Emprendimiento sostenible: un análisis bibliométrico
.
Objetivo. Analizar la información contenida en Scopus en el campo del emprendimiento sostenible e identificar la estructura del conocimiento en cuanto a temáticas relevantes y sus tendencias, autores y países líderes y su cooperación. Metodología. Paraello se aplicó un análisis bibliométrico que permitió describir y estructurar los avances, el volumen de producción y los actores más relevantes en el campo objeto de estudio; un campo en etapa de crecimiento con un interés científico por la aceleración de la transición hacia la sostenibilidad en el que predominan las investigaciones sobre negocios, administración y contabilidad. Resultados. El emprendimiento sostenible responde a los retos causados por los actuales patrones de producción y co... Ver más
2389-8186
2389-8194
10
2023-11-07
110
131
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial - 2023
id |
metarevistapublica_revistasceipaco_revistaperspectivaempresarial_80-article-820 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
Emprendimiento sostenible: un análisis bibliométrico Knight, S. (2003). Integrating stormwater management with economic, social, cultural and ecological goals in Christchurch, New Zealand. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 10(3), 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2003.10648589 Parrish, B.D. and Foxon, T.J. (2006). Sustainability entrepreneurship and equitable transitions to a low-carbon economy. Greener Management International, 55, 47-62. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2006.au.00006 Pacheco, D.F., Dean, T.J. and Payne, D.S. (2010). Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 464-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.006 Neumeyer, X. and Santos, S.C. (2018). Sustainable business models, venture typologies, and entrepreneurial ecosystems: A social network perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4565-4579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.216 Muñoz, P. and Cohen, B. (2017). Towards a socialecological understanding of sustainable venturing. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 7, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.12.001 Moya-Clemente, I., Ribes-Giner, G. and Chaves-Vargas, J. C. (2021). Sustainable entrepreneurship: An approach from bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22(2), 297- 319. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.13934 Marenco, A.D. (2018). Análisis de redes sociales e indicadores de producción y cooperación científica. En Ávila, J.H. (Coord.), Cienciometría y bibliometría. El estudio de la producción científica. Métodos, enfoques y aplicaciones en el estudio de las Ciencias Sociales (pp. 119-146). Barranquilla, Colombia: Corporación Universitaria Reformada. Liao, H. et al. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability, 10(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166 Kraus, S. et al. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurship orientation: A reflection on status-quo research on factors facilitating responsible managerial practices. Sustainability, 10(2), 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020444 Koe, W.-L., Omar, R. and Sa'ari, J.R. (2015). Factors Influencing Propensity to Sustainable Entrepreneurship of SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 570-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.404 Klewitz, J. and Hansen, E.G. (2014). Sustainabilityoriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017 Riggio-Olivares, G. (2017). Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica de la República Dominicana (tesis de posgrado). Doctorado en Documentación, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Getafe, España. Keijzers, G. (2002). The transition to the sustainable enterprise. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(4), 349-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00051-8 Hansen, E.G. and Schaltegger, S. (2013). 100 per cent organic? A sustainable entrepreneurship perspective on the diffusion of organic clothing. Corporate Governance, 13(5), 583-598. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2013-0074 Gutiérrez, J.K.R. y Velasco, N.Y.G. (2017). Redes de coautoría como herramienta de evaluación de la producción científica de los grupos de investigación. Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion, 27(2), 279-297. https://doi.org/10.5209/RGID.58204 Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J.M. and Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 194-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006 Gadhia, D. (2011). Indian solar thermal technology- Technology to protect environment and ecology. En Hesselbach, J. and Herrmann, C. (Eds.), Glocalized Solutions for Sustainability in Manufacturing (pp. 40-43). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19692-8_7 Dean, T.J. and McMullen, J.S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003 Daly, H. and Farley, J. (2011). Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. Washington, USA: Island Press. Crals, E. and Vereeck, L. (2005). The affordability of sustainable entrepreneurship certification for SMEs. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 12(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500509469628 El estudio de la producción científica. Métodos, enfoques y aplicaciones en el estudio de las Ciencias Sociales (pp. 95-117). Barranquilla, Colombia: Corporación Universitaria Reformada. Colorado, Y.S. y Pérez-Anaya, O. (2018). La evaluación de la actividad científica: indicadores bibliométricos. En Ávila, J.H. (Coord.), Cienciometría y bibliometría. Pinkse, J. and Groot, K. (2015). Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Political Activity: Overcoming Market Barriers in the Clean Energy Sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 633-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12055 Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (2008). Types of sustainable entrepreneurship and conditions for sustainability innovation: From the administration of a technical challenge to the management of an entrepreneurial opportunity. En Wüstenhagen, R. (Ed.), Sustainable Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 27-48). Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848441552.00009 Carayannis, E.G., Evans, D. and Hanson, M. (2003). A cross-cultural learning strategy for entrepreneurship education: Outline of key concepts and lessons learned from a comparative study of entrepreneurship students in France and the US. Technovation, 23(9), 757-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00030-5 Van Aardt, I. et al. (2008). Entrepreneurship and new venture management. Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press. Text http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Young, W. and Tilley, F. (2006). Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(6), 402- 415 https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.510 van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer Manual version 1.6.16. Leiden, Nederland: Univeristeit Leiden. van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. En Ding, Y., Rousseau, R. and Wolfram, D. (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods (pp. 285-320). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13 Tur-Porcar, A., Roig-Tierno, N. and Mestre, A.L. (2018). Factors affecting entrepreneurship and business sustainability. Sustainability, 10(2), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020452 Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682 Tomás-Górriz, V. y Tomás-Casterá, V. (2018). La bibliometría en la evaluación de la actividad científica. Hospital a Domicilio, 2(4), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.22585/hospdomic.v2i4.51 Tilley, F. and Parrish, B.D. (2006). From poles to wholes: facilitating an integrated approach to sustainable entrepreneurship. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 2(4), 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2006.010214 Terán, E. y Guerrero, A. (2020). Teorías de emprendimiento: revisión crítica de la literatura y sugerencias para futuras investigaciones. Revista Espacios, 41, 7. Terán-Yépez, E. et al. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship: Review of its evolution and new trends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119742 Suárez, Y. y Pérez, O. (2018). La evaluación de la actividad científica: indicadores bibliométricos. En Ávila, J.H. (Coord.), Cienciometría y bibliometría. El estudio de la producción científica. Métodos, enfoques y aplicaciones en el estudio de las Ciencias Sociales (pp. 96-118). Barranquilla, Colombia: Corporación Universitaria Reformada. Soto-Acosta, P. et al. (2016). Sustainable entrepreneurship in SMEs: A business performance perspective. Sustainability, 8(4), 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040342 Simatupang, T.M., Schwab, A. and Lantu, D.C. (2015). Building Sustainable Entrepreneurship Ecosystems. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 26(4), 389-398. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3161598 Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611 Schaltegger, S., Beckmann, M. and Hockerts, K. (2018). Collaborative entrepreneurship for sustainability. Creating solutions in light of the UN sustainable development goals. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.092709 Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E.G. and Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016). Business Models for Sustainability: Origins, Present Research, and Future Avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615599806 Cohen, B. and Winn, M.I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001 Ceptureanu, G.E. et al. (2018). Factors Influencing Sustainable Entrepreneurship in Romanian Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Basiq International Conference: New Trends in Sustainable Business and Consumption, 40-48. Cantos-Mateos, G. et al. (2013). Estudio comparativo sobre la visualización de redes de co-words a través de los descriptores del Science Citation Index y de Medline. En II Congreso ISKO España y Portugal / XII Congreso ISKO España, Oporto, Portugal. empreendedorismo sustentável application/pdf Artículo de revista Núm. 1 , Año 2023 : enero-junio 1 10 desenvolvimento sustentável negócios bibliometria text/xml desarrollo sostenible empresa emprendimiento sostenible bibliometría Angulo-Cuentas, Gerardo Sepúlveda, Juan David Blanco, Dayanna Objetivo. Analizar la información contenida en Scopus en el campo del emprendimiento sostenible e identificar la estructura del conocimiento en cuanto a temáticas relevantes y sus tendencias, autores y países líderes y su cooperación. Metodología. Paraello se aplicó un análisis bibliométrico que permitió describir y estructurar los avances, el volumen de producción y los actores más relevantes en el campo objeto de estudio; un campo en etapa de crecimiento con un interés científico por la aceleración de la transición hacia la sostenibilidad en el que predominan las investigaciones sobre negocios, administración y contabilidad. Resultados. El emprendimiento sostenible responde a los retos causados por los actuales patrones de producción y consumo al incorporar componentes ambientales, sociales y económicos en las acciones empresariales; su estudio se ha centrado principalmente en la sostenibilidad de los modelos de negocios y el análisis de los ecosistemas empresariales. Conclusiones. Las tendencias de investigación, los avances y la estructura de los involucrados permite concluir que el emprendimiento sostenible es un modelo de cambios en el sector empresarial y científico en el que se evalúa el impacto en el ambiente y en las comunidadespara modificar las condiciones existentes a través de la innovación, mejoras comerciales y tecnológicas. text/html Publication Sabaneta: Fundación Universitaria Ceipa, 2014- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Alean Pico, A. et al. (2017). ¿El emprendimiento como estrategia para el desarrollo humano y social? Saber, Ciencia y Libertad, 12(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2017v12n1.1470 Ahmed, A. and McQuaid, R.W. (2005). Entrepreneurship, management, and sustainable development. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 6-30. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2005.007750 Ahmad, N.H. et al. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship practices in Malaysian manufacturing SMEs: The role of individual, organisational and institutional factors. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 16(2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2020.105986 Revista Perspectiva Empresarial Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. Revista Perspectiva Empresarial - 2023 Español Anand, A. et al. (2021). Trends and patterns in sustainable entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric review and research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(3), 106092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106092 https://revistas.ceipa.edu.co/index.php/perspectiva-empresarial/article/view/820 Angulo, G.L. et al. (2018). Ambiente y sostenibilidad: una mirada desde la producción científica. Santa Marta, Colombia: Universidad del Magdalena. Arru, B. (2020). An integrative model for understanding the sustainable entrepreneurs' behavioural intentions: an empirical study of the Italian context. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(4), 3519-3576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00356-x Bischoff, K. and Volkmann, C.K. (2018). Stakeholder support for sustainable entrepreneurship-a framework of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 172-201. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.092714 Bibliometrics Journal article Sustainable entrepreneurship: A bibliometric analysis Sustainable entrepreneurship Objective. To analyze information extracted from Scopus pertaining to the domain of sustainable entrepreneurship and to identify the structure of knowledge in terms of relevant topics and trends, prominent authors and countries of origin, and international collaboration.Methodology. A bibliometric analysis was applied to describe and structure advances, th volume of production, and key contributors in the field examined. This domain is currently experiencing growth and has garnered scholarly attention due to its focus on accelerating the shift toward sustainability, primarily in the business, administration, and accounting areas. Results. Sustainable entrepreneurship addresses the challenges presented by current production and consumption patterns through the integration of environmental, social, and economic aspects into business practices. The study of sustainable entrepreneurship hasprimarily centered on the sustainability of business models and the analysis of business ecosystems. Conclusions. Based on current research trends, advancements, and the organizational structure of entities engaged in this field, it can be inferred that sustainableentrepreneurship represents a paradigm shift within the business and scientific domains.Within this framework, impacts on the environment and communities are assessed in order to modify existing conditions through innovative approaches and the application of commercial and technological advancements. Sustainable development Business https://revistas.ceipa.edu.co/index.php/perspectiva-empresarial/article/download/820/1187 131 https://revistas.ceipa.edu.co/index.php/perspectiva-empresarial/article/download/820/1148 https://revistas.ceipa.edu.co/index.php/perspectiva-empresarial/article/download/820/1139 110 https://doi.org/10.16967/23898186.820 10.16967/23898186.820 2023-11-07T11:14:06Z 2023-11-07 2389-8194 2389-8186 2023-11-07T11:14:06Z |
institution |
CEIPA BUSINESS SCHOOL |
thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/CEIPABUSINESSSCHOOL/logo.png |
country_str |
Colombia |
collection |
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial |
title |
Emprendimiento sostenible: un análisis bibliométrico |
spellingShingle |
Emprendimiento sostenible: un análisis bibliométrico Angulo-Cuentas, Gerardo Sepúlveda, Juan David Blanco, Dayanna empreendedorismo sustentável desenvolvimento sustentável negócios bibliometria desarrollo sostenible empresa emprendimiento sostenible bibliometría Bibliometrics Sustainable entrepreneurship Sustainable development Business |
title_short |
Emprendimiento sostenible: un análisis bibliométrico |
title_full |
Emprendimiento sostenible: un análisis bibliométrico |
title_fullStr |
Emprendimiento sostenible: un análisis bibliométrico |
title_full_unstemmed |
Emprendimiento sostenible: un análisis bibliométrico |
title_sort |
emprendimiento sostenible: un análisis bibliométrico |
title_eng |
Sustainable entrepreneurship: A bibliometric analysis |
description |
Objetivo. Analizar la información contenida en Scopus en el campo del emprendimiento sostenible e identificar la estructura del conocimiento en cuanto a temáticas relevantes y sus tendencias, autores y países líderes y su cooperación. Metodología. Paraello se aplicó un análisis bibliométrico que permitió describir y estructurar los avances, el volumen de producción y los actores más relevantes en el campo objeto de estudio; un campo en etapa de crecimiento con un interés científico por la aceleración de la transición hacia la sostenibilidad en el que predominan las investigaciones sobre negocios, administración y contabilidad. Resultados. El emprendimiento sostenible responde a los retos causados por los actuales patrones de producción y consumo al incorporar componentes ambientales, sociales y económicos en las acciones empresariales; su estudio se ha centrado principalmente en la sostenibilidad de los modelos de negocios y el análisis de los ecosistemas empresariales. Conclusiones. Las tendencias de investigación, los avances y la estructura de los involucrados permite concluir que el emprendimiento sostenible es un modelo de cambios en el sector empresarial y científico en el que se evalúa el impacto en el ambiente y en las comunidadespara modificar las condiciones existentes a través de la innovación, mejoras comerciales y tecnológicas.
|
description_eng |
Objective. To analyze information extracted from Scopus pertaining to the domain of sustainable entrepreneurship and to identify the structure of knowledge in terms of relevant topics and trends, prominent authors and countries of origin, and international collaboration.Methodology. A bibliometric analysis was applied to describe and structure advances, th volume of production, and key contributors in the field examined. This domain is currently experiencing growth and has garnered scholarly attention due to its focus on accelerating the shift toward sustainability, primarily in the business, administration, and accounting areas. Results. Sustainable entrepreneurship addresses the challenges presented by current production and consumption patterns through the integration of environmental, social, and economic aspects into business practices. The study of sustainable entrepreneurship hasprimarily centered on the sustainability of business models and the analysis of business ecosystems. Conclusions. Based on current research trends, advancements, and the organizational structure of entities engaged in this field, it can be inferred that sustainableentrepreneurship represents a paradigm shift within the business and scientific domains.Within this framework, impacts on the environment and communities are assessed in order to modify existing conditions through innovative approaches and the application of commercial and technological advancements.
|
author |
Angulo-Cuentas, Gerardo Sepúlveda, Juan David Blanco, Dayanna |
author_facet |
Angulo-Cuentas, Gerardo Sepúlveda, Juan David Blanco, Dayanna |
topicspa_str_mv |
empreendedorismo sustentável desenvolvimento sustentável negócios bibliometria desarrollo sostenible empresa emprendimiento sostenible bibliometría |
topic |
empreendedorismo sustentável desenvolvimento sustentável negócios bibliometria desarrollo sostenible empresa emprendimiento sostenible bibliometría Bibliometrics Sustainable entrepreneurship Sustainable development Business |
topic_facet |
empreendedorismo sustentável desenvolvimento sustentável negócios bibliometria desarrollo sostenible empresa emprendimiento sostenible bibliometría Bibliometrics Sustainable entrepreneurship Sustainable development Business |
citationvolume |
10 |
citationissue |
1 |
citationedition |
Núm. 1 , Año 2023 : enero-junio |
publisher |
Sabaneta: Fundación Universitaria Ceipa, 2014- |
ispartofjournal |
Revista Perspectiva Empresarial |
source |
https://revistas.ceipa.edu.co/index.php/perspectiva-empresarial/article/view/820 |
language |
Español |
format |
Article |
rights |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. Revista Perspectiva Empresarial - 2023 |
references |
Knight, S. (2003). Integrating stormwater management with economic, social, cultural and ecological goals in Christchurch, New Zealand. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 10(3), 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2003.10648589 Parrish, B.D. and Foxon, T.J. (2006). Sustainability entrepreneurship and equitable transitions to a low-carbon economy. Greener Management International, 55, 47-62. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2006.au.00006 Pacheco, D.F., Dean, T.J. and Payne, D.S. (2010). Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 464-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.006 Neumeyer, X. and Santos, S.C. (2018). Sustainable business models, venture typologies, and entrepreneurial ecosystems: A social network perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4565-4579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.216 Muñoz, P. and Cohen, B. (2017). Towards a socialecological understanding of sustainable venturing. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 7, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.12.001 Moya-Clemente, I., Ribes-Giner, G. and Chaves-Vargas, J. C. (2021). Sustainable entrepreneurship: An approach from bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22(2), 297- 319. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.13934 Marenco, A.D. (2018). Análisis de redes sociales e indicadores de producción y cooperación científica. En Ávila, J.H. (Coord.), Cienciometría y bibliometría. El estudio de la producción científica. Métodos, enfoques y aplicaciones en el estudio de las Ciencias Sociales (pp. 119-146). Barranquilla, Colombia: Corporación Universitaria Reformada. Liao, H. et al. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability, 10(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166 Kraus, S. et al. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurship orientation: A reflection on status-quo research on factors facilitating responsible managerial practices. Sustainability, 10(2), 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020444 Koe, W.-L., Omar, R. and Sa'ari, J.R. (2015). Factors Influencing Propensity to Sustainable Entrepreneurship of SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 570-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.404 Klewitz, J. and Hansen, E.G. (2014). Sustainabilityoriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017 Riggio-Olivares, G. (2017). Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica de la República Dominicana (tesis de posgrado). Doctorado en Documentación, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Getafe, España. Keijzers, G. (2002). The transition to the sustainable enterprise. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(4), 349-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00051-8 Hansen, E.G. and Schaltegger, S. (2013). 100 per cent organic? A sustainable entrepreneurship perspective on the diffusion of organic clothing. Corporate Governance, 13(5), 583-598. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2013-0074 Gutiérrez, J.K.R. y Velasco, N.Y.G. (2017). Redes de coautoría como herramienta de evaluación de la producción científica de los grupos de investigación. Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion, 27(2), 279-297. https://doi.org/10.5209/RGID.58204 Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J.M. and Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 194-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006 Gadhia, D. (2011). Indian solar thermal technology- Technology to protect environment and ecology. En Hesselbach, J. and Herrmann, C. (Eds.), Glocalized Solutions for Sustainability in Manufacturing (pp. 40-43). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19692-8_7 Dean, T.J. and McMullen, J.S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003 Daly, H. and Farley, J. (2011). Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. Washington, USA: Island Press. Crals, E. and Vereeck, L. (2005). The affordability of sustainable entrepreneurship certification for SMEs. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 12(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500509469628 El estudio de la producción científica. Métodos, enfoques y aplicaciones en el estudio de las Ciencias Sociales (pp. 95-117). Barranquilla, Colombia: Corporación Universitaria Reformada. Colorado, Y.S. y Pérez-Anaya, O. (2018). La evaluación de la actividad científica: indicadores bibliométricos. En Ávila, J.H. (Coord.), Cienciometría y bibliometría. Pinkse, J. and Groot, K. (2015). Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Political Activity: Overcoming Market Barriers in the Clean Energy Sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 633-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12055 Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (2008). Types of sustainable entrepreneurship and conditions for sustainability innovation: From the administration of a technical challenge to the management of an entrepreneurial opportunity. En Wüstenhagen, R. (Ed.), Sustainable Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 27-48). Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848441552.00009 Carayannis, E.G., Evans, D. and Hanson, M. (2003). A cross-cultural learning strategy for entrepreneurship education: Outline of key concepts and lessons learned from a comparative study of entrepreneurship students in France and the US. Technovation, 23(9), 757-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00030-5 Van Aardt, I. et al. (2008). Entrepreneurship and new venture management. Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press. Young, W. and Tilley, F. (2006). Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(6), 402- 415 https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.510 van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer Manual version 1.6.16. Leiden, Nederland: Univeristeit Leiden. van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. En Ding, Y., Rousseau, R. and Wolfram, D. (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods (pp. 285-320). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13 Tur-Porcar, A., Roig-Tierno, N. and Mestre, A.L. (2018). Factors affecting entrepreneurship and business sustainability. Sustainability, 10(2), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020452 Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682 Tomás-Górriz, V. y Tomás-Casterá, V. (2018). La bibliometría en la evaluación de la actividad científica. Hospital a Domicilio, 2(4), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.22585/hospdomic.v2i4.51 Tilley, F. and Parrish, B.D. (2006). From poles to wholes: facilitating an integrated approach to sustainable entrepreneurship. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 2(4), 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2006.010214 Terán, E. y Guerrero, A. (2020). Teorías de emprendimiento: revisión crítica de la literatura y sugerencias para futuras investigaciones. Revista Espacios, 41, 7. Terán-Yépez, E. et al. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship: Review of its evolution and new trends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119742 Suárez, Y. y Pérez, O. (2018). La evaluación de la actividad científica: indicadores bibliométricos. En Ávila, J.H. (Coord.), Cienciometría y bibliometría. El estudio de la producción científica. Métodos, enfoques y aplicaciones en el estudio de las Ciencias Sociales (pp. 96-118). Barranquilla, Colombia: Corporación Universitaria Reformada. Soto-Acosta, P. et al. (2016). Sustainable entrepreneurship in SMEs: A business performance perspective. Sustainability, 8(4), 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040342 Simatupang, T.M., Schwab, A. and Lantu, D.C. (2015). Building Sustainable Entrepreneurship Ecosystems. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 26(4), 389-398. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3161598 Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611 Schaltegger, S., Beckmann, M. and Hockerts, K. (2018). Collaborative entrepreneurship for sustainability. Creating solutions in light of the UN sustainable development goals. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.092709 Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E.G. and Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016). Business Models for Sustainability: Origins, Present Research, and Future Avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615599806 Cohen, B. and Winn, M.I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001 Ceptureanu, G.E. et al. (2018). Factors Influencing Sustainable Entrepreneurship in Romanian Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Basiq International Conference: New Trends in Sustainable Business and Consumption, 40-48. Cantos-Mateos, G. et al. (2013). Estudio comparativo sobre la visualización de redes de co-words a través de los descriptores del Science Citation Index y de Medline. En II Congreso ISKO España y Portugal / XII Congreso ISKO España, Oporto, Portugal. Alean Pico, A. et al. (2017). ¿El emprendimiento como estrategia para el desarrollo humano y social? Saber, Ciencia y Libertad, 12(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2017v12n1.1470 Ahmed, A. and McQuaid, R.W. (2005). Entrepreneurship, management, and sustainable development. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 6-30. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2005.007750 Ahmad, N.H. et al. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship practices in Malaysian manufacturing SMEs: The role of individual, organisational and institutional factors. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 16(2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2020.105986 Anand, A. et al. (2021). Trends and patterns in sustainable entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric review and research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(3), 106092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106092 Angulo, G.L. et al. (2018). Ambiente y sostenibilidad: una mirada desde la producción científica. Santa Marta, Colombia: Universidad del Magdalena. Arru, B. (2020). An integrative model for understanding the sustainable entrepreneurs' behavioural intentions: an empirical study of the Italian context. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(4), 3519-3576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00356-x Bischoff, K. and Volkmann, C.K. (2018). Stakeholder support for sustainable entrepreneurship-a framework of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 172-201. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.092714 |
type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
type_content |
Text |
publishDate |
2023-11-07 |
date_accessioned |
2023-11-07T11:14:06Z |
date_available |
2023-11-07T11:14:06Z |
url |
https://revistas.ceipa.edu.co/index.php/perspectiva-empresarial/article/view/820 |
url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.16967/23898186.820 |
issn |
2389-8186 |
eissn |
2389-8194 |
doi |
10.16967/23898186.820 |
citationstartpage |
110 |
citationendpage |
131 |
url4_str_mv |
https://revistas.ceipa.edu.co/index.php/perspectiva-empresarial/article/download/820/1187 |
url3_str_mv |
https://revistas.ceipa.edu.co/index.php/perspectiva-empresarial/article/download/820/1148 |
url2_str_mv |
https://revistas.ceipa.edu.co/index.php/perspectiva-empresarial/article/download/820/1139 |
_version_ |
1813593195684036608 |