Adaptación y validación del Voice Handicap Index y su versión abreviada al español rioplatense de Argentina
Titulo:

Adaptación y validación del Voice Handicap Index y su versión abreviada al español rioplatense de Argentina
.

Sumario:

Objetivo. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo principal validar el Voice Handicap Index (VHI) y su versión abreviada (VHI-10) adaptados al español rioplatense de Argentina, con objetivos específicos centrados en evaluar su fiabilidad y validez. Metodología. La adaptación cultural incluyó técnicas de traducción directa, síntesis y retrotraducción, evaluación de la equivalencia semántica y aplicación a un grupo piloto. Para la validación se evaluó la fiabilidad de ambos índices adaptados mediante la consistencia interna (coeficiente alfa de Cronbach) y la estabilidad test-retest (prueba de Bland-Altman, CCI y r de Spearman). Además, se examinó la validez de criterio y de constructo. 213 sujetos participaron en la validación del índice adaptado de... Ver más

Guardado en:

Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud

2665-2056

Román-Zubeldia, Juana

Farias, Patricia Guadalupe

FUNDACION UNIVERSITARIA MARIA CANO

10.46634/riics.265

6

2024-01-29

127

147

Colombia

Disfonía

autoevaluación

índice

calidad de la voz

calidad de vida

rehabilitación vocal

estudio de validación

psicometría

comparación transcultural

Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2024

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id metarevistapublica_fumc_revistadeinvestigacioneinnovacionencienciasdelasalud_67_article_265
record_format ojs
institution FUNDACION UNIVERSITARIA MARIA CANO
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/FUNDACIONUNIVERSITARIAMARIACANO/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud
title Adaptación y validación del Voice Handicap Index y su versión abreviada al español rioplatense de Argentina
spellingShingle Adaptación y validación del Voice Handicap Index y su versión abreviada al español rioplatense de Argentina
Román-Zubeldia, Juana
Farias, Patricia Guadalupe
Disfonía
autoevaluación
índice
calidad de la voz
calidad de vida
rehabilitación vocal
estudio de validación
psicometría
comparación transcultural
Dysphonia
voice
self-testing
index
voice quality
quality of life
vocal rehabilitation
validation study
psychometrics
cross-cultural comparison
title_short Adaptación y validación del Voice Handicap Index y su versión abreviada al español rioplatense de Argentina
title_full Adaptación y validación del Voice Handicap Index y su versión abreviada al español rioplatense de Argentina
title_fullStr Adaptación y validación del Voice Handicap Index y su versión abreviada al español rioplatense de Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Adaptación y validación del Voice Handicap Index y su versión abreviada al español rioplatense de Argentina
title_sort adaptación y validación del voice handicap index y su versión abreviada al español rioplatense de argentina
description Objetivo. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo principal validar el Voice Handicap Index (VHI) y su versión abreviada (VHI-10) adaptados al español rioplatense de Argentina, con objetivos específicos centrados en evaluar su fiabilidad y validez. Metodología. La adaptación cultural incluyó técnicas de traducción directa, síntesis y retrotraducción, evaluación de la equivalencia semántica y aplicación a un grupo piloto. Para la validación se evaluó la fiabilidad de ambos índices adaptados mediante la consistencia interna (coeficiente alfa de Cronbach) y la estabilidad test-retest (prueba de Bland-Altman, CCI y r de Spearman). Además, se examinó la validez de criterio y de constructo. 213 sujetos participaron en la validación del índice adaptado de 30 ítems (123 disfónicos; 90 de control); 113, en la del índice abreviado (63 disfónicos; 50 de control). Resultados. Se constituyó el Índice de Desventaja Vocal (IDV) como la versión adaptada del VHI al español rioplatense de Argentina. Ambos índices demostraron excelente consistencia interna (IDV-30 α = 0,96; IDV-10 α = 0,92) y estabilidad y concordancia (IDV-30 CCI = 0,95; IDV-10 CCI = 0,96). Se halló alta correlación entre los puntajes de ambos índices y la autoevaluación de la severidad de la disfonía de los participantes (r = 0,85). Ambos índices demostraron capacidad de diferenciar entre individuos con disfonía y sujetos sanos (p< 0,001). El análisis factorial reveló tres factores para el IDV-30 y un factor para el IDV-10. Conclusiones. El IDV-30 e IDV-10 presentan grados adecuados de fiabilidad y validez. Ambos pueden ser incluidos en protocolos de valoración de la función vocal por profesionales de Argentina.  
description_eng Aim. This study aimed to validate the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and its abbreviated version (VHI-10) adapted into Rioplatense Spanish from Argentina, with specific goals centered on assessing their reliability and validity. Methods. Cultural adaptation involved direct translation, synthesis and back-translation techniques, followed by an assessment of semantic equivalence and application to a pilot group. For the validation process, the reliability of both adapted indices was assessed through measures of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) and test-retest stability (Bland-Altman test, ICC and Spearman's correlation coefficient). Additionally, we conducted analyses to asses criterion and construct validity. 213 subjects participated in the validation of the adapted 30-items index, (123 with dysphonia; 90 from control group); 113, in the abbreviated version (63 with dysphonia; 50 from control group). Results. The "Índice de Desventaja Vocal" (IDV) was established as the adapted version of the VHI into Rioplatense Spanish from Argentina. Both indeces exhibited excellent internal consistency (IDV-30 α = 0,96; IDV-10 α = 0,92) and satisfactory stability and agreement (IDV-30 CCI = 0,95; IDV-10 CCI = 0,96). Regarding validity, a strong correlation was observed between the scores of both indeces and the participant’s self-assessment of dysphonia degree (r = 0,85). Both indices effectively differentiated between individuals with dysphonia and healthy subjects (p< 0,001). Factor analysis revealed three factors for the IDV-30 and one factor for the IDV-10. Conclusion. The IDV-30 and IDV-10 demonstrate satisfactory levels of reliability and validity. Both indices can be incorporated into the assessment protocols for evaluating the vocal function by professionals in Argentina.
author Román-Zubeldia, Juana
Farias, Patricia Guadalupe
author_facet Román-Zubeldia, Juana
Farias, Patricia Guadalupe
topicspa_str_mv Disfonía
autoevaluación
índice
calidad de la voz
calidad de vida
rehabilitación vocal
estudio de validación
psicometría
comparación transcultural
topic Disfonía
autoevaluación
índice
calidad de la voz
calidad de vida
rehabilitación vocal
estudio de validación
psicometría
comparación transcultural
Dysphonia
voice
self-testing
index
voice quality
quality of life
vocal rehabilitation
validation study
psychometrics
cross-cultural comparison
topic_facet Disfonía
autoevaluación
índice
calidad de la voz
calidad de vida
rehabilitación vocal
estudio de validación
psicometría
comparación transcultural
Dysphonia
voice
self-testing
index
voice quality
quality of life
vocal rehabilitation
validation study
psychometrics
cross-cultural comparison
citationvolume 6
citationissue 1
publisher Fundación Universitaria María Cano
ispartofjournal Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud
source https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/265
language spa
format Article
rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2024
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, Silbergleit A, Jacobson G, Benninger MS, et al. The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): Development and validation. Am J Speech-Language Pathol [Internet]. 1997 Aug;6(3):66-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0603.66 2. Nawka T, Wiesmann U, Gonnermann U. Validierung des Voice Handicap Index (VHI) in der deutschen fassung. HNO [Internet]. 2003 Nov;51(11):921-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-003-0909-8 3. Woisard V, Bodin S, Puech M. [The Voice Handicap Index: impact of the translation in French on the validation]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) [Internet]. 2004;125(5):307-12. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15856833 4. Amir O, Ashkenazi O, Leibovitzh T, Michael O, Tavor Y, Wolf M. Applying the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) to dysphonic and nondysphonic hebrew speakers. J Voice [Internet]. 2006 Jun;20(2):318-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.006 5. Hakkesteegt MM, Wieringa MH, Gerritsma EJ, Feenstra L. Reproducibility of the Dutch version of the Voice Handicap Index. Folia Phoniatr Logop [Internet]. 2006;58(2):132-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000089613 6. Lam PKY, Chan KM, Ho W, Kwong E, Yiu EM, Wei WI. Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Chinese Voice Handicap Index-10. Laryngoscope [Internet]. 2006 Jul;116(7):1192-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000224539.41003.93 7. Núñez-Batalla F, Corte-Santos P, Señaris-González B, Llorente-Pendás JL, Górriz-Gil C, Suárez-Nieto C. Adaptación y validación del índice de incapacidad vocal (VHI-30) y su versión abreviada (VHI-10) al español. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp [Internet]. 2007 Nov;58(9):386-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6519(07)74954-3 8. Kiliç MA, Okur E, Yildirim I, Oǧüt F, Denizoǧlu I, Kizilay A, et al. [Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Voice Handicap Index]. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg [Internet]. 2008;18(3):139-47. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18984994 9. Yun YS, Kim H, Son YI, Choi HS. Validation of the Korean Voice Handicap Index (K-VHI) and the clinical usefulness of Korean VHI-10. Commun Sci Disord [Internet]. 2008;13(2):216-41. Disponible en: https://www.e-csd.org/journal/view.php?number=357 10. Ohlsson AC, Dotevall H. Voice Handicap Index in Swedish. Logop Phoniatr Vocology [Internet]. 2009 Ene 13;34(2):60-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14015430902839185 11. Malki KH, Mesallam TA, Farahat M, Bukhari M, Murry T. Validation and cultural modification of Arabic Voice Handicap Index. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2010 Jun 9;267(11):1743-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1296-x 12. Helidoni ME, Murry T, Moschandreas J, Lionis C, Printza A, Velegrakis GA. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Greek. J Voice [Internet]. 2010;24(2):221-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.06.005 13. Schindler A, Ottaviani F, Mozzanica F, Bachmann C, Favero E, Schettino I, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Italian. J Voice [Internet]. 2010 Nov;24(6):708-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.05.006 14. Behlau M, Alves Dos Santos LDM, Oliveira G. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Brazilian Portuguese. J Voice [Internet]. 2011 May;25(3):354-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.09.007 15. Xu W, Han D, Li H, Hu R, Zhang L. Application of the mandarin chinese version of the Voice Handicap Index. J Voice [Internet]. 2010;24(6):702-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.05.007 16. Datta R, Sethi A, Singh S, Nilakantan A, Venkatesh MD. Translation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index in Hindi. J Laryngol Voice [Internet]. 2011;1(1):12-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-9748.76131 17. Taguchi A, Mise K, Nishikubo K, Hyodo M, Shiromoto O. Japanese version of Voice Handicap Index for subjective evaluation of voice disorder. J Voice [Internet]. 2012 Sep;26(5):668.e15-668.e19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.11.005 18. Menon U, Sheejamol VS, Cherian MP. Validation of Malayalam Version of the Voice Handicap Index. Int J Phonosurgery Laryngol [Internet]. 2012;2(1):1-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10023-1025 19. Karlsen T, Grieg ARH, Heimdal JH, Aarstad HJ. Cross-cultural adaption and translation of the Voice Handicap Index into Norwegian. Folia Phoniatr Logop [Internet]. 2013;64(5):234-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000343080 20. Bonetti A, Bonetti L. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Croatian. J Voice [Internet]. 2013;27(1):130.e7-130.e14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.07.006 21. Moradi N, Pourshahbaz A, Soltani M, Javadipour S, Hashemi H, Soltaninejad N. Cross-cultural equivalence and evaluation of psychometric properties of Voice Handicap Index into Persian. J Voice [Internet]. 2013 Mar;27(2):258.e15-258.e22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.09.006 22. Trinite B, Sokolovs J. Adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index in Latvian. J Voice [Internet]. 2014 Jul;28(4):452-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.01.008 23. Jaruchinda P, Suwanwarangkool T. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Thai. J Med Assoc Thai [Internet]. 2015;98(12):1199-208. Disponible en: http://www.jmatonline.com/index.php/jmat/article/view/6714 24. Sotirović J, Grgurević A, Mumović G, Grgurević U, Pavićević L, Perić A, et al. Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-30 into Serbian. J Voice [Internet]. 2016 Nov;30(6):758.e1-758.e6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.09.002 25. Sorensen JR, Printz T, Mehlum CS, Heidemann CH, Groentved AM, Godballe C. Cross-cultural Adaption and Validation of the Danish Voice Handicap Index. J Voice [Internet]. 2019;33(4):441-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.01.010 26. Frajkova Z, Krizekova A, Missikova V, Tedla M. Translation, Cross-Cultural Validation of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-30) in Slovak Language. J Voice [Internet]. 2022;36(1):145e1-145e6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.04.003 27. Bourque JM, Defoy L, Batcho CS, Tremblay P, Gagnon S, Martel-Sauvageau V. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index in the Quebec French Population (VHI-QF). J Voice [Internet]. 2020 Sep;34(5):811.e1-811.e6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.04.010 28. Miaśkiewicz B, Gos E, Dębińska M, Panasiewicz-Wosik A, Kapustka D, Nikiel K, et al. Polish Translation and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-30). Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2022 Ago 29;19(17):1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710738 29. Kaliavaradan S, Bhat PS, Rajagopal M, Venugopal V, Surendran P, Muruganidhi N, et al. Translation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index in Tamil language. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2022;74(suppl 3):4965-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02469-0 30. Feige K, Strauss A, Strauss G. Voice Handicap Index-18 as an Instrument for Assessing Subjective Voice Impairment Between Voice Pre- and Post-treatment. J Voice [Internet]. 2020 Sep;34(5):810.e1-810.e10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.04.005 31. Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, Zullo T, Murry T. Development and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index-10. Laryngoscope [Internet]. 2004 Sep;114(9):1549-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200409000-00009 32. Amir O, Tavor Y, Leibovitzh T, Ashkenazi O, Michael O, Primov‐Fever A, et al. Evaluating the validity of the Voice Handicap Index‐10 (VHI‐10) among Hebrew Speakers. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2006 Oct;135(4):603-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2006.06.1252 33. Farahat M. Validation and reliability of Arabic Voice Handicap Index-10. Saudi J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2012;14(1):11-8. Disponible en: https://journals.lww.com/sjoh/fulltext/2012/14010/validation_and_reliability_of_arabic_voice.3.aspx 34. Costa T, Oliveira G, Behlau M. Validation of the Voice Handicap Index: 10 (VHI-10) to the Brazilian Portuguese. CoDAS [Internet]. 2013 Oct;25(5):482-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-17822013000500013 35. Forti S, Amico M, Zambarbieri A, Ciabatta A, Assi C, Pignataro L, et al. Validation of the Italian Voice Handicap Index-10. J Voice [Internet]. 2014 Mar;28(2):263.e17-263.e22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.07.013 36. Godoy López A, Godall Castell P, Gassull Bustamante C. Implementación del VHI-10 en catalán y una nueva propuesta lingüística en castellano. Rev Logop Foniatría y Audiol [Internet]. 2017;37(2):56-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2016.06.002 37. Khalaf M, Matar N. Translation and transcultural adaptation of the VHI-10 questionnaire: the VHI-10lb. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2017;274(8):3139-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4585-9 38. Akhtar S, Dhanani R, Ahmad K. Translation and validation of Voice Handicap Index-10 in Urdu. A validation study from a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc [Internet]. 2018 Jun;68(6):904-7. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30325909 39. Ong FM, Husna Nik Hassan NFH, Azman M, Sani A, Mat Baki M. Validity and Reliability Study of Bahasa Malaysia Version of Voice Handicap Index-10. J Voice [Internet]. 2019 Jul;33(4):581.e17-581.e23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.01.015 40. Tafiadis D, Helidoni ME, Chronopoulos SK, Kosma EI, Ziavra N, Velegrakis GA. Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Greek Voice Handicap Index-10 (GVHI-10) With Additional Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis. J Voice [Internet]. 2020 Mar;34(2):304.e1-304.e8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.09.009 41. Azevedo SR, Santos M, Sousa F, Freitas S, Coutinho MB, Sousa CA e., et al. Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Voice Handicap Index-10. J Voice [Internet]. 2023 Ene;37(1):140.e7-140.e11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.10.019 42. Nissen LS, Schultz J, Galili J, Printz T, Mehlum CS, Grøntved ÅM, et al. Crosscultural Adaption and Validation of the Danish Voice Handicap Index-10. J Voice [Internet]. 2021 Jul;35(4):661.e7-661.e11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.12.014 43. Sanchez JG, Martinez D, Sanabria A. Adaptation and validation of the Latin-American Spanish version of the VHI-10 (LASVHI-10). Rev Logop Foniatría y Audiol [Internet]. 2022;42(3):118-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2020.12.001 44. Maksimovic J, Vukasinovic M, Vlajinac H, Jotic A, Djukic V, Marinkovic J, et al. Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index-10 into the Serbian Language. Folia Phoniatr Logop [Internet]. 2020;72(3):242-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000499927 45. Carrozzino D, Patierno C, Guidi J, Berrocal Montiel C, Cao J, Charlson ME, et al. Clinimetric Criteria for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(4):222–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000516599 46. Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2001 Feb;258(2):77-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004050000299 47. Román-Zubeldia J, Farías PG. Evaluación Instrumental de la Función Vocal: Actualización bibliográfica. Rev Fonoaudiológica [Internet]. 2021;68(1):96-111. Disponible en: https://fonoaudiologica.asalfa.org.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/31 48. Roy N, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Eadie T, Sivasankar MP, Mehta D, Paul D, et al. Evidence-based clinical voice assessment: A systematic review. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22(2):212-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0014) 49. Lira MT, Caballero E. Adaptación Transcultural De Instrumentos De Evaluación En Salud: Historia Y Reflexiones Del Por Qué, Cómo Y Cuándo. Rev Médica Clínica Las Condes [Internet]. 2020;31(1):85-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2019.08.003 50. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1980. 207 p. Disponible en: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/41003?locale-attribute=ru&show=full 51. Correa Forno SA, Azevedo RR, Côrtes Gama AC. Adaptación lingüística y cultural chilena del Voice Handicap Index (VHI) y del Voice Handicap Index 10 (VHI-10). Rev Chil Fonoaudiol [Internet]. 2023 Mar 8;22(1):1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-4692.2023.66978 52. Berchtold A. Test–retest: Agreement or reliability? Methodol Innov [Internet]. 2016 Jan 1;9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116672875 53. Cardemil F. Comparison analysis and applications of the Bland-Altman method: correlation or agreement? Medwave [Internet]. 2017 Ene 24;16(1):1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2016.01.6852
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2024-01-29
date_accessioned 2024-01-29T17:38:48Z
date_available 2024-01-29T17:38:48Z
url https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/265
url_doi https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.265
eissn 2665-2056
doi 10.46634/riics.265
citationstartpage 127
citationendpage 147
url2_str_mv https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/265/943
url4_str_mv https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/265/944
url3_str_mv https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/265/945
_version_ 1811200653152747520
spelling Adaptación y validación del Voice Handicap Index y su versión abreviada al español rioplatense de Argentina
Adaptación y validación del Voice Handicap Index y su versión abreviada al español rioplatense de Argentina
Objetivo. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo principal validar el Voice Handicap Index (VHI) y su versión abreviada (VHI-10) adaptados al español rioplatense de Argentina, con objetivos específicos centrados en evaluar su fiabilidad y validez. Metodología. La adaptación cultural incluyó técnicas de traducción directa, síntesis y retrotraducción, evaluación de la equivalencia semántica y aplicación a un grupo piloto. Para la validación se evaluó la fiabilidad de ambos índices adaptados mediante la consistencia interna (coeficiente alfa de Cronbach) y la estabilidad test-retest (prueba de Bland-Altman, CCI y r de Spearman). Además, se examinó la validez de criterio y de constructo. 213 sujetos participaron en la validación del índice adaptado de 30 ítems (123 disfónicos; 90 de control); 113, en la del índice abreviado (63 disfónicos; 50 de control). Resultados. Se constituyó el Índice de Desventaja Vocal (IDV) como la versión adaptada del VHI al español rioplatense de Argentina. Ambos índices demostraron excelente consistencia interna (IDV-30 α = 0,96; IDV-10 α = 0,92) y estabilidad y concordancia (IDV-30 CCI = 0,95; IDV-10 CCI = 0,96). Se halló alta correlación entre los puntajes de ambos índices y la autoevaluación de la severidad de la disfonía de los participantes (r = 0,85). Ambos índices demostraron capacidad de diferenciar entre individuos con disfonía y sujetos sanos (p< 0,001). El análisis factorial reveló tres factores para el IDV-30 y un factor para el IDV-10. Conclusiones. El IDV-30 e IDV-10 presentan grados adecuados de fiabilidad y validez. Ambos pueden ser incluidos en protocolos de valoración de la función vocal por profesionales de Argentina.  
Aim. This study aimed to validate the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and its abbreviated version (VHI-10) adapted into Rioplatense Spanish from Argentina, with specific goals centered on assessing their reliability and validity. Methods. Cultural adaptation involved direct translation, synthesis and back-translation techniques, followed by an assessment of semantic equivalence and application to a pilot group. For the validation process, the reliability of both adapted indices was assessed through measures of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) and test-retest stability (Bland-Altman test, ICC and Spearman's correlation coefficient). Additionally, we conducted analyses to asses criterion and construct validity. 213 subjects participated in the validation of the adapted 30-items index, (123 with dysphonia; 90 from control group); 113, in the abbreviated version (63 with dysphonia; 50 from control group). Results. The "Índice de Desventaja Vocal" (IDV) was established as the adapted version of the VHI into Rioplatense Spanish from Argentina. Both indeces exhibited excellent internal consistency (IDV-30 α = 0,96; IDV-10 α = 0,92) and satisfactory stability and agreement (IDV-30 CCI = 0,95; IDV-10 CCI = 0,96). Regarding validity, a strong correlation was observed between the scores of both indeces and the participant’s self-assessment of dysphonia degree (r = 0,85). Both indices effectively differentiated between individuals with dysphonia and healthy subjects (p< 0,001). Factor analysis revealed three factors for the IDV-30 and one factor for the IDV-10. Conclusion. The IDV-30 and IDV-10 demonstrate satisfactory levels of reliability and validity. Both indices can be incorporated into the assessment protocols for evaluating the vocal function by professionals in Argentina.
Román-Zubeldia, Juana
Farias, Patricia Guadalupe
Disfonía
voz
autoevaluación
índice
calidad de la voz
calidad de vida
rehabilitación vocal
estudio de validación
psicometría
comparación transcultural
Dysphonia
voice
self-testing
index
voice quality
quality of life
vocal rehabilitation
validation study
psychometrics
cross-cultural comparison
6
1
Artículo de revista
Journal article
2024-01-29T17:38:48Z
2024-01-29T17:38:48Z
2024-01-29
application/pdf
text/xml
text/html
Fundación Universitaria María Cano
Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud
2665-2056
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/265
10.46634/riics.265
https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.265
spa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2024
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
127
147
Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, Silbergleit A, Jacobson G, Benninger MS, et al. The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): Development and validation. Am J Speech-Language Pathol [Internet]. 1997 Aug;6(3):66-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0603.66 2. Nawka T, Wiesmann U, Gonnermann U. Validierung des Voice Handicap Index (VHI) in der deutschen fassung. HNO [Internet]. 2003 Nov;51(11):921-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-003-0909-8 3. Woisard V, Bodin S, Puech M. [The Voice Handicap Index: impact of the translation in French on the validation]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) [Internet]. 2004;125(5):307-12. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15856833 4. Amir O, Ashkenazi O, Leibovitzh T, Michael O, Tavor Y, Wolf M. Applying the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) to dysphonic and nondysphonic hebrew speakers. J Voice [Internet]. 2006 Jun;20(2):318-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.006 5. Hakkesteegt MM, Wieringa MH, Gerritsma EJ, Feenstra L. Reproducibility of the Dutch version of the Voice Handicap Index. Folia Phoniatr Logop [Internet]. 2006;58(2):132-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000089613 6. Lam PKY, Chan KM, Ho W, Kwong E, Yiu EM, Wei WI. Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Chinese Voice Handicap Index-10. Laryngoscope [Internet]. 2006 Jul;116(7):1192-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000224539.41003.93 7. Núñez-Batalla F, Corte-Santos P, Señaris-González B, Llorente-Pendás JL, Górriz-Gil C, Suárez-Nieto C. Adaptación y validación del índice de incapacidad vocal (VHI-30) y su versión abreviada (VHI-10) al español. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp [Internet]. 2007 Nov;58(9):386-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6519(07)74954-3 8. Kiliç MA, Okur E, Yildirim I, Oǧüt F, Denizoǧlu I, Kizilay A, et al. [Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Voice Handicap Index]. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg [Internet]. 2008;18(3):139-47. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18984994 9. Yun YS, Kim H, Son YI, Choi HS. Validation of the Korean Voice Handicap Index (K-VHI) and the clinical usefulness of Korean VHI-10. Commun Sci Disord [Internet]. 2008;13(2):216-41. Disponible en: https://www.e-csd.org/journal/view.php?number=357 10. Ohlsson AC, Dotevall H. Voice Handicap Index in Swedish. Logop Phoniatr Vocology [Internet]. 2009 Ene 13;34(2):60-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14015430902839185 11. Malki KH, Mesallam TA, Farahat M, Bukhari M, Murry T. Validation and cultural modification of Arabic Voice Handicap Index. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2010 Jun 9;267(11):1743-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1296-x 12. Helidoni ME, Murry T, Moschandreas J, Lionis C, Printza A, Velegrakis GA. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Greek. J Voice [Internet]. 2010;24(2):221-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.06.005 13. Schindler A, Ottaviani F, Mozzanica F, Bachmann C, Favero E, Schettino I, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Italian. J Voice [Internet]. 2010 Nov;24(6):708-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.05.006 14. Behlau M, Alves Dos Santos LDM, Oliveira G. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Brazilian Portuguese. J Voice [Internet]. 2011 May;25(3):354-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.09.007 15. Xu W, Han D, Li H, Hu R, Zhang L. Application of the mandarin chinese version of the Voice Handicap Index. J Voice [Internet]. 2010;24(6):702-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.05.007 16. Datta R, Sethi A, Singh S, Nilakantan A, Venkatesh MD. Translation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index in Hindi. J Laryngol Voice [Internet]. 2011;1(1):12-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-9748.76131 17. Taguchi A, Mise K, Nishikubo K, Hyodo M, Shiromoto O. Japanese version of Voice Handicap Index for subjective evaluation of voice disorder. J Voice [Internet]. 2012 Sep;26(5):668.e15-668.e19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.11.005 18. Menon U, Sheejamol VS, Cherian MP. Validation of Malayalam Version of the Voice Handicap Index. Int J Phonosurgery Laryngol [Internet]. 2012;2(1):1-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10023-1025 19. Karlsen T, Grieg ARH, Heimdal JH, Aarstad HJ. Cross-cultural adaption and translation of the Voice Handicap Index into Norwegian. Folia Phoniatr Logop [Internet]. 2013;64(5):234-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000343080 20. Bonetti A, Bonetti L. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Croatian. J Voice [Internet]. 2013;27(1):130.e7-130.e14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.07.006 21. Moradi N, Pourshahbaz A, Soltani M, Javadipour S, Hashemi H, Soltaninejad N. Cross-cultural equivalence and evaluation of psychometric properties of Voice Handicap Index into Persian. J Voice [Internet]. 2013 Mar;27(2):258.e15-258.e22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.09.006 22. Trinite B, Sokolovs J. Adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index in Latvian. J Voice [Internet]. 2014 Jul;28(4):452-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.01.008 23. Jaruchinda P, Suwanwarangkool T. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Thai. J Med Assoc Thai [Internet]. 2015;98(12):1199-208. Disponible en: http://www.jmatonline.com/index.php/jmat/article/view/6714 24. Sotirović J, Grgurević A, Mumović G, Grgurević U, Pavićević L, Perić A, et al. Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-30 into Serbian. J Voice [Internet]. 2016 Nov;30(6):758.e1-758.e6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.09.002 25. Sorensen JR, Printz T, Mehlum CS, Heidemann CH, Groentved AM, Godballe C. Cross-cultural Adaption and Validation of the Danish Voice Handicap Index. J Voice [Internet]. 2019;33(4):441-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.01.010 26. Frajkova Z, Krizekova A, Missikova V, Tedla M. Translation, Cross-Cultural Validation of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-30) in Slovak Language. J Voice [Internet]. 2022;36(1):145e1-145e6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.04.003 27. Bourque JM, Defoy L, Batcho CS, Tremblay P, Gagnon S, Martel-Sauvageau V. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index in the Quebec French Population (VHI-QF). J Voice [Internet]. 2020 Sep;34(5):811.e1-811.e6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.04.010 28. Miaśkiewicz B, Gos E, Dębińska M, Panasiewicz-Wosik A, Kapustka D, Nikiel K, et al. Polish Translation and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-30). Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2022 Ago 29;19(17):1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710738 29. Kaliavaradan S, Bhat PS, Rajagopal M, Venugopal V, Surendran P, Muruganidhi N, et al. Translation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index in Tamil language. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2022;74(suppl 3):4965-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02469-0 30. Feige K, Strauss A, Strauss G. Voice Handicap Index-18 as an Instrument for Assessing Subjective Voice Impairment Between Voice Pre- and Post-treatment. J Voice [Internet]. 2020 Sep;34(5):810.e1-810.e10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.04.005 31. Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, Zullo T, Murry T. Development and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index-10. Laryngoscope [Internet]. 2004 Sep;114(9):1549-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200409000-00009 32. Amir O, Tavor Y, Leibovitzh T, Ashkenazi O, Michael O, Primov‐Fever A, et al. Evaluating the validity of the Voice Handicap Index‐10 (VHI‐10) among Hebrew Speakers. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2006 Oct;135(4):603-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2006.06.1252 33. Farahat M. Validation and reliability of Arabic Voice Handicap Index-10. Saudi J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2012;14(1):11-8. Disponible en: https://journals.lww.com/sjoh/fulltext/2012/14010/validation_and_reliability_of_arabic_voice.3.aspx 34. Costa T, Oliveira G, Behlau M. Validation of the Voice Handicap Index: 10 (VHI-10) to the Brazilian Portuguese. CoDAS [Internet]. 2013 Oct;25(5):482-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-17822013000500013 35. Forti S, Amico M, Zambarbieri A, Ciabatta A, Assi C, Pignataro L, et al. Validation of the Italian Voice Handicap Index-10. J Voice [Internet]. 2014 Mar;28(2):263.e17-263.e22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.07.013 36. Godoy López A, Godall Castell P, Gassull Bustamante C. Implementación del VHI-10 en catalán y una nueva propuesta lingüística en castellano. Rev Logop Foniatría y Audiol [Internet]. 2017;37(2):56-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2016.06.002 37. Khalaf M, Matar N. Translation and transcultural adaptation of the VHI-10 questionnaire: the VHI-10lb. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2017;274(8):3139-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4585-9 38. Akhtar S, Dhanani R, Ahmad K. Translation and validation of Voice Handicap Index-10 in Urdu. A validation study from a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc [Internet]. 2018 Jun;68(6):904-7. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30325909 39. Ong FM, Husna Nik Hassan NFH, Azman M, Sani A, Mat Baki M. Validity and Reliability Study of Bahasa Malaysia Version of Voice Handicap Index-10. J Voice [Internet]. 2019 Jul;33(4):581.e17-581.e23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.01.015 40. Tafiadis D, Helidoni ME, Chronopoulos SK, Kosma EI, Ziavra N, Velegrakis GA. Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Greek Voice Handicap Index-10 (GVHI-10) With Additional Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis. J Voice [Internet]. 2020 Mar;34(2):304.e1-304.e8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.09.009 41. Azevedo SR, Santos M, Sousa F, Freitas S, Coutinho MB, Sousa CA e., et al. Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Voice Handicap Index-10. J Voice [Internet]. 2023 Ene;37(1):140.e7-140.e11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.10.019 42. Nissen LS, Schultz J, Galili J, Printz T, Mehlum CS, Grøntved ÅM, et al. Crosscultural Adaption and Validation of the Danish Voice Handicap Index-10. J Voice [Internet]. 2021 Jul;35(4):661.e7-661.e11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.12.014 43. Sanchez JG, Martinez D, Sanabria A. Adaptation and validation of the Latin-American Spanish version of the VHI-10 (LASVHI-10). Rev Logop Foniatría y Audiol [Internet]. 2022;42(3):118-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2020.12.001 44. Maksimovic J, Vukasinovic M, Vlajinac H, Jotic A, Djukic V, Marinkovic J, et al. Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index-10 into the Serbian Language. Folia Phoniatr Logop [Internet]. 2020;72(3):242-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000499927 45. Carrozzino D, Patierno C, Guidi J, Berrocal Montiel C, Cao J, Charlson ME, et al. Clinimetric Criteria for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(4):222–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000516599 46. Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2001 Feb;258(2):77-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004050000299 47. Román-Zubeldia J, Farías PG. Evaluación Instrumental de la Función Vocal: Actualización bibliográfica. Rev Fonoaudiológica [Internet]. 2021;68(1):96-111. Disponible en: https://fonoaudiologica.asalfa.org.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/31 48. Roy N, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Eadie T, Sivasankar MP, Mehta D, Paul D, et al. Evidence-based clinical voice assessment: A systematic review. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22(2):212-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0014) 49. Lira MT, Caballero E. Adaptación Transcultural De Instrumentos De Evaluación En Salud: Historia Y Reflexiones Del Por Qué, Cómo Y Cuándo. Rev Médica Clínica Las Condes [Internet]. 2020;31(1):85-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2019.08.003 50. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1980. 207 p. Disponible en: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/41003?locale-attribute=ru&show=full 51. Correa Forno SA, Azevedo RR, Côrtes Gama AC. Adaptación lingüística y cultural chilena del Voice Handicap Index (VHI) y del Voice Handicap Index 10 (VHI-10). Rev Chil Fonoaudiol [Internet]. 2023 Mar 8;22(1):1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-4692.2023.66978 52. Berchtold A. Test–retest: Agreement or reliability? Methodol Innov [Internet]. 2016 Jan 1;9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116672875 53. Cardemil F. Comparison analysis and applications of the Bland-Altman method: correlation or agreement? Medwave [Internet]. 2017 Ene 24;16(1):1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2016.01.6852
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/265/943
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/265/944
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/265/945
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
Publication

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares