Titulo:

Private Military and Security Companies, Responsibility of States and International Humanitarian Law: Toward an Interdisciplinary Definition
.

Sumario:

El objetivo del artículo es doble. En primer lugar, identificar los elementos que distinguen a las Compañías militares y de seguridad privadas (CMSP) de otras entidades. En segundo lugar, proponer una definición de las CMSP en el derecho internacional humanitario (DIH). La hipótesis del estudio es que el tipo de servicios militares prestados por las CMSP, su participación directa en las hostilidades y las llamadas “tres externalidades” son los elementos centrales de las CMSP y brindan una base sólida para su definición en el DIH. La metodología de investigación aplicada se basa en la orientación epistemológica interpretativista, la cual se refleja a través de una pregunta de investigación abierta que busca examinar una serie de elementos y... Ver más

Guardado en:

0122-9893

2346-2051

2023-08-30

135

160

Mario Urueña-Sánchez, Héctor Olásolo - 2023

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id metarevistapublica_uexternado_revistaderechodelestado_81_article_8958
record_format ojs
spelling Private Military and Security Companies, Responsibility of States and International Humanitarian Law: Toward an Interdisciplinary Definition
Private Military and Security Companies, Responsibility of States and International Humanitarian Law: Toward an Interdisciplinary Definition
El objetivo del artículo es doble. En primer lugar, identificar los elementos que distinguen a las Compañías militares y de seguridad privadas (CMSP) de otras entidades. En segundo lugar, proponer una definición de las CMSP en el derecho internacional humanitario (DIH). La hipótesis del estudio es que el tipo de servicios militares prestados por las CMSP, su participación directa en las hostilidades y las llamadas “tres externalidades” son los elementos centrales de las CMSP y brindan una base sólida para su definición en el DIH. La metodología de investigación aplicada se basa en la orientación epistemológica interpretativista, la cual se refleja a través de una pregunta de investigación abierta que busca examinar una serie de elementos y procesos observables que contribuyen a determinar el resultado. Para ello, la pregunta de investigación se formula de tal forma que el análisis propuesto ilustra la forma en que los agentes sociales e internacionales representan “el mundo” y un objeto de estudio (las CMSP y su personal) a través de sus interpretaciones intersubjetivas. Esta es la preferida por el pluralismo metodológico y los enfoques interdisciplinarios.
The aim of the article is two-fold. First, to identify the elements that distinguish private military and security companies (PMSCS) from other entities. Second, to propose a definition of PMSCS under international humanitarian law (IHL). The hypothesis of the study is that the type of military services provided by PMSCS, their direct participation in hostilities and the so-called ‘three externalities’ are the core elements of PMSCS and provide a solid basis for their definition in IHL. The research methodology applied is based upon the interpretivist epistemological orientation, which is reflected through an open research question which seeks to examine a range of elements and observable processes which contribute to determining the result. To do this, the research question is formulated in such a way that the proposed analysis illustrates the way in which social and international agents represent “the world” and an object of study (PMSCS and their personnel) through their intersubjective interpretations. This is preferred by methodological pluralism and interdisciplinary focuses.
Urueña-Sánchez, Mario
Olásolo, Héctor
Private Military and Security Companies,
military services,
direct participation in hostilities,
international humanitarian law,
States’ international responsibility
Compañías Militares y de Seguridad Privadas,
servicios militares,
participación directa en las hostilidades,
derecho internacional humanitario,
responsabilidad internacional de los Estados
57
Núm. 57 , Año 2023 : Septiembre-Diciembre
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2023-08-30T11:54:52Z
2023-08-30T11:54:52Z
2023-08-30
application/pdf
text/html
text/xml
Departamento de Derecho Constitucional
Revista Derecho del Estado
0122-9893
2346-2051
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8958
10.18601/01229893.n57.06
https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n57.06
spa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Mario Urueña-Sánchez, Héctor Olásolo - 2023
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
135
160
Avant, D. D. The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Bjotveit, P. Treath or Asset?: How Private Security Companies and Private Military Companies affect the US Monopoly on Legitimate Force [Master’s thesis]. Oslo: Universitet i Oslo, 2008.
Boone, M. Private Military Companies and State Sovereignty: An English School Approach to Regulation and its Consequences [Master’s thesis]. Halifax: Dalhousie University, 2011.
Bosch, S. Private Security Contractors and International Humanitarian Law – A Skirmish for Recognition in International Armed Conflicts. In African Security Review. Nº. 16, 2007, 34-52.
Brooks, D. Messiahs or Mercenaries? The Future of International Private Military Services. In International Peacekeeping. Vol. 7, Nº. 4, 2000, 129-144.
Cameron, L. and Chetail, V. Privatizing War: Private Military and Security Companies under Public International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Cano Linares, M. Á. El Derecho internacional humanitario frente al uso de la fuerza como actividad empresarial. ¿El fin de un monopolio?. In Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional. Vol. 24, 2008, 47-77.
Chesterman, S. and Lehnardt, C. (ed). From Mercenaries to Market: The Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Clark, M. K. In the Company of Soldiers: Private Security Companies’ Impact on Military Effectiveness and the Democratic Advantage [PhD thesis]. Ithaca: Cornell University, 2008.
Coufal, L. More than Mercenaries?: Mercenaries, Sierra Leone, and the Rise of Private Military Companies [Master’s thesis], Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 2007.
Daniels, P. R. Just War and Administrative Personnel in the Private Military Industry. In Journal of Military Ethics. Vol. 14, Nº. 2, 2015, 146-161.
Drutschmann, S. Motivation, Markets and Client Relations in the British Private Security Industry. [PhD thesis], London: King’s College London, 2014.
Ellington, S. The Rise of Battlefield Private Contractors. In Public Integrity. Vol. 13, Nº. 2, 2011, 131-148.
Elsea, J. K. Private Security Contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan: Legal Issues. Russia, China and Eurasia-Social. In Historical. Vol. 27, Nº. 1, 2011, 45-93.
Ettinger, A. After the Gold Rush: Corporate Warriors and The Market for Force Revisited. In International Journal. Vol. 69, Nº. 4, 2014, 559-569.
General Assembly United Nations and Human Rights Council. Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination. A/hrc/15/25. UN, 2010.
General Assembly United Nations and Human Rights Council. Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of People to Self-Determination: addendum. A/hrc/7/7/ Add.3. UN, 2008.
Hansen, J. Rethinking the Regulation of Private Military and Security Companies under International Humanitarian Law. In Fordham International Law Journal. Vol. 35, Nº. 3 2012, 698–736.
Heinecken, L. Outsourcing Public Security: The Unforeseen Consequences for the Military Profession. In Armed Forces & Society. Vol. 40, Nº. 4, 2014, 625–646.
Hurst, S. M. Trade in Force: the need for effective regulation of private military and security companies. In California Law Review. Vol. 84, 2011, 448–490.
Huskey, K. A. Accountability for Private Military and Security Contractors in the International Legal Regime. In Criminal Justice Ethics. Vol. 31, Nº. 3, 2012, 193–212.
International Committee of the Red Cross (ed.). Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. 1949.
International Committee of the Red Cross and Federal Department of Foreign Affairs FDFA. The Montreux Document: On pertinent international legal obligations and good practices for States related to operations of private military and security companies during armed conflict. Geneva: ICRC, 2009.
Jackson, P. War is much too serious a thing to be left to military men: Private military companies, combat and regulation. In Civil Wars, Vol. 5, Nº. 4, 2002, 30–55.
Jerbi, S., Clapham, A., Priddy, A. and Casey-Maslen, S. (eds.). The International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers, Academy Briefing. Geneva: Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, 2013.
Joachim, J. and Schneiker, A. All for one and one in all: private military security companies as soldiers, business managers and humanitarians. In Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 27, Nº 2, 2014, 246–267.
Kálmán, J. Mercenaries reloaded? Applicability of the Notion of ‘Mercenaries’ in Relation to Private Military Companies and their Employees. In Acta Juridica Hungarica. Vol. 54, 2013, 367–383.
Kinsey, C. Corporate soldiers and international security: the rise of private military companies, Contemporary security studies. London; New York: Routledge, 2006.
Koroleva, A. Las empresas militares y de seguridad privadas en los conflictos armados desde la perspectiva del derecho internacional [Master thesis]. Getafe: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 2014.
Laboire Iglesias, M. La privatización de la seguridad: Las empresas militares y de seguridad privadas en el entorno estratégico actual. Madrid: Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos, 2012.
Macías, A. The Impact of PMSC on the Role of Today’s Military. In Revista Opera. Nº. 12, 2012, 221–238.
Matteo, D. The use of private military and security companies in international society: contestation and legitimation of state practice [PhD thesis]. London: University of Westminster, 2015.
Melzer, N. Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law. Geneva: ICRC, 2009
Milkeraitytė, K. Private Military and Security Companies and their personnel in the context o International Humanitarian Law [Master thesis]. Vilna: Mykolas Romeris University, 2008.
De Winter-Schmitt, R. (ed.). Montreux Five Years On: An analysis of State efforts to implement Monteux Document legal obligations and good practice. Washington: American University, 2013.
Ortiz, C. Private armed forces and global security: a guide to the issues, Contemporary military, strategic, and security issues. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010.
Pattison, J. The legitimacy of the military, private military and security companies, and just war theory. In European Journal of Political Theory. Vol. 11, Nº.2, 2012, 131–154.
Percy, S. Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007
Pozo Serrano, P. and Hernández Martín, L., 2018. El marco jurídico de las CMSP. Reflexiones a propósito de la experiencia en Irak. In Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional. Vol. 23, 2007, 315–351.
Rothe, D. L. and Ross, J. I. Private Military Contractors, Crime, and the Terrain of Unaccountability. In Justice Quarterly. Vol. 27, Nº. 4, 2010, 593–617.
Schmitt, M. N. Humanitarian Law and Direct Participation in Hostilities by Private Contractors or Civilian Employees. In Chicago Journal of International Law. Vol. 5, Nº2, 2005, 511–546.
Schreier, F. and Caparini, M. Privatising Security: Law, Practice and Governance Private Military and Security Companies. In Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF): Occasional Paper. n.º 6, 2005
Shearer, D. The expansion of the private military sector. In The Adelphi Papers. Vol. 38, Nº. 316, 1998, 23–37.
Singer, P. W. Humanitarian Principles, Private Military Agents: Implications of the Privatized Military Industry for the Humanitarian Community. In The Brown Journal of World Affairs Vol. 13, n.º, 1, 2006, 105–121.
United Nations. Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts 2001. UN, 2005.
United Nations, Office of the United Nations and High Commissioner for Human Rights. Draft International Convention on the Regulation, Oversight and Monitoring of Private Military and Security Companies. UN, 13 Jul 2009.
Urbina, J. J. Actores no estatales y externalización de las funciones militares en los conflictos armados: los contratistas privados ante el derecho internacional humanitario. In Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional. Vol. 8, 2015, 41–85.
Urueña-Sánchez, M. I. Mercenarios y compañías militares y de seguridad privadas. Estructuración de sus redes normativas. Perspectivas iberoamericanas sobre la justicia. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2020
Urueña-Sánchez, M. I. Las compañías militares de seguridad privada: ¿los nuevos mercenarios?. In Revista Criminalidad Vol. 61, n.º. 1, 2019, 97–110.
Verdad abierta. Los viajes de Yair Klein a Colombia. 2012. Available at from: https://verdadabierta.com/los-viajes-de-yair-klein-a-colombia/ [Accessed 2 Nov 2022].
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8958/15341
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8958/15342
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8958/15343
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication
institution UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista Derecho del Estado
title Private Military and Security Companies, Responsibility of States and International Humanitarian Law: Toward an Interdisciplinary Definition
spellingShingle Private Military and Security Companies, Responsibility of States and International Humanitarian Law: Toward an Interdisciplinary Definition
Urueña-Sánchez, Mario
Olásolo, Héctor
Private Military and Security Companies,
military services,
direct participation in hostilities,
international humanitarian law,
States’ international responsibility
Compañías Militares y de Seguridad Privadas,
servicios militares,
participación directa en las hostilidades,
derecho internacional humanitario,
responsabilidad internacional de los Estados
title_short Private Military and Security Companies, Responsibility of States and International Humanitarian Law: Toward an Interdisciplinary Definition
title_full Private Military and Security Companies, Responsibility of States and International Humanitarian Law: Toward an Interdisciplinary Definition
title_fullStr Private Military and Security Companies, Responsibility of States and International Humanitarian Law: Toward an Interdisciplinary Definition
title_full_unstemmed Private Military and Security Companies, Responsibility of States and International Humanitarian Law: Toward an Interdisciplinary Definition
title_sort private military and security companies, responsibility of states and international humanitarian law: toward an interdisciplinary definition
title_eng Private Military and Security Companies, Responsibility of States and International Humanitarian Law: Toward an Interdisciplinary Definition
description El objetivo del artículo es doble. En primer lugar, identificar los elementos que distinguen a las Compañías militares y de seguridad privadas (CMSP) de otras entidades. En segundo lugar, proponer una definición de las CMSP en el derecho internacional humanitario (DIH). La hipótesis del estudio es que el tipo de servicios militares prestados por las CMSP, su participación directa en las hostilidades y las llamadas “tres externalidades” son los elementos centrales de las CMSP y brindan una base sólida para su definición en el DIH. La metodología de investigación aplicada se basa en la orientación epistemológica interpretativista, la cual se refleja a través de una pregunta de investigación abierta que busca examinar una serie de elementos y procesos observables que contribuyen a determinar el resultado. Para ello, la pregunta de investigación se formula de tal forma que el análisis propuesto ilustra la forma en que los agentes sociales e internacionales representan “el mundo” y un objeto de estudio (las CMSP y su personal) a través de sus interpretaciones intersubjetivas. Esta es la preferida por el pluralismo metodológico y los enfoques interdisciplinarios.
description_eng The aim of the article is two-fold. First, to identify the elements that distinguish private military and security companies (PMSCS) from other entities. Second, to propose a definition of PMSCS under international humanitarian law (IHL). The hypothesis of the study is that the type of military services provided by PMSCS, their direct participation in hostilities and the so-called ‘three externalities’ are the core elements of PMSCS and provide a solid basis for their definition in IHL. The research methodology applied is based upon the interpretivist epistemological orientation, which is reflected through an open research question which seeks to examine a range of elements and observable processes which contribute to determining the result. To do this, the research question is formulated in such a way that the proposed analysis illustrates the way in which social and international agents represent “the world” and an object of study (PMSCS and their personnel) through their intersubjective interpretations. This is preferred by methodological pluralism and interdisciplinary focuses.
author Urueña-Sánchez, Mario
Olásolo, Héctor
author_facet Urueña-Sánchez, Mario
Olásolo, Héctor
topic Private Military and Security Companies,
military services,
direct participation in hostilities,
international humanitarian law,
States’ international responsibility
Compañías Militares y de Seguridad Privadas,
servicios militares,
participación directa en las hostilidades,
derecho internacional humanitario,
responsabilidad internacional de los Estados
topic_facet Private Military and Security Companies,
military services,
direct participation in hostilities,
international humanitarian law,
States’ international responsibility
Compañías Militares y de Seguridad Privadas,
servicios militares,
participación directa en las hostilidades,
derecho internacional humanitario,
responsabilidad internacional de los Estados
topicspa_str_mv Compañías Militares y de Seguridad Privadas,
servicios militares,
participación directa en las hostilidades,
derecho internacional humanitario,
responsabilidad internacional de los Estados
citationissue 57
citationedition Núm. 57 , Año 2023 : Septiembre-Diciembre
publisher Departamento de Derecho Constitucional
ispartofjournal Revista Derecho del Estado
source https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8958
language spa
format Article
rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Mario Urueña-Sánchez, Héctor Olásolo - 2023
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references Avant, D. D. The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Bjotveit, P. Treath or Asset?: How Private Security Companies and Private Military Companies affect the US Monopoly on Legitimate Force [Master’s thesis]. Oslo: Universitet i Oslo, 2008.
Boone, M. Private Military Companies and State Sovereignty: An English School Approach to Regulation and its Consequences [Master’s thesis]. Halifax: Dalhousie University, 2011.
Bosch, S. Private Security Contractors and International Humanitarian Law – A Skirmish for Recognition in International Armed Conflicts. In African Security Review. Nº. 16, 2007, 34-52.
Brooks, D. Messiahs or Mercenaries? The Future of International Private Military Services. In International Peacekeeping. Vol. 7, Nº. 4, 2000, 129-144.
Cameron, L. and Chetail, V. Privatizing War: Private Military and Security Companies under Public International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Cano Linares, M. Á. El Derecho internacional humanitario frente al uso de la fuerza como actividad empresarial. ¿El fin de un monopolio?. In Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional. Vol. 24, 2008, 47-77.
Chesterman, S. and Lehnardt, C. (ed). From Mercenaries to Market: The Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Clark, M. K. In the Company of Soldiers: Private Security Companies’ Impact on Military Effectiveness and the Democratic Advantage [PhD thesis]. Ithaca: Cornell University, 2008.
Coufal, L. More than Mercenaries?: Mercenaries, Sierra Leone, and the Rise of Private Military Companies [Master’s thesis], Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 2007.
Daniels, P. R. Just War and Administrative Personnel in the Private Military Industry. In Journal of Military Ethics. Vol. 14, Nº. 2, 2015, 146-161.
Drutschmann, S. Motivation, Markets and Client Relations in the British Private Security Industry. [PhD thesis], London: King’s College London, 2014.
Ellington, S. The Rise of Battlefield Private Contractors. In Public Integrity. Vol. 13, Nº. 2, 2011, 131-148.
Elsea, J. K. Private Security Contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan: Legal Issues. Russia, China and Eurasia-Social. In Historical. Vol. 27, Nº. 1, 2011, 45-93.
Ettinger, A. After the Gold Rush: Corporate Warriors and The Market for Force Revisited. In International Journal. Vol. 69, Nº. 4, 2014, 559-569.
General Assembly United Nations and Human Rights Council. Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination. A/hrc/15/25. UN, 2010.
General Assembly United Nations and Human Rights Council. Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of People to Self-Determination: addendum. A/hrc/7/7/ Add.3. UN, 2008.
Hansen, J. Rethinking the Regulation of Private Military and Security Companies under International Humanitarian Law. In Fordham International Law Journal. Vol. 35, Nº. 3 2012, 698–736.
Heinecken, L. Outsourcing Public Security: The Unforeseen Consequences for the Military Profession. In Armed Forces & Society. Vol. 40, Nº. 4, 2014, 625–646.
Hurst, S. M. Trade in Force: the need for effective regulation of private military and security companies. In California Law Review. Vol. 84, 2011, 448–490.
Huskey, K. A. Accountability for Private Military and Security Contractors in the International Legal Regime. In Criminal Justice Ethics. Vol. 31, Nº. 3, 2012, 193–212.
International Committee of the Red Cross (ed.). Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. 1949.
International Committee of the Red Cross and Federal Department of Foreign Affairs FDFA. The Montreux Document: On pertinent international legal obligations and good practices for States related to operations of private military and security companies during armed conflict. Geneva: ICRC, 2009.
Jackson, P. War is much too serious a thing to be left to military men: Private military companies, combat and regulation. In Civil Wars, Vol. 5, Nº. 4, 2002, 30–55.
Jerbi, S., Clapham, A., Priddy, A. and Casey-Maslen, S. (eds.). The International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers, Academy Briefing. Geneva: Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, 2013.
Joachim, J. and Schneiker, A. All for one and one in all: private military security companies as soldiers, business managers and humanitarians. In Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 27, Nº 2, 2014, 246–267.
Kálmán, J. Mercenaries reloaded? Applicability of the Notion of ‘Mercenaries’ in Relation to Private Military Companies and their Employees. In Acta Juridica Hungarica. Vol. 54, 2013, 367–383.
Kinsey, C. Corporate soldiers and international security: the rise of private military companies, Contemporary security studies. London; New York: Routledge, 2006.
Koroleva, A. Las empresas militares y de seguridad privadas en los conflictos armados desde la perspectiva del derecho internacional [Master thesis]. Getafe: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 2014.
Laboire Iglesias, M. La privatización de la seguridad: Las empresas militares y de seguridad privadas en el entorno estratégico actual. Madrid: Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos, 2012.
Macías, A. The Impact of PMSC on the Role of Today’s Military. In Revista Opera. Nº. 12, 2012, 221–238.
Matteo, D. The use of private military and security companies in international society: contestation and legitimation of state practice [PhD thesis]. London: University of Westminster, 2015.
Melzer, N. Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law. Geneva: ICRC, 2009
Milkeraitytė, K. Private Military and Security Companies and their personnel in the context o International Humanitarian Law [Master thesis]. Vilna: Mykolas Romeris University, 2008.
De Winter-Schmitt, R. (ed.). Montreux Five Years On: An analysis of State efforts to implement Monteux Document legal obligations and good practice. Washington: American University, 2013.
Ortiz, C. Private armed forces and global security: a guide to the issues, Contemporary military, strategic, and security issues. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010.
Pattison, J. The legitimacy of the military, private military and security companies, and just war theory. In European Journal of Political Theory. Vol. 11, Nº.2, 2012, 131–154.
Percy, S. Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007
Pozo Serrano, P. and Hernández Martín, L., 2018. El marco jurídico de las CMSP. Reflexiones a propósito de la experiencia en Irak. In Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional. Vol. 23, 2007, 315–351.
Rothe, D. L. and Ross, J. I. Private Military Contractors, Crime, and the Terrain of Unaccountability. In Justice Quarterly. Vol. 27, Nº. 4, 2010, 593–617.
Schmitt, M. N. Humanitarian Law and Direct Participation in Hostilities by Private Contractors or Civilian Employees. In Chicago Journal of International Law. Vol. 5, Nº2, 2005, 511–546.
Schreier, F. and Caparini, M. Privatising Security: Law, Practice and Governance Private Military and Security Companies. In Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF): Occasional Paper. n.º 6, 2005
Shearer, D. The expansion of the private military sector. In The Adelphi Papers. Vol. 38, Nº. 316, 1998, 23–37.
Singer, P. W. Humanitarian Principles, Private Military Agents: Implications of the Privatized Military Industry for the Humanitarian Community. In The Brown Journal of World Affairs Vol. 13, n.º, 1, 2006, 105–121.
United Nations. Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts 2001. UN, 2005.
United Nations, Office of the United Nations and High Commissioner for Human Rights. Draft International Convention on the Regulation, Oversight and Monitoring of Private Military and Security Companies. UN, 13 Jul 2009.
Urbina, J. J. Actores no estatales y externalización de las funciones militares en los conflictos armados: los contratistas privados ante el derecho internacional humanitario. In Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional. Vol. 8, 2015, 41–85.
Urueña-Sánchez, M. I. Mercenarios y compañías militares y de seguridad privadas. Estructuración de sus redes normativas. Perspectivas iberoamericanas sobre la justicia. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2020
Urueña-Sánchez, M. I. Las compañías militares de seguridad privada: ¿los nuevos mercenarios?. In Revista Criminalidad Vol. 61, n.º. 1, 2019, 97–110.
Verdad abierta. Los viajes de Yair Klein a Colombia. 2012. Available at from: https://verdadabierta.com/los-viajes-de-yair-klein-a-colombia/ [Accessed 2 Nov 2022].
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2023-08-30
date_accessioned 2023-08-30T11:54:52Z
date_available 2023-08-30T11:54:52Z
url https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8958
url_doi https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n57.06
issn 0122-9893
eissn 2346-2051
doi 10.18601/01229893.n57.06
citationstartpage 135
citationendpage 160
url2_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8958/15341
url3_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8958/15342
url4_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8958/15343
_version_ 1811199924310638592