¿Qué es la polarización en las ciencias sociales? Una revisión de revisiones
Titulo:

¿Qué es la polarización en las ciencias sociales? Una revisión de revisiones
.

Sumario:

La palabra polarización ha ganado notoriedad tanto en los titulares periodísticos como en las publicaciones académicas, para explicar los conflictos sociales y políticos de los últimos años. A pesar de su relevancia, este concepto se usa de manera indiscriminada, por lo que su significado no siempre resulta claro. En consecuencia, esta investigación busca brindar un panorama general de la polarización en las ciencias sociales, con base en las teorías y variables que soportan su uso académico. A partir de la metodología PRISMA, se realizó una revisión de revisiones en la que se analizaron 56 publicaciones de diferentes disciplinas y bases de datos. Las publicaciones fueron evaluadas en su calidad metodológica a partir de los instrumentos AMS... Ver más

Guardado en:

Acta Colombiana de Psicología

0123-9155

1909-9711

Sabucedo -Cameselle, José Manuel

Barreto Galeano, María Idaly

Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila

UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA

10.14718/ACP.2024.27.2.11

27

2024-07-30

Colombia

polarización social

PRISMA

polarización política

polarización grupal

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2024

id metarevistapublica_ucatolica_actacolombianadepsicologia_84-article-5927
record_format ojs
spelling ¿Qué es la polarización en las ciencias sociales? Una revisión de revisiones
polarización social
Acta Colombiana de Psicología
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Núm. 2 , Año 2024 :Acta Colombiana de Psicología
2
27
PRISMA
Artículo de revista
Sabucedo -Cameselle, José Manuel
polarización política
Barreto Galeano, María Idaly
Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila
La palabra polarización ha ganado notoriedad tanto en los titulares periodísticos como en las publicaciones académicas, para explicar los conflictos sociales y políticos de los últimos años. A pesar de su relevancia, este concepto se usa de manera indiscriminada, por lo que su significado no siempre resulta claro. En consecuencia, esta investigación busca brindar un panorama general de la polarización en las ciencias sociales, con base en las teorías y variables que soportan su uso académico. A partir de la metodología PRISMA, se realizó una revisión de revisiones en la que se analizaron 56 publicaciones de diferentes disciplinas y bases de datos. Las publicaciones fueron evaluadas en su calidad metodológica a partir de los instrumentos AMSTAR2 y SANRA, analizadas mediante un Análisis Estadístico de Datos Textuales. Con base en dichos análisis, se delimitaron definiciones de tres clases y 19 subclases de polarización, se determinó la calidad de las revisiones y se precisaron las variables y teorías asociadas al fenómeno. La mayoría de las revisiones son narrativas, lo cual evidencia poca sistematicidad metodológica. De igual manera, la mayoría de las revisiones pertenecen a la polarización política y solo se encontraron cinco variables en relación inversa a la polarización, lo que evidencia lo poco que se ha estudiado la despolarización.
polarización grupal
Jungkunz, S. (2021). Political Polarization During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 622512. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.622512
Serrano-Puche, J. (2021). Digital disinformation and emotions: exploring the social risks of affective polarization. International Review of Sociology, 31(2), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2021.1947953
Schaffner, B. F. (2011). Party Polarization. In G. C. Edwards III, F. E. Lee, & E. Schickler (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress (pp. 527–549). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559947.003.0023
Roberts, K. M. (2021). Populism and Polarization in Comparative Perspective: Constitutive, Spatial and Institutional Dimensions. Government and Opposition, 57(4), 680–702. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.14
Quirk, P. J. (2011). Polarized populism: Masses, elites, and partisan conflict. Forum, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1428
Pruitt, D. G. (1971). Conclusions: toward an understanding of choice shifts in group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20(3), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031923
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
Pérez Zafrilla, P. J. (2021). Polarización artificial: cómo los discursos expresivos inflaman la percepción de polarización política en internet. RECERCA. Revista de Pensament i Anàlisi. https://doi.org/10.6035/recerca.4661
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976). The Group Polarization Phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83(4), 602–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602
Orian Harel, T., Maoz, I., & Halperin, E. (2020). A conflict within a conflict: intragroup ideological polarization and intergroup intractable conflict. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.013
Nevryuev, A., & Gagarina, M. (2020). “After the Discussion, I am Even More Confident in My Point of View”: An Overview of Studies of Group Polarization. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 8(3), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944x-2020-8-2-6-11
McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576 Moore-Berg, S. L., Hameiri, B., & Bruneau, E. (2020). The prime psychological suspects of toxic political polarization. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.001
Martemyanova, A. (2020). The Effects of Group Discussion and Exposure to Evidence on Political Attitude Polarization: A Meta-Analysis [Undergraduate thesis]. University of Florida. https://ufdc.ufl.edu/es/AA00077086/00001/pdf
Maggino, F. & Fattore, M. (2019). Polarización social. Wiley StatsRef: Referencia de estadísticas en línea, 2, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat08138
Lebart, L., Salem, A., & Bécue Bertaut, M. (2000). Análisis estadístico de texto. Editorial Milenio. Lee, F. E. (2015). How party polarization affects governance. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-072012-113747
Sobkowicz, P. (2020). Whither Now, Opinion Modelers? Frontiers in Physics, 8, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.587009
Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105138
Lamm, H., & Myers, D. G. (1978). Group-Induced Polarization of Attitudes and Behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 145–195). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60007-6
Lamm, H. (1988). A review of our research on group polarization: Eleven experiments on the effects of group discussion on risk acceptance, probability estimation, and negotiation positions. Psychological Reports, 62(3), 807–813. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1988.62.3.807
Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070
Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Welch, V., Kristjansson, E., & Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomized or non-randomized studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ (Online), 358. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008
Vinokur, A. (1971). Review and theoretical analysis of the effects of group processes upon individual and group decisions involving risk. Psychological Bulletin, 76(4), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031568
Stewart, A.J., McCarty, N., Bryson, J.J. (2020). Polarization under rising inequality and economic decline. Science Advances, 6(50), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd420
Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020). Political Effects of the Internet and social media. Annual Review of Economics, 12, 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239
Text
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Wojcieszak, M. (2016). Polarization, Political. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication (1st ed., pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc168
Sunstein, C. R. (2022). The Law of Group Polarization. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00148
Wilson, A. E., Parker, V., & Feinberg, M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.005
Wheeler, N. E., Allidina, S., Long, E. U., Schneider, S. P., Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2020). Ideology and predictive processing: coordination, bias, and polarization in socially constrained error minimization. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.002
Weber, T. J., Hydock, C., Ding, W., Gardner, M., Jacob, P., Mandel, N., Sprott, D. E., & van Steenburg, E. (2021). Political Polarization: Challenges, Opportunities, and Hope for Consumer Welfare, Marketers, and Public Policy. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 40(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915621991103
Waisbord, S. (2020). ¿Es válido atribuir la polarización política a la comunicación digital? Sobre burbujas, plataformas y polarización afectiva. Revista de la Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Político, 14(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.46468/rsaap.14.2.A1
Jones, P. E., & Roelofsma, P. H. M. P. (2000). The potential for social contextual and group biases in team decision-making: Biases, conditions and psychological mechanisms. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1129–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130050084914
van Bavel, J. J., Rathje, S., Harris, E., Robertson, C., & Sternisko, A. (2021). How social media shapes polarization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(11), 913–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.013
van Baar, J. M., & FeldmanHall, O. (2022). The polarized mind in context: Interdisciplinary approaches to the psychology of political polarization. American Psychologist, 77(3), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000814
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x
Thornal, K. (2015). Partisan media and polarized politics: A meta-analysis of the relationship between partisan selective exposure and political polarization [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gonzaga University.
Talisse, R. B. (2020). Problems of polarization. In Overdoing Democracy: Why We Must Put Politics in its Place (pp. 209–225). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893338.003.0012
Jost, J.T., Baldassarri, D.S. & Druckman, J.N. (2022). Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563–588. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/5927
Axelrod, R. (1997). The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(2), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002797041002001
Amiel, Y., Cowell, F., & Ramos, X. (2009). Poles apart? An analysis of the meaning of polarization. Review of Income and Wealth, 56, 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00361.x
Iandoli, L., Primario, S., & Zollo, G. (2021). The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120924 Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group Polarization: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personally and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1141–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2024
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Inglés
text/xml
Banisch, S. & Olbrich, E. (2019). Opinion polarization by learning from social feedback. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 43(2), 76-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2018.1517761
application/pdf
text/html
Journal article
PRISMA
social polarization
political polarization
group polarization
The word polarization has gained notoriety both in journalistic headlines and academic publications to explain the social and political conflicts of recent years. Despite its relevance, this concept is used indiscriminately, so its meaning is not always clear. Consequently, this research aims to provide an overview of polarization in the social sciences, in terms of characteristics of polarization, theories, and associated variables that support its academic use. A review of reviews was carried out using the PRISMA methodology. 56 publications from different disciplines and databases were analyzed. The methodological quality of the publications was evaluated using the AMSTAR2 and SANRA instruments. The publications were analyzed by statistical analysis of textual data. Based on these analyses, definitions of three classes and 19 subclasses of polarization were defined. The quality of the reviews was determined, and the variables and theories associated with the phenomenon were specified. Most of the reviews are narratives, which show little methodological systematicity. Similarly, most of the reviews relate to political polarization, and only five variables were found to be inversely related to polarization, which shows how little depolarization has been studied.
Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8
Adams, J. F., & Rexford, N. J. (2017). Electoral systems and issue polarization. In E. S. Herron, R. J. Pekkanen, & M. S. Shugart (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems (pp. 247–261). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190258658.013.24
Barnir, A. (1998). Can group-and issue-related factors predict choice shift? A Meta-Analysis of Group Decisions on Life Dilemmas. Small Group Research, 29(3), 308–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496498293002
Dion, K. L., Baron, R. S., & Miller, N. (1970). Why do Groups Make Riskier Decisions Than Individuals? Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 305–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60094-5
Hetherington, M. J. (2009). Review article: Putting polarization in perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 413–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000501
Guan, T., Liu, T., & Yang, Y. (2021). Moving Away From Partisanship: Diversifying the Motives Behind Political Polarization. Political Studies Review, 19(4), 656-667. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920921650
Grünhage, T., & Reuter, M. (2021). Tell Me Who You Vote for, and I’ll Tell You Who You Are? The Associations of Political Orientation with Personality and Prosocial Behavior and the Plausibility of Evolutionary Approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.656725
Gigliarano, C. (2018). Income and social polarization: empirical findings. In D’Ambrosio Conchita (Ed.), Handbook of research on economic and social well-being (pp. 460-479). Edward Elgar.
What is Polarization in the Social Sciences? A Scoping Review of Reviews
Fernbach, P. M., & van Boven, L. (2022). False polarization: Cognitive mechanisms and potential solutions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.005
Farina, C. R. (2015). Congressional polarization: terminal constitutional dysfunction? Law Review, 115(7), 1689–1738. https://columbialawreview.org/content/congressional-polarization-terminal-constitutional-dysfunction-2/
Esteban, J., & Schneider, G. (2008). Polarization and conflict: Theoretical and empirical issues. Journal of Peace Research, 45(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343307087168
Barreto, I. (2020). Análisis estadístico de datos textuales. In P. Páramo (Ed.), La investigación en ciencias sociales: la historia del método y su filosofía (pp. 449–467). Lemoine Editores.
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have Americans’ social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 690–755. https://doi.org/10.1086/230995
Publication
Benedek, J., & Moldovan, A. (2015). Economic convergence and polarization: Towards a multi-dimensional approach. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 64(3), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.3
Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed. Journal of Management, 17(2), 345–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700205
Deutsch, J., & Silbe, J. (2010). Income polarization: measurement, determinants, and implications. Review of Income and Wealth, 56(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00359.x
Dalton, R. J. (1987). Generational change in elite political beliefs: The growth of ideological polarization. The Journal of Politics, 49(4), 976–997. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130780
Bliuc, A. M., Bouguettaya, A., & Felise, K. D. (2021). Online Intergroup Polarization Across Political Fault Lines: An Integrative Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641215
Boccia Artieri, G., García-Bilbao, P. A., & La Rocca, G. (2021). Rethinking affective polarization and sharing of emotions in digital platform ecosystems. Theories and research practices. International Review of Sociology, 31(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2021.1947949
Bordonaba-Plou, D. (2019). Polarización como impermeabilidad: cuando las razones ajenas no importan. Cinta de Moebio, 66, 295–309. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2019000300295
Bramson, A., Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Berger, W. J., Sack, G., Fisher, S., Flocken, C., & Holman, B. (2017). Understanding Polarization: Meanings, Measures, and Model Evaluation. Philosophy of Science, 84(1), 115–159. https://doi.org/10.1086/688938 Bramson, A., Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Fisher, S., Berger, W., Sack, G., & Flocken, C. (2016). Disambiguation of social polarization concepts and measures. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 40(2), 80–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2016.1147443
2024-07-30T00:00:00Z
10.14718/ACP.2024.27.2.11
2024-07-30T00:00:00Z
1909-9711
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/5927/5660
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/5927/5449
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/5927/5636
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2024.27.2.11
0123-9155
2024-07-30
institution UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADCATOLICADECOLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Acta Colombiana de Psicología
title ¿Qué es la polarización en las ciencias sociales? Una revisión de revisiones
spellingShingle ¿Qué es la polarización en las ciencias sociales? Una revisión de revisiones
Sabucedo -Cameselle, José Manuel
Barreto Galeano, María Idaly
Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila
polarización social
PRISMA
polarización política
polarización grupal
PRISMA
social polarization
political polarization
group polarization
title_short ¿Qué es la polarización en las ciencias sociales? Una revisión de revisiones
title_full ¿Qué es la polarización en las ciencias sociales? Una revisión de revisiones
title_fullStr ¿Qué es la polarización en las ciencias sociales? Una revisión de revisiones
title_full_unstemmed ¿Qué es la polarización en las ciencias sociales? Una revisión de revisiones
title_sort ¿qué es la polarización en las ciencias sociales? una revisión de revisiones
title_eng What is Polarization in the Social Sciences? A Scoping Review of Reviews
description La palabra polarización ha ganado notoriedad tanto en los titulares periodísticos como en las publicaciones académicas, para explicar los conflictos sociales y políticos de los últimos años. A pesar de su relevancia, este concepto se usa de manera indiscriminada, por lo que su significado no siempre resulta claro. En consecuencia, esta investigación busca brindar un panorama general de la polarización en las ciencias sociales, con base en las teorías y variables que soportan su uso académico. A partir de la metodología PRISMA, se realizó una revisión de revisiones en la que se analizaron 56 publicaciones de diferentes disciplinas y bases de datos. Las publicaciones fueron evaluadas en su calidad metodológica a partir de los instrumentos AMSTAR2 y SANRA, analizadas mediante un Análisis Estadístico de Datos Textuales. Con base en dichos análisis, se delimitaron definiciones de tres clases y 19 subclases de polarización, se determinó la calidad de las revisiones y se precisaron las variables y teorías asociadas al fenómeno. La mayoría de las revisiones son narrativas, lo cual evidencia poca sistematicidad metodológica. De igual manera, la mayoría de las revisiones pertenecen a la polarización política y solo se encontraron cinco variables en relación inversa a la polarización, lo que evidencia lo poco que se ha estudiado la despolarización.
description_eng The word polarization has gained notoriety both in journalistic headlines and academic publications to explain the social and political conflicts of recent years. Despite its relevance, this concept is used indiscriminately, so its meaning is not always clear. Consequently, this research aims to provide an overview of polarization in the social sciences, in terms of characteristics of polarization, theories, and associated variables that support its academic use. A review of reviews was carried out using the PRISMA methodology. 56 publications from different disciplines and databases were analyzed. The methodological quality of the publications was evaluated using the AMSTAR2 and SANRA instruments. The publications were analyzed by statistical analysis of textual data. Based on these analyses, definitions of three classes and 19 subclasses of polarization were defined. The quality of the reviews was determined, and the variables and theories associated with the phenomenon were specified. Most of the reviews are narratives, which show little methodological systematicity. Similarly, most of the reviews relate to political polarization, and only five variables were found to be inversely related to polarization, which shows how little depolarization has been studied.
author Sabucedo -Cameselle, José Manuel
Barreto Galeano, María Idaly
Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila
author_facet Sabucedo -Cameselle, José Manuel
Barreto Galeano, María Idaly
Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila
topicspa_str_mv polarización social
PRISMA
polarización política
polarización grupal
topic polarización social
PRISMA
polarización política
polarización grupal
PRISMA
social polarization
political polarization
group polarization
topic_facet polarización social
PRISMA
polarización política
polarización grupal
PRISMA
social polarization
political polarization
group polarization
citationvolume 27
citationissue 2
citationedition Núm. 2 , Año 2024 :Acta Colombiana de Psicología
publisher Universidad Católica de Colombia
ispartofjournal Acta Colombiana de Psicología
source https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/5927
language Inglés
format Article
rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2024
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
references_eng Jungkunz, S. (2021). Political Polarization During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 622512. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.622512
Serrano-Puche, J. (2021). Digital disinformation and emotions: exploring the social risks of affective polarization. International Review of Sociology, 31(2), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2021.1947953
Schaffner, B. F. (2011). Party Polarization. In G. C. Edwards III, F. E. Lee, & E. Schickler (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress (pp. 527–549). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559947.003.0023
Roberts, K. M. (2021). Populism and Polarization in Comparative Perspective: Constitutive, Spatial and Institutional Dimensions. Government and Opposition, 57(4), 680–702. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.14
Quirk, P. J. (2011). Polarized populism: Masses, elites, and partisan conflict. Forum, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1428
Pruitt, D. G. (1971). Conclusions: toward an understanding of choice shifts in group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20(3), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031923
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
Pérez Zafrilla, P. J. (2021). Polarización artificial: cómo los discursos expresivos inflaman la percepción de polarización política en internet. RECERCA. Revista de Pensament i Anàlisi. https://doi.org/10.6035/recerca.4661
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976). The Group Polarization Phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83(4), 602–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602
Orian Harel, T., Maoz, I., & Halperin, E. (2020). A conflict within a conflict: intragroup ideological polarization and intergroup intractable conflict. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.013
Nevryuev, A., & Gagarina, M. (2020). “After the Discussion, I am Even More Confident in My Point of View”: An Overview of Studies of Group Polarization. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 8(3), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944x-2020-8-2-6-11
McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576 Moore-Berg, S. L., Hameiri, B., & Bruneau, E. (2020). The prime psychological suspects of toxic political polarization. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.001
Martemyanova, A. (2020). The Effects of Group Discussion and Exposure to Evidence on Political Attitude Polarization: A Meta-Analysis [Undergraduate thesis]. University of Florida. https://ufdc.ufl.edu/es/AA00077086/00001/pdf
Maggino, F. & Fattore, M. (2019). Polarización social. Wiley StatsRef: Referencia de estadísticas en línea, 2, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat08138
Lebart, L., Salem, A., & Bécue Bertaut, M. (2000). Análisis estadístico de texto. Editorial Milenio. Lee, F. E. (2015). How party polarization affects governance. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-072012-113747
Sobkowicz, P. (2020). Whither Now, Opinion Modelers? Frontiers in Physics, 8, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.587009
Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105138
Lamm, H., & Myers, D. G. (1978). Group-Induced Polarization of Attitudes and Behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 145–195). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60007-6
Lamm, H. (1988). A review of our research on group polarization: Eleven experiments on the effects of group discussion on risk acceptance, probability estimation, and negotiation positions. Psychological Reports, 62(3), 807–813. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1988.62.3.807
Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070
Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Welch, V., Kristjansson, E., & Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomized or non-randomized studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ (Online), 358. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008
Vinokur, A. (1971). Review and theoretical analysis of the effects of group processes upon individual and group decisions involving risk. Psychological Bulletin, 76(4), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031568
Stewart, A.J., McCarty, N., Bryson, J.J. (2020). Polarization under rising inequality and economic decline. Science Advances, 6(50), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd420
Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020). Political Effects of the Internet and social media. Annual Review of Economics, 12, 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239
Wojcieszak, M. (2016). Polarization, Political. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication (1st ed., pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc168
Sunstein, C. R. (2022). The Law of Group Polarization. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00148
Wilson, A. E., Parker, V., & Feinberg, M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.005
Wheeler, N. E., Allidina, S., Long, E. U., Schneider, S. P., Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2020). Ideology and predictive processing: coordination, bias, and polarization in socially constrained error minimization. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.002
Weber, T. J., Hydock, C., Ding, W., Gardner, M., Jacob, P., Mandel, N., Sprott, D. E., & van Steenburg, E. (2021). Political Polarization: Challenges, Opportunities, and Hope for Consumer Welfare, Marketers, and Public Policy. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 40(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915621991103
Waisbord, S. (2020). ¿Es válido atribuir la polarización política a la comunicación digital? Sobre burbujas, plataformas y polarización afectiva. Revista de la Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Político, 14(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.46468/rsaap.14.2.A1
Jones, P. E., & Roelofsma, P. H. M. P. (2000). The potential for social contextual and group biases in team decision-making: Biases, conditions and psychological mechanisms. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1129–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130050084914
van Bavel, J. J., Rathje, S., Harris, E., Robertson, C., & Sternisko, A. (2021). How social media shapes polarization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(11), 913–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.013
van Baar, J. M., & FeldmanHall, O. (2022). The polarized mind in context: Interdisciplinary approaches to the psychology of political polarization. American Psychologist, 77(3), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000814
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x
Thornal, K. (2015). Partisan media and polarized politics: A meta-analysis of the relationship between partisan selective exposure and political polarization [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gonzaga University.
Talisse, R. B. (2020). Problems of polarization. In Overdoing Democracy: Why We Must Put Politics in its Place (pp. 209–225). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893338.003.0012
Jost, J.T., Baldassarri, D.S. & Druckman, J.N. (2022). Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563–588. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
Axelrod, R. (1997). The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(2), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002797041002001
Amiel, Y., Cowell, F., & Ramos, X. (2009). Poles apart? An analysis of the meaning of polarization. Review of Income and Wealth, 56, 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00361.x
Iandoli, L., Primario, S., & Zollo, G. (2021). The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120924 Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group Polarization: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personally and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1141–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141
Banisch, S. & Olbrich, E. (2019). Opinion polarization by learning from social feedback. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 43(2), 76-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2018.1517761
Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8
Adams, J. F., & Rexford, N. J. (2017). Electoral systems and issue polarization. In E. S. Herron, R. J. Pekkanen, & M. S. Shugart (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems (pp. 247–261). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190258658.013.24
Barnir, A. (1998). Can group-and issue-related factors predict choice shift? A Meta-Analysis of Group Decisions on Life Dilemmas. Small Group Research, 29(3), 308–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496498293002
Dion, K. L., Baron, R. S., & Miller, N. (1970). Why do Groups Make Riskier Decisions Than Individuals? Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 305–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60094-5
Hetherington, M. J. (2009). Review article: Putting polarization in perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 413–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000501
Guan, T., Liu, T., & Yang, Y. (2021). Moving Away From Partisanship: Diversifying the Motives Behind Political Polarization. Political Studies Review, 19(4), 656-667. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920921650
Grünhage, T., & Reuter, M. (2021). Tell Me Who You Vote for, and I’ll Tell You Who You Are? The Associations of Political Orientation with Personality and Prosocial Behavior and the Plausibility of Evolutionary Approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.656725
Gigliarano, C. (2018). Income and social polarization: empirical findings. In D’Ambrosio Conchita (Ed.), Handbook of research on economic and social well-being (pp. 460-479). Edward Elgar.
Fernbach, P. M., & van Boven, L. (2022). False polarization: Cognitive mechanisms and potential solutions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.005
Farina, C. R. (2015). Congressional polarization: terminal constitutional dysfunction? Law Review, 115(7), 1689–1738. https://columbialawreview.org/content/congressional-polarization-terminal-constitutional-dysfunction-2/
Esteban, J., & Schneider, G. (2008). Polarization and conflict: Theoretical and empirical issues. Journal of Peace Research, 45(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343307087168
Barreto, I. (2020). Análisis estadístico de datos textuales. In P. Páramo (Ed.), La investigación en ciencias sociales: la historia del método y su filosofía (pp. 449–467). Lemoine Editores.
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have Americans’ social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 690–755. https://doi.org/10.1086/230995
Benedek, J., & Moldovan, A. (2015). Economic convergence and polarization: Towards a multi-dimensional approach. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 64(3), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.3
Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed. Journal of Management, 17(2), 345–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700205
Deutsch, J., & Silbe, J. (2010). Income polarization: measurement, determinants, and implications. Review of Income and Wealth, 56(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00359.x
Dalton, R. J. (1987). Generational change in elite political beliefs: The growth of ideological polarization. The Journal of Politics, 49(4), 976–997. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130780
Bliuc, A. M., Bouguettaya, A., & Felise, K. D. (2021). Online Intergroup Polarization Across Political Fault Lines: An Integrative Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641215
Boccia Artieri, G., García-Bilbao, P. A., & La Rocca, G. (2021). Rethinking affective polarization and sharing of emotions in digital platform ecosystems. Theories and research practices. International Review of Sociology, 31(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2021.1947949
Bordonaba-Plou, D. (2019). Polarización como impermeabilidad: cuando las razones ajenas no importan. Cinta de Moebio, 66, 295–309. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2019000300295
Bramson, A., Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Berger, W. J., Sack, G., Fisher, S., Flocken, C., & Holman, B. (2017). Understanding Polarization: Meanings, Measures, and Model Evaluation. Philosophy of Science, 84(1), 115–159. https://doi.org/10.1086/688938 Bramson, A., Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Fisher, S., Berger, W., Sack, G., & Flocken, C. (2016). Disambiguation of social polarization concepts and measures. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 40(2), 80–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2016.1147443
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2024-07-30
date_accessioned 2024-07-30T00:00:00Z
date_available 2024-07-30T00:00:00Z
url https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/5927
url_doi https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2024.27.2.11
issn 0123-9155
eissn 1909-9711
doi 10.14718/ACP.2024.27.2.11
url4_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/5927/5660
url2_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/5927/5449
url3_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/5927/5636
_version_ 1823377479706869760

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares