Perspectivas epistemológicas en el estudio científico y la evaluación clínica de las funciones ejecutivas.
Titulo:

Perspectivas epistemológicas en el estudio científico y la evaluación clínica de las funciones ejecutivas.
.

Sumario:

En este artículo se examinan perspectivas epistemológicas que han moldeado e influenciado la búsqueda científica orientada hacia comprender aquello que los neuropsicólogos denominan las “funciones ejecutivas (FE). El término funciones ejecutivas se refiere a aspectos de control de la cognición y la conducta. Las ideas expuestas en este manuscrito presuponen que la orientación epistemológica de una persona determina la manera en la que ella conceptualiza la interacción entre las funciones cerebrales y su entorno físico. Cada una de esas orientaciones conlleva suposiciones acerca del modo como operan las FE y, por ende, el modo como deben ser evaluadas. Hasta fechas recientes esto se había abordado principalmente desde el punto de vista de do... Ver más

Guardado en:

Acta Colombiana de Psicología

0123-9155

1909-9711

Armengol de la Miyar, Carmen G.

Moes, Elisabeth J.

UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA

10.14718/ACP.2014.17.2.8

17

2014-07-01

69

79

Colombia

Funciones ejecutivas

Neurofenomenología

Neuropsicología

Cognición corpórea

Epistemología

Ciencia clásica

Ciencia romántica

Evaluación clínica

Funções executivas

Neurofenomenologia

Neuropsicologia

Cognição corpórea

Epistemología

Ciência clássica

Ciência romântica

Avaliação clínica

Carmen G. Armengol de la Miyar - 2014

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id metarevistapublica_ucatolica_actacolombianadepsicologia_84_article_166
record_format ojs
spelling Perspectivas epistemológicas en el estudio científico y la evaluación clínica de las funciones ejecutivas.
Epistemological perspectives in the scientific study and evaluation of executive function.
En este artículo se examinan perspectivas epistemológicas que han moldeado e influenciado la búsqueda científica orientada hacia comprender aquello que los neuropsicólogos denominan las “funciones ejecutivas (FE). El término funciones ejecutivas se refiere a aspectos de control de la cognición y la conducta. Las ideas expuestas en este manuscrito presuponen que la orientación epistemológica de una persona determina la manera en la que ella conceptualiza la interacción entre las funciones cerebrales y su entorno físico. Cada una de esas orientaciones conlleva suposiciones acerca del modo como operan las FE y, por ende, el modo como deben ser evaluadas. Hasta fechas recientes esto se había abordado principalmente desde el punto de vista de dos perspectivas teóricas. Una de ellas, la analítica, tiene sus raíces en el movimiento positivista. La otra, también conocida como “ciencia romántica” es sintética, y provee las bases del trabajo científico del muy celebrado neuropsicólogo ruso A.R. Luria. Una tercera perspectiva, formulada en el marco de la “cognición corpórea”, ha sido propuesta en los últimos 20 años, y está más estrechamente asociada con los trabajos de Francisco Varela. Se examina aquí, por medio de una revisión reflexiva e integradora de la literatura pertinente, la manera como esas tres perspectivas epistemológicas han influido sobre la investigación y la práctica clínica de la neuropsicología.
In this article, epistemological perspectives that have shaped and affected the scientific quest for understanding what neuropsychologists term “executive functions” are reviewed. Executive functions refer to the control functions of cognition and behavior. The underlying thesis of the paper is that one’s epistemological orientation determines how one sees the interaction between brain functions and our status in the world. Each different orientation thus carries with it implications with regard to how executive functions operate, as well as how, therefore, one should try to assess them. Until recently, these functions were approached through two primary epistemological points of view. One is analytic, which has its roots in the positivistic movement. The other approach is synthetic, otherwise known as “romantic science”, and forms the basis of the work of the prominent Russian neuropsychologist A.R. Luria. A third epistemological perspective, articulated under the umbrella of ‘embodied cognition’ approaches, has been advanced in the last 20 years, and is associated most closely with the work of Francisco Varela. A review of, and reflection on how these perspectives have affected research and clinical practice in neuropsychology is provided.
Armengol de la Miyar, Carmen G.
Moes, Elisabeth J.
Executive functions
Neurophenomenology
Neuropsychology
Embodied cognition
Epistemology
Classical science
Romantic science
Clinical evaluation
Funciones ejecutivas
Neurofenomenología
Neuropsicología
Cognición corpórea
Epistemología
Ciencia clásica
Ciencia romántica
Evaluación clínica
Funções executivas
Neurofenomenologia
Neuropsicologia
Cognição corpórea
Epistemología
Ciência clássica
Ciência romântica
Avaliação clínica
17
2
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2014-07-01T00:00:00Z
2014-07-01T00:00:00Z
2014-07-01
application/pdf
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Acta Colombiana de Psicología
0123-9155
1909-9711
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/166
10.14718/ACP.2014.17.2.8
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2014.17.2.8
eng
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Carmen G. Armengol de la Miyar - 2014
69
79
Armengol, C.G. (2007). Executive functions in Hispanics: Towards an ecological neuro-psychology. In: B.P. Uzzell, M. Ponton & A. Ardila (Eds.), International Handbook of Cross-cultural Neuropsychology (pp.163-180). Nahawah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Armengol, C.G., Kaplan, E. & Moes, E.J. (2003). Neuropsychological Assessment. In: R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Assessment. London, England: Sage.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H.,Tranel, D. & Damasio, A.R. (2007). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275,1293-1295.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H. & Damasio, A.R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitogrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 295-307.
Benton, A.L. (1991). The prefrontal region: Its early history. In: H.S. Lewis, H. M. Eisenberg & A. L. Benton (Eds.), Frontal lobe function and dysfunction (pp. 3-32). New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Bilder, R.M. (2012). Executive control: Balancing stability and flexibility via the duality of evolutionary neuroanatomical trends. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14, 39-47.
Boring, E.G. (1950). A History of Experimental Psychology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Christensen, A.L. (1975). Luria’s neuropsychological investigation. New York, N.Y.: Spectrum.
Cole, M. (1990). Alexandr Romanovich Luria: Cultural psychologist. In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. 11-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cowart, M. (2005). Embodied Cognition. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy ISSN 2161- 0002, http://www.iep.utm.edu/embodcog/.
Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York, N.Y.: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Delis, D. & Kaplan, E. (1982). The assessment of aphasia with the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: A case critique. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 32-39.
Delis, D.C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J.H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Denckla, M.B. (1996). AS theory and model of executive function: A neuropsychological perspective. In: G.R. Lyon and N.A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, Memory and Executive Functions (pp. 263-278). Baltimore: Brookes.
Fortuny, L.A.I., Garolera, M., Hermosillo, D., et. al. (2005). Research with Spanish-speaking populations in the United States: Lost in the translation; a commentary and a plea. Neuropsychology, 27, 555- 564.
Goldberg, E. (1990a). Tribute to Alexander Romanovich Luria (1902-1977). In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. 1-10). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goldberg, E. (1990b). Higher cortical functions in humans: A gradient approach. In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. 229-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Golden, C.G., Purisch, A.D. & Hammeke, T.A. (1985). A Manual for the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery Forms I and II. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Guski-Leinwand, S. (2009). Becoming a science: The loss of the scientific approach of Völkerpsychologie. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal Of Psychology, 217, 79-84.
James, W. (1902/2012). The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, E., (1988). A process approach to neuropsychological assessment. In T. Boll & B.K. Bryant (Eds.). Clinical Neuropsychology and Brain Function: Research, Measurement, and Practice (pp. 129-167). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Kaplan, E. (2002). Serendipity in science: A personal account. In: T. Stringer, E. Cooley, & A. L. Christensen (Eds.), Pathways to Prominence in Neuropsychology: Reflections of Twentieth Century Pioneers. (pp. 157-170), New York, N.Y.: Psychology Press.
