Corrientes tecnocrática y crítica de las smart cities: Una revisión de sus características
Titulo:

Corrientes tecnocrática y crítica de las smart cities: Una revisión de sus características
.

Sumario:

La smart city emerge como una propuesta para mejorar la administración de las ciudades prometiendo transformarlas en espacios para el desarrollo sostenible. En este contexto el presente artículo busca desarrollar una reflexión teórica sobre el discurso de la smart city desde dos corrientes: la tecnocrática, desde la cual se destacan los beneficios de adoptar el paradigma, y la crítica, en la cual se identifican ideas que cuestionan la adopción del concepto, incluso mostrando aspectos negativos. Para este fin se emplea un enfoque cualitativo de alcance explicativo basado en el análisis de contenido. Los resultados señalan la necesidad de adoptar un enfoque sociotécnico con un mayor énfasis en la participación ciudadana y la interrelación de... Ver más

Guardado en:

Revista En-contexto

2346-3279

2711-0044

Armijo-Perea, Jonathan David

Jurado-Zambrano, Diego Armando

TECNOLOGICO DE ANTIOQUIA INSTITUCION UNIVERSITARIA

10.53995/23463279.1465

11

2024-07-19

Colombia

gobernanza inteligente

smart city

sector público

administración pública

governança inteligente

gobernanza

cidade inteligente

setor público

administração pública

governança

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id metarevistapublica_tdea_revistaen_contexto_76-article-1465
record_format ojs
institution TECNOLOGICO DE ANTIOQUIA INSTITUCION UNIVERSITARIA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/TECNOLOGICODEANTIOQUIAINSTITUCIONUNIVERSITARIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista En-contexto
title Corrientes tecnocrática y crítica de las smart cities: Una revisión de sus características
spellingShingle Corrientes tecnocrática y crítica de las smart cities: Una revisión de sus características
Armijo-Perea, Jonathan David
Jurado-Zambrano, Diego Armando
gobernanza inteligente
smart city
sector público
administración pública
governança inteligente
gobernanza
cidade inteligente
setor público
administração pública
governança
governance
smart city
smart governance
public sector
public administration
title_short Corrientes tecnocrática y crítica de las smart cities: Una revisión de sus características
title_full Corrientes tecnocrática y crítica de las smart cities: Una revisión de sus características
title_fullStr Corrientes tecnocrática y crítica de las smart cities: Una revisión de sus características
title_full_unstemmed Corrientes tecnocrática y crítica de las smart cities: Una revisión de sus características
title_sort corrientes tecnocrática y crítica de las smart cities: una revisión de sus características
title_eng Technocratic and critical currents of smart cities: A review of their characteristics
description La smart city emerge como una propuesta para mejorar la administración de las ciudades prometiendo transformarlas en espacios para el desarrollo sostenible. En este contexto el presente artículo busca desarrollar una reflexión teórica sobre el discurso de la smart city desde dos corrientes: la tecnocrática, desde la cual se destacan los beneficios de adoptar el paradigma, y la crítica, en la cual se identifican ideas que cuestionan la adopción del concepto, incluso mostrando aspectos negativos. Para este fin se emplea un enfoque cualitativo de alcance explicativo basado en el análisis de contenido. Los resultados señalan la necesidad de adoptar un enfoque sociotécnico con un mayor énfasis en la participación ciudadana y la interrelación de actores de la gobernanza, sin dejar de lado la injerencia que tendría la adopción de TIC. Esto se podría ver reflejado en la combinación de los aportes de ambas corrientes para así consolidar mejores formas de administrar las ciudades. Se concluye que ambas corrientes tienen puntos de vista valiosos para ser considerados por los interesados en el desarrollo de las ciudades.
description_eng The smart city emerges as a proposal to improve the administration of cities, promising to transform them into spaces for sustainable development. In this context, this article seeks to develop a theoretical reflection on the smart city discourse from two currents: the technocratic, from which the benefits of adopting the paradigm are highlighted, and the critical, in which the ideas that question the adoption of the concept are identified, even showing negative aspects. For this purpose, a qualitative approach of explanatory scope based on content analysis is used. The results indicate the need to adopt a socio-technical approach with greater emphasis on citizen participation and the interrelation of governance actors, without neglecting the interference that ICT adoption would have. This could be reflected in the combination of the contributions of both currents in order to consolidate better ways of managing cities. It is concluded that both currents have valuable points of view to be considered by those interested in the development of cities.
author Armijo-Perea, Jonathan David
Jurado-Zambrano, Diego Armando
author_facet Armijo-Perea, Jonathan David
Jurado-Zambrano, Diego Armando
topicspa_str_mv gobernanza inteligente
smart city
sector público
administración pública
governança inteligente
gobernanza
cidade inteligente
setor público
administração pública
governança
topic gobernanza inteligente
smart city
sector público
administración pública
governança inteligente
gobernanza
cidade inteligente
setor público
administração pública
governança
governance
smart city
smart governance
public sector
public administration
topic_facet gobernanza inteligente
smart city
sector público
administración pública
governança inteligente
gobernanza
cidade inteligente
setor público
administração pública
governança
governance
smart city
smart governance
public sector
public administration
citationvolume 11
citationissue 19
citationedition Núm. 19 , Año 2023 : EDICIÓN ESPECIAL Territorio, ruralidades y desarrollo
publisher Tecnológico de Antioquia
ispartofjournal Revista En-contexto
source https://ojs.tdea.edu.co/index.php/encontexto/article/view/1465
language Español
format Article
rights Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references Agamben, G. (2011). ¿Qué es un dispositivo? Sociológica, 26(73), 249-264. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/soc/v26n73/v26n73a10.pdf Albino, V., Berardi, U. y Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092 Álvarez-León, L. F. y Rosen, J. (2020). Technology as Ideology in Urban Governance. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(2), 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1660139 Banco Mundial. (2020). Desarrollo Urbano-Panorama general. BM en vivo. https://www.bancomundial.org/es/topic/urbandevelopment/overview#:~:text=En%20el%20mundo%2C%20m%C3%A1s%20del,crecimiento%20y%20proporcionar%20servicios%20b%C3%A1sicos. Barrutia, J. M., Echebarria, C., Aguado-Moralejo, I., Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. y Hartmann, P. (2022). Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121679 Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G. y Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal: Special Topics, 214(1), 481-518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3 Caragliu, A., del Bo, C. y Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117 Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A. y Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 2289-2297. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.615 Cortés-Cediel, M. E., Cantador, I. y Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P. (2021). Analyzing Citizen Participation and Engagement in European Smart Cities. Social Science Computer Review, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319877478 Das, D. (2020). In pursuit of being smart? A critical analysis of India’s smart cities endeavor. Urban Geography, 41(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1646049 Deakin, M., Reid, A. y Mora, L. (2020). Smart Cities: The Metrics of Future Internet-Based Developments and Renewable Energies of Urban and Regional Innovation. Journal of Urban Technology, 27(4), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1868738 Del-Real, C., Ward, C. y Sartipi, M. (2023). What do people want in a smart city? Exploring the stakeholders’ opinions, priorities and perceived barriers in a medium-sized city in the United States. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(S1), 50-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1968939 Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006 Echebarria, C., Barrutia, J. M. y Aguado-Moralejo, I. (2021). The Smart City journey: a systematic review and future research agenda. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 34(2), 159-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2020.1785277 Franco, I. D. (2021). Las smart cities en la agenda del planeamiento y la gobernanza urbana en América Latina. Cuadernos de Geografia: Revista Colombiana de Geografia, 30(2), 280-296. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcdg.v30n2.89479 Galdon-Clavell, G. (2013). (Not so) smart cities?: The drivers, impact and risks of surveillanceenabled smart environments. Science and Public Policy, 40(6), 717-723. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct070 Garnier, J.-P. (2018). La “smart city” o la “cité radieuse” en la era digital. Papeles de Relaciones Ecosociales y Cambio Globlal, 144, 91-103. https://www.fuhem.es/papeles_articulo/la-smart-city-o-la-cite-radieuse-en-la-era-digital/ Giest, S. (2017). Big data analytics for mitigating carbon emissions in smart cities: opportunities and challenges. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 941-957. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1294149 Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R. y Pichler-Milanovic, Nataša Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities Ranking of European medium-sized cities. En Research Institute for Housing, Urban and Mobility Services (pp. 1-22). https://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A. y De Tuya, M. (2021). Information Sharing as a Dimension of Smartness: Understanding Benefits and Challenges in Two Megacities. Urban Affairs Review, 57(1), 8-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419843190 Graham, S. -y Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Techno- logical Mobilities and the Urban Condition. En Routledge (Ed.), Continuing Care Retirement Communities: Political, Social, and Financial Issues. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452202 Grossi, G. y Pianezzi, D. (2017). Smart cities: Utopia or neoliberal ideology? Cities, 69, 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.012 Harrison, C. y Donnelly, I. (2011). A theory of smart cities. In The University of Hull (Ed.), En 55th Annual meeting of the international society for the systems sciences (pp. 1-15). The University of Hull. Hollands, R. G. (2015). Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011 Huang, G., Li, D., Yu, L., Yang, D. y Wang, Y. (2022). Factors affecting sustainability of smart city services in China: From the perspective of citizens’ sense of gain. Habitat International, 128, 102645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102645 Irazábal, C. y Jirón, P. (2021). Latin American smart cities: Between worlding infatuation and crawling provincialising. Urban Studies, 58(3), 507-534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020945201 Jiang, H. (2021). Smart urban governance in the ‘smart’ era: Why is it urgently needed? Cities, 111, 103004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103004 Jiang, H., Geertman, S. y Witte, P. (2020). A sociotechnical framework for smart urban governance: Urban technological innovation and urban governance in the realm of smart cities. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2020010101 Jiang, H., Geertman, S. y Witte, P. (2022). Smart urban governance: an alternative to technocratic “smartness.” GeoJournal, 87(3), 1639-1655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10326-w Johnson, P. A., Robinson, P. J. y Philpot, S. (2020). Type, tweet, tap, and pass: How smart city technology is creating a transactional citizen. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101414 Jurado-Zambrano, D. A., Velez-ocampo, J. y López-Zapata, E. (2022). Smart governance strategies and their relationships with SDGs in three Latin American cities. Management Research, 21(1), 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-01-2022-1270 Kitchin, R. (2014a). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8 Kitchin, R. (2014b). The Real-Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2289141 Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 131-136. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu027 Kitchin, R. (2022). Conceptualising smart cities. Urban Research and Practice, 15(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2022.2031143 Koca, G., Egilmez, O. y Akcakaya, O. (2021). Evaluation of the smart city: Applying the dematel technique. Telematics and Informatics, 62, 101625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101625 Kolesnichenko, O., Mazelis, L., Sotnik, A., Yakovleva, D., Amelkin, S., Grigorevsky, I. y Kolesnichenko, Y. (2021). Sociological modeling of smart city with the implementation of UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 16(2), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00889-5 Kourtit, K. y Nijkamp, P. (2012). Smart cities in the innovation age. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 93-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660331 Krivý, M. (2016). Towards a critique of cybernetic urbanism: The smart city and the society of control. Planning Theory, 17(1), 8-30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216645631 Lekkas, C. K. y Souitaris, V. (2022). Bureaucracy Meets Digital Reality: The Unfolding of Urban Platforms in European Municipal Governments. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221130857 Luque-Ayala, A., Marvin, S. y McFarlane, C. (2015). Smart Urbanism. Utopian vision or false dawn? (1st ed.). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781315730554/smart-urbanism-simon-marvin-andrés-luque-ayala-colin-mcfarlane Lytras, M. D. y Şerban, A. C. (2020). E-Government Insights to Smart Cities Research: European Union (EU) Study and the Role of Regulations. IEEE Access, 8, 65313-65326. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982737 McFarlane, C. y Söderström, O. (2017). On alternative smart cities. From a technology-intensive to a knowledge-intensive smart urbanism. City Analysis of Urban Change, Theory, Action, 21(3-4), 312-328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1327166 McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Residential Private Government (1st ed.). Yale University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt32bdrv Meijer, A. & Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308 Morozov, E. y Bria, F. (2018). Rethinking the smart city - Democratizing Urban Technology. En Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. Morrow, S. L. y Smith, M. L. (2000). Qualitative Research for Counseling Psychology. En S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Hanbook of Counseling Psychology (3rd ed., pp. 199-230). Mouton, M. (2021). Worlding infrastructure in the global South: Philippine experiments and the art of being ‘smart.’ Urban Studies, 58(3), 621-638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019891011 Nam, T. y Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. The Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research Conceptualizing, June, 282-291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602 Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G. y Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38, 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010 Nicolas, C., Kim, J. y Chi, S. (2020). Quantifying the dynamic effects of smart city development enablers using structural equation modeling. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 101916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101916 Oliver, J. G. (2008). El análisis de contenidos : ¿ qué nos están diciendo ? Rev. Calidad Asistencial, 23(1), 26-30. https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-calidad-asistencial-256-pdf-S1134282X08704640 Przeybilovicz, E., Cunha, M. A., Geertman, S., Leleux, C., Michels, A., Tomor, Z., Webster, C. W. R. y Meijer, A. (2022). Citizen participation in the smart city: findings from an international comparative study. Local Government Studies, 48(1), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1851204 Ranchod, R. (2020). The data-technology nexus in South African secondary cities: The challenges to smart governance. Urban Studies, 57(16), 3281-3298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019896974 Razaghi, M. y Finger, M. (2018). Smart Governance for Smart Cities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 126(4), 680-689. https://doi.org/doi:10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012073 Ruhlandt, R. W. S. (2018). The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Cities, 81(October 2017), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014 Shelton, T., Zook, M. A. y Wiig, A. (2015). The “actually existing smart city.” Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, 8(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/https://academic.oup.com/cjres/article/8/1/13/304403?login=false Siokas, G., Tsakanikas, A. y Siokas, E. (2021). Implementing smart city strategies in Greece: Appetite for success. Cities, 108, 102938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102938 Tironi, M. Sánchez-Criado, T. (2015). Of Sensors and Sensitivities. Towards a Cosmopolitics of “Smart Cities”? Tecnoscienza. Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 6(1), 89-108. http://www.tecnoscienza.net/index.php/tsj/article/view/217 Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York: WW Norton & Company. 384 p. https://ia902508.us.archive.org/21/items/town-planning-mgt-002-by-william-p.-cunningham-urdukutabkhanapk/Smart%20Cities%20By%20Anthony%20M.%20Townsend-urdukutabkhanapk.pdf Vanolo, A. (2014). Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5), 883-898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427 Verrest, H. y Pfeffer, K. (2019). Elaborating the urbanism in smart urbanism: distilling relevant dimensions for a comprehensive analysis of Smart City approaches. Information Communication and Society, 22(9), 1328-1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1424921 Wendling, L. A., Huovila, A., zu Castell-Rüdenhausen, M., Hukkalainen, M. y Airaksinen, M. (2018). Benchmarking nature-based solution and smart city assessment schemes against the sustainable development goal indicator framework. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 6, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00069 Wiig, A. (2015). IBM’s smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility. City, 19(2-3), 258-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1016275 Wiig, A. (2016). The empty rhetoric of the smart city: from digital inclusion to economic promotion in Philadelphia. Urban Geography, 37(4), 535-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1065686 Zandbergen, D. y Uitermark, J. (2020). In search of the Smart Citizen: Republican and cybernetic citizenship in the smart city. Urban Studies, 57(8), 1733-1748. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019847410 Zhang, E., He, X. y Xiao, P. (2022). Does Smart City Construction Decrease Urban Carbon Emission Intensity? Evidence from a Difference-in-Difference Estimation in China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(23), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316097
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2024-07-19
date_accessioned 2024-07-19T00:00:00Z
date_available 2024-07-19T00:00:00Z
url https://ojs.tdea.edu.co/index.php/encontexto/article/view/1465
url_doi https://doi.org/10.53995/23463279.1465
issn 2346-3279
eissn 2711-0044
doi 10.53995/23463279.1465
url4_str_mv https://ojs.tdea.edu.co/index.php/encontexto/article/download/1465/1873
url2_str_mv https://ojs.tdea.edu.co/index.php/encontexto/article/download/1465/1872
_version_ 1813774129040457728
spelling Corrientes tecnocrática y crítica de las smart cities: Una revisión de sus características
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Artículo de revista
application/pdf
text/xml
Tecnológico de Antioquia
Revista En-contexto
https://ojs.tdea.edu.co/index.php/encontexto/article/view/1465
Español
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Agamben, G. (2011). ¿Qué es un dispositivo? Sociológica, 26(73), 249-264. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/soc/v26n73/v26n73a10.pdf Albino, V., Berardi, U. y Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092 Álvarez-León, L. F. y Rosen, J. (2020). Technology as Ideology in Urban Governance. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(2), 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1660139 Banco Mundial. (2020). Desarrollo Urbano-Panorama general. BM en vivo. https://www.bancomundial.org/es/topic/urbandevelopment/overview#:~:text=En%20el%20mundo%2C%20m%C3%A1s%20del,crecimiento%20y%20proporcionar%20servicios%20b%C3%A1sicos. Barrutia, J. M., Echebarria, C., Aguado-Moralejo, I., Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. y Hartmann, P. (2022). Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121679 Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G. y Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal: Special Topics, 214(1), 481-518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3 Caragliu, A., del Bo, C. y Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117 Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A. y Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 2289-2297. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.615 Cortés-Cediel, M. E., Cantador, I. y Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P. (2021). Analyzing Citizen Participation and Engagement in European Smart Cities. Social Science Computer Review, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319877478 Das, D. (2020). In pursuit of being smart? A critical analysis of India’s smart cities endeavor. Urban Geography, 41(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1646049 Deakin, M., Reid, A. y Mora, L. (2020). Smart Cities: The Metrics of Future Internet-Based Developments and Renewable Energies of Urban and Regional Innovation. Journal of Urban Technology, 27(4), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1868738 Del-Real, C., Ward, C. y Sartipi, M. (2023). What do people want in a smart city? Exploring the stakeholders’ opinions, priorities and perceived barriers in a medium-sized city in the United States. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(S1), 50-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1968939 Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006 Echebarria, C., Barrutia, J. M. y Aguado-Moralejo, I. (2021). The Smart City journey: a systematic review and future research agenda. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 34(2), 159-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2020.1785277 Franco, I. D. (2021). Las smart cities en la agenda del planeamiento y la gobernanza urbana en América Latina. Cuadernos de Geografia: Revista Colombiana de Geografia, 30(2), 280-296. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcdg.v30n2.89479 Galdon-Clavell, G. (2013). (Not so) smart cities?: The drivers, impact and risks of surveillanceenabled smart environments. Science and Public Policy, 40(6), 717-723. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct070 Garnier, J.-P. (2018). La “smart city” o la “cité radieuse” en la era digital. Papeles de Relaciones Ecosociales y Cambio Globlal, 144, 91-103. https://www.fuhem.es/papeles_articulo/la-smart-city-o-la-cite-radieuse-en-la-era-digital/ Giest, S. (2017). Big data analytics for mitigating carbon emissions in smart cities: opportunities and challenges. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 941-957. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1294149 Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R. y Pichler-Milanovic, Nataša Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities Ranking of European medium-sized cities. En Research Institute for Housing, Urban and Mobility Services (pp. 1-22). https://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A. y De Tuya, M. (2021). Information Sharing as a Dimension of Smartness: Understanding Benefits and Challenges in Two Megacities. Urban Affairs Review, 57(1), 8-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419843190 Graham, S. -y Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Techno- logical Mobilities and the Urban Condition. En Routledge (Ed.), Continuing Care Retirement Communities: Political, Social, and Financial Issues. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452202 Grossi, G. y Pianezzi, D. (2017). Smart cities: Utopia or neoliberal ideology? Cities, 69, 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.012 Harrison, C. y Donnelly, I. (2011). A theory of smart cities. In The University of Hull (Ed.), En 55th Annual meeting of the international society for the systems sciences (pp. 1-15). The University of Hull. Hollands, R. G. (2015). Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011 Huang, G., Li, D., Yu, L., Yang, D. y Wang, Y. (2022). Factors affecting sustainability of smart city services in China: From the perspective of citizens’ sense of gain. Habitat International, 128, 102645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102645 Irazábal, C. y Jirón, P. (2021). Latin American smart cities: Between worlding infatuation and crawling provincialising. Urban Studies, 58(3), 507-534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020945201 Jiang, H. (2021). Smart urban governance in the ‘smart’ era: Why is it urgently needed? Cities, 111, 103004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103004 Jiang, H., Geertman, S. y Witte, P. (2020). A sociotechnical framework for smart urban governance: Urban technological innovation and urban governance in the realm of smart cities. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2020010101 Jiang, H., Geertman, S. y Witte, P. (2022). Smart urban governance: an alternative to technocratic “smartness.” GeoJournal, 87(3), 1639-1655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10326-w Johnson, P. A., Robinson, P. J. y Philpot, S. (2020). Type, tweet, tap, and pass: How smart city technology is creating a transactional citizen. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101414 Jurado-Zambrano, D. A., Velez-ocampo, J. y López-Zapata, E. (2022). Smart governance strategies and their relationships with SDGs in three Latin American cities. Management Research, 21(1), 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-01-2022-1270 Kitchin, R. (2014a). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8 Kitchin, R. (2014b). The Real-Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2289141 Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 131-136. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu027 Kitchin, R. (2022). Conceptualising smart cities. Urban Research and Practice, 15(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2022.2031143 Koca, G., Egilmez, O. y Akcakaya, O. (2021). Evaluation of the smart city: Applying the dematel technique. Telematics and Informatics, 62, 101625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101625 Kolesnichenko, O., Mazelis, L., Sotnik, A., Yakovleva, D., Amelkin, S., Grigorevsky, I. y Kolesnichenko, Y. (2021). Sociological modeling of smart city with the implementation of UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 16(2), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00889-5 Kourtit, K. y Nijkamp, P. (2012). Smart cities in the innovation age. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 93-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660331 Krivý, M. (2016). Towards a critique of cybernetic urbanism: The smart city and the society of control. Planning Theory, 17(1), 8-30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216645631 Lekkas, C. K. y Souitaris, V. (2022). Bureaucracy Meets Digital Reality: The Unfolding of Urban Platforms in European Municipal Governments. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221130857 Luque-Ayala, A., Marvin, S. y McFarlane, C. (2015). Smart Urbanism. Utopian vision or false dawn? (1st ed.). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781315730554/smart-urbanism-simon-marvin-andrés-luque-ayala-colin-mcfarlane Lytras, M. D. y Şerban, A. C. (2020). E-Government Insights to Smart Cities Research: European Union (EU) Study and the Role of Regulations. IEEE Access, 8, 65313-65326. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982737 McFarlane, C. y Söderström, O. (2017). On alternative smart cities. From a technology-intensive to a knowledge-intensive smart urbanism. City Analysis of Urban Change, Theory, Action, 21(3-4), 312-328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1327166 McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Residential Private Government (1st ed.). Yale University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt32bdrv Meijer, A. & Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308 Morozov, E. y Bria, F. (2018). Rethinking the smart city - Democratizing Urban Technology. En Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. Morrow, S. L. y Smith, M. L. (2000). Qualitative Research for Counseling Psychology. En S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Hanbook of Counseling Psychology (3rd ed., pp. 199-230). Mouton, M. (2021). Worlding infrastructure in the global South: Philippine experiments and the art of being ‘smart.’ Urban Studies, 58(3), 621-638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019891011 Nam, T. y Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. The Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research Conceptualizing, June, 282-291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602 Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G. y Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38, 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010 Nicolas, C., Kim, J. y Chi, S. (2020). Quantifying the dynamic effects of smart city development enablers using structural equation modeling. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 101916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101916 Oliver, J. G. (2008). El análisis de contenidos : ¿ qué nos están diciendo ? Rev. Calidad Asistencial, 23(1), 26-30. https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-calidad-asistencial-256-pdf-S1134282X08704640 Przeybilovicz, E., Cunha, M. A., Geertman, S., Leleux, C., Michels, A., Tomor, Z., Webster, C. W. R. y Meijer, A. (2022). Citizen participation in the smart city: findings from an international comparative study. Local Government Studies, 48(1), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1851204 Ranchod, R. (2020). The data-technology nexus in South African secondary cities: The challenges to smart governance. Urban Studies, 57(16), 3281-3298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019896974 Razaghi, M. y Finger, M. (2018). Smart Governance for Smart Cities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 126(4), 680-689. https://doi.org/doi:10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012073 Ruhlandt, R. W. S. (2018). The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Cities, 81(October 2017), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014 Shelton, T., Zook, M. A. y Wiig, A. (2015). The “actually existing smart city.” Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, 8(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/https://academic.oup.com/cjres/article/8/1/13/304403?login=false Siokas, G., Tsakanikas, A. y Siokas, E. (2021). Implementing smart city strategies in Greece: Appetite for success. Cities, 108, 102938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102938 Tironi, M. Sánchez-Criado, T. (2015). Of Sensors and Sensitivities. Towards a Cosmopolitics of “Smart Cities”? Tecnoscienza. Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 6(1), 89-108. http://www.tecnoscienza.net/index.php/tsj/article/view/217 Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York: WW Norton & Company. 384 p. https://ia902508.us.archive.org/21/items/town-planning-mgt-002-by-william-p.-cunningham-urdukutabkhanapk/Smart%20Cities%20By%20Anthony%20M.%20Townsend-urdukutabkhanapk.pdf Vanolo, A. (2014). Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5), 883-898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427 Verrest, H. y Pfeffer, K. (2019). Elaborating the urbanism in smart urbanism: distilling relevant dimensions for a comprehensive analysis of Smart City approaches. Information Communication and Society, 22(9), 1328-1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1424921 Wendling, L. A., Huovila, A., zu Castell-Rüdenhausen, M., Hukkalainen, M. y Airaksinen, M. (2018). Benchmarking nature-based solution and smart city assessment schemes against the sustainable development goal indicator framework. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 6, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00069 Wiig, A. (2015). IBM’s smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility. City, 19(2-3), 258-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1016275 Wiig, A. (2016). The empty rhetoric of the smart city: from digital inclusion to economic promotion in Philadelphia. Urban Geography, 37(4), 535-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1065686 Zandbergen, D. y Uitermark, J. (2020). In search of the Smart Citizen: Republican and cybernetic citizenship in the smart city. Urban Studies, 57(8), 1733-1748. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019847410 Zhang, E., He, X. y Xiao, P. (2022). Does Smart City Construction Decrease Urban Carbon Emission Intensity? Evidence from a Difference-in-Difference Estimation in China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(23), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316097
19
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Núm. 19 , Año 2023 : EDICIÓN ESPECIAL Territorio, ruralidades y desarrollo
Publication
11
gobernanza inteligente
smart city
sector público
administración pública
governança inteligente
gobernanza
Armijo-Perea, Jonathan David
Jurado-Zambrano, Diego Armando
cidade inteligente
setor público
administração pública
La smart city emerge como una propuesta para mejorar la administración de las ciudades prometiendo transformarlas en espacios para el desarrollo sostenible. En este contexto el presente artículo busca desarrollar una reflexión teórica sobre el discurso de la smart city desde dos corrientes: la tecnocrática, desde la cual se destacan los beneficios de adoptar el paradigma, y la crítica, en la cual se identifican ideas que cuestionan la adopción del concepto, incluso mostrando aspectos negativos. Para este fin se emplea un enfoque cualitativo de alcance explicativo basado en el análisis de contenido. Los resultados señalan la necesidad de adoptar un enfoque sociotécnico con un mayor énfasis en la participación ciudadana y la interrelación de actores de la gobernanza, sin dejar de lado la injerencia que tendría la adopción de TIC. Esto se podría ver reflejado en la combinación de los aportes de ambas corrientes para así consolidar mejores formas de administrar las ciudades. Se concluye que ambas corrientes tienen puntos de vista valiosos para ser considerados por los interesados en el desarrollo de las ciudades.
governança
governance
The smart city emerges as a proposal to improve the administration of cities, promising to transform them into spaces for sustainable development. In this context, this article seeks to develop a theoretical reflection on the smart city discourse from two currents: the technocratic, from which the benefits of adopting the paradigm are highlighted, and the critical, in which the ideas that question the adoption of the concept are identified, even showing negative aspects. For this purpose, a qualitative approach of explanatory scope based on content analysis is used. The results indicate the need to adopt a socio-technical approach with greater emphasis on citizen participation and the interrelation of governance actors, without neglecting the interference that ICT adoption would have. This could be reflected in the combination of the contributions of both currents in order to consolidate better ways of managing cities. It is concluded that both currents have valuable points of view to be considered by those interested in the development of cities.
smart city
Technocratic and critical currents of smart cities: A review of their characteristics
Journal article
smart governance
public sector
public administration
https://doi.org/10.53995/23463279.1465
https://ojs.tdea.edu.co/index.php/encontexto/article/download/1465/1873
https://ojs.tdea.edu.co/index.php/encontexto/article/download/1465/1872
10.53995/23463279.1465
2711-0044
2346-3279
2024-07-19
2024-07-19T00:00:00Z
2024-07-19T00:00:00Z

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares