Titulo:

Adaptación y validación argentina de la Cross Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale
.

Sumario:

El estudio de la confianza interpersonal es crucial para el desarrollo psicosocial humano. Se ha observado que, durantela niñez, favorece el comportamiento moral y prosocial, los vínculos de amistad, la competencia social, la experienciade emociones positivas y el rendimiento académico, entre otros aspectos. El presente trabajo tuvo por objetivo adaptar yvalidar la Cross Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale (ccctbs), a fin de poder evaluar este constructo en población argentina. La muestra incluyó 348 niños (51.2% mujeres; 48.8% varones), de entre 8 y 12 años de edad (m = 10.58; de = 1.31),quienes completaron la ccctbs y una escala de apego. Se consiguió una versión conceptual y semánticamente equivalentea la original, con buenas propiedad... Ver más

Guardado en:

0123-9155

1909-9711

26

2022-12-05

78

94

Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2022

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id metarevistapublica_ucatolica_actacolombianadepsicologia_84_article_4415
record_format ojs
institution UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADCATOLICADECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Acta Colombiana de Psicología
title Adaptación y validación argentina de la Cross Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale
spellingShingle Adaptación y validación argentina de la Cross Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale
Oros, Laura Beatriz
Chemisquy, Sonia
Vargas Rubilar, Jael
Eidman, Leandro
Rotenberg, Ken
desarrollo psicosocial
confianza interpersonal
escala
niños
propiedades psicométricas
psychosocial development
interpersonal trust
scale
children
psychometric properties
title_short Adaptación y validación argentina de la Cross Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale
title_full Adaptación y validación argentina de la Cross Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale
title_fullStr Adaptación y validación argentina de la Cross Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale
title_full_unstemmed Adaptación y validación argentina de la Cross Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale
title_sort adaptación y validación argentina de la cross cultural children trust beliefs scale
title_eng Argentinean Adaptation and Validation of the Cross-Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale
description El estudio de la confianza interpersonal es crucial para el desarrollo psicosocial humano. Se ha observado que, durantela niñez, favorece el comportamiento moral y prosocial, los vínculos de amistad, la competencia social, la experienciade emociones positivas y el rendimiento académico, entre otros aspectos. El presente trabajo tuvo por objetivo adaptar yvalidar la Cross Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale (ccctbs), a fin de poder evaluar este constructo en población argentina. La muestra incluyó 348 niños (51.2% mujeres; 48.8% varones), de entre 8 y 12 años de edad (m = 10.58; de = 1.31),quienes completaron la ccctbs y una escala de apego. Se consiguió una versión conceptual y semánticamente equivalentea la original, con buenas propiedades psicométricas. La escala argentina conserva el mismo número de ítems y replica elmodelo operacional de partida, constituido por tres bases principales de la confianza: fiabilidad (α = .76; ω = .80), confianzaemocional (α = .72; ω = .78) y honestidad (α = .78; ω = .83). Las puntuaciones de la ccctbs correlacionaron positiva ysignificativamente con la medida de apego seguro, lo que aporta evidencias de su validez nomológica.
description_eng The study of interpersonal trust is crucial for human psychological development. It has been observed that it enhances moral and prosocial behavior during childhood, as well as friendship bonds, social competence, experience of positive emotions andacademic performance, among others. This research aimed to adapt and validate the Cross-Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale (ccctbs), to assess this construct in the Argentine population. The sample included 348 children (51.2 % female; 48.8 % male) aged 8 to 12 years (m = 10.58; sd = 1.31), who completed the ccctbs and an attachment scale. A version, conceptually and semantically equivalent to the original was obtained, with good psychometric properties. The Argentine scale retains the same number of items and replicates the starting operational model, consisting of three main bases of trust: reliability (α = .76; ω = .80), emotional trust (α = .72; ω = .78) and honesty (α = .78; ω = .83). The ccctbs scores correlated positively and significantly with the secure attachment measure, providing evidence of its nomological validity.
author Oros, Laura Beatriz
Chemisquy, Sonia
Vargas Rubilar, Jael
Eidman, Leandro
Rotenberg, Ken
author_facet Oros, Laura Beatriz
Chemisquy, Sonia
Vargas Rubilar, Jael
Eidman, Leandro
Rotenberg, Ken
topicspa_str_mv desarrollo psicosocial
confianza interpersonal
escala
niños
propiedades psicométricas
topic desarrollo psicosocial
confianza interpersonal
escala
niños
propiedades psicométricas
psychosocial development
interpersonal trust
scale
children
psychometric properties
topic_facet desarrollo psicosocial
confianza interpersonal
escala
niños
propiedades psicométricas
psychosocial development
interpersonal trust
scale
children
psychometric properties
citationvolume 26
citationissue 1
citationedition Núm. 1 , Año 2023 :Acta Colombiana de Psicología
publisher Universidad Católica de Colombia
ispartofjournal Acta Colombiana de Psicología
source https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4415
language spa
format Article
rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2022
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references Al-Shalabi, F. S. (2019). The relationship between organizational trust and organizational identification and its effect on organizational loyalty. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 18(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2019.100646 Ainsworth, M. S. (1979). Infant–mother attachment. American Psychologist, 34(10), 932-937. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.932 American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code Asamblea Médica Mundial. (2013). Declaración de Helsinki de la amm - Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. Asamblea Médica Mundial. http://repositorio.mederi.com.co/bitstream/handle/123456789/386/Declaracion-Helsinki-2013-Esp. pdf?sequence=1 Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2018). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. En G. R. Hancock, L. M. Stapleton & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 98-122). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755649 Benner, J. A. (2004). Biblical word of the month. Trust in ancient Hebrew research center. Biblical Hebrew E-Magazine. Bernath, M. S., & Feshbach, N. D. (1995). Children’s trust: Theory, assessment, development, and research directions. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 4(1), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80048-4 Boldt, L. J., Goffin, K. C., & Kochanska, G. (2020). The significance of early parent-child attachment for emerging regulation: A longitudinal investigation of processes and mechanisms from toddler age to preadolescence. Developmental Psychology, 56(3), 431-443. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000862 Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss (vol. 1., 3.a ed.). Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1989). Una base segura (4.a ed.). Paidós Ibérica. Campbell, L., & Stanton, S. C. E. (2019). Adult attachment and trust in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 148-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc .2018.08.004 Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications. Guilford. Cichosz, P. (2015). Data mining algorithms: Explained using R. Wiley. Citrin, J., & Stoker, L. (2018). Political trust in a cynical age. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 49-70. https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550 Clark, S. E., & Symons, D. K. (2009). Representations of attachment relationships, the self, and significant others in middle childhood. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 18(4), 316-321. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2765384/ Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112 .1.155 Duarte-Rico, L., García-Ramírez, N., Rodríguez-Cruz, E., & Bermúdez-Jaimes, M. (2016). Las prácticas de crianza y su relación con el vínculo afectivo. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología: Ciencia y Tecnología, 9(2), 113- 124. https://revistas.iberoamericana.edu.co/ index.php/ripsicologia/article/download/970/918 Erikson, E. (1987). Identidade, Juventude e crise. (2.a ed.). Guanabara. Finzi, R., Cohen, O., Sapir, Y., & Weizman, A. (2000). Attachment styles in maltreated children: A comparative study. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 31(2), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001944509409 Finzi, R., Har-Even, D., Weizman, A., Tyano, S., & Shnit, D. (1996). The adaptation of the attachment style questionnaire for latency-aged children. Psychology: Israel Journal of Psychology, 5(2), 167-177. Giffin, K. (1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychological Bulletin, 68(2), 104-120. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024833 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis. (7.a ed.). Prentice Hall. Harris, P. L. (2007). Trust. Developmental Science, 10(1), 135- 138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00575.x Hochreich, D. J. (1973). A children’s scale to measure interpersonal trust. Developmental Psychology, 9(1), 141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0035085 Imber, S. C. (1973). Relationship of trust to academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035644 Johnson-George, C., & Swap, W. C. (1982). Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1306-1317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1306 Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361 López Bauta, A. A., & Hernández Cedeño, E. (2020). El cuidado parental durante el primer año de vida. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología, 13(1), 13-22. https://doi. org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.13102 Malti, T., Averdijk, M., Zuffianò, A., Betts, L. R., Rotenberg, K. J., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. P. (2016). Children’s trust and the development of prosocial behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(3), 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415584628 Martí-Vilar, M., Corell-García, L., & Merino-Soto, C. (2019). Systematic review of prosocial behavior measures. Revista de Psicología, 37(1), 349-377. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201901.012 Mikulincer, M. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1209-1224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1209 Miller, P. J. E., & Rempel, J. K. (2004). Trust and partner-enhancing attributions in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 695-705. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262803 Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862. http://www.aepc.es/ijchp/GNEIP07_es.pdf Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. J. (1995). Teoría psicométrica. McGraw-Hill. O’Hara, R. J. (2004). Pasta with a side order of philosophy, please. Times Higher Education Supplement, 14. https:// papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2567564_code2323437.pdf?abstractid=2567564&mirid=1 Oros, L. B., Chemisquy, S., & Vargas Rubilar, J. (2021, 24 de mayo 24- 4 de junio). Confianza interpersonal: su importancia para el desarrollo de emociones positivas y habilidades sociales durante la niñez. En M. Pereyra (Ed.), Aplicaciones en Psicología Positiva [Symposium]. XXII Congreso Virtual Internacional de Psiquiatría, Psicología y Salud Mental interpsiquis, Valencia, España. Ou, C. X., & Sia, C. L. (2009). To trust or to distrust, that is the question: Investigating the trust-distrust paradox. Communications of the acm, 52(5), 135-139. https://doi.org/10.1145/1506409.1506442 Pascuzzo K., Cyr, C., & Moss, E. (2013). Longitudinal association between adolescent attachment, adult romantic attachment, and emotion regulation strategies. Attachment and Human Development, 15(1), 83-103. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14616734.2013.745713 Pesch, A., & Koenig, M. A. (2018). Varieties of trust in preschoolers’ learning and practical decisions. PLoS one, 13(8), Article e0202506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202506 Pinquart, M., Feuβner, C., & Ahnert, L. (2013). Metaanalytic evidence for stability in attachments from infancy to early adulthood. Attachment and Human Development, 15(2), 189-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 4616734.2013.746257 Pino García, G., Aguilar Barajas, I., & Ayala Gaytán, E. A. (2018). El papel de la confianza en proyectos de innovación colaborativa. Propuesta teórico-metodológica. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, 18(58), 629-655. https://doi.org/10.22136/est20181219 Qualter, P., Brown, S. L., Rotenberg, K. J., Vanhalst, J., Harris, R. A., Goossens, L., Bangee, M., & Munn, P. (2013). Trajectories of loneliness during childhood and adolescence: Predictors and health outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 36(6), 1283-1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.01.005 Richaud, M. C., Mesurado, B., & Minzi, M. P. (2019). Attachment style classification questionnaire for latency age: Psychometrics properties of Argentine sample. International Journal of Psychological Research, 12(2), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4058 Rodríguez, M., & Ruiz, M. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. Psicológica, 29(2), 205-227. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2718372 &orden=166859&info=link Rotenberg, K. J. (1980). A promise kept, a promise broken: Developmental bases of trust. Child Development, 51(2), 614-617. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129307 Rotenberg, K. J. (1986). Same-sex patterns and same-sex differences in the trust-value basis of children’s friendships. Sex Roles, 15(11), 613-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288218 Rotenberg, K. J. (1991). Children’s interpersonal trust: Sensitivity to lying, deception, and promise violations. Springer-Verlag. Rotenberg, K. J. (1995). The socialisation of trust: Parents’ and children’s interpersonal trust. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 18(4), 713-726. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502549501800408 Rotenberg, K. J. (2010). The conceptualization of interpersonal trust: A basis, domain, and target framework. In K. J. Rotenberg (Ed.), Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence (pp. 8-27). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750946.002 Rotenberg, K. J. (2019). La psicología de la confianza. Mensajero. Rotenberg, K. J., Fox, C., Green, S., Ruderman, L., Slater, K., Stevens, K., & Carlo, G. (2005). Construction and validation of a children’s interpersonal trust belief scale. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 271-293. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X26192 Rotenberg, K. J., Manley, E., & Walker, K. M. (2021). The relation between young adults’ trust beliefs in others and interpersonal hostility. Aggressive Behavior, 47(5), 544- 556. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21969 Rotenberg, K. J., Petrocchi, S., Lecciso, F., & Marchetti, A. (2013). Children’s trust beliefs in others and trusting behavior in peer interaction. Child Development Research, 2013, Article 806597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013 /806597 Rotenberg, K. J., Sakai, A., Betts, L. R., & Maeshiro, K. (2011, 31 de marzo). Development of a Children’s Cross-cultural Trust Belief Scale. In K. J. Rotenberg (Ed.), Trust during childhood: Common across or unique to culture? [Symposium]. Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Montreal, Canada. Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35(4), 651-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26(5), 443-452. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464 Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1), 1-7. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.1.1 Sakai, A. (2010). Children’s sense of trust in significant others: Genetic versus environmental contributions and buffer to life stressors. In K. J. Rotenberg (Ed.), Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence (pp. 56-84). Cambridge University Press. https://doi. org/10.1017/CBO9780511750946.004 Schlenker, B. R., Helm, B., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1973). The effects of personality and situational variables on behavioural trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(3), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511 750946.004 Sánchez, C. O. (2018). La sociología de Georg Simmel y el ‘capital social’: la confianza como fuerza socializadora. Revista Reflexiones, 97(2), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.15517/rr.v97i2.31481 Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2008). Adult attachment and cognitive and affective reactions to positive and negative events. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1844-1865. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00146.x Simpson, J. A. (2007). Foundations of interpersonal trust. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 587-607). The Guilford Press. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. S (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge. Van De Walle, S., & Six, F. (2013). Trust and distrust as distinct concepts: Why studying distrust in institutions is important. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(2), 158-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.785146 Ventura-León, J. L., & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente Omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 625-627. https://www. redalyc.org/pdf/773/77349627039.pdf Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 33(3), 755-782. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/ analesps.33.3.268401 Wentzel, K. R., Muenks, K., McNeish, D., & Russell, S. (2018). Emotional support, social goals, and classroom behavior: A multilevel, multisite study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 611-627. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000239 Yáñez Gallego, R., Osorio Baeza, J., & Ibarretxe–Antuñano, I. (2008). Conceptualización metafórica de la confianza interpersonal. Universitas Psychologica, 7(1), 43-55. https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/ article/view/199/207 Zarouali, B., Poels, K., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2018). ‘You talking to me?’ The influence of peer communication on adolescents’ persuasion knowledge and attitude towards social advertisements. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(5), 502-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1458903
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2022-12-05
date_accessioned 2022-12-05T00:00:00Z
date_available 2022-12-05T00:00:00Z
url https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4415
url_doi https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.6
issn 0123-9155
eissn 1909-9711
doi 10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.6
citationstartpage 78
citationendpage 94
url3_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4415/4501
url2_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4415/4409
url4_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4415/4521
_version_ 1811200723510099968
spelling Adaptación y validación argentina de la Cross Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale
Argentinean Adaptation and Validation of the Cross-Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale
El estudio de la confianza interpersonal es crucial para el desarrollo psicosocial humano. Se ha observado que, durantela niñez, favorece el comportamiento moral y prosocial, los vínculos de amistad, la competencia social, la experienciade emociones positivas y el rendimiento académico, entre otros aspectos. El presente trabajo tuvo por objetivo adaptar yvalidar la Cross Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale (ccctbs), a fin de poder evaluar este constructo en población argentina. La muestra incluyó 348 niños (51.2% mujeres; 48.8% varones), de entre 8 y 12 años de edad (m = 10.58; de = 1.31),quienes completaron la ccctbs y una escala de apego. Se consiguió una versión conceptual y semánticamente equivalentea la original, con buenas propiedades psicométricas. La escala argentina conserva el mismo número de ítems y replica elmodelo operacional de partida, constituido por tres bases principales de la confianza: fiabilidad (α = .76; ω = .80), confianzaemocional (α = .72; ω = .78) y honestidad (α = .78; ω = .83). Las puntuaciones de la ccctbs correlacionaron positiva ysignificativamente con la medida de apego seguro, lo que aporta evidencias de su validez nomológica.
The study of interpersonal trust is crucial for human psychological development. It has been observed that it enhances moral and prosocial behavior during childhood, as well as friendship bonds, social competence, experience of positive emotions andacademic performance, among others. This research aimed to adapt and validate the Cross-Cultural Children Trust Beliefs Scale (ccctbs), to assess this construct in the Argentine population. The sample included 348 children (51.2 % female; 48.8 % male) aged 8 to 12 years (m = 10.58; sd = 1.31), who completed the ccctbs and an attachment scale. A version, conceptually and semantically equivalent to the original was obtained, with good psychometric properties. The Argentine scale retains the same number of items and replicates the starting operational model, consisting of three main bases of trust: reliability (α = .76; ω = .80), emotional trust (α = .72; ω = .78) and honesty (α = .78; ω = .83). The ccctbs scores correlated positively and significantly with the secure attachment measure, providing evidence of its nomological validity.
Oros, Laura Beatriz
Chemisquy, Sonia
Vargas Rubilar, Jael
Eidman, Leandro
Rotenberg, Ken
desarrollo psicosocial
confianza interpersonal
escala
niños
propiedades psicométricas
psychosocial development
interpersonal trust
scale
children
psychometric properties
26
1
Núm. 1 , Año 2023 :Acta Colombiana de Psicología
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2022-12-05T00:00:00Z
2022-12-05T00:00:00Z
2022-12-05
text/html
application/pdf
text/xml
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Acta Colombiana de Psicología
0123-9155
1909-9711
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4415
10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.6
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.6
spa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2022
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
78
94
Al-Shalabi, F. S. (2019). The relationship between organizational trust and organizational identification and its effect on organizational loyalty. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 18(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2019.100646 Ainsworth, M. S. (1979). Infant–mother attachment. American Psychologist, 34(10), 932-937. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.932 American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code Asamblea Médica Mundial. (2013). Declaración de Helsinki de la amm - Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. Asamblea Médica Mundial. http://repositorio.mederi.com.co/bitstream/handle/123456789/386/Declaracion-Helsinki-2013-Esp. pdf?sequence=1 Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2018). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. En G. R. Hancock, L. M. Stapleton & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 98-122). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755649 Benner, J. A. (2004). Biblical word of the month. Trust in ancient Hebrew research center. Biblical Hebrew E-Magazine. Bernath, M. S., & Feshbach, N. D. (1995). Children’s trust: Theory, assessment, development, and research directions. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 4(1), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80048-4 Boldt, L. J., Goffin, K. C., & Kochanska, G. (2020). The significance of early parent-child attachment for emerging regulation: A longitudinal investigation of processes and mechanisms from toddler age to preadolescence. Developmental Psychology, 56(3), 431-443. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000862 Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss (vol. 1., 3.a ed.). Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1989). Una base segura (4.a ed.). Paidós Ibérica. Campbell, L., & Stanton, S. C. E. (2019). Adult attachment and trust in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 148-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc .2018.08.004 Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications. Guilford. Cichosz, P. (2015). Data mining algorithms: Explained using R. Wiley. Citrin, J., & Stoker, L. (2018). Political trust in a cynical age. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 49-70. https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550 Clark, S. E., & Symons, D. K. (2009). Representations of attachment relationships, the self, and significant others in middle childhood. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 18(4), 316-321. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2765384/ Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112 .1.155 Duarte-Rico, L., García-Ramírez, N., Rodríguez-Cruz, E., & Bermúdez-Jaimes, M. (2016). Las prácticas de crianza y su relación con el vínculo afectivo. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología: Ciencia y Tecnología, 9(2), 113- 124. https://revistas.iberoamericana.edu.co/ index.php/ripsicologia/article/download/970/918 Erikson, E. (1987). Identidade, Juventude e crise. (2.a ed.). Guanabara. Finzi, R., Cohen, O., Sapir, Y., & Weizman, A. (2000). Attachment styles in maltreated children: A comparative study. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 31(2), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001944509409 Finzi, R., Har-Even, D., Weizman, A., Tyano, S., & Shnit, D. (1996). The adaptation of the attachment style questionnaire for latency-aged children. Psychology: Israel Journal of Psychology, 5(2), 167-177. Giffin, K. (1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychological Bulletin, 68(2), 104-120. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024833 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis. (7.a ed.). Prentice Hall. Harris, P. L. (2007). Trust. Developmental Science, 10(1), 135- 138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00575.x Hochreich, D. J. (1973). A children’s scale to measure interpersonal trust. Developmental Psychology, 9(1), 141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0035085 Imber, S. C. (1973). Relationship of trust to academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035644 Johnson-George, C., & Swap, W. C. (1982). Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1306-1317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1306 Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361 López Bauta, A. A., & Hernández Cedeño, E. (2020). El cuidado parental durante el primer año de vida. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología, 13(1), 13-22. https://doi. org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.13102 Malti, T., Averdijk, M., Zuffianò, A., Betts, L. R., Rotenberg, K. J., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. P. (2016). Children’s trust and the development of prosocial behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(3), 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415584628 Martí-Vilar, M., Corell-García, L., & Merino-Soto, C. (2019). Systematic review of prosocial behavior measures. Revista de Psicología, 37(1), 349-377. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201901.012 Mikulincer, M. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1209-1224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1209 Miller, P. J. E., & Rempel, J. K. (2004). Trust and partner-enhancing attributions in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 695-705. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262803 Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862. http://www.aepc.es/ijchp/GNEIP07_es.pdf Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. J. (1995). Teoría psicométrica. McGraw-Hill. O’Hara, R. J. (2004). Pasta with a side order of philosophy, please. Times Higher Education Supplement, 14. https:// papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2567564_code2323437.pdf?abstractid=2567564&mirid=1 Oros, L. B., Chemisquy, S., & Vargas Rubilar, J. (2021, 24 de mayo 24- 4 de junio). Confianza interpersonal: su importancia para el desarrollo de emociones positivas y habilidades sociales durante la niñez. En M. Pereyra (Ed.), Aplicaciones en Psicología Positiva [Symposium]. XXII Congreso Virtual Internacional de Psiquiatría, Psicología y Salud Mental interpsiquis, Valencia, España. Ou, C. X., & Sia, C. L. (2009). To trust or to distrust, that is the question: Investigating the trust-distrust paradox. Communications of the acm, 52(5), 135-139. https://doi.org/10.1145/1506409.1506442 Pascuzzo K., Cyr, C., & Moss, E. (2013). Longitudinal association between adolescent attachment, adult romantic attachment, and emotion regulation strategies. Attachment and Human Development, 15(1), 83-103. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14616734.2013.745713 Pesch, A., & Koenig, M. A. (2018). Varieties of trust in preschoolers’ learning and practical decisions. PLoS one, 13(8), Article e0202506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202506 Pinquart, M., Feuβner, C., & Ahnert, L. (2013). Metaanalytic evidence for stability in attachments from infancy to early adulthood. Attachment and Human Development, 15(2), 189-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 4616734.2013.746257 Pino García, G., Aguilar Barajas, I., & Ayala Gaytán, E. A. (2018). El papel de la confianza en proyectos de innovación colaborativa. Propuesta teórico-metodológica. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, 18(58), 629-655. https://doi.org/10.22136/est20181219 Qualter, P., Brown, S. L., Rotenberg, K. J., Vanhalst, J., Harris, R. A., Goossens, L., Bangee, M., & Munn, P. (2013). Trajectories of loneliness during childhood and adolescence: Predictors and health outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 36(6), 1283-1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.01.005 Richaud, M. C., Mesurado, B., & Minzi, M. P. (2019). Attachment style classification questionnaire for latency age: Psychometrics properties of Argentine sample. International Journal of Psychological Research, 12(2), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4058 Rodríguez, M., & Ruiz, M. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. Psicológica, 29(2), 205-227. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2718372 &orden=166859&info=link Rotenberg, K. J. (1980). A promise kept, a promise broken: Developmental bases of trust. Child Development, 51(2), 614-617. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129307 Rotenberg, K. J. (1986). Same-sex patterns and same-sex differences in the trust-value basis of children’s friendships. Sex Roles, 15(11), 613-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288218 Rotenberg, K. J. (1991). Children’s interpersonal trust: Sensitivity to lying, deception, and promise violations. Springer-Verlag. Rotenberg, K. J. (1995). The socialisation of trust: Parents’ and children’s interpersonal trust. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 18(4), 713-726. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502549501800408 Rotenberg, K. J. (2010). The conceptualization of interpersonal trust: A basis, domain, and target framework. In K. J. Rotenberg (Ed.), Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence (pp. 8-27). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750946.002 Rotenberg, K. J. (2019). La psicología de la confianza. Mensajero. Rotenberg, K. J., Fox, C., Green, S., Ruderman, L., Slater, K., Stevens, K., & Carlo, G. (2005). Construction and validation of a children’s interpersonal trust belief scale. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 271-293. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X26192 Rotenberg, K. J., Manley, E., & Walker, K. M. (2021). The relation between young adults’ trust beliefs in others and interpersonal hostility. Aggressive Behavior, 47(5), 544- 556. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21969 Rotenberg, K. J., Petrocchi, S., Lecciso, F., & Marchetti, A. (2013). Children’s trust beliefs in others and trusting behavior in peer interaction. Child Development Research, 2013, Article 806597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013 /806597 Rotenberg, K. J., Sakai, A., Betts, L. R., & Maeshiro, K. (2011, 31 de marzo). Development of a Children’s Cross-cultural Trust Belief Scale. In K. J. Rotenberg (Ed.), Trust during childhood: Common across or unique to culture? [Symposium]. Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Montreal, Canada. Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35(4), 651-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26(5), 443-452. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464 Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1), 1-7. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.1.1 Sakai, A. (2010). Children’s sense of trust in significant others: Genetic versus environmental contributions and buffer to life stressors. In K. J. Rotenberg (Ed.), Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence (pp. 56-84). Cambridge University Press. https://doi. org/10.1017/CBO9780511750946.004 Schlenker, B. R., Helm, B., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1973). The effects of personality and situational variables on behavioural trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(3), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511 750946.004 Sánchez, C. O. (2018). La sociología de Georg Simmel y el ‘capital social’: la confianza como fuerza socializadora. Revista Reflexiones, 97(2), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.15517/rr.v97i2.31481 Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2008). Adult attachment and cognitive and affective reactions to positive and negative events. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1844-1865. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00146.x Simpson, J. A. (2007). Foundations of interpersonal trust. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 587-607). The Guilford Press. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. S (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge. Van De Walle, S., & Six, F. (2013). Trust and distrust as distinct concepts: Why studying distrust in institutions is important. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(2), 158-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.785146 Ventura-León, J. L., & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente Omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 625-627. https://www. redalyc.org/pdf/773/77349627039.pdf Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 33(3), 755-782. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/ analesps.33.3.268401 Wentzel, K. R., Muenks, K., McNeish, D., & Russell, S. (2018). Emotional support, social goals, and classroom behavior: A multilevel, multisite study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 611-627. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000239 Yáñez Gallego, R., Osorio Baeza, J., & Ibarretxe–Antuñano, I. (2008). Conceptualización metafórica de la confianza interpersonal. Universitas Psychologica, 7(1), 43-55. https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/ article/view/199/207 Zarouali, B., Poels, K., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2018). ‘You talking to me?’ The influence of peer communication on adolescents’ persuasion knowledge and attitude towards social advertisements. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(5), 502-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1458903
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4415/4501
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4415/4409
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4415/4521
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication