Titulo:
¿Influye la comunicación sobre asuntos sociales y políticos en la eficacia política interna y en las expectativas de participación sociopolítica de los adolescentes españoles?
.
Sumario:
La participación de los estudiantes en debates, búsqueda de información, etc., sobre asuntos sociopolíticos, la eficacia política interna y las expectativas sociopolíticas de participación son indicadores de compromiso cívico adolescente. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la influencia de la Participación comunicativa sociopolítica de los adolescentes de España en las Expectativas de participación sociopolítica, de forma directa y a través de la Eficacia política interna según el género. Esta investigación basada en el proyecto “Barómetro OPINA” fué transversal y participaron 4711 adolescentes con edades comprendidas entre los 13 y los 18 años. Los instrumentos utilizados fueron tres escalas que medían los indicadores de compromiso c... Ver más
Guardado en:
2027-1786
2500-6517
15
2023-05-02
39
48
Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología - 2022
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
metarevistapublica_ibero_revistaiberoamericanadepsicologia_8_article_2373 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
¿Influye la comunicación sobre asuntos sociales y políticos en la eficacia política interna y en las expectativas de participación sociopolítica de los adolescentes españoles? Does communication on social and political issues influence the internal political efficacy and the expected sociopolitical participation of Spanish adolescents? La participación de los estudiantes en debates, búsqueda de información, etc., sobre asuntos sociopolíticos, la eficacia política interna y las expectativas sociopolíticas de participación son indicadores de compromiso cívico adolescente. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la influencia de la Participación comunicativa sociopolítica de los adolescentes de España en las Expectativas de participación sociopolítica, de forma directa y a través de la Eficacia política interna según el género. Esta investigación basada en el proyecto “Barómetro OPINA” fué transversal y participaron 4711 adolescentes con edades comprendidas entre los 13 y los 18 años. Los instrumentos utilizados fueron tres escalas que medían los indicadores de compromiso cívico propuestos. Se realizaron comparaciones de media, un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales y un análisis de invarianza según el sexo. Los resultados obtenidos mostraron diferencias significativas en las puntuaciones de Expectativas de participación sociopolítica y Eficacia política interna. El modelo mostró buenos indicadores de ajuste sin efectos de mediación e invarianza según el sexo. Establecer debates sociopolíticos con familiares y amigos o ver noticias explica las creencias que tienen los jóvenes sobre cómo influir en la política y cómo intervenir en un futuro en situaciones que beneficien a su comunidad. Student participation in debates, information seeking, etc., on socio-political issues, internal political efficacy and socio-political expectations of participation are indicators of adolescent civic engagement. The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of the socio-political communicative participation of adolescents in Spain on the expectations of socio-political participation, directly and through internal political efficacy according to sex. This research based on the "OPINA Barometer" project was cross-sectional and involved 4711 adolescents aged between 13 and 18 years. The instruments used were three scales that measured the proposed indicators of civic engagement. Mean comparisons, a model of structural equations and an analysis of invariance according to sex were performed. The results obtained showed significant differences in the scores of Expected sociopolitical participation and Internal political efficacy. The model showed good adjustment indicators without effects of mediation and invariance according to sex. Setting up socio-political debates with family and friends or watching news explains young people's beliefs about how to influence politics and how to intervene in the future in situations that benefit their community. Salado, Vanesa Moreno- Maldonado, Concepción Gaspar, Tânia Rivera, Francisco adolescents; sociopolitical communication; internal political efficacy; expected sociopolitical participation; mediation; invariance. adolescentes; comunicación sociopolítica; eficacia política interna; expectativas de participación sociopolítica; mediación; invarianza. 15 3 Núm. 3 , Año 2022 : Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología Artículo de revista Journal article 2023-05-02T00:00:00Z 2023-05-02T00:00:00Z 2023-05-02 application/pdf Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología 2027-1786 2500-6517 https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.15304 10.33881/2027-1786.rip.15304 https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.15304 spa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología - 2022 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. 39 48 Amadeo, J., Torney-Purta, J. and Barber, C.H. (2004) Attention to Media and Trust in Media Sources: An Analysis of Data from the IEA Civic Education Study, College Park, MD: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, University of Maryland. Arens, A. K., & Watermann, R. (2017). Political efficacy in adolescence: Development, gender differences, and outcome relations. Developmental psychology, 53(5), 933. Barrett, M., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2014). Political and civic engagement and participation: Towards an integrative perspective. Journal of Civil Society, 10(1), 5-28. Beaumont, E. (2010). Political agency and empowerment: pathways for developing a sense of political efficacy in young adults. In L. Sherrod, J. Torney-Purta, & C. Flanagan (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 525–558). Hoboken: Wiley Beaumont, E. (2011). Promoting political agency, addressing political inequality: A multilevel model of internal political efficacy. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 216-231. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255. Cicognani, E., Zani, B., Fournier, B., Gavray, C., & Born, M. (2012). Gender differences in youths’ political engagement and participation. The role of parents and of adolescents’ social and civic participation. Journal of adolescence, 35(3), 561-576. Claes, E., & Hooghe, M. (2009). Citizenship Education and Political Interest: Is there a Connection? In M. Print & H. Milner (Eds.), Civic Education and Youth Political Participation, (pp. 85–102). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Delli Carpini,M. X. ( 2000 ). Gen.Com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 341 – 349. Diemer, M. A., & Li, C.-H. (2011). Critical consciousness development and political participation among marginalized youth. Child Development, 82(6), 1815–1833. Dostie-Goulet, E. (2009). Social networks and the development of political interest. Journal of youth studies, 12(4), 405-421. Eckstein, K., Noack, P., & Gniewosz, B. (2012). Attitudes toward political engagement and willingness to participate in politics: Trajectories throughout adolescence. Journal of adolescence, 35(3), 485-495. Flanagan, C. A., Cumsille, P., Gill, S., & Gallay, L. S. (2007). School and community climates and civic commitments: Patterns for ethnic minority and majority students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 421. Fletcher, A. C., Elder, G. H., & Mekos, D. (2000). Parental influences on adolescent involvement in community activities. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 29–48 Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2004). Entering the arena? Gender and the decision to run for ofce. American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 264–280. Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2007). Examining the gender gap in children’s attitudes toward politics. Sex Roles, 56(3), 133-140. Gaby, S. (2017). The civic engagement gap (s): Youth participation and inequality from 1976 to 2009. Youth & Society, 49(7), 923-946. Gordon, H. R. (2008). Gendered paths to teenage political participation: Parental power, civic mobility, and youth activism. Gender & Society, 22(1), 31-55. Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In Girls at puberty (pp. 201-228). Boston: Springer. Hooghe, M., & Dejaeghere, Y. (2007). Does the “Monitorial Citizen” Exists? An Empirical Iinvestigation Into the Occurence of Postmodern Forms of Citizenship in the Nordic Countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 249–271 Hope, E., & Jagers, R. (2014). The role of sociopolitical attitudes and civic education in the civic engagement of black youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(3), 460–470. Jenkins, K. (2005, June). Gender and civic engagement: Secondary analysis of survey data. Circle Working Paper 41. Medford, MA: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. Retrieved from: http://www.civicyouth.org/PopUps/WorkingPapers/WP41Jenkins.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2021 Kirchler, E., Palmonari, A. y Pombeni, M.L. (1993). Developmental tasks and adolescents ́relationships with their peers and their family. En S. Jackson y H. Rodriguez-Tomé (Eds.), Adolescence and its social worlds (pp.145-167). Hove: LEA. Krampen, G. (2000). Transition of adolescent political action orientations to voting behavior in early adulthood in view of a social‐cognitive action theory model of personality. Political Psychology, 21(2), 277-299. Levy, B. L. (2013). An empirical exploration of factors related to adolescents’ political efficacy. Educational Psychology, 33(3), 357-390. Lopez , M. H. , Kirby , E. , & Sagoff , J. ( 2005 ). The youth vote 2004 . College Park , MD : CIRCLE, University of Maryland . Manganelli, S., Lucidi, F., & Alivernini, F. (2014). Adolescents' expected civic participation: The role of civic knowledge and efficacy beliefs. Journal of adolescence, 37(5), 632-641. Manganelli, S., Lucidi, F., & Alivernini, F. (2015). Italian adolescents' civic engagement and open classroom climate: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 41, 8-18. McDevitt, M., Kiousis, S., Wu, X., Losch, M., & Ripley, T. (2003). The civic bonding of school and family: How Kids Voting students enliven the domestic sphere. College Park, MD: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. McLeod, J., Shah, D., Hess, D., & Lee, N. (2010). Communication and education: Creating competence for socialization into public life. In L. R. Sherrod, J.Torney-Purta, & C. A. Flanagan (Eds.),Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth(pp. 363–391. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Mitra, D. L., & Serriere, S. C. (2012). Student voice in elementary school reform: examining youth development in fifth graders. American Educational Research Journal, 49(4), 743–774. Moreno, C., Rivera, F., Ramos, P., Sánchez, I., Jiménez, A., García, I., Moreno-Maldonado, C., Paniagua, C., Villafuerte, A., Ciria, E., Abate, M., Morgan, A. (2017). Barómetro de Opinión de la Infancia: Manual para su uso. Madrid: UNICEF Comité Español. Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.es/ publicacion/barometro-de-opinion-de-la-infancia-manual-para-su-uso. Accessed 11 Dec 2020. Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communication in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pasek, J., Kenski, K., Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2006). America's youth and community engagement: How use of mass media is related to civic activity and political awareness in 14-to 22-year-olds. Communication research, 33(3), 115-135. Pasek, J., Feldman, L., Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2008). Schools as incubators of democratic participation: Building long-term political efficacy with civic education. Applied Development Science, 12(1), 26-37. Paxton, P., Kunovich, S., & Hughes, M. M. (2007). Gender in politics. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 33, 263-284. Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 175. Rosenthal, S., Feiring, C., & Lewis, M. (1998). Political volunteering from late adolescence to young adulthood: Patterns and predictors. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 477–493. Salado, V., Moreno-Maldonado, C., Moreno, C., & Rivera, F. (2021). The Influence of Developmental Contexts in Adolescent’s Expected Sociopolitical Participation through the Sense of Unity: An Analysis of the Mediation Model Invariance through Sex, Age, and Socioeconomic Status. Child Indicators Research, 1-30. Schulz, W. (2005, September). Political efficacy and expected political participation among lower and upper secondary students. In A Comparative Analysis with Data from the IEA Civic Education Study". ECPR General Conference. Budapest. Schulz, W., Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Losito, B., & Kerr, D. (2008). International civic and citizenship education study: Assessment framework. Amsterdam: IEA. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 International Report: Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower-Secondary school students in 38 countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., & Lee, N. (2009). Communication competence as a foundation for civic competence: processes of socialization into citizenship.Political Communication, 26,102–117. Shani, D. (2009). On the origins of political interest. Princeton: Princeton University. Solhaug, T. (2006). Knowledge and self-efficacy as predictors of political participation and civic attitudes: with relevance for educational practice. Policy futures in education, 4(3), 265-278. Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Amsterdam: IEA. Vecchione, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2009). Personality determinants of political participation: The contribution of traits and self-efficacy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 487-492. Watts, R., & Guessous, O. (2006). Sociopolitical development: the missing link in research and policy on adolescents. In S. Ginwright, P. Noguera, & J. Cammarota (Eds.), Beyond resistance! youth activism and community change: new democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth. New York: Routledge. Wray-Lake, L., & Shubert, J. (2019). Understanding stability and change in civic engagement across adolescence: A typology approach. Developmental psychology, 55(10), 2169. Zaff, J. F., Malanchuk, O., Michelsen, E., & Eccles, J. (2003). Socializing youth for citizenship. Washington, DC: Child Trends. Zimmerman, M. A. (1989). The relationship between political efficacy and citizen participation: Construct validation studies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(3), 554-566. Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599. Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Carpini, M. X. D. (2006). A new engagement?: Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford University Press. https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/download/rip.15304/rip.15304 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |
| institution |
CORPORACIÓN UNIVERSITARIA IBEROAMERICANA |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/CORPORACIONUNIVERSITARIAIBEROAMERICANA/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología |
| title |
¿Influye la comunicación sobre asuntos sociales y políticos en la eficacia política interna y en las expectativas de participación sociopolítica de los adolescentes españoles? |
| spellingShingle |
¿Influye la comunicación sobre asuntos sociales y políticos en la eficacia política interna y en las expectativas de participación sociopolítica de los adolescentes españoles? Salado, Vanesa Moreno- Maldonado, Concepción Gaspar, Tânia Rivera, Francisco adolescents; sociopolitical communication; internal political efficacy; expected sociopolitical participation; mediation; invariance. adolescentes; comunicación sociopolítica; eficacia política interna; expectativas de participación sociopolítica; mediación; invarianza. |
| title_short |
¿Influye la comunicación sobre asuntos sociales y políticos en la eficacia política interna y en las expectativas de participación sociopolítica de los adolescentes españoles? |
| title_full |
¿Influye la comunicación sobre asuntos sociales y políticos en la eficacia política interna y en las expectativas de participación sociopolítica de los adolescentes españoles? |
| title_fullStr |
¿Influye la comunicación sobre asuntos sociales y políticos en la eficacia política interna y en las expectativas de participación sociopolítica de los adolescentes españoles? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
¿Influye la comunicación sobre asuntos sociales y políticos en la eficacia política interna y en las expectativas de participación sociopolítica de los adolescentes españoles? |
| title_sort |
¿influye la comunicación sobre asuntos sociales y políticos en la eficacia política interna y en las expectativas de participación sociopolítica de los adolescentes españoles? |
| title_eng |
Does communication on social and political issues influence the internal political efficacy and the expected sociopolitical participation of Spanish adolescents? |
| description |
La participación de los estudiantes en debates, búsqueda de información, etc., sobre asuntos sociopolíticos, la eficacia política interna y las expectativas sociopolíticas de participación son indicadores de compromiso cívico adolescente. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la influencia de la Participación comunicativa sociopolítica de los adolescentes de España en las Expectativas de participación sociopolítica, de forma directa y a través de la Eficacia política interna según el género. Esta investigación basada en el proyecto “Barómetro OPINA” fué transversal y participaron 4711 adolescentes con edades comprendidas entre los 13 y los 18 años. Los instrumentos utilizados fueron tres escalas que medían los indicadores de compromiso cívico propuestos. Se realizaron comparaciones de media, un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales y un análisis de invarianza según el sexo. Los resultados obtenidos mostraron diferencias significativas en las puntuaciones de Expectativas de participación sociopolítica y Eficacia política interna. El modelo mostró buenos indicadores de ajuste sin efectos de mediación e invarianza según el sexo. Establecer debates sociopolíticos con familiares y amigos o ver noticias explica las creencias que tienen los jóvenes sobre cómo influir en la política y cómo intervenir en un futuro en situaciones que beneficien a su comunidad.
|
| description_eng |
Student participation in debates, information seeking, etc., on socio-political issues, internal political efficacy and socio-political expectations of participation are indicators of adolescent civic engagement. The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of the socio-political communicative participation of adolescents in Spain on the expectations of socio-political participation, directly and through internal political efficacy according to sex. This research based on the "OPINA Barometer" project was cross-sectional and involved 4711 adolescents aged between 13 and 18 years. The instruments used were three scales that measured the proposed indicators of civic engagement. Mean comparisons, a model of structural equations and an analysis of invariance according to sex were performed. The results obtained showed significant differences in the scores of Expected sociopolitical participation and Internal political efficacy. The model showed good adjustment indicators without effects of mediation and invariance according to sex. Setting up socio-political debates with family and friends or watching news explains young people's beliefs about how to influence politics and how to intervene in the future in situations that benefit their community.
|
| author |
Salado, Vanesa Moreno- Maldonado, Concepción Gaspar, Tânia Rivera, Francisco |
| author_facet |
Salado, Vanesa Moreno- Maldonado, Concepción Gaspar, Tânia Rivera, Francisco |
| topic |
adolescents; sociopolitical communication; internal political efficacy; expected sociopolitical participation; mediation; invariance. adolescentes; comunicación sociopolítica; eficacia política interna; expectativas de participación sociopolítica; mediación; invarianza. |
| topic_facet |
adolescents; sociopolitical communication; internal political efficacy; expected sociopolitical participation; mediation; invariance. adolescentes; comunicación sociopolítica; eficacia política interna; expectativas de participación sociopolítica; mediación; invarianza. |
| topicspa_str_mv |
adolescentes; comunicación sociopolítica; eficacia política interna; expectativas de participación sociopolítica; mediación; invarianza. |
| citationvolume |
15 |
| citationissue |
3 |
| citationedition |
Núm. 3 , Año 2022 : Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología |
| publisher |
Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología |
| source |
https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.15304 |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología - 2022 Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references |
Amadeo, J., Torney-Purta, J. and Barber, C.H. (2004) Attention to Media and Trust in Media Sources: An Analysis of Data from the IEA Civic Education Study, College Park, MD: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, University of Maryland. Arens, A. K., & Watermann, R. (2017). Political efficacy in adolescence: Development, gender differences, and outcome relations. Developmental psychology, 53(5), 933. Barrett, M., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2014). Political and civic engagement and participation: Towards an integrative perspective. Journal of Civil Society, 10(1), 5-28. Beaumont, E. (2010). Political agency and empowerment: pathways for developing a sense of political efficacy in young adults. In L. Sherrod, J. Torney-Purta, & C. Flanagan (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 525–558). Hoboken: Wiley Beaumont, E. (2011). Promoting political agency, addressing political inequality: A multilevel model of internal political efficacy. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 216-231. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255. Cicognani, E., Zani, B., Fournier, B., Gavray, C., & Born, M. (2012). Gender differences in youths’ political engagement and participation. The role of parents and of adolescents’ social and civic participation. Journal of adolescence, 35(3), 561-576. Claes, E., & Hooghe, M. (2009). Citizenship Education and Political Interest: Is there a Connection? In M. Print & H. Milner (Eds.), Civic Education and Youth Political Participation, (pp. 85–102). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Delli Carpini,M. X. ( 2000 ). Gen.Com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 341 – 349. Diemer, M. A., & Li, C.-H. (2011). Critical consciousness development and political participation among marginalized youth. Child Development, 82(6), 1815–1833. Dostie-Goulet, E. (2009). Social networks and the development of political interest. Journal of youth studies, 12(4), 405-421. Eckstein, K., Noack, P., & Gniewosz, B. (2012). Attitudes toward political engagement and willingness to participate in politics: Trajectories throughout adolescence. Journal of adolescence, 35(3), 485-495. Flanagan, C. A., Cumsille, P., Gill, S., & Gallay, L. S. (2007). School and community climates and civic commitments: Patterns for ethnic minority and majority students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 421. Fletcher, A. C., Elder, G. H., & Mekos, D. (2000). Parental influences on adolescent involvement in community activities. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 29–48 Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2004). Entering the arena? Gender and the decision to run for ofce. American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 264–280. Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2007). Examining the gender gap in children’s attitudes toward politics. Sex Roles, 56(3), 133-140. Gaby, S. (2017). The civic engagement gap (s): Youth participation and inequality from 1976 to 2009. Youth & Society, 49(7), 923-946. Gordon, H. R. (2008). Gendered paths to teenage political participation: Parental power, civic mobility, and youth activism. Gender & Society, 22(1), 31-55. Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In Girls at puberty (pp. 201-228). Boston: Springer. Hooghe, M., & Dejaeghere, Y. (2007). Does the “Monitorial Citizen” Exists? An Empirical Iinvestigation Into the Occurence of Postmodern Forms of Citizenship in the Nordic Countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 249–271 Hope, E., & Jagers, R. (2014). The role of sociopolitical attitudes and civic education in the civic engagement of black youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(3), 460–470. Jenkins, K. (2005, June). Gender and civic engagement: Secondary analysis of survey data. Circle Working Paper 41. Medford, MA: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. Retrieved from: http://www.civicyouth.org/PopUps/WorkingPapers/WP41Jenkins.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2021 Kirchler, E., Palmonari, A. y Pombeni, M.L. (1993). Developmental tasks and adolescents ́relationships with their peers and their family. En S. Jackson y H. Rodriguez-Tomé (Eds.), Adolescence and its social worlds (pp.145-167). Hove: LEA. Krampen, G. (2000). Transition of adolescent political action orientations to voting behavior in early adulthood in view of a social‐cognitive action theory model of personality. Political Psychology, 21(2), 277-299. Levy, B. L. (2013). An empirical exploration of factors related to adolescents’ political efficacy. Educational Psychology, 33(3), 357-390. Lopez , M. H. , Kirby , E. , & Sagoff , J. ( 2005 ). The youth vote 2004 . College Park , MD : CIRCLE, University of Maryland . Manganelli, S., Lucidi, F., & Alivernini, F. (2014). Adolescents' expected civic participation: The role of civic knowledge and efficacy beliefs. Journal of adolescence, 37(5), 632-641. Manganelli, S., Lucidi, F., & Alivernini, F. (2015). Italian adolescents' civic engagement and open classroom climate: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 41, 8-18. McDevitt, M., Kiousis, S., Wu, X., Losch, M., & Ripley, T. (2003). The civic bonding of school and family: How Kids Voting students enliven the domestic sphere. College Park, MD: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. McLeod, J., Shah, D., Hess, D., & Lee, N. (2010). Communication and education: Creating competence for socialization into public life. In L. R. Sherrod, J.Torney-Purta, & C. A. Flanagan (Eds.),Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth(pp. 363–391. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Mitra, D. L., & Serriere, S. C. (2012). Student voice in elementary school reform: examining youth development in fifth graders. American Educational Research Journal, 49(4), 743–774. Moreno, C., Rivera, F., Ramos, P., Sánchez, I., Jiménez, A., García, I., Moreno-Maldonado, C., Paniagua, C., Villafuerte, A., Ciria, E., Abate, M., Morgan, A. (2017). Barómetro de Opinión de la Infancia: Manual para su uso. Madrid: UNICEF Comité Español. Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.es/ publicacion/barometro-de-opinion-de-la-infancia-manual-para-su-uso. Accessed 11 Dec 2020. Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communication in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pasek, J., Kenski, K., Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2006). America's youth and community engagement: How use of mass media is related to civic activity and political awareness in 14-to 22-year-olds. Communication research, 33(3), 115-135. Pasek, J., Feldman, L., Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2008). Schools as incubators of democratic participation: Building long-term political efficacy with civic education. Applied Development Science, 12(1), 26-37. Paxton, P., Kunovich, S., & Hughes, M. M. (2007). Gender in politics. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 33, 263-284. Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 175. Rosenthal, S., Feiring, C., & Lewis, M. (1998). Political volunteering from late adolescence to young adulthood: Patterns and predictors. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 477–493. Salado, V., Moreno-Maldonado, C., Moreno, C., & Rivera, F. (2021). The Influence of Developmental Contexts in Adolescent’s Expected Sociopolitical Participation through the Sense of Unity: An Analysis of the Mediation Model Invariance through Sex, Age, and Socioeconomic Status. Child Indicators Research, 1-30. Schulz, W. (2005, September). Political efficacy and expected political participation among lower and upper secondary students. In A Comparative Analysis with Data from the IEA Civic Education Study". ECPR General Conference. Budapest. Schulz, W., Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Losito, B., & Kerr, D. (2008). International civic and citizenship education study: Assessment framework. Amsterdam: IEA. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 International Report: Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower-Secondary school students in 38 countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., & Lee, N. (2009). Communication competence as a foundation for civic competence: processes of socialization into citizenship.Political Communication, 26,102–117. Shani, D. (2009). On the origins of political interest. Princeton: Princeton University. Solhaug, T. (2006). Knowledge and self-efficacy as predictors of political participation and civic attitudes: with relevance for educational practice. Policy futures in education, 4(3), 265-278. Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Amsterdam: IEA. Vecchione, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2009). Personality determinants of political participation: The contribution of traits and self-efficacy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 487-492. Watts, R., & Guessous, O. (2006). Sociopolitical development: the missing link in research and policy on adolescents. In S. Ginwright, P. Noguera, & J. Cammarota (Eds.), Beyond resistance! youth activism and community change: new democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth. New York: Routledge. Wray-Lake, L., & Shubert, J. (2019). Understanding stability and change in civic engagement across adolescence: A typology approach. Developmental psychology, 55(10), 2169. Zaff, J. F., Malanchuk, O., Michelsen, E., & Eccles, J. (2003). Socializing youth for citizenship. Washington, DC: Child Trends. Zimmerman, M. A. (1989). The relationship between political efficacy and citizen participation: Construct validation studies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(3), 554-566. Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599. Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Carpini, M. X. D. (2006). A new engagement?: Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford University Press. |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2023-05-02 |
| date_accessioned |
2023-05-02T00:00:00Z |
| date_available |
2023-05-02T00:00:00Z |
| url |
https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.15304 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.15304 |
| issn |
2027-1786 |
| eissn |
2500-6517 |
| doi |
10.33881/2027-1786.rip.15304 |
| citationstartpage |
39 |
| citationendpage |
48 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/download/rip.15304/rip.15304 |
| _version_ |
1811200169309372416 |