Titulo:
Los Principios de París y las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos en América Latina
.
Sumario:
Los Principios de París proveen los parámetros a través los cuales se miden las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos, en el importante proceso de acreditación que administra la red internacional que hoy las agrupa. Por su origen, dichos principios privilegian como modelo institucional a la comisión de derechos humanos sobre el ombudsman y el instituto de derechos humanos, y se centran en la creación de estas instituciones, más que en su posterior funcionamiento. Estos dos aspectos constituyen una limitante de dichos principios. Aun cuando el primero de estos problemas ha sido superado en la práctica, el segundo se mantiene plenamente vigente, por lo que sería conveniente identificar criterios de eficiencia que vayan más allá del dis... Ver más
Guardado en:
0122-9893
2346-2051
2022-04-28
67
95
Sebastián López Escarcena - 2022
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
metarevistapublica_uexternado_revistaderechodelestado_81_article_7797 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Los Principios de París y las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos en América Latina Paris Principles and National Human Rights Institutions in Latin America Los Principios de París proveen los parámetros a través los cuales se miden las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos, en el importante proceso de acreditación que administra la red internacional que hoy las agrupa. Por su origen, dichos principios privilegian como modelo institucional a la comisión de derechos humanos sobre el ombudsman y el instituto de derechos humanos, y se centran en la creación de estas instituciones, más que en su posterior funcionamiento. Estos dos aspectos constituyen una limitante de dichos principios. Aun cuando el primero de estos problemas ha sido superado en la práctica, el segundo se mantiene plenamente vigente, por lo que sería conveniente identificar criterios de eficiencia que vayan más allá del diseño institucional y orienten a las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos en el cumplimiento efectivo de sus funciones. En el caso de América Latina, es esencial velar por la integración de estas instituciones para el logro de dicho objetivo. Solo contando con un personal adecuado pueden estas persuadir e influir no solo a los órganos estatales, sino también a la sociedad civil, promoviendo y protegiendo así los derechos humanos de todos. The Paris Principles are the benchmark against which national human rights institutions are measured in the important accreditation process managed by the international network that groups them today. Because of their origin, these principles favour the human rights commission as institutional model over the ombudsman and the human rights institute, and focuses on the creation of these institutions, rather than in their subsequent operation. These two aspects constitute a limitation to such principles. Even though the first of these problems has been solved in practice, the second one remains a reality that requires identifying criteria of efficiency going beyond institutional design and guiding national human rights institutions in the effective fulfilment of their functions. In the case of Latin America, it is essential not to lose sight of the integration of these institutions to achieve this goal. Only with adequate personnel they can persuade and influence not only state organs, but also civil society, thus promoting and protecting the human rights of all. López Escarcena, Sebastián Ombuds offices, human rights commissions, human rights institutes, Paris Principles, institutional accreditation Defensorías del pueblo, comisiones de derechos humanos, institutos de derechos humanos, Principios de París, acreditación institucional 52 Núm. 52 , Año 2022 : Mayo - Agosto Artículo de revista Journal article 2022-04-28T10:28:55Z 2022-04-28T10:28:55Z 2022-04-28 application/pdf text/html text/xml Departamento de Derecho Constitucional Revista Derecho del Estado 0122-9893 2346-2051 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/7797 10.18601/01229893.n52.03 https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n52.03 spa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Sebastián López Escarcena - 2022 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. 67 95 Bingham, T. The Rule of Law. Londres: Penguin, 2011. Birnie, P., Boyle, A. y Redgwell, C. International Law and the Environment. Oxford: oup, 2009. Boyle, A. y Chinkin, C. The Making of International Law. Oxford: oup, 2007. Brodie, M. Progressing Norm Socialisation: Why Membership Matters. The Impact of the Accreditation Process of the International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. En Nordic Journal of International Law. Vol. 80, n.º 2, 2011, 143-192. Cardenas, S. Emerging Global Actors: The United Nations and National Human Rights Institutions. En Global Governance. Vol. 9, n.º 1, 2003, 23-42. Cardenas, S. Chains of Justice: The Global Rise of State Institutions for Human Rights. Filadelfia: Penn, 2014. Carver, R. A New Answer to an Old Question: National Human Rights Institutions and the Domestication of International Law. En Human Rights Law Review. Vol. 10, n.º 1, 2010, 1-32. De Beco, G. y Murray, R. A Commentary on the Paris Principles on National Human Rights Institutions. Cambridge: cup, 2014. Domingo, R. Teoría de la “auctoritas”. Pamplona: eunsa, 1987. Domingo, R. Auctoritas. Barcelona: Ariel, 1999. Ellis, J. Shades of Grey: Soft Law and the Validity of Public International Law. En Leiden Journal of International Law. Vol. 25, n.º 2, 2012, 313-334. González Volio, L. The Institution of the Ombudsman. The Latin American Experience. En Revista Iidh. Vol. 37, 2003, 219-248. Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. National Human Rights Institutions, State Compliance, and Social Change. En Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. (eds.), Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Nueva York: cup, 2012, 1-28. Heuschling, L. Etat de droit - Rechtsstaat - Rule of Law. París: Dalloz, 2002. Kjærum, M. National Human Rights Institutions: Implementing Human Rights. Copenhague: dihr, 2003. Koo, J-W. y Ramirez, F. National Incorporation of Global Human Rights: Worldwide Expansion of National Human Rights Institutions, 1966-2004. En Social Forces. Vol. 87, n.º 3, 2009, 1321-1354. Kumar, R. National Human Rights Institutions: Good Governance Perspectives on Institutionalization of Human Rights. En American University International Law Review. Vol. 19, n.º 2, 2003, 259-300. Lindsnaes, B. y Lindholt, L. National Human Rights Institutions: Standard-Setting and Achievements. En Lindsnaes, B., Lindholt, L. y Yigen, K. (eds.), National Human Rights Institutions: Articles and Working Papers. Copenhague: Danish Institute for Human Rights, 2000, 1-48. Linos, K. y Pegram, T. Architects of their Own Making: National Human Rights Institutions and the United Nations. En Human Rights Quarterly. Vol. 38, n.º 4, 2016, 1109-1134. Linos, K. y Pegram, T. The Language of Compromise in International Agreements. En International Organization. Vol. 70, n.º 3, 2016, 587-621. Linos, K. y Pegram, T. What Works in Human Rights Institutions? En American Journal of International Law. Vol. 111, n.º 3, 2017, 628-688. Mertus, J. Evaluating nhris: Considering Structure, Mandate, and Impact. En Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. (eds.), Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Cambridge: cup, 2012, 74-92. Meuwissen, K. nhris and the State: New and Independent Actors in the Multi-layered Human Rights System? En Human Rights Law Review. Vol. 15, n.º 3, 2015, 441-484. Meyer, D. National Human Rights Institutions, Opportunities, and Activism. En Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. (eds.), Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Cambridge: cup, 2012, 324-334. Moreno E. y Witmer, R. The Power of the Pen: Human Rights Ombudsmen and Personal Integrity Violations in Latin America, 1982-2006. En Human Rights Review. Vol. 17, n.º 2, 2016, 143-164. Murray, R. National Human Rights Institutions. Criteria and Factors for Assessing their Effectiveness. En Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights. Vol. 25, n.º 2, 2007, 189-220. Nowak, M. National Human Rights Institutions in Europe: Comparative, European and International Perspectives. En Wouters, J. y Meuwissen, K. (eds.), National Human Rights Institutions in Europe: Comparative, European and International Perspectives. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2013, 13-26. ONU. National Human Rights Institutions: A Handbook on the Establishment and Strengthening of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Nueva York y Ginebra: ONU, 1995. Pegram, T. Diffusion across Political Systems: The Global Spread of National Human Rights Institutions. En Human Rights Quarterly. Vol. 32, n.º 2, 2010, 729-760. Pegram, T. y Herrera, N. Bridging the Gap: National Human Rights Institutions and the Inter-American Human Rights System. En Engstrom. P. (ed.), The Inter-American Human Rights System: Impact Beyond Compliance. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 167-198. Pohjolainen, A-E. The Evolution of National Human Rights Institutions: The Role of the United Nations. Copenhague: Danish Institute for Human Rights, 2006. Reif, L. Building Democratic Institutions: The Role of National Human Rights Institutions in Good Governance and Human Rights Protection. En Harvard Human Rights Journal. Vol. 13, 2000, 1-72. Reif, L. The Ombudsman, Good Governance and the International Human Rights System. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004. Reif, L. The Shifting Boundaries of nhri Definition in the International System. En Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. (eds.), Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Nueva York: cup, 2012, 52-73. Reif, L. Review of the Book “Chains of Justice: The Global Rise of State Institutions for Human Rights” by Sandra Cardenas (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014). En Human Rights Law Review. Vol. 15, n.