Titulo:
Riesgo de disfonía en profesionales del derecho: propuesta de un protocolo de detección
.
Sumario:
Introducción. Debido a las exigencias comunicativas inherentes a la profesión, el profesional del derecho se beneficia del seguimiento logopédico para el correcto uso de la voz y para evitar la aparición de trastornos vocales. El desarrollo de instrumentos específicos contribuirá con datos más relevantes para guiar este seguimiento. Objetivo. Verificar la aplicabilidad del Protocolo General de Detección de Riesgo de Disfonía (DRSP-G) y el Protocolo de Detección de Riesgo Específico para Profesionales del Derecho (DRSP-LP) y correlacionar las puntuaciones de ambos con varias variables de interés. Metodología. Participaron 50 profesionales del derecho. Todos completaron el DRSP-G y DRSP-LP y grabaron sus voces para detectar la presencia de al... Ver más
Guardado en:
2665-2056
5
2023-11-30
93
111
Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2023
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
metarevistapublica_fumc_revistadeinvestigacioneinnovacionencienciasdelasalud_67_article_236 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
FUNDACION UNIVERSITARIA MARIA CANO |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/FUNDACIONUNIVERSITARIAMARIACANO/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud |
| title |
Riesgo de disfonía en profesionales del derecho: propuesta de un protocolo de detección |
| spellingShingle |
Riesgo de disfonía en profesionales del derecho: propuesta de un protocolo de detección Martini Ramalho Gullino, Maria Beatriz Simões-Zenari, Marcia de Albuquerque Rodrigues, Danilo Carvalho Said, Giselle Nemr, Katia trastornos de la voz calidad de la voz logopedia entrenamiento de la voz habla comunicación abogados salud laboral vigilancia de la salud del trabajador política de salud ocupacional Voice voice disorders voice quality speech therapy voice training speech communication lawyers occupational health surveillance of the workers health occupational health policy |
| title_short |
Riesgo de disfonía en profesionales del derecho: propuesta de un protocolo de detección |
| title_full |
Riesgo de disfonía en profesionales del derecho: propuesta de un protocolo de detección |
| title_fullStr |
Riesgo de disfonía en profesionales del derecho: propuesta de un protocolo de detección |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Riesgo de disfonía en profesionales del derecho: propuesta de un protocolo de detección |
| title_sort |
riesgo de disfonía en profesionales del derecho: propuesta de un protocolo de detección |
| description |
Introducción. Debido a las exigencias comunicativas inherentes a la profesión, el profesional del derecho se beneficia del seguimiento logopédico para el correcto uso de la voz y para evitar la aparición de trastornos vocales. El desarrollo de instrumentos específicos contribuirá con datos más relevantes para guiar este seguimiento.
Objetivo. Verificar la aplicabilidad del Protocolo General de Detección de Riesgo de Disfonía (DRSP-G) y el Protocolo de Detección de Riesgo Específico para Profesionales del Derecho (DRSP-LP) y correlacionar las puntuaciones de ambos con varias variables de interés.
Metodología. Participaron 50 profesionales del derecho. Todos completaron el DRSP-G y DRSP-LP y grabaron sus voces para detectar la presencia de alteraciones en la calidad de la voz.
Resultados. La mayoría presentó un alto riesgo de disfonía, que fue mayor en los hombres. Se observó alteración en la calidad de la voz en el 34% de los participantes. Los ítems con puntajes más altos en el DRSP-G fueron hablar mucho (76%), ingesta diaria excesiva de café (70%), contacto con fumadores (60%) e hidratación y sueño insuficientes (48%); y en el DRSP-LP, consumo de alcohol (68%) y exposición al aire acondicionado (64%). No hubo correlación entre las puntuaciones de riesgo y el grado de disfonía, ni con la edad o la antigüedad profesional. La puntuación DRSP-G se correlacionó con los signos y síntomas vocales y la autopercepción vocal.
Conclusiones. La aplicación conjunta del DRSP-G y el DRSP-LP permitió un análisis cuantitativo y cualitativo de los factores de riesgo de disfonía en profesionales del derecho.
|
| description_eng |
Introduction. Due to the communicative requirements inherent to the profession, the legal professional benefits from speech therapy monitoring for the proper use of the voice and to avoid the occurrence of vocal disorders. The development of specific instruments will contribute with more relevant data to guide this monitoring.
Objective. To verify the applicability of the General Dysphonia Risk Screening Protocol (DRSP-G) and the Specific Dysphonia Risk Screening Protocol for Legal Professionals (DRSP-LP) and to correlate the average scores of both with vocal deviation, sex, age, professional performance time, vocal signs and symptoms, and vocal self-assessment.
Methods. Fifty legal professionals participated. All participants completed the DRSP-G and DRSP-LP and recorded their voices for detection of the presence of altered vocal quality.
Results. Most participants presented a high risk of dysphonia, which was higher in men. Altered vocal quality was observed in 34% of the participants. The items with the highest scores in the DRSP-G were talking a lot (76%), excessive daily coffee intake (70%), contact with smokers (60%), and insufficient hydration and sleep (48%); in the DRSP-LP, alcohol consumption (68%) and exposure to air conditioning (64%). There was no correlation between risk scores and the degree of dysphonia, or with age or length of professional experience. The DRSP-G score correlated with vocal signs and symptoms and vocal self-perception.
Conclusions. The joint application of the DRSP-G and the DRSP-LP enabled a quantitative and qualitative analysis of risk factors for dysphonia in legal professionals.
|
| author |
Martini Ramalho Gullino, Maria Beatriz Simões-Zenari, Marcia de Albuquerque Rodrigues, Danilo Carvalho Said, Giselle Nemr, Katia |
| author_facet |
Martini Ramalho Gullino, Maria Beatriz Simões-Zenari, Marcia de Albuquerque Rodrigues, Danilo Carvalho Said, Giselle Nemr, Katia |
| topicspa_str_mv |
trastornos de la voz calidad de la voz logopedia entrenamiento de la voz habla comunicación abogados salud laboral vigilancia de la salud del trabajador política de salud ocupacional |
| topic |
trastornos de la voz calidad de la voz logopedia entrenamiento de la voz habla comunicación abogados salud laboral vigilancia de la salud del trabajador política de salud ocupacional Voice voice disorders voice quality speech therapy voice training speech communication lawyers occupational health surveillance of the workers health occupational health policy |
| topic_facet |
trastornos de la voz calidad de la voz logopedia entrenamiento de la voz habla comunicación abogados salud laboral vigilancia de la salud del trabajador política de salud ocupacional Voice voice disorders voice quality speech therapy voice training speech communication lawyers occupational health surveillance of the workers health occupational health policy |
| citationvolume |
5 |
| citationissue |
2 |
| publisher |
Fundación Universitaria María Cano |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud |
| source |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/236 |
| language |
eng |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2023 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references_eng |
Dantas NP, Lima Júnior OP. A relevância da abordagem de práticas de comunicação, oratória e argumentação nas faculdades de Direito. Research, Society and Development 2022;11(16):e508111638462. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i16.38462 2. Sales NJ, Castaneda DFN, Barreto IDC, Paoliello M, Campanha SMA. Communication self-assessment by public prosecutors in a north-eastern Brazilian state. CoDAS. 2016;28(6):678-686. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015238 3. Chen D, Halberstam Y, Yu ACL. Perceived Masculinity Predicts U.S. Supreme Court Outcomes. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0164324. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164324 4. Lei nº 8.906, de 4 de julho de 1994. Dispõe sobre o Estatuto da Advocacia e a Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil (OAB). Diário Oficial da União de 05/07/1994 (Jul 4, 1994). Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L8906.htm 5. Phyland D, Miles A. Occupational voice is a work in progress: active risk management, habilitation and rehabilitation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;27(6):439-447. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000584 6. Mori MC, Francis DO, Song PC. Identifying occupations at risk for laryngeal disorders requiring specialty voice care. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 2017;157(4),670–675. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599817726528 7. Marçal CCB, Peres MA. Self-reported voice problems among teachers: prevalence and associated factors. Rev. Saúde Pública. 2011;45(3):503-11. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102011005000025 8. Souza LB, Gurlekian JA, Sabino APM, Pernambuco LA, Marquiony MS. Avaliação do risco vocal em professores do ensino fundamental. Rev. Ciênc. Méd. Biol. 2014;13(1):18-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.9771/cmbio.v13i1.9009 9. Vieira ABC, Rocha MOC, Gama ACC, Gonçalves DU. Fatores causais e profilaxia da disfonia na prática docente. Cadernos de Educação. 2007; (28):255-70. Available from: https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/caduc/article/view/1803 10. Behlau M, Pontes P, Moreti F. Higiene vocal: cuidando da voz. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 2017. 120 p. 11. Ruiz DMCF, Tsuji SACN, Faccio CB, Romanini JS, Ghedini SG. Ocorrência de queixas vocais em advogados, juízes e promotores. Revista Pró-Fono.1997:9(1):27-30. Available from: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-201981 12. Cantor-Cutiva LC. Association between occupational voice use and occurrence of voice disorders: a meta-analysis. Areté. 2018; 18(2):1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.33881/1657-2513.art.18201 13. Nemr K, Simões-Zenari M, Duarte JMT, Lobrigate KE, Bagatini FA. Dysphonia risk screening protocol. Clinics. 2016;71(3):114-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(03)01 14. Nemr K, Cota AR, Tsuji D, Simões-Zenari M. Voice deviation, dysphonia risk screening and quality of life in individuals with various laryngeal diagnoses. Clinics. 2018;73:e174. doi: https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2018/e174 15. Rodrigues DA, Simões-Zenari M, Cota AR, Nemr K. Voice and communication in news anchors: what is the impact of the passage of time? J Voice. 2021;S0892-1997(21)00320-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.09.022 16. Silva BG, Chammas TV, Simões-Zenari M, Moreira RR, Samelli AG, Nemr K. Analysis of possible factors of vocal interference during the teaching activity. Rev. Saude Publica. 2017;51:124. doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000092 17. Duarte JMT, Souza GVS, Simões-Zenari M, Nemr K. The actor's voice: vocal performance assessment by different professionals. J Voice. 2022;36(3):440.e1-440.e9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.06.019 18. Paulino LC, Simões-Zenari M, Nemr K. Protocolo de Rastreio do Risco de Disfonia para Atores de Teatro Musical: resultados preliminares. CoDAS. 2021;33(1):e20190112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202019112 19. Behlau M, Rocha B, Englert M, Madazio G. Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese CAPE-V instrument-Br CAPE-V for auditory-perceptual analysis. J Voice. 2022;36(4):586.e15-586.e20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.07.007 20. Yamasaki R, Madazio G, Leão SH, Padovani M, Azevedo R, Behlau M. Auditory-perceptual evaluation of normal and dysphonic voices using the Voice Deviation Scale. J Voice. 2017;31(1):67-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.01.004 21. Hunter EJ, Tanner K, Smith ME. Gender differences affecting vocal health of women in vocally demanding careers. Logopedics, Phoniatrics, Vocology 2011;36(3):128-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2011.587447 22. Cielo CA, Finger LS, Rosa JC, Brancalioni AR. Lesões organofuncionais do tipo nódulos, pólipos e edema de Reinke. Rev. CEFAC. 2011;13(4):735-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462011005000018 23. Lyberg-Åhlander V, Rydell R, Fredlund P, Magnusson C, Wilén S. Prevalence of voice disorders in the general population, based on the Stockholm Public Health Cohort. J Voice. 2019;33(6):900-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.007 24. Fillis MMA, Andrade SM, González AD, Melanda FN, Mesas AE. Frequência de problemas vocais autorreferidos e fatores ocupacionais associados em professores da educação básica de Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2016;32(1):e00026015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00026015 25. Silva BGM, Simões-Zenari M, Nemr K. What is the risk of dysphonia in workers who use their voice in a university environment? Audiol., Commun. Res. 2021;26:e2429. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2020-2429 26. Nemr K, Simões-Zenari M, Cologis VCA, Martins GA, Saito IT, Gonçalves RS. COVID-19 and remote learning: predictive factors of perceived improvement or worsening of the voice in brazilian teachers. J Voice. 2021;S0892-1997(21)00290-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.08.010 27. LIF Voz (org.). Bem-estar vocal: guia prático [livro eletrônico]. São Paulo, SP: Sintropia Traduções; 2022. 45 p. Available from: https://www.instagram.com/lifvozfonousp/ 28. Puhl AE, Bittencourt MFP, Ferreira LP, Andrada e Silva MA. Tabagismo e ingestão alcoólica: prevalência em professores, cantores e teleoperadores e atores. Distúrb. Comun. 2017;29(4):683-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2017v29i4p683-691 29. Ayoub MR, Larrouy-Maestri P, Morsomme D. The effect of smoking on the fundamental frequency of the speaking voice. J Voice. 2019;33(5):802.e11-802-e16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.04.001 30. Yildiz MG,Bilal N, Kara I, Sagiroglu S, Orhan I, Doganer A. Voice Disorders in Lower Primary School Teachers: An Observational Study. J Voice. 2023;37(1):141.e1-141.e8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.001 31. Behlau M, Zambon F, Guerrieri AC, Roy N. Epidemiology of voice disorders in teachers and nonteachers in Brazil: prevalence and adverse effects. J Voice. 2012;26(5):665.e9-665.e18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.09.010 32. Gomes ABP, Simões-Zenari M, Nemr K. Voz do idoso: o avanço da idade gera diferentes impactos? CoDAS 2021;33(6):e20200126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202020126 33. Van Lierde KM, Dijckmans J, Scheffel L, Behlau M. Type and severity of pain during phonation in professional voice users and nonvocal professionals. J Voice. 2012;26(5):671.e19-671.e23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.11.008 34. Penteado RZ, Silva NB, Calçada MLM, Montebello MIL. Voz, estresse, trabalho e qualidade de vida de técnicos e preparadores físicos de futebol. Distúrb Comun. 2015;27(4):778-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20152015021 35. Lopes LW, Vilela EG. Self-assessment and readiness for change in dysphonic patients. CoDAS. 2016;28(3):295-301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015111 |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2023-11-30 |
| date_accessioned |
2023-11-30T16:21:14Z |
| date_available |
2023-11-30T16:21:14Z |
| url |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/236 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.236 |
| eissn |
2665-2056 |
| doi |
10.46634/riics.236 |
| citationstartpage |
93 |
| citationendpage |
111 |
| url3_str_mv |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/236/882 |
| url4_str_mv |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/236/883 |
| url2_str_mv |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/236/884 |
| _version_ |
1811200651679498240 |
| spelling |
Riesgo de disfonía en profesionales del derecho: propuesta de un protocolo de detección Riesgo de disfonía en profesionales del derecho: propuesta de un protocolo de detección Introducción. Debido a las exigencias comunicativas inherentes a la profesión, el profesional del derecho se beneficia del seguimiento logopédico para el correcto uso de la voz y para evitar la aparición de trastornos vocales. El desarrollo de instrumentos específicos contribuirá con datos más relevantes para guiar este seguimiento. Objetivo. Verificar la aplicabilidad del Protocolo General de Detección de Riesgo de Disfonía (DRSP-G) y el Protocolo de Detección de Riesgo Específico para Profesionales del Derecho (DRSP-LP) y correlacionar las puntuaciones de ambos con varias variables de interés. Metodología. Participaron 50 profesionales del derecho. Todos completaron el DRSP-G y DRSP-LP y grabaron sus voces para detectar la presencia de alteraciones en la calidad de la voz. Resultados. La mayoría presentó un alto riesgo de disfonía, que fue mayor en los hombres. Se observó alteración en la calidad de la voz en el 34% de los participantes. Los ítems con puntajes más altos en el DRSP-G fueron hablar mucho (76%), ingesta diaria excesiva de café (70%), contacto con fumadores (60%) e hidratación y sueño insuficientes (48%); y en el DRSP-LP, consumo de alcohol (68%) y exposición al aire acondicionado (64%). No hubo correlación entre las puntuaciones de riesgo y el grado de disfonía, ni con la edad o la antigüedad profesional. La puntuación DRSP-G se correlacionó con los signos y síntomas vocales y la autopercepción vocal. Conclusiones. La aplicación conjunta del DRSP-G y el DRSP-LP permitió un análisis cuantitativo y cualitativo de los factores de riesgo de disfonía en profesionales del derecho. Introduction. Due to the communicative requirements inherent to the profession, the legal professional benefits from speech therapy monitoring for the proper use of the voice and to avoid the occurrence of vocal disorders. The development of specific instruments will contribute with more relevant data to guide this monitoring. Objective. To verify the applicability of the General Dysphonia Risk Screening Protocol (DRSP-G) and the Specific Dysphonia Risk Screening Protocol for Legal Professionals (DRSP-LP) and to correlate the average scores of both with vocal deviation, sex, age, professional performance time, vocal signs and symptoms, and vocal self-assessment. Methods. Fifty legal professionals participated. All participants completed the DRSP-G and DRSP-LP and recorded their voices for detection of the presence of altered vocal quality. Results. Most participants presented a high risk of dysphonia, which was higher in men. Altered vocal quality was observed in 34% of the participants. The items with the highest scores in the DRSP-G were talking a lot (76%), excessive daily coffee intake (70%), contact with smokers (60%), and insufficient hydration and sleep (48%); in the DRSP-LP, alcohol consumption (68%) and exposure to air conditioning (64%). There was no correlation between risk scores and the degree of dysphonia, or with age or length of professional experience. The DRSP-G score correlated with vocal signs and symptoms and vocal self-perception. Conclusions. The joint application of the DRSP-G and the DRSP-LP enabled a quantitative and qualitative analysis of risk factors for dysphonia in legal professionals. Martini Ramalho Gullino, Maria Beatriz Simões-Zenari, Marcia de Albuquerque Rodrigues, Danilo Carvalho Said, Giselle Nemr, Katia Voz trastornos de la voz calidad de la voz logopedia entrenamiento de la voz habla comunicación abogados salud laboral vigilancia de la salud del trabajador política de salud ocupacional Voice voice disorders voice quality speech therapy voice training speech communication lawyers occupational health surveillance of the workers health occupational health policy 5 2 Artículo de revista Journal article 2023-11-30T16:21:14Z 2023-11-30T16:21:14Z 2023-11-30 text/html text/xml application/pdf Fundación Universitaria María Cano Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud 2665-2056 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/236 10.46634/riics.236 https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.236 eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2023 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. 93 111 Dantas NP, Lima Júnior OP. A relevância da abordagem de práticas de comunicação, oratória e argumentação nas faculdades de Direito. Research, Society and Development 2022;11(16):e508111638462. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i16.38462 2. Sales NJ, Castaneda DFN, Barreto IDC, Paoliello M, Campanha SMA. Communication self-assessment by public prosecutors in a north-eastern Brazilian state. CoDAS. 2016;28(6):678-686. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015238 3. Chen D, Halberstam Y, Yu ACL. Perceived Masculinity Predicts U.S. Supreme Court Outcomes. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0164324. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164324 4. Lei nº 8.906, de 4 de julho de 1994. Dispõe sobre o Estatuto da Advocacia e a Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil (OAB). Diário Oficial da União de 05/07/1994 (Jul 4, 1994). Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L8906.htm 5. Phyland D, Miles A. Occupational voice is a work in progress: active risk management, habilitation and rehabilitation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;27(6):439-447. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000584 6. Mori MC, Francis DO, Song PC. Identifying occupations at risk for laryngeal disorders requiring specialty voice care. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 2017;157(4),670–675. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599817726528 7. Marçal CCB, Peres MA. Self-reported voice problems among teachers: prevalence and associated factors. Rev. Saúde Pública. 2011;45(3):503-11. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102011005000025 8. Souza LB, Gurlekian JA, Sabino APM, Pernambuco LA, Marquiony MS. Avaliação do risco vocal em professores do ensino fundamental. Rev. Ciênc. Méd. Biol. 2014;13(1):18-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.9771/cmbio.v13i1.9009 9. Vieira ABC, Rocha MOC, Gama ACC, Gonçalves DU. Fatores causais e profilaxia da disfonia na prática docente. Cadernos de Educação. 2007; (28):255-70. Available from: https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/caduc/article/view/1803 10. Behlau M, Pontes P, Moreti F. Higiene vocal: cuidando da voz. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 2017. 120 p. 11. Ruiz DMCF, Tsuji SACN, Faccio CB, Romanini JS, Ghedini SG. Ocorrência de queixas vocais em advogados, juízes e promotores. Revista Pró-Fono.1997:9(1):27-30. Available from: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-201981 12. Cantor-Cutiva LC. Association between occupational voice use and occurrence of voice disorders: a meta-analysis. Areté. 2018; 18(2):1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.33881/1657-2513.art.18201 13. Nemr K, Simões-Zenari M, Duarte JMT, Lobrigate KE, Bagatini FA. Dysphonia risk screening protocol. Clinics. 2016;71(3):114-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(03)01 14. Nemr K, Cota AR, Tsuji D, Simões-Zenari M. Voice deviation, dysphonia risk screening and quality of life in individuals with various laryngeal diagnoses. Clinics. 2018;73:e174. doi: https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2018/e174 15. Rodrigues DA, Simões-Zenari M, Cota AR, Nemr K. Voice and communication in news anchors: what is the impact of the passage of time? J Voice. 2021;S0892-1997(21)00320-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.09.022 16. Silva BG, Chammas TV, Simões-Zenari M, Moreira RR, Samelli AG, Nemr K. Analysis of possible factors of vocal interference during the teaching activity. Rev. Saude Publica. 2017;51:124. doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000092 17. Duarte JMT, Souza GVS, Simões-Zenari M, Nemr K. The actor's voice: vocal performance assessment by different professionals. J Voice. 2022;36(3):440.e1-440.e9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.06.019 18. Paulino LC, Simões-Zenari M, Nemr K. Protocolo de Rastreio do Risco de Disfonia para Atores de Teatro Musical: resultados preliminares. CoDAS. 2021;33(1):e20190112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202019112 19. Behlau M, Rocha B, Englert M, Madazio G. Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese CAPE-V instrument-Br CAPE-V for auditory-perceptual analysis. J Voice. 2022;36(4):586.e15-586.e20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.07.007 20. Yamasaki R, Madazio G, Leão SH, Padovani M, Azevedo R, Behlau M. Auditory-perceptual evaluation of normal and dysphonic voices using the Voice Deviation Scale. J Voice. 2017;31(1):67-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.01.004 21. Hunter EJ, Tanner K, Smith ME. Gender differences affecting vocal health of women in vocally demanding careers. Logopedics, Phoniatrics, Vocology 2011;36(3):128-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2011.587447 22. Cielo CA, Finger LS, Rosa JC, Brancalioni AR. Lesões organofuncionais do tipo nódulos, pólipos e edema de Reinke. Rev. CEFAC. 2011;13(4):735-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462011005000018 23. Lyberg-Åhlander V, Rydell R, Fredlund P, Magnusson C, Wilén S. Prevalence of voice disorders in the general population, based on the Stockholm Public Health Cohort. J Voice. 2019;33(6):900-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.007 24. Fillis MMA, Andrade SM, González AD, Melanda FN, Mesas AE. Frequência de problemas vocais autorreferidos e fatores ocupacionais associados em professores da educação básica de Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2016;32(1):e00026015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00026015 25. Silva BGM, Simões-Zenari M, Nemr K. What is the risk of dysphonia in workers who use their voice in a university environment? Audiol., Commun. Res. 2021;26:e2429. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2020-2429 26. Nemr K, Simões-Zenari M, Cologis VCA, Martins GA, Saito IT, Gonçalves RS. COVID-19 and remote learning: predictive factors of perceived improvement or worsening of the voice in brazilian teachers. J Voice. 2021;S0892-1997(21)00290-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.08.010 27. LIF Voz (org.). Bem-estar vocal: guia prático [livro eletrônico]. São Paulo, SP: Sintropia Traduções; 2022. 45 p. Available from: https://www.instagram.com/lifvozfonousp/ 28. Puhl AE, Bittencourt MFP, Ferreira LP, Andrada e Silva MA. Tabagismo e ingestão alcoólica: prevalência em professores, cantores e teleoperadores e atores. Distúrb. Comun. 2017;29(4):683-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2017v29i4p683-691 29. Ayoub MR, Larrouy-Maestri P, Morsomme D. The effect of smoking on the fundamental frequency of the speaking voice. J Voice. 2019;33(5):802.e11-802-e16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.04.001 30. Yildiz MG,Bilal N, Kara I, Sagiroglu S, Orhan I, Doganer A. Voice Disorders in Lower Primary School Teachers: An Observational Study. J Voice. 2023;37(1):141.e1-141.e8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.001 31. Behlau M, Zambon F, Guerrieri AC, Roy N. Epidemiology of voice disorders in teachers and nonteachers in Brazil: prevalence and adverse effects. J Voice. 2012;26(5):665.e9-665.e18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.09.010 32. Gomes ABP, Simões-Zenari M, Nemr K. Voz do idoso: o avanço da idade gera diferentes impactos? CoDAS 2021;33(6):e20200126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202020126 33. Van Lierde KM, Dijckmans J, Scheffel L, Behlau M. Type and severity of pain during phonation in professional voice users and nonvocal professionals. J Voice. 2012;26(5):671.e19-671.e23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.11.008 34. Penteado RZ, Silva NB, Calçada MLM, Montebello MIL. Voz, estresse, trabalho e qualidade de vida de técnicos e preparadores físicos de futebol. Distúrb Comun. 2015;27(4):778-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20152015021 35. Lopes LW, Vilela EG. Self-assessment and readiness for change in dysphonic patients. CoDAS. 2016;28(3):295-301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015111 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/236/882 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/236/883 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/236/884 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication |