Titulo:

Efecto de la contigüidad espacial sobre el aprendizaje de secuencias de posiciones
.

Sumario:

Cuatro condiciones de contigüidad espacial de posiciones fueron empleadas para evaluar el aprendizaje de secuencias. Se emplearon dos secuencias de 16 y 25 posiciones presentadas en dos matrices de 4×4 y 5×5, respectivamente. Dentro de cada matriz, 4 (en la matriz de 4×4) o 6 posiciones (en la matriz de 5×5) presentaron contigüidad espacial. Entre grupos, se varió el punto de la secuencia en el que se presentaron las posiciones contiguas. De este modo, la contigüidad espacial de las 4 o 6 posiciones se presentó al inicio de la secuencia (Grupo 1), en la parte media (Grupo 2), al final de la secuencia (Grupo 3), o bien, se presentó una secuencia en la que todas las posiciones ocurrieron sin contigüidad espacial (Grupo 4). Participaron 28 est... Ver más

Guardado en:

0123-9155

1909-9711

26

2022-12-05

113

126

Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2022

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id metarevistapublica_ucatolica_actacolombianadepsicologia_84_article_4337
record_format ojs
spelling Efecto de la contigüidad espacial sobre el aprendizaje de secuencias de posiciones
Effect of Spatial Contiguity on Learning Sequences of Positions
Cuatro condiciones de contigüidad espacial de posiciones fueron empleadas para evaluar el aprendizaje de secuencias. Se emplearon dos secuencias de 16 y 25 posiciones presentadas en dos matrices de 4×4 y 5×5, respectivamente. Dentro de cada matriz, 4 (en la matriz de 4×4) o 6 posiciones (en la matriz de 5×5) presentaron contigüidad espacial. Entre grupos, se varió el punto de la secuencia en el que se presentaron las posiciones contiguas. De este modo, la contigüidad espacial de las 4 o 6 posiciones se presentó al inicio de la secuencia (Grupo 1), en la parte media (Grupo 2), al final de la secuencia (Grupo 3), o bien, se presentó una secuencia en la que todas las posiciones ocurrieron sin contigüidad espacial (Grupo 4). Participaron 28 estudiantes de licenciatura. Los resultados no mostraron diferencias entre grupos en cuanto al número de ensayos requeridospara reproducir la secuencia correctamente. El número de errores fue menor cuando las posiciones contiguas se presentaron al inicio de la secuencia. Los hallazgos se explican a partir de un posible efecto de acentuación de la primacía, dado por la ocurrencia de posiciones contiguas al inicio de la secuencia.
Four conditions of spatial contiguity of positions were used to assess sequence learning. Two sequences of 16 and 25 positions presented in two matrices of 4×4 and 5×5 respectively were used. Within each matrix, 4 (in the 4×4 matrix) or 6 positions (in the 5×5 matrix) presented spatial contiguity. The place at the sequence in which contiguous positions occurred varied across groups. In this way, spatial contiguity of the 4 or 6 positions was presented at the beginning of the sequence (Group 1), in the middle part (Group 2), at the end of the sequence (Group 3) or it was presented a sequence in which allpositions occurred without spatial contiguity (Group 4). 28 undergraduate students participated. Results showed no differences among groups in the number of trials required to reproduce the sequence correctly. Number of errors was lower when contiguous positions were presented at the beginning of the sequence. These findings are explained as a possible effect of accentuation of primacy given by the occurrence of contiguous positions at the beginning of the sequence.
Tamayo , Jairo Ernesto
Rodríguez Pérez, María Elena
Mercado Rodríguez, Fabiola
aprendizaje de secuencias
contigüidad espacial
recuerdo serial inmediato
orden serial
memoria
agrupamiento
sequence learning
spatial contiguity
immediate serial recall
serial order
memory
clustering
26
1
Núm. 1 , Año 2023 :Acta Colombiana de Psicología
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2022-12-05T00:00:00Z
2022-12-05T00:00:00Z
2022-12-05
text/html
application/pdf
text/xml
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Acta Colombiana de Psicología
0123-9155
1909-9711
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4337
10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.8
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.8
spa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2022
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
113
126
American Psychological Association [APA]. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. https:// www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf
Beran, M. J., Pate, J. L., Washburn, D. A., & Rumbaugh, D. M. (2004). Sequential responding and planning in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 30(3), 203–212. https://doi. org/10.1037/0097-7403.30.3.203
Botvinick, M. M., Wang, J., Cowan, E., Roy, S., Bastianen, C., Patrick Mayo, J., & Houk, J. C. (2009). An analysis of immediate serial recall performance in a macaque. Animal Cognition, 12(5), 671–678. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10071-009-0226-z
Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107(1), 127–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-295X.107.1.127
Castro, L. (1990). Diseño experimental sin estadística: usos y restricciones en su aplicación a las ciencias de la conducta. Trillas.
Clegg, B. A., Digirolamo, G. J., & Keele, S. W. (1998). Sequence learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(8), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(98)0120 2-9
DuBrow, S., & Davachi, L. (2013). The influence of context boundaries on memory for the sequential order of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 142(4), 1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0034024
Ebenholtz, S. (1963). Serial learning: Position learning and sequential associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(4), 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1037/ h0048320
Farrand, P., Parmentier, F. B., & Jones, D. M. (2001). Temporal-spatial memory: retrieval of spatial information does not reduce recency. Acta Psychologica, 106(3), 285– 301. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00054-8 Friedman, W. J. (1993). Memory for the time of past events. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 44–66. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.44
Healey, M. K., Long, N. M., & Kahana, M. J. (2019). Contiguity in episodic memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(3), 699–720. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1537-3
Henson R. N. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The Start-End Model. Cognitive Psychology, 36(2), 73– 137. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0685
Hintzman, D. L. (2016). Is memory organized by temporal contiguity? Memory & Cognition, 44(3), 365–375 https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0573-8
Hurlstone, M. J., & Hitch, G. J. (2015). How is the serial order of a spatial sequence represented? Insights from transposition latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), 295-324. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038223
Hursltone, M., Hitch, G., & Baddley, A. (2014). Memory of serial order across domains: an overview of the literature and directions of future research. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 339-373. https://doi:10.1037/a0034221
Inoue, S., & Matsuzawa, T. (2009). Acquisition and memory of sequence order in young and adult chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Animal cognition, 12 Suppl 1, S59–S69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0274-4
Jones, D., Farrand, P., Stuart, G., & Morris, N. (1995). Functional equivalence of verbal and spatial information in serial short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 1008–1018. https://doi. org/10.1037//0278-7393.21.4.1008
Kao, T., Jensen, G., Michaelcheck, C., Ferrera, V. P., & Terrace, H. S. (2020). Absolute and relative knowledge of ordinal position on implied lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(12), 2227–2243. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000783
Kausler, D. (1966). Readings in Verbal Learning Contemporary theory and Research. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Leite, G. d. L., Alves, M. V., Ekuni, R., & Bueno, O. F. A. (2018). Effect of intermediate repeated items on immediate recall in a modified Hebb paradigm. Psychology & Neuroscience, 11(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000113
Lewandowsky, S., & Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1989). Memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 96(1), 25–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.25
Lindsey, D. (2019). Item-to-Item Associations Contribute to Memory for Serial Order [Doctoral thesis, Vanderbilt University]. Vanderbilt University Institutional Repository: https://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/etd-062620 19-140640
Lindsey, D. R. B., & Logan, G. D. (2021). Previously retrieved items contribute to memory for serial order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(9), 1403–1438. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001052
Logan, G. D. (2021). Serial order in perception, memory, and action. Psychological Review, 128(1), 1-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000253
Majerus, S., & Oberauer, K. (2020). Working memory and serial order: Evidence against numerical order codes but for item-position associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(12), 2244–2260. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000792
Myers, J. L. (1979). Fundamentals of Experimental Design. Third edition. Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Miller G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
McClearn, G. E., & Harlow, H. F. (1954). The effect of spatial contiguity on discrimination learning by rhesus monkeys. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47(5), 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059728
Nairne, J. S. (2015). The Three “Ws” of Episodic Memory: What, When, and Where. The American Journal of Psychology, 128(2), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.2.0267
Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
Pathman, T., & Ghetti S. (2015). Eye movements provide an index of vertical memory for temporal order. Plos One, 10(5), Article e0125648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0125648
Pathman, T., & Ghetti, S. (2016). More to it than meets the eye: how eye movements can elucidate the development of episodic memory. Memory (Hove, England), 24(6), 721- 736. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1155870
Solway, A., Murdock, B., & Kahana, M. (2012). Positional and temporal clustering in serial order memory. Memory & Cognition, 40(2), 177- 190. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0142-8
Scarf, D., Danly, E., Morgan, G., Colombo, M., & Terrace, H. S. (2011). Sequential planning in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Animal Cognition, 14(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0365-2
Tan, L., & Ward, G. (2000). A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1589–1625. https://doi. org/10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1589
Tamayo Tamayo, J. E. (2019). Aprendizaje serial de secuencias basadas en la posición y dimensión de sus componentes. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología, 12(3), 9-20. https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/1683
Young, R. (1962). Test of three hypotheses about the effective stimulus in serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0038534
Young, R., Patterson, J., & Benson, W. (1963). Backward serial learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1(5), 335-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80013-4
Zhang, H., Zhen, Y., Yu, S., Long, T., Zhang, B., Jiang, X., Li, J., Fang, W., Sigman, M., Dehaene, S., & Wang, L. (2022). Working Memory for Spatial Sequences: Developmental and Evolutionary Factors in Encoding Ordinal and Relational Structures. The Journal of Neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 42(5), 850–864. https://doi.org/10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.0603-21.2021
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4337/4503
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4337/4418
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4337/4523
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication
institution UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADCATOLICADECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Acta Colombiana de Psicología
title Efecto de la contigüidad espacial sobre el aprendizaje de secuencias de posiciones
spellingShingle Efecto de la contigüidad espacial sobre el aprendizaje de secuencias de posiciones
Tamayo , Jairo Ernesto
Rodríguez Pérez, María Elena
Mercado Rodríguez, Fabiola
aprendizaje de secuencias
contigüidad espacial
recuerdo serial inmediato
orden serial
memoria
agrupamiento
sequence learning
spatial contiguity
immediate serial recall
serial order
memory
clustering
title_short Efecto de la contigüidad espacial sobre el aprendizaje de secuencias de posiciones
title_full Efecto de la contigüidad espacial sobre el aprendizaje de secuencias de posiciones
title_fullStr Efecto de la contigüidad espacial sobre el aprendizaje de secuencias de posiciones
title_full_unstemmed Efecto de la contigüidad espacial sobre el aprendizaje de secuencias de posiciones
title_sort efecto de la contigüidad espacial sobre el aprendizaje de secuencias de posiciones
title_eng Effect of Spatial Contiguity on Learning Sequences of Positions
description Cuatro condiciones de contigüidad espacial de posiciones fueron empleadas para evaluar el aprendizaje de secuencias. Se emplearon dos secuencias de 16 y 25 posiciones presentadas en dos matrices de 4×4 y 5×5, respectivamente. Dentro de cada matriz, 4 (en la matriz de 4×4) o 6 posiciones (en la matriz de 5×5) presentaron contigüidad espacial. Entre grupos, se varió el punto de la secuencia en el que se presentaron las posiciones contiguas. De este modo, la contigüidad espacial de las 4 o 6 posiciones se presentó al inicio de la secuencia (Grupo 1), en la parte media (Grupo 2), al final de la secuencia (Grupo 3), o bien, se presentó una secuencia en la que todas las posiciones ocurrieron sin contigüidad espacial (Grupo 4). Participaron 28 estudiantes de licenciatura. Los resultados no mostraron diferencias entre grupos en cuanto al número de ensayos requeridospara reproducir la secuencia correctamente. El número de errores fue menor cuando las posiciones contiguas se presentaron al inicio de la secuencia. Los hallazgos se explican a partir de un posible efecto de acentuación de la primacía, dado por la ocurrencia de posiciones contiguas al inicio de la secuencia.
description_eng Four conditions of spatial contiguity of positions were used to assess sequence learning. Two sequences of 16 and 25 positions presented in two matrices of 4×4 and 5×5 respectively were used. Within each matrix, 4 (in the 4×4 matrix) or 6 positions (in the 5×5 matrix) presented spatial contiguity. The place at the sequence in which contiguous positions occurred varied across groups. In this way, spatial contiguity of the 4 or 6 positions was presented at the beginning of the sequence (Group 1), in the middle part (Group 2), at the end of the sequence (Group 3) or it was presented a sequence in which allpositions occurred without spatial contiguity (Group 4). 28 undergraduate students participated. Results showed no differences among groups in the number of trials required to reproduce the sequence correctly. Number of errors was lower when contiguous positions were presented at the beginning of the sequence. These findings are explained as a possible effect of accentuation of primacy given by the occurrence of contiguous positions at the beginning of the sequence.
author Tamayo , Jairo Ernesto
Rodríguez Pérez, María Elena
Mercado Rodríguez, Fabiola
author_facet Tamayo , Jairo Ernesto
Rodríguez Pérez, María Elena
Mercado Rodríguez, Fabiola
topicspa_str_mv aprendizaje de secuencias
contigüidad espacial
recuerdo serial inmediato
orden serial
memoria
agrupamiento
topic aprendizaje de secuencias
contigüidad espacial
recuerdo serial inmediato
orden serial
memoria
agrupamiento
sequence learning
spatial contiguity
immediate serial recall
serial order
memory
clustering
topic_facet aprendizaje de secuencias
contigüidad espacial
recuerdo serial inmediato
orden serial
memoria
agrupamiento
sequence learning
spatial contiguity
immediate serial recall
serial order
memory
clustering
citationvolume 26
citationissue 1
citationedition Núm. 1 , Año 2023 :Acta Colombiana de Psicología
publisher Universidad Católica de Colombia
ispartofjournal Acta Colombiana de Psicología
source https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4337
language spa
format Article
rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2022
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references American Psychological Association [APA]. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. https:// www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf
Beran, M. J., Pate, J. L., Washburn, D. A., & Rumbaugh, D. M. (2004). Sequential responding and planning in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 30(3), 203–212. https://doi. org/10.1037/0097-7403.30.3.203
Botvinick, M. M., Wang, J., Cowan, E., Roy, S., Bastianen, C., Patrick Mayo, J., & Houk, J. C. (2009). An analysis of immediate serial recall performance in a macaque. Animal Cognition, 12(5), 671–678. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10071-009-0226-z
Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107(1), 127–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-295X.107.1.127
Castro, L. (1990). Diseño experimental sin estadística: usos y restricciones en su aplicación a las ciencias de la conducta. Trillas.
Clegg, B. A., Digirolamo, G. J., & Keele, S. W. (1998). Sequence learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(8), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(98)0120 2-9
DuBrow, S., & Davachi, L. (2013). The influence of context boundaries on memory for the sequential order of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 142(4), 1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0034024
Ebenholtz, S. (1963). Serial learning: Position learning and sequential associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(4), 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1037/ h0048320
Farrand, P., Parmentier, F. B., & Jones, D. M. (2001). Temporal-spatial memory: retrieval of spatial information does not reduce recency. Acta Psychologica, 106(3), 285– 301. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00054-8 Friedman, W. J. (1993). Memory for the time of past events. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 44–66. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.44
Healey, M. K., Long, N. M., & Kahana, M. J. (2019). Contiguity in episodic memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(3), 699–720. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1537-3
Henson R. N. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The Start-End Model. Cognitive Psychology, 36(2), 73– 137. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0685
Hintzman, D. L. (2016). Is memory organized by temporal contiguity? Memory & Cognition, 44(3), 365–375 https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0573-8
Hurlstone, M. J., & Hitch, G. J. (2015). How is the serial order of a spatial sequence represented? Insights from transposition latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), 295-324. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038223
Hursltone, M., Hitch, G., & Baddley, A. (2014). Memory of serial order across domains: an overview of the literature and directions of future research. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 339-373. https://doi:10.1037/a0034221
Inoue, S., & Matsuzawa, T. (2009). Acquisition and memory of sequence order in young and adult chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Animal cognition, 12 Suppl 1, S59–S69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0274-4
Jones, D., Farrand, P., Stuart, G., & Morris, N. (1995). Functional equivalence of verbal and spatial information in serial short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 1008–1018. https://doi. org/10.1037//0278-7393.21.4.1008
Kao, T., Jensen, G., Michaelcheck, C., Ferrera, V. P., & Terrace, H. S. (2020). Absolute and relative knowledge of ordinal position on implied lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(12), 2227–2243. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000783
Kausler, D. (1966). Readings in Verbal Learning Contemporary theory and Research. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Leite, G. d. L., Alves, M. V., Ekuni, R., & Bueno, O. F. A. (2018). Effect of intermediate repeated items on immediate recall in a modified Hebb paradigm. Psychology & Neuroscience, 11(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000113
Lewandowsky, S., & Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1989). Memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 96(1), 25–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.25
Lindsey, D. (2019). Item-to-Item Associations Contribute to Memory for Serial Order [Doctoral thesis, Vanderbilt University]. Vanderbilt University Institutional Repository: https://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/etd-062620 19-140640
Lindsey, D. R. B., & Logan, G. D. (2021). Previously retrieved items contribute to memory for serial order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(9), 1403–1438. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001052
Logan, G. D. (2021). Serial order in perception, memory, and action. Psychological Review, 128(1), 1-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000253
Majerus, S., & Oberauer, K. (2020). Working memory and serial order: Evidence against numerical order codes but for item-position associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(12), 2244–2260. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000792
Myers, J. L. (1979). Fundamentals of Experimental Design. Third edition. Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Miller G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
McClearn, G. E., & Harlow, H. F. (1954). The effect of spatial contiguity on discrimination learning by rhesus monkeys. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47(5), 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059728
Nairne, J. S. (2015). The Three “Ws” of Episodic Memory: What, When, and Where. The American Journal of Psychology, 128(2), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.2.0267
Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
Pathman, T., & Ghetti S. (2015). Eye movements provide an index of vertical memory for temporal order. Plos One, 10(5), Article e0125648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0125648
Pathman, T., & Ghetti, S. (2016). More to it than meets the eye: how eye movements can elucidate the development of episodic memory. Memory (Hove, England), 24(6), 721- 736. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1155870
Solway, A., Murdock, B., & Kahana, M. (2012). Positional and temporal clustering in serial order memory. Memory & Cognition, 40(2), 177- 190. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0142-8
Scarf, D., Danly, E., Morgan, G., Colombo, M., & Terrace, H. S. (2011). Sequential planning in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Animal Cognition, 14(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0365-2
Tan, L., & Ward, G. (2000). A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1589–1625. https://doi. org/10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1589
Tamayo Tamayo, J. E. (2019). Aprendizaje serial de secuencias basadas en la posición y dimensión de sus componentes. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología, 12(3), 9-20. https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/1683
Young, R. (1962). Test of three hypotheses about the effective stimulus in serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0038534
Young, R., Patterson, J., & Benson, W. (1963). Backward serial learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1(5), 335-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80013-4
Zhang, H., Zhen, Y., Yu, S., Long, T., Zhang, B., Jiang, X., Li, J., Fang, W., Sigman, M., Dehaene, S., & Wang, L. (2022). Working Memory for Spatial Sequences: Developmental and Evolutionary Factors in Encoding Ordinal and Relational Structures. The Journal of Neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 42(5), 850–864. https://doi.org/10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.0603-21.2021
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2022-12-05
date_accessioned 2022-12-05T00:00:00Z
date_available 2022-12-05T00:00:00Z
url https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4337
url_doi https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.8
issn 0123-9155
eissn 1909-9711
doi 10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.8
citationstartpage 113
citationendpage 126
url3_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4337/4503
url2_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4337/4418
url4_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4337/4523
_version_ 1811200723012026368