¿Cómo construir objetivos operacionales medibles? Una taxonomía de criterios de logro para el monitoreo de la intervención vocal

Crisosto-Alarcón, Jaime

doi:10.46634/riics.230

Titulo:

¿Cómo construir objetivos operacionales medibles? Una taxonomía de criterios de logro para el monitoreo de la intervención vocal
.

Sumario:

Introducción. La complejidad del fenómeno vocal dificulta que el/la terapeuta monitoree de manera rápida y eficaz los logros obtenidos por el/la usuario/a mediante la intervención fonoaudiológica. La evaluación del avance terapéutico depende de la habilidad del/la terapeuta para emplear criterios de medición válidos, confiables y significativos. Objetivo. Desarrollar un modelo teórico de criterios de logro para su consideración en la formulación de los objetivos operacionales en las planificaciones terapéuticas que emplean los profesionales fonoaudiólogos en la atención de usuarios/as que presentan queja vocal. Metodología. Investigación cualitativa, de tipo conceptual y modélica, en la que se lleva a cabo una revisión crítica de la literat... Ver más

Guardado en:

Revista:

Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud

EISSN:

2665-2056

Autores:

Crisosto-Alarcón, Jaime

Editor:

FUNDACION UNIVERSITARIA MARIA CANO

DOI:

10.46634/riics.230

Volumen:

Año de publicación:

2023-11-30

Pagina inicial:

205

Pagina final:

231

Pais:

Colombia

Palabras claves:

Planificación terapéutica

Licencia:

Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2023

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id	metarevistapublica_fumc_revistadeinvestigacioneinnovacionencienciasdelasalud_67_article_230
record_format	ojs
institution	FUNDACION UNIVERSITARIA MARIA CANO
thumbnail	https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/FUNDACIONUNIVERSITARIAMARIACANO/logo.png
country_str	Colombia
collection	Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud
title	¿Cómo construir objetivos operacionales medibles? Una taxonomía de criterios de logro para el monitoreo de la intervención vocal
spellingShingle	¿Cómo construir objetivos operacionales medibles? Una taxonomía de criterios de logro para el monitoreo de la intervención vocal Crisosto-Alarcón, Jaime Planificación terapéutica objetivos logro disfonía fonoaudiología entrenamiento vocal rehabilitación Treatment planning goals achievement voice voice disorders speech therapy voice training rehabilitation
title_short	¿Cómo construir objetivos operacionales medibles? Una taxonomía de criterios de logro para el monitoreo de la intervención vocal
title_full	¿Cómo construir objetivos operacionales medibles? Una taxonomía de criterios de logro para el monitoreo de la intervención vocal
title_fullStr	¿Cómo construir objetivos operacionales medibles? Una taxonomía de criterios de logro para el monitoreo de la intervención vocal
title_full_unstemmed	¿Cómo construir objetivos operacionales medibles? Una taxonomía de criterios de logro para el monitoreo de la intervención vocal
title_sort	¿cómo construir objetivos operacionales medibles? una taxonomía de criterios de logro para el monitoreo de la intervención vocal
description	Introducción. La complejidad del fenómeno vocal dificulta que el/la terapeuta monitoree de manera rápida y eficaz los logros obtenidos por el/la usuario/a mediante la intervención fonoaudiológica. La evaluación del avance terapéutico depende de la habilidad del/la terapeuta para emplear criterios de medición válidos, confiables y significativos. Objetivo. Desarrollar un modelo teórico de criterios de logro para su consideración en la formulación de los objetivos operacionales en las planificaciones terapéuticas que emplean los profesionales fonoaudiólogos en la atención de usuarios/as que presentan queja vocal. Metodología. Investigación cualitativa, de tipo conceptual y modélica, en la que se lleva a cabo una revisión crítica de la literatura a través de un muestreo teórico no probabilístico de los modelos teóricos propuestos para la formulación y medición de objetivos en el contexto terapéutico y sus alcances respecto de la intervención vocal. A partir de ello, se propone una taxonomía de criterios de logro para la verificación del avance terapéutico. Resultados. Se propone una taxonomía organizada en torno a criterios de logro cuantitativos, cualitativos y mixtos, los que son propuestos para el monitoreo de diversos aspectos de la función vocal en el contexto de la intervención fonoaudiológica. Conclusión. El modelo proporciona una guía precisa para evaluar de manera efectiva el progreso y los resultados alcanzados por el/la usuario/a en el abordaje fonoaudiológico vocal a través de los objetivos operacionales planteados para la intervención.
description_eng	Introduction. The complexity of the vocal phenomenon hinders the therapist's ability to quickly and effectively monitor the achievements obtained by the patient through vocal intervention. The assessment of therapeutic progress relies on the therapist's capability to utilize valid, reliable, and meaningful outcome masures. Aim. Develop a conceptual framework of outcome measures to be used in the treatment plans designed by speech therapists when attending to patients with vocal complaints. Methodology. Qualitative, conceptual, and model-type research in which a critical review is conducted through a non-probabilistic theoretical sampling of the theoretical models of therapy treatment plans, the outcome measures involved and their relevance to voice intervention. Building upon this, a taxonomy of outcome measures is proposed for verifying therapeutic progress in voice therapy. Results. A conceptual outcome measures framework is proposed. This model incorporates quantitative, qualitative, and mixed criteria to monitor the diverse aspects of vocal function in the context of voice intervention. Conclusion. The model provides a precise guide to assess the results achieved by the patient in vocal intervention through the operational goals.
author	Crisosto-Alarcón, Jaime
author_facet	Crisosto-Alarcón, Jaime
topicspa_str_mv	Planificación terapéutica objetivos logro disfonía fonoaudiología entrenamiento vocal rehabilitación
topic	Planificación terapéutica objetivos logro disfonía fonoaudiología entrenamiento vocal rehabilitación Treatment planning goals achievement voice voice disorders speech therapy voice training rehabilitation
topic_facet	Planificación terapéutica objetivos logro disfonía fonoaudiología entrenamiento vocal rehabilitación Treatment planning goals achievement voice voice disorders speech therapy voice training rehabilitation
citationvolume	5
citationissue	2
publisher	Fundación Universitaria María Cano
ispartofjournal	Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud
source	https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/230
language	spa
format	Article
rights	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2023 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references	Reghunathan S, Bryson PC. Components of Voice Evaluation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019 Aug;52(4):589-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2019.03.002 2. Romero L, Nercelles L, Olea K, Pérez R, Guzman M. Manual para la administración del protocolo de evaluación de la voz hablada (PEVOH). Santiago: Escuela de Fonoaudiología, Universidad de Chile; 2011. 43p. 3. Levack WM, Taylor K, Siegert RJ, Dean SG, McPherson KM, Weatherall M. Is goal planning in rehabilitation effective? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2006 Sep;20(9):739-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215506070791 4. Sivaraman Nair KP. Life goals: the concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2003 Mar;17(2):192-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr599oa 5. Wade DT. Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Apr;23(4):291-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215509103551 6. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Person-centered focus on function: Voice [Internet]. The Association; [citado 2023 May 31]. Available from: https://www.asha.org/siteassets/uploadedFiles/ICF-Voice-Disorders.pdf 7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Evaluation Guide. Writing SMART Objectives [Internet]. The Centers; [citado 2023 May 31]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/docs/smart_objectives.pdf 8. Dekker J, de Groot V, Ter Steeg AM, Vloothuis J, Holla J, Collette E, et al. Setting meaningful goals in rehabilitation: rationale and practical tool. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Jan;34(1):3-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519876299 9. Crisosto J. Propuesta teórica de planificación terapéutica en el área de voz: aplicación del modelo de la CIF. Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiología. 2021 Jun;20:1-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-4692.2021.58315 10. World Health Organization. Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud. The Organization; 2001Sept. 282 p. 11. Ogbeiwi O. Why written objectives need to be really SMART. British Journal of HealthCare Management, 2017;23(7):324-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2017.23.7.324 12. Ogbeiwi O. General concepts of goals and goal-setting in healthcare: A narrative review. Journal of Management & Organization, 2018;27(2):324-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.11 13. Mullins LJ. Management and Organisational Behaviour. Prentice Hall; 2009. 14. Hart T, Whyte J, Dijkers M, Packel A, Turkstra L, Zanca J, et al. Manual of Rehabilitation Treatment Specification [Internet]. 2018. 65 p. Disponible en: http://mrri.org/innovations/manual-for-rehabilitation-treatment-specification/ 15. Van Stan JH, Roy N, Awan S, Stemple J, Hillman RE. A taxonomy of voice therapy. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 May;24(2):101-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0030 16. Van Stan JH, Whyte J, Duffy JR, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Doyle P, Gherson S, et al. Voice Therapy According to the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Expert Consensus Ingredients and Targets. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Sep 23;30(5):2169-201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00076 17. Levack WMM, Siegert, RJ. Challenges in Theory, Practice and Evidence. In Siegert, RJ, Levack, WMM, editors. Rehabilitation Goal Setting. Theory, Practice and Evidence. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015. p. 3-20. 18. Levack WM, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, McPherson KM. Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: how clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):206-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.011 19. Scobbie L, Wyke S, Dixon D. Identifying and applying psychological theory to setting and achieving rehabilitation goals. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Apr;23(4):321-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215509102981 20. Siegert RJ, McPherson KM, Taylor WJ. Toward a cognitive-affective model of goal-setting in rehabilitation: is self-regulation theory a key step? Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Oct 21;26(20):1175-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001724834 21. Siegert RJ, Taylor WJ. Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Jan 7;26(1):1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001644932 22. Crisosto J, Flores A. Estructura de los objetivos terapéuticos en la intervención fonoaudiológica de usuarios con necesidades vocales: una revisión sistemática exploratoria. Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiología. 2022;21:1-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-4692.2022.64698 23. Castillo-Allendes A, Fouillioux C. Objetivos de intervención en voz: Una propuesta para su análisis y redacción. Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud. 2021;3(1):125-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.56 24. Van Stan JH, Whyte J, Duffy JR, Barkmeier-Kraemer JM, Doyle PB, Gherson S, et al. Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Methodology to Identify and Describe Unique Targets and Ingredients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Mar;102(3):521-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.383 25. Ma EP, Yiu EM, Abbott KV. Application of the ICF in voice disorders. Semin Speech Lang. 2007 Nov;28(4):343-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-986531 26. Levack WM, Weatherall M, Hay-Smith EJ, Dean SG, McPherson K, Siegert RJ. Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit for adults with acquired disability participating in rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 20;2015(7):CD009727. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009727.pub2 27. Bexelius A, Carlberg EB, Löwing K. Quality of goal setting in pediatric rehabilitation-A SMART approach. Child Care Health Dev. 2018 Nov;44(6):850-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12609 28. Page J, Roos K, Bänziger A, Margot-Cattin I, Agustoni S, Rossini E, et al. Formulating goals in occupational therapy: State of the art in Switzerland. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22(6):403-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2015.1049548 29. Hersh D, Worrall L, Howe T, Sherratt S, Davidson B. SMARTER goal setting in aphasia rehabilitation. Aphasiology. 2012;26:220-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.640392 30. MacLeod L. Making SMART goals smarter. Physician Exec. 2012;38(2):68-70. 31. Day T, Tosey P. Beyond SMART? A new framework for goal setting. The Curriculum Journal. 2011 Dec;22(4):515-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2011.627213 32. Lee, KPW. Planning for success: Setting SMART goals for study. British Journal of Midwifery. 2010 Nov;18(11):744-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2010.18.11.79568 33. Clarke SP, Crowe TP, Oades LG, Deane FP. Do goal-setting interventions improve the quality of goals in mental health services? Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2009;32(4):292-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.2975/32.4.2009.292.299 34. Bovend'Eerdt TJ, Botell RE, Wade DT. Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Apr;23(4):352-61. Erratum in: Clin Rehabil. 2010 Apr;24(4):382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508101741 35. Jung LA. Writing SMART Objectives and Strategies That Fit the ROUTINE. TEACHING Exceptional Children. 2007;39(4):54-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990703900406 36. van Herten LM, Gunning-Schepers LJ. Targets as a tool in health policy. Part I: Lessons learned. Health Policy. 2000 Aug;53(1):1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00081-6 37. Doran, GT. There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review. 1981 Nov;70(11):35-6. 38. Baker A, Cornwell P, Gustafsson L, Lannin NA. An exploration of goal-setting practices in Queensland rehabilitation services. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Aug;44(16):4368-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1906957 39. Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 Feb;258(2):77-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004050000299 40. Hirano M. Objective evaluation of the human voice: clinical aspects. Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1989;41(2-3):89-144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000265950 41. Krasny-Pacini A, Hiebel J, Pauly F, Godon S, Chevignard M. Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation: a literature-based update. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 Apr;56(3):212-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2013.02.002 42. Krasny-Pacini A, Evans J, Sohlberg MM, Chevignard M. Proposed Criteria for Appraising Goal Attainment Scales Used as Outcome Measures in Rehabilitation Research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jan;97(1):157-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.424 43. Ruble L, McGrew JH, Toland MD. Goal attainment scaling as an outcome measure in randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions in autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 Sep;42(9):1974-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1446-7 44. Hersh D, Sherratt S, Howe T, Worrall L, Davidson B, Ferguson A. An analysis of the “goal” in aphasia rehabilitation. Aphasiology. 2012;26(8):971-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2012.684339 45. Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J. 1968 Dec;4(6):443-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530764 46. Hamilton J, Sohlberg MM, Turkstra L. Opening the black box of cognitive rehabilitation: Integrating the ICF, RTSS, and PIE. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Sep 21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12774 47. Kucheria P, Moore Sohlberg M, Machalicek W, Seeley J, DeGarmo D. A single-case experimental design investigation of collaborative goal setting practices in hospital-based speech-language pathologists when provided supports to use motivational interviewing and goal attainment scaling. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2022 May;32(4):579-610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2020.1838301 48. Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Apr;23(4):362-70. Erratum in: Clin Rehabil. 2010 Feb;24(2):191. PMID: 19179355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508101742 49. Marsland E, Bowman J. An interactive education session and follow-up support as a strategy to improve clinicians' goal-writing skills: a randomized controlled trial. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):3-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01104.x 50. Bowman J, Mogensen L, Marsland E, Lannin N. The development, content validity and inter-rater reliability of the SMART-Goal Evaluation Method: A standardised method for evaluating clinical goals. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015 Dec;62(6):420-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12218 51. Dagnino SJ. Tipos de datos y escalas de medida. Revista Chilena de Anestesia. 2014; 43(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.25237/revchilanestv43n02.06 52. Forrest M, Andersen B. Ordinal scale and statistics in medical research. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Feb 22;292(6519):537-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.292.6519.537 53. Coronado, J. Escalas de medición. Paradigmas. 2007 Jul;2(2):104-25. Disponible en: https://publicaciones.unitec.edu.co/index.php/paradigmas/article/view/21 54. Law M. Measurement in Occupational Therapy: Scientific Criteria for Evaluation. Can J Occup Ther. 1987;54(3):133-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/000841748705400308 55. Besser MC, Moncada L. Proceso Psicoterapéutico Desde la Perspectiva de Terapeutas que Tratan Trastornos Alimentarios: Un Estudio Cualitativo. Psykhe. 2013;22(1):69-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.22.1.633 56. Caro-Gabalda I. El cambio terapeútico a través del modelo de asimilación : su aplicación en la terapia lingüística de evaluación. Rev de Psicopatol y Psicol Clin. 2011;16(3): 169-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.16.num.3.2011.10360 57. Patel RR, Awan SN, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Courey M, Deliyski D, Eadie T, et al. Recommended Protocols for Instrumental Assessment of Voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to Develop a Protocol for Instrumental Assessment of Vocal Function. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Aug 6;27(3):887-905. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0009 58. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Garellek M, Samlan R, Zhang Z. Toward a unified theory of voice production and perception. Loquens. 2014 Jan;1(1):e009. doi: https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2014.009 59. Azul D, Hancock AB, Nygren U. Forces Affecting Voice Function in Gender Diverse People Assigned Female at Birth. J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):662.e15-662.e34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.01.001 60. Azul D, Hancock AB. Who or what has the capacity to influence voice production? Development of a transdisciplinary theoretical approach to clinical practice addressing voice and the communication of speaker socio-cultural positioning. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Oct;22(5):559-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2019.1709544 61. Colton RH, Casper JK, Leonard R. Understanding Voice Problems. LWW; 2011. 496 p. 62. Mathieson L. Greene and Mathieson’s the voice and its disorders. Londres: Whurr; 2001. 750 p. 63. Coupland N. Social Context, Style, and Identity in Sociolinguistics. In: Holmes J, Hazen K, editors. Research Methods in Sociolinguistics: a Practical Guide. Wiley Blackwell; 2014, p. 290-303. 64. Ahearn LM. Agency and language. In: Jaspers J, Östman J, Verschueren J, editors. Society and language use. John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2010, p. 28-48. 65. Podesva RJ. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2007;11(4):478-504. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00334.x 66. Bucholtz M, Hall K. Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies. 2005;7(4-5):585-614. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 67. Agha A. The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication. 2003;23(3-4):231-73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0271-5309(03)00012-0 68. Rice DB, McIntyre A, Mirkowski M, Janzen S, Viana R, Britt E, et al. Patient-Centered Goal Setting in a Hospital-Based Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Center. PM R. 2017 Sep;9(9):856-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.12.004 69. Azul D. Transmasculine people's vocal situations: a critical review of gender-related discourses and empirical data. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015 Jan-Feb;50(1):31-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12121 70. Azul D. Gender-related aspects of transmasculine people's vocal situations: insights from a qualitative content analysis of interview transcripts. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Nov;51(6):672-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12239 71. Farías P. Ejercicios que restauran la función vocal (observaciones clínicas). 2nd ed. Akadia Editorial. 2020. 240 p. 72. Gillespie AI, Gartner-Schmidt J. Voice-Specialized Speech-Language Pathologist's Criteria for Discharge from Voice Therapy. J Voice. 2018 May;32(3):332-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.05.022 73. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x 74. Windschitl M. Folk theories of "inquiry:" How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2004;41(5):481-512. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20010 75. Jaakkola E. Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review. 2020;10:18-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0 76. Benoot C, Hannes K, Bilsen J. The use of purposeful sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: A worked example on sexual adjustment to a cancer trajectory. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 18;16: 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0114-6 77. Suri H. Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal. 2011;11(2):63-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063 78. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications; 2015. 832 p. 79. Martins RH, Tavares EL, Ranalli PF, Branco A, Pessin AB. Psychogenic dysphonia: diversity of clinical and vocal manifestations in a case series. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Nov-Dec;80(6):497-502. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.09.002 80. Willinger U, Aschauer HN. Personality, anxiety and functional dysphonia. Personality and Individual Differences. 2005;39(8):1441-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.011 81. MacCallum JK, Zhang Y, Jiang JJ. Vowel selection and its effects on perturbation and nonlinear dynamic measures. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63(2):88-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000319786 82. Jiang JJ, Zhang Y, McGilligan C. Chaos in voice, from modeling to measurement. J Voice. 2006 Mar;20(1):2-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.01.001 83. Titze IR. Voice training and therapy with a semi-occluded vocal tract: rationale and scientific underpinnings. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Apr;49(2):448-59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/035) 84. Boone DR. Dismissal criteria in voice therapy. J Speech Hear Disord. 1974 May;39(2):133-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.3902.133 85. Scobbie L, McLean D, Dixon D, Duncan E, Wyke S. Implementing a framework for goal setting in community based stroke rehabilitation: a process evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 May 24;13:190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-190 86. Rosewilliam S, Roskell CA, Pandyan AD. A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2011 Jun;25(6):501-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215510394467 87. Desjardins M, Halstead L, Cooke M, Bonilha HS. A Systematic Review of Voice Therapy: What "Effectiveness" Really Implies. J Voice. 2017 May;31(3):392.e13-392.e32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.002 88. Schneider S, Frens R. Training four-syllable CV patterns in individuals with acquired apraxia of speech: Theoretical implications. Aphasiology. 2005;19(3-5):451-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030444000886 89. Maas E, Barlow J, Robin D, Shapiro L. Treatment of sound errors in aphasia and apraxia of speech: Effects of phonological complexity. Aphasiology. 2002;16(4-6):609-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030244000266 90. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning. A Behavioral Emphasis. Human Kinetics Publishers; 2011. 592 p. 91. Maas E, Robin DA, Austermann Hula SN, Freedman SE, Wulf G, Ballard KJ, et al. Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 Aug;17(3):277-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025) 92. Grampurohit N, Mulcahey MJ. Outcome measures. In Abzug JM, Kozin S, Neiduski R, editors. Pediatric Hand Therapy. Elsevier, 2019. p. 31-56. 93. Diehm E. Writing Measurable and Academically Relevant IEP Goals With 80% Accuracy Over Three Consecutive Trials. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups. 2017;2(16):34-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/persp2.SIG16.34 94. Moore R. Beyond 80-Percent Accuracy. The ASHA Leader. 2018;23(5):6-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FMP.23052018.6 95. Cooper JO, Heron TE, Heward WL. Applied Behavior Analysis. Pearson UK; 2020. 952 p. 96. Richling SM, Williams WL, Carr JE. The effects of different mastery criteria on the skill maintenance of children with developmental disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 Jul;52(3):701-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.580 97. Love JR, Carr JE, Almason SM, Petursdottir AI. Early and intensive behavioral intervention for autism: A survey of clinical practices. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2009;3(2):421-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2008.08.008 98. Longino E, Richling SM, McDougale CB, Palmier JM. The Effects of Mastery Criteria on Maintenance: A Replication With Most-to-Least Prompting. Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Mar 15;15(2):397-405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00562-y 99. Fuller JL, Fienup DM. A Preliminary Analysis of Mastery Criterion Level: Effects on Response Maintenance. Behav Anal Pract. 2018;11(1):1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0201-0 100. Haq SS, Kodak T. Evaluating the effects of massed and distributed practice on acquisition and maintenance of tacts and textual behavior with typically developing children. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015;48(1):85-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.178 101. Kocher CP, Howard MR, Fienup DM. The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on skill acquisition for children with autism. Behav Modif. 2015 Jul;39(4):600-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445515583246 102. McDougale CB, Richling SM, Longino EB, O'Rourke SA. Mastery Criteria and Maintenance: a Descriptive Analysis of Applied Research Procedures. Behav Anal Pract. 2019 May 29;13(2):402-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00365-2 103. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Assessment of Voice Disorders [Internet]. The Association; [cited 2023 May 31]. Available from: https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/voice-disorders/#collapse_5 104. McAlister S, Yanushevskaya I. Voice assessment practices of speech and language therapists in Ireland. Clin Linguist Phon. 2020;34(1-2):29-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2019.1610798 105. Joshi A. A Comparison of the s/z Ratio to Instrumental Aerodynamic Measures of Phonation. J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):533-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.02.014 106. Poburka BJ, Patel RR, Bless DM. Voice-Vibratory Assessment With Laryngeal Imaging (VALI) Form: Reliability of Rating Stroboscopy and High-speed Videoendoscopy. J Voice. 2017 Jul;31(4):513.e1-513.e14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.12.003 107. Hillman RE, Stepp CE, Van Stan JH, Zañartu M, Mehta DD. An Updated Theoretical Framework for Vocal Hyperfunction. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Nov 12;29(4):2254-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00104 108. Husson R. Le chant. París: Presses Universitaires de France; 1962. 126 p. 109. Zaman J, Chalkia A, Zenses AK, Bilgin AS, Beckers T, Vervliet B, et al. Perceptual variability: Implications for learning and generalization. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Feb;28(1):1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01780-1 110. Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012 Oct;92(4):1651-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00048.2011 111. Héroux ME, Butler AA, Robertson LS, Fisher G, Gandevia SC. Proprioception: a new look at an old concept. J Appl Physiol. 2022 Mar 1;132(3):811-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00809.2021 112. Roa-Ordóñez HG, Quintana UB, Aponte-Ovalle JJ. Pedagogía de la propiocepción corporal en el cantante. Civilizar. 2020;20(38):11-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.22518/jour.ccsh/2020.1a05 113. López J. Protocolo de entrenamiento vocal fonoaudiológico para cantantes: Vocalical. Areté. 2019 Dec;19(2):61-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.33881/1657-2513.art.19207 114. Le Huche F, Allali A. La Voz: Terapéutica de los Trastornos Vocales. Volumen 4. Elsevier España; 2004. 195 p. 115. Ramos JS, Feniman MR, Gielow I, Silverio KCA. Correlation between Voice and Auditory Processing. J Voice. 2018 Nov;32(6):771.e25-771.e36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.011 116. Rodríguez-Parra MJ, Adrián JA, Casado JC. Voice therapy used to test a basic protocol for multidimensional assessment of dysphonia. J Voice. 2009 May;23(3):304-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.05.001 117. Behlau M, Madazio G, Feijó D, Azevedo R, Gielow I, Rehder M. Aperfeiçoamiento Vocal e Tratamento Fonoaudiológico das Disfonias. In Behlau M, editor. Voz O Livro do Especialista, Volume II. Revinter; 2010. p. 432-437. 118. Marks KL, Verdi A, Toles LE, Stipancic KL, Ortiz AJ, Hillman RE, et al. Psychometric Analysis of an Ecological Vocal Effort Scale in Individuals With and Without Vocal Hyperfunction During Activities of Daily Living. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Nov 4;30(6):2589-604. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00111 119. Helou LB, Jennings JR, Rosen CA, Wang W, Verdolini Abbott K. Intrinsic Laryngeal Muscle Response to a Public Speech Preparation Stressor: Personality and Autonomic Predictors. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Sep 15;63(9):2940-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00402 120. Helou LB, Wang W, Ashmore RC, Rosen CA, Verdolini Abbot K. Intrinsic laryngeal muscle activity in response to autonomic nervous system activation. Laryngoscope. 2013 Nov;123(11):2756-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24109 121. Dietrich M, Andreatta RD, Jiang Y, Joshi A, Stemple JC. Preliminary findings on the relation between the personality trait of stress reaction and the central neural control of human vocalization. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Aug;14(4):377-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2012.688865 122. Dietrich M, Verdolini Abbott K. Vocal function in introverts and extraverts during a psychological stress reactivity protocol. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Jun;55(3):973-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0344) 123. Mathieson L, Hirani SP, Epstein R, Baken RJ, Wood G, Rubin JS. Laryngeal manual therapy: a preliminary study to examine its treatment effects in the management of muscle tension dysphonia. J Voice. 2009 May;23(3):353-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.10.002 124. Martinez CC, Lemos IO, Madazio G, Behlau M, Cassol M. Vocal parameters, muscle palpation, self-perception of voice symptoms, pain, and vocal fatigue in women with muscle tension dysphonia. Codas. 2021 Aug 2;33(4):e20200035. Portuguese, English. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202020035 125. Calais-Germain B. La respiración: anatomía para el movimiento. Tomo IV. El gesto respiratorio. La liebre de marzo; 2007. 215 p. 126. Chaitow L, Walker DeLany J. Aplicación clínica de las técnicas neuromusculares. Tomo I. Badalona: Paidotribo; 2006. 274 p. 127. Angsuwarangsee T, Morrison M. Extrinsic laryngeal muscular tension in patients with voice disorders. J Voice. 2002 Sep;16(3):333-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00105-4 128. Lucchini E, Ricci Maccarini A, Bissoni E, Borragan M, Agudo M, González MJ, et al. Voice Improvement in Patients with Functional Dysphonia Treated with the Proprioceptive-Elastic (PROEL) Method. J Voice. 2018 Mar;32(2):209-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.05.018 129. Borragán A, Lucchini E, Agudo M, González M, Ricci A. Il Metodo Propriocettivo Elastico (PROEL) nella terapia vocale. Acta Phoniatrica Latina. 2008;30(1):18-50. Disponible en: https://www.voicecentercesena.it/assets/file/6364d3f0f495b6ab9dcf8d3b5c6e0b01.pdf 130. Lowell SY, Colton RH, Kelley RT, Auld M, Schmitz H. Isolated and Combined Respiratory Training for Muscle Tension Dysphonia: Preliminary Findings. J Voice. 2022 May;36(3):361-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.06.013 131. Van Lierde KM, Claeys S, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberge P. Outcome of laryngeal and velopharyngeal biofeedback treatment in children and young adults: a pilot study. J Voice. 2004 Mar;18(1):97-106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2002.09.001 132. González R, Donoso A. Programa de rehabilitación fonoaudiológica para pacientes afásicos. Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiología. 2000;2(3):35-48.
type_driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content	Text
publishDate	2023-11-30
date_accessioned	2023-11-30T16:21:14Z
date_available	2023-11-30T16:21:14Z
url	https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/230
url_doi	https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.230
eissn	2665-2056
doi	10.46634/riics.230
citationstartpage	205
citationendpage	231
url3_str_mv	https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/230/870 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/230/873
url4_str_mv	https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/230/871 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/230/874
url2_str_mv	https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/230/872 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/230/875
_version_	1811200651180376064
spelling	¿Cómo construir objetivos operacionales medibles? Una taxonomía de criterios de logro para el monitoreo de la intervención vocal ¿Cómo construir objetivos operacionales medibles? Una taxonomía de criterios de logro para el monitoreo de la intervención vocal Introducción. La complejidad del fenómeno vocal dificulta que el/la terapeuta monitoree de manera rápida y eficaz los logros obtenidos por el/la usuario/a mediante la intervención fonoaudiológica. La evaluación del avance terapéutico depende de la habilidad del/la terapeuta para emplear criterios de medición válidos, confiables y significativos. Objetivo. Desarrollar un modelo teórico de criterios de logro para su consideración en la formulación de los objetivos operacionales en las planificaciones terapéuticas que emplean los profesionales fonoaudiólogos en la atención de usuarios/as que presentan queja vocal. Metodología. Investigación cualitativa, de tipo conceptual y modélica, en la que se lleva a cabo una revisión crítica de la literatura a través de un muestreo teórico no probabilístico de los modelos teóricos propuestos para la formulación y medición de objetivos en el contexto terapéutico y sus alcances respecto de la intervención vocal. A partir de ello, se propone una taxonomía de criterios de logro para la verificación del avance terapéutico. Resultados. Se propone una taxonomía organizada en torno a criterios de logro cuantitativos, cualitativos y mixtos, los que son propuestos para el monitoreo de diversos aspectos de la función vocal en el contexto de la intervención fonoaudiológica. Conclusión. El modelo proporciona una guía precisa para evaluar de manera efectiva el progreso y los resultados alcanzados por el/la usuario/a en el abordaje fonoaudiológico vocal a través de los objetivos operacionales planteados para la intervención. Introduction. The complexity of the vocal phenomenon hinders the therapist's ability to quickly and effectively monitor the achievements obtained by the patient through vocal intervention. The assessment of therapeutic progress relies on the therapist's capability to utilize valid, reliable, and meaningful outcome masures. Aim. Develop a conceptual framework of outcome measures to be used in the treatment plans designed by speech therapists when attending to patients with vocal complaints. Methodology. Qualitative, conceptual, and model-type research in which a critical review is conducted through a non-probabilistic theoretical sampling of the theoretical models of therapy treatment plans, the outcome measures involved and their relevance to voice intervention. Building upon this, a taxonomy of outcome measures is proposed for verifying therapeutic progress in voice therapy. Results. A conceptual outcome measures framework is proposed. This model incorporates quantitative, qualitative, and mixed criteria to monitor the diverse aspects of vocal function in the context of voice intervention. Conclusion. The model provides a precise guide to assess the results achieved by the patient in vocal intervention through the operational goals. Crisosto-Alarcón, Jaime Planificación terapéutica objetivos logro voz disfonía fonoaudiología entrenamiento vocal rehabilitación Treatment planning goals achievement voice voice disorders speech therapy voice training rehabilitation 5 2 Artículo de revista Journal article 2023-11-30T16:21:14Z 2023-11-30T16:21:14Z 2023-11-30 text/html text/xml application/pdf text/html text/xml application/pdf Fundación Universitaria María Cano Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud 2665-2056 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/230 10.46634/riics.230 https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.230 spa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2023 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. 205 231 Reghunathan S, Bryson PC. Components of Voice Evaluation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019 Aug;52(4):589-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2019.03.002 2. Romero L, Nercelles L, Olea K, Pérez R, Guzman M. Manual para la administración del protocolo de evaluación de la voz hablada (PEVOH). Santiago: Escuela de Fonoaudiología, Universidad de Chile; 2011. 43p. 3. Levack WM, Taylor K, Siegert RJ, Dean SG, McPherson KM, Weatherall M. Is goal planning in rehabilitation effective? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2006 Sep;20(9):739-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215506070791 4. Sivaraman Nair KP. Life goals: the concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2003 Mar;17(2):192-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr599oa 5. Wade DT. Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Apr;23(4):291-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215509103551 6. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Person-centered focus on function: Voice [Internet]. The Association; [citado 2023 May 31]. Available from: https://www.asha.org/siteassets/uploadedFiles/ICF-Voice-Disorders.pdf 7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Evaluation Guide. Writing SMART Objectives [Internet]. The Centers; [citado 2023 May 31]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/docs/smart_objectives.pdf 8. Dekker J, de Groot V, Ter Steeg AM, Vloothuis J, Holla J, Collette E, et al. Setting meaningful goals in rehabilitation: rationale and practical tool. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Jan;34(1):3-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519876299 9. Crisosto J. Propuesta teórica de planificación terapéutica en el área de voz: aplicación del modelo de la CIF. Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiología. 2021 Jun;20:1-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-4692.2021.58315 10. World Health Organization. Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud. The Organization; 2001Sept. 282 p. 11. Ogbeiwi O. Why written objectives need to be really SMART. British Journal of HealthCare Management, 2017;23(7):324-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2017.23.7.324 12. Ogbeiwi O. General concepts of goals and goal-setting in healthcare: A narrative review. Journal of Management & Organization, 2018;27(2):324-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.11 13. Mullins LJ. Management and Organisational Behaviour. Prentice Hall; 2009. 14. Hart T, Whyte J, Dijkers M, Packel A, Turkstra L, Zanca J, et al. Manual of Rehabilitation Treatment Specification [Internet]. 2018. 65 p. Disponible en: http://mrri.org/innovations/manual-for-rehabilitation-treatment-specification/ 15. Van Stan JH, Roy N, Awan S, Stemple J, Hillman RE. A taxonomy of voice therapy. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 May;24(2):101-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0030 16. Van Stan JH, Whyte J, Duffy JR, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Doyle P, Gherson S, et al. Voice Therapy According to the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Expert Consensus Ingredients and Targets. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Sep 23;30(5):2169-201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00076 17. Levack WMM, Siegert, RJ. Challenges in Theory, Practice and Evidence. In Siegert, RJ, Levack, WMM, editors. Rehabilitation Goal Setting. Theory, Practice and Evidence. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015. p. 3-20. 18. Levack WM, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, McPherson KM. Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: how clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):206-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.011 19. Scobbie L, Wyke S, Dixon D. Identifying and applying psychological theory to setting and achieving rehabilitation goals. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Apr;23(4):321-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215509102981 20. Siegert RJ, McPherson KM, Taylor WJ. Toward a cognitive-affective model of goal-setting in rehabilitation: is self-regulation theory a key step? Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Oct 21;26(20):1175-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001724834 21. Siegert RJ, Taylor WJ. Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Jan 7;26(1):1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001644932 22. Crisosto J, Flores A. Estructura de los objetivos terapéuticos en la intervención fonoaudiológica de usuarios con necesidades vocales: una revisión sistemática exploratoria. Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiología. 2022;21:1-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-4692.2022.64698 23. Castillo-Allendes A, Fouillioux C. Objetivos de intervención en voz: Una propuesta para su análisis y redacción. Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud. 2021;3(1):125-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.56 24. Van Stan JH, Whyte J, Duffy JR, Barkmeier-Kraemer JM, Doyle PB, Gherson S, et al. Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Methodology to Identify and Describe Unique Targets and Ingredients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Mar;102(3):521-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.383 25. Ma EP, Yiu EM, Abbott KV. Application of the ICF in voice disorders. Semin Speech Lang. 2007 Nov;28(4):343-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-986531 26. Levack WM, Weatherall M, Hay-Smith EJ, Dean SG, McPherson K, Siegert RJ. Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit for adults with acquired disability participating in rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 20;2015(7):CD009727. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009727.pub2 27. Bexelius A, Carlberg EB, Löwing K. Quality of goal setting in pediatric rehabilitation-A SMART approach. Child Care Health Dev. 2018 Nov;44(6):850-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12609 28. Page J, Roos K, Bänziger A, Margot-Cattin I, Agustoni S, Rossini E, et al. Formulating goals in occupational therapy: State of the art in Switzerland. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22(6):403-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2015.1049548 29. Hersh D, Worrall L, Howe T, Sherratt S, Davidson B. SMARTER goal setting in aphasia rehabilitation. Aphasiology. 2012;26:220-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.640392 30. MacLeod L. Making SMART goals smarter. Physician Exec. 2012;38(2):68-70. 31. Day T, Tosey P. Beyond SMART? A new framework for goal setting. The Curriculum Journal. 2011 Dec;22(4):515-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2011.627213 32. Lee, KPW. Planning for success: Setting SMART goals for study. British Journal of Midwifery. 2010 Nov;18(11):744-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2010.18.11.79568 33. Clarke SP, Crowe TP, Oades LG, Deane FP. Do goal-setting interventions improve the quality of goals in mental health services? Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2009;32(4):292-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.2975/32.4.2009.292.299 34. Bovend'Eerdt TJ, Botell RE, Wade DT. Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Apr;23(4):352-61. Erratum in: Clin Rehabil. 2010 Apr;24(4):382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508101741 35. Jung LA. Writing SMART Objectives and Strategies That Fit the ROUTINE. TEACHING Exceptional Children. 2007;39(4):54-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990703900406 36. van Herten LM, Gunning-Schepers LJ. Targets as a tool in health policy. Part I: Lessons learned. Health Policy. 2000 Aug;53(1):1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00081-6 37. Doran, GT. There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review. 1981 Nov;70(11):35-6. 38. Baker A, Cornwell P, Gustafsson L, Lannin NA. An exploration of goal-setting practices in Queensland rehabilitation services. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Aug;44(16):4368-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1906957 39. Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 Feb;258(2):77-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004050000299 40. Hirano M. Objective evaluation of the human voice: clinical aspects. Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1989;41(2-3):89-144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000265950 41. Krasny-Pacini A, Hiebel J, Pauly F, Godon S, Chevignard M. Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation: a literature-based update. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 Apr;56(3):212-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2013.02.002 42. Krasny-Pacini A, Evans J, Sohlberg MM, Chevignard M. Proposed Criteria for Appraising Goal Attainment Scales Used as Outcome Measures in Rehabilitation Research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jan;97(1):157-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.424 43. Ruble L, McGrew JH, Toland MD. Goal attainment scaling as an outcome measure in randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions in autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 Sep;42(9):1974-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1446-7 44. Hersh D, Sherratt S, Howe T, Worrall L, Davidson B, Ferguson A. An analysis of the “goal” in aphasia rehabilitation. Aphasiology. 2012;26(8):971-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2012.684339 45. Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J. 1968 Dec;4(6):443-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530764 46. Hamilton J, Sohlberg MM, Turkstra L. Opening the black box of cognitive rehabilitation: Integrating the ICF, RTSS, and PIE. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Sep 21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12774 47. Kucheria P, Moore Sohlberg M, Machalicek W, Seeley J, DeGarmo D. A single-case experimental design investigation of collaborative goal setting practices in hospital-based speech-language pathologists when provided supports to use motivational interviewing and goal attainment scaling. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2022 May;32(4):579-610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2020.1838301 48. Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Apr;23(4):362-70. Erratum in: Clin Rehabil. 2010 Feb;24(2):191. PMID: 19179355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508101742 49. Marsland E, Bowman J. An interactive education session and follow-up support as a strategy to improve clinicians' goal-writing skills: a randomized controlled trial. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):3-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01104.x 50. Bowman J, Mogensen L, Marsland E, Lannin N. The development, content validity and inter-rater reliability of the SMART-Goal Evaluation Method: A standardised method for evaluating clinical goals. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015 Dec;62(6):420-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12218 51. Dagnino SJ. Tipos de datos y escalas de medida. Revista Chilena de Anestesia. 2014; 43(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.25237/revchilanestv43n02.06 52. Forrest M, Andersen B. Ordinal scale and statistics in medical research. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Feb 22;292(6519):537-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.292.6519.537 53. Coronado, J. Escalas de medición. Paradigmas. 2007 Jul;2(2):104-25. Disponible en: https://publicaciones.unitec.edu.co/index.php/paradigmas/article/view/21 54. Law M. Measurement in Occupational Therapy: Scientific Criteria for Evaluation. Can J Occup Ther. 1987;54(3):133-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/000841748705400308 55. Besser MC, Moncada L. Proceso Psicoterapéutico Desde la Perspectiva de Terapeutas que Tratan Trastornos Alimentarios: Un Estudio Cualitativo. Psykhe. 2013;22(1):69-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.22.1.633 56. Caro-Gabalda I. El cambio terapeútico a través del modelo de asimilación : su aplicación en la terapia lingüística de evaluación. Rev de Psicopatol y Psicol Clin. 2011;16(3): 169-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.16.num.3.2011.10360 57. Patel RR, Awan SN, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Courey M, Deliyski D, Eadie T, et al. Recommended Protocols for Instrumental Assessment of Voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to Develop a Protocol for Instrumental Assessment of Vocal Function. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Aug 6;27(3):887-905. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0009 58. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Garellek M, Samlan R, Zhang Z. Toward a unified theory of voice production and perception. Loquens. 2014 Jan;1(1):e009. doi: https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2014.009 59. Azul D, Hancock AB, Nygren U. Forces Affecting Voice Function in Gender Diverse People Assigned Female at Birth. J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):662.e15-662.e34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.01.001 60. Azul D, Hancock AB. Who or what has the capacity to influence voice production? Development of a transdisciplinary theoretical approach to clinical practice addressing voice and the communication of speaker socio-cultural positioning. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Oct;22(5):559-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2019.1709544 61. Colton RH, Casper JK, Leonard R. Understanding Voice Problems. LWW; 2011. 496 p. 62. Mathieson L. Greene and Mathieson’s the voice and its disorders. Londres: Whurr; 2001. 750 p. 63. Coupland N. Social Context, Style, and Identity in Sociolinguistics. In: Holmes J, Hazen K, editors. Research Methods in Sociolinguistics: a Practical Guide. Wiley Blackwell; 2014, p. 290-303. 64. Ahearn LM. Agency and language. In: Jaspers J, Östman J, Verschueren J, editors. Society and language use. John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2010, p. 28-48. 65. Podesva RJ. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2007;11(4):478-504. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00334.x 66. Bucholtz M, Hall K. Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies. 2005;7(4-5):585-614. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 67. Agha A. The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication. 2003;23(3-4):231-73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0271-5309(03)00012-0 68. Rice DB, McIntyre A, Mirkowski M, Janzen S, Viana R, Britt E, et al. Patient-Centered Goal Setting in a Hospital-Based Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Center. PM R. 2017 Sep;9(9):856-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.12.004 69. Azul D. Transmasculine people's vocal situations: a critical review of gender-related discourses and empirical data. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015 Jan-Feb;50(1):31-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12121 70. Azul D. Gender-related aspects of transmasculine people's vocal situations: insights from a qualitative content analysis of interview transcripts. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Nov;51(6):672-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12239 71. Farías P. Ejercicios que restauran la función vocal (observaciones clínicas). 2nd ed. Akadia Editorial. 2020. 240 p. 72. Gillespie AI, Gartner-Schmidt J. Voice-Specialized Speech-Language Pathologist's Criteria for Discharge from Voice Therapy. J Voice. 2018 May;32(3):332-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.05.022 73. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x 74. Windschitl M. Folk theories of "inquiry:" How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2004;41(5):481-512. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20010 75. Jaakkola E. Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review. 2020;10:18-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0 76. Benoot C, Hannes K, Bilsen J. The use of purposeful sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: A worked example on sexual adjustment to a cancer trajectory. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 18;16: 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0114-6 77. Suri H. Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal. 2011;11(2):63-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063 78. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications; 2015. 832 p. 79. Martins RH, Tavares EL, Ranalli PF, Branco A, Pessin AB. Psychogenic dysphonia: diversity of clinical and vocal manifestations in a case series. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Nov-Dec;80(6):497-502. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.09.002 80. Willinger U, Aschauer HN. Personality, anxiety and functional dysphonia. Personality and Individual Differences. 2005;39(8):1441-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.011 81. MacCallum JK, Zhang Y, Jiang JJ. Vowel selection and its effects on perturbation and nonlinear dynamic measures. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63(2):88-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000319786 82. Jiang JJ, Zhang Y, McGilligan C. Chaos in voice, from modeling to measurement. J Voice. 2006 Mar;20(1):2-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.01.001 83. Titze IR. Voice training and therapy with a semi-occluded vocal tract: rationale and scientific underpinnings. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Apr;49(2):448-59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/035) 84. Boone DR. Dismissal criteria in voice therapy. J Speech Hear Disord. 1974 May;39(2):133-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.3902.133 85. Scobbie L, McLean D, Dixon D, Duncan E, Wyke S. Implementing a framework for goal setting in community based stroke rehabilitation: a process evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 May 24;13:190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-190 86. Rosewilliam S, Roskell CA, Pandyan AD. A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2011 Jun;25(6):501-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215510394467 87. Desjardins M, Halstead L, Cooke M, Bonilha HS. A Systematic Review of Voice Therapy: What "Effectiveness" Really Implies. J Voice. 2017 May;31(3):392.e13-392.e32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.002 88. Schneider S, Frens R. Training four-syllable CV patterns in individuals with acquired apraxia of speech: Theoretical implications. Aphasiology. 2005;19(3-5):451-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030444000886 89. Maas E, Barlow J, Robin D, Shapiro L. Treatment of sound errors in aphasia and apraxia of speech: Effects of phonological complexity. Aphasiology. 2002;16(4-6):609-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030244000266 90. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning. A Behavioral Emphasis. Human Kinetics Publishers; 2011. 592 p. 91. Maas E, Robin DA, Austermann Hula SN, Freedman SE, Wulf G, Ballard KJ, et al. Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 Aug;17(3):277-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025) 92. Grampurohit N, Mulcahey MJ. Outcome measures. In Abzug JM, Kozin S, Neiduski R, editors. Pediatric Hand Therapy. Elsevier, 2019. p. 31-56. 93. Diehm E. Writing Measurable and Academically Relevant IEP Goals With 80% Accuracy Over Three Consecutive Trials. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups. 2017;2(16):34-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/persp2.SIG16.34 94. Moore R. Beyond 80-Percent Accuracy. The ASHA Leader. 2018;23(5):6-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FMP.23052018.6 95. Cooper JO, Heron TE, Heward WL. Applied Behavior Analysis. Pearson UK; 2020. 952 p. 96. Richling SM, Williams WL, Carr JE. The effects of different mastery criteria on the skill maintenance of children with developmental disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 Jul;52(3):701-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.580 97. Love JR, Carr JE, Almason SM, Petursdottir AI. Early and intensive behavioral intervention for autism: A survey of clinical practices. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2009;3(2):421-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2008.08.008 98. Longino E, Richling SM, McDougale CB, Palmier JM. The Effects of Mastery Criteria on Maintenance: A Replication With Most-to-Least Prompting. Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Mar 15;15(2):397-405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00562-y 99. Fuller JL, Fienup DM. A Preliminary Analysis of Mastery Criterion Level: Effects on Response Maintenance. Behav Anal Pract. 2018;11(1):1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0201-0 100. Haq SS, Kodak T. Evaluating the effects of massed and distributed practice on acquisition and maintenance of tacts and textual behavior with typically developing children. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015;48(1):85-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.178 101. Kocher CP, Howard MR, Fienup DM. The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on skill acquisition for children with autism. Behav Modif. 2015 Jul;39(4):600-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445515583246 102. McDougale CB, Richling SM, Longino EB, O'Rourke SA. Mastery Criteria and Maintenance: a Descriptive Analysis of Applied Research Procedures. Behav Anal Pract. 2019 May 29;13(2):402-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00365-2 103. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Assessment of Voice Disorders [Internet]. The Association; [cited 2023 May 31]. Available from: https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/voice-disorders/#collapse_5 104. McAlister S, Yanushevskaya I. Voice assessment practices of speech and language therapists in Ireland. Clin Linguist Phon. 2020;34(1-2):29-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2019.1610798 105. Joshi A. A Comparison of the s/z Ratio to Instrumental Aerodynamic Measures of Phonation. J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):533-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.02.014 106. Poburka BJ, Patel RR, Bless DM. Voice-Vibratory Assessment With Laryngeal Imaging (VALI) Form: Reliability of Rating Stroboscopy and High-speed Videoendoscopy. J Voice. 2017 Jul;31(4):513.e1-513.e14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.12.003 107. Hillman RE, Stepp CE, Van Stan JH, Zañartu M, Mehta DD. An Updated Theoretical Framework for Vocal Hyperfunction. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Nov 12;29(4):2254-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00104 108. Husson R. Le chant. París: Presses Universitaires de France; 1962. 126 p. 109. Zaman J, Chalkia A, Zenses AK, Bilgin AS, Beckers T, Vervliet B, et al. Perceptual variability: Implications for learning and generalization. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Feb;28(1):1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01780-1 110. Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012 Oct;92(4):1651-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00048.2011 111. Héroux ME, Butler AA, Robertson LS, Fisher G, Gandevia SC. Proprioception: a new look at an old concept. J Appl Physiol. 2022 Mar 1;132(3):811-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00809.2021 112. Roa-Ordóñez HG, Quintana UB, Aponte-Ovalle JJ. Pedagogía de la propiocepción corporal en el cantante. Civilizar. 2020;20(38):11-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.22518/jour.ccsh/2020.1a05 113. López J. Protocolo de entrenamiento vocal fonoaudiológico para cantantes: Vocalical. Areté. 2019 Dec;19(2):61-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.33881/1657-2513.art.19207 114. Le Huche F, Allali A. La Voz: Terapéutica de los Trastornos Vocales. Volumen 4. Elsevier España; 2004. 195 p. 115. Ramos JS, Feniman MR, Gielow I, Silverio KCA. Correlation between Voice and Auditory Processing. J Voice. 2018 Nov;32(6):771.e25-771.e36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.011 116. Rodríguez-Parra MJ, Adrián JA, Casado JC. Voice therapy used to test a basic protocol for multidimensional assessment of dysphonia. J Voice. 2009 May;23(3):304-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.05.001 117. Behlau M, Madazio G, Feijó D, Azevedo R, Gielow I, Rehder M. Aperfeiçoamiento Vocal e Tratamento Fonoaudiológico das Disfonias. In Behlau M, editor. Voz O Livro do Especialista, Volume II. Revinter; 2010. p. 432-437. 118. Marks KL, Verdi A, Toles LE, Stipancic KL, Ortiz AJ, Hillman RE, et al. Psychometric Analysis of an Ecological Vocal Effort Scale in Individuals With and Without Vocal Hyperfunction During Activities of Daily Living. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Nov 4;30(6):2589-604. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00111 119. Helou LB, Jennings JR, Rosen CA, Wang W, Verdolini Abbott K. Intrinsic Laryngeal Muscle Response to a Public Speech Preparation Stressor: Personality and Autonomic Predictors. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Sep 15;63(9):2940-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00402 120. Helou LB, Wang W, Ashmore RC, Rosen CA, Verdolini Abbot K. Intrinsic laryngeal muscle activity in response to autonomic nervous system activation. Laryngoscope. 2013 Nov;123(11):2756-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24109 121. Dietrich M, Andreatta RD, Jiang Y, Joshi A, Stemple JC. Preliminary findings on the relation between the personality trait of stress reaction and the central neural control of human vocalization. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Aug;14(4):377-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2012.688865 122. Dietrich M, Verdolini Abbott K. Vocal function in introverts and extraverts during a psychological stress reactivity protocol. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Jun;55(3):973-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0344) 123. Mathieson L, Hirani SP, Epstein R, Baken RJ, Wood G, Rubin JS. Laryngeal manual therapy: a preliminary study to examine its treatment effects in the management of muscle tension dysphonia. J Voice. 2009 May;23(3):353-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.10.002 124. Martinez CC, Lemos IO, Madazio G, Behlau M, Cassol M. Vocal parameters, muscle palpation, self-perception of voice symptoms, pain, and vocal fatigue in women with muscle tension dysphonia. Codas. 2021 Aug 2;33(4):e20200035. Portuguese, English. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202020035 125. Calais-Germain B. La respiración: anatomía para el movimiento. Tomo IV. El gesto respiratorio. La liebre de marzo; 2007. 215 p. 126. Chaitow L, Walker DeLany J. Aplicación clínica de las técnicas neuromusculares. Tomo I. Badalona: Paidotribo; 2006. 274 p. 127. Angsuwarangsee T, Morrison M. Extrinsic laryngeal muscular tension in patients with voice disorders. J Voice. 2002 Sep;16(3):333-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00105-4 128. Lucchini E, Ricci Maccarini A, Bissoni E, Borragan M, Agudo M, González MJ, et al. Voice Improvement in Patients with Functional Dysphonia Treated with the Proprioceptive-Elastic (PROEL) Method. J Voice. 2018 Mar;32(2):209-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.05.018 129. Borragán A, Lucchini E, Agudo M, González M, Ricci A. Il Metodo Propriocettivo Elastico (PROEL) nella terapia vocale. Acta Phoniatrica Latina. 2008;30(1):18-50. Disponible en: https://www.voicecentercesena.it/assets/file/6364d3f0f495b6ab9dcf8d3b5c6e0b01.pdf 130. Lowell SY, Colton RH, Kelley RT, Auld M, Schmitz H. Isolated and Combined Respiratory Training for Muscle Tension Dysphonia: Preliminary Findings. J Voice. 2022 May;36(3):361-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.06.013 131. Van Lierde KM, Claeys S, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberge P. Outcome of laryngeal and velopharyngeal biofeedback treatment in children and young adults: a pilot study. J Voice. 2004 Mar;18(1):97-106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2002.09.001 132. González R, Donoso A. Programa de rehabilitación fonoaudiológica para pacientes afásicos. Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiología. 2000;2(3):35-48. https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/230/870 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/230/871 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/230/872 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/230/873 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/230/874 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/230/875 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREV info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication

¿Cómo construir objetivos operacionales medibles? Una taxonomía de criterios de logro para el monitoreo de la intervención vocal .

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares

¿Cómo construir objetivos operacionales medibles? Una taxonomía de criterios de logro para el monitoreo de la intervención vocal
.