Titulo:
Propiedades métricas del Test de Desarrollo Motor en niños colombianos
.
Sumario:
Objetivo. El objetivo de esta investigación fue determinar las propiedades métricas del Test de Rendimiento Motor Infantil (TIMP) adaptado al español de Colombia. Métodos. Este estudio evaluó una prueba diagnóstica mediante análisis de propiedades métricas, es decir, consistencia interna, confiabilidad interevaluadores y validez concurrente. La unidad de análisis fue el Test de Rendimiento Motor Infantil. Se evaluó una muestra de 112 niños de entre 36 semanas de edad postmenstrual y 4 meses de edad. Participaron dos evaluadores expertos en el área de la neurorrehabilitación infantil, con experiencia y formación en la aplicación del instrumento. El análisis de consistencia interna se realizó mediante el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. La evalu... Ver más
Guardado en:
2665-2056
2023-08-09
press
press
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2024
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
metarevistapublica_fumc_revistadeinvestigacioneinnovacionencienciasdelasalud_67-article-327 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
FUNDACION UNIVERSITARIA MARIA CANO |
| thumbnail |
https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/FUNDACIONUNIVERSITARIAMARIACANO/logo.png |
| country_str |
Colombia |
| collection |
Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud |
| title |
Propiedades métricas del Test de Desarrollo Motor en niños colombianos |
| spellingShingle |
Propiedades métricas del Test de Desarrollo Motor en niños colombianos Malpica Ríos, Jouvelly Catalina Acosta Otálora, Martha Lucía Quijano Cuéllar, Maritza Salamanca Duque, Luisa Matilde Pinzón Bernal, Mónica Yamile Serrano-Gómez, María Eugenia Riesgo neurológico Fisioterapia Confiabilidad inter evaluadores Nacimiento prematuro Validez de los resultados Reproducibilidad de los resultados Psicometría Test de Desarrollo Motor Infantil Habilidades motoras Reproducibility of the results Psychometry Infant Motor Performance Test Validity of the results Premature birth Motor Skills Neurological risk Interrater reliability Physical therapy |
| title_short |
Propiedades métricas del Test de Desarrollo Motor en niños colombianos |
| title_full |
Propiedades métricas del Test de Desarrollo Motor en niños colombianos |
| title_fullStr |
Propiedades métricas del Test de Desarrollo Motor en niños colombianos |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Propiedades métricas del Test de Desarrollo Motor en niños colombianos |
| title_sort |
propiedades métricas del test de desarrollo motor en niños colombianos |
| description |
Objetivo. El objetivo de esta investigación fue determinar las propiedades métricas del Test de Rendimiento Motor Infantil (TIMP) adaptado al español de Colombia.
Métodos. Este estudio evaluó una prueba diagnóstica mediante análisis de propiedades métricas, es decir, consistencia interna, confiabilidad interevaluadores y validez concurrente. La unidad de análisis fue el Test de Rendimiento Motor Infantil. Se evaluó una muestra de 112 niños de entre 36 semanas de edad postmenstrual y 4 meses de edad. Participaron dos evaluadores expertos en el área de la neurorrehabilitación infantil, con experiencia y formación en la aplicación del instrumento. El análisis de consistencia interna se realizó mediante el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. La evaluación de la fiabilidad entre evaluadores se realizó mediante el cálculo de los coeficientes de correlación intraclase. Para determinar la validez concurrente se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson. Los análisis de los datos obtenidos se realizaron con el programa SPSS versión 27.0.
Resultados. El α de Cronbach se situó entre 0,61 y 0,84. En cuanto a la fiabilidad, el instrumento arrojó un coeficiente de correlación intraclase entre 0,54 y 0,93. La validez concurrente arrojó un coeficiente de correlación de Pearson de 0,82.
Conclusiones. El TIMP adaptado al español colombiano es un instrumento válido y confiable que puede ser utilizado para la evaluación del desempeño motor en niños.
|
| description_eng |
Objective. The objective of this research was to determine the metric properties of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) adapted to Colombian Spanish.
Methods. This study evaluated a diagnostic test through analyses of metric properties, i.e., internal consistency, interrater reliability and concurrent validity. The unit of analysis was the Test of Infant Motor Performance. A sample of 112 children between 36 weeks postmenstrual age and 4 months of age was assessed. Two expert evaluators in the area of child neurorehabilitation, with expertise and training in the application of the instrument, participated. The internal consistency analysis was performed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The interrater reliability evaluation was performed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine concurrent validity. The analyses of the data obtained were performed using SPSS version 27.0.
Results. The Cronbach’s α was between 0.61 and 0.84. For the reliability, the instrument revealed an intraclass correlation coefficient between 0.54 and 0.93. The concurrent validity showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.82.
Conclusions. The TIMP adapted to Colombian Spanish is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used for the assessment of motor performance in children.
|
| author |
Malpica Ríos, Jouvelly Catalina Acosta Otálora, Martha Lucía Quijano Cuéllar, Maritza Salamanca Duque, Luisa Matilde Pinzón Bernal, Mónica Yamile Serrano-Gómez, María Eugenia |
| author_facet |
Malpica Ríos, Jouvelly Catalina Acosta Otálora, Martha Lucía Quijano Cuéllar, Maritza Salamanca Duque, Luisa Matilde Pinzón Bernal, Mónica Yamile Serrano-Gómez, María Eugenia |
| topicspa_str_mv |
Riesgo neurológico Fisioterapia Confiabilidad inter evaluadores Nacimiento prematuro Validez de los resultados Reproducibilidad de los resultados Psicometría Test de Desarrollo Motor Infantil Habilidades motoras |
| topic |
Riesgo neurológico Fisioterapia Confiabilidad inter evaluadores Nacimiento prematuro Validez de los resultados Reproducibilidad de los resultados Psicometría Test de Desarrollo Motor Infantil Habilidades motoras Reproducibility of the results Psychometry Infant Motor Performance Test Validity of the results Premature birth Motor Skills Neurological risk Interrater reliability Physical therapy |
| topic_facet |
Riesgo neurológico Fisioterapia Confiabilidad inter evaluadores Nacimiento prematuro Validez de los resultados Reproducibilidad de los resultados Psicometría Test de Desarrollo Motor Infantil Habilidades motoras Reproducibility of the results Psychometry Infant Motor Performance Test Validity of the results Premature birth Motor Skills Neurological risk Interrater reliability Physical therapy |
| citationedition |
: Press articles |
| publisher |
Fundación Universitaria María Cano |
| ispartofjournal |
Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud |
| source |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/327 |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Article |
| rights |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2024 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| references |
Ramos I, Márquez A. Recién nacido de riesgo neurológico. Vox Paediatrica [Internet]. 2000;8(2):5-10. Available from: https://spaoyex.es/voxp/volumen-8-2000-n-2 2. Rodríguez-Valdés R, Aguilar-Fabré L, Rivera-Alés L, Galán-García L, Aguilar-Fabré K, Barrera-Sánchez J, et al. Estudio clínico y electroencefalográfico en lactantes con factores de riesgo de daño neurológico. Rev mexicana de neurociencia [Internet]. 2018;19(4):25-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.31190/rmn.2018.19.4.25.35 3. World Health Organization (WHO) [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; c2024. Nacimientos Prematuros; 2018 Feb 19 [updated 2023 May 11; cited Jan 16 2023]; [about 4 screens]. Available from: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth 4. Ospino M, Mercado M. Comportamiento de la Prematuridad en Colombia Durante los Años 2007 a 2016. Poster session presented at: XII International Conference on KMC; 2018 Nov 14-17; Bogotá, Colombia. Available from: https://fundacioncanguro.co/documentacion-canguro/#XII_Encuentro_Internacional_sobre_el_MMC_%E2%80%93_Bogot%C3%A1_Colombia_2018_ 5. Ismail FY, Fatemi A, Johnston MV. Cerebral plasticity: Windows of opportunity in the developing brain. Eur J Paediatr Neuro [Internet]. 2017;21(1):23-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.07.007 6. Hadders-Algra M. Early Diagnostics and Early Intervention in Neurodevelopmental Disorders—Age-Dependent Challenges and Opportunities. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2021;10(4):1-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040861 7. American Physical Therapy Association. Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. 3rd Edition. Alexandria: American Physical Therapy Association APTA. 2014. 22-23 p. 8. Campbell S. The Test of infant motor performance: Test user’s manual version 3.0 for the TIMP version 5. Chicago: Infant Motor Performance Scales, LLC; 2012. 65 p. 9. Echevarría Ulloa M. Adaptación transcultural y versión española de la prueba de rendimiento motor infantil (TIMP) [doctoral dissertation]. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid; 2017. 121 p. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/22237 10. Academy of Pediatric Physical Therapy (APTA). Fact Sheet. List of Pediatric Assessment Tools Categorized by ICF Model [Internet]. 2013. 6 p. Available from: https://pediatricapta.org/includes/fact-sheets/pdfs/FactSheet_ListofPediatricAssessmentToolsCategorizedbyICFModel_2013.pdf 11. Naranjo Ruiz M, Guerrero Uchima IG, Serrano Gómez ME, Acosta Otálora ML, Pinzón Bernal MY, Salamanca Duque LM. Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Test of Infant Motor Performance to Colombian Spanish. Rev Cienc Salud [Internet]. 2022;20(1):1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.10146 12. Carretero-Dios H, Pérez C. Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: Considerations about test selection in psychological research. In J Clin Health Psychol [Internet]. 2007;7(3):863-82. Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33770319 13. Kline P. An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2014. 208 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315788135 14. Peyton C, Schreiber MD, Msall ME. The Test of Infant Motor Performance at 3 months predicts language, cognitive, and motor outcomes in infants born preterm at 2 years of age. Dev Med Child Neurol [Internet]. 2018;60(12):1239-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13736 15. Kim SA, Lee YJ, Lee YG. Predictive Value of Test of Infant Motor Performance for Infants based on Correlation between TIMP and Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Ann Rehabil Med. [Internet]. 2011;35(6):860-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.6.860 16. Chiquetti EMS, Valentini NC, Saccani R. Validation and Reliability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for Brazilian Infants. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. [Internet]. 2020;40(4):470-85. Available from: https://research-ebsco-com.ez.urosario.edu.co/linkprocessor/plink?id=15a63fb7-a2e9-3110-abc5-c8a91fe3d3fd 17. Kvestad I, Silpakar JS, Hysing M, Ranjitkar S, Strand TA, Schwinger C, et al. The reliability and predictive ability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) in a community-based study in Bhaktapur, Nepal. Infant Behav Dev [Internet]. 2023;70:101809. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101809 18. Ustad T, Helbostad JL, Campbell SK, Girolami GL, Jørgensen L, Øberg GK, et al. Test-retest reliability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance Screening Items in infants at risk for impaired functional motor performance. Early Hum Dev. [Internet]. 2016;93:43-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.12.007 19. Noble Y, Boyd R. Neonatal assessments for the preterm infant up to 4 months corrected age: A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. [Internet]. 2012;54(2):129-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03903.x 20. Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol. [Internet]. 2008;50(4):254-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02025.x 21. Campbell S, Kolobe T. Concurrent validity of the test of infant motor performance with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Pediatr Phys Ther. [Internet]. 2000;12(1):2-9. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/pedpt/abstract/2000/01210/concurrent_validity_of_the_test_of_infant_motor.2.aspx 22. Echevarria M, Arroyo O, Lavin JL, Ubeda A, Martin P, Sanchez M. Spanish version of the test of infant motor performance (TIMP): Initial phase of cultural adaptation. J Perinat Med. [Internet]. 2015;43. Available from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2015-2003/html 23. Campbell S, Kolobe T, Osten E, Lenke M, Girolami G. Construct validity of the test of infant motor performance. Phys Ther [Internet]. 1995;75(7):585-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/75.7.585 24. Campbell S, Kolobe T, Wright B, Linacre J. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol [Internet]. 2002;44(4):263-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2002.tb00802.x 25. Rose RU, Westcott SL. Responsiveness of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) in infants born preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther [Internet]. 2005;17(3):219-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PEP.0000176575.63915.67 26. Piper M, Darrah J. Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant. Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). 2nd ed. Ámsterdam: Elsevier; 2021. 288 p. 27. Serrano ME, Camargo DM. Reproducibilidad de la Escala Motriz del Infante de Alberta (Alberta Infant Motor Scale) aplicada por fisioterapeutas en formación. Fisioterapia [Internet]. 2013;35(3):112-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ft.2012.09.002 28. Morales-Monforte E, Bagur-Calafat C, Suc-Lerin N, Fornaguera-Marti M, Cazorla-Sanchez E, Girabent-Farres M. The Spanish version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: Validity and reliability analysis. Dev Neurorehabil [Internet]. 2017;20(2):76-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2015.1066461 29. Syrengelas D, Siahanidou T, Kourlaba G, Kleisiouni P, Bakoula C, Chrousos GP. Standardization of the Alberta infant motor scale in full-term Greek infants: Preliminary results. Early Hum Dev [Internet]. 2010;86(4):245-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.03.009 30. de Albuquerque PL, de Farias Guerra MQ, de Carvalho Lima M, Eickmann SH. Concurrent validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale to detect delayed gross motor development in preterm infants: A comparative study with the Bayley III. Dev Neurorehabil [Internet]. 2018;21(6):408-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2017.1323974 31. Pin TW, de Valle K, Eldridge B, Galea MP. Clinimetric properties of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in infants born preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther [Internet]. 2010;22(3):278-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181e94481 32. Uesugi M, Tokuhisa K, Shimada T. The reliability and validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in Japan. Journal of physical therapy science [Internet]. 2008;20(3):169-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.20.169 33. Rau MP, Hsue BJ, Ko YC, Lin YC. The concurrent validity of assessment of general movements with Alberta Infants Motor Scale. Physiotherapy [Internet]. 2015;101(Suppl 1):e1264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.1171 34. World Medical Association (WMA) [Internet]. Ferney-Voltaire: WMA; c2024. WMA declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects; 2022 Sep 6 [updated 2023 May 11; cited Jan 16 2023]; [about 8 screens]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/ 35. Ministerio de Salud. Resolución No. 8430 de 1993, por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud (Oct 4, 1993). Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/salud/Lists/Normatividad%20%20Salud/DispForm.aspx?ID=2110&ContentTypeId=0x0100A08A4A1DF8E9D448BEF600BFAC0E7622 36. Castillo C, Corssen C, Breinbauer H, Namoncura C. Evaluación adenoídea mediante nasofaringolaringoscopía: validación del método. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2008;68(2):143-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48162008000200005 37. Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg [Internet]. 2018;126(5):1763-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 38. Ravarian A, Rahmani N, Soleimani F, Sajedi F, Noroozi M, Campbell SK, et al. Test of infant motor performance: Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability in Persian infants. Early Hum Dev [Internet]. 2023;184:105831. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2023.105831 39. Campbell S, Zawacki L, Rankin K, Yoder J, Shapiro N, Li Z, et al. Concurrent validity of the TIMP and the Bayley III scales at 6 weeks corrected age. Pediatr Phys Ther [Internet]. 2013;25(4):395-401. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e31829db85b 40. Lekskulchai R, Cole J. Effect of a developmental program on motor performance in infants born preterm. Aust J Physiother [Internet]. 2001;47(3):169-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60264-6 41. Finkel R, Hynan L, Glanzman A, Owens H, Nelson L, Cone S, et al. The test of infant motor performance: Reliability in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type I. Pediatr Phys Ther [Internet]. 2008;20(3):242-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e318181ae96 |
| type_driver |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| type_coar |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| type_version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| type_coarversion |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| type_content |
Text |
| publishDate |
2023-08-09 |
| date_accessioned |
2023-08-09T15:37:24Z |
| date_available |
2023-08-09T15:37:24Z |
| url |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/327 |
| url_doi |
https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.327 |
| eissn |
2665-2056 |
| doi |
10.46634/riics.327 |
| citationstartpage |
press |
| citationendpage |
press |
| url3_str_mv |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/327/1055 |
| url4_str_mv |
https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/327/1056 |
| _version_ |
1815133176938364928 |
| spelling |
Propiedades métricas del Test de Desarrollo Motor en niños colombianos This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Riesgo neurológico Artículo de revista Propiedades métricas del Test de Desarrollo Motor en niños colombianos text/html text/xml https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/327 Español https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud - 2024 Ramos I, Márquez A. Recién nacido de riesgo neurológico. Vox Paediatrica [Internet]. 2000;8(2):5-10. Available from: https://spaoyex.es/voxp/volumen-8-2000-n-2 2. Rodríguez-Valdés R, Aguilar-Fabré L, Rivera-Alés L, Galán-García L, Aguilar-Fabré K, Barrera-Sánchez J, et al. Estudio clínico y electroencefalográfico en lactantes con factores de riesgo de daño neurológico. Rev mexicana de neurociencia [Internet]. 2018;19(4):25-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.31190/rmn.2018.19.4.25.35 3. World Health Organization (WHO) [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; c2024. Nacimientos Prematuros; 2018 Feb 19 [updated 2023 May 11; cited Jan 16 2023]; [about 4 screens]. Available from: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth 4. Ospino M, Mercado M. Comportamiento de la Prematuridad en Colombia Durante los Años 2007 a 2016. Poster session presented at: XII International Conference on KMC; 2018 Nov 14-17; Bogotá, Colombia. Available from: https://fundacioncanguro.co/documentacion-canguro/#XII_Encuentro_Internacional_sobre_el_MMC_%E2%80%93_Bogot%C3%A1_Colombia_2018_ 5. Ismail FY, Fatemi A, Johnston MV. Cerebral plasticity: Windows of opportunity in the developing brain. Eur J Paediatr Neuro [Internet]. 2017;21(1):23-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.07.007 6. Hadders-Algra M. Early Diagnostics and Early Intervention in Neurodevelopmental Disorders—Age-Dependent Challenges and Opportunities. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2021;10(4):1-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040861 7. American Physical Therapy Association. Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. 3rd Edition. Alexandria: American Physical Therapy Association APTA. 2014. 22-23 p. 8. Campbell S. The Test of infant motor performance: Test user’s manual version 3.0 for the TIMP version 5. Chicago: Infant Motor Performance Scales, LLC; 2012. 65 p. 9. Echevarría Ulloa M. Adaptación transcultural y versión española de la prueba de rendimiento motor infantil (TIMP) [doctoral dissertation]. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid; 2017. 121 p. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/22237 10. Academy of Pediatric Physical Therapy (APTA). Fact Sheet. List of Pediatric Assessment Tools Categorized by ICF Model [Internet]. 2013. 6 p. Available from: https://pediatricapta.org/includes/fact-sheets/pdfs/FactSheet_ListofPediatricAssessmentToolsCategorizedbyICFModel_2013.pdf 11. Naranjo Ruiz M, Guerrero Uchima IG, Serrano Gómez ME, Acosta Otálora ML, Pinzón Bernal MY, Salamanca Duque LM. Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Test of Infant Motor Performance to Colombian Spanish. Rev Cienc Salud [Internet]. 2022;20(1):1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.10146 12. Carretero-Dios H, Pérez C. Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: Considerations about test selection in psychological research. In J Clin Health Psychol [Internet]. 2007;7(3):863-82. Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33770319 13. Kline P. An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2014. 208 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315788135 14. Peyton C, Schreiber MD, Msall ME. The Test of Infant Motor Performance at 3 months predicts language, cognitive, and motor outcomes in infants born preterm at 2 years of age. Dev Med Child Neurol [Internet]. 2018;60(12):1239-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13736 15. Kim SA, Lee YJ, Lee YG. Predictive Value of Test of Infant Motor Performance for Infants based on Correlation between TIMP and Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Ann Rehabil Med. [Internet]. 2011;35(6):860-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.6.860 16. Chiquetti EMS, Valentini NC, Saccani R. Validation and Reliability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for Brazilian Infants. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. [Internet]. 2020;40(4):470-85. Available from: https://research-ebsco-com.ez.urosario.edu.co/linkprocessor/plink?id=15a63fb7-a2e9-3110-abc5-c8a91fe3d3fd 17. Kvestad I, Silpakar JS, Hysing M, Ranjitkar S, Strand TA, Schwinger C, et al. The reliability and predictive ability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) in a community-based study in Bhaktapur, Nepal. Infant Behav Dev [Internet]. 2023;70:101809. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101809 18. Ustad T, Helbostad JL, Campbell SK, Girolami GL, Jørgensen L, Øberg GK, et al. Test-retest reliability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance Screening Items in infants at risk for impaired functional motor performance. Early Hum Dev. [Internet]. 2016;93:43-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.12.007 19. Noble Y, Boyd R. Neonatal assessments for the preterm infant up to 4 months corrected age: A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. [Internet]. 2012;54(2):129-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03903.x 20. Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol. [Internet]. 2008;50(4):254-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02025.x 21. Campbell S, Kolobe T. Concurrent validity of the test of infant motor performance with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Pediatr Phys Ther. [Internet]. 2000;12(1):2-9. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/pedpt/abstract/2000/01210/concurrent_validity_of_the_test_of_infant_motor.2.aspx 22. Echevarria M, Arroyo O, Lavin JL, Ubeda A, Martin P, Sanchez M. Spanish version of the test of infant motor performance (TIMP): Initial phase of cultural adaptation. J Perinat Med. [Internet]. 2015;43. Available from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2015-2003/html 23. Campbell S, Kolobe T, Osten E, Lenke M, Girolami G. Construct validity of the test of infant motor performance. Phys Ther [Internet]. 1995;75(7):585-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/75.7.585 24. Campbell S, Kolobe T, Wright B, Linacre J. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol [Internet]. 2002;44(4):263-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2002.tb00802.x 25. Rose RU, Westcott SL. Responsiveness of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) in infants born preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther [Internet]. 2005;17(3):219-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PEP.0000176575.63915.67 26. Piper M, Darrah J. Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant. Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). 2nd ed. Ámsterdam: Elsevier; 2021. 288 p. 27. Serrano ME, Camargo DM. Reproducibilidad de la Escala Motriz del Infante de Alberta (Alberta Infant Motor Scale) aplicada por fisioterapeutas en formación. Fisioterapia [Internet]. 2013;35(3):112-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ft.2012.09.002 28. Morales-Monforte E, Bagur-Calafat C, Suc-Lerin N, Fornaguera-Marti M, Cazorla-Sanchez E, Girabent-Farres M. The Spanish version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: Validity and reliability analysis. Dev Neurorehabil [Internet]. 2017;20(2):76-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2015.1066461 29. Syrengelas D, Siahanidou T, Kourlaba G, Kleisiouni P, Bakoula C, Chrousos GP. Standardization of the Alberta infant motor scale in full-term Greek infants: Preliminary results. Early Hum Dev [Internet]. 2010;86(4):245-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.03.009 30. de Albuquerque PL, de Farias Guerra MQ, de Carvalho Lima M, Eickmann SH. Concurrent validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale to detect delayed gross motor development in preterm infants: A comparative study with the Bayley III. Dev Neurorehabil [Internet]. 2018;21(6):408-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2017.1323974 31. Pin TW, de Valle K, Eldridge B, Galea MP. Clinimetric properties of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in infants born preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther [Internet]. 2010;22(3):278-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181e94481 32. Uesugi M, Tokuhisa K, Shimada T. The reliability and validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in Japan. Journal of physical therapy science [Internet]. 2008;20(3):169-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.20.169 33. Rau MP, Hsue BJ, Ko YC, Lin YC. The concurrent validity of assessment of general movements with Alberta Infants Motor Scale. Physiotherapy [Internet]. 2015;101(Suppl 1):e1264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.1171 34. World Medical Association (WMA) [Internet]. Ferney-Voltaire: WMA; c2024. WMA declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects; 2022 Sep 6 [updated 2023 May 11; cited Jan 16 2023]; [about 8 screens]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/ 35. Ministerio de Salud. Resolución No. 8430 de 1993, por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud (Oct 4, 1993). Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/salud/Lists/Normatividad%20%20Salud/DispForm.aspx?ID=2110&ContentTypeId=0x0100A08A4A1DF8E9D448BEF600BFAC0E7622 36. Castillo C, Corssen C, Breinbauer H, Namoncura C. Evaluación adenoídea mediante nasofaringolaringoscopía: validación del método. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2008;68(2):143-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48162008000200005 37. Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg [Internet]. 2018;126(5):1763-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 38. Ravarian A, Rahmani N, Soleimani F, Sajedi F, Noroozi M, Campbell SK, et al. Test of infant motor performance: Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability in Persian infants. Early Hum Dev [Internet]. 2023;184:105831. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2023.105831 39. Campbell S, Zawacki L, Rankin K, Yoder J, Shapiro N, Li Z, et al. Concurrent validity of the TIMP and the Bayley III scales at 6 weeks corrected age. Pediatr Phys Ther [Internet]. 2013;25(4):395-401. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e31829db85b 40. Lekskulchai R, Cole J. Effect of a developmental program on motor performance in infants born preterm. Aust J Physiother [Internet]. 2001;47(3):169-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60264-6 41. Finkel R, Hynan L, Glanzman A, Owens H, Nelson L, Cone S, et al. The test of infant motor performance: Reliability in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type I. Pediatr Phys Ther [Internet]. 2008;20(3):242-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e318181ae96 Fisioterapia info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Text Confiabilidad inter evaluadores Publication Nacimiento prematuro Validez de los resultados Reproducibilidad de los resultados Objetivo. El objetivo de esta investigación fue determinar las propiedades métricas del Test de Rendimiento Motor Infantil (TIMP) adaptado al español de Colombia. Métodos. Este estudio evaluó una prueba diagnóstica mediante análisis de propiedades métricas, es decir, consistencia interna, confiabilidad interevaluadores y validez concurrente. La unidad de análisis fue el Test de Rendimiento Motor Infantil. Se evaluó una muestra de 112 niños de entre 36 semanas de edad postmenstrual y 4 meses de edad. Participaron dos evaluadores expertos en el área de la neurorrehabilitación infantil, con experiencia y formación en la aplicación del instrumento. El análisis de consistencia interna se realizó mediante el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. La evaluación de la fiabilidad entre evaluadores se realizó mediante el cálculo de los coeficientes de correlación intraclase. Para determinar la validez concurrente se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson. Los análisis de los datos obtenidos se realizaron con el programa SPSS versión 27.0. Resultados. El α de Cronbach se situó entre 0,61 y 0,84. En cuanto a la fiabilidad, el instrumento arrojó un coeficiente de correlación intraclase entre 0,54 y 0,93. La validez concurrente arrojó un coeficiente de correlación de Pearson de 0,82. Conclusiones. El TIMP adaptado al español colombiano es un instrumento válido y confiable que puede ser utilizado para la evaluación del desempeño motor en niños. Psicometría Test de Desarrollo Motor Infantil Habilidades motoras Malpica Ríos, Jouvelly Catalina Reproducibility of the results Psychometry Infant Motor Performance Test Acosta Otálora, Martha Lucía Quijano Cuéllar, Maritza Salamanca Duque, Luisa Matilde Pinzón Bernal, Mónica Yamile Serrano-Gómez, María Eugenia Objective. The objective of this research was to determine the metric properties of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) adapted to Colombian Spanish. Methods. This study evaluated a diagnostic test through analyses of metric properties, i.e., internal consistency, interrater reliability and concurrent validity. The unit of analysis was the Test of Infant Motor Performance. A sample of 112 children between 36 weeks postmenstrual age and 4 months of age was assessed. Two expert evaluators in the area of child neurorehabilitation, with expertise and training in the application of the instrument, participated. The internal consistency analysis was performed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The interrater reliability evaluation was performed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine concurrent validity. The analyses of the data obtained were performed using SPSS version 27.0. Results. The Cronbach’s α was between 0.61 and 0.84. For the reliability, the instrument revealed an intraclass correlation coefficient between 0.54 and 0.93. The concurrent validity showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.82. Conclusions. The TIMP adapted to Colombian Spanish is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used for the assessment of motor performance in children. Validity of the results Premature birth Motor Skills Fundación Universitaria María Cano : Press articles Neurological risk Interrater reliability Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud Physical therapy Journal article https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/327/1055 https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/download/327/1056 2665-2056 https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.327 press press 2023-08-09 2023-08-09T15:37:24Z 2023-08-09T15:37:24Z 10.46634/riics.327 |