Kaplan, E., Fein, D., Morris. R. & Delis, D. (1991). WAIS-R as a Neuropsychological Instrument. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Lezak, M.D, Howieson, D., Bigler, E., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment (5th ed.). New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Luria, A.R. (1966). Higher Cortical Functions in Man. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.
Luria, A.R. (1973a). The Working Brain: An Introduction to Neuropsychology. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.
Luria, A.R. (1973b). The frontal lobes and the regulation of behavior. In K. H. Pribran & A. R. Luria (Eds.), Psychophysiology of the Frontal Lobes. New York, N.Y.: Academic Press.
Luria, A. R., Cole, M., & Cole, S. (1979).The Making of mind: A Personal Account of Soviet Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Manly, J.J., (2005). Advantages and disadvantages of separate norms for African Americans. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 19, 270–275.
McKay, P.F. (2003). The effects of demographic variables and stereotype threat on Black/White differences in cognitive ability test performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 1–14.
McNerney, S. (2011). A brief guide to embodied cognition: why you are not your brain. Scientific American, Nov. 4,1.
Manrique-Tisnés, H. (2008). Saber y conocimiento: Una aproximación plural. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 11, 89-100.
Miller, G.A., Galanter, E. & Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior New York, N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Murzi, M. (2005). The Vienna Circle. Available at http://www.iep.utm.edu/v/viennaci.htm. Accessed May 18, 2014.
Pribram, K.H. (1973). The primate frontal cortex-executive of the brain. In: K.H. Pribram & A.R. Luria (Eds.). Psychophysiology of the Frontal Lobes (pp. 293-231). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Pribram, K.H. (1990). The frontal cortex-A Luria/Pribram rapprochement. In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Comtemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. 77-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ribe, N. & Steinle, F. (2002). Exploratory experimentation: Goethe, Land, and color theory. Physics Today, 55, 43.
Richardson, A. (2001). British Romanticism and the Science of the Mind. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, O. (1990). Luria and “romantic science.” In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary Neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Sedó, M.A. (2007). FTD- Test de los Cinco Dígitos. Madrid, Spain: TEA Editores.
Sedó, M.A. & DeCristóforo, L. (2001). All language verbal tests free from linguistic barriers. Revista Española de Neuropsicología, 3, 68-82.
Sepper, D.L. (2005) Goethe and the Poetics of Science. Janus Head, 8, 207-227.
Spiers, P. A. (1981). Have they come to praise Luria or to bury him? The Luria-Nebraska Battery controversy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 331-341.
Stanley, S (2012). Intimate distances: William James’ introspection, Buddhist mindfulness, and experiential inquiry. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 201-211.
Taylor, E.I. (2012). Science, philosophy and religion in psychology, the legacy of William James, In: W.R. Rieber (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the History of Psychological Theories. (pp. 976-984). New York, N.Y.: Springer.
Varela, F.J., Thompson, E & Rosch, E. (1991) The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Varela, F.J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, 330-349.
Wahl, D.C. (2005). “Zartre Empirie”: Goethean Science as a Way of Knowing. Janus Head, 8, 58-76.
Welsh, M.C., & Pennington, B.F. (1988). Assessing frontal lobe functioning in children: Views from developmental psychology. Developmental Neuropsychology, 4, 199-230.
Wikipedia, Color Theory. Available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_theory. Retrieved May 8, 2014.
Wilson, R. A. & Foglia, L. (2011). Embodied Cognition. In: E. N. Zalta (Ed.),The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Wong, W. (2009). Retracing the footsteps of Wilhelm Wundt: Explorations in the disciplinary frontiers of psychology and in Völkerpsychologie. History of Psychology, 12, 229-265.
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/166/206
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication
institution UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADCATOLICADECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Acta Colombiana de Psicología
title Perspectivas epistemológicas en el estudio científico y la evaluación clínica de las funciones ejecutivas.
spellingShingle Perspectivas epistemológicas en el estudio científico y la evaluación clínica de las funciones ejecutivas.
Armengol de la Miyar, Carmen G.
Moes, Elisabeth J.
Executive functions
Neurophenomenology
Neuropsychology
Embodied cognition
Epistemology
Classical science
Romantic science
Clinical evaluation
Funciones ejecutivas
Neurofenomenología
Neuropsicología
Cognición corpórea
Epistemología
Ciencia clásica
Ciencia romántica
Evaluación clínica
Funções executivas
Neurofenomenologia
Neuropsicologia
Cognição corpórea
Epistemología
Ciência clássica
Ciência romântica
Avaliação clínica
title_short Perspectivas epistemológicas en el estudio científico y la evaluación clínica de las funciones ejecutivas.
title_full Perspectivas epistemológicas en el estudio científico y la evaluación clínica de las funciones ejecutivas.
title_fullStr Perspectivas epistemológicas en el estudio científico y la evaluación clínica de las funciones ejecutivas.
title_full_unstemmed Perspectivas epistemológicas en el estudio científico y la evaluación clínica de las funciones ejecutivas.
title_sort perspectivas epistemológicas en el estudio científico y la evaluación clínica de las funciones ejecutivas.
title_eng Epistemological perspectives in the scientific study and evaluation of executive function.
description En este artículo se examinan perspectivas epistemológicas que han moldeado e influenciado la búsqueda científica orientada hacia comprender aquello que los neuropsicólogos denominan las “funciones ejecutivas (FE). El término funciones ejecutivas se refiere a aspectos de control de la cognición y la conducta. Las ideas expuestas en este manuscrito presuponen que la orientación epistemológica de una persona determina la manera en la que ella conceptualiza la interacción entre las funciones cerebrales y su entorno físico. Cada una de esas orientaciones conlleva suposiciones acerca del modo como operan las FE y, por ende, el modo como deben ser evaluadas. Hasta fechas recientes esto se había abordado principalmente desde el punto de vista de dos perspectivas teóricas. Una de ellas, la analítica, tiene sus raíces en el movimiento positivista. La otra, también conocida como “ciencia romántica” es sintética, y provee las bases del trabajo científico del muy celebrado neuropsicólogo ruso A.R. Luria. Una tercera perspectiva, formulada en el marco de la “cognición corpórea”, ha sido propuesta en los últimos 20 años, y está más estrechamente asociada con los trabajos de Francisco Varela. Se examina aquí, por medio de una revisión reflexiva e integradora de la literatura pertinente, la manera como esas tres perspectivas epistemológicas han influido sobre la investigación y la práctica clínica de la neuropsicología.
description_eng In this article, epistemological perspectives that have shaped and affected the scientific quest for understanding what neuropsychologists term “executive functions” are reviewed. Executive functions refer to the control functions of cognition and behavior. The underlying thesis of the paper is that one’s epistemological orientation determines how one sees the interaction between brain functions and our status in the world. Each different orientation thus carries with it implications with regard to how executive functions operate, as well as how, therefore, one should try to assess them. Until recently, these functions were approached through two primary epistemological points of view. One is analytic, which has its roots in the positivistic movement. The other approach is synthetic, otherwise known as “romantic science”, and forms the basis of the work of the prominent Russian neuropsychologist A.R. Luria. A third epistemological perspective, articulated under the umbrella of ‘embodied cognition’ approaches, has been advanced in the last 20 years, and is associated most closely with the work of Francisco Varela. A review of, and reflection on how these perspectives have affected research and clinical practice in neuropsychology is provided.
author Armengol de la Miyar, Carmen G.
Moes, Elisabeth J.
author_facet Armengol de la Miyar, Carmen G.
Moes, Elisabeth J.
topic Executive functions
Neurophenomenology
Neuropsychology
Embodied cognition
Epistemology
Classical science
Romantic science
Clinical evaluation
Funciones ejecutivas
Neurofenomenología
Neuropsicología
Cognición corpórea
Epistemología
Ciencia clásica
Ciencia romántica
Evaluación clínica
Funções executivas
Neurofenomenologia
Neuropsicologia
Cognição corpórea
Epistemología
Ciência clássica
Ciência romântica
Avaliação clínica
topic_facet Executive functions
Neurophenomenology
Neuropsychology
Embodied cognition
Epistemology
Classical science
Romantic science
Clinical evaluation
Funciones ejecutivas
Neurofenomenología
Neuropsicología
Cognición corpórea
Epistemología
Ciencia clásica
Ciencia romántica
Evaluación clínica
Funções executivas
Neurofenomenologia
Neuropsicologia
Cognição corpórea
Epistemología
Ciência clássica
Ciência romântica
Avaliação clínica
topicspa_str_mv Funciones ejecutivas
Neurofenomenología
Neuropsicología
Cognición corpórea
Epistemología
Ciencia clásica
Ciencia romántica
Evaluación clínica
Funções executivas
Neurofenomenologia
Neuropsicologia
Cognição corpórea
Epistemología
Ciência clássica
Ciência romântica
Avaliação clínica
citationvolume 17
citationissue 2
publisher Universidad Católica de Colombia
ispartofjournal Acta Colombiana de Psicología
source https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/166
language eng
format Article
rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Carmen G. Armengol de la Miyar - 2014
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references_eng Armengol, C.G. (2007). Executive functions in Hispanics: Towards an ecological neuro-psychology. In: B.P. Uzzell, M. Ponton & A. Ardila (Eds.), International Handbook of Cross-cultural Neuropsychology (pp.163-180). Nahawah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Armengol, C.G., Kaplan, E. & Moes, E.J. (2003). Neuropsychological Assessment. In: R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Assessment. London, England: Sage.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H.,Tranel, D. & Damasio, A.R. (2007). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275,1293-1295.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H. & Damasio, A.R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitogrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 295-307.
Benton, A.L. (1991). The prefrontal region: Its early history. In: H.S. Lewis, H. M. Eisenberg & A. L. Benton (Eds.), Frontal lobe function and dysfunction (pp. 3-32). New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Bilder, R.M. (2012). Executive control: Balancing stability and flexibility via the duality of evolutionary neuroanatomical trends. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14, 39-47.
Boring, E.G. (1950). A History of Experimental Psychology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Christensen, A.L. (1975). Luria’s neuropsychological investigation. New York, N.Y.: Spectrum.
Cole, M. (1990). Alexandr Romanovich Luria: Cultural psychologist. In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. 11-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cowart, M. (2005). Embodied Cognition. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy ISSN 2161- 0002, http://www.iep.utm.edu/embodcog/.
Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York, N.Y.: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Delis, D. & Kaplan, E. (1982). The assessment of aphasia with the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: A case critique. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 32-39.
Delis, D.C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J.H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Denckla, M.B. (1996). AS theory and model of executive function: A neuropsychological perspective. In: G.R. Lyon and N.A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, Memory and Executive Functions (pp. 263-278). Baltimore: Brookes.
Fortuny, L.A.I., Garolera, M., Hermosillo, D., et. al. (2005). Research with Spanish-speaking populations in the United States: Lost in the translation; a commentary and a plea. Neuropsychology, 27, 555- 564.
Goldberg, E. (1990a). Tribute to Alexander Romanovich Luria (1902-1977). In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. 1-10). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goldberg, E. (1990b). Higher cortical functions in humans: A gradient approach. In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. 229-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Golden, C.G., Purisch, A.D. & Hammeke, T.A. (1985). A Manual for the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery Forms I and II. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Guski-Leinwand, S. (2009). Becoming a science: The loss of the scientific approach of Völkerpsychologie. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal Of Psychology, 217, 79-84.
James, W. (1902/2012). The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, E., (1988). A process approach to neuropsychological assessment. In T. Boll & B.K. Bryant (Eds.). Clinical Neuropsychology and Brain Function: Research, Measurement, and Practice (pp. 129-167). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Kaplan, E. (2002). Serendipity in science: A personal account. In: T. Stringer, E. Cooley, & A. L. Christensen (Eds.), Pathways to Prominence in Neuropsychology: Reflections of Twentieth Century Pioneers. (pp. 157-170), New York, N.Y.: Psychology Press.
Kaplan, E., Fein, D., Morris. R. & Delis, D. (1991). WAIS-R as a Neuropsychological Instrument. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Lezak, M.D, Howieson, D., Bigler, E., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment (5th ed.). New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Luria, A.R. (1966). Higher Cortical Functions in Man. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.
Luria, A.R. (1973a). The Working Brain: An Introduction to Neuropsychology. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.
Luria, A.R. (1973b). The frontal lobes and the regulation of behavior. In K. H. Pribran & A. R. Luria (Eds.), Psychophysiology of the Frontal Lobes. New York, N.Y.: Academic Press.
Luria, A. R., Cole, M., & Cole, S. (1979).The Making of mind: A Personal Account of Soviet Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Manly, J.J., (2005). Advantages and disadvantages of separate norms for African Americans. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 19, 270–275.
McKay, P.F. (2003). The effects of demographic variables and stereotype threat on Black/White differences in cognitive ability test performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 1–14.
McNerney, S. (2011). A brief guide to embodied cognition: why you are not your brain. Scientific American, Nov. 4,1.
Manrique-Tisnés, H. (2008). Saber y conocimiento: Una aproximación plural. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 11, 89-100.
Miller, G.A., Galanter, E. & Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior New York, N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Murzi, M. (2005). The Vienna Circle. Available at http://www.iep.utm.edu/v/viennaci.htm. Accessed May 18, 2014.
Pribram, K.H. (1973). The primate frontal cortex-executive of the brain. In: K.H. Pribram & A.R. Luria (Eds.). Psychophysiology of the Frontal Lobes (pp. 293-231). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Pribram, K.H. (1990). The frontal cortex-A Luria/Pribram rapprochement. In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Comtemporary neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. 77-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ribe, N. & Steinle, F. (2002). Exploratory experimentation: Goethe, Land, and color theory. Physics Today, 55, 43.
Richardson, A. (2001). British Romanticism and the Science of the Mind. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, O. (1990). Luria and “romantic science.” In: E. Goldberg (Ed.), Contemporary Neuropsychology and the legacy of Luria (pp. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Sedó, M.A. (2007). FTD- Test de los Cinco Dígitos. Madrid, Spain: TEA Editores.
Sedó, M.A. & DeCristóforo, L. (2001). All language verbal tests free from linguistic barriers. Revista Española de Neuropsicología, 3, 68-82.
Sepper, D.L. (2005) Goethe and the Poetics of Science. Janus Head, 8, 207-227.
Spiers, P. A. (1981). Have they come to praise Luria or to bury him? The Luria-Nebraska Battery controversy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 331-341.
Stanley, S (2012). Intimate distances: William James’ introspection, Buddhist mindfulness, and experiential inquiry. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 201-211.
Taylor, E.I. (2012). Science, philosophy and religion in psychology, the legacy of William James, In: W.R. Rieber (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the History of Psychological Theories. (pp. 976-984). New York, N.Y.: Springer.
Varela, F.J., Thompson, E & Rosch, E. (1991) The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Varela, F.J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, 330-349.
Wahl, D.C. (2005). “Zartre Empirie”: Goethean Science as a Way of Knowing. Janus Head, 8, 58-76.
Welsh, M.C., & Pennington, B.F. (1988). Assessing frontal lobe functioning in children: Views from developmental psychology. Developmental Neuropsychology, 4, 199-230.
Wikipedia, Color Theory. Available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_theory. Retrieved May 8, 2014.
Wilson, R. A. & Foglia, L. (2011). Embodied Cognition. In: E. N. Zalta (Ed.),The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Wong, W. (2009). Retracing the footsteps of Wilhelm Wundt: Explorations in the disciplinary frontiers of psychology and in Völkerpsychologie. History of Psychology, 12, 229-265.
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2014-07-01
date_accessioned 2014-07-01T00:00:00Z
date_available 2014-07-01T00:00:00Z
url https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/166
url_doi https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2014.17.2.8
issn 0123-9155
eissn 1909-9711
doi 10.14718/ACP.2014.17.2.8
citationstartpage 69
citationendpage 79
url2_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/166/206
_version_ 1811200665716785152

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares