Titulo:
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review
.
Sumario:
Este artículo presenta un enfoque republicano del control judicial de constitucionalidad de las leyes que se basa en una interpretación deliberativa y participativa de este arreglo institucional. El documento se divide en cinco secciones, más una introducción. La Sección I presenta algunas consideraciones y aclaraciones sobre el concepto de control judicial y el tipo de teoría política republicana que subyace a los principales argumentos del trabajo. La Sección II reconstruye la crítica republicana al control judicial. La Sección III muestra que suscribir una perspectiva republicana no necesariamente lleva a respaldar esta crítica y presenta una defensa del control judicial que se apoya en una concepción republicana de la democracia deliber... Ver más
Guardado en:
0122-9893
2346-2051
2023-08-30
41
83
Alejandro Cortés-Arbeláez - 2023
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
metarevistapublica_uexternado_revistaderechodelestado_81_article_8955 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review Este artículo presenta un enfoque republicano del control judicial de constitucionalidad de las leyes que se basa en una interpretación deliberativa y participativa de este arreglo institucional. El documento se divide en cinco secciones, más una introducción. La Sección I presenta algunas consideraciones y aclaraciones sobre el concepto de control judicial y el tipo de teoría política republicana que subyace a los principales argumentos del trabajo. La Sección II reconstruye la crítica republicana al control judicial. La Sección III muestra que suscribir una perspectiva republicana no necesariamente lleva a respaldar esta crítica y presenta una defensa del control judicial que se apoya en una concepción republicana de la democracia deliberativa que enfatiza el potencial de esta institución como un mecanismo que sirve para promover la participación política en igualdad de condiciones y que, por tanto, dota al control judicial de una legitimidad democrática participativa. La Sección IV argumenta que la legitimidad democrática participativa del control judicial debe ser vista como un fenómeno gradual cuya fuerza o debilidad relativa depende de las variaciones de las características específicas del contexto institucional donde opera el poder judicial. La Sección V presenta algunas conclusiones. This paper presents a republican approach to judicial review that is based on a deliberative and participatory interpretation of this institutional arrangement. The paper is divided into five sections, plus an introduction. Section I presents some considerations and clarifications regarding the concept of judicial review and the type of republican political theory that underlies the main arguments. Section II reconstructs the republican critique of judicial review. Section III shows that subscribing to a republican perspective does not necessarily lead to the endorsement of this critique and presents a defense of judicial review that relies on a republican conception of deliberative democracy that stresses the potential of this institution as a mechanism that serves to promote political participation in equal terms and that, thus, imbues judicial review with a participatory democratic legitimacy. Section IV argues that the participatory democratic legitimacy of judicial review should be seen as a gradual phenomenon whose relative strength or weakness depends on the variations of specific characteristics of the institutional context where the judiciary operates. Section V presents some conclusions. Cortés-Arbeláez, Alejandro Judicial review, republicanism, democracy, participation, legitimacy Control judicial, republicanismo, democracia, participación, legitimidad 57 Núm. 57 , Año 2023 : Septiembre-Diciembre Artículo de revista Journal article 2023-08-30T11:54:52Z 2023-08-30T11:54:52Z 2023-08-30 application/pdf text/html text/xml Departamento de Derecho Constitucional Revista Derecho del Estado 0122-9893 2346-2051 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8955 10.18601/01229893.n57.03 https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n57.03 spa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Alejandro Cortés-Arbeláez - 2023 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. 41 83 Alsina, Victòria, and José Luis Martí. “The Birth of the Crowdlaw Movement: Tech-Based Citizen Participation, Legitimacy and the Quality of Lawmaking.” Analyse & Kritik 40 (2), 2018, 317–38. Angel-Cabo, Natalia. “The Constitution and the City: Reflections on Judicial Experimentalism Through an Urban Lens.” In European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2020, edited by E. Hirsch Ballin, G. van der Schyff, M. Stremler, and M. De Visser, Vol. 2. European Yearbook of Constitutional Law. The Hague: Asser Press, 2021. Bächtiger, Andre, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. “Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren, 1–32. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford University Press, 2018. Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism. A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2007. Bellamy, Richard. “The Republic of Reasons: Public Reasoning, Depolitization, and Non-Domination.” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009. Bello Hutt, Donald. “Deliberation and Courts: The Role of the Judiciary in a Deliberative System.” Theoria, 64 (3), 2017, 77–103. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2017.6415204. Bello Hutt, Donald. “Measuring Popular and Judicial Deliberation: A Critical Comparison.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(4), 2018, 1121–47. Bello Hutt, Donald. “The Deliberative Constitutionalism Debate and a Republican Way Forward.” Jurisprudence. An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 12(1), 2020, 69–88. Besson, Samantha, and José Luis Martí. “Law and Republicanism: Mapping the Issues.” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009. Bickel, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Second Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986. Chambers, Simone. “Citizens Without Robes: On the Deliberative Potential of Everyday Politics.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy 16(2), 2020, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.388. Comparative Constitutions Project. “Replication Data for the Research Paper: Ginsburg, T., & Versteeg, M. Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” University of Virginia School of Law Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series 2013-29.” Comparative Constitutions Project (blog), 2013. Dryzek, John S. “Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building.” Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 2009, 1379–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332129. Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Harvard University Press, 2001. Estlund, David, and Hélène Landemore. “The Epistemic Value of Democratic Deliberation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. Oxford University Press, 2018. Eylon, Yuval, and Aron Harel. “The Right to Judicial Review.” Virginia Law Review 92, 2006, 991–1022. Ferejohn, John, and Pasquale Pasquino. “Constitutional Courts as Deliberative Institutions: Toward an Institutional Theory of Constitutional Justice.” In Constitutional justice, east and west, edited by Wojciech Sadurski. Kluwer Law International, 2002. Ferreres, Víctor. Justicia Constitucional y Democracia. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 1997. Gargarella, Roberto. “Why Do We Care about Dialogue? ‘Notwithstanding Clause’, ‘Meaningful Engagement’ and Public Hearings: A Sympathetic but Critical Analysis.” In The Future of Economic and Social Rights, edited by Katharine G. Young. Globalization and Human Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2019. Ginsburg, Tom, and Tamir Moustafa. “Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Tom Ginsburg and Tamir Moustafa, 1–22. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Ginsburg, Tom, and Mila Versteeg. “Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 30(3), 2014. Goodin, Robert. Innovating Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2008. Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusets: The MIT Press, 1996. Harel, Aron. Why Law Matters. Oxford University Press, 2014. Hartmann-Cortés, Kevin, Juan Felipe Herrera, and Gabriel Hernando Angarita. “La ‘Privatización’ de la acción pública de inconstitucionalidad.” Revista Derecho del Estado, 50, 2021, 203–59. Hilbink, Lisa. “Assessing the New Constitutionalism.” Comparative Politics, 40(2), 2008), 227–45. Honohan, Iseult. “Republicans, Rights, and Constitutions: Is Judicial Review Compatible with Republican Self-Government?” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009. Hübner Mendes, Conrado. Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy. Oxford Constitutional Theory. Oxford University Press, 2013. Laborde, Cécile, and John Maynor. “The Republican Contribution to Contemporary Political Theory.” In Republicanism and Political Theory, edited by Cécile Laborde and John Maynor, 1–28. Oxford. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. Lafont, Cristina. Democracy without Shortcuts. A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2020. Landau, David, and Rosalind Dixon. “Abusive Judicial Review: Courts Against Democracy.” University of California Davis Law Review, FSU College of Law, Public Law, 53(1313), 2020, 1313–87. Linares, Sebastián. Democracia Participativa Epistémica. Filosofía y Derecho. Marcial Pons, 2017. Linares, Sebastián. “Democracia sin atajos: cognitivamente exigente pero participativamente austera.” Revista Derecho del Estado, 55, 2023, 57–85. Linares, Sebastián. La (i) legitimidad democrática del control judicial de las leyes. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2008. Lustig, Doreen, and J. H. H. Weiler. “Judicial Review in the Contemporary World—Retrospective and Prospective.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(2), 2018, 315–72. Mansbridge, Jane. “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, edited by Stephen Macedo, 211–42. Oxford University Press, 1999. Mansbridge, Jane, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, Thomas Christiano, Archon Fung, John Parkinson, Dennis Thompson, and Mark Warren. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by Jane Mansbridge and John Parkinson, 1–26. Cambridge University Press, 2012. Martí, José Luis. “Is Constitutional Rigidity the Problem? Democratic Legitimacy and the Last Word.” Ratio Juris 27(4), 2014. Martí, José Luis. La República Deliberativa. Una Teoría de la Democracia. Madrid, Barcelona: Marcial Pons, 2006. Martí, José Luis. “The Role of New Technologies in Deliberative Democracy.” In Rule of Law vs Majoritarian Democracy, edited by Giuliano Amato, Benedetta Barbisan, and Cesare Pinelli. Bloomsbury, 2021. Owen, David, and Graham Smith. “Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 23(2), 2015, 213–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12054. Pettit, Philip. “Civic Republican Political Theory.” In A Political Philosophy in Public Life: Civic Republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain, by Philip Pettit and José Luis Martí. Princeton University Press, 2012. Pettit, Philip. “Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory.” Nomos 42, 2000, 105–44. Pettit, Philip. “Depoliticizing Democracy.” Ratio Juris 17(1), 2004, 52–65. Pettit, Philip. “Keeping Republican Freedom Simple. On a Difference with Quentin Skinner.” Political Theory 30(3), 2002, 339–56. Pettit, Philip. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press, 1997. Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, 1996. Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, 2012. Tomkins, Adam. “The Role of the Courts in the Political Constitution.” University of Toronto Law Journal, 60, 2010, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.60.1.1. Valentini, Chiara. “Deliberative Constitutionalism and Judicial Review.” Revus [Online] 47 (2022). http://journals.openedition.org/revus/8030. Vandamme, Pierre-Étienne, and Donald Bello Hutt. “Selecting Constitutional Judges Randomly.” Swiss Political Science Review, 21(1), 2021, 107–27. Waldron, Jeremy. “Five to Four: Why Do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts?” The Yale Law Journal 123, 2014, 1692–1730. Waldron, Jeremy. “Judges as Moral Reasoners.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 7(1), 2009, 2–24. Waldron, Jeremy. “Judicial Review and Republican Government.” In That Eminent Tribunal. Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution, edited by Christopher Wolfe. New Forum Books, 2004. Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press, 1999. Waldron, Jeremy. “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review.” The Yale Law Journal, 2006. https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15332 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15333 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15334 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista Derecho del Estado |
| title |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review |
| spellingShingle |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review Cortés-Arbeláez, Alejandro Judicial review, republicanism, democracy, participation, legitimacy Control judicial, republicanismo, democracia, participación, legitimidad |
| title_short |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review |
| title_full |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review |
| title_fullStr |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review |
| title_sort |
judges without robes: a republican approach to participatory judicial review |
| title_eng |
Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review |
| description |
Este artículo presenta un enfoque republicano del control judicial de constitucionalidad de las leyes que se basa en una interpretación deliberativa y participativa de este arreglo institucional. El documento se divide en cinco secciones, más una introducción. La Sección I presenta algunas consideraciones y aclaraciones sobre el concepto de control judicial y el tipo de teoría política republicana que subyace a los principales argumentos del trabajo. La Sección II reconstruye la crítica republicana al control judicial. La Sección III muestra que suscribir una perspectiva republicana no necesariamente lleva a respaldar esta crítica y presenta una defensa del control judicial que se apoya en una concepción republicana de la democracia deliberativa que enfatiza el potencial de esta institución como un mecanismo que sirve para promover la participación política en igualdad de condiciones y que, por tanto, dota al control judicial de una legitimidad democrática participativa. La Sección IV argumenta que la legitimidad democrática participativa del control judicial debe ser vista como un fenómeno gradual cuya fuerza o debilidad relativa depende de las variaciones de las características específicas del contexto institucional donde opera el poder judicial. La Sección V presenta algunas conclusiones.
|
| description_eng |
This paper presents a republican approach to judicial review that is based on a deliberative and participatory interpretation of this institutional arrangement. The paper is divided into five sections, plus an introduction. Section I presents some considerations and clarifications regarding the concept of judicial review and the type of republican political theory that underlies the main arguments. Section II reconstructs the republican critique of judicial review. Section III shows that subscribing to a republican perspective does not necessarily lead to the endorsement of this critique and presents a defense of judicial review that relies on a republican conception of deliberative democracy that stresses the potential of this institution as a mechanism that serves to promote political participation in equal terms and that, thus, imbues judicial review with a participatory democratic legitimacy. Section IV argues that the participatory democratic legitimacy of judicial review should be seen as a gradual phenomenon whose relative strength or weakness depends on the variations of specific characteristics of the institutional context where the judiciary operates. Section V presents some conclusions.
|
| author |
Cortés-Arbeláez, Alejandro |
| author_facet |
Cortés-Arbeláez, Alejandro |
| topic |
Judicial review, republicanism, democracy, participation, legitimacy Control judicial, republicanismo, democracia, participación, legitimidad |
| topic_facet |
Judicial review, republicanism, democracy, participation, legitimacy Control judicial, republicanismo, democracia, participación, legitimidad |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Control judicial, republicanismo, democracia, participación, legitimidad |
| citationissue |
57 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 57 , Año 2023 : Septiembre-Diciembre |
| publisher |
Departamento de Derecho Constitucional |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista Derecho del Estado |
| source |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8955 |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Alejandro Cortés-Arbeláez - 2023 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references |
Alsina, Victòria, and José Luis Martí. “The Birth of the Crowdlaw Movement: Tech-Based Citizen Participation, Legitimacy and the Quality of Lawmaking.” Analyse & Kritik 40 (2), 2018, 317–38. Angel-Cabo, Natalia. “The Constitution and the City: Reflections on Judicial Experimentalism Through an Urban Lens.” In European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2020, edited by E. Hirsch Ballin, G. van der Schyff, M. Stremler, and M. De Visser, Vol. 2. European Yearbook of Constitutional Law. The Hague: Asser Press, 2021. Bächtiger, Andre, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. “Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren, 1–32. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford University Press, 2018. Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism. A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2007. Bellamy, Richard. “The Republic of Reasons: Public Reasoning, Depolitization, and Non-Domination.” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009. Bello Hutt, Donald. “Deliberation and Courts: The Role of the Judiciary in a Deliberative System.” Theoria, 64 (3), 2017, 77–103. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2017.6415204. Bello Hutt, Donald. “Measuring Popular and Judicial Deliberation: A Critical Comparison.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(4), 2018, 1121–47. Bello Hutt, Donald. “The Deliberative Constitutionalism Debate and a Republican Way Forward.” Jurisprudence. An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 12(1), 2020, 69–88. Besson, Samantha, and José Luis Martí. “Law and Republicanism: Mapping the Issues.” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009. Bickel, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Second Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986. Chambers, Simone. “Citizens Without Robes: On the Deliberative Potential of Everyday Politics.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy 16(2), 2020, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.388. Comparative Constitutions Project. “Replication Data for the Research Paper: Ginsburg, T., & Versteeg, M. Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” University of Virginia School of Law Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series 2013-29.” Comparative Constitutions Project (blog), 2013. Dryzek, John S. “Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building.” Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 2009, 1379–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332129. Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Harvard University Press, 2001. Estlund, David, and Hélène Landemore. “The Epistemic Value of Democratic Deliberation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. Oxford University Press, 2018. Eylon, Yuval, and Aron Harel. “The Right to Judicial Review.” Virginia Law Review 92, 2006, 991–1022. Ferejohn, John, and Pasquale Pasquino. “Constitutional Courts as Deliberative Institutions: Toward an Institutional Theory of Constitutional Justice.” In Constitutional justice, east and west, edited by Wojciech Sadurski. Kluwer Law International, 2002. Ferreres, Víctor. Justicia Constitucional y Democracia. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 1997. Gargarella, Roberto. “Why Do We Care about Dialogue? ‘Notwithstanding Clause’, ‘Meaningful Engagement’ and Public Hearings: A Sympathetic but Critical Analysis.” In The Future of Economic and Social Rights, edited by Katharine G. Young. Globalization and Human Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2019. Ginsburg, Tom, and Tamir Moustafa. “Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Tom Ginsburg and Tamir Moustafa, 1–22. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Ginsburg, Tom, and Mila Versteeg. “Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 30(3), 2014. Goodin, Robert. Innovating Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2008. Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusets: The MIT Press, 1996. Harel, Aron. Why Law Matters. Oxford University Press, 2014. Hartmann-Cortés, Kevin, Juan Felipe Herrera, and Gabriel Hernando Angarita. “La ‘Privatización’ de la acción pública de inconstitucionalidad.” Revista Derecho del Estado, 50, 2021, 203–59. Hilbink, Lisa. “Assessing the New Constitutionalism.” Comparative Politics, 40(2), 2008), 227–45. Honohan, Iseult. “Republicans, Rights, and Constitutions: Is Judicial Review Compatible with Republican Self-Government?” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009. Hübner Mendes, Conrado. Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy. Oxford Constitutional Theory. Oxford University Press, 2013. Laborde, Cécile, and John Maynor. “The Republican Contribution to Contemporary Political Theory.” In Republicanism and Political Theory, edited by Cécile Laborde and John Maynor, 1–28. Oxford. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. Lafont, Cristina. Democracy without Shortcuts. A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2020. Landau, David, and Rosalind Dixon. “Abusive Judicial Review: Courts Against Democracy.” University of California Davis Law Review, FSU College of Law, Public Law, 53(1313), 2020, 1313–87. Linares, Sebastián. Democracia Participativa Epistémica. Filosofía y Derecho. Marcial Pons, 2017. Linares, Sebastián. “Democracia sin atajos: cognitivamente exigente pero participativamente austera.” Revista Derecho del Estado, 55, 2023, 57–85. Linares, Sebastián. La (i) legitimidad democrática del control judicial de las leyes. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2008. Lustig, Doreen, and J. H. H. Weiler. “Judicial Review in the Contemporary World—Retrospective and Prospective.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(2), 2018, 315–72. Mansbridge, Jane. “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, edited by Stephen Macedo, 211–42. Oxford University Press, 1999. Mansbridge, Jane, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, Thomas Christiano, Archon Fung, John Parkinson, Dennis Thompson, and Mark Warren. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by Jane Mansbridge and John Parkinson, 1–26. Cambridge University Press, 2012. Martí, José Luis. “Is Constitutional Rigidity the Problem? Democratic Legitimacy and the Last Word.” Ratio Juris 27(4), 2014. Martí, José Luis. La República Deliberativa. Una Teoría de la Democracia. Madrid, Barcelona: Marcial Pons, 2006. Martí, José Luis. “The Role of New Technologies in Deliberative Democracy.” In Rule of Law vs Majoritarian Democracy, edited by Giuliano Amato, Benedetta Barbisan, and Cesare Pinelli. Bloomsbury, 2021. Owen, David, and Graham Smith. “Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 23(2), 2015, 213–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12054. Pettit, Philip. “Civic Republican Political Theory.” In A Political Philosophy in Public Life: Civic Republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain, by Philip Pettit and José Luis Martí. Princeton University Press, 2012. Pettit, Philip. “Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory.” Nomos 42, 2000, 105–44. Pettit, Philip. “Depoliticizing Democracy.” Ratio Juris 17(1), 2004, 52–65. Pettit, Philip. “Keeping Republican Freedom Simple. On a Difference with Quentin Skinner.” Political Theory 30(3), 2002, 339–56. Pettit, Philip. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press, 1997. Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, 1996. Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, 2012. Tomkins, Adam. “The Role of the Courts in the Political Constitution.” University of Toronto Law Journal, 60, 2010, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.60.1.1. Valentini, Chiara. “Deliberative Constitutionalism and Judicial Review.” Revus [Online] 47 (2022). http://journals.openedition.org/revus/8030. Vandamme, Pierre-Étienne, and Donald Bello Hutt. “Selecting Constitutional Judges Randomly.” Swiss Political Science Review, 21(1), 2021, 107–27. Waldron, Jeremy. “Five to Four: Why Do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts?” The Yale Law Journal 123, 2014, 1692–1730. Waldron, Jeremy. “Judges as Moral Reasoners.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 7(1), 2009, 2–24. Waldron, Jeremy. “Judicial Review and Republican Government.” In That Eminent Tribunal. Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution, edited by Christopher Wolfe. New Forum Books, 2004. Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press, 1999. Waldron, Jeremy. “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review.” The Yale Law Journal, 2006. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2023-08-30 |
| date_accessioned |
2023-08-30T11:54:52Z |
| date_available |
2023-08-30T11:54:52Z |
| url |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8955 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n57.03 |
| issn |
0122-9893 |
| eissn |
2346-2051 |
| doi |
10.18601/01229893.n57.03 |
| citationstartpage |
41 |
| citationendpage |
83 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15332 |
| url3_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15333 |
| url4_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15334 |
| _version_ |
1811199924013891584 |