Titulo:
Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad
.
Sumario:
En una economía de mercado, los precios de los bienes no necesariamente reflejan los derechos de propiedad de los factores productivos que agregan valor. Si la captura de la renta de la tierra agrícola fue ilegítima desde la economía clásica, la renta de la tierra urbana lo es aún más. Si la fertilidad era una cualidad natural del suelo, el propietario no aportaba nada adicional; en una economía urbana moderna, la “fertilidad” del suelo de un predio urbano proviene de la aglomeración. Los derechos de propiedad y de edificabilidad están inmersos, pero es evidente que este último es exógeno: la colectividad lo asigna o redefine, puesto que el interés individual no puede sobreponerse al interés de la sociedad. Entonces, ¿de dónde proviene el d... Ver más
Guardado en:
0124-5996
2346-2450
27
2024-12-04
319
340
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Alex Smith Araque Solano - 2024
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
| id |
metarevistapublica_uexternado_revistadeeconomiainstitucional_17-article-10061 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad Henderson, V., & Becker, R. (2000). Political economy of city sizes and formation. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(3), 453–484. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2000.2176 Nelson, R. H. (1979). A private property right theory of zoning. The Urban Lawyer, 11(4), 713–732. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27890908 Molotch, H. L. (1976). The city as a growth machine. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881096 Mill, J. S. (2009 [1848]). The principles of political economy: With some of their applications to social philosophy. D. Appleton and Company. Marshall, A. (1961). Principles of economics (9ª ed.). Macmillan. Marx, K. (1975). El capital. Tomo 1. El proceso de producción del capital (1ª ed., Vol. 2). Siglo XXI Editores. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763 Klimovsky, E. A. (2006). Tasas de ganancia, acumulación, producción y circulación: Los conceptos básicos de la teoría clásica del valor. Cuadernos de Economía, 25(44), 33–55. Kang, H. Y. (2023). Patents as capitalist aesthetic forms. Law and Critique. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-023-09349-2 Ingram, G., & Hong, Y. (Eds.). (2012). Value capture and land policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Ingram, G., & Hong, Y. (Eds.). (2010). Municipal revenues and land policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Hortas-Rico, M. (2014). Urban sprawl and municipal budgets in Spain: A dynamic panel data analysis. Journal of the Regional Science Association International, 93(4), 843–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12022 Hortas-Rico, M., & Solé-Ollé, A. (2010). Does urban sprawl increase the costs of providing local public services? Evidence from Spanish municipalities. Urban Studies, 47(7), 1513–1540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009353620 Grieson, R. E., & White, J. R. (1981). The effects of zoning on structure and land markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 10(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(81)90001-2 Ricardo, D. (1973). Principios de economía política y tributación. Fondo de Cultura Económica. Grether, D. M., & Mieszkowski, P. (1980). The effects of nonresidential land uses on the prices of adjacent housing: Some estimates of proximity effects. Journal of Urban Economics, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(80)90052-2 Glaeser, E. (2012). Urban public finance (NBER Working Paper No. 18244). National Bureau of Economic Research. Recuperado de https://www.nber.org/papers/w18244.pdf Glaeser, E., & Gottlieb, J. (2009). The wealth of cities: Agglomeration economies and spatial equilibrium in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), 983-1028. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.4.983 Glaeser, E. L., & Ward, B. A. (2009). The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.06.003 George, H. (1879). Progress and poverty. Recuperado de http://bit.ly/2ilXYg9 Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. F. (2013). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth (2da ed.). Cambridge University Press. Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. F. (2002). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press. Fujita, M. (2012). Thünen and the new economic geography. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(6), 907-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.12.002 Fujita, M. (1989). Urban economic theory: Land use and city size. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625862 Flatters, F., Henderson, V., & Mieszkowsky, P. (1974). Public goods, efficiency, and regional fiscal equalization. Journal of Public Economics, 3(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(74)90028-0 Fischel, W. (2000). Zoning and land use regulation. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 403–442. Recuperado de http://www.dartmouth.edu/~wfischel/Papers/WAF-zoningELEpdf.pdf Ferguson, C. E., & Gould, J. P. (1975). Microeconomic theory (4ta ed.). R.D. Irwin. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. Rymanov, A. (2017). Differential land rent and agricultural taxation. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 63(9), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.17221/127/2016-AGRICECON Diwan, I., & Rodrik, D. (1991). Patents, appropriate technology, and North-South trade. Journal of International Economics, 30(1–2), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(91)90003-O Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424. Text http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Zouboulakis, M. (2016). Fundamentación de los derechos de propiedad: Clásicos y modernos. Revista de Economía Institucional, 18(34), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v18n34.02 Wheaton, W. (1993). Land capitalization, Tiebout mobility, and the role of zoning regulations. Journal of Urban Economics, 34(2), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1993.1029 Vickrey, W. (1977). The city as a firm. En M. S. Feldstein & R. P. Inman (Eds.), The economics of public services (pp. 334–343). Palgrave Macmillan. Thisse, J. F. (2014). The new science of cities by Michael Batty: The opinion of an economist. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(3), 805-819. Rosenthal, S., & Strange, W. C. (2004a). The micro-empirics of agglomeration economies. En R. Arnott & D. McMillen (Eds.), A companion to urban economics (pp. 7-53). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996225.ch1 Stiglitz, J. E. (1983). The theory of local public goods twenty–five years after Tiebout: A perspective. En G. Zodrow (Ed.), Local provision of public services (pp. 17–53). Academic Press. Stiglitz, J. E. (1981). Public goods in open economies with heterogeneous individuals. NBER Working Paper No. 802. Recuperado de https://www.nber.org/papers/w0802.pdf Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). The theory of local public goods. En M. S. Feldstein & R. P. Inman (Eds.), The economics of public services (pp. 274–333). Palgrave Macmillan. Starrett, D. (1978). Market allocations of location choice in a model with free mobility. Journal of Economic Theory, 17(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(78)90120-5 Sraffa, P. (1960). Production of commodities by means of commodities. Cambridge University Press. Smith, A. (2011). La riqueza de las naciones (Trad. C. Braun). Alianza Editorial. (Trabajo original publicado en 1776) Serkin, C. (2020). A case for zoning. Notre Dame Law Review, 96(2), 749–798. Recuperado de https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol96/iss2/6 Senior, N. W. (1836). An outline of the science of political economy. W. Clowes and Sons. Sen, A. (2000). Desarrollo y libertad. Editorial Planeta. Schwerhoff, G., Edenhofer, O., & Fleurbaey, M. (2022). Equity and efficiency effects of land value taxation. IMF Working Papers, WP/22/263. Recuperado de https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2022/12/17/Equity-and-Efficiency-Effects-of-Land-Value-Taxation-527079 Savini, F. (2016). Don’t blame public law: The legal articulation of certainty in Amsterdam land-use planning. Town Planning Review, 87(4), 459-479. Rosenthal, S., & Strange, W. (2004b). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. En J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics, 4, 2119-2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80006-3 Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2004). Microfoundations of urban agglomeration economies. En J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 2063-2117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1 Demsetz, H. (2008). Frischmann’s view of “Toward a theory of property rights”. Review of Law and Economics, 4(1), 127-132. Demsetz, H. (1964). The exchange and enforcement of property rights. Journal of Law and Economics, 7, 11-26. Núm. 52 , Año 2025 : Enero-Junio Alex Smith Araque Solano - 2024 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Español https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/10061 Revista de Economía Institucional Universidad Externado de Colombia application/pdf Artículo de revista 52 Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1973). The property right paradigm. The Journal of Economic History, 33(1), 16–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117138 27 Captura de valor Direitos de propriedade, Preços do solo urbano, Captura de valor Derechos de propiedad, Precios del suelo urbano, Araque Solano, Alex Smith En una economía de mercado, los precios de los bienes no necesariamente reflejan los derechos de propiedad de los factores productivos que agregan valor. Si la captura de la renta de la tierra agrícola fue ilegítima desde la economía clásica, la renta de la tierra urbana lo es aún más. Si la fertilidad era una cualidad natural del suelo, el propietario no aportaba nada adicional; en una economía urbana moderna, la “fertilidad” del suelo de un predio urbano proviene de la aglomeración. Los derechos de propiedad y de edificabilidad están inmersos, pero es evidente que este último es exógeno: la colectividad lo asigna o redefine, puesto que el interés individual no puede sobreponerse al interés de la sociedad. Entonces, ¿de dónde proviene el derecho a apropiarse del excedente colectivo implícito en el derecho a construir? La captación de rentas por parte de la comunidad permite financiar el desarrollo urbano, y su legitimidad deriva tanto de la fertilidad de la aglomeración como de la posibilidad de capitalizar cambios regulatorios en las ciudades. En este sentido, es necesario redefinir los acuerdos sociales para promover el avance del desarrollo. Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. Publication Alterman, R. (2012). Land-use regulations and property values: The “Windfalls capture” idea revisited. En N. Brooks, K. Donaghy, & G. J. Knaap (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban economics and planning (pp. 755-786). Oxford University Press. Bejarano, J. A. (1999). Los nuevos dominios de la ciencia económica. Cuadernos de Economía, 18(31), 78-91. Claessens, S., & Laeven, L. (2003). Financial development, property rights and growth. The Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2401–2436. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00610.x Che, S., Kumar, R. R., & Stauvermann, P. J. (2021). Taxation of land and economic growth. Economies, 9(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9020061 Brueckner, J., Thisse, J. F., & Zenou, Y. (1999). Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An amenity-based theory. European Economic Review, 43(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00019-1 Borner, S., Bodmer, F., & Kobler, M. (2004). Institutional efficiency and its determinants: The role of political factors in economic growth. OECD. Birch, K. (2020). Technoscience rent: Toward a theory of rentiership for technoscientific capitalism. Science, Technology & Human Values, 45(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919829567 Coriat, B., & Orsi, F. (2002). Establishing a new intellectual property rights regime in the United States: Origins, content and problems. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1491–1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00078-1 Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2016). Sentencia C-192/16, Bogotá, D.C.: 20 de abril de 2016. Recuperado de https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/RELATORIA/2016/C-192-16.htm Cuevas, H. (1996). El capital humano en el sistema de precios. Cuadernos de Economía, 15(24), 7–25. Benabou, R. (1993). Workings of a city: Location, education, and production. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 619-652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118403 Azcurra, F. H. (2014). Marx y Sraffa: Dos modalidades de hacer teoría económica científica. RED Sociales, 1, 19–28. Recuperado de http://fliphtml5.com/xqkd/jvyo Cordes, M. W. (1999). Property rights and land use controls: Balancing private and public interest. North Illinois University Law Review, 19. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2803580 Asabere, P. K., & Colwell, P. F. (1984). Zoning and the value of urban land. Real Estate Issues, 9(1), 22–27. Davis, O. A. (1963). Economic elements in municipal zoning decisions. Land Economics, 39(4), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/3144842 Arnott, R. (2004). Does the Henry George theorem provide a practical guide to optimal city size? The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63(5), 1057-1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2004.00334.x Arnott, R., & Stiglitz, J. (1979). Aggregate land rent, expenditure on public goods, and optimal city size. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(4), 471-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884466 Arnott, R. (1979). Optimal city size in a spatial economy. Journal of Urban Economics, 6(1), 65-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(79)90017-2 Araque, A., Cantor, L., & Moreno, P. (2022). Norma y precio del suelo urbano en la ciudad de Bogotá. Revista EURE - Revista de Estudios Urbano Regionales, 48(143). https://doi.org/10.7764/EURE.48.143.13 Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57(2), 347-359. Coase, R. (1991, diciembre). Prize lecture: The institutional structure of production. Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel. Recuperado de https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1991/coase/lecture/ Property rights, Urban land prices, Value Capture In a market economy, the prices of goods do not necessarily reflect the property rights of the productive factors that add value. If the capture of agricultural land rent was illegitimate from the perspective of classical economics, urban land rent is even more so. While the fertility of agricultural land was a natural quality, the owner contributed nothing additional; in a modern urban economy, the “fertility” of an urban plot of land comes from agglomeration. Property and building rights are embedded, but it is evident that the latter is exogenous: the community assigns or redefines it, as individual interest cannot prevail over the interest of society. Thus, where does the right to appropriate the collective surplus implicit in the right to build come from? The community’s capture of rents allows the financing of urban development, and its legitimacy derives from both the fertility of agglomeration and the ability to capitalize on regulatory changes in cities. In this sense, it is necessary to redefine social agreements to promote development progress. Journal article Urban Land Prices, Value Aggregation, and Property Rights 340 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/10061/17157 2024-12-04T15:17:53Z 2024-12-04T15:17:53Z 2024-12-04 0124-5996 2346-2450 10.18601/01245996.v27n52.11 319 https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v27n52.11 |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD EXTERNADO DE COLOMBIA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADEXTERNADODECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista de Economía Institucional |
| title |
Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad |
| spellingShingle |
Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad Araque Solano, Alex Smith Captura de valor Direitos de propriedade, Preços do solo urbano, Captura de valor Derechos de propiedad, Precios del suelo urbano, Property rights, Urban land prices, Value Capture |
| title_short |
Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad |
| title_full |
Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad |
| title_fullStr |
Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad |
| title_sort |
los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad |
| title_eng |
Urban Land Prices, Value Aggregation, and Property Rights |
| description |
En una economía de mercado, los precios de los bienes no necesariamente reflejan los derechos de propiedad de los factores productivos que agregan valor. Si la captura de la renta de la tierra agrícola fue ilegítima desde la economía clásica, la renta de la tierra urbana lo es aún más. Si la fertilidad era una cualidad natural del suelo, el propietario no aportaba nada adicional; en una economía urbana moderna, la “fertilidad” del suelo de un predio urbano proviene de la aglomeración. Los derechos de propiedad y de edificabilidad están inmersos, pero es evidente que este último es exógeno: la colectividad lo asigna o redefine, puesto que el interés individual no puede sobreponerse al interés de la sociedad. Entonces, ¿de dónde proviene el derecho a apropiarse del excedente colectivo implícito en el derecho a construir? La captación de rentas por parte de la comunidad permite financiar el desarrollo urbano, y su legitimidad deriva tanto de la fertilidad de la aglomeración como de la posibilidad de capitalizar cambios regulatorios en las ciudades. En este sentido, es necesario redefinir los acuerdos sociales para promover el avance del desarrollo.
|
| description_eng |
In a market economy, the prices of goods do not necessarily reflect the property rights of the productive factors that add value. If the capture of agricultural land rent was illegitimate from the perspective of classical economics, urban land rent is even more so. While the fertility of agricultural land was a natural quality, the owner contributed nothing additional; in a modern urban economy, the “fertility” of an urban plot of land comes from agglomeration. Property and building rights are embedded, but it is evident that the latter is exogenous: the community assigns or redefines it, as individual interest cannot prevail over the interest of society. Thus, where does the right to appropriate the collective surplus implicit in the right to build come from? The community’s capture of rents allows the financing of urban development, and its legitimacy derives from both the fertility of agglomeration and the ability to capitalize on regulatory changes in cities. In this sense, it is necessary to redefine social agreements to promote development progress.
|
| author |
Araque Solano, Alex Smith |
| author_facet |
Araque Solano, Alex Smith |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Captura de valor Direitos de propriedade, Preços do solo urbano, Captura de valor Derechos de propiedad, Precios del suelo urbano, |
| topic |
Captura de valor Direitos de propriedade, Preços do solo urbano, Captura de valor Derechos de propiedad, Precios del suelo urbano, Property rights, Urban land prices, Value Capture |
| topic_facet |
Captura de valor Direitos de propriedade, Preços do solo urbano, Captura de valor Derechos de propiedad, Precios del suelo urbano, Property rights, Urban land prices, Value Capture |
| citationvolume |
27 |
| citationissue |
52 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 52 , Año 2025 : Enero-Junio |
| publisher |
Universidad Externado de Colombia |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista de Economía Institucional |
| source |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/10061 |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Alex Smith Araque Solano - 2024 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. |
| references |
Henderson, V., & Becker, R. (2000). Political economy of city sizes and formation. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(3), 453–484. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2000.2176 Nelson, R. H. (1979). A private property right theory of zoning. The Urban Lawyer, 11(4), 713–732. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27890908 Molotch, H. L. (1976). The city as a growth machine. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881096 Mill, J. S. (2009 [1848]). The principles of political economy: With some of their applications to social philosophy. D. Appleton and Company. Marshall, A. (1961). Principles of economics (9ª ed.). Macmillan. Marx, K. (1975). El capital. Tomo 1. El proceso de producción del capital (1ª ed., Vol. 2). Siglo XXI Editores. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763 Klimovsky, E. A. (2006). Tasas de ganancia, acumulación, producción y circulación: Los conceptos básicos de la teoría clásica del valor. Cuadernos de Economía, 25(44), 33–55. Kang, H. Y. (2023). Patents as capitalist aesthetic forms. Law and Critique. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-023-09349-2 Ingram, G., & Hong, Y. (Eds.). (2012). Value capture and land policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Ingram, G., & Hong, Y. (Eds.). (2010). Municipal revenues and land policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Hortas-Rico, M. (2014). Urban sprawl and municipal budgets in Spain: A dynamic panel data analysis. Journal of the Regional Science Association International, 93(4), 843–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12022 Hortas-Rico, M., & Solé-Ollé, A. (2010). Does urban sprawl increase the costs of providing local public services? Evidence from Spanish municipalities. Urban Studies, 47(7), 1513–1540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009353620 Grieson, R. E., & White, J. R. (1981). The effects of zoning on structure and land markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 10(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(81)90001-2 Ricardo, D. (1973). Principios de economía política y tributación. Fondo de Cultura Económica. Grether, D. M., & Mieszkowski, P. (1980). The effects of nonresidential land uses on the prices of adjacent housing: Some estimates of proximity effects. Journal of Urban Economics, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(80)90052-2 Glaeser, E. (2012). Urban public finance (NBER Working Paper No. 18244). National Bureau of Economic Research. Recuperado de https://www.nber.org/papers/w18244.pdf Glaeser, E., & Gottlieb, J. (2009). The wealth of cities: Agglomeration economies and spatial equilibrium in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), 983-1028. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.4.983 Glaeser, E. L., & Ward, B. A. (2009). The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.06.003 George, H. (1879). Progress and poverty. Recuperado de http://bit.ly/2ilXYg9 Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. F. (2013). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth (2da ed.). Cambridge University Press. Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. F. (2002). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press. Fujita, M. (2012). Thünen and the new economic geography. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(6), 907-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.12.002 Fujita, M. (1989). Urban economic theory: Land use and city size. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625862 Flatters, F., Henderson, V., & Mieszkowsky, P. (1974). Public goods, efficiency, and regional fiscal equalization. Journal of Public Economics, 3(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(74)90028-0 Fischel, W. (2000). Zoning and land use regulation. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 403–442. Recuperado de http://www.dartmouth.edu/~wfischel/Papers/WAF-zoningELEpdf.pdf Ferguson, C. E., & Gould, J. P. (1975). Microeconomic theory (4ta ed.). R.D. Irwin. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. Rymanov, A. (2017). Differential land rent and agricultural taxation. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 63(9), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.17221/127/2016-AGRICECON Diwan, I., & Rodrik, D. (1991). Patents, appropriate technology, and North-South trade. Journal of International Economics, 30(1–2), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(91)90003-O Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424. Zouboulakis, M. (2016). Fundamentación de los derechos de propiedad: Clásicos y modernos. Revista de Economía Institucional, 18(34), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v18n34.02 Wheaton, W. (1993). Land capitalization, Tiebout mobility, and the role of zoning regulations. Journal of Urban Economics, 34(2), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1993.1029 Vickrey, W. (1977). The city as a firm. En M. S. Feldstein & R. P. Inman (Eds.), The economics of public services (pp. 334–343). Palgrave Macmillan. Thisse, J. F. (2014). The new science of cities by Michael Batty: The opinion of an economist. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(3), 805-819. Rosenthal, S., & Strange, W. C. (2004a). The micro-empirics of agglomeration economies. En R. Arnott & D. McMillen (Eds.), A companion to urban economics (pp. 7-53). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996225.ch1 Stiglitz, J. E. (1983). The theory of local public goods twenty–five years after Tiebout: A perspective. En G. Zodrow (Ed.), Local provision of public services (pp. 17–53). Academic Press. Stiglitz, J. E. (1981). Public goods in open economies with heterogeneous individuals. NBER Working Paper No. 802. Recuperado de https://www.nber.org/papers/w0802.pdf Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). The theory of local public goods. En M. S. Feldstein & R. P. Inman (Eds.), The economics of public services (pp. 274–333). Palgrave Macmillan. Starrett, D. (1978). Market allocations of location choice in a model with free mobility. Journal of Economic Theory, 17(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(78)90120-5 Sraffa, P. (1960). Production of commodities by means of commodities. Cambridge University Press. Smith, A. (2011). La riqueza de las naciones (Trad. C. Braun). Alianza Editorial. (Trabajo original publicado en 1776) Serkin, C. (2020). A case for zoning. Notre Dame Law Review, 96(2), 749–798. Recuperado de https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol96/iss2/6 Senior, N. W. (1836). An outline of the science of political economy. W. Clowes and Sons. Sen, A. (2000). Desarrollo y libertad. Editorial Planeta. Schwerhoff, G., Edenhofer, O., & Fleurbaey, M. (2022). Equity and efficiency effects of land value taxation. IMF Working Papers, WP/22/263. Recuperado de https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2022/12/17/Equity-and-Efficiency-Effects-of-Land-Value-Taxation-527079 Savini, F. (2016). Don’t blame public law: The legal articulation of certainty in Amsterdam land-use planning. Town Planning Review, 87(4), 459-479. Rosenthal, S., & Strange, W. (2004b). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. En J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics, 4, 2119-2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80006-3 Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2004). Microfoundations of urban agglomeration economies. En J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 2063-2117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1 Demsetz, H. (2008). Frischmann’s view of “Toward a theory of property rights”. Review of Law and Economics, 4(1), 127-132. Demsetz, H. (1964). The exchange and enforcement of property rights. Journal of Law and Economics, 7, 11-26. Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1973). The property right paradigm. The Journal of Economic History, 33(1), 16–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117138 Alterman, R. (2012). Land-use regulations and property values: The “Windfalls capture” idea revisited. En N. Brooks, K. Donaghy, & G. J. Knaap (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban economics and planning (pp. 755-786). Oxford University Press. Bejarano, J. A. (1999). Los nuevos dominios de la ciencia económica. Cuadernos de Economía, 18(31), 78-91. Claessens, S., & Laeven, L. (2003). Financial development, property rights and growth. The Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2401–2436. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00610.x Che, S., Kumar, R. R., & Stauvermann, P. J. (2021). Taxation of land and economic growth. Economies, 9(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9020061 Brueckner, J., Thisse, J. F., & Zenou, Y. (1999). Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An amenity-based theory. European Economic Review, 43(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00019-1 Borner, S., Bodmer, F., & Kobler, M. (2004). Institutional efficiency and its determinants: The role of political factors in economic growth. OECD. Birch, K. (2020). Technoscience rent: Toward a theory of rentiership for technoscientific capitalism. Science, Technology & Human Values, 45(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919829567 Coriat, B., & Orsi, F. (2002). Establishing a new intellectual property rights regime in the United States: Origins, content and problems. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1491–1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00078-1 Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2016). Sentencia C-192/16, Bogotá, D.C.: 20 de abril de 2016. Recuperado de https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/RELATORIA/2016/C-192-16.htm Cuevas, H. (1996). El capital humano en el sistema de precios. Cuadernos de Economía, 15(24), 7–25. Benabou, R. (1993). Workings of a city: Location, education, and production. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 619-652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118403 Azcurra, F. H. (2014). Marx y Sraffa: Dos modalidades de hacer teoría económica científica. RED Sociales, 1, 19–28. Recuperado de http://fliphtml5.com/xqkd/jvyo Cordes, M. W. (1999). Property rights and land use controls: Balancing private and public interest. North Illinois University Law Review, 19. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2803580 Asabere, P. K., & Colwell, P. F. (1984). Zoning and the value of urban land. Real Estate Issues, 9(1), 22–27. Davis, O. A. (1963). Economic elements in municipal zoning decisions. Land Economics, 39(4), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/3144842 Arnott, R. (2004). Does the Henry George theorem provide a practical guide to optimal city size? The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63(5), 1057-1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2004.00334.x Arnott, R., & Stiglitz, J. (1979). Aggregate land rent, expenditure on public goods, and optimal city size. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(4), 471-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884466 Arnott, R. (1979). Optimal city size in a spatial economy. Journal of Urban Economics, 6(1), 65-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(79)90017-2 Araque, A., Cantor, L., & Moreno, P. (2022). Norma y precio del suelo urbano en la ciudad de Bogotá. Revista EURE - Revista de Estudios Urbano Regionales, 48(143). https://doi.org/10.7764/EURE.48.143.13 Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57(2), 347-359. Coase, R. (1991, diciembre). Prize lecture: The institutional structure of production. Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel. Recuperado de https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1991/coase/lecture/ |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2024-12-04 |
| date_accessioned |
2024-12-04T15:17:53Z |
| date_available |
2024-12-04T15:17:53Z |
| url |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/10061 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v27n52.11 |
| issn |
0124-5996 |
| eissn |
2346-2450 |
| doi |
10.18601/01245996.v27n52.11 |
| citationstartpage |
319 |
| citationendpage |
340 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/10061/17157 |
| _version_ |
1817579008271843328 |