Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS)

Velandrino-Nicolás, Antonio; Cabello Luque, Francisco; Monteagudo-Santamaría, María; Gómez-Cobos, Lidia

doi:10.46634/riics.228

Titulo:

Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS)
.

Sumario:

Objetivo. El objetivo de este estudio fue establecer valores normativos para la escala Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) en población comunitaria española (sin problemas de voz), utilizando una muestra de un área extensa del sureste de España. Metodología. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 115 personas (60 mujeres y 55 hombres) con edades comprendidas entre los 16 y 87 años. Los participantes eran familiares que acompañaron a los pacientes a las sesiones clínicas de ORL y de Logopedia de un hospital de referencia de la Región de Murcia, así como personal del hospital. Todos declararon no padecer ningún trastorno de la voz. Resultados. Los valores normativos obtenidos en este estudio para el VoiSS fueron 14.61 (SD=8.18) para la puntuación total, 7.5... Ver más

Guardado en:

Revista:

Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud

EISSN:

2665-2056

Autores:

Velandrino-Nicolás, Antonio

Cabello Luque, Francisco

Monteagudo-Santamaría, María

Gómez-Cobos, Lidia

Editor:

FUNDACION UNIVERSITARIA MARIA CANO

DOI:

10.46634/riics.228

Volumen:

Año de publicación:

2023-11-30

Pagina inicial:

Pagina final:

Pais:

Palabras claves:

estadísticas poblacionales

psicometría

Licencia:

Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2023

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id	metarevistapublica_fumc_revistadeinvestigacioneinnovacionencienciasdelasalud_67_article_228
record_format	ojs
institution	FUNDACION UNIVERSITARIA MARIA CANO
thumbnail	https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/FUNDACIONUNIVERSITARIAMARIACANO/logo.png
country_str	Colombia
collection	Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud
title	Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS)
spellingShingle	Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) Velandrino-Nicolás, Antonio Cabello Luque, Francisco Monteagudo-Santamaría, María Gómez-Cobos, Lidia VoiSS trastornos de la voz calidad de la voz ronquera escala cuestionario autoinforme estadísticas poblacionales psicometría VoiSS voice voice disorders voice quality voice hoarseness scale questionnaire self report population statistics psychometrics
title_short	Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS)
title_full	Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS)
title_fullStr	Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS)
title_full_unstemmed	Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS)
title_sort	valores normativos para la versión española de la voice symptom scale (voiss)
description	Objetivo. El objetivo de este estudio fue establecer valores normativos para la escala Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) en población comunitaria española (sin problemas de voz), utilizando una muestra de un área extensa del sureste de España. Metodología. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 115 personas (60 mujeres y 55 hombres) con edades comprendidas entre los 16 y 87 años. Los participantes eran familiares que acompañaron a los pacientes a las sesiones clínicas de ORL y de Logopedia de un hospital de referencia de la Región de Murcia, así como personal del hospital. Todos declararon no padecer ningún trastorno de la voz. Resultados. Los valores normativos obtenidos en este estudio para el VoiSS fueron 14.61 (SD=8.18) para la puntuación total, 7.57 (SD = 5.42) para la subescala Limitación, 1.04 (SD = 1.65) para la subescala Emocional y 5.99 (SD = 3.61) para la subescala Física. Los valores percentílicos se obtuvieron también para la escala VoiSS y para sus tres subescalas. Conclusiones. Este estudio presenta valores normativos para la escala VoiSS que no han sido todavía obtenidos en España. Estos valores pueden utilizarse como referencia para detectar posibles trastornos de voz.
description_eng	Objective. The aim of this study was to establish normative values for the Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) in the Spanish community population (without voice problems), using a sample from a large area of southeastern Spain. Method. The sample consisted of 115 adults from ages 16 to 87, 60 of whom were women and 55 were men. Participants included the family members of patients who attended the Otorhinolaryngology (ENT) and Speech Therapy Clinic at a referral hospital in the region of Murcia, Spain, and some of the clinic’s staff. All the participants reported never having suffered from any voice disorder before. Results. The normative values obtained in this study for the VoiSS were 14.61 (SD=8.18) for the total score, 7.57 (SD = 5.42) for the Impairment subscale, 1.04 (SD = 1.65) for the Emotional subscale, and 5.99 (SD = 3.61) for the Physical subscale. The percentile values were also obtained for the VoiSS scale and for its three subscales. Conclusions. This study presents normative values for the VoiSS scale that have not previously been obtained in Spain. These values can be used as a reference to detect possible voice disorders.
author	Velandrino-Nicolás, Antonio Cabello Luque, Francisco Monteagudo-Santamaría, María Gómez-Cobos, Lidia
author_facet	Velandrino-Nicolás, Antonio Cabello Luque, Francisco Monteagudo-Santamaría, María Gómez-Cobos, Lidia
topicspa_str_mv	VoiSS trastornos de la voz calidad de la voz ronquera escala cuestionario autoinforme estadísticas poblacionales psicometría
topic	VoiSS trastornos de la voz calidad de la voz ronquera escala cuestionario autoinforme estadísticas poblacionales psicometría VoiSS voice voice disorders voice quality voice hoarseness scale questionnaire self report population statistics psychometrics
topic_facet	VoiSS trastornos de la voz calidad de la voz ronquera escala cuestionario autoinforme estadísticas poblacionales psicometría VoiSS voice voice disorders voice quality voice hoarseness scale questionnaire self report population statistics psychometrics
citationvolume	5
citationissue	2
publisher	Fundación Universitaria María Cano
ispartofjournal	Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud
source	https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/228
language	eng
format	Article
rights	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2023 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references_eng	Hogikyan ND, Rosen CA. A Review of Outcome Measurements for Voice Disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2002 May;126(5):562–72. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2002.124850 2. World Health Organization. WHOQOL measuring quality of life [Internet]. New York: WHO; 2012. Available from: https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol 3. Lohr K. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(3):193-205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015291021312 4. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, Scott JA, Rock EP, Dawisha S, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007;10(suppl 2):S125-37.. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00275.x 5. Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2001 Feb;258(2):77–82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004050000299 6. Branski RC, Cukier-Blaj S, Pusic A, Cano SJ, Klassen A, Mener D, et al. Measuring quality of life in dysphonic patients: A systematic review of content development in patient-reported outcomes measures. J Voice. 2010;24(2):193-8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.05.006 7. Francis DO, Daniero JJ, Hovis KL, Sathe N, Jacobson B, Penson DF, et al. Voice-related patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review of instrument development and validation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(1):62-88. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0022 8. Deary IJ, Wilson JA, Carding PN, McKenzie, K. VoiSS: a patient-derived voice symptom scale. J Psychosom Res. 2003;54(5):483-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00469-5 9. Webb AL, Carding PN, Deary IJ, MacKenzie K, Steen IN, Wilson JA. Optimising outcome assessment of voice interventions, I: Reliability and validity of three self-reported scales. J Laryng Otol. 2007;121(8):763-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215107007177 10. Steen IN, Mackenzie K, Carding PN, Webb A, Deary IJ, Wilson JA. Optimising outcome assessment of voice interventions, II: Sensitivity to change of self-reported and observer-rated measures. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;122(1):46-51. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215107007839 11. Behlau M, Madazio G, Moreti F, Oliveira G, Alves Dos Santos LdM, Paulinelli BR, et al. Efficiency and cutoff values of self-Assessment instruments on the impact of a voice problem. J Voice. 2016;30(4): 506.e9-506.e18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.05.022 12. Wilson JA, Webb A, Carding PN, Steen IN, MacKenzie K, Deary IJ. The Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and the Vocal Handicap Index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci [Internet]. 2004 Apr; 2004 Apr 26;29(2):169-74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-7772.2004.00775.x 13. Carding PN, Steen I, Webb A, Mackenzie K, Deary IJ, Wilson JA. The reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Sep 15;29(5):538-44. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00846.x 14. Wilson JA, Webb AL, Carding PN, Steen N, MacKenzie K, Deary IJ. The Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and the Vocal Handicap Index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004;29(2):169-74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-7772.2004.00775.x 15. Mozzanica F, Robotti C, Ginocchio D, Bulgheroni C, Lorusso R, Behlau M et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian Version of the Voice Symptom Scale (I-VoiSS). J Voice. 2017;31(6):773e1-e10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.001 16. Moreti F, Zambon F, Oliveira G, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and cutoff values of the Brazilian version of the Voice Symptom Scale—VoiSS. J Voice. 2014;28(4):458-68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.11.009 17. Son H, Lee C, Kim K, Kim S, Jeong H, Kim J. The Korean version of the Voice Symptom Scale for patients with thyroid operation, and its use in a validation and reliability study. J Voice. 2018;32(3):367-73. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.003 18. Velandrino A, Cabello F, Parra M, Nicolás MJ, Losana E. Cultural adaptation and pilot study of the Spanish version of the Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS). Rev Log Fon Aud. 2018;38(4):141-84. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2018.07.003 19. Ruston FC, Moreti F, Vivero M, Malebran C, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Chilean version of the Voice Symptom Scale - VoiSS. Codas. 2016;28(5):625-33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015249 20. Contreras F, Moreti F, Vivero M, Malebran C, Behlau M. Cross-Cultural adaptation, validation, and cutoff values of the Chilean version of the Voice Symptom Scale: VoiSS. J Voice. 2021;35(3):498.e31-498.e38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.09.020 21. Correa S, Ribeiro VV, Behlau M. Chilean's Self-Perception of Their Self-Regulatory Behaviors and Vocal Symptoms. J Voice. 2022;36(2):292.e23-292.e28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.04.036 22. Arffa RE, Krishna P, Gartner-Schmidt J, Rose CA. Normative values for the Voice Handicap Index-10. J Voice. 2012;26(4):462-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.006 23. Sobol M, Sielska-Badurek, EM, Osuch-Wójcikiewicz E. Normative values for singing voice handicap index - systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;86(4):497-501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.12.004 24. Jamovi [computer program on the internet]. Version 2.3. 2023. Available from: https://www.jamovi.org 25. Botella Ausina J, Sánchez Meca J. Meta-análisis en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis; 2015. 266 p. Available from:: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=746252 26. Abad FJ, Olea J, Ponsoda V, García C. Medición en ciencas sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis; 2011. 566 p. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=552272 27. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. 2015. 28. Fayers PM, Machin, D. Quality of Life. The assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. London: John Wiley & Sons; 2016. 648 p. 29. Newborg J, Stock J, Wnek L. Inventario de Desarollo Batelle. Manual de aplicación. Madrid: Tea Ediciones; 2011. 168 p. 30. Dunn LM, Dunn, Leota M, Arribas D. PPVT-III Peabody. Test de vocabulario en imágenes: Manual. Madrid: TEA; 2010. 102 p. 31. Hartnick CJ, Volk M, Cunningham, M. Establishing normative voice-related quality of life scores within the pediatric otolaryngology population. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(10):1090-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.129.10.1090 32. Blumin J., Keppel KL, Braun NM, Kerschner JE, Merati AL. The impact of gender and age on voice related quality of life in children: Normative data. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(2):229-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.10.015
type_driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content	Text
publishDate	2023-11-30
date_accessioned	2023-11-30T16:21:14Z
date_available	2023-11-30T16:21:14Z
url	https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/228
url_doi	https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.228
eissn	2665-2056
doi	10.46634/riics.228
citationstartpage	37
citationendpage	49
url3_str_mv	https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/228/843
url4_str_mv	https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/228/844
url2_str_mv	https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/228/845
_version_	1811200650983243776
spelling	Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) Objetivo. El objetivo de este estudio fue establecer valores normativos para la escala Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) en población comunitaria española (sin problemas de voz), utilizando una muestra de un área extensa del sureste de España. Metodología. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 115 personas (60 mujeres y 55 hombres) con edades comprendidas entre los 16 y 87 años. Los participantes eran familiares que acompañaron a los pacientes a las sesiones clínicas de ORL y de Logopedia de un hospital de referencia de la Región de Murcia, así como personal del hospital. Todos declararon no padecer ningún trastorno de la voz. Resultados. Los valores normativos obtenidos en este estudio para el VoiSS fueron 14.61 (SD=8.18) para la puntuación total, 7.57 (SD = 5.42) para la subescala Limitación, 1.04 (SD = 1.65) para la subescala Emocional y 5.99 (SD = 3.61) para la subescala Física. Los valores percentílicos se obtuvieron también para la escala VoiSS y para sus tres subescalas. Conclusiones. Este estudio presenta valores normativos para la escala VoiSS que no han sido todavía obtenidos en España. Estos valores pueden utilizarse como referencia para detectar posibles trastornos de voz. Objective. The aim of this study was to establish normative values for the Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) in the Spanish community population (without voice problems), using a sample from a large area of southeastern Spain. Method. The sample consisted of 115 adults from ages 16 to 87, 60 of whom were women and 55 were men. Participants included the family members of patients who attended the Otorhinolaryngology (ENT) and Speech Therapy Clinic at a referral hospital in the region of Murcia, Spain, and some of the clinic’s staff. All the participants reported never having suffered from any voice disorder before. Results. The normative values obtained in this study for the VoiSS were 14.61 (SD=8.18) for the total score, 7.57 (SD = 5.42) for the Impairment subscale, 1.04 (SD = 1.65) for the Emotional subscale, and 5.99 (SD = 3.61) for the Physical subscale. The percentile values were also obtained for the VoiSS scale and for its three subscales. Conclusions. This study presents normative values for the VoiSS scale that have not previously been obtained in Spain. These values can be used as a reference to detect possible voice disorders. Velandrino-Nicolás, Antonio Cabello Luque, Francisco Monteagudo-Santamaría, María Gómez-Cobos, Lidia VoiSS voz trastornos de la voz calidad de la voz ronquera escala cuestionario autoinforme estadísticas poblacionales psicometría VoiSS voice voice disorders voice quality voice hoarseness scale questionnaire self report population statistics psychometrics 5 2 Artículo de revista Journal article 2023-11-30T16:21:14Z 2023-11-30T16:21:14Z 2023-11-30 text/html text/xml application/pdf Fundación Universitaria María Cano Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud 2665-2056 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/228 10.46634/riics.228 https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.228 eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2023 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. 37 49 Hogikyan ND, Rosen CA. A Review of Outcome Measurements for Voice Disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2002 May;126(5):562–72. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2002.124850 2. World Health Organization. WHOQOL measuring quality of life [Internet]. New York: WHO; 2012. Available from: https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol 3. Lohr K. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(3):193-205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015291021312 4. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, Scott JA, Rock EP, Dawisha S, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007;10(suppl 2):S125-37.. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00275.x 5. Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2001 Feb;258(2):77–82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004050000299 6. Branski RC, Cukier-Blaj S, Pusic A, Cano SJ, Klassen A, Mener D, et al. Measuring quality of life in dysphonic patients: A systematic review of content development in patient-reported outcomes measures. J Voice. 2010;24(2):193-8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.05.006 7. Francis DO, Daniero JJ, Hovis KL, Sathe N, Jacobson B, Penson DF, et al. Voice-related patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review of instrument development and validation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(1):62-88. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0022 8. Deary IJ, Wilson JA, Carding PN, McKenzie, K. VoiSS: a patient-derived voice symptom scale. J Psychosom Res. 2003;54(5):483-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00469-5 9. Webb AL, Carding PN, Deary IJ, MacKenzie K, Steen IN, Wilson JA. Optimising outcome assessment of voice interventions, I: Reliability and validity of three self-reported scales. J Laryng Otol. 2007;121(8):763-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215107007177 10. Steen IN, Mackenzie K, Carding PN, Webb A, Deary IJ, Wilson JA. Optimising outcome assessment of voice interventions, II: Sensitivity to change of self-reported and observer-rated measures. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;122(1):46-51. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215107007839 11. Behlau M, Madazio G, Moreti F, Oliveira G, Alves Dos Santos LdM, Paulinelli BR, et al. Efficiency and cutoff values of self-Assessment instruments on the impact of a voice problem. J Voice. 2016;30(4): 506.e9-506.e18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.05.022 12. Wilson JA, Webb A, Carding PN, Steen IN, MacKenzie K, Deary IJ. The Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and the Vocal Handicap Index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci [Internet]. 2004 Apr; 2004 Apr 26;29(2):169-74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-7772.2004.00775.x 13. Carding PN, Steen I, Webb A, Mackenzie K, Deary IJ, Wilson JA. The reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Sep 15;29(5):538-44. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00846.x 14. Wilson JA, Webb AL, Carding PN, Steen N, MacKenzie K, Deary IJ. The Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and the Vocal Handicap Index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004;29(2):169-74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-7772.2004.00775.x 15. Mozzanica F, Robotti C, Ginocchio D, Bulgheroni C, Lorusso R, Behlau M et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian Version of the Voice Symptom Scale (I-VoiSS). J Voice. 2017;31(6):773e1-e10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.001 16. Moreti F, Zambon F, Oliveira G, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and cutoff values of the Brazilian version of the Voice Symptom Scale—VoiSS. J Voice. 2014;28(4):458-68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.11.009 17. Son H, Lee C, Kim K, Kim S, Jeong H, Kim J. The Korean version of the Voice Symptom Scale for patients with thyroid operation, and its use in a validation and reliability study. J Voice. 2018;32(3):367-73. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.003 18. Velandrino A, Cabello F, Parra M, Nicolás MJ, Losana E. Cultural adaptation and pilot study of the Spanish version of the Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS). Rev Log Fon Aud. 2018;38(4):141-84. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2018.07.003 19. Ruston FC, Moreti F, Vivero M, Malebran C, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Chilean version of the Voice Symptom Scale - VoiSS. Codas. 2016;28(5):625-33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015249 20. Contreras F, Moreti F, Vivero M, Malebran C, Behlau M. Cross-Cultural adaptation, validation, and cutoff values of the Chilean version of the Voice Symptom Scale: VoiSS. J Voice. 2021;35(3):498.e31-498.e38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.09.020 21. Correa S, Ribeiro VV, Behlau M. Chilean's Self-Perception of Their Self-Regulatory Behaviors and Vocal Symptoms. J Voice. 2022;36(2):292.e23-292.e28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.04.036 22. Arffa RE, Krishna P, Gartner-Schmidt J, Rose CA. Normative values for the Voice Handicap Index-10. J Voice. 2012;26(4):462-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.006 23. Sobol M, Sielska-Badurek, EM, Osuch-Wójcikiewicz E. Normative values for singing voice handicap index - systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;86(4):497-501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.12.004 24. Jamovi [computer program on the internet]. Version 2.3. 2023. Available from: https://www.jamovi.org 25. Botella Ausina J, Sánchez Meca J. Meta-análisis en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis; 2015. 266 p. Available from:: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=746252 26. Abad FJ, Olea J, Ponsoda V, García C. Medición en ciencas sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis; 2011. 566 p. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=552272 27. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. 2015. 28. Fayers PM, Machin, D. Quality of Life. The assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. London: John Wiley & Sons; 2016. 648 p. 29. Newborg J, Stock J, Wnek L. Inventario de Desarollo Batelle. Manual de aplicación. Madrid: Tea Ediciones; 2011. 168 p. 30. Dunn LM, Dunn, Leota M, Arribas D. PPVT-III Peabody. Test de vocabulario en imágenes: Manual. Madrid: TEA; 2010. 102 p. 31. Hartnick CJ, Volk M, Cunningham, M. Establishing normative voice-related quality of life scores within the pediatric otolaryngology population. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(10):1090-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.129.10.1090 32. Blumin J., Keppel KL, Braun NM, Kerschner JE, Merati AL. The impact of gender and age on voice related quality of life in children: Normative data. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(2):229-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.10.015 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/228/843 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/228/844 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/228/845 info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Publication

Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) .

Código QR

Estadísticas y Métricas Alternativas

Títulos similares

Valores normativos para la versión española de la Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS)
.