Titulo:
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City.
.
Sumario:
In this work the author offers a rich and deep examination on the practices of “eminent domain” in three of the most important Latin-American cities. He approaches as the previous thing, of a critical way, the relations between the legal rules that concern of “eminent domain” and the institutional context in which the above mentioned rules are applied, in a two-dimensional perspective: the first one, that of the relations between the power judicial, legislative and executive in the relating thing to “eminent domain”, and the second one, the distribution of authority with relation to “eminent domain” to level of national, provincial or local governments. For this route the author achieves a guessed right comparative analysis, giving context... Ver más
Guardado en:
1692-6013
2500-8692
2
2008-07-01
69
100
Antonio Azuela - 2008
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
metarevistapublica_ucatolica_novumjus_80_article_891 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. In this work the author offers a rich and deep examination on the practices of “eminent domain” in three of the most important Latin-American cities. He approaches as the previous thing, of a critical way, the relations between the legal rules that concern of “eminent domain” and the institutional context in which the above mentioned rules are applied, in a two-dimensional perspective: the first one, that of the relations between the power judicial, legislative and executive in the relating thing to “eminent domain”, and the second one, the distribution of authority with relation to “eminent domain” to level of national, provincial or local governments. For this route the author achieves a guessed right comparative analysis, giving context to the above mentioned practices of “eminent domain”, in the reality of each one of this metropolis, allowing the inferences landed that similar studies lack. En este trabajo el autor ofrece un examen sobre las prácticas de dominio eminente (eminent domain) en tres de las más importantes ciudades latinoamericanas. Aborda conforme lo anterior, de manera crítica, las relaciones entre las reglas legales usadas respecto del dominio eminente y el contexto institucional en el cual son aplicadas dichas reglas, en una perspectiva bidimensional: la primera, la de las relaciones entre los poderes judicial, legislativo y ejecutivo en lo concerniente al dominio eminente, y la segunda, la distribución de autoridad con relación al dominio eminente a nivel de gobiernos nacionales, provinciales o locales. Por esta vía logra el autor un acertado análisis comparativo, contextualizando dichas prácticas de dominio eminente, con la realidad de cada una de esas metrópolis, permitiendo las inferencias aterrizadas de que carecen estudios similares. Azuela, Antonio Dominio eminente Derechos de propiedad Expropiación Corrupción Desarrollo económico Eminent domain Property rights Expropriation Corruption Economic development 2 1 Núm. 1 , Año 2008 :Julio - Diciembre Artículo de revista Journal article 2008-07-01T00:00:00Z 2008-07-01T00:00:00Z 2008-07-01 application/pdf Universidad Catolica de Colombia Novum Jus 1692-6013 2500-8692 https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/891 https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/891 eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Antonio Azuela - 2008 69 100 Berliner, D. (2003). Public power, private gain. Institute for Justice. http://www.castlecoalition.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=312 Caro, R. (1974). The power broker: Robert Moses and the fall of New York. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Fischel, W. (2001). The homevoter hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-use policies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Garnett, N. (2006). “The neglected political economy of eminent domain”. Michigan Law Review, 105, p. 101. Munch, P. (1976). “An economic analysis of eminent domain”. Journal of Political Economy, 84, p. 473. Serkin, C. (2005). “The meaning of value: Assessing just compensation for regulatory takings”. Northwestern University Law Review, 99, p. 677. https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/891/918 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |
| institution |
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADCATOLICADECOLOMBIA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Novum Jus |
| title |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. |
| spellingShingle |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. Azuela, Antonio Dominio eminente Derechos de propiedad Expropiación Corrupción Desarrollo económico Eminent domain Property rights Expropriation Corruption Economic development |
| title_short |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. |
| title_full |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. |
| title_fullStr |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. |
| title_sort |
use of eminent domain in são paulo, bogotá, and mexico city. |
| title_eng |
The use of eminent domain in São Paulo, Bogotá, and Mexico City. |
| description |
In this work the author offers a rich and deep examination on the practices of “eminent domain” in three of the most important Latin-American cities. He approaches as the previous thing, of a critical way, the relations between the legal rules that concern of “eminent domain” and the institutional context in which the above mentioned rules are applied, in a two-dimensional perspective: the first one, that of the relations between the power judicial, legislative and executive in the relating thing to “eminent domain”, and the second one, the distribution of authority with relation to “eminent domain” to level of national, provincial or local governments. For this route the author achieves a guessed right comparative analysis, giving context to the above mentioned practices of “eminent domain”, in the reality of each one of this metropolis, allowing the inferences landed that similar studies lack.
|
| description_eng |
En este trabajo el autor ofrece un examen sobre las prácticas de dominio eminente (eminent domain) en tres de las más importantes ciudades latinoamericanas. Aborda conforme lo anterior, de manera crítica, las relaciones entre las reglas legales usadas respecto del dominio eminente y el contexto institucional en el cual son aplicadas dichas reglas, en una perspectiva bidimensional: la primera, la de las relaciones entre los poderes judicial, legislativo y ejecutivo en lo concerniente al dominio eminente, y la segunda, la distribución de autoridad con relación al dominio eminente a nivel de gobiernos nacionales, provinciales o locales. Por esta vía logra el autor un acertado análisis comparativo, contextualizando dichas prácticas de dominio eminente, con la realidad de cada una de esas metrópolis, permitiendo las inferencias aterrizadas de que carecen estudios similares.
|
| author |
Azuela, Antonio |
| author_facet |
Azuela, Antonio |
| topic |
Dominio eminente Derechos de propiedad Expropiación Corrupción Desarrollo económico Eminent domain Property rights Expropriation Corruption Economic development |
| topic_facet |
Dominio eminente Derechos de propiedad Expropiación Corrupción Desarrollo económico Eminent domain Property rights Expropriation Corruption Economic development |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Eminent domain Property rights Expropriation Corruption Economic development |
| citationvolume |
2 |
| citationissue |
1 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 1 , Año 2008 :Julio - Diciembre |
| publisher |
Universidad Catolica de Colombia |
| ispartofjournal |
Novum Jus |
| source |
https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/891 |
| language |
eng |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Antonio Azuela - 2008 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references_eng |
Berliner, D. (2003). Public power, private gain. Institute for Justice. http://www.castlecoalition.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=312 Caro, R. (1974). The power broker: Robert Moses and the fall of New York. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Fischel, W. (2001). The homevoter hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-use policies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Garnett, N. (2006). “The neglected political economy of eminent domain”. Michigan Law Review, 105, p. 101. Munch, P. (1976). “An economic analysis of eminent domain”. Journal of Political Economy, 84, p. 473. Serkin, C. (2005). “The meaning of value: Assessing just compensation for regulatory takings”. Northwestern University Law Review, 99, p. 677. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2008-07-01 |
| date_accessioned |
2008-07-01T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2008-07-01T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/891 |
| url_doi |
https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/891 |
| issn |
1692-6013 |
| eissn |
2500-8692 |
| citationstartpage |
69 |
| citationendpage |
100 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/891/918 |
| _version_ |
1811199993557549056 |