Titulo:
Constitutional Justice of Russia within the judicial landscape of contemporary Europe
.
Sumario:
The Russian Federation became a member of the Council of Europe in 1996. This step determined the development of Russia’s judicial system for the coming several decades and made it possible for Russia’s national system of law to integrate into judicial landscape of Europe, thereby enabling Russia to uphold democratic values. The emergence of new legislation affected all branches of Russia’s system of law. But the experience of the two decades has demonstrated that such modernization can be effective only by way of dialogue rather than by simple copying and implementing international rules. An important role in this process was played by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (RF) that was founded in 1991. The paper reviews the r... Ver más
Guardado en:
0122-9893
2346-2051
2017-12-13
21
44
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
metarevistapublica_uexternado_revistaderechodelestado_81_article_5216 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Constitutional Justice of Russia within the judicial landscape of contemporary Europe Constitutional Justice of Russia within the judicial landscape of contemporary Europe The Russian Federation became a member of the Council of Europe in 1996. This step determined the development of Russia’s judicial system for the coming several decades and made it possible for Russia’s national system of law to integrate into judicial landscape of Europe, thereby enabling Russia to uphold democratic values. The emergence of new legislation affected all branches of Russia’s system of law. But the experience of the two decades has demonstrated that such modernization can be effective only by way of dialogue rather than by simple copying and implementing international rules. An important role in this process was played by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (RF) that was founded in 1991. The paper reviews the role it played in the 1993 Constitutional crisis, examines the Court’s structure and powers, and also analyzes the juridical nature of its decisions. The Author analyzes the collisions between decisions handed down by the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitution of Russia from the point of view of the stand taken by the Constitutional Court of the RF. In the¿ end, the Author arrives at the conclusion that there is a need for a dialogue among European and national systems of justice with the help of filtration mechanisms and multilevel constitutionalism. The Russian Federation became a member of the Council of Europe in 1996. This step determined the development of Russia’s judicial system for the coming several decades and made it possible for Russia’s national system of law to integrate into judicial landscape of Europe, thereby enabling Russia to uphold democratic values. The emergence of new legislation affected all branches of Russia’s system of law. But the experience of the two decades has demonstrated that such modernization can be effective only by way of dialogue rather than by simple copying and implementing international rules. An important role in this process was played by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (RF) that was founded in 1991. The paper reviews the role it played in the 1993 Constitutional crisis, examines the Court’s structure and powers, and also analyzes the juridical nature of its decisions. The Author analyzes the collisions between decisions handed down by the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitution of Russia from the point of view of the stand taken by the Constitutional Court of the RF. In the¿ end, the Author arrives at the conclusion that there is a need for a dialogue among European and national systems of justice with the help of filtration mechanisms and multilevel constitutionalism Abramova, Marianna Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation decisions European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) European Conventional Law democratic values human rights collisions implementation filtration multilevel constitutionalism. Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation decisions European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) European Conventional Law democratic values human rights collisions implementation filtration multilevel constitutionalism. 40 Núm. 40 , Año 2018 : Enero-Junio Artículo de revista Journal article 2017-12-13T00:00:00Z 2017-12-13T00:00:00Z 2017-12-13 application/pdf text/html application/xml Departamento de Derecho Constitucional Revista Derecho del Estado 0122-9893 2346-2051 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/5216 10.18601/01229893.n40.02 https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n40.02 spa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ 21 44 Acosta Alvarado, P. A. (2015). El diálogo judicial interamericano, un camino de doble vía hacia la protección efectiva. Diálogo entre cortes. Luiz Arcaro Conci y Luca Mezzetti (eds.). Brasilia: oab. Acosta Alvarado, P. A. (2014). Diálogo judicial y constitucionalismo multinivel. El caso de la red judicial latinoamericana. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia. Alekseyev, S. S. (2017). The State and Law. Moscow: Prospekt. Baglai, M. V. (1989). A Law-governed State: From ideas to practice. Kommunist. 6, 20-29. Bondar, S. N. (2016). Value-based origins of legal implementation of Convention requirements for Russia’s legal system. Journal of Constitutional Justice. 2 (50), 4-10. Colton, T. (2013). Yeltsin. Moscow: Colibry. Fyodorov , B. G. (2011). Ten Mad Days with Boris Yeltsin. Moscow: Algorithm. Kalinichenko, P. A. (2016). On the question of collision between echr Acts and Russian Constitutional Acts from the point of view of principles of the RF Constitutional Court. Timely Problems of Russian Law. 2, 42-48. Konyukhov a, I. A. (2010). Tendencies, problems and prospects of harmonizing Constitutional Law and International Public Law in conditions of present-day development. Constitutional Law and International Law in contemporary times. Moscow: rap. Maliushin, A. A. (2015). Forms of performing law-making function of the constitutional legislation and their place in the hierarchy of the sources of the Russian Law. Law Problems, 10, 59-64. Marchenko, M. N. (2016). Juridical nature and character of the of the European Court on Human Right’s (echr) decisions. Moscow State University Vestnik (Law), 2, 3-20. Nersesyantz, V. S. (1997). The court does not make laws, neither does it govern – It applies laws. Judicial practice as a source of law. Moscow. Ostapovich, I. Y. (2010). Constitutional Court of RF in normative forming process. Russian Juridical Journal. 133-138. Solovyov a, T. A. (2011). Acts issues by Supreme Court of RF, Constitutional Court of RF and European Court on Human Rights in the sphere of civil law and the procedure of their implementation. O. V. Isayenkov a (ed.). Moscow: Monograph. Strashun, B. A. (2000). Decisions of RF Constitutional Court as a source of law. Moscow: Norma. Tanchev, T. (2014). Constitutional pluralism and multilevel governance in the European Union. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law Studies. 6 (49), 1052-1062. Vitruk, N. V. (2001). Constitutional Justice in Russia (1991-2001). Notes on Theory and Practice. Moscow: Gorodets-Izdat. Volkov a, N. S. and Habrieva, T. Y. (2005). Legal Principles of Constitutional Court of RF and Parliament. Moscow: Norma. Zorkin, V. D. (2011). Constitutional Development of Russia. Moscow: Norma. Zorkin, V. D. (2010). Contemporary World, Law and the Constitution. Moscow: Norma. https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5216/6283 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5216/6369 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5216/6588 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista Derecho del Estado |
| title |
Constitutional Justice of Russia within the judicial landscape of contemporary Europe |
| spellingShingle |
Constitutional Justice of Russia within the judicial landscape of contemporary Europe Abramova, Marianna Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation decisions European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) European Conventional Law democratic values human rights collisions implementation filtration multilevel constitutionalism. Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation decisions European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) European Conventional Law democratic values human rights collisions implementation filtration multilevel constitutionalism. |
| title_short |
Constitutional Justice of Russia within the judicial landscape of contemporary Europe |
| title_full |
Constitutional Justice of Russia within the judicial landscape of contemporary Europe |
| title_fullStr |
Constitutional Justice of Russia within the judicial landscape of contemporary Europe |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Constitutional Justice of Russia within the judicial landscape of contemporary Europe |
| title_sort |
constitutional justice of russia within the judicial landscape of contemporary europe |
| title_eng |
Constitutional Justice of Russia within the judicial landscape of contemporary Europe |
| description |
The Russian Federation became a member of the Council of Europe in 1996. This step determined the development of Russia’s judicial system for the coming several decades and made it possible for Russia’s national system of law to integrate into judicial landscape of Europe, thereby enabling Russia to uphold democratic values. The emergence of new legislation affected all branches of Russia’s system of law. But the experience of the two decades has demonstrated that such modernization can be effective only by way of dialogue rather than by simple copying and implementing international rules. An important role in this process was played by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (RF) that was founded in 1991. The paper reviews the role it played in the 1993 Constitutional crisis, examines the Court’s structure and powers, and also analyzes the juridical nature of its decisions. The Author analyzes the collisions between decisions handed down by the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitution of Russia from the point of view of the stand taken by the Constitutional Court of the RF. In the¿ end, the Author arrives at the conclusion that there is a need for a dialogue among European and national systems of justice with the help of filtration mechanisms and multilevel constitutionalism.
|
| description_eng |
The Russian Federation became a member of the Council of Europe in 1996. This step determined the development of Russia’s judicial system for the coming several decades and made it possible for Russia’s national system of law to integrate into judicial landscape of Europe, thereby enabling Russia to uphold democratic values. The emergence of new legislation affected all branches of Russia’s system of law. But the experience of the two decades has demonstrated that such modernization can be effective only by way of dialogue rather than by simple copying and implementing international rules. An important role in this process was played by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (RF) that was founded in 1991. The paper reviews the role it played in the 1993 Constitutional crisis, examines the Court’s structure and powers, and also analyzes the juridical nature of its decisions. The Author analyzes the collisions between decisions handed down by the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitution of Russia from the point of view of the stand taken by the Constitutional Court of the RF. In the¿ end, the Author arrives at the conclusion that there is a need for a dialogue among European and national systems of justice with the help of filtration mechanisms and multilevel constitutionalism
|
| author |
Abramova, Marianna |
| author_facet |
Abramova, Marianna |
| topic |
Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation decisions European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) European Conventional Law democratic values human rights collisions implementation filtration multilevel constitutionalism. Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation decisions European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) European Conventional Law democratic values human rights collisions implementation filtration multilevel constitutionalism. |
| topic_facet |
Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation decisions European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) European Conventional Law democratic values human rights collisions implementation filtration multilevel constitutionalism. Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation decisions European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) European Conventional Law democratic values human rights collisions implementation filtration multilevel constitutionalism. |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation decisions European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) European Conventional Law democratic values human rights collisions implementation filtration multilevel constitutionalism. |
| citationissue |
40 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 40 , Año 2018 : Enero-Junio |
| publisher |
Departamento de Derecho Constitucional |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista Derecho del Estado |
| source |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/5216 |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references |
Acosta Alvarado, P. A. (2015). El diálogo judicial interamericano, un camino de doble vía hacia la protección efectiva. Diálogo entre cortes. Luiz Arcaro Conci y Luca Mezzetti (eds.). Brasilia: oab. Acosta Alvarado, P. A. (2014). Diálogo judicial y constitucionalismo multinivel. El caso de la red judicial latinoamericana. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia. Alekseyev, S. S. (2017). The State and Law. Moscow: Prospekt. Baglai, M. V. (1989). A Law-governed State: From ideas to practice. Kommunist. 6, 20-29. Bondar, S. N. (2016). Value-based origins of legal implementation of Convention requirements for Russia’s legal system. Journal of Constitutional Justice. 2 (50), 4-10. Colton, T. (2013). Yeltsin. Moscow: Colibry. Fyodorov , B. G. (2011). Ten Mad Days with Boris Yeltsin. Moscow: Algorithm. Kalinichenko, P. A. (2016). On the question of collision between echr Acts and Russian Constitutional Acts from the point of view of principles of the RF Constitutional Court. Timely Problems of Russian Law. 2, 42-48. Konyukhov a, I. A. (2010). Tendencies, problems and prospects of harmonizing Constitutional Law and International Public Law in conditions of present-day development. Constitutional Law and International Law in contemporary times. Moscow: rap. Maliushin, A. A. (2015). Forms of performing law-making function of the constitutional legislation and their place in the hierarchy of the sources of the Russian Law. Law Problems, 10, 59-64. Marchenko, M. N. (2016). Juridical nature and character of the of the European Court on Human Right’s (echr) decisions. Moscow State University Vestnik (Law), 2, 3-20. Nersesyantz, V. S. (1997). The court does not make laws, neither does it govern – It applies laws. Judicial practice as a source of law. Moscow. Ostapovich, I. Y. (2010). Constitutional Court of RF in normative forming process. Russian Juridical Journal. 133-138. Solovyov a, T. A. (2011). Acts issues by Supreme Court of RF, Constitutional Court of RF and European Court on Human Rights in the sphere of civil law and the procedure of their implementation. O. V. Isayenkov a (ed.). Moscow: Monograph. Strashun, B. A. (2000). Decisions of RF Constitutional Court as a source of law. Moscow: Norma. Tanchev, T. (2014). Constitutional pluralism and multilevel governance in the European Union. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law Studies. 6 (49), 1052-1062. Vitruk, N. V. (2001). Constitutional Justice in Russia (1991-2001). Notes on Theory and Practice. Moscow: Gorodets-Izdat. Volkov a, N. S. and Habrieva, T. Y. (2005). Legal Principles of Constitutional Court of RF and Parliament. Moscow: Norma. Zorkin, V. D. (2011). Constitutional Development of Russia. Moscow: Norma. Zorkin, V. D. (2010). Contemporary World, Law and the Constitution. Moscow: Norma. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2017-12-13 |
| date_accessioned |
2017-12-13T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2017-12-13T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/5216 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n40.02 |
| issn |
0122-9893 |
| eissn |
2346-2051 |
| doi |
10.18601/01229893.n40.02 |
| citationstartpage |
21 |
| citationendpage |
44 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5216/6283 |
| url3_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5216/6369 |
| url4_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5216/6588 |
| _version_ |
1811199892397228032 |