º 1, 2015, 188-189. Rosenblum, P. Tainted Origins and Uncertain Outcomes: Evaluating nhris. En Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. (eds.), Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Cambridge: cup, 2012, 297-323. Sidoti, C. National Human Rights Institutions and the International Human Rights System. En Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. (eds.). Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Cambridge: cup, 2012, 93-123. Uggla, F. The Ombusdman in Latin America. En Journal of Latin American Studies. Vol. 36, 2004, 423-450. Villegas, C. La preeminencia del derecho en derecho internacional. Cizur Menor: Aranzadi, 2013. Waldron, J. Are Sovereigns Entitled to the Benefit of the International Rule of Law? En European Journal of International Law. Vol. 22, n.º 2, 2011, 315-343. Waldron, J. The Rule of Law and the Measure of Property. Cambridge: cup, 2012. Wouters J. y Meuwissen K. National Human Rights Institutions in Europe: An Introduction. En Wouters, J. y Meuwissen, K. (eds.), National Human Rights Institutions in Europe: Comparative, European and International Perspectives. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2013, 1-12 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7797/13187 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7797/13188 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7797/13189 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista Derecho del Estado |
| title |
Los Principios de París y las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos en América Latina |
| spellingShingle |
Los Principios de París y las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos en América Latina López Escarcena, Sebastián Ombuds offices, human rights commissions, human rights institutes, Paris Principles, institutional accreditation Defensorías del pueblo, comisiones de derechos humanos, institutos de derechos humanos, Principios de París, acreditación institucional |
| title_short |
Los Principios de París y las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos en América Latina |
| title_full |
Los Principios de París y las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos en América Latina |
| title_fullStr |
Los Principios de París y las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos en América Latina |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Los Principios de París y las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos en América Latina |
| title_sort |
los principios de parís y las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos en américa latina |
| title_eng |
Paris Principles and National Human Rights Institutions in Latin America |
| description |
Los Principios de París proveen los parámetros a través los cuales se miden las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos, en el importante proceso de acreditación que administra la red internacional que hoy las agrupa. Por su origen, dichos principios privilegian como modelo institucional a la comisión de derechos humanos sobre el ombudsman y el instituto de derechos humanos, y se centran en la creación de estas instituciones, más que en su posterior funcionamiento. Estos dos aspectos constituyen una limitante de dichos principios. Aun cuando el primero de estos problemas ha sido superado en la práctica, el segundo se mantiene plenamente vigente, por lo que sería conveniente identificar criterios de eficiencia que vayan más allá del diseño institucional y orienten a las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos en el cumplimiento efectivo de sus funciones. En el caso de América Latina, es esencial velar por la integración de estas instituciones para el logro de dicho objetivo. Solo contando con un personal adecuado pueden estas persuadir e influir no solo a los órganos estatales, sino también a la sociedad civil, promoviendo y protegiendo así los derechos humanos de todos.
|
| description_eng |
The Paris Principles are the benchmark against which national human rights institutions are measured in the important accreditation process managed by the international network that groups them today. Because of their origin, these principles favour the human rights commission as institutional model over the ombudsman and the human rights institute, and focuses on the creation of these institutions, rather than in their subsequent operation. These two aspects constitute a limitation to such principles. Even though the first of these problems has been solved in practice, the second one remains a reality that requires identifying criteria of efficiency going beyond institutional design and guiding national human rights institutions in the effective fulfilment of their functions. In the case of Latin America, it is essential not to lose sight of the integration of these institutions to achieve this goal. Only with adequate personnel they can persuade and influence not only state organs, but also civil society, thus promoting and protecting the human rights of all.
|
| author |
López Escarcena, Sebastián |
| author_facet |
López Escarcena, Sebastián |
| topic |
Ombuds offices, human rights commissions, human rights institutes, Paris Principles, institutional accreditation Defensorías del pueblo, comisiones de derechos humanos, institutos de derechos humanos, Principios de París, acreditación institucional |
| topic_facet |
Ombuds offices, human rights commissions, human rights institutes, Paris Principles, institutional accreditation Defensorías del pueblo, comisiones de derechos humanos, institutos de derechos humanos, Principios de París, acreditación institucional |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Defensorías del pueblo, comisiones de derechos humanos, institutos de derechos humanos, Principios de París, acreditación institucional |
| citationissue |
52 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 52 , Año 2022 : Mayo - Agosto |
| publisher |
Departamento de Derecho Constitucional |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista Derecho del Estado |
| source |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/7797 |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Sebastián López Escarcena - 2022 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references |
Bingham, T. The Rule of Law. Londres: Penguin, 2011. Birnie, P., Boyle, A. y Redgwell, C. International Law and the Environment. Oxford: oup, 2009. Boyle, A. y Chinkin, C. The Making of International Law. Oxford: oup, 2007. Brodie, M. Progressing Norm Socialisation: Why Membership Matters. The Impact of the Accreditation Process of the International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. En Nordic Journal of International Law. Vol. 80, n.º 2, 2011, 143-192. Cardenas, S. Emerging Global Actors: The United Nations and National Human Rights Institutions. En Global Governance. Vol. 9, n.º 1, 2003, 23-42. Cardenas, S. Chains of Justice: The Global Rise of State Institutions for Human Rights. Filadelfia: Penn, 2014. Carver, R. A New Answer to an Old Question: National Human Rights Institutions and the Domestication of International Law. En Human Rights Law Review. Vol. 10, n.º 1, 2010, 1-32. De Beco, G. y Murray, R. A Commentary on the Paris Principles on National Human Rights Institutions. Cambridge: cup, 2014. Domingo, R. Teoría de la “auctoritas”. Pamplona: eunsa, 1987. Domingo, R. Auctoritas. Barcelona: Ariel, 1999. Ellis, J. Shades of Grey: Soft Law and the Validity of Public International Law. En Leiden Journal of International Law. Vol. 25, n.º 2, 2012, 313-334. González Volio, L. The Institution of the Ombudsman. The Latin American Experience. En Revista Iidh. Vol. 37, 2003, 219-248. Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. National Human Rights Institutions, State Compliance, and Social Change. En Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. (eds.), Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Nueva York: cup, 2012, 1-28. Heuschling, L. Etat de droit - Rechtsstaat - Rule of Law. París: Dalloz, 2002. Kjærum, M. National Human Rights Institutions: Implementing Human Rights. Copenhague: dihr, 2003. Koo, J-W. y Ramirez, F. National Incorporation of Global Human Rights: Worldwide Expansion of National Human Rights Institutions, 1966-2004. En Social Forces. Vol. 87, n.º 3, 2009, 1321-1354. Kumar, R. National Human Rights Institutions: Good Governance Perspectives on Institutionalization of Human Rights. En American University International Law Review. Vol. 19, n.º 2, 2003, 259-300. Lindsnaes, B. y Lindholt, L. National Human Rights Institutions: Standard-Setting and Achievements. En Lindsnaes, B., Lindholt, L. y Yigen, K. (eds.), National Human Rights Institutions: Articles and Working Papers. Copenhague: Danish Institute for Human Rights, 2000, 1-48. Linos, K. y Pegram, T. Architects of their Own Making: National Human Rights Institutions and the United Nations. En Human Rights Quarterly. Vol. 38, n.º 4, 2016, 1109-1134. Linos, K. y Pegram, T. The Language of Compromise in International Agreements. En International Organization. Vol. 70, n.º 3, 2016, 587-621. Linos, K. y Pegram, T. What Works in Human Rights Institutions? En American Journal of International Law. Vol. 111, n.º 3, 2017, 628-688. Mertus, J. Evaluating nhris: Considering Structure, Mandate, and Impact. En Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. (eds.), Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Cambridge: cup, 2012, 74-92. Meuwissen, K. nhris and the State: New and Independent Actors in the Multi-layered Human Rights System? En Human Rights Law Review. Vol. 15, n.º 3, 2015, 441-484. Meyer, D. National Human Rights Institutions, Opportunities, and Activism. En Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. (eds.), Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Cambridge: cup, 2012, 324-334. Moreno E. y Witmer, R. The Power of the Pen: Human Rights Ombudsmen and Personal Integrity Violations in Latin America, 1982-2006. En Human Rights Review. Vol. 17, n.º 2, 2016, 143-164. Murray, R. National Human Rights Institutions. Criteria and Factors for Assessing their Effectiveness. En Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights. Vol. 25, n.º 2, 2007, 189-220. Nowak, M. National Human Rights Institutions in Europe: Comparative, European and International Perspectives. En Wouters, J. y Meuwissen, K. (eds.), National Human Rights Institutions in Europe: Comparative, European and International Perspectives. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2013, 13-26. ONU. National Human Rights Institutions: A Handbook on the Establishment and Strengthening of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Nueva York y Ginebra: ONU, 1995. Pegram, T. Diffusion across Political Systems: The Global Spread of National Human Rights Institutions. En Human Rights Quarterly. Vol. 32, n.º 2, 2010, 729-760. Pegram, T. y Herrera, N. Bridging the Gap: National Human Rights Institutions and the Inter-American Human Rights System. En Engstrom. P. (ed.), The Inter-American Human Rights System: Impact Beyond Compliance. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 167-198. Pohjolainen, A-E. The Evolution of National Human Rights Institutions: The Role of the United Nations. Copenhague: Danish Institute for Human Rights, 2006. Reif, L. Building Democratic Institutions: The Role of National Human Rights Institutions in Good Governance and Human Rights Protection. En Harvard Human Rights Journal. Vol. 13, 2000, 1-72. Reif, L. The Ombudsman, Good Governance and the International Human Rights System. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004. Reif, L. The Shifting Boundaries of nhri Definition in the International System. En Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. (eds.), Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Nueva York: cup, 2012, 52-73. Reif, L. Review of the Book “Chains of Justice: The Global Rise of State Institutions for Human Rights” by Sandra Cardenas (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014). En Human Rights Law Review. Vol. 15, n.º 1, 2015, 188-189. Rosenblum, P. Tainted Origins and Uncertain Outcomes: Evaluating nhris. En Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. (eds.), Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Cambridge: cup, 2012, 297-323. Sidoti, C. National Human Rights Institutions and the International Human Rights System. En Goodman, R. y Pegram, T. (eds.). Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Cambridge: cup, 2012, 93-123. Uggla, F. The Ombusdman in Latin America. En Journal of Latin American Studies. Vol. 36, 2004, 423-450. Villegas, C. La preeminencia del derecho en derecho internacional. Cizur Menor: Aranzadi, 2013. Waldron, J. Are Sovereigns Entitled to the Benefit of the International Rule of Law? En European Journal of International Law. Vol. 22, n.º 2, 2011, 315-343. Waldron, J. The Rule of Law and the Measure of Property. Cambridge: cup, 2012. Wouters J. y Meuwissen K. National Human Rights Institutions in Europe: An Introduction. En Wouters, J. y Meuwissen, K. (eds.), National Human Rights Institutions in Europe: Comparative, European and International Perspectives. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2013, 1-12 |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2022-04-28 |
| date_accessioned |
2022-04-28T10:28:55Z |
| date_available |
2022-04-28T10:28:55Z |
| url |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/7797 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n52.03 |
| issn |
0122-9893 |
| eissn |
2346-2051 |
| doi |
10.18601/01229893.n52.03 |
| citationstartpage |
67 |
| citationendpage |
95 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7797/13187 |
| url3_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7797/13188 |
| url4_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7797/13189 |
| _version_ |
1811199908192976896 |