The Follow-up Mechanism of the Inter-American Convention Against Corrup¬tion: a Preliminary Assessment: Is the Glass Half Empty?”, in Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas, 10-2, 2004. Engel, E. et al. Informe del Grupo Asesor de Expertos en anticorrupción, transparencia e integridad para América Latina y el Caribe, Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Washington, D.C., 2018. Feingeblatt, H. (ed.). Los costos sociales de la corrupción, Tegucigalpa, maccih, 2019. Ferrajoli, L. Democracia y garantismo, Madrid, Trotta, 2018. Florencia Tort, C. “The search for synergies: the utopian ideal of cooperation between international anti-corruption mechanisms”, in Bismuth, R. et al. (ed.). The Trasnationalization of Anti-Corruption Law, New York, Routledge, 2021. Fukuyama, F. Political Order and Political Decay, New York, Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2014. Hernández G., J.I., “The Limits of the Rule of Law to Address Systemic Corruption”, November 4, 2021, at https://www.corruptionjusticeandlegitimacy.org/post/the-limits-of-the-rule-of-law-to-address-systemic-corruption. Hernández, J.I. La pandemia de la covid-19 y el Derecho Administrativo en América Latina, Tirant lo Blanch-Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá. Haugaard, M. “Kleptocracy, Authoritarianism and Democracy as Ideal Types of Political Power”, in Journal of Political Power ahead-of-print 2023. Huerta, C. “Los estándares del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos en el fortalecimiento del Estado de derecho y la transformación de la legislación administrativa en México”, in Von Bogdandy, A. et al., La interamericanización del Derecho Administrativo en América Latina, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law-Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales del Estado de Querétaro, Querétaro, 2022. Hirschfeld, K. Gangster States: Organized Crime, Kleptocracy, and Political Collapse, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. Inter-American Comission on Human Rights, Corrupción y Derechos Humanos, Washington D.C., 2019. Jessup, P. “The Estrada doctrine”, in American Journal of International Law 25, 1931. Johnsøn, J. Anti-Corruption Strategies in Fragile States: Theory and Practice in Aid Agen¬cies, Northampton, Edward Elgar, 2016. Kingsbury, B. et al. “Global Administrative Law and Deliberative Democracy”, in The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016. Luján, M. “Algunos aspectos de la lucha contra la corrupción en el ámbito interamericano”, in Agenda Internacional 11-22, 2005. Mazzuca, S.. Latecomer State Formation: Political Geography and Capacity Failure in Latin America, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2021. Morales, M. “Aproximación a los estándares interamericanos sobre corrupción, institucionalidad democrática y derechos humanos”, in Impacto de la corrupción en los derechos humanos, Querétaro, Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales del Estado de Querétaro, 2018. Pasculli, L., and R., N. “The global anti-corruption framework”, in Ryder, N. et al. (ed.). Corruption, Integrity, and the Law: Global Regulatory Challenges, New York, Law of Routledge, 2020. Risse, T. “Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood”, in Risse, T. et al., The Oxford Handbook of Governance, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019. Rose-Ackerman, S. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1999. Rose-Ackerman, S. “Trust, honesty, and corruption: reflection on the state-building process”, in Archives Européennes de Sociologie. European Journal of Sociology, 42(3), 2001. Rose, C. International Anti-Corruption Norms, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015. Rotberg, R. “Repressive, Aggressive and Rogue Nation-States”, in Rotberg, R. (ed.). Worst of the Worst. Dealing with Repressive and Rogue Nations, Cambridge. World Peace Foundation and Brookings Institution Press, 2017. Rotberg, R. The Corruption Cure: How Citizens and Leaders Can Combat Graft, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2017. Scharbatke-Church, C., and Chigas, D. Understanding Social Norms. A Reference Guide for Policy and Practice, The Fletcher School, 2019. Shea, D. R. The Calvo clause, Minneapolis, The University of Minnesota Press, 1955. Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2023, Berlin, 2023. Tushnet, M. “Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Some Conceptual Issues”, in Ginsburg, T. and Simpser, A. (ed.), Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018. Urosa, D. and Hernández G., J.I., “La Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y el Derecho procesal convencional. Un estudio del Derecho Procesal Público Global”, in Brewer-Carías, A. and Ayala, C. (ed.). Libro homenaje al Dr. Pedro Nikken, vol. i, Caracas: Academia de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 2021. Wabwile, N. “Transnational Corruption, Violations of Human Rights and States’ Extraterritorial Responsibility: A Case for International Action Strategies”, in African Journal of Legal Studies, 8(1-2), 2015. Webb, P. “The United Nations Convention Against Corruption-Global achievement or missed opportunity?”, in Journal of International Economic Law, 8(1), 2005. Wolf, M. “The World Needs an International Anti-Corruption Court”, Daedalus 147(3), 2018. Zagaris, B. International White-Collar Crime, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 2010. Zysset, A. “International crimes through the lens of global constitutionalism”, in Global Constitutionalism, 12: 1, 2023. |
type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
type_content |
Text |
publishDate |
2024-04-29 |
date_accessioned |
2024-04-29T11:53:04Z |
date_available |
2024-04-29T11:53:04Z |
url |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/9397 |
url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n59.09 |
issn |
0122-9893 |
eissn |
2346-2051 |
doi |
10.18601/01229893.n59.09 |
citationstartpage |
261 |
citationendpage |
290 |
url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/9397/16175 |
url3_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/9397/16176 |
_version_ |
1811199927215194112